2026-02-19 02:56:56
25+ years into my career as a programmer I think I may finally be coming around to preferring type hints or even strong typing. I resisted those in the past because they slowed down the rate at which I could iterate on code, especially in the REPL environments that were key to my productivity. But if a coding agent is doing all that typing for me, the benefits of explicitly defining all of those types are suddenly much more attractive.
Tags: ai-assisted-programming, programming, programming-languages, static-typing
2026-02-19 01:07:31
The A.I. Disruption We’ve Been Waiting for Has Arrived
New opinion piece from Paul Ford in the New York Times. Unsurprisingly for a piece by Paul it's packed with quoteworthy snippets, but a few stood out for me in particular.Paul describes the November moment that so many other programmers have observed, and highlights Claude Code's ability to revive old side projects:
[Claude Code] was always a helpful coding assistant, but in November it suddenly got much better, and ever since I’ve been knocking off side projects that had sat in folders for a decade or longer. It’s fun to see old ideas come to life, so I keep a steady flow. Maybe it adds up to a half-hour a day of my time, and an hour of Claude’s.
November was, for me and many others in tech, a great surprise. Before, A.I. coding tools were often useful, but halting and clumsy. Now, the bot can run for a full hour and make whole, designed websites and apps that may be flawed, but credible. I spent an entire session of therapy talking about it.
And as the former CEO of a respected consultancy firm (Postlight) he's well positioned to evaluate the potential impact:
When you watch a large language model slice through some horrible, expensive problem — like migrating data from an old platform to a modern one — you feel the earth shifting. I was the chief executive of a software services firm, which made me a professional software cost estimator. When I rebooted my messy personal website a few weeks ago, I realized: I would have paid $25,000 for someone else to do this. When a friend asked me to convert a large, thorny data set, I downloaded it, cleaned it up and made it pretty and easy to explore. In the past I would have charged $350,000.
That last price is full 2021 retail — it implies a product manager, a designer, two engineers (one senior) and four to six months of design, coding and testing. Plus maintenance. Bespoke software is joltingly expensive. Today, though, when the stars align and my prompts work out, I can do hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of work for fun (fun for me) over weekends and evenings, for the price of the Claude $200-a-month plan.
He also neatly captures the inherent community tension involved in exploring this technology:
All of the people I love hate this stuff, and all the people I hate love it. And yet, likely because of the same personality flaws that drew me to technology in the first place, I am annoyingly excited.
Tags: new-york-times, paul-ford, careers, ai, generative-ai, llms, ai-assisted-programming, ai-ethics, coding-agents, claude-code
2026-02-19 00:50:07
LLMs are eating specialty skills. There will be less use of specialist front-end and back-end developers as the LLM-driving skills become more important than the details of platform usage. Will this lead to a greater recognition of the role of Expert Generalists? Or will the ability of LLMs to write lots of code mean they code around the silos rather than eliminating them?
— Martin Fowler, tidbits from the Thoughtworks Future of Software Development Retreat, via HN)
Tags: martin-fowler, careers, generative-ai, ai, llms, ai-assisted-programming
2026-02-18 07:58:58
Sonnet 4.6 is out today, and Anthropic claim it offers similar performance to November's Opus 4.5 while maintaining the Sonnet pricing of $3/million input and $15/million output tokens (the Opus models are $5/$25). Here's the system card PDF.
Sonnet 4.6 has a "reliable knowledge cutoff" of August 2025, compared to Opus 4.6's May 2025 and Haiku 4.5's February 2025. Both Opus and Sonnet default to 200,000 max input tokens but can stretch to 1 million in beta and at a higher cost.
I just released llm-anthropic 0.24 with support for both Sonnet 4.6 and Opus 4.6. Claude Code did most of the work - the new models had a fiddly amount of extra details around adaptive thinking and no longer supporting prefixes, as described in Anthropic's migration guide.
Here's what I got from:
uvx --with llm-anthropic llm 'Generate an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle' -m claude-sonnet-4.6

The SVG comments include:
<!-- Hat (fun accessory) -->
I tried a second time and also got a top hat. Sonnet 4.6 apparently loves top hats!
For comparison, here's the pelican Opus 4.5 drew me in November:

And here's Anthropic's current best pelican, drawn by Opus 4.6 on February 5th:

Opus 4.6 produces the best pelican beak/pouch. I do think the top hat from Sonnet 4.6 is a nice touch though.
Via Hacker News
Tags: ai, generative-ai, llms, llm, anthropic, claude, llm-pricing, pelican-riding-a-bicycle, llm-release, claude-code
2026-02-18 07:02:33
My Rodney CLI tool for browser automation attracted quite the flurry of PRs since I announced it last week. Here are the release notes for the just-released v0.4.0:
- Errors now use exit code 2, which means exit code 1 is just for for check failures. #15
- New
rodney assertcommand for running JavaScript tests, exit code 1 if they fail. #19- New directory-scoped sessions with
--local/--globalflags. #14- New
reload --hardandclear-cachecommands. #17- New
rodney start --showoption to make the browser window visible. Thanks, Antonio Cuni. #13- New
rodney connect PORTcommand to debug an already-running Chrome instance. Thanks, Peter Fraenkel. #12- New
RODNEY_HOMEenvironment variable to support custom state directories. Thanks, Senko Rašić. #11- New
--insecureflag to ignore certificate errors. Thanks, Jakub Zgoliński. #10- Windows support: avoid
Setsidon Windows via build-tag helpers. Thanks, adm1neca. #18- Tests now run on
windows-latestandmacos-latestin addition to Linux.
I've been using Showboat to create demos of new features - here those are for rodney assert, rodney reload --hard, rodney exit codes, and rodney start --local.
The rodney assert command is pretty neat: you can now Rodney to test a web app through multiple steps in a shell script that looks something like this (adapted from the README):
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
FAIL=0
check() {
if ! "$@"; then
echo "FAIL: $*"
FAIL=1
fi
}
rodney start
rodney open "https://example.com"
rodney waitstable
# Assert elements exist
check rodney exists "h1"
# Assert key elements are visible
check rodney visible "h1"
check rodney visible "#main-content"
# Assert JS expressions
check rodney assert 'document.title' 'Example Domain'
check rodney assert 'document.querySelectorAll("p").length' '2'
# Assert accessibility requirements
check rodney ax-find --role navigation
rodney stop
if [ "$FAIL" -ne 0 ]; then
echo "Some checks failed"
exit 1
fi
echo "All checks passed"Tags: browsers, projects, testing, annotated-release-notes, rodney
2026-02-17 22:49:04
This is the story of the United Space Ship Enterprise. Assigned a five year patrol of our galaxy, the giant starship visits Earth colonies, regulates commerce, and explores strange new worlds and civilizations. These are its voyages... and its adventures.
— ROUGH DRAFT 8/2/66, before the Star Trek opening narration reached its final form
Tags: screen-writing, science-fiction