2026-02-11 01:10:12
How much biologically productive land and water are required to support a population’s resource use and absorb its waste—and how does this footprint vary around the world?
In collaboration with the Hinrich Foundation, this visualization draws on data from the Global Footprint Network to compare ecological footprints across countries, highlighting the varying environmental pressures of consumption.
The analysis comes from the 2025 Sustainable Trade Index (STI), which the Hinrich Foundation produced in collaboration with the IMD World Competitiveness Center.
The ecological footprint is a metric that quantifies human demand on nature. It calculates the biologically productive land and water area required to supply the renewable resources a given population consumes (such as food, timber, and energy). It also factors in the land needed to assimilate the waste it produces, particularly carbon dioxide.
The metric provides insight into whether a country’s consumption levels are environmentally sustainable. The higher the ecological footprint a country has, the less sustainable its consumption is given its available resources.
It’s no surprise that developed countries typically have larger ecological footprints than emerging markets. With higher levels of consumption—whether energy, goods, or resources—these nations also generate more waste on a per-person basis.
The country with the highest footprint (which translates into a lower ranking) is Singapore, at 10.1 global hectares per person. It’s followed by Canada (8.1), the U.S. (7.5), Australia (7.3), and Russia (6.2).
| From Smallest to Largest Ecological Footprints | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rank | Country | Ecological Footprint (global hectares) |
| 1 |
Bangladesh |
0.68 |
| 2 |
Pakistan |
0.73 |
| 3 |
Myanmar |
1.11 |
| 4 |
India |
1.11 |
| 5 |
Laos |
1.12 |
| 6 |
Papua New Guinea |
1.17 |
| 7 |
Sri Lanka |
1.20 |
| 8 |
Philippines |
1.40 |
| 9 |
Cambodia |
1.64 |
| 10 |
Ecuador |
1.71 |
| 11 |
Indonesia |
1.86 |
| 12 |
Peru |
2.41 |
| 13 |
Thailand |
2.46 |
| 14 |
Mexico |
2.55 |
| 15 |
Vietnam |
2.70 |
| 16 |
China |
3.68 |
| 17 |
United Kingdom |
3.81 |
| 18 |
Japan |
4.04 |
| 19 |
Malaysia |
4.23 |
| 20 |
Chile |
4.27 |
| 21 |
New Zealand |
5.43 |
| 22 |
South Korea |
5.47 |
| 23 |
Russia |
6.21 |
| 24 |
Australia |
7.28 |
| 25 |
United States |
7.48 |
| 26 |
Canada |
8.11 |
| 27 |
Singapore |
10.07 |
Among developed markets, the UK ranks most favorably at #17, with an ecological footprint of 3.8 global hectares per person.
In contrast, emerging economies typically have less resource-intensive lifestyles. As a result, Bangladesh ranks #1 at 0.7 global hectares per person. Pakistan (0.7) and Myanmar (1.1) round out the top three.
This infographic was just a small subset of what the Sustainable Trade Index has to offer. To learn more, visit the Hinrich Foundation, where you can download additional resources including the entire report for free.

Visit the Hinrich Foundation to download the entire report, for free.

Levels of economic development differ not only from one country to another, but also dramatically within their own borders. Which countries lead versus lag?

Based on data from the World Trade Organization, which countries have the highest and lowest number of trade agreements?

Based on the Hinrich Foundation’s 2025 Sustainable Trade Index, which economies are the most and least sustainable?

Trump’s tariffs affect all major U.S. trading partners, but what matters is how each country’s tariffs compare to its competitors.

U.S. tariffs have climbed to an average rate of 18.6%—the highest since 1933. But what does this mean for everyday consumers?

The UN has crunched the numbers projecting the ripple effects of Trump’s May 12th tariffs. Which economies are bracing for the biggest hits?

America’s goods trade deficits have dominated headlines, but a critical part of the equation is being ignored: services trade.

More data will be created, captured, and replicated in the next three years than in the rest of human history. But by how much?

Visual Capitalist has partnered with the Hinrich Foundation to explore the landscape of global trade and find out what students and trade professionals can do to…

CO₂ emissions are reshaping the flows of international trade. Which countries have the highest and lowest CO₂ emissions per capita?

Which countries have the highest and lowest life expectancies at birth?

Based on data from the IMF’s World Economic Outlook, which countries have the highest and lowest government debt ratios?

Based on the Hinrich Foundation’s 2024 Sustainable Trade Index, which economies are the most and least sustainable?

Which countries and regions decreased, banned, or increased Russian oil imports following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine?

The de-dollarization of China’s trade settlements has begun. What patterns do we see in USD and RMB use within China and globally?

Rising geopolitical tensions are shaping the future of international trade, but what is the effect on trading among G7 and BRICS countries?

High resource dependency in trade makes countries more susceptible to market fluctuations and climate change.

This graphic adds visual context to the global education gap, using data from 29 major economies.

This graphic visualizes 30 country’s credit ratings, using data from the 2023 Sustainable Trade Index.

The Sustainable Trade Index 2023 is an annual ranking of the world’s most sustainable economies. View this infographic to see the results.

The Hinrich Foundation visualizes the impact of corporate subsidies by G20 nations between 2008 and Q1 2023.

The Hinrich Foundation explores China’s use of economic coercion and the implications of its control over the solar energy sector.

We analyze recent trade policies implemented by G20 members to determine whether they are liberalizing or harmful.

We highlight key findings from the Hinrich Foundation’s latest report on carbon markets, produced in partnership with Visual Capitalist.

Which economies have hazy air, and which ones enjoy mostly clear skies? Find out in this geographic breakdown of air pollution levels.

Prior to invading Ukraine, Russia had one of the highest levels of geopolitical risk. How does geopolitical uncertainty vary around the world?

The U.S. has by far the most harmful tariffs, with nearly 5,000 in force. Which economy has the least tariffs?

Global trade is growing across regions and countries which is creating an explosion in new jobs and education opportunities.

See which economies have the most sustainable trade policies in the Hinrich Foundation’s 2022 Sustainable Trade Index.

In this infographic, we examine the current state of digital fragmentation and it’s implications on the world.

Asia’s digital economy is expanding quicker than ever, but cooperation between governments is needed to reduce barriers.

Free trade is a powerful engine for economic growth, but rising protectionism stands in the way. See what the data says in this infographic.
2026-02-10 23:41:40
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Since 2019, U.S. household incomes have surged—rising from $68,700 to $83,730 nationally, a 21.9% increase in just five years.
But where you live matters a lot. While some states tracked close to the national average, others saw incomes climb at nearly double the pace, driven by booming local industries and major investment.
States like Colorado posted outsized gains, while Georgia’s expanding EV industry brought billions in investment and rising paychecks.
The map shows which states saw the fastest growth in median household income from 2019 to 2024, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau.
Below, we show the change in median household income for all 50 U.S. states and D.C. between 2019 and 2024 using nominal figures (not adjusted for inflation):
| Rank | State | Change in Median Household Income 2019-2024 |
Median Household Income 2019 | Median Household Income 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Colorado | 46.9% | $72,500 | $106,500 |
| 2 | Georgia | 43.4% | $56,630 | $81,210 |
| 3 | Maine | 36.3% | $66,550 | $90,730 |
| 4 | Montana | 36.1% | $60,190 | $81,920 |
| 5 | Tennessee | 34.0% | $56,630 | $75,860 |
| 6 | Rhode Island | 31.6% | $70,150 | $92,290 |
| 7 | Massachusetts | 29.9% | $87,710 | $113,900 |
| 8 | Florida | 29.6% | $58,370 | $75,630 |
| 9 | Iowa | 29.4% | $66,050 | $85,480 |
| 10 | Missouri | 29.4% | $60,600 | $78,390 |
| 11 | California | 28.8% | $78,100 | $100,600 |
| 12 | New Hampshire | 28.7% | $86,900 | $111,800 |
| 13 | North Dakota | 25.8% | $70,030 | $88,080 |
| 14 | Mississippi | 25.0% | $44,790 | $55,980 |
| 15 | Ohio | 24.5% | $64,660 | $80,520 |
| 16 | South Dakota | 24.3% | $64,260 | $79,850 |
| 17 | Michigan | 23.9% | $64,120 | $79,460 |
| 18 | South Carolina | 23.8% | $62,030 | $76,780 |
| 19 | Idaho | 23.7% | $65,990 | $81,650 |
| 20 | Utah | 23.0% | $84,520 | $104,000 |
| 21 | Wisconsin | 22.6% | $67,350 | $82,560 |
| 22 | New York | 20.8% | $71,850 | $86,830 |
| 23 | Texas | 20.8% | $67,440 | $81,490 |
| 24 | Wyoming | 20.8% | $65,130 | $78,680 |
| 25 | New Mexico | 20.8% | $53,110 | $64,140 |
| 26 | Oregon | 20.5% | $74,410 | $89,700 |
| 27 | Virginia | 20.2% | $81,310 | $97,720 |
| 28 | Kansas | 19.9% | $73,150 | $87,690 |
| 29 | Arizona | 19.9% | $70,670 | $84,700 |
| 30 | Arkansas | 18.9% | $54,540 | $64,840 |
| 31 | Washington | 18.3% | $82,450 | $97,500 |
| 32 | New Jersey | 18.0% | $87,730 | $103,500 |
| 33 | Nebraska | 17.9% | $73,070 | $86,140 |
| 34 | West Virginia | 17.6% | $53,710 | $63,150 |
| 35 | Louisiana | 17.5% | $51,710 | $60,740 |
| 36 | Alabama | 16.7% | $56,200 | $65,560 |
| 37 | Alaska | 16.4% | $78,390 | $91,260 |
| 38 | Kentucky | 16.4% | $55,660 | $64,790 |
| 39 | Delaware | 15.7% | $74,190 | $85,860 |
| 40 | Indiana | 15.0% | $66,690 | $76,710 |
| 41 | Maryland | 14.8% | $95,570 | $109,700 |
| 42 | Vermont | 14.7% | $74,310 | $85,260 |
| 43 | Connecticut | 13.7% | $87,290 | $99,240 |
| 44 | Nevada | 13.7% | $70,910 | $80,590 |
| 45 | Pennsylvania | 13.4% | $70,580 | $80,060 |
| 46 | Minnesota | 13.4% | $81,430 | $92,350 |
| 47 | Illinois | 13.2% | $74,400 | $84,210 |
| 48 | District of Columbia | 12.6% | $93,110 | $104,800 |
| 49 | Hawaii | 11.6% | $88,010 | $98,240 |
| 50 | Oklahoma | 9.9% | $59,400 | $65,310 |
| 51 | North Carolina | 9.9% | $61,160 | $67,220 |
Colorado’s thriving tech industry helped push median income up 46.9%, the fastest rise across states.
With $165,606 in average earnings across the sector in 2023, Colorado ranked sixth-highest nationally. From software to renewable energy, employment growth has expanded by double- or even triple-digit percentages across various roles since 2018.
Georgia ranks in a close second, with median incomes climbing 43.4%. In particular, the EV and aerospace sectors are playing a key role in job creation. Since 2018, the state has seen $27.3 billion in investment across EV, aerospace, and battery manufacturers including Rivian and SK Battery America.
Maine, meanwhile, saw wages rise 36.3%. In 2024, wages across the tech sector saw the steepest jump of 11.4% while those in the construction sector saw strong gains of 8.5%. Other factors, such as its older population and tight labor market, have further boosted wages.
Falling near the middle of the pack were New York and Texas, each with wage gains of 20.8% between 2019 and 2024.
By contrast, North Carolina and Oklahoma saw only 9.9% cumulative wage growth, the weakest performance nationwide. Median household income in both states remains well below the U.S. average and still trails pre-pandemic levels.
To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on average hourly earnings by state in 2025.
2026-02-10 21:06:15
See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app.
View the high-resolution version of this infographic.
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
In 1975, the world’s largest cities were dominated by Japan, Europe, and North America. By 2025, that balance had already shifted toward Asia. Looking ahead to 2050, Africa is projected to emerge as a major force in the global urban hierarchy.
Urbanization has been the driving force behind this transformation—and it’s far from finished.
This visualization tracks how the world’s 50 largest cities have risen, stagnated, or fallen in rank across four points in time—1975, 2000, 2025, and 2050—using data from the UN World Urbanization Prospects 2025.
In 1975, Tokyo and Osaka were the world’s two largest cities, followed by New York, Jakarta, and Mexico City.
By 2000, Asian megacities like Shanghai, Beijing, and New Delhi climbed the rankings as population growth accelerated across Asia. Fast forward to 2025, and the shift has become more pronounced, with many of the world’s largest cities now located in South and East Asia. As urbanization continues, this shift is projected to continue through 2050.
The table below shows the world’s 50 largest cities in 2050, along with their population sizes in 1975, 2000, and 2025:
| 2050 Population Rank | City | Country | 1975 Population | 2000 Population | 2025 Population | 2050 Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dhaka |
Bangladesh |
5,037,174 | 17,434,596 | 36,585,479 | 52,123,000 |
| 2 | Jakarta |
Indonesia |
11,696,369 | 25,591,966 | 41,913,860 | 51,784,000 |
| 3 | Shanghai |
China |
4,542,787 | 14,034,558 | 29,558,908 | 34,912,000 |
| 4 | New Delhi |
India |
6,091,891 | 17,969,092 | 30,222,405 | 33,891,000 |
| 5 | Karachi |
Pakistan |
4,626,701 | 10,799,503 | 21,422,590 | 32,593,000 |
| 6 | Cairo |
Egypt |
7,440,914 | 15,676,619 | 25,566,102 | 32,366,000 |
| 7 | Tokyo |
Japan |
24,281,618 | 30,302,560 | 33,412,512 | 30,658,000 |
| 8 | Guangzhou |
China |
1,644,240 | 18,970,258 | 27,563,372 | 29,243,000 |
| 9 | Manila |
Philippines |
8,329,012 | 17,799,064 | 24,735,305 | 27,120,000 |
| 10 | Kolkata |
India |
10,527,605 | 18,355,286 | 22,549,738 | 23,768,000 |
| 11 | Mumbai |
India |
8,338,773 | 15,952,862 | 20,203,056 | 23,059,000 |
| 12 | Seoul |
Republic of Korea |
10,079,046 | 18,962,544 | 22,490,482 | 21,225,000 |
| 13 | Bangkok |
Thailand |
3,650,772 | 8,377,066 | 18,180,280 | 20,462,000 |
| 14 | Lahore |
Pakistan |
4,402,766 | 7,978,805 | 15,156,430 | 20,388,000 |
| 15 | Luanda |
Angola |
306,000 | 714,643 | 11,370,127 | 20,286,000 |
| 16 | São Paulo |
Brazil |
10,536,121 | 16,702,008 | 18,949,790 | 18,217,000 |
| 17 | Beijing |
China |
5,154,971 | 9,635,380 | 17,013,303 | 18,004,000 |
| 18 | Mexico City |
Mexico |
11,119,402 | 17,598,162 | 17,734,212 | 17,679,000 |
| 19 | Ho Chi Minh City |
Vietnam |
2,384,034 | 6,006,090 | 14,052,713 | 17,201,000 |
| 20 | Istanbul |
Türkiye |
5,305,193 | 10,633,602 | 15,014,763 | 16,303,000 |
| 21 | Lagos |
Nigeria |
2,612,450 | 7,908,961 | 12,791,699 | 16,180,000 |
| 22 | Moscow |
Russian Federation |
8,520,842 | 11,194,627 | 14,524,753 | 15,522,000 |
| 23 | Shenzhen |
China |
487,944 | 8,180,960 | 13,878,396 | 14,661,000 |
| 24 | Bengaluru |
India |
2,369,541 | 6,051,928 | 13,187,098 | 14,258,000 |
| 25 | Buenos Aires |
Argentina |
8,560,900 | 11,711,634 | 14,017,736 | 14,236,000 |
| 26 | Los Angeles |
United States |
7,717,837 | 11,195,626 | 12,740,420 | 13,862,000 |
| 27 | Hajipur |
India |
745,962 | 3,363,805 | 9,941,510 | 13,695,000 |
| 28 | New York City |
United States |
12,076,416 | 13,044,483 | 13,920,148 | 13,225,000 |
| 29 | Kinshasa |
DR Congo |
1,035,622 | 5,328,174 | 10,943,641 | 13,211,000 |
| 30 | Dar es Salaam |
Tanzania |
299,151 | 2,071,645 | 7,795,114 | 13,160,000 |
| 31 | Bogotá |
Colombia |
3,389,750 | 6,340,840 | 10,624,315 | 12,478,000 |
| 32 | Lima |
Peru |
3,519,785 | 6,991,685 | 10,580,241 | 12,358,000 |
| 33 | London |
United Kingdom |
7,369,842 | 7,654,553 | 10,416,420 | 11,869,000 |
| 34 | Chennai |
India |
4,484,115 | 7,612,508 | 11,153,205 | 11,757,000 |
| 35 | Addis Ababa |
Ethiopia |
868,901 | 2,791,724 | 6,705,705 | 10,783,000 |
| 36 | Kuala Lumpur |
Malaysia |
170,777 | 4,143,915 | 8,443,731 | 10,627,000 |
| 37 | Osaka |
Japan |
14,448,054 | 14,487,830 | 12,964,145 | 10,449,000 |
| 38 | Abidjan |
Côte d’Ivoire |
1,024,745 | 3,441,806 | 6,621,711 | 9,775,000 |
| 39 | Bandung |
Indonesia |
3,475,759 | 6,333,411 | 8,909,104 | 9,747,000 |
| 40 | Hangzhou |
China |
1,113,616 | 4,964,897 | 7,500,208 | 9,625,000 |
| 41 | Hyderabad |
India |
2,810,479 | 6,340,661 | 9,190,795 | 9,546,000 |
| 42 | Tehran |
Iran |
4,265,101 | 6,999,195 | 9,174,964 | 9,499,000 |
| 43 | Khartoum |
Sudan |
870,553 | 4,135,102 | 6,809,355 | 9,444,000 |
| 44 | Paris |
France |
7,423,859 | 8,385,156 | 9,381,921 | 9,326,000 |
| 45 | Rio de Janeiro |
Brazil |
5,880,669 | 8,416,754 | 9,500,336 | 9,300,000 |
| 46 | Riyadh |
Saudi Arabia |
126,000 | 2,557,269 | 6,916,417 | 9,153,000 |
| 47 | Alexandria |
Egypt |
2,647,675 | 4,477,718 | 7,266,957 | 9,023,000 |
| 48 | Johannesburg |
South Africa |
1,180,560 | 2,767,803 | 7,077,175 | 8,916,000 |
| 49 | Onitsha |
Nigeria |
756,883 | 2,353,086 | 5,627,706 | 8,681,000 |
| 50 | Yaoundé |
Cameroon |
455,219 | 1,578,631 | 5,106,087 | 8,661,000 |
Looking ahead to 2050, Dhaka is projected to be the world’s most populous city with over 52 million residents, followed closely by Jakarta. Asian cities are projected to remain population hubs, with Shanghai, New Delhi, and Karachi rounding out the top five, and the Asian continent accounting for 24 of the 50 largest cities.
Meanwhile, Africa emerges as the fastest-growing urban region in the world, accounting for 13 of the 50 largest cities. Cities such as Lagos, Kinshasa, Cairo, and Dar es Salaam are projected to see explosive population growth over the coming decades, driven by high fertility rates and urbanization.
Overall, the number of megacities, those with over 10 million inhabitants, is projected to increase to 37, up from 33 megacities in 2025.
While cities in emerging markets surge, many historically large cities in Europe, Japan, and North America are projected to grow relatively slowly, or even plateau.
For example, Osaka’s population is projected to decline by 2.5 million, or 20%, and New York’s by 5%. Other large metros including Tokyo, Paris, and Seoul, are expected to hit similar population plateaus.
However, despite slow growth, these cities are likely to remain global economic powerhouses, supported by long histories of commercial and economic activity.
If you enjoyed this infographic, explore more insights on Voronoi, including The Countries Set to Double Their Population the Fastest.
2026-02-10 01:12:00
See this visualization first on the Voronoi app.
Hospital brand strength increasingly shapes patient choice, clinician recruitment, and institutional prestige. As a result, only a handful of countries are home to a large share of the world’s strongest hospital brands.
This map shows how many hospital brands each country has in the global top 100, based on Brand Finance’s Global Top 250 Hospitals 2026 report.
Brand Finance scores more than 500 academic medical centers using a Brand Strength Index of 30+ metrics, drawing on surveys of 2,500 healthcare professionals.
Below is a table showing how many hospital brands each country has in the global top 100.
| Country | Hospitals |
|---|---|
United States |
25 |
United Kingdom |
8 |
Australia |
5 |
Saudi Arabia |
4 |
Japan |
4 |
Germany |
4 |
Canada |
4 |
Bangladesh |
3 |
Singapore |
3 |
Brazil |
3 |
Spain |
3 |
Qatar |
3 |
France |
3 |
India |
3 |
Colombia |
3 |
Morocco |
2 |
Indonesia |
2 |
South Korea |
2 |
Argentina |
2 |
Egypt |
2 |
South Africa |
2 |
UAE |
2 |
Sweden |
1 |
Netherlands |
1 |
Switzerland |
1 |
Ireland |
1 |
China |
1 |
Bahrain |
1 |
Sri Lanka |
1 |
Pakistan |
1 |
North America leads the top 100 by a wide margin. The region has 29 hospitals in total. The U.S. accounts for 25 entries, while Canada adds four.
In the lead, Johns Hopkins Medicine ranks first overall for the second year in a row. Meanwhile, four other American hospitals appear in the top 10.
The United Kingdom has eight hospitals in the global top 100. That concentration makes the U.K. one of Europe’s strongest performers on the map.
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust ranks #2 globally, while Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust ranks #9.
Six other U.K. hospitals join them in the top 100 worldwide.
The Middle East and North Africa also show strong representation. Saudi Arabia’s King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre leads the region at #12 globally.
Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi ranks #23 globally, providing another example of a top 100 hospital. In total, 14 MENA hospitals appear in the global top 100.
Reputation spreads through professional networks. As a result, stronger brands can build trust and attract talent.
For hospitals, reputation is not just perception—it can shape patient choices, clinician careers, and long-term global standing.
To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on investment peaks by industry.
The data for this visualization was sourced from Global Top 250 Hospitals 2025 Report, a publication by one of our data partners, Brand Finance. Our data partnerships are commercial agreements that may or may not include compensation, and partners are not involved with our editorial or graphical processes in any capacity.
2026-02-09 23:42:01
See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app.
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Global military spending is often measured in massive national budgets, where the United States and China dominate the conversation. But looking at defense spending on a per-person basis tells a very different story, one where smaller countries rise to the top.
This visualization ranks major countries by how much they spent on defense per citizen in 2024, revealing which nations invest the most in military power relative to their population — and how countries like the U.S. compare when spending is measured per person rather than in total dollars.
Data comes from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).
Israel ranks first, spending nearly $5,000 per person on defense in 2024. This figure reflects the country’s ongoing security challenges and mandatory military service. Despite a total defense budget of $47 billion—small compared to global superpowers—the per-person cost is unmatched.
Below are the world’s 30 largest military spenders, ranked by defense spending per capita:
| Rank | Country | Total Spend (2024) | Per Capita |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Israel |
$47B | $4,989 |
| 2 |
U.S. |
$997B | $2,895 |
| 3 |
Singapore |
$15B | $2,591 |
| 4 |
Saudi Arabia |
$80B | $2,386 |
| 5 |
Norway |
$10B | $1,880 |
| 6 |
Ukraine |
$65B | $1,728 |
| 7 |
Denmark |
$10B | $1,670 |
| 8 |
Kuwait |
$8B | $1,596 |
| 9 |
Netherlands |
$23B | $1,276 |
| 10 |
Australia |
$34B | $1,272 |
| 11 |
Finland |
$7B | $1,245 |
| 12 |
United Kingdom |
$82B | $1,186 |
| 13 |
Sweden |
$12B | $1,138 |
| 14 |
Germany |
$88B | $1,044 |
| 15 |
Russia |
$149B | $1,026 |
| 16 |
Poland |
$38B | $982 |
| 17 |
France |
$65B | $973 |
| 18 |
South Korea |
$48B | $919 |
| 19 |
Canada |
$29B | $742 |
| 20 |
Taiwan |
$16B | $708 |
| 21 |
Italy |
$38B | $639 |
| 22 |
Spain |
$25B | $514 |
| 23 |
Algeria |
$22B | $469 |
| 24 |
Japan |
$55B | $446 |
| 25 |
Türkiye |
$25B | $292 |
| 26 |
Colombia |
$15B | $287 |
| 27 |
China |
$314B | $221 |
| 28 |
Mexico |
$17B | $128 |
| 29 |
Brazil |
$21B | $99 |
| 30 |
Indonesia |
$11B | $39 |
Several smaller or wealthy nations rank near the top of the list. Singapore spends over $2,500 per person, driven by its strategic location and emphasis on technological superiority. Norway and Denmark also appear in the top 10, supported by high incomes and growing commitments to NATO.
The U.S. ranks second overall, with nearly $2,900 spent per person, reflecting both its enormous military budget and large population. China, by contrast, ranks much lower at $221 per capita despite spending more than $300 billion in total.
Meanwhile, European powers like Germany, France, and the U.K. cluster in the middle of the ranking, balancing defense commitments with larger populations.
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Ranked: Countries With the Highest Cost of Violence on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.
2026-02-09 21:06:57
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
How does the cost of living vary across countries in 2026?
To find out, this graphic visualizes Numbeo’s Global Cost of Living Index, which measures the price of everyday expenses, including rent, relative to New York City (baseline of 100).
If a country has an index score of 80, prices are 20% lower than in New York. Scores above 100 indicate higher everyday costs.
While inflation has eased in many regions, the cost of living remains a major global challenge. Across 28 countries, home prices have risen more than 50% since 2020, and grocery costs have risen sharply in countries such as Mexico, Germany, and Malaysia, continuing to strain household budgets worldwide.
Below, we show the cost of living index for 155 countries or territories in 2026, highlighting stark differences in everyday costs around the world.
Bermuda has the highest cost of living worldwide, a British Overseas Territory synonymous with high-end real estate, luxury tourism, and offshore wealth.
| Rank | Country | Cost of Living Index 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Bermuda |
123.5 |
| 2 |
Cayman Islands |
97.9 |
| 3 |
Switzerland |
84.3 |
| 4 |
U.S. Virgin Islands |
82.5 |
| 5 |
Singapore |
81.2 |
| 6 |
Bahamas |
77.1 |
| 7 |
Iceland |
75.9 |
| 8 |
Jersey |
72.5 |
| 9 |
Hong Kong |
69.8 |
| 10 |
Solomon Islands |
65.4 |
| 11 |
Guernsey |
65.3 |
| 12 |
Luxembourg |
65.2 |
| 13 |
Gibraltar |
63.9 |
| 14 |
Norway |
59.4 |
| 15 |
Ireland |
58.7 |
| 16 |
Israel |
58 |
| 17 |
Netherlands |
57.9 |
| 18 |
Denmark |
56.6 |
| 19 |
United States |
56.3 |
| 20 |
Isle Of Man |
55.7 |
| 21 |
Australia |
52.7 |
| 22 |
United Kingdom |
51.9 |
| 23 |
Austria |
50.7 |
| 24 |
Grenada |
49.4 |
| 25 |
Germany |
49 |
| 26 |
Canada |
48.9 |
| 27 |
Belgium |
48.6 |
| 28 |
United Arab Emirates |
48.2 |
| 29 |
Finland |
48 |
| 30 |
Seychelles |
48 |
| 31 |
Sweden |
47.8 |
| 32 |
France |
47.5 |
| 33 |
Macao (China) |
46.3 |
| 34 |
Qatar |
45.8 |
| 35 |
Andorra |
45.2 |
| 36 |
New Zealand |
45 |
| 37 |
Cyprus |
44.6 |
| 38 |
Puerto Rico |
44.3 |
| 39 |
Malta |
44.1 |
| 40 |
Italy |
43.1 |
| 41 |
Democratic Republic of the Congo |
42.4 |
| 42 |
South Korea |
41.3 |
| 43 |
Estonia |
40.5 |
| 44 |
Papua New Guinea |
39.2 |
| 45 |
Slovenia |
39.1 |
| 46 |
Spain |
39 |
| 47 |
Guyana |
39 |
| 48 |
Jamaica |
38.7 |
| 49 |
Czech Republic |
38.6 |
| 50 |
Costa Rica |
38.3 |
| 51 |
Portugal |
38.3 |
| 52 |
Maldives |
38.1 |
| 53 |
Uruguay |
37.3 |
| 54 |
Croatia |
37.1 |
| 55 |
Greece |
36 |
| 56 |
Bahrain |
35.9 |
| 57 |
Panama |
35.6 |
| 58 |
Senegal |
35.5 |
| 59 |
Lithuania |
35.3 |
| 60 |
Trinidad And Tobago |
35.2 |
| 61 |
Slovakia |
35.2 |
| 62 |
Ivory Coast |
34.5 |
| 63 |
Angola |
34.5 |
| 64 |
Poland |
34.4 |
| 65 |
Latvia |
34.3 |
| 66 |
Taiwan |
33.9 |
| 67 |
Brunei |
33.6 |
| 68 |
Kuwait |
33.3 |
| 69 |
Japan |
32.8 |
| 70 |
Hungary |
32.3 |
| 71 |
Yemen |
32 |
| 72 |
Belize |
32 |
| 73 |
Albania |
31.7 |
| 74 |
Mexico |
31.5 |
| 75 |
Ethiopia |
31.3 |
| 76 |
Cameroon |
31.1 |
| 77 |
Montenegro |
31 |
| 78 |
Palestine |
30.9 |
| 79 |
Saudi Arabia |
30.4 |
| 80 |
Oman |
30 |
| 81 |
Cape Verde |
29.6 |
| 82 |
Serbia |
29.5 |
| 83 |
Lebanon |
29.5 |
| 84 |
Armenia |
29.5 |
| 85 |
Guatemala |
29.5 |
| 86 |
El Salvador |
29.4 |
| 87 |
Cuba |
28.3 |
| 88 |
Argentina |
28.3 |
| 89 |
Suriname |
28.2 |
| 90 |
Bulgaria |
28 |
| 91 |
Romania |
27.8 |
| 92 |
Turkey |
27.6 |
| 93 |
Dominican Republic |
27.4 |
| 94 |
Thailand |
27.2 |
| 95 |
Chile |
26.8 |
| 96 |
Fiji |
26.7 |
| 97 |
South Africa |
26.4 |
| 98 |
Namibia |
26.4 |
| 99 |
Moldova |
26.4 |
| 100 |
Mauritius |
26.1 |
| 101 |
Myanmar |
26 |
| 102 |
Mozambique |
25.9 |
| 103 |
Honduras |
25.7 |
| 104 |
Russia |
25.7 |
| 105 |
Nigeria |
25.5 |
| 106 |
Jordan |
25.3 |
| 107 |
Mongolia |
25.1 |
| 108 |
Bosnia And Herzegovina |
25 |
| 109 |
Zimbabwe |
24.2 |
| 110 |
Venezuela |
24 |
| 111 |
Georgia |
24 |
| 112 |
Cambodia |
23.7 |
| 113 |
Ghana |
23.7 |
| 114 |
Peru |
23.6 |
| 115 |
North Macedonia |
23.2 |
| 116 |
Malaysia |
22.9 |
| 117 |
Nicaragua |
22.5 |
| 118 |
Colombia |
22.4 |
| 119 |
Sri Lanka |
22 |
| 120 |
Zambia |
22 |
| 121 |
Belarus |
21.5 |
| 122 |
China |
21.5 |
| 123 |
Kazakhstan |
21.4 |
| 124 |
Azerbaijan |
21.3 |
| 125 |
Morocco |
21.1 |
| 126 |
Botswana |
21 |
| 127 |
Ecuador |
21 |
| 128 |
Uzbekistan |
20.6 |
| 129 |
Brazil |
20.5 |
| 130 |
Kyrgyzstan |
20.4 |
| 131 |
Paraguay |
20.3 |
| 132 |
Philippines |
20.2 |
| 133 |
Tajikistan |
19.8 |
| 134 |
Uganda |
19.6 |
| 135 |
Kosovo (Disputed Territory) |
19.5 |
| 136 |
Kenya |
19.5 |
| 137 |
Rwanda |
19.4 |
| 138 |
Ukraine |
19.2 |
| 139 |
Vietnam |
19.1 |
| 140 |
Iraq |
19 |
| 141 |
Bolivia |
19 |
| 142 |
Tanzania |
18.8 |
| 143 |
Tunisia |
18.5 |
| 144 |
Indonesia |
18.5 |
| 145 |
Algeria |
17.1 |
| 146 |
Iran |
16.2 |
| 147 |
Syria |
16.1 |
| 148 |
Madagascar |
15.8 |
| 149 |
Bangladesh |
13.8 |
| 150 |
Nepal |
13.8 |
| 151 |
Egypt |
13.8 |
| 152 |
Afghanistan |
12.7 |
| 153 |
Pakistan |
12.4 |
| 154 |
India |
12.4 |
| 155 |
Libya |
12.3 |
Many of the world’s most expensive places, in terms of cost of living, are islands and often tax shelters or financial centers. The U.S. Virgin Islands, Jersey, and Cayman Islands all make the top 10 in the cost of living index. High concentrations of wealth, combined with heavy reliance on imports, push up prices across these island economies.
Switzerland ranks third overall, with Zurich named the world’s most expensive city in 2026. Beyond a strong Swiss franc, high wages and elevated living standards significantly drive up costs.
Singapore has the highest cost of living in Asia, placing fifth worldwide. Limited land availability has fueled high real estate prices, while the country’s reliance on imports—around 90% of its food—adds further cost pressures.
The U.S. ranks 19th globally, with a cost of living index score of 56.3. By comparison, the global median index score in 2026 stands at 30.8.
To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on the world’s most unaffordable housing markets.