2026-04-03 00:37:01
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Layoffs in tech are increasingly concentrated among a handful of giant companies. Amazon, Intel, and Microsoft alone dominate this ranking, far outpacing the rest of the industry.
While the pace of layoffs has slowed from earlier peaks, companies are still trimming headcount as they balance profitability, slower growth, and increased investment in AI.
This visualization ranks the 15 tech companies that have cut the most jobs across 2025 and 2026 as of March 16, based on data from Layoffs.fyi.
Amazon leads the ranking with 30,184 disclosed layoffs, followed by Intel at 27,058 and Microsoft at 15,347. Together, these three companies account for nearly two-thirds of all layoffs shown.
The data table below shows the top 15 companies by disclosed layoffs in 2025 and 2026 as of March 16, 2026:
| Rank | Company | Disclosed Layoffs in 2025 and 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon | 30,184 |
| 2 | Intel | 27,058 |
| 3 | Microsoft | 15,347 |
| 4 | HP | 8,000 |
| 5 | Meta | 5,800 |
| 6 | Salesforce | 5,385 |
| 7 | Block | 4,931 |
| 8 | Northvolt | 2,800 |
| 9 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise | 2,552 |
| 10 | Autodesk | 2,350 |
| 11 | Workday | 2,150 |
| 12 | Synopsys | 2,000 |
| 13 | WiseTech | 2,000 |
| 14 | Atlassian | 1,950 |
| 15 | ASML | 1,700 |
Since 2020, Amazon has disclosed layoffs of around 58,000 employees. While this is more than many companies’ entire workforce, for Amazon it represents less than 4% of its 1.56 million employees.
The next major Big Tech company on the list is Meta with 5,800 disclosed layoffs, and reports note that the company is eyeing additional 2026 cuts that could reduce headcount by 20%.
Many of the largest tech layoffs in 2025 and 2026 reflect a similar set of pressures: slower growth, tighter cost controls, and increased investment in AI.
Some companies have been explicit about AI’s role. Block, for example, cut nearly half its workforce in 2026 with 4,000 layoffs, as CEO Jack Dorsey pointed to AI automation as a driver of a broader, one-time reorganization instead of smaller, ongoing cuts. Following his announcement, the company’s share price rose more than 20% in a single day.
In other cases, companies have emphasized structural changes rather than AI directly. At Amazon, January 2026 layoffs were part of efforts to reduce management layers, streamline decision-making, and reallocate resources toward priority areas, while continuing to hire in select roles.
Intel, meanwhile, tied its cuts to a broader multiyear turnaround. The company said it aims to align its cost structure with a new operating model, pursue $10 billion in 2025 cost savings, and simplify operations amid ongoing margin pressure.
If you enjoyed today’s post, check the world’s fastest growing jobs on Voronoi.
2026-04-02 23:31:00
Global perceptions of the United States are shifting. Data from the Munich Security Conference shows a clear decline in trust across advanced and emerging economies.
This visualization, created in partnership with Inigo, provides visual context to these shifting perceptions and highlights where sentiment is changing fastest. These shifts reflect a broader reassessment of alliances in a more uncertain world.
Among traditional allies, the drop in trust is sharp. Canada records the steepest decline at -52%. Italy follows at -21%. France stands at -17%.
| Country | Trust in the United States (% change in perception) |
|---|---|
| United Kingdom | -13 |
| Italy | -21 |
| France | -17 |
| Japan | -16 |
| Brazil | -20 |
| India | -10 |
| Canada | -52 |
| Germany | -15 |
| South Africa | -21 |
| China | -9 |
Germany and Japan also show meaningful declines at -15% and -16%. The United Kingdom is down -13%. These are not isolated moves. They point to weakening confidence across long-standing partnerships.
Policy uncertainty is one key driver. Shifting trade positions and tariff threats have strained economic relationships. Rhetoric around territorial expansion has also raised concerns, including proposals to annex Greenland and suggestions that Canada could become the 51st state.
At the same time, security concerns are rising across Europe. A January 2026 Eurobarometer poll shows 43% of respondents in France and 32% in Germany support higher defense spending. This suggests allies are preparing for a more uncertain security environment.
The pattern extends beyond Western allies. Brazil and South Africa both decline by more than -20%. India and China show smaller but still negative shifts at -10% and -9%.
This suggests a broad reset in global sentiment. It is not driven by one region alone. Strategic uncertainty is rising across markets.
The data points to a more fragmented global landscape. Trust in the United States is declining across multiple regions. At the same time, countries are preparing for greater uncertainty.
Rising defense support in Europe reinforces this shift. Public sentiment is signaling change. Global alliances may be entering a new phase.
Explore a Data-Driven View of Risk.
Across the U.S., the ground beneath many major cities is gradually subsiding. 25 out of America’s 28 largest cities are slowly sinking.
Wildfires in the United States are becoming more destructive, with many of the most severe seasons occurring in the past decade.
As housing spreads into the fire line, exposure is rising sharply, compounding loss potential and challenging long-term insurability.
Rising labor and material costs mean every insured dollar now rebuilds less, widening the recovery gap after disasters across the United States.
Lower interest rates have often supported stronger real estate returns and improved valuations. Will that trend return in 2026?
From climate volatility to economic and technological shifts, a wide range of forces are reshaping property risk in the U.S.
Hurricanes are a defining force in the U.S. climate, capable of leaving behind profound environmental, social, and economic devastation.
Global temperatures are climbing—but how is this trend playing out across the United States, and which regions are being hit the hardest?
Wildfire events are growing increasingly frequent and destructive around the world as human-driven climate impacts continue to escalate.
Drought grips much of the U.S., affecting over 60 million people today.
Weight loss drugs have surged in popularity in recent years, transforming the pharmaceutical landscape. Which brands are dominating this space?
The pharmaceutical industry has made enormous strides in treating—and even curing—a wide range of diseases and conditions. Which areas are seeing the most R&D in 2025?
Pharma giants don’t just make medicine—they shape the future of healthcare. Who are the world’s major players?
The fraud and financial crime landscapes are evolving rapidly. What are the key threats shaping risk in 2025?
Some of the largest digital heists didn’t rely on brute-force hacking, they exploited the weakest link in security: human trust.
As cybersecurity threats escalate, which financial crimes are causing the most harm? The FBI has the data.
Suspicious activity has been rising in the U.S., but is it spread evenly throughout all 50 states? Certainly not.
As technology and AI become more widespread, fraud and other suspicious activity are rising across America. Which types are the most common?
From money laundering to fraud, financial crime acts as a drain on the economy, totaling an incredible $3.1 trillion.
Over half the global population is ruled by non-centrist types of government, including autocracies and left or right wing parties.
Ukraine will require an estimated $524B over the next decade to recover from the Russia-Ukraine war. Which sectors have been most impacted?
Amid tariff increases, consumers’ expectations for U.S. inflation in the next five years have reached their highest level since March 1991.
In his first 100 days, President Trump has issued far more executive orders than any other president in history.
2026-04-02 22:19:59
See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app.
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Data center construction is accelerating across the U.S. as demand for AI, cloud computing, and digital services continues to climb.
This surge is shifting where new infrastructure gets built—and which states are poised to dominate in the years ahead.
This graphic ranks states by their total pipeline of data centers, including operational sites, projects under construction, and announced developments. The data comes from Aterio, as of March 2026.
Texas is on track to surpass Virginia as the top U.S. data center hub, with a projected 962 total sites across operational, under-construction, and announced projects.
Currently, Texas has just 212 operating data centers and 140 under construction.
The data table below shows the number of current, in construction, and announced data centers in each U.S. state:
| State | Operational | Under construction | Announced | Total Data Centers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | 212 | 140 | 610 | 962 |
| Virginia | 320 | 136 | 498 | 954 |
| Georgia | 62 | 56 | 340 | 458 |
| Pennsylvania | 37 | 11 | 209 | 257 |
| Arizona | 83 | 35 | 136 | 254 |
| Ohio | 101 | 51 | 98 | 250 |
| Illinois | 78 | 19 | 153 | 250 |
| California | 166 | 6 | 40 | 212 |
| Utah | 29 | 10 | 117 | 156 |
| Oregon | 97 | 14 | 33 | 144 |
| Nevada | 27 | 29 | 75 | 134 |
| New York | 50 | 3 | 72 | 125 |
| Indiana | 28 | 23 | 69 | 120 |
| Iowa | 58 | 15 | 38 | 111 |
| Washington | 71 | 3 | 26 | 100 |
| North Carolina | 43 | 12 | 40 | 95 |
| Minnesota | 27 | 4 | 45 | 76 |
| New Mexico | 13 | 5 | 52 | 70 |
| Missouri | 24 | 8 | 37 | 69 |
| Florida | 53 | 2 | 12 | 67 |
| Oklahoma | 22 | 9 | 34 | 65 |
| Alabama | 15 | 8 | 36 | 59 |
| Wisconsin | 18 | 12 | 28 | 58 |
| New Jersey | 49 | 2 | 6 | 57 |
| Michigan | 31 | 1 | 21 | 53 |
| Mississippi | 10 | 21 | 19 | 50 |
| Colorado | 31 | 6 | 10 | 47 |
| Kentucky | 10 | 2 | 34 | 46 |
| Wyoming | 12 | 8 | 25 | 45 |
| West Virginia | 4 | 0 | 39 | 43 |
| Connecticut | 7 | 0 | 33 | 40 |
| Nebraska | 26 | 5 | 8 | 39 |
| South Carolina | 18 | 12 | 8 | 38 |
| Tennessee | 31 | 3 | 3 | 37 |
| Louisiana | 10 | 11 | 16 | 37 |
| Maryland | 12 | 12 | 10 | 34 |
| Massachusetts | 23 | 0 | 0 | 23 |
| Kansas | 8 | 1 | 11 | 20 |
| Arkansas | 4 | 2 | 12 | 18 |
| Montana | 4 | 0 | 11 | 15 |
| North Dakota | 2 | 4 | 8 | 14 |
| Idaho | 4 | 2 | 6 | 12 |
| Maine | 4 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| Delaware | 6 | 0 | 3 | 9 |
| South Dakota | 2 | 0 | 6 | 8 |
| New Hampshire | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| District Of Columbia | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Rhode Island | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Hawaii | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Vermont | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Knocked to the second spot, Virginia would be home to 954 data centers. It currently has 320 operational sites and 136 under construction.
Aterio categorizes projects as announced when there is a building permit, utility filing, or public announcement for a data center that hasn’t yet broken ground. When it does, the company swaps the project to under construction.
It takes around two years to build such a facility, though this is highly dependent on the size, chosen site, and permitting.
While Texas and Virginia are miles ahead of others on both current and prospective data centers, the rankings of states beneath them are set to change substantially.
California and Ohio are the only two other states that have operational data centers topping 100, at 166 and 101, respectively. However, California looks to be in eighth place for the most future data centers, with a total of 212. Ohio would be number six, at 250 data centers.
Georgia is emerging as one of the fastest-growing data center hubs in the country. Its pipeline of 340 announced projects alone is more than five times its current number of operational facilities. Pennsylvania will also experience skyrocketing growth, at 594.6%, as it moves from 37 data centers to a possible 257.
New Hampshire, the District Of Columbia, Rhode Island, Hawaii and Vermont each have no data centers under construction or announced.
Interestingly, Vermont and New Hampshire are among the 11 states that are considering a moratorium or restrictions on the construction of new data centers. Vermont currently has just one operational data center, while New Hampshire has six.
Access to power is becoming the biggest constraint on data center expansion, increasingly determining which states can support new development. As the best sites are snapped up and the data center industry shows few signs of slowing, developers will be forced to look at different locations.
To work around power constraints, some developers are securing dedicated energy sources or co-locating new generation alongside data centers—further shaping where future hubs can emerge.
Disused industrial sites that already have a connection to the grid are also catching the eyes of developers, as they can bypass some of these challenges.
To learn more about the data center build out, check out this graphic which shows global data center demand by region.
2026-04-02 20:05:59
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
America’s export economy is far more concentrated than one would expect.
In 2025, just six states—Texas, California, New York, Louisiana, Illinois, and Florida—accounted for over half of all U.S. exports. Together, they generated roughly $1 trillion in trade, out of a $2.1 trillion total.
Texas stands far above the rest. The state alone makes up 21.8% of U.S. exports, meaning more than one in every five export dollars originates there.
Using the latest data from the U.S. Census Bureau, this chart shows how export activity is heavily concentrated across a small group of states, with most contributing only a fraction of the total.
With $450 billion in goods exports in 2025, Texas surpasses major global economies, including India ($445 billion) and Russia ($419 billion).
Despite a slight 1% annual decline, Texas exports have surged 81% over the past decade, driven largely by energy and industrial output. This highlights how a single U.S. state plays an outsized role not just nationally, but globally.
The table below shows how Texas’s scale of exports compare to the rest of America:
| Rank | State | Share of Total | Value | Change 2024-2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Texas | 21.8% | $450.3B | -1% |
| 2 | California | 9.1% | $188.4B | 2% |
| 3 | New York | 7.4% | $153.1B | 63% |
| 4 | Louisiana | 4.5% | $93.4B | 8% |
| 5 | Illinois | 3.9% | $80.0B | -2% |
| 6 | Florida | 3.8% | $78.9B | 9% |
| 7 | Indiana | 3.3% | $68.8B | 14% |
| 8 | Washington | 3.2% | $65.3B | 13% |
| 9 | Georgia | 2.9% | $60.3B | 13% |
| 10 | Michigan | 2.8% | $58.3B | -7% |
| 11 | Ohio | 2.7% | $55.9B | -3% |
| 12 | Pennsylvania | 2.5% | $52.2B | -2% |
| 13 | Kentucky | 2.5% | $50.6B | 6% |
| 14 | Arizona | 2.2% | $44.4B | 37% |
| 15 | New Jersey | 2.1% | $44.2B | 2% |
| 16 | North Carolina | 2.1% | $43.8B | 2% |
| 17 | Massachusetts | 1.9% | $38.8B | 11% |
| 18 | South Carolina | 1.9% | $38.5B | 1% |
| 19 | Tennessee | 1.8% | $37.7B | -4% |
| 20 | Oregon | 1.4% | $28.0B | -17% |
| 21 | Wisconsin | 1.3% | $27.1B | -2% |
| 22 | Alabama | 1.1% | $23.7B | -12% |
| 23 | Minnesota | 1.1% | $23.5B | -13% |
| 24 | Utah | 1.1% | $22.4B | 23% |
| 25 | Virginia | 0.9% | $19.0B | -12% |
| 26 | Missouri | 0.9% | $18.7B | -3% |
| 27 | Connecticut | 0.9% | $17.7B | 2% |
| 28 | Maryland | 0.8% | $16.5B | -8% |
| 29 | Iowa | 0.8% | $16.2B | -5% |
| 30 | New Mexico | 0.7% | $15.3B | 27% |
| 31 | Kansas | 0.7% | $14.6B | 1% |
| 32 | Mississippi | 0.7% | $14.2B | 3% |
| 33 | Nevada | 0.6% | $12.7B | 22% |
| 34 | Colorado | 0.5% | $11.0B | 4% |
| 35 | North Dakota | 0.4% | $8.6B | 26% |
| 36 | Nebraska | 0.4% | $7.8B | -5% |
| 37 | Oklahoma | 0.4% | $7.5B | -4% |
| 38 | New Hampshire | 0.3% | $7.2B | 1% |
| 39 | Alaska | 0.3% | $6.7B | 13% |
| 40 | Arkansas | 0.3% | $6.6B | -4% |
| 41 | Delaware | 0.3% | $5.5B | 15% |
| 42 | West Virginia | 0.2% | $4.6B | -5% |
| 43 | Idaho | 0.2% | $4.6B | 7% |
| 44 | Rhode Island | 0.2% | $4.2B | 36% |
| 45 | Dist of Columbia | 0.2% | $3.7B | N/A |
| 46 | Maine | 0.2% | $3.2B | 2% |
| 47 | Montana | 0.1% | $2.1B | -12% |
| 48 | Vermont | 0.1% | $2.1B | 9% |
| 49 | Wyoming | 0.1% | $2.0B | -4% |
| 50 | South Dakota | 0.1% | $1.9B | -13% |
| 51 | Hawaii | 0.0% | $0.4B | -14% |
Louisiana is another standout, known for its massive LNG industry.
While it accounts for just 1.1% of U.S. GDP, it generates 4.5% of total exports, exceeding Florida, despite having a population nearly five times smaller. This imbalance underscores the importance of energy hubs in driving U.S. trade.
California, meanwhile, contributes 9.1% of exports ($188.4 billion), with Washington (3.2%) and Arizona (2.2%) also playing key roles across the West.
Beyond the top exporters, there’s a steep drop-off.
A total of 27 states each account for less than 1% of U.S. exports, with many contributing just a fraction of that. Smaller states like South Dakota, Wyoming, and Vermont each generate roughly 0.1% of exports, reflecting both their size and limited industrial base.
This level of concentration reveals how dependent U.S. trade is on a small number of states, particularly energy and manufacturing hubs.
While this concentration can drive efficiency, it also creates vulnerabilities. Economic shocks, policy changes, or disruptions in just a few regions could have an outsized impact on the entire U.S. export economy.
To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on the countries that rely most on imported energy.
2026-04-01 23:52:22
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
A small group of companies dominates the global arms industry, with a clear leader at the top.
This chart, created by Iswardi Ishak using data from SIPRI, ranks the top 20 defense companies by arms sales in 2024. Lockheed Martin stands well ahead of its peers, highlighting the industry’s concentration among a handful of major contractors.
U.S. firms play an outsized role at the top of the ranking, while China and Europe continue to expand their presence, pointing to a gradually shifting global landscape.
U.S. companies account for six of the top 10 firms by arms revenue, reflecting their scale in high-cost, long-cycle defense programs. From fighter jets to missile defense systems, these projects create steady, long-term revenue streams.
| Rank | Company | Arms Revenue ($B) | Arms Revenue as % of Total Revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
 Lockheed Martin Corp. |
64.65 | 91.0 |
| 2 |
RTX Corporation |
43.60 | 54.0 |
| 3 |
Northrop Grumman |
37.85 | 92.2 |
| 4 |
 BAE Systems |
33.79 | 95.4 |
| 5 |
General Dynamics |
33.63 | 70.4 |
| 6 |
Boeing |
30.55 | 45.9 |
| 7 |
 Rostec |
27.12 | 69.7 |
| 8 |
 Aviation Industry Corp. |
20.32 | 25.0 |
| 9 |
China Electronics Technology Group |
18.92 | 34.3 |
| 10 |
L3Harris Technologies |
16.21 | 76.0 |
| 11 |
NORINCO |
13.97 | 22.7 |
| 12 |
 Leonardo |
13.83 | 72.0 |
| 13 |
 Airbus |
13.37 | 17.9 |
| 14 |
China State Shipbuilding Corp. |
12.33 | 24.8 |
| 15 |
 Thales |
11.80 | 53.0 |
| 16 |
Huntington Ingalls Industries |
10.28 | 89.1 |
| 17 |
China Aerospace Science and Technology Corp. |
10.23 | 30.0 |
| 18 |
Leidos |
9.37 | 56.2 |
| 19 |
Amentum |
8.33 | 60.1 |
| 20 |
 Rheinmetall |
8.24 | 78.1 |
Together, these companies generate hundreds of billions in arms sales, but revenue is concentrated among the top players.
Lockheed Martin leads with nearly $65 billion in arms revenue, well ahead of RTX and Northrop Grumman.
General Dynamics, Boeing, and L3Harris Technologies also rank in the top 10, giving U.S. firms six of the top spots.
European firms remain major players, though their revenues trail the largest U.S. contractors. BAE Systems ranks fourth overall, while Leonardo, Airbus, Thales, and Rheinmetall also appear in the top 20.
Chinese state-owned enterprises feature prominently, including AVIC, CETC, NORINCO, China State Shipbuilding Corporation, and China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation. Together, they reflect China’s expanding defense industrial base across aerospace, electronics, and shipbuilding.
Where do the world’s nuclear warheads reside? Check out this visualization to learn more.
2026-04-01 21:47:28
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Property taxes are one of the biggest ongoing costs of owning a home, and in some states they can add thousands of dollars a year to the price of staying put.
The U.S. national median annual property tax bill sits at $2,937, and the gap between the highest- and lowest-bill states stretches into the thousands of dollars.
This map shows the median annual property tax bill for owner-occupied homes by state using data from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey 2024 1-Year Estimates, the latest available data as of March 2026.
New Jersey ranks first by a wide margin, with a median annual property tax bill of $9,358. It is followed by New Hampshire at $6,707, Connecticut at $6,573, New York at $6,542, and Massachusetts at $6,080.
Overall, seven of the top 10 states are in the Northeast, underscoring how heavily many local governments in the region rely on property taxes to fund schools and municipal services.
The table below ranks all 50 states by median annual property tax bill, from highest to lowest.
| Rank | State | Median Annual Property Tax Bill |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Jersey | $9,358 |
| 2 | New Hampshire | $6,707 |
| 3 | Connecticut | $6,573 |
| 4 | New York | $6,542 |
| 5 | Massachusetts | $6,080 |
| 6 | Illinois | $5,399 |
| 7 | California | $5,369 |
| 8 | Vermont | $5,026 |
| 9 | Rhode Island | $4,886 |
| 10 | Washington | $4,729 |
| 11 | District of Columbia | $4,594 |
| 12 | Maryland | $4,144 |
| 13 | Texas | $4,108 |
| 14 | Alaska | $3,976 |
| 15 | Oregon | $3,895 |
| 16 | Nebraska | $3,739 |
| 17 | Wisconsin | $3,680 |
| 18 | Minnesota | $3,501 |
| 19 | Pennsylvania | $3,214 |
| 20 | Maine | $3,103 |
| 21 | Florida | $2,993 |
| 22 | Michigan | $2,988 |
| 23 | Kansas | $2,983 |
| 24 | South Dakota | $2,940 |
| 25 | Montana | $2,939 |
| 26 | Iowa | $2,937 |
| 27 | Ohio | $2,937 |
| 28 | Virginia | $2,872 |
| 29 | Colorado | $2,828 |
| 30 | Utah | $2,648 |
| 31 | Georgia | $2,554 |
| 32 | North Dakota | $2,550 |
| 33 | Hawaii | $2,385 |
| 34 | Nevada | $2,143 |
| 35 | North Carolina | $2,044 |
| 36 | Missouri | $2,021 |
| 37 | Wyoming | $1,947 |
| 38 | Idaho | $1,912 |
| 39 | Arizona | $1,828 |
| 40 | Indiana | $1,798 |
| 41 | New Mexico | $1,776 |
| 42 | Delaware | $1,750 |
| 43 | Oklahoma | $1,672 |
| 44 | Kentucky | $1,611 |
| 45 | Tennessee | $1,488 |
| 46 | South Carolina | $1,337 |
| 47 | Mississippi | $1,221 |
| 48 | Louisiana | $1,187 |
| 49 | Arkansas | $1,113 |
| 50 | Alabama | $890 |
| 51 | West Virginia | $881 |
At the other end of the map, West Virginia has the lowest median bill at $881, followed closely by Alabama at $890. Arkansas ($1,113), Louisiana ($1,187), and Mississippi ($1,221) also sit well below the national median of $2,937.
Outside the Northeast, California ($5,369) and Washington ($4,729) stand out for high dollar bills driven in part by elevated home values.
Property tax bills are driven by two factors: home values and how much local governments rely on property taxes.
This is why high-value states like California can generate large bills even with moderate rates, while lower-cost states tend to produce smaller annual burdens overall.
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Mapped: Average House Prices by State on Voronoi.
