2026-02-24 21:01:47
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
In 2026, 85% of babies worldwide will be born in just two continents: Asia and Africa.
Where someone is born can shape everything from access to education and healthcare to long-term economic opportunity.
This map shows how global births are distributed across continents, based on population projections from the United Nations.
Asia is expected to see about 64.9 million births in 2026, accounting for roughly 49% of all births worldwide. Despite declining fertility rates in countries like China, Japan, and South Korea, Asia’s sheer population size keeps it at the center of global demographics.
| Continent | Births (millions) | Share of Global Births |
|---|---|---|
| Asia | 64.9 M | 49.0% |
| Africa | 47.6 M | 35.9% |
| Europe | 6.1 M | 4.6% |
| Latin America & the Caribbean | 9.3 M | 7.0% |
| North America | 4.0 M | 3.0% |
| Oceania | 0.7 M | 0.5% |
| Antarctica | 0.0 M | 0.0% |
| World | 132.5 M | 100% |
South and Southeast Asia, in particular, continue to contribute large numbers of births each year. As a result, nearly one in every two people born in 2026 will be born somewhere in Asia.
Africa is projected to record 47.6 million births in 2026, representing 35.9% of the global total. This reflects the continent’s high fertility rates and young population structure.
Many African countries are still early in their demographic transitions, with limited declines in birth rates so far. As population growth accelerates, Africa’s share of global births has been rising steadily and is projected to increase further later this century.
All other continents account for a relatively small share of global births.
Latin America and the Caribbean are expected to see 9.3 million births, or 7% of the total, while Europe accounts for just 4.6%. North America’s share stands at 3%, reflecting lower fertility rates despite population growth driven by migration. Oceania contributes 0.5% of births, and Antarctica, with no permanent population, records no births at all.
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out The World’s Safest (and Least Safe) Countries on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.
2026-02-24 06:43:49
See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app.
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Governments around the world are moving to set minimum ages for social media use, citing concerns about online safety and youth mental health.
While approaches differ, most policies focus on preventing children below a certain age—typically 15 or 16—from holding accounts, or requiring parental consent and age verification before access is granted.
This map highlights 15 countries and two U.S. states that have enacted or are formally considering legal age thresholds for social media platforms, leveraging data from BBC, Reuters, Euro Weekly.
Australia made history when its social media ban, a world first, came into force in December 2025. Other countries have since followed suit.
The data table below shows the countries and U.S. states that have passed or are discussing social media restrictions, along with the age group that would be affected:
| Country | Regulation Status | Age Threshold |
|---|---|---|
 Australia |
Passed | Under 16 |
 Greece |
In discussion | Under 15 |
 France |
Passed | Under 15 |
 Spain |
In discussion | Under 16 |
 Portugal |
Passed | Under 16 |
 Norway |
In discussion | Under 15 |
 Malaysia |
Passed | Under 16 |
 United Kingdom |
In discussion | Under 16 |
 Denmark |
In discussion | Under 15 |
 Czechia |
In discussion | Under 15 |
 Slovenia |
In discussion | Under 15 |
 Germany |
In discussion | Under 16 |
 Italy |
In discussion | Under 15 |
 Indonesia |
In discussion | Under 16 |
 New Zealand |
In discussion | Under 16 |
 Nebraska |
Passed | Under 18 |
|
Virginia |
Passed | Under 16 |
Australia’s legislation prevents under-16s from accessing social media, including the largest platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube; those who already had accounts were signed out and banned when the law came into force. Social media companies face a fine of up to A$34.9 million if they fail to take “reasonable steps” for age verification.
France’s Assembly, its lower house, voted in favor of creating a statutory minimum age of 15 for social media. The proposed law now needs to be passed in the French Senate, or the upper house. Portugal mandated “express and verified parental consent” for anyone under 16 to use social media in a newly-approved bill, while having an outright ban for children under 13.
Across Europe, additional proposals are under discussion in countries including Greece, Spain, Denmark, Norway, Germany, Italy, Slovenia, and Czechia.
Outside Europe, Malaysia has passed age-based restrictions, while Indonesia and New Zealand are considering similar measures. The United Kingdom is also reviewing potential age-limit policies.
In the United States, states have adopted a range of policies.
Virginia introduced a law limiting social media use for minors under 16 to one hour per day by default, unless parental consent is provided.
Nebraska passed legislation aimed at restricting certain platform features for minors, including design elements such as infinite scrolling and autoplay that are intended to increase engagement.
Utah, legislating in 2023, was actually the first to require age verification for under-18s, however the legislation was repealed and replaced with less stringent requirements.
Many of the recent proposals are concentrated in Europe, where regulators have historically taken a more active role in technology and privacy policy. However, the approaches vary widely and do not always amount to outright bans.
It comes amid increasing concern around social media’s impacts on young people, who spend 7.5 hours online per day, according to the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
Independent evidence suggests that excessive social media use can be harmful, while internal research by Facebook, now Meta, found Instagram made some teenage girls feel worse about their bodies. At the same time, independent researchers have called for more nuanced studies that account for socioeconomic factors, age differences, and specific platform use.
Originally developed as a way to connect with friends, social media platforms have also faced criticism over engagement-driven business models built around advertising. The recent wave of age-based laws reflects a broader shift toward increased regulatory oversight of the sector.
To learn more about the social media ecosystem, check out this graphic which breaks down ad spending on social media platforms.
2026-02-24 02:36:36
Before households feel inflation at the checkout line, it often starts much earlier in the supply chain. When businesses face rising input costs, those pressures can ripple outward, shaping everything from grocery bills to construction budgets.
Created in partnership with Terzo, this graphic shows where business price hikes have been the most intense. It’s part of our Markets in a Minute series, which delivers quick economic insights for executives.
We’ve used data from the Producer Price Index, which tracks the prices businesses pay for inputs like raw materials, energy, and intermediate goods. The table below shows which commodities had the biggest price hikes in 2025.
| Commodity | Category | Dec. 2024 to Dec. 2025 Price Increase |
|---|---|---|
| Wholesale Turkey | Food & Agriculture | 70% |
| Primary Metals* | Metals | 62% |
| Metal Ores* | Metals | 47% |
| Recycled Metals* | Metals | 31% |
| Aluminum Products | Metals | 31% |
| Aluminum Scrap | Metals | 25% |
| Wholesale Beef | Food & Agriculture | 21% |
| Copper Scrap | Metals | 20% |
| Industrial Gases | Chemical & Industrial | 18% |
| Nitrogen Fertilizers | Chemical & Industrial | 18% |
| Steel Products | Metals | 17% |
| Portfolio Management | Services | 17% |
| Fluid Power Equipment** | Chemical & Industrial | 16% |
| Wire and Cable* | Metals | 15% |
| Inedible Fats & Oils | Food & Agriculture | 14% |
*Excluding iron and steel. **Uses pressurized liquid or gas. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, data as of December 2025.
One standout: turkeys. Businesses saw wholesale prices rise by 70% in the last year, driven by bird flu outbreaks that reduced supply. Businesses using turkey as a core input, such as deli meat producers, frozen meal manufacturers, and pet food companies will be hit particularly hard.
Turkey inflation has also impacted grocers, but companies typically have not passed these prices on to consumers around Thanksgiving. Many retailers treat turkeys as a loss leader, absorbing higher costs to draw shoppers into their stores.
Notably, eight of the top 15 biggest price hikes are related to metals. Aluminum prices have been pushed higher by energy-intensive smelting costs, tariffs that have reduced supply, and high demand for the metal in everything from vehicles to AI data centers.
Copper has also seen high inflation, driven by tight supply just as demand accelerates from electrification, power grids, and renewable energy infrastructure.
Analysts are mixed on what they see coming for copper prices. While Goldman Sachs predicts that copper prices will decline in 2026, J.P. Morgan Global Research expects the rally to continue.
To navigate this complexity, leading businesses are turning to smarter tools. Terzo’s all-in-one AI platform, NirvanAI, helps leaders transform company contracts into clear, actionable insights.
See NirvanAI in action and learn how it helps you make decisions with confidence.
Top CFOs are earnings thousands per hour in compensation. Who’s leading the pack, and how much are they making?
This visualization breaks down the U.S. $13.4 trillion ETF market by asset class, showing how ETFs allocate capital across equities, bonds, and more.
Which country led stock markets in 2025? See the biggest shocks, rebounds, and year-end returns in this global recap.
Which global cities are most at risk of a housing bubble? This new map ranks the world’s most overheated real estate markets.
Want AI your team will trust? Pull back the curtain on the top factors that make people believe in artificial intelligence.
Find out how common AI hallucination is for leading models, and what that means for the businesses that rely on them.
Among the dangers of AI, one stands apart as causing trouble for almost a third of companies. What do leaders need to know?
Which university has had the most alumni become entrepreneurs in the last decade? Hint: its not Stanford or Harvard.
In many advanced economies, the number of retirees is climbing while the working-age population shrinks. What are the countries where workers are supporting the most seniors?
The national unemployment rate for the U.S. rose to 4.3% in August 2025. But that figure masks vast differences in local labor market health across states.
A trade war has threatened economic ties in 2025. Which economies are most exposed to these shifts in international trade?
Tariff rates vary by country, as does the value of goods each nation exports to the U.S. Which countries contribute the most?
As the U.S. labor market cools, which industries are still hiring—and which are cutting back their workforces?
Global debt continues to climb, reaching $150T in Q1 2025. Which countries carry the heaviest burdens?
How do Fed rate cuts in the U.S. compare with the interest rate changes in other G7 countries, and what does it mean for business?
Explore the fastest growing jobs by projected growth rate, plus salary insights, in a rapidly changing job market.
This graphic pieces together the $127T global stock market to reveal which countries and regions dominate—and how much equity they control.
The median age of first-time home buyers has reached a historic high. See just how long it’s taking people to get on the property ladder.
The Silent Generation’s share of real estate has dropped dramatically as people age, but how have Baby Boomers, Gen X, and Millennials fared?
Real estate is the biggest industry by GDP in 26 states. Find out why it dominates—and what fuels the rest of the country.
Tariffs are rising to boost American-made goods. Which states gain the most—and least—from manufacturing today?
Collectively, the ten most profitable U.S. companies have a net income of $684 billion—more than the entire GDP of Belgium.
New York City has the highest millionaire population globally. Which other cities attract the world’s wealthiest?
The global economy is expected to have slighter slower growth going forward. Which countries are on track to have the biggest GDP increases?
The U.S. has kept their target rate the same at 4.25-4.50%. What do interest rates look like in other countries amid economic uncertainty?
The national housing market saw a 4.5% rise in house prices. This graphic reveals which states had high price growth, and which didn’t.
If you held a $1,000 investment from 1975-2024, this chart shows how the inflation rate can drastically reduce the value of your money.
Trump cites trade deficits—the U.S. importing more than it exports—as one reason for tariffs. Which countries represent the largest deficits?
2026-02-24 02:31:08
Cyber intrusions rarely follow a single path once attackers get a foothold. Instead, they pivot across systems to widen impact and deepen damage.
This graphic, in partnership with Unit 42 by Palo Alto Networks, shows where attacks occur in cyber intrusions, based on data from the Unit 42 Global Incident Response Report.
Here is a table that breaks intrusions into nine primary attack surfaces observed across investigations.
| Attack Front | Incidents Percentage |
|---|---|
| Identity | 89% |
| Endpoints | 61% |
| Network | 50% |
| Human | 45% |
| 27% | |
| Application | 26% |
| Cloud | 20% |
| SecOps | 10% |
| Database | 1% |
In Unit 42’s sample, 87% of incidents touched at least two surfaces, and 67% hit three or more. Because the categories overlap, a single case can span multiple layers at once.
Identity appears in 89% of cases, making it the most common surface in the dataset. Meanwhile, endpoints (61%) and networks (50%) remain common launch points for lateral movement.
Email (27%) and applications (26%) sit mid-pack, while cloud services appear in 20% of incidents. Still, even “lower” categories matter when attackers chain small wins into bigger access.
Humans show up in 45% of incidents, often through user-driven activity that enables the next pivot.
Multi-surface activity means point solutions can miss context when attackers hop layers. Teams need shared signals across identity, endpoint, network, app, and cloud to spot chained actions early.
SecOps appears in 10% of cases, so attackers sometimes probe security operations tooling and workflows. As a result, integrated detection and response helps contain movement before it reaches databases, which appear in 1% of incidents.
2026-02-23 23:25:43
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Over the past seven decades, Americans’ trust in the federal government has dropped from postwar highs to historic lows. In 1964, 77% said they trusted Washington to do what is right most of the time. As of September 2025, that figure stands at just 17%.
The chart above tracks this long-term shift, using data from Pew Research Center. While trust has occasionally surged during moments of national crisis, the broader trajectory shows a steady erosion across generations.
Trust peaked in 1964, when 77% of Americans said they trusted the federal government most of the time. Even in 1958, nearly three-quarters of the public expressed confidence in the federal government.
That began to change in the late 1960s and early 1970s. By 1970, trust had fallen to 54%, and it slipped further to 36% by 1974 in the aftermath of Watergate. The Vietnam War, political scandals, and economic turbulence reshaped public opinion for decades to come.
| Date | Trust the government (%) |
|---|---|
| 9/28/2025 | 17 |
| 2/9/2025 | 19 |
| 5/19/2024 | 18 |
| 6/11/2023 | 19 |
| 05/01/2022 | 20 |
| 4/11/2021 | 21 |
| 8/2/2020 | 24 |
| 4/12/2020 | 21 |
| 3/25/2019 | 17 |
| 12/04/2017 | 18 |
| 4/11/2017 | 19 |
| 10/04/2015 | 18 |
| 7/20/2014 | 19 |
| 2/26/2014 | 18 |
| 11/15/2013 | 20 |
| 10/13/2013 | 19 |
| 5/31/2013 | 20 |
| 02/06/2013 | 22 |
| 1/13/2013 | 23 |
| 10/31/2012 | 19 |
| 10/19/2011 | 17 |
| 10/04/2011 | 15 |
| 9/23/2011 | 18 |
| 8/21/2011 | 21 |
| 2/28/2011 | 23 |
| 10/21/2010 | 23 |
| 10/01/2010 | 21 |
| 09/06/2010 | 23 |
| 09/01/2010 | 23 |
| 04/05/2010 | 23 |
| 04/05/2010 | 22 |
| 3/21/2010 | 24 |
| 2/12/2010 | 22 |
| 02/05/2010 | 21 |
| 1/10/2010 | 20 |
| 12/20/2009 | 21 |
| 8/31/2009 | 22 |
| 6/12/2009 | 23 |
| 12/21/2008 | 25 |
| 10/15/2008 | 24 |
| 10/13/2008 | 24 |
| 07/09/2007 | 24 |
| 01/09/2007 | 28 |
| 10/08/2006 | 29 |
| 9/15/2006 | 30 |
| 02/05/2006 | 31 |
| 1/20/2006 | 33 |
| 01/06/2006 | 32 |
| 12/02/2005 | 32 |
| 9/11/2005 | 31 |
| 09/09/2005 | 30 |
| 6/19/2005 | 35 |
| 10/15/2004 | 39 |
| 7/15/2004 | 41 |
| 3/21/2004 | 38 |
| 10/26/2003 | 36 |
| 7/27/2003 | 43 |
| 10/15/2002 | 46 |
| 09/04/2002 | 46 |
| 09/02/2002 | 40 |
| 7/13/2002 | 40 |
| 6/17/2002 | 43 |
| 1/24/2002 | 46 |
| 12/07/2001 | 49 |
| 10/25/2001 | 54 |
| 10/06/2001 | 49 |
| 1/17/2001 | 44 |
| 10/31/2000 | 38 |
| 10/15/2000 | 42 |
| 07/09/2000 | 39 |
| 04/02/2000 | 38 |
| 2/14/2000 | 34 |
| 10/03/1999 | 36 |
| 9/14/1999 | 33 |
| 5/16/1999 | 33 |
| 2/21/1999 | 31 |
| 2/12/1999 | 32 |
| 02/04/1999 | 34 |
| 1/10/1999 | 34 |
| 01/03/1999 | 37 |
| 12/01/1998 | 33 |
| 11/15/1998 | 30 |
| 11/01/1998 | 26 |
| 10/26/1998 | 28 |
| 8/10/1998 | 31 |
| 2/22/1998 | 35 |
| 02/01/1998 | 33 |
| 1/25/1998 | 32 |
| 1/19/1998 | 32 |
| 10/31/1997 | 31 |
| 8/27/1997 | 31 |
| 06/01/1997 | 26 |
| 1/14/1997 | 27 |
| 11/02/1996 | 27 |
| 10/15/1996 | 28 |
| 5/12/1996 | 31 |
| 05/06/1996 | 29 |
| 11/19/1995 | 27 |
| 08/07/1995 | 22 |
| 08/05/1995 | 21 |
| 3/19/1995 | 20 |
| 2/22/1995 | 21 |
| 12/01/1994 | 21 |
| 10/29/1994 | 22 |
| 10/23/1994 | 20 |
| 06/06/1994 | 19 |
| 1/30/1994 | 20 |
| 1/20/1994 | 22 |
| 3/24/1993 | 25 |
| 1/17/1993 | 25 |
| 1/14/1993 | 25 |
| 10/23/1992 | 25 |
| 10/15/1992 | 25 |
| 06/08/1992 | 29 |
| 10/20/1991 | 35 |
| 03/06/1991 | 42 |
| 03/01/1991 | 46 |
| 1/27/1991 | 40 |
| 12/01/1990 | 33 |
| 10/28/1990 | 32 |
| 09/06/1990 | 35 |
| 1/16/1990 | 38 |
| 6/29/1989 | 39 |
| 1/15/1989 | 41 |
| 11/10/1988 | 43 |
| 10/15/1988 | 41 |
| 1/23/1988 | 40 |
| 10/18/1987 | 43 |
| 06/01/1987 | 43 |
| 03/01/1987 | 44 |
| 1/21/1987 | 43 |
| 1/19/1987 | 42 |
| 12/01/1986 | 44 |
| 11/30/1986 | 43 |
| 09/09/1986 | 44 |
| 1/19/1986 | 44 |
| 11/06/1985 | 43 |
| 7/29/1985 | 42 |
| 3/21/1985 | 40 |
| 2/27/1985 | 42 |
| 2/22/1985 | 45 |
| 11/14/1984 | 44 |
| 10/15/1984 | 41 |
| 12/01/1982 | 39 |
| 11/07/1980 | 32 |
| 10/15/1980 | 30 |
| 3/12/1980 | 27 |
| 11/03/1979 | 28 |
| 12/01/1978 | 31 |
| 10/23/1977 | 32 |
| 4/25/1977 | 34 |
| 10/15/1976 | 36 |
| 09/05/1976 | 35 |
| 6/15/1976 | 35 |
| 03/01/1976 | 34 |
| 02/08/1976 | 35 |
| 12/01/1974 | 36 |
| 10/15/1972 | 53 |
| 12/01/1970 | 54 |
| 10/15/1968 | 62 |
| 12/01/1966 | 65 |
| 10/15/1964 | 77 |
| 12/01/1958 | 73 |
Although the long-term trend is downward, trust has occasionally rebounded during moments of national unity. After the 9/11 attacks, trust jumped from 44% to 54% in a matter of months. It was one of the last times a majority expressed confidence in Washington.
Similar, though smaller, increases occurred during other crises. In early 2020, trust briefly rose to 24% amid the COVID-19 outbreak. However, these bumps have proven short-lived, with trust quickly returning to lower levels.
Since the mid-2000s, trust in government has rarely crossed the 30% mark. In the 2010s and early 2020s, it often dipped below 20%.
As of September 2025, just 17% of Americans say they trust the federal government most of the time — near the lowest level recorded in Pew’s time series.
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out America’s Growing Mountain of Debt on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.
2026-02-23 21:06:55
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
California alone employs more than half a million tech workers, nearly twice as many as the next closest state.
This map shows where America’s tech jobs are located in 2025, highlighting how heavily the industry is concentrated in just a handful of states.
Figures are based on Bureau of Labor Statistics data via Arizona State University.
Nationwide, tech employment totals roughly 3.2 million workers in 2025.
In the below table, we break down the number of tech jobs in each state, along with its growth rate over the last year.
| Rank | State | Number of Jobs 2025 |
Annual Job Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | California | 524K | -2.8% |
| 2 | New York | 286K | 0.0% |
| 3 | Texas | 226K | -2.0% |
| 4 | Washington | 171K | 3.0% |
| 5 | Florida | 161K | 0.5% |
| 6 | Georgia | 112K | -6.7% |
| 7 | Illinois | 98K | 5.7% |
| 8 | Massachusetts | 92K | 0.3% |
| 9 | Pennsylvania | 88K | -2.0% |
| 10 | North Carolina | 85K | -0.9% |
| 11 | Colorado | 77K | 4.6% |
| 12 | New Jersey | 70K | -4.5% |
| 13 | Virginia | 69K | -4.2% |
| 14 | Ohio | 67K | 1.4% |
| 15 | Michigan | 57K | -0.4% |
| 16 | Tennessee | 55K | -0.7% |
| 17 | Wisconsin | 48K | -1.6% |
| 18 | Arizona | 48K | -0.6% |
| 19 | Missouri | 45K | -2.8% |
| 20 | Utah | 44K | 6.3% |
| 21 | Minnesota | 41K | -4.2% |
| 22 | Oregon | 36K | -0.8% |
| 23 | Maryland | 34K | -1.2% |
| 24 | South Carolina | 31K | 4.8% |
| 25 | Connecticut | 30K | -0.7% |
| 26 | Indiana | 26K | -1.1% |
| 27 | Alabama | 23K | 0.4% |
| 28 | Kentucky | 21K | -1.0% |
| 29 | Nevada | 20K | -0.5% |
| 30 | Oklahoma | 18K | 2.3% |
| 31 | Louisiana | 18K | -4.7% |
| 32 | Iowa | 18K | 0.0% |
| 33 | Kansas | 18K | 2.3% |
| 34 | Nebraska | 17K | -2.3% |
| 35 | Arkansas | 12K | -4.1% |
| 36 | New Hampshire | 11K | -0.9% |
| 37 | Mississippi | 10K | -1.0% |
| 38 | Idaho | 9K | 0.0% |
| 39 | New Mexico | 9K | -11.0% |
| 40 | Hawaii | 8K | -2.4% |
| 41 | West Virginia | 8K | -1.3% |
| 42 | Maine | 8K | -4.8% |
| 43 | North Dakota | 5K | 1.9% |
| 44 | Montana | 5K | -5.3% |
| 45 | South Dakota | 5K | 0.0% |
| 46 | Rhode Island | 5K | -7.1% |
| 47 | Vermont | 4K | -6.5% |
| 48 | Alaska | 4K | -4.7% |
| 49 | Delaware | 4K | 0.0% |
| 50 | Wyoming | 3K | -3.3% |
With 524,000 tech workers, California employs 18% of the nation’s tech workforce across over 61,000 firms.
Still, the state shed thousands of tech jobs last year, given economic uncertainty and the spillover effects of AI. Overall, tech jobs contracted 2.8% in 2025.
New York follows, with 286,000 tech workers, equal to one in 10 jobs nationwide. In 2025, tech job growth was effectively flat.
Ranking in third is Texas, with tech employment standing at 226,000. As a growing tech hub, the state has added over 26,000 roles in the sector since 2020. Last year, however, the number of roles contracted by 2%.
In contrast to these heavyweight states, several smaller tech hubs posted strong job growth. Utah’s tech workforce totals just 44,000, yet employment climbed 6.3% in 2025. Illinois, South Carolina, and Colorado—each with fewer than 100,000 tech jobs—saw gains of 5.8%, 4.8%, and 4.6%, respectively.
To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on the world’s top 50 science and technology clusters.
