2026-04-11 21:26:09
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
What makes a country “polite”—and which ones stand out globally?
A new survey of over 4,600 respondents by Remitly reveals a clear frontrunner. Japan alone captured more than 35% of all votes, far ahead of every other country on the list.
The ranking highlights how perceptions of politeness vary worldwide, while also revealing strong regional patterns across Europe and Asia.
Perceptions of politeness can shape everything from tourism experiences to international business relationships. For travelers, these rankings often influence expectations around etiquette, hospitality, and day-to-day interactions abroad.
Japan stands far ahead of every other country, capturing 35.2% of all votes—nearly three times more than second-place Canada. No other country breaks even 15%, underscoring just how dominant Japan’s reputation is globally.
Japanese culture is famous for its high emphasis on respect, etiquette, and social harmony. The country’s blend of tradition and recognizable cultural exports has helped it become well-regarded nearly everywhere.
The following data table lists the 25 most polite countries worldwide.
| Rank | Country | Most Polite Nations (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Japan |
35.2% |
| 2 |
Canada |
13.4% |
| 3 |
United Kingdom |
6.2% |
| 4 |
China |
3.1% |
| 5 |
Germany |
2.8% |
| 6 |
Philippines |
2.3% |
| 7 |
Sweden |
2.3% |
| 8 |
Denmark |
2.1% |
| 9 |
Finland |
1.9% |
| 10 |
South Africa |
1.8% |
| 11 |
Australia |
1.7% |
| 11 |
Switzerland |
1.7% |
| 13 |
United States |
1.6% |
| 14 |
India |
1.5% |
| 15 |
Ireland |
1.5% |
| 16 |
New Zealand |
1.4% |
| 17 |
Norway |
1.2% |
| 18 |
Netherlands |
1.2% |
| 19 |
Thailand |
1.2% |
| 19 |
France |
1.2% |
| 21 |
Brazil |
1.1% |
| 22 |
Spain |
1.1% |
| 23 |
Belgium |
1.0% |
| 24 |
Italy |
1.0% |
| 25 |
Austria |
1.0% |
Certain traits associated with local culture no doubt contribute to the Japanese people’s reputation of politeness, including the value placed on cleanliness and punctuality.
Beyond this, citizens of other countries may be surprised when encountering Japanese bowing, a way of conveying respect, as well as other unique elements such as relative silence on public transit within the country.
Canada ranks second with 13.4% of the vote—less than half of Japan’s total, highlighting the gap between first place and the rest of the field.
The sprawling North American country has been deemed the most respected country worldwide by one measure, while Canadians have long been known as some of the friendliest people on the globe.
Canada’s hospitality and civility has boosted the country’s reputation for politeness, both in dealings with each other and with people from other countries. This has been reinforced in some corners by the country’s relative contrasts with its southern neighbor, the United States, which obtained just over a tenth of the share of votes (1.6%) of Canada.
After Canada, the United Kingdom ranks third at 6.2%, leading a strong European showing. In total, European countries make up more than half of the top 25—suggesting that politeness, as perceived globally, is strongly associated with the region.
Northern Europeans appear to fare better than their peers across the Old Continent, with the UK joined in the top 10 by Germany (2.8%) and Nordic countries like Sweden (2.3%), Denmark (2.1%), and Finland (1.9%).
In contrast, Asian countries nabbed a fifth of the spots on the list, while Africa was home to only one country in the top 25: South Africa, which at 1.8% of all votes cast landed at the 10th position worldwide.
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out The Best Countries For Culture & Heritage, As Determined by the People on Voronoi.Use This Visualization
2026-04-11 19:44:32
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
From Denali in Alaska to Britton Hill in Florida, the highest points in each U.S. state reveal a dramatic divide in elevation across the country.
This map shows the tallest natural point in every state, measured in feet above sea level, using data from the USGS via the U.S. Census Bureau’s Statistical Abstract.
The differences are stark: Alaska rises above 20,000 feet, while several coastal states don’t even reach 1,000 feet.
Alaska dominates the ranking. Its highest point, Denali, reaches 20,320 ft—5,826 ft higher than California’s Mount Whitney in second place. This single gap is larger than the entire elevation range of many eastern states, highlighting just how extreme Alaska’s terrain is.
That makes Denali nearly 59 times taller than Florida’s highest point, underscoring the extreme range in U.S. elevation.
The data table below ranks all 50 U.S. states by their highest elevation measured in feet above sea level:
| Rank | State | Highest Elevation (in feet) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alaska | 20,320 |
| 2 | California | 14,494 |
| 3 | Colorado | 14,433 |
| 4 | Washington | 14,411 |
| 5 | Wyoming | 13,804 |
| 6 | Hawaii | 13,796 |
| 7 | Utah | 13,528 |
| 8 | New Mexico | 13,161 |
| 9 | Nevada | 13,140 |
| 10 | Montana | 12,799 |
| 11 | Idaho | 12,662 |
| 12 | Arizona | 12,633 |
| 13 | Oregon | 11,239 |
| 14 | Texas | 8,749 |
| 15 | South Dakota | 7,242 |
| 16 | North Carolina | 6,684 |
| 17 | Tennessee | 6,643 |
| 18 | New Hampshire | 6,288 |
| 19 | Virginia | 5,729 |
| 20 | Nebraska | 5,424 |
| 21 | New York | 5,344 |
| 22 | Maine | 5,268 |
| 23 | Oklahoma | 4,973 |
| 24 | West Virginia | 4,863 |
| 25 | Georgia | 4,784 |
| 26 | Vermont | 4,393 |
| 27 | Kentucky | 4,145 |
| 28 | Kansas | 4,039 |
| 29 | South Carolina | 3,560 |
| 30 | North Dakota | 3,506 |
| 31 | Massachusetts | 3,491 |
| 32 | Maryland | 3,360 |
| 33 | Pennsylvania | 3,213 |
| 34 | Arkansas | 2,753 |
| 35 | Alabama | 2,407 |
| 36 | Connecticut | 2,380 |
| 37 | Minnesota | 2,301 |
| 38 | Michigan | 1,979 |
| 39 | Wisconsin | 1,951 |
| 40 | New Jersey | 1,803 |
| 41 | Missouri | 1,772 |
| 42 | Iowa | 1,670 |
| 43 | Ohio | 1,550 |
| 44 | Indiana | 1,257 |
| 45 | Illinois | 1,235 |
| 46 | Rhode Island | 812 |
| 47 | Mississippi | 806 |
| 48 | Louisiana | 535 |
| 49 | Delaware | 448 |
| 50 | Florida | 345 |
A clear geographic pattern emerges: every state above 10,000 ft lies west of the Mississippi River. These peaks cluster in major mountain systems like the Rockies, Sierra Nevada, and Cascades, while the eastern half of the country is defined by much older, lower ranges.
After Oregon at 11,239 ft, elevations drop sharply—falling more than 2,400 ft to Texas and continuing downward across much of the central United States.
From there, the list tapers into the Appalachians and the interior East, where states like North Carolina, Tennessee, and New Hampshire still reach above 6,000 ft, but far below the tallest peaks in the Rockies, Cascades, Sierra Nevada, and Alaska Range.
At the other end of the spectrum, five states never reach 1,000 feet.
Florida ranks last at just 345 ft—meaning Alaska’s highest point is nearly 59 times taller. These low peaks are concentrated in flat, coastal regions, where elevation changes are minimal compared to the mountainous West.
Those states are mostly coastal and low-lying, which helps explain why their peaks sit far below the national median of states’ highest points of 4,588.5 ft.
In total, 37 states rise above 2,000 ft, and 22 exceed 5,000 ft, highlighting how much of the country still reaches significant elevation despite the dominance of the West.
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Fourteeners, the Highest Mountains of the U.S. on Voronoi.
2026-04-11 15:22:47
The animated map above uses data from various organizations to highlight interpretations of Eastern Europe’s geographical extent.
At a glance, the visualization shows a tight core centered on Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus, with boundaries stretching eastward into Russia and stopping along a debated western frontier that cuts through Central Europe.
Below are major groupings from the UN, CIA World Factbook, StAGN (Germany’s committee on geographical names), and The European Correspondent, the creator of the map.
| Country | UN (Regional) | UN (M49) | CIA World Factbook | Euro. Correspondent | StAGN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Belarus |
✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Russia |
✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Ukraine |
✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Moldova |
✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
Bulgaria |
✓ | ✓ | |||
Czechia |
✓ | ✓ | |||
Hungary |
✓ | ✓ | |||
Poland |
✓ | ✓ | |||
Romania |
✓ | ✓ | |||
Slovakia |
✓ | ✓ | |||
Estonia |
✓ | ✓ | |||
Latvia |
✓ | ✓ | |||
Lithuania |
✓ | ✓ | |||
Albania |
✓ | ✓ | |||
Azerbaijan |
✓ | ✓ | |||
Georgia |
✓ | ✓ | |||
Albania |
✓ | ||||
Bosnia & Herz. |
✓ | ||||
Croatia |
✓ | ||||
Montenegro |
✓ | ||||
N. Macedonia |
✓ | ||||
Serbia |
✓ | ||||
Slovenia |
✓ |
Unlike continents or countries, Eastern Europe is not a fixed geographic entity. Instead, its definition has evolved over time, shaped by empires, ideology, and institutions. According to various modern definitions, the region can include anywhere from a handful of countries to over a dozen.
Historically, the term gained prominence during the Cold War, when it often referred to Soviet-aligned nations. This political framing still influences perceptions today.
Despite disagreements, some countries are almost always included:
Russia
Ukraine
BelarusThese nations form the “core” of Eastern Europe across most academic and institutional definitions. Beyond them, the picture becomes less clear. Countries like Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic are sometimes included, but are often classified as Central Europe instead.
Research from institutions like the University of Basel highlights how these shifting classifications reflect cultural identity as much as geography.
At its maximum extent, Eastern Europe can span from Germany’s eastern border all the way to the Ural Mountains in Russia. This broader definition may include the Balkans and parts of Central Europe.
At its minimum, however, the region shrinks to just a few countries in Eastern Slavic territory. That these narrower definitions often reflect cultural or linguistic commonalities.
Ultimately, where Eastern Europe “begins” and “ends” depends on who you ask, which makes it less of a place on a map and more of an idea shaped by history and geopolitics.
2026-04-10 19:07:25
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Over the past 25 years, some countries have more than tripled their populations, while others have seen sharp declines that are reshaping their economies and societies.
This graphic uses IMF data to rank the 24 countries with the fastest population growth and decline since 2000, measured by total percentage change.
The Persian Gulf dominates the growth rankings—but not because of high birth rates.
Qatar leads the world with a staggering 423% population increase, growing from roughly 594,000 to 3.1 million. The UAE follows at 250%, while Bahrain (+154%), Kuwait (+139%), and Oman (+129%) also rank among the top 10.
The data table below shows the top 24 countries by population growth from 2000 to 2025:
| Rank | Country | Population Growth 2000–2025 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Qatar |
423.4% |
| 2 |
United Arab Emirates |
249.7% |
| 3 |
Equatorial Guinea |
166.6% |
| 4 |
Niger |
157.0% |
| 5 |
Bahrain |
153.9% |
| 6 |
Papua New Guinea |
149.6% |
| 7 |
Angola |
139.7% |
| 8 |
Kuwait |
139.1% |
| 9 |
Oman |
129.1% |
| 10 |
Chad |
126.9% |
| 11 |
Jordan |
126.3% |
| 12 |
Burundi |
123.6% |
| 13 |
Democratic Republic of the Congo |
121.8% |
| 14 |
Uganda |
120.1% |
| 15 |
Zambia |
119.5% |
| 16 |
Mali |
118.4% |
| 17 |
Yemen |
112.9% |
| 18 |
Gambia |
112.8% |
| 19 |
Madagascar |
108.7% |
| 20 |
Republic of Congo |
107.0% |
| 21 |
Benin |
106.6% |
| 22 |
Tanzania |
106.4% |
| 23 |
Mozambique |
102.3% |
| 24 |
Ivory Coast |
102.3% |
These surges are almost entirely driven by imported labor migration. Massive construction projects, oil and gas expansion, and broader economic diversification efforts drew millions of foreign workers to the region over the past two decades.
Outside the Gulf, the fastest-growing populations are concentrated in sub-Saharan Africa. Equatorial Guinea (+167%), Niger (+157%), and Papua New Guinea (+150%) round out the top five.
Angola (+140%), Chad (+127%), the Democratic Republic of the Congo (+122%), Burundi (+124%), Uganda (+120%), and Zambia (+120%) all more than doubled their populations. High fertility rates and gradually improving healthcare have sustained rapid growth across the region.
In contrast, much of Eastern Europe is experiencing sustained population decline. Bulgaria (-23%), Latvia (-22%), Moldova (-19%), and Lithuania (-18%) have all lost roughly a fifth or more of their populations since 2000.
Ukraine stands apart with the steepest decline at -33%, losing roughly 16 million people—from 48.7 million in 2000 to an estimated 32.9 million in 2025. Along with long-term economic factors, the war with Russia has accelerated Ukraine’s population decline.
The data table below shows the top 24 countries by population decline from 2000 to 2025:
| Rank | Country/Territory | Population Decline 2000–2025 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Ukraine |
-32.5% |
| 2 |
Marshall Islands |
-29.4% |
| 3 |
Bulgaria |
-23.2% |
| 4 |
Latvia |
-21.6% |
| 5 |
Moldova |
-18.8% |
| 6 |
Lithuania |
-17.5% |
| 7 |
Puerto Rico |
-16.7% |
| 8 |
Romania |
-16.1% |
| 9 |
Serbia |
-13.1% |
| 10 |
Albania |
-12.8% |
| 11 |
Croatia |
-12.0% |
| 12 |
Micronesia |
-11.2% |
| 13 |
Georgia |
-10.3% |
| 14 |
North Macedonia |
-10.0% |
| 15 |
Belarus |
-9.0% |
| 16 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
-8.2% |
| 17 |
Hungary |
-6.5% |
| 18 |
Palau |
-5.3% |
| 19 |
Poland |
-4.6% |
| 20 |
Greece |
-3.7% |
| 21 |
Armenia |
-3.3% |
| 22 |
Japan |
-2.8% |
| 23 |
Estonia |
-1.6% |
| 24 |
Russia |
-0.7% |
The pattern is consistent: after EU accession opened borders to higher-wage Western European economies, working-age emigration accelerated. This compounded an already-low birth rate across the region, creating a demographic squeeze that has left many of these countries with aging, shrinking populations.
Puerto Rico (-17%), Romania (-16%), and Serbia (-13%) follow a similar trajectory. Even larger countries like Poland (-5%) and Japan (-3%) saw population declines, though at more modest rates relative to their size. Russia rounds out the list, with its population falling by just under 1% since 2000.
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out The World’s Largest Countries by Population (2025) on Voronoi.
2026-04-10 13:13:50
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Since its launch in 1999, the euro has spread across much of Europe, becoming one of the world’s most widely used currencies.
This map highlights how the eurozone has expanded since its founding in 1999, utilizing official 2026 European Union statistics.
In January 2026, Bulgaria became the 21st eurozone member—marking the first expansion of the currency bloc since Croatia joined in 2023.
The eurozone was formed in 1999 by 12 founding members in Northern and Western Europe, including France, Germany, Italy, and Spain. Since then, nine more countries have joined, including most recently Croatia in 2023 and Bulgaria in 2026.
Per monetary agreements with the European Union, four European microstates can also use the euro despite not being eurozone members: Andorra, Monaco, San Marino, and Vatican City.
The following data table lists European countries alongside the year they began to use the euro.
| Country | Euro Adopted in Year |
|---|---|
Austria |
1999 |
Belgium |
1999 |
Finland |
1999 |
France |
1999 |
Germany |
1999 |
Ireland |
1999 |
Italy |
1999 |
Luxembourg |
1999 |
Netherlands |
1999 |
Portugal |
1999 |
Spain |
1999 |
Andorra |
1999 |
Monaco |
1999 |
San Marino |
1999 |
Vatican City |
1999 |
Greece |
2001 |
Kosovo |
2002 |
Montenegro |
2002 |
Slovenia |
2007 |
Cyprus |
2008 |
Malta |
2008 |
Slovakia |
2009 |
Estonia |
2011 |
Latvia |
2014 |
Lithuania |
2015 |
Croatia |
2023 |
Bulgaria |
2026 |
The eurozone is the largest currency union in the world, and has its monetary policy set by the European Central Bank, headquartered in Frankfurt, Germany. Currencies on other continents, such as the West African CFA franc, are pegged to the euro as a legacy of their historical relationship to the French franc.
In total, 21 of the European Union’s current 27 member countries have joined, including the bloc’s five largest economies and all of its founding members. The union famously came into crisis in the late 2000s and early 2010s as multiple eurozone members, including Italy, Greece, and Spain, suffered simultaneous financial crises.
All EU member countries are expected to adopt the euro upon reaching certain monetary criteria. The only exception to this rule is Denmark, which negotiated a permanent opt-out in the 1990s allowing it to legally avoid euro adoption as long as it wanted. Prior to leaving the EU in 2020, the United Kingdom had also obtained this opt-out.
Five EU countries—Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Sweden—still don’t use the euro, despite being expected to adopt it eventually.
However, progress has been uneven. Joining the euro requires meeting strict economic criteria, and participation in the ERM II system remains voluntary—slowing the path to adoption for several countries.
In addition to the 21 members of the eurozone and the four microstates with monetary agreements, there are two European countries which have unilaterally adopted the euro: Kosovo and Montenegro.
These two countries, which each broke away from Serbia in the 2000s, adopted the euro in 2002 after having previously used the German mark instead of the Yugoslav dinar. At the transition from the mark to the euro, both switched to the new currency, despite no authorization to do so by the European Union and subsequently no ability to mint their own banknotes.
The EU generally frowns upon this practice of non-EU countries adopting the euro unilaterally. In fact, EU officials have even indicated that unilateral euro adoption could jeopardize a country’s eventual accession to the European Union.
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out The $19 Trillion European Union Economy on Voronoi.Use This Visualization
2026-04-10 00:25:54
See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app.

See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
China is set to become the world’s dominant nuclear power producer.
Based on existing and planned projects, its total capacity could reach nearly 186 gigawatts, far surpassing the U.S., which currently leads globally. This shift reflects a broader push to secure reliable, low-carbon energy as electricity demand rises.
This chart ranks countries by current and prospective nuclear capacity, using data from Global Energy Monitor.
The U.S. currently leads nuclear energy production with a capacity of 102,475 megawatts, exceeding France by more than 35,000 MW.
China ranks third today at 60,898 MW, but that is set to change as new plants come online.
Dive into the data, which includes sites of any capacity as of September 2025, below:
| Country | Operating Nuclear Power (GW) | Prospective Nuclear Power (GW) | Total Future Nuclear Power (GW) |
|---|---|---|---|
China |
60.9 | 124.9 | 185.8 |
United States |
102.5 | 15.4 | 117.9 |
France |
65.7 | 9.9 | 75.6 |
Russia |
28.6 | 32.2 | 60.7 |
India |
8.2 | 31.5 | 39.7 |
South Korea |
27.1 | 5.6 | 32.7 |
Ukraine |
13.8 | 8.4 | 22.3 |
Japan |
13.3 | 6.6 | 19.8 |
Uganda |
0.0 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
Canada |
14.6 | 2.5 | 17.2 |
Poland |
0.0 | 15.6 | 15.6 |
United Kingdom |
6.5 | 8.9 | 15.4 |
Türkiye |
0.0 | 14.7 | 14.7 |
Czechia |
4.2 | 5.7 | 9.9 |
Kazakhstan |
0.0 | 9.6 | 9.6 |
Iran |
1.0 | 7.4 | 8.4 |
Spain |
7.4 | 0.0 | 7.4 |
Sweden |
7.2 | 0.0 | 7.2 |
United Arab Emirates |
5.7 | 0.0 | 5.7 |
Kenya |
0.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
This shift has major geopolitical implications. Countries that expand nuclear capacity can reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels while strengthening energy security and grid stability.
If all planned projects are completed, China will lead with 185,812 MW, followed by the U.S. at 117,910 MW and France at 75,590 MW.
France remains a historic leader in nuclear energy, with around 69% of its electricity generated from the technology.
The UK was home to the world’s first commercial nuclear power plant, which came online in 1956, but later scaled back its use of nuclear. The government is now aiming for a “golden age of nuclear,” though current commitments totaling 15,394 MW would rank the country just 12th globally.
Of the 17 countries with zero installed capacity today, Uganda is set to scale up the most to 18,000 MW, followed by Poland with 15,612 MW and Türkiye with 14,700 MW.
Today’s nuclear expansion is centered on fission, the technology that powers all existing reactors and accounts for about 10% of global electricity generation. While mature, it is evolving through smaller, modular designs that aim to reduce costs, improve safety, and speed up deployment.
This helps explain why much of the prospective capacity in the chart includes not only large-scale plants, but also a growing wave of smaller reactors backed by governments and private capital.
At the same time, nuclear fusion, the process that powers the sun, remains a long-term ambition. Despite rising investment and recent technical progress, it has yet to reach commercial scale.
For now, the global nuclear buildout is firmly rooted in fission, as countries prioritize reliable, low-carbon power that can be deployed within the next decade.
To learn more about nuclear, check out this graphic ranking the countries building the most reactors.