MoreRSS

site iconDaniel LemireModify

Computer science professor at the University of Quebec (TELUQ), open-source hacker, and long-time blogger.
Please copy the RSS to your reader, or quickly subscribe to:

Inoreader Feedly Follow Feedbin Local Reader

Rss preview of twitter of Daniel Lemire

Re Historiquement, les subventions sont arrivées après que Tesla ait établi le marché. Elles visent à permettre aux concurrents de Tesla de parti...

2025-01-31 02:07:09

Re Historiquement, les subventions sont arrivées après que Tesla ait établi le marché. Elles visent à permettre aux concurrents de Tesla de participer au marché.

La fin des subventions est à l'avantage de Musk puisque sans les subventions, les autres fabriquants deviennent largement déficitaires alors que Tesla peut continuer à faire des profits malgré l'absence de subventions.

Je puis vous assurer que, même sans aucune subvention, Tesla va continuer de vendre des voitures au Québec.

Re @jochenleidner Quot homines anno 2025 Latine legere possunt?

2025-01-31 02:03:50

Re @jochenleidner Quot homines anno 2025 Latine legere possunt?

Re @jochenleidner What do they have against Latin?

2025-01-31 01:56:14

Re @jochenleidner What do they have against Latin?

Re @HaroldAptroot Right. So who exacts replacing -x by (0-x) throughout the code base to silence Microsoft's warnings?

2025-01-31 01:20:12

Re @HaroldAptroot Right. So who exacts replacing -x by (0-x) throughout the code base to silence Microsoft's warnings?

Re @GrassBladeDew No. I do not work in 'corporate'. Never did. :-)

2025-01-31 00:50:30

Re @GrassBladeDew No. I do not work in 'corporate'. Never did. :-)

Re I wonder whether @ID_AA_Carmack would defend the examples I outline in my article: https://x.com/lemire/status/1884799906558456043 To be clear, wha...

2025-01-31 00:50:10

Re I wonder whether @ID_AA_Carmack would defend the examples I outline in my article:

https://x.com/lemire/status/1884799906558456043

To be clear, what he must defend is that it is a good use of programmer time to silence warnings that are false positive (meaning that the initial code is fine and the warning is issued because the tool is flawed).

I am skeptical that he would defend this stance... but if he does, I'd like to talk with him.



Daniel Lemire: http://x.com/i/article/1884799231854018560