2026-04-01 23:52:22

This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
A small group of companies dominates the global arms industry, with a clear leader at the top.
This chart, created by Iswardi Ishak using data from SIPRI, ranks the top 20 defense companies by arms sales in 2024. Lockheed Martin stands well ahead of its peers, highlighting the industry’s concentration among a handful of major contractors.
U.S. firms play an outsized role at the top of the ranking, while China and Europe continue to expand their presence, pointing to a gradually shifting global landscape.
U.S. companies account for six of the top 10 firms by arms revenue, reflecting their scale in high-cost, long-cycle defense programs. From fighter jets to missile defense systems, these projects create steady, long-term revenue streams.
| Rank | Company | Arms Revenue ($B) | Arms Revenue as % of Total Revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Lockheed Martin Corp. |
64.65 | 91.0 |
| 2 |
RTX Corporation |
43.60 | 54.0 |
| 3 |
Northrop Grumman |
37.85 | 92.2 |
| 4 |
BAE Systems |
33.79 | 95.4 |
| 5 |
General Dynamics |
33.63 | 70.4 |
| 6 |
Boeing |
30.55 | 45.9 |
| 7 |
Rostec |
27.12 | 69.7 |
| 8 |
Aviation Industry Corp. |
20.32 | 25.0 |
| 9 |
China Electronics Technology Group |
18.92 | 34.3 |
| 10 |
L3Harris Technologies |
16.21 | 76.0 |
| 11 |
NORINCO |
13.97 | 22.7 |
| 12 |
Leonardo |
13.83 | 72.0 |
| 13 |
Airbus |
13.37 | 17.9 |
| 14 |
China State Shipbuilding Corp. |
12.33 | 24.8 |
| 15 |
Thales |
11.80 | 53.0 |
| 16 |
Huntington Ingalls Industries |
10.28 | 89.1 |
| 17 |
China Aerospace Science and Technology Corp. |
10.23 | 30.0 |
| 18 |
Leidos |
9.37 | 56.2 |
| 19 |
Amentum |
8.33 | 60.1 |
| 20 |
Rheinmetall |
8.24 | 78.1 |
Together, these companies generate hundreds of billions in arms sales, but revenue is concentrated among the top players.
Lockheed Martin leads with nearly $65 billion in arms revenue, well ahead of RTX and Northrop Grumman.
General Dynamics, Boeing, and L3Harris Technologies also rank in the top 10, giving U.S. firms six of the top spots.
European firms remain major players, though their revenues trail the largest U.S. contractors. BAE Systems ranks fourth overall, while Leonardo, Airbus, Thales, and Rheinmetall also appear in the top 20.
Chinese state-owned enterprises feature prominently, including AVIC, CETC, NORINCO, China State Shipbuilding Corporation, and China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation. Together, they reflect China’s expanding defense industrial base across aerospace, electronics, and shipbuilding.
Where do the world’s nuclear warheads reside? Check out this visualization to learn more.
2026-04-01 21:47:28
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Property taxes are one of the biggest ongoing costs of owning a home, and in some states they can add thousands of dollars a year to the price of staying put.
The U.S. national median annual property tax bill sits at $2,937, and the gap between the highest- and lowest-bill states stretches into the thousands of dollars.
This map shows the median annual property tax bill for owner-occupied homes by state using data from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 2024 1-Year Estimates, the latest available data as of March 2026.
New Jersey ranks first by a wide margin, with a median annual property tax bill of $9,358. It is followed by New Hampshire at $6,707, Connecticut at $6,573, New York at $6,542, and Massachusetts at $6,080.
Overall, seven of the top 10 states are in the Northeast, underscoring how heavily many local governments in the region rely on property taxes to fund schools and municipal services.
The table below ranks all 50 states by median annual property tax bill, from highest to lowest.
| Rank | State | Median Annual Property Tax Bill |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Jersey | $9,358 |
| 2 | New Hampshire | $6,707 |
| 3 | Connecticut | $6,573 |
| 4 | New York | $6,542 |
| 5 | Massachusetts | $6,080 |
| 6 | Illinois | $5,399 |
| 7 | California | $5,369 |
| 8 | Vermont | $5,026 |
| 9 | Rhode Island | $4,886 |
| 10 | Washington | $4,729 |
| 11 | District of Columbia | $4,594 |
| 12 | Maryland | $4,144 |
| 13 | Texas | $4,108 |
| 14 | Alaska | $3,976 |
| 15 | Oregon | $3,895 |
| 16 | Nebraska | $3,739 |
| 17 | Wisconsin | $3,680 |
| 18 | Minnesota | $3,501 |
| 19 | Pennsylvania | $3,214 |
| 20 | Maine | $3,103 |
| 21 | Florida | $2,993 |
| 22 | Michigan | $2,988 |
| 23 | Kansas | $2,983 |
| 24 | South Dakota | $2,940 |
| 25 | Montana | $2,939 |
| 26 | Iowa | $2,937 |
| 27 | Ohio | $2,937 |
| 28 | Virginia | $2,872 |
| 29 | Colorado | $2,828 |
| 30 | Utah | $2,648 |
| 31 | Georgia | $2,554 |
| 32 | North Dakota | $2,550 |
| 33 | Hawaii | $2,385 |
| 34 | Nevada | $2,143 |
| 35 | North Carolina | $2,044 |
| 36 | Missouri | $2,021 |
| 37 | Wyoming | $1,947 |
| 38 | Idaho | $1,912 |
| 39 | Arizona | $1,828 |
| 40 | Indiana | $1,798 |
| 41 | New Mexico | $1,776 |
| 42 | Delaware | $1,750 |
| 43 | Oklahoma | $1,672 |
| 44 | Kentucky | $1,611 |
| 45 | Tennessee | $1,488 |
| 46 | South Carolina | $1,337 |
| 47 | Mississippi | $1,221 |
| 48 | Louisiana | $1,187 |
| 49 | Arkansas | $1,113 |
| 50 | Alabama | $890 |
| 51 | West Virginia | $881 |
At the other end of the map, West Virginia has the lowest median bill at $881, followed closely by Alabama at $890. Arkansas ($1,113), Louisiana ($1,187), and Mississippi ($1,221) also sit well below the national median of $2,937.
Outside the Northeast, California ($5,369) and Washington ($4,729) stand out for high dollar bills driven in part by elevated home values.
Property tax bills are driven by two factors: home values and how much local governments rely on property taxes.
This is why high-value states like California can generate large bills even with moderate rates, while lower-cost states tend to produce smaller annual burdens overall.
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Mapped: Average House Prices by State on Voronoi.
2026-04-01 20:04:38
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Carbon emissions are often measured at the national level, but that can mask a key reality: how much each person actually contributes.
This graphic ranks CO₂ emissions relative to population across the world’s 30 largest economies, highlighting sharp differences between countries with similar levels of wealth.
From oil-rich nations to industrial powerhouses, the latest figures from Our World in Data shows that where you live can dramatically shape your personal carbon footprint, with some countries emitting nearly 10x more per person than others.
The table below shows the CO₂ emissions per capita of the world’s top 30 economies by GDP, measured in tonnes per person in 2024:
| Rank | Country | CO₂ Emissions per Capita 2024 (tonnes per person) |
Region |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Saudi Arabia |
20.4 | Middle East |
| 2 |
UAE |
20.1 | Middle East |
| 3 |
Australia |
14.5 | Oceania |
| 4 |
U.S. |
14.2 | North America |
| 5 |
Canada |
13.4 | North America |
| 6 |
Russia |
12.3 | Europe |
| 7 |
South Korea |
11.3 | Asia |
| 8 |
Singapore |
9.2 | Asia |
| 9 |
China |
8.7 | Asia |
| 10 |
Japan |
7.8 | Asia |
| 11 |
Belgium |
7.3 | Europe |
| 12 |
Poland |
7.1 | Europe |
| 13 |
Germany |
6.8 | Europe |
| 14 |
Ireland |
6.3 | Europe |
| 15 |
Netherlands |
6.3 | Europe |
| 16 |
Austria |
6.2 | Europe |
| 17 |
Türkiye |
5.9 | Asia |
| 18 |
Israel |
5.6 | Middle East |
| 19 |
Italy |
5.1 | Europe |
| 20 |
Spain |
4.6 | Europe |
| 21 |
UK |
4.5 | Europe |
| 22 |
France |
4.0 | Europe |
| 23 |
Argentina |
3.7 | South America |
| 24 |
Thailand |
3.7 | Asia |
| 25 |
Switzerland |
3.6 | Europe |
| 26 |
Sweden |
3.6 | Europe |
| 27 |
Mexico |
3.5 | North America |
| 28 |
Indonesia |
2.9 | Asia |
| 29 |
Brazil |
2.3 | South America |
| 30 |
India |
2.2 | Asia |
Saudi Arabia and the UAE each exceed 20 tonnes of CO₂ per person, driven by energy-intensive industries, fossil fuel dependence, and relatively small populations.
At the same time, they rank among the highest per capita emitters globally. Following next in line are Australia, the U.S. and Canada, which emit around three times the global average emissions per capita. This reflects their resource-heavy industries and high energy consumption.
Similarly, Russia’s extensive energy production makes it the largest emitter among major economies in Europe, with 12.3 tonnes of CO₂ emissions per person.
Across Asia’s largest economies, per person emissions cover a wide spectrum.
South Korea leads the region at 11.3 tonnes of CO₂ per capita, driven by energy and manufacturing industries. Singapore follows, at 9.2 tonnes of CO₂ emissions per capita, home to one of the world’s largest oil refining and trading hubs.
China, meanwhile, emits 8.7 tonnes per person, or nearly double the global average. While it remains the world’s largest emitter overall, it has also become a global leader in clean energy, from solar to electric vehicles, and is investing heavily in scaling green hydrogen.
At the other end of the spectrum is India, with 2.2 tonnes per capita. Despite continued reliance on coal, the country has set—and surpassed—ambitious solar targets, and is on track to triple its renewable energy capacity by 2030 compared to 2022 levels.
To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on the world’s carbon emissions by sector.
2026-04-01 02:48:00
Reliable electricity is gaining value as utilities plan for AI-led growth and a more digital economy.
Capacity factor helps compare the fitness of power sources on this topic because it shows which technologies deliver the steadiest output over time.
This graphic, in partnership with the National Public Utilities Council, shows the most consistent U.S. power sources using data from the EIA.
Capacity factor compares actual generation with the maximum possible output over a full year. As a result, it offers a simple way to see which power sources can run hardest when demand rises.
Here is a table that shows U.S. power sources ranked by 2025 capacity factor.
| Energy Source | Capacity Factor (2025) |
|---|---|
| Nuclear | 91% |
| Geothermal | 66% |
| Biomass | 59% |
| Natural Gas (Combined Cycle) | 58% |
| Wood | 57% |
| Coal | 49% |
| Hydroelectric | 35% |
| Wind | 34% |
| Solar (Photovoltaic) | 24% |
| Petroleum (Steam Turbine) | 11% |
Among the major energy sources powering the U.S. today, one standout winner is nuclear.
Nuclear posts a 91% capacity factor, far ahead of geothermal at 66% and biomass at 59%. That lead helps explain why firm, emission-free generation remains central as U.S. data center power demand climbs.
The combined cycle variant of natural gas, with its capacity factor of 58%, is the current go-to source in the U.S. for meeting the jump in electricity demand from AI and data centers because utilities can add firm gas-fired generation faster than many other always-available options.
Meanwhile, a low capacity factor is one of the biggest downsides of wind (34%) and solar (24%), as it limits how often they can produce at high levels compared with more consistent sources. Utilities must often pair them with storage, backup generation, or grid upgrades to maintain reliability as demand grows.
Several U.S. investor-owned utilities are prioritizing expanding energy capacity for the source with the highest capacity factor.
For example, Duke Energy filed an early site permit application on December 30, 2025, for a potential nuclear site at Belews Creek in North Carolina.
Meanwhile, Georgia Power’s approved 2025 IRP is designed to meet the needs of a growing Georgia, showing how major investor-owned utilities are planning for higher loads with firm generation, grid upgrades, and long-range strategy.
Together, those moves show why capacity factor matters beyond a ranking. It helps utilities identify which power sources can support growth, strengthen resilience, and keep decarbonization plans moving.

Which U.S. states are winning the data center race? This visualization shows the states gaining and losing data center market share in the next two years.

Which states dominate carbon offsets? This U.S. map shows the hotspots as utilities respond to the AI electricity surge.

Just four U.S. utilities operate with over 80% carbon-free generation. This graphic ranks the top 10 cleanest utilities by their fuel mix.

This streamgraph shows projected offshore wind capacity by region, according to The Global Wind Energy Council.

Severe weather caused all ten of the largest U.S. power outages in the past decade, highlighting the importance of grid resiliency.

This treemap chart uses data from Statistical Review of World Energy to show the top 10 countries with the most battery storage capacity in 2023.

This voronoi depicts the countries that capture the most carbon globally in 2023, with data from Rystad Energy.

This bar chart shows the countries’ highest and lowest energy transition index scores determined by the World Economic Forum.

This dumbbell plot shows the most and least expensive sources of energy in the U.S., using data from Lazard.

This infographic shows the greenhouse gas emissions targets of all countries and their target years with data from Net Zero Tracker.

This bar chart shows the varying prices of carbon across different economies around the globe, using data from the World Bank.

This streamgraph shows the growth in renewable energy capacity by country and region since 2000.

From tropical cyclones to severe storms, the number of extreme weather disasters with losses exceeding $1 billion has climbed over time.

What are the most polluted cities in the U.S. according to data from the American Lung Association’s 2024 State of the Air Report?

The U.S. emits about 6 billion metric tons of greenhouse gases a year. Here’s how these emissions rank by sector.

Can America become carbon-free by 2035? This graphic breaks down the United States’ electricity mix, by state.

This infographic highlights announced coal plant closures in the U.S. and how much power will be affected.
2026-04-01 01:24:09
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
America’s data center buildout is increasingly concentrated in a handful of states as AI demand drives a new wave of digital infrastructure investment. Texas and Virginia alone account for far more projects under construction than most of the country combined.
This map shows the number of data centers currently under construction in each U.S. state as of March 2026, based on data from Aterio.
Texas leads data construction by a narrow margin, but the bigger story is how sharply development clusters around states with access to land, power, connectivity, and favorable permitting.
| Rank | State | Data Centers Under Construction |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Texas | 140 |
| 2 | Virginia | 136 |
| 3 | Georgia | 56 |
| 4 | Ohio | 51 |
| 5 | Arizona | 35 |
| 6 | Nevada | 29 |
| 7 | Indiana | 23 |
| 8 | Mississippi | 21 |
| 9 | Illinois | 19 |
| 10 | Iowa | 15 |
| 11 | Oregon | 14 |
| 12 | North Carolina | 12 |
| 12 | South Carolina | 12 |
| 12 | Wisconsin | 12 |
| 12 | Maryland | 12 |
| 16 | Pennsylvania | 11 |
| 16 | Louisiana | 11 |
| 18 | Utah | 10 |
| 19 | Oklahoma | 9 |
| 20 | Missouri | 8 |
| 20 | Alabama | 8 |
| 20 | Wyoming | 8 |
| 23 | California | 6 |
| 23 | Colorado | 6 |
| 25 | Nebraska | 5 |
| 25 | New Mexico | 5 |
| 27 | Minnesota | 4 |
| 27 | North Dakota | 4 |
| 29 | Washington | 3 |
| 29 | New York | 3 |
| 29 | Tennessee | 3 |
| 32 | Florida | 2 |
| 32 | New Jersey | 2 |
| 32 | Kentucky | 2 |
| 32 | Arkansas | 2 |
| 32 | Idaho | 2 |
| 37 | Michigan | 1 |
| 37 | Kansas | 1 |
| 39 | Massachusetts | 0 |
| 39 | Connecticut | 0 |
| 39 | Delaware | 0 |
| 39 | New Hampshire | 0 |
| 39 | District Of Columbia | 0 |
| 39 | West Virginia | 0 |
| 39 | Montana | 0 |
| 39 | Maine | 0 |
| 39 | Rhode Island | 0 |
| 39 | South Dakota | 0 |
| 39 | Hawaii | 0 |
| 39 | Vermont | 0 |
U.S. data center capacity is set to expand rapidly as artificial intelligence drives a new wave of infrastructure demand. Meeting that demand will require enormous investment in power, land, and construction, and the buildout is already well underway. Big Tech is expected to spend $700 billion on AI data centers this year alone, helping accelerate projects across a small number of key states.
Texas leads the nation with 140 data centers under construction, narrowly ahead of Virginia with 136. They are the only two states with more than 100 projects underway as of March 2026, putting them well ahead of the rest of the country.
After those two, there is a sharp drop to Georgia at 56 and Ohio at 51. That gap highlights just how concentrated the current buildout is, with most states seeing only modest activity. In fact, 12 states have no data centers under construction at all, while another 11 have fewer than five.
Virginia’s strength is centered in Northern Virginia’s “Data Center Alley,” one of the world’s most important internet hubs. The region’s dense fiber connectivity, established cloud presence, and proximity to major population and enterprise centers have helped attract operators including Amazon Web Services, Google, and Microsoft.
A huge portion of global internet traffic passes through the region, which is only set to grow as more data centers are established.
The same factors attracting data center developers, especially access to power and land, are also creating new bottlenecks.
In fast-growing markets, the surge in electricity demand is beginning to test grid capacity and raise questions about how quickly utilities can keep pace. In Texas, developers have created levels of demand that could be impossible to meet.
The boom has also sparked resistance in some communities near proposed sites. In rural Georgia, for instance, residents cite widespread concerns about sound, light, and environmental pollution. In addition, one resident says a data center has caused her private well to run dry; data centers are water-intensive operations because they use water for cooling.
As a result, policymakers in some states and municipalities are considering tighter rules on future development, ranging from stricter environmental reviews to temporary pauses on new projects.
To learn more about the data center buildout, check out this graphic showing which states are winning and losing the most market share.
2026-03-31 23:36:00
As the global economy adjusts elevated levels of geopolitical uncertainty, growth is becoming increasingly uneven. This divergence is reshaping where economic power and opportunity will emerge in the years ahead.
This graphic, created in partnership with the Hinrich Foundation, provides visual context to the economies driving global growth in 2025 and 2026.
Data comes from the IMF’s World Economic Outlook. It’s part of a deep dive report, India’s Reckoning: How geopolitics and trade are testing India’s development strategy and the global balance of power.
The global economy is entering a phase of uneven expansion. Emerging markets are firmly in the driver’s seat, according to IMF projections.
India stands out as the fastest growing major economy, projected to expand at more than triple the pace of most developed nations (6.2% in 2026).
| Country | Real GDP Growth 2025 (%) | Real GDP Growth 2026 (%) |
|---|---|---|
India |
6.6 | 6.2 |
Indonesia |
4.9 | 4.9 |
China |
4.8 | 4.2 |
Brazil |
2.4 | 1.9 |
U.S. |
2.0 | 2.1 |
UK |
1.3 | 1.3 |
Japan |
1.1 | 0.6 |
France |
0.7 | 0.9 |
Russia |
0.6 | 1.0 |
Germany |
0.2 | 0.9 |
Close behind, Indonesia and China are expected to maintain strong momentum, with expansion rates above 4% for 2025 and 2026.
In contrast, advanced economies are facing slower, more constrained growth. The U.S. is forecast to grow modestly at around 2%, while countries like Japan, France, and Germany are expected to hover below 1% for 2026.
This divergence reflects structural differences, from demographics and productivity to investment cycles, and signals a broader shift in where future economic expansion will occur.
For investors and policymakers, this growing gap underscores the importance of looking beyond traditional markets for opportunities.
India’s rise is reshaping the global economic landscape. But as growth accelerates, the country faces a reckoning: translating economic scale into shared prosperity while navigating intensifying geopolitical competition.

The Ecological Footprint reveals how consumption strains the planet. Which countries leave the biggest mark?

Levels of economic development differ not only from one country to another, but also dramatically within their own borders. Which countries lead versus lag?

Based on data from the World Trade Organization, which countries have the highest and lowest number of trade agreements?

Based on the Hinrich Foundation’s 2025 Sustainable Trade Index, which economies are the most and least sustainable?

Trump’s tariffs affect all major U.S. trading partners, but what matters is how each country’s tariffs compare to its competitors.

U.S. tariffs have climbed to an average rate of 18.6%—the highest since 1933. But what does this mean for everyday consumers?

The UN has crunched the numbers projecting the ripple effects of Trump’s May 12th tariffs. Which economies are bracing for the biggest hits?

America’s goods trade deficits have dominated headlines, but a critical part of the equation is being ignored: services trade.

More data will be created, captured, and replicated in the next three years than in the rest of human history. But by how much?

Visual Capitalist has partnered with the Hinrich Foundation to explore the landscape of global trade and find out what students and trade professionals can do to…

CO₂ emissions are reshaping the flows of international trade. Which countries have the highest and lowest CO₂ emissions per capita?

Which countries have the highest and lowest life expectancies at birth?

Based on data from the IMF’s World Economic Outlook, which countries have the highest and lowest government debt ratios?

Based on the Hinrich Foundation’s 2024 Sustainable Trade Index, which economies are the most and least sustainable?

Which countries and regions decreased, banned, or increased Russian oil imports following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine?

The de-dollarization of China’s trade settlements has begun. What patterns do we see in USD and RMB use within China and globally?

Rising geopolitical tensions are shaping the future of international trade, but what is the effect on trading among G7 and BRICS countries?

High resource dependency in trade makes countries more susceptible to market fluctuations and climate change.

This graphic adds visual context to the global education gap, using data from 29 major economies.

This graphic visualizes 30 country’s credit ratings, using data from the 2023 Sustainable Trade Index.

The Sustainable Trade Index 2023 is an annual ranking of the world’s most sustainable economies. View this infographic to see the results.

The Hinrich Foundation visualizes the impact of corporate subsidies by G20 nations between 2008 and Q1 2023.

The Hinrich Foundation explores China’s use of economic coercion and the implications of its control over the solar energy sector.

We analyze recent trade policies implemented by G20 members to determine whether they are liberalizing or harmful.

We highlight key findings from the Hinrich Foundation’s latest report on carbon markets, produced in partnership with Visual Capitalist.

Which economies have hazy air, and which ones enjoy mostly clear skies? Find out in this geographic breakdown of air pollution levels.

Prior to invading Ukraine, Russia had one of the highest levels of geopolitical risk. How does geopolitical uncertainty vary around the world?

The U.S. has by far the most harmful tariffs, with nearly 5,000 in force. Which economy has the least tariffs?

Global trade is growing across regions and countries which is creating an explosion in new jobs and education opportunities.

See which economies have the most sustainable trade policies in the Hinrich Foundation’s 2022 Sustainable Trade Index.

In this infographic, we examine the current state of digital fragmentation and it’s implications on the world.

Asia’s digital economy is expanding quicker than ever, but cooperation between governments is needed to reduce barriers.

Free trade is a powerful engine for economic growth, but rising protectionism stands in the way. See what the data says in this infographic.