MoreRSS

site iconVisual CapitalistModify

By highlighting the bigger picture through data-driven visuals, we stay true to our mission to help cut through the clutter and simplify a complex world.
Please copy the RSS to your reader, or quickly subscribe to:

Inoreader Feedly Follow Feedbin Local Reader

Rss preview of Blog of Visual Capitalist

Mapped: Thanksgiving Travel Across 100 Airports in 2025

2025-11-28 01:02:05

See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app.

U.S. map of thanksgiving air travel in 2025

Mapped: Thanksgiving Travel by Airport in 2025

See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Key Takeaways

  • Long Beach (LGB) and Oakland (OAK) show the sharpest increases in Thanksgiving week arrivals, rising 111% and 84%, respectively, year-over-year.
  • Major hubs like San Francisco International (SFO) and Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta (ATL) expect declines in Thanksgiving arrivals, highlighting 2025 travelers’ preference for smaller airports.

Thanksgiving remains one of the busiest travel periods in the United States, with millions of passengers moving through airports nationwide.

This visualization uses data from Amadeus to map out where air traffic is rising the most—and where it is falling—across 100 airports for Thanksgiving week 2025 compared to 2024.

Thanksgiving Air Travel Across the U.S. in 2025

The key trend in Thanksgiving air travel for 2025 is that smaller regional airports are experiencing surges in arrivals while major hubs are seeing notable pullbacks.

The data table below shows the year-over-year change in scheduled Thanksgiving week arrivals for 100 U.S. airports. Thanksgiving week is defined as the period from November 25th to December 2nd.

Airport code Destination airport Annual change in Thanksgiving week (2025) arrivals
LGB Long Beach Airport (Daugherty Field) 111%
OAK San Francisco Bay Oakland International Airport 84%
BUR Hollywood Burbank Airport 39%
PVD Theodore Francis Green State Airport 35%
SAC Sacramento Executive Airport 31%
SAN San Diego International Airport 31%
ELP El Paso International Airport 27%
PIT Pittsburgh International Airport 27%
MSY Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport 23%
BZN Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport 22%
PWM Portland International Jetport 22%
TUL Tulsa International Airport 22%
SJC Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport 21%
AUS Austin Bergstrom International Airport 19%
ECP Northwest Florida Beaches International Airport 19%
COS City of Colorado Springs Municipal Airport 18%
ROC Frederick Douglass Greater Rochester International Airport 18%
BOI Boise Air Terminal/Gowen Field 18%
SNA John Wayne Orange County International Airport 17%
LIH Lihue Airport 17%
RNO Reno Tahoe International Airport 16%
ICT Wichita Eisenhower National Airport 16%
ALB Albany International Airport 16%
CMH John Glenn Columbus International Airport 15%
IND Indianapolis International Airport 15%
MKC Charles B. Wheeler Downtown Airport 15%
OMA Eppley Airfield 15%
BHM Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International Airport 14%
OGG Kahului International Airport 14%
ABQ Albuquerque International Sunport 14%
SAT San Antonio International Airport 13%
STL St. Louis Lambert International Airport 12%
TUS Tucson International Airport / Morris Air National Guard Base 12%
BNA Nashville International Airport 12%
FAT Fresno Yosemite International Airport 11%
EUG Mahlon Sweet Field 11%
GRR Gerald R. Ford International Airport 11%
KOA Ellison Onizuka Kona International Airport at Keahole 11%
HFD Hartford Brainard Airport 10%
OKC Will Rogers World Airport 8%
MYR Myrtle Beach International Airport 7%
MSN Dane County Regional Truax Field 7%
PHX Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport 7%
CHS Charleston International Airport 7%
HAR Capital City Airport 7%
LIT Bill & Hillary Clinton National Airport/Adams Field 6%
PBI Palm Beach International Airport 6%
RIC Richmond International Airport 6%
SRQ Sarasota Bradenton International Airport 6%
DSM Des Moines International Airport 6%
FMY Page Field 6%
HNL Daniel K. Inouye International Airport 5%
FLL Fort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport 5%
ORF Norfolk International Airport 5%
DTW Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport 5%
BOS Logan International Airport 4%
MEM Memphis International Airport 4%
SBA Santa Barbara Municipal Airport 4%
JFK John F. Kennedy International Airport 3%
SLC Salt Lake City International Airport 3%
TPA Tampa International Airport 2%
PSC Tri Cities Airport 2%
GSP Greenville Spartanburg International Airport 2%
FYV Drake Field 2%
MSP Minneapolis–Saint Paul International Airport / Wold‚ Chamberlain Field 2%
MKE General Mitchell International Airport 1%
LAX Los Angeles International Airport 1%
ORD Chicago O'Hare International Airport 1%
MIA Miami International Airport 1%
PSP Palm Springs International Airport 1%
GEG Spokane International Airport 0%
FSD Sioux Falls Regional Airport / Joe Foss Field 0%
SAV Savannah Hilton Head International Airport 0%
LAS Harry Reid International Airport 0%
HOU William P Hobby Airport 0%
JAX Jacksonville International Airport -1%
ORL Orlando Executive Airport -1%
JAN Jackson-Medgar Wiley Evers International Airport -2%
VPS Destin-Fort Walton Beach Airport -2%
SFO San Francisco International Airport -2%
DFW Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport -2%
SEA Seattle‚ Tacoma International Airport -2%
BUF Buffalo Niagara International Airport -3%
RDU Raleigh Durham International Airport -4%
SDF Louisville Muhammad Ali International Airport -5%
IAD Washington Dulles International Airport -5%
ATL Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta International Airport -6%
PNS Pensacola International Airport -6%
HSV Huntsville International Carl T. Jones Field -8%
PDX Portland International Airport -9%
DEN Denver International Airport -11%
ANC Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport -12%
CLE Cleveland Hopkins International Airport -12%
PHL Philadelphia International Airport -13%
CVG Cincinnati Northern Kentucky International Airport -13%
CLT Charlotte Douglas International Airport -14%
TYS McGhee Tyson Airport -15%
SYR Syracuse Hancock International Airport -15%
GSO Piedmont Triad International Airport -24%
CAE Columbia Metropolitan Airport -26%

Across the dataset, changes range from a 111% surge at Long Beach Airport (LGB) to a 26% decline at Columbia Metropolitan Airport (CAE).

While Thanksgiving week air bookings in 2025 have increased 4% compared to last year, mid-sized and secondary airports have seen 9% growth, suggesting travelers are being more deliberate about their destinations as they try to avoid congestion.

West Coast Airports Lead Thanksgiving Arrivals Growth

The strongest growth appears at several California airports. Long Beach (111%), Oakland (84%), and Burbank (39%) rank as the top three increases in Thanksgiving airport destinations in 2025.

These gains suggest that travelers are favoring secondary West Coast airports, especially as San Francisco International Airport sees a 2% decline.

Sacramento Executive Airport (SAC) and San Diego International Airport also both feature a notable 31% rise in 2025 compared to last year’s Thanksgiving week.

Providence’s Theodore Francis Green Memorial State Airport (PVD) posts a 35% increase—one of the stronger gains outside the West Coast.

Thanksgiving Travel Declines Concentrated in the Southeast

The steepest declines in Thanksgiving arrivals in 2025 compared to last year are primarily across Southern airports.

Columbia (CAE) sees a 26% decline, followed closely by Greensboro’s Piedmont Triad (GSO) at -24%.

Other airports such as McGhee Tyson (TYS) in Tennessee, Syracuse Hancock (SYR) in New York, and Charlotte Douglas (CLT) in North Carolina also show double-digit decreases.

Overall, some of the country’s largest airports are seeing significant declines, like Atlanta International Airport (the world’s busiest airport in 2024) expecting 6% fewer arrivals compared to last year.

Other major airports with declines include Dallas/Fort Worth (-2%), Denver International (-11%), and Philadelphia International (-13%), all of which expect significant drops in Thanksgiving travel in 2025.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

To learn more about Thanksgiving in 2025, check out this graphic on the Voronoi app, which breaks down the most affordable grocery stores for Thanksgiving dinner items.

Ranked: AI Hallucination Rates by Model

2025-11-27 23:41:00

Published

on

The following content is sponsored by Terzo

Ranked: AI Hallucination Rates by Model

Key Takeaways

  • Many of today’s AI models struggled when asked to identify and cite news sources from an excerpt, producing frequent errors.
  • The highest overall AI hallucination rate was 94 % for Grok‑3, indicating nearly all its answers were incorrect.

Does your AI always give you the right answer? Unfortunately, its “truth” may be an illusion.

This infographic breaks down AI hallucination rates by model. It’s a preview of the brand-new executive guide from Terzo and Visual Capitalist, AI’s Illusion of Truth: The Data Behind AI Errors.

What are AI Hallucinations?

An “AI hallucination” refers to cases where a language model presents information as fact even though it is false or ungrounded. 

These hallucinations happen because standard training systems reward guessing over showing uncertainty. Think about it this way: if you guess on a multiple choice test, you are more likely to get it right than if you give no answer.

AI Hallucination Rates: The Best and Worst Models

To measure AI hallucination rates, researchers presented models from leading AI companies with news excerpts. They then asked the models to identify the original article, publication, and URL. 

Notably, the researchers specifically chose excerpts that, if pasted into a traditional Google search, returned the original source within the first three results.

The models’ responses were then checked for accuracy. Below, the table shows how often each model got an answer partially or entirely incorrect.

AI Model Hallucination Rate
Perplexity 37%
Copilot 40%
Perplexity Pro 45%
ChatGPT Search 67%
Deepseek Search 68%
Gemini 76%
Grok-2 Search 77%
Grok-3 Search 94%

Source: Columbia Journalism Review, March 2025. Responses where no answer was provided were not considered a hallucination.

Grok‑3 had the worst performance, hallucinating 94% of the time. Perplexity, by contrast, delivered the most accurate answers. 

Notably, paid models fared worse than their free counterparts. Most models failed to express any uncertainty in their answers, despite frequent errors.

Risks & Implications for Business Leaders

For company executives, the takeaway is clear. It’s risky to take an AI model’s answers at face value. Assuming output is accurate without verification can lead to many negative outcomes:

  • Reputational damage
  • Financial losses
  • Legal exposure

With AI agents, where every action builds on the last, the consequences of AI hallucination can compound quickly. That’s why leaders need strategies to keep humans in the loop, verify output, and use a model that’s built on trusted company data.

Visual Capitalist Logo

See the data behind AI’s errors and how to get 99% accuracy in the free executive guide, AI’s Illusion of Truth.

More from Terzo

Subscribe

Mapped: The Average Hourly Wage by U.S. State

2025-11-27 21:08:59

See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app.

Map showing the average hourly wage by U.S. state in 2024.

Use This Visualization

Mapped: The Average Hourly Wage by U.S. State

See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Key Takeaways

  • Washington, D.C. has the highest average hourly wage in the U.S., standing at $51.30.
  • Eight of the 10 lowest-paying states are in the South.

U.S. workers earned an average of $35.06 per hour in 2024, an 8.8% rise in real terms since 2015.

Yet there are wide disparities across states. Average real wages in Washington, D.C. are almost double those in Mississippi. Meanwhile, California’s average, at $39.50, is lifted by the concentration of high-paying jobs in the tech sector.

This graphic shows average hourly real wages by state, based on data from the Economic Policy Institute.

Ranked: Average Hourly Wages in 2024

Below, we show a state-by-state comparison of average real wages in America:

Rank State Average Hourly Wage in 2024
1 District of Columbia $51.27
2 Massachusetts $41.36
3 Washington $41.07
4 California $39.53
5 Colorado $38.15
6 New York $37.90
7 Connecticut $37.85
8 Minnesota $37.58
9 Hawaii $36.86
10 Alaska $36.57
11 New Jersey $36.41
12 Oregon $35.89
13 Rhode Island $35.79
14 New Hampshire $35.22
15 Maryland $34.99
16 Utah $33.93
17 Virginia $33.90
18 North Dakota $33.88
19 Vermont $33.87
20 Illinois $33.77
21 Wisconsin $33.48
22 Arizona $33.19
23 Texas $33.08
24 North Carolina $32.51
25 Florida $32.50
26 Michigan $32.37
27 Georgia $32.14
28 Idaho $31.99
29 Ohio $31.93
30 Pennsylvania $31.79
31 Delaware $31.72
32 Montana $31.66
33 Maine $31.64
34 Missouri $31.58
35 Nebraska $31.48
36 Wyoming $31.21
37 South Dakota $30.72
38 South Carolina $30.69
39 Indiana $30.58
40 Kansas $30.39
41 Nevada $30.39
42 Oklahoma $30.17
43 Alabama $30.13
44 Tennessee $30.09
45 Iowa $29.51
46 Kentucky $29.02
47 Louisiana $28.70
48 West Virginia $28.69
49 Arkansas $28.65
50 New Mexico $28.26
51 Mississippi $26.60
-- United States $35.06

As we can see, Washington, D.C. ranks first, boosted by its share of government employees.

In 2024, federal employees made up 25% of its workforce, with the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice employing the highest number of workers.

Massachusetts follows next, with an average hourly wage of $41.36. The state is known as a hub for biotechnology and engineering, where high-paying jobs are prevalent. Additionally, it is home to Harvard University and Massachusetts Institute for Technology, which produce some of the top-paid college graduates in the country.

Ranking in third is Washington, at $41.07. With a minimum wage of $16.66 in 2025, it has one of the nation’s highest. Overall, five of the top 10 states by average real wages are in the West.

On the other hand, Mississippi and New Mexico had the lowest wages in the country. This highlights clear regional differences in salary outcomes in the U.S., driven by lower economic output and lower-paying industries. Moreover, both states have some of the highest rates of extreme poverty, disproportionately affecting minorities and people of color.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on median full-time salaries by state.

Mapped: Global Real Estate Bubble Risk in 2025

2025-11-27 19:03:11

See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app.

This infographic shows the cities with the highest real estate bubble risk in 2025, with Miami and Tokyo topping the list.

Use This Visualization

Mapped: Global Real Estate Bubble Risk in 2025

See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Key Takeaways

  • Miami tops the 2025 Real Estate Bubble Index with a score of 1.73, placing it firmly in bubble risk territory.
  • Tokyo and Zurich also exceed the bubble risk threshold score of 1.5.
  • Toronto and Hong Kong saw the largest year-over-year declines in bubble risk.

Globally, real estate markets have been cooling over the last few years, with high mortgage rates and unaffordable prices affecting demand in many cities.

However, while housing bubble risks have eased across many markets, home prices in real estate hotspots like Miami and Tokyo continue to rise, inflating their bubble risk.

This infographic shows the cities with the highest bubble risk worldwide based on the UBS Global Real Estate Bubble Index 2025.

Where Housing Markets Look Most Overheated

UBS’ Real Estate Bubble Index evaluates housing markets around the world using a range of indicators, including price-to-income ratios, price-to-rent ratios, and trends in mortgage lending and construction activity.

Cities are classified into three broad categories based on their index score:

  • Bubble Risk: >1.5
  • Overvalued: 0.5 to 1.5
  • Fairly Valued: -0.5 to 0.5

Below is the full 2025 ranking of cities by UBS’s Bubble Index score, along with the annual real price change:

Rank City Bubble Risk Index Score Annual real home price change (2024 to 2025)
1 Miami 1.73 1.9%
2 Tokyo 1.59 5.7%
3 Zurich 1.55 5.0%
4 Los Angeles 1.11 0.9%
5 Dubai 1.09 11.1%
6 Amsterdam 1.06 1.2%
7 Geneva 1.05 4.1%
8 Toronto 0.8 -7.5%
9 Sydney 0.8 0.8%
10 Madrid 0.77 13.6%
11 Frankfurt 0.76 -1.2%
12 Vancouver 0.76 -5.9%
13 Munich 0.64 1.4%
14 Singapore 0.55 2.6%
15 Hong Kong 0.44 -7.9%
16 London 0.34 -2.1%
17 San Francisco 0.28 -2.6%
18 New York 0.26 -1.5%
19 Paris 0.25 0.1%
20 Milan 0.01 -2.7%
21 São Paulo -0.1 0.0%

The majority of cities in the index saw their bubble risk decline since 2024, with Toronto and Hong Kong experiencing the largest drops.

However, bubble risk rose in Miami, which ranks highest with an index score of 1.73, supported by rising home prices. Tokyo and Zurich also sit above the critical 1.5 threshold.

Meanwhile, several real estate markets fall into the overvalued range but remain below the bubble-risk territory. These include Madrid, which saw the strongest rise in real home prices, up 13.6% from 2024 to 2025.

Dubai is another notable city in the overvalued bucket, with prices rising by over 11% year-over-year. According to UBS, average real prices in Dubai have grown by around 50% over the last five years. However, prices could potentially cool off in 2026 following a record increase in supply.

Where Real Estate Bubble Risk Declined in 2025

Several housing markets are undergoing corrections after the post-pandemic uproar in prices.

Toronto, one of the world’s most unaffordable housing markets, has seen its bubble risk score fall sharply, accompanied by a -7.5% real home price decline. Hong Kong saw an even larger drop in price levels, at -7.9%, pushing it into the fairly-valued category.

Other cities, including Vancouver, Frankfurt, London, and San Francisco, also reported price declines as affordability constraints and higher borrowing costs weighed on demand.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

To learn more about this topic, see this graphic on the world’s most expensive housing markets on Voronoi.

Mean vs. Median: Visualizing Net Worth in the U.S. by Age Group

2025-11-26 23:47:01

See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app.

Graphic comparing mean and median average net worth by age in America

Use This Visualization

Mean vs. Median: Visualizing Net Worth in the U.S. by Age

See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Key Takeaways

  • Mean net worth is the average calculated by adding all net worth values and dividing by the number of households, making it sensitive to very wealthy outliers.
  • Median net worth represents the middle value where half of households have more and half have less, giving a clearer view of the typical household’s financial position.

The relationship between age and wealth offers insight into how financial security builds over time. In this graphic, we compare the mean and median household net worth across age groups, showing how dramatically the two averages can differ.

Due to extreme wealth (e.g. the presence of billionaires), the mean average paints a more optimistic picture than what most households actually experience. As a result, looking at both averages side by side gives a more complete view of American wealth.

Data & Discussion

The data for this visualization comes from Empower. It compares the average net worth by age in America.

Age by decade Mean Average Median Average
20s $121,004 $6,609
30s $307,343 $24,247
40s $743,456 $75,719
50s $1,330,746 $191,857
60s $1,547,378 $290,447
70s $1,444,413 $233,085
80s $1,342,656 $233,436
90s $1,212,583 $205,043

How Net Worth is Calculated

Net worth is the total value of your assets minus your liabilities. Here’s a summary of what the Federal Reserve includes under each category.

Assets include:

  • 💵 Cash within bank accounts
  • 📈 Investment accounts and life insurance policies
  • 🏦 Retirement accounts, including IRAs and 401(k)s
  • 🏠 Value of real estate and vehicles

Meanwhile, liabilities include:

  • 🏡 Mortgages
  • 🏠 Home equity lines of credit or home equity loans
  • 💳 Credit card balances
  • 🚗 Installment loans, including personal loans, auto loans, and student loans

The Difference Between Mean and Median

Across every age group in the dataset, the mean net worth is larger than the median. For example, Americans in their 40s have a mean net worth of $743,456, yet the median sits at just $75,719.

This is because the mean is calculated by adding up all of the values in a dataset and dividing the total by the number of entries. As a result, very wealthy households pull the overall numbers upward.

On the other hand, the median is calculated by ordering all values from lowest to highest, and then selecting the middle one. This can be interpreted as a more realistic measure because it ignores the influence of a small number of extremely wealthy households.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Countries With the Most High Net Worth Individuals on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.

Mapped: Wage Growth by State (2024-2025)

2025-11-26 21:06:29

See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app.

Map showing wage growth by state: See which parts of the U.S. saw the strongest real wage gains in 2024–2025, with Idaho and Mississippi leading the nation.

Use This Visualization

Mapped: Wage Growth by State (2024-2025)

See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Key Takeaways

  • Real wages (wages adjusted for inflation) increased in 42 states and D.C. over the past year ending June 2025.
  • Idaho and Mississippi saw the strongest average wage gains at 6.7% and 5.0%.

Real wage growth in the U.S. has become a central focus as inflation and new tariffs continue to strain Americans’ purchasing power.

Nationally, between July 2024 and June 2025, the nominal average wage rose from $1,200 to $1,250 per week—a $50 increase, or 4.2% growth. After adjusting for inflation, real wages grew 2.5%, giving workers about $30 more in weekly purchasing power.

This map highlights how each state performed in the 12 months ending June 2025, showing where workers are gaining purchasing power, and where they are still falling behind. The data for this visualization comes from USAFacts.

States Leading Wage Growth

Idaho and Mississippi top the nation, with real wages rising 6.7% and 5.0%. Both states have seen rapid population inflows and tight labor markets, contributing to stronger wage pressures.

Other high-performing states, including Georgia, Vermont, and Kansas, also recorded gains above 3%.

State Real wage growth (Avg.)
Idaho 6.7%
Mississippi 5.0%
Georgia 4.3%
Vermont 4.0%
Kansas 3.4%
Texas 3.2%
Nevada 3.1%
Arizona 2.7%
Florida 2.7%
Virginia 2.7%
Colorado 2.6%
Wyoming 2.6%
Alabama 2.3%
Indiana 2.3%
Connecticut 2.2%
New Jersey 2.2%
Ohio 2.2%
Oregon 2.1%
Arkansas 2.0%
Missouri 1.9%
Montana 1.8%
Oklahoma 1.8%
DC 1.7%
Wisconsin 1.7%
New Mexico 1.5%
North Carolina 1.5%
Maine 1.4%
Nebraska 1.2%
California 1.1%
South Carolina 1.1%
Alaska 1.0%
Minnesota 1.0%
Delaware 0.9%
Utah 0.9%
Washington 0.9%
West Virginia 0.9%
Pennsylvania 0.8%
Hawaii 0.5%
Kentucky 0.4%
Illinois 0.3%
Iowa 0.3%
Massachusetts 0.3%
Rhode Island 0.2%
Louisiana -0.1%
Maryland -0.2%
Michigan -0.2%
New York -0.4%
North Dakota -0.7%
South Dakota -0.7%
Tennessee -1.2%
New Hampshire -1.7%
U.S. National Average 2.5%

Moderate but Positive Growth Across Much of the Country

A large portion of states saw real wage gains between 1% and 3%. This group includes major population centers like Texas, Florida, Virginia, and Colorado.

Steady job creation and cooling inflation have helped wages outpace consumer prices in these areas.

Where Wage Growth Is Falling Behind

Eight states recorded negative real wage growth, meaning inflation outpaced pay increases. New Hampshire, Tennessee, and the Dakotas saw some of the largest declines, reflecting weaker labor market conditions.

New York and Michigan also posted modest decreases, suggesting ongoing economic transitions are weighing on earnings. These pockets of decline stand out against the broader national trend of improvement.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Ranked: The Cities Americans Are Moving To on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.