MoreRSS

site iconVisual CapitalistModify

By highlighting the bigger picture through data-driven visuals, we stay true to our mission to help cut through the clutter and simplify a complex world.
Please copy the RSS to your reader, or quickly subscribe to:

Inoreader Feedly Follow Feedbin Local Reader

Rss preview of Blog of Visual Capitalist

Ranked: What Europeans Are Most Proud Of

2026-04-25 13:02:31

Ranked: What Makes Europeans Most Proud of Their Country?

Key Takeaways

  • Culture, people, and history are the top drivers of national pride across Europe.
  • The UK (29%) and Hungary (23%) stand out for high levels of negative sentiment.
  • Sweden is a major outlier, with 53% citing politics as a source of pride.

What people take pride in says a lot about how they see their country.

Across Europe, those sources range from culture and history to political systems and personal freedoms. But in some countries, a notable share of people say they feel little pride at all.

This visualization by The European Correspondent, based on Pew Research Center data, breaks down the top three sources of national pride in each country surveyed.

Top Sources of National Pride, by Country

Here’s a closer look at the top three sources of national pride cited by adults in each country:

Country Top Source Second Source Third Source
🇸🇪 Sweden Politics (53%) Landscape (32%) People (26%)
🇮🇹 Italy Culture (38%) Landscape (24%) People (23%)
🇬🇷 Greece History (37%) People (31%) Negative feeling (19%)
🇩🇪 Germany Politics (36%) Economy (18%) Freedom (16%)
🇪🇸 Spain People (32%) Negative feeling (25%) Culture (16%)
🇬🇧 UK Negative feeling (29%) People (25%) Politics (22%)
🇫🇷 France Culture (26%) People (24%) Freedom (22%)
🇳🇱 Netherlands Freedom (24%) Economy (21%) Politics (21%)
🇭🇺 Hungary Negative feeling (23%) History (21%) People (20%)
🇵🇱 Poland Identity (21%) History (20%) People (18%)
🇹🇷 Türkiye People (20%) History (12%) Identity (10%)

Culture dominates in countries like Italy (38%) and France (26%), while history plays a major role in Greece (37%). Meanwhile, Sweden stands out with 53% citing politics—by far the highest single-category share.

The Core Drivers of Pride Across Europe

In much of Europe, national pride is rooted in shared identity and heritage. Southern European countries like Italy and Greece emphasize culture and history, reflecting their deep historical legacies and global cultural influence.

Elsewhere, people themselves are a key source of pride. Spain (32%) and France (24%) rank highly in this category, suggesting a strong sense of national community and social cohesion.

Where National Pride Is Weakest

Not all sentiment is positive. In the UK, 29% of respondents cite “negative feeling” when describing their country, which is higher than any single positive category. Hungary (23%) and Spain (25%) also show notable shares of dissatisfaction.

This aligns with broader research. According to Pew, individuals who express less pride are often those who do not identify with the governing political parties. In the UK specifically, findings from British Social Attitudes surveys suggest national identity has become more fragmented in recent years, often tied to political divisions.

These dynamics help explain why politics can be both a source of pride—as in Sweden—and frustration, as seen elsewhere.

Politics as a Source of Pride—and Division

Sweden stands out sharply, with 53% of respondents citing politics as a source of pride, which is the highest share of any single category in the dataset.

Germany (36%) follows at a distance. Meanwhile, in other countries, political dissatisfaction helps explain rising negative sentiment, particularly among those who feel disconnected from leadership.

U.S. Birth Rates Still Haven’t Recovered From 2007

2026-04-24 23:26:52

See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app.

Graphic showing how U.S. birth rate hit record low in 2025, continuing a decades-long decline.

Use This Visualization

U.S. Birth Rates Still Haven’t Recovered From 2007

See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. birth rates hit a record low in 2025, down 23% from their recent local peak in 2007.
  • The sharpest drop followed the 2008 financial crisis, and rates have never fully recovered.
  • Short-lived rebounds, including after COVID-19, have not reversed the long-term decline.

The U.S. birth rate hit another record low in 2025.

This chart tracks births per 1,000 women ages 15–44 from 2000 to 2025, based on CDC data with additional reporting from CNN.

It highlights a clear turning point after 2007, when birth rates spiked, and shows how economic shocks like the Great Recession and COVID-19 accelerated a trend that has yet to reverse.

The Peak Before a Long Decline

By 2007, U.S. birth rates reached 69.3 births per 1,000 women, the highest level in the dataset. This marked a clear inflection point. Birth rates then began a sustained decline that continues through 2025.

Year Births per 1,000 Women (ages 15 to 44)
2000 65.9
2001 65.1
2002 65
2003 66.1
2004 66.4
2005 66.7
2006 68.6
2007 69.3
2008 68.1
2009 66.2
2010 64.1
2011 63.2
2012 63
2013 62.5
2014 62.9
2015 62.5
2016 62
2017 60.3
2018 59.1
2019 58.3
2020 55.7
2021 56.3
2022 56
2023 54.5
2024 53.8
2025 53.1

The Lasting Impact of the Great Recession

The 2008 financial crisis triggered the steepest sustained drop in modern U.S. birth rates. Between 2007 and 2013, the rate fell by nearly 10%, as economic uncertainty led many households to delay or forgo having children. Unlike previous downturns, this decline proved persistent, even after the economy recovered.

Part of this sustained decline was driven by falling birth rates among immigrant women, a group that had previously supported higher overall fertility levels.

Pandemic Dip and Record Lows

The continued decline has significant long-term implications. Fewer births today mean slower population growth and a smaller future workforce, trends that could reshape economic growth, entitlement systems, and demographic balance in the decades ahead.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

If you enjoyed today’s post, check out U.S. Childcare Cost Higher Than In Other Developed Countries on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.

Ranked: The Smartest AI Models of 2026

2026-04-24 21:38:40

Ranked: The Smartest AI Models of 2026

See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Key Takeaways

  • Grok-4.20 Expert Mode and OpenAI GPT 5.4 Pro (Vision) tie for the top spot in TrackingAI’s April 2026 Mensa Norway benchmark, each scoring 145.
  • The top tier is getting crowded, with several leading models now separated by only a few points.
  • Scores have risen sharply from 2025, highlighting how quickly frontier AI reasoning has improved on visual pattern-recognition tests.

The race to build smarter AI models is getting tighter at the top.

This visualization, part of Visual Capitalist’s AI Week, sponsored by Terzo, ranks leading systems using data from TrackingAI, which benchmarks models on the Mensa Norway IQ test as of April 2026.

The results show both who leads today and how little now separates the top contenders, with multiple frontier models clustered near the top of the leaderboard.

A Tie at the Top

The ranking offers a snapshot of how today’s leading AI models perform on abstract pattern-recognition tasks, and just how close the race has become.

As the table below shows, only a small gap now separates the top models:

Model Mensa Norway IQ (April 2026)
Grok-4.20 Expert Mode 145
OpenAI GPT 5.4 Pro (Vision) 145
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 141
OpenAI GPT 5.4 Thinking (Vision) 139
OpenAI GPT 5.3 136
Grok-4.20 Expert Mode (Vision) 133
OpenAI GPT 5.4 Thinking 133
Meta Muse Spark 133
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (Vision) 132
Qwen 3.5 130
Claude-4.6 Opus 130
Kimi K2.5 127
Manus 115
DeepSeek R1 112
DeepSeek V3 111
Gemini 3.1 Flash Preview 110
Llama 4 Maverick 110
OpenAI GPT 5.3 (Vision) 109
Claude-4.6 Sonnet 106
Bing Copilot 101
Perplexity 97
Mistral Medium 3.1 96
Claude-4.6 Sonnet (Vision) 94
Claude-4.6 Opus (Vision) 82
Llama 4 Maverick (Vision) 79
OpenAI GPT 5.4 Pro 73

The biggest takeaway is how compressed the top of the leaderboard has become. Grok-4.20 Expert Mode and OpenAI GPT 5.4 Pro (Vision) are tied for first at 145, while Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview follows closely at 141.

That narrow spread suggests frontier AI models are increasingly converging at the top, where a difference of just a few points can shift the rankings.

The gains from 2025 are also notable. Last year’s top score was 135, compared with 145 in this year’s results, highlighting the speed at which leading models are improving on this benchmark.

Not all models are keeping pace. Among major AI developers, Mistral’s top model ranks lowest in this dataset, scoring 97—well below the leading group.

How TrackingAI Runs the Test

TrackingAI uses the public Mensa Norway test, a set of 35 visual-pattern puzzles. For non-vision models, the questions are verbalized, while vision models receive the original images directly.

As a result, these results are best understood as a benchmark comparison—not a definitive measure of overall intelligence. Because the test is fundamentally visual, model scores can vary depending on how the questions are presented.

Why This Benchmark Matters

TrackingAI’s leaderboard is useful because it offers a simple, familiar way to compare reasoning performance over time. The site also notes that if a model refuses to answer, it is asked the same question up to 10 times, and the most recent answer is used for scoring.

Still, an IQ-style benchmark captures only one slice of capability. It does not measure everything that matters in real-world AI use, such as coding ability, factual reliability, tool use, or performance in professional domains.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Global AI Adoption on Voronoi.

 

Mapped: Gas Prices Worldwide, From $0.09 to $15.65

2026-04-24 19:11:08

See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app.

Map showing gasoline prices around the world

Use This Visualization

Mapped: Gas Prices Worldwide, From $0.09 to $15.65

See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Key Takeaways

  • Gas prices range from $0.09 per gallon in Libya to $15.65 in Hong Kong.
  • A $10 fill-up can take you 3,885 miles or just 22 miles, depending on where you are.
  • Oil-rich nations keep prices low through subsidies, while taxes drive higher costs in wealthier economies.

Gas prices vary dramatically across the globe, with some drivers paying over 170x more per gallon than others.

This map shows gasoline prices in 170 countries as of April 2026, based on data from GlobalPetrolPrices. The global average sits at $5.58 per gallon, in the middle of a massive range from $0.09 in Libya to $15.65 in Hong Kong.

In oil-rich countries like Libya and Iran, fuel is heavily subsidized, making it cheaper than bottled water in some cases. Meanwhile, dense, import-dependent regions like Hong Kong face the highest prices in the world.

The Cheapest Gasoline Is in Oil-Rich Nations

Libya tops the list at just $0.09 per gallon, followed by Iran and Venezuela, all below $0.15.

In these countries, governments often subsidize fuel to maintain political stability and support domestic consumption. In Libya, gasoline is even cheaper than bottled water.

Rank Country Price (USD/gal)
1 🇱🇾 Libya $0.09
2 🇮🇷 Iran $0.11
3 🇻🇪 Venezuela $0.13
4 🇦🇴 Angola $1.24
5 🇰🇼 Kuwait $1.28
6 🇩🇿 Algeria $1.34
7 🇹🇲 Turkmenistan $1.62
8 🇪🇬 Egypt $1.66
9 🇰🇿 Kazakhstan $1.99
10 🇶🇦 Qatar $2.13
11 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia $2.35
12 🇴🇲 Oman $2.35
13 🇮🇶 Iraq $2.46
14 🇧🇭 Bahrain $2.54
15 🇦🇿 Azerbaijan $2.56
16 🇸🇩 Sudan $2.65
17 🇮🇩 Indonesia $2.75
18 🇪🇨 Ecuador $2.89
19 🇹🇳 Tunisia $3.25
20 🇷🇺 Russia $3.26
21 🇳🇪 Niger $3.32
22 🇳🇬 Nigeria $3.36
23 🇦🇪 UAE $3.38
24 🇪🇹 Ethiopia $3.41
25 🇧🇾 Belarus $3.44
26 🇧🇹 Bhutan $3.47
27 🇰🇬 Kyrgyzstan $3.51
28 🇬🇾 Guyana $3.52
29 🇦🇫 Afghanistan $3.61
30 🇸🇾 Syria $3.62
31 🇲🇾 Malaysia $3.63
32 🇧🇩 Bangladesh $3.68
33 🇧🇴 Bolivia $3.82
34 🇺🇿 Uzbekistan $3.83
35 🇲🇻 Maldives $3.92
36 🇻🇳 Vietnam $3.94
37 🇬🇦 Gabon $3.97
38 🇨🇩 DR Congo $3.98
39 🇹🇼 Taiwan $4.02
40 🇮🇳 India $4.12
41 🇨🇴 Colombia $4.21
42 🇯🇵 Japan $4.22
43 🇵🇾 Paraguay $4.23
44 🇸🇻 El Salvador $4.30
45 🇹🇹 Trinidad & Tobago $4.32
46 🇸🇿 Swaziland $4.36
47 🇺🇸 United States $4.45
48 🇲🇬 Madagascar $4.45
49 🇹🇬 Togo $4.53
50 🇱🇧 Lebanon $4.57
51 🇨🇼 Curacao $4.58
52 🇧🇯 Benin $4.63
53 🇵🇷 Puerto Rico $4.66
54 🇬🇩 Grenada $4.68
55 🇲🇺 Mauritius $4.71
56 🇵🇦 Panama $4.75
57 🇸🇷 Suriname $4.89
58 🇨🇺 Cuba $4.90
59 🇱🇨 Saint Lucia $4.93
60 🇬🇭 Ghana $4.93
61 🇳🇦 Namibia $4.95
62 🇲🇿 Mozambique $4.95
63 🇭🇳 Honduras $4.95
64 🇧🇷 Brazil $4.97
65 🇫🇯 Fiji $4.98
66 🇧🇼 Botswana $5.01
67 🇩🇴 Dominican Republic $5.02
68 🇦🇲 Armenia $5.03
69 🇬🇪 Georgia $5.03
70 🇳🇮 Nicaragua $5.05
71 🇨🇳 China $5.08
72 🇧🇮 Burundi $5.10
73 🇵🇰 Pakistan $5.13
74 🇳🇵 Nepal $5.14
75 🇯🇲 Jamaica $5.15
76 🇰🇪 Kenya $5.16
77 🇿🇦 South Africa $5.16
78 🇱🇷 Liberia $5.16
79 🇨🇷 Costa Rica $5.17
80 🇬🇳 Guinea $5.18
81 🇦🇼 Aruba $5.21
82 🇱🇸 Lesotho $5.22
83 🇸🇨 Seychelles $5.30
84 🇿🇲 Zambia $5.30
85 🇹🇷 Turkey $5.31
86 🇺🇬 Uganda $5.33
87 🇲🇳 Mongolia $5.41
88 🇬🇹 Guatemala $5.44
89 🇰🇷 South Korea $5.45
90 🇱🇰 Sri Lanka $5.46
91 🇨🇮 Ivory Coast $5.46
92 🇭🇹 Haiti $5.53
93 🇨🇻 Cape Verde $5.54
94 🇧🇸 Bahamas $5.54
95 🇹🇿 Tanzania $5.56
96 🇦🇺 Australia $5.57
97 🇨🇲 Cameroon $5.60
98 🇧🇫 Burkina Faso $5.66
99 🇨🇦 Canada $5.67
100 🇲🇲 Myanmar $5.75
101 🇦🇷 Argentina $5.76
102 🇰🇾 Cayman Islands $5.79
103 🇩🇲 Dominica $5.80
104 🇲🇱 Mali $5.83
105 🇲🇹 Malta $5.88
106 🇲🇰 North Macedonia $5.95
107 🇵🇭 Philippines $5.96
108 🇷🇼 Rwanda $5.97
109 🇲🇽 Mexico $5.99
110 🇸🇳 Senegal $6.13
111 🇵🇪 Peru $6.16
112 🇲🇦 Morocco $6.22
113 🇹🇭 Thailand $6.24
114 🇨🇱 Chile $6.24
115 🇰🇭 Cambodia $6.28
116 🇧🇦 Bosnia & Herzegovina $6.35
117 🇧🇬 Bulgaria $6.39
118 🇯🇴 Jordan $6.41
119 🇲🇩 Moldova $6.48
120 🇺🇦 Ukraine $6.55
121 🇨🇾 Cyprus $6.64
122 🇸🇱 Sierra Leone $6.73
123 🇸🇲 San Marino $6.81
124 🇭🇺 Hungary $6.86
125 🇪🇸 Spain $6.88
126 🇸🇰 Slovakia $6.92
127 🇦🇩 Andorra $6.96
128 🇲🇪 Montenegro $6.98
129 🇨🇫 Central African Republic $7.00
130 🇧🇧 Barbados $7.01
131 🇼🇫 Wallis & Futuna $7.02
132 🇮🇸 Iceland $7.02
133 🇷🇸 Serbia $7.07
134 🇸🇮 Slovenia $7.10
135 🇱🇦 Laos $7.17
136 🇧🇿 Belize $7.27
137 🇭🇷 Croatia $7.38
138 🇵🇱 Poland $7.41
139 🇨🇿 Czech Republic $7.42
140 🇬🇧 UK $7.49
141 🇪🇪 Estonia $7.57
142 🇳🇿 New Zealand $7.61
143 🇱🇹 Lithuania $7.64
144 🇺🇾 Uruguay $7.67
145 🇱🇺 Luxembourg $7.72
146 🇸🇪 Sweden $7.79
147 🇦🇹 Austria $7.85
148 🇮🇹 Italy $7.85
149 🇷🇴 Romania $7.91
150 🇱🇻 Latvia $8.07
151 🇧🇪 Belgium $8.23
152 🇳🇴 Norway $8.26
153 🇿🇼 Zimbabwe $8.44
154 🇵🇹 Portugal $8.51
155 🇮🇪 Ireland $8.60
156 🇾🇹 Mayotte $8.65
157 🇫🇷 France $8.75
158 🇨🇭 Switzerland $8.89
159 🇫🇮 Finland $8.94
160 🇦🇱 Albania $9.10
161 🇬🇷 Greece $9.10
162 🇸🇬 Singapore $9.11
163 🇱🇮 Liechtenstein $9.40
164 🇩🇪 Germany $9.57
165 🇲🇨 Monaco $9.73
166 🇮🇱 Israel $10.00
167 🇩🇰 Denmark $10.20
168 🇳🇱 Netherlands $10.26
169 🇲🇼 Malawi $14.56
170 🇭🇰 Hong Kong $15.65
-- 🌐 World Average $5.58

In the United States, gasoline prices sit close to the global average at about $4.45 per gallon in 2026. This relatively moderate pricing reflects a balance between domestic oil production and comparatively low fuel taxes versus Europe. While the U.S. is one of the world’s largest oil producers, prices still fluctuate with global crude markets and refining capacity.

High Taxes Drive Prices in Wealthy Economies

In contrast, the most expensive gasoline is found in high-income, import-dependent regions. Hong Kong leads globally at $15.65 per gallon, followed by European countries like the Netherlands and Denmark, as well as countries such as Malawi and Israel.

How Far Can $10 Take You?

One of the clearest ways to understand global price gaps is purchasing power at the pump—how far the same amount of money takes you.

In Libya, $10 can buy enough gasoline to travel roughly 3,885 miles. In Hong Kong, that same amount covers just 22 miles.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Gasoline Price Changes Since the Start of the Iran War on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.

Charted: The Global Trade in European Antiques

2026-04-24 12:51:43

Charted: The Global Trade in European Antiques

Key Takeaways

  • France supplies 58% of EU antique exports, dominating the market.
  • The U.S. is the top buyer, importing 44% of Europe’s antiques.
  • Just five countries account for nearly 90% of EU exports, highlighting how concentrated the trade is.

The global trade in European antiques is dominated by a few key players on both sides of the market.

France leads exports by a wide margin, while the United States is the largest destination for these goods.

Based on UN Comtrade data and visualized by The European Correspondent, this flow chart shows how antiques, defined here as objects over 100 years old, move from European sellers to buyers around the world.

France Dominates Europe’s Antique Exports

Here are the top exporters of European antiquities by value:

Top Exporters Trade Value (USD) Market Share (%)
🇫🇷 France $139M 58%
🇩🇪 Germany $28M 12%
🇳🇱 Netherlands $15M 6%
🇦🇹 Austria $14M 6%
🇧🇪 Belgium $14M 6%
🇪🇺 Others EU $30M 12%

France is the clear leader in Europe’s antique export market, accounting for 58% of total exports at $139 million, more than all other countries combined.

This dominance reflects several structural advantages. Paris remains one of the world’s top auction hubs, with a dense network of galleries, dealers, and auction houses that facilitate global sales. France also holds a vast inventory of cultural assets, from fine art and furniture to rare collectibles built over centuries of artistic and political influence.

Other European countries like Germany, the Netherlands, and Austria participate in the market, but at a much smaller scale. Their comparatively limited export values highlight how concentrated the supply side is, with France acting as the primary gateway for European heritage entering global markets.

Who’s Buying Europe’s Past?

Here are the top importers of European antiquities:

Top Importers Trade Value (USD) Market Share (%)
🇺🇸 United States $105M 44%
🇬🇧 UK $48M 20%
🇪🇺 Intra-EU $26M 11%
🇨🇳 China / 🇭🇰 Hong Kong $25M 10%
🇨🇭 Switzerland $15M 6%
🌍 Other $21M 9%

The United States leads by a wide margin, importing $105 million worth of antiques, or 44% of the total. The UK ranks second, followed by intra-EU trade and Asian markets like China and Hong Kong.

This aligns with broader trends in the global art market. American collectors and institutions remain key drivers of demand for cultural assets.

Meanwhile, policy changes, such as evolving tariffs on antiques and auction items, could influence future flows. While many antiques have historically benefited from favorable trade treatment, shifts in regulation may affect both buyers and sellers in the coming years.

Ranked: AI Models U.S. Businesses Pay For

2026-04-24 00:48:35

Ranked: AI Models U.S. Businesses Pay For

See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Key Takeaways

  • OpenAI leads paid AI adoption among U.S. businesses at 35%, but Anthropic has surged to 30% in just over a year.
  • Anthropic’s growth has been driven by enterprise tools like Claude Code and Cowork.
  • Google, xAI, and others remain far behind, each used by less than 5% of businesses.

Anthropic is rapidly closing the gap with OpenAI in the race for paid AI adoption among U.S. businesses.

As of March 2026, 35% of companies pay for OpenAI’s models, compared to 30% for Anthropic—a sharp shift from early 2025, when the gap was nearly three times wider. The change highlights how quickly enterprise demand is consolidating around a small number of AI providers.

This chart, a part of Visual Capitalist’s AI Week sponsored by Terzo, uses anonymized spend data from over 50,000 U.S. businesses on the Ramp platform, capturing only paid subscriptions and excluding free-tier usage.

OpenAI Leads, But Anthropic Is Closing In Fast

OpenAI remains the most widely paid-for AI provider among U.S. businesses, reaching 35.2% of companies in March 2026. Anthropic sits just behind at 30.6%—a gap of only 4.5 percentage points.

The data table below shows the share of U.S. businesses paying for AI models from different providers from January 2023 to March of 2026:

Share of U.S. Businesses Paying for an AI Subscription
Date OpenAI Anthropic Google xAI
1/1/2023 0.4% 0.0% 1.7% 0.0%
2/1/2023 1.5% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0%
3/1/2023 3.6% 0.0% 1.7% 0.0%
4/1/2023 5.7% 0.0% 1.8% 0.0%
5/1/2023 6.1% 0.0% 1.8% 0.0%
6/1/2023 5.9% 0.0% 1.9% 0.0%
7/1/2023 6.8% 0.1% 1.7% 0.0%
8/1/2023 7.2% 0.1% 1.7% 0.0%
9/1/2023 7.8% 0.2% 1.8% 0.0%
10/1/2023 8.1% 0.3% 1.8% 0.0%
11/1/2023 8.2% 0.2% 2.4% 0.0%
12/1/2023 9.3% 0.3% 2.4% 0.0%
1/1/2024 10.2% 0.4% 2.5% 0.0%
2/1/2024 10.2% 0.4% 2.6% 0.0%
3/1/2024 11.0% 1.2% 3.0% 0.0%
4/1/2024 10.6% 1.4% 3.3% 0.0%
5/1/2024 11.3% 1.4% 3.4% 0.0%
6/1/2024 11.0% 1.5% 3.2% 0.0%
7/1/2024 11.8% 2.3% 3.4% 0.0%
8/1/2024 12.5% 2.5% 3.5% 0.0%
9/1/2024 12.7% 2.7% 3.6% 0.0%
10/1/2024 13.7% 3.0% 3.7% 0.0%
11/1/2024 13.4% 3.2% 3.9% 0.0%
12/1/2024 14.8% 3.6% 4.0% 0.0%
1/1/2025 16.8% 4.1% 4.2% 0.0%
2/1/2025 18.2% 4.4% 4.2% 0.2%
3/1/2025 26.4% 7.0% 2.5% 0.4%
4/1/2025 32.0% 7.9% 3.2% 0.5%
5/1/2025 33.6% 8.9% 4.3% 0.5%
6/1/2025 33.4% 9.6% 4.0% 0.6%
7/1/2025 35.0% 11.1% 3.4% 1.5%
8/1/2025 36.5% 12.1% 3.0% 1.5%
9/1/2025 35.5% 12.2% 3.3% 1.3%
10/1/2025 35.8% 14.3% 3.3% 1.6%
11/1/2025 34.8% 15.1% 4.0% 1.8%
12/1/2025 36.8% 16.7% 4.3% 1.9%
1/1/2026 35.9% 19.5% 4.5% 2.0%
2/1/2026 34.4% 24.4% 4.7% 1.9%
3/1/2026 35.2% 30.6% 4.3% 1.9%

That gap looked very different a year ago. In January 2025, OpenAI was used by 16.8% of U.S. businesses while Anthropic sat at 4.1%, a spread of nearly 13 points. Anthropic has since grown more than sevenfold in 14 months, while OpenAI roughly doubled over the same period.

The remaining providers remain distant in paid business adoption. Google’s AI products—spanning Gemini, Vertex AI, and Workspace add-ons—have hovered between 3% and 4.5% of U.S. businesses for most of the past three years, barely moving despite heavy investment.

xAI has climbed from effectively zero in early 2024 to 1.9% in March 2026, a meaningful but still small footprint.

Claude Code and Cowork Drove the Anthropic Surge

Anthropic’s rapid rise in business adoption tracks its push into enterprise developer and knowledge-work tools.

Claude Code, the company’s coding assistant, and Cowork, its workflow collaboration platform, were both scaled aggressively across late 2025 and 2026—the period that coincides with the steepest part of Anthropic’s curve.

The pattern suggests that enterprise-native tooling, rather than general chatbot access, is now the key driver of paid seat growth. OpenAI has responded with its own developer coding tool, Codex, but Anthropic’s focus on developer workflows has clearly found traction in corporate procurement.

While Codex launched months after Claude Code, it has rapidly gained adoption among developers and knowledge workers, reaching four million active users as of April 21, 2026.