MoreRSS

site iconVisual CapitalistModify

By highlighting the bigger picture through data-driven visuals, we stay true to our mission to help cut through the clutter and simplify a complex world.
Please copy the RSS to your reader, or quickly subscribe to:

Inoreader Feedly Follow Feedbin Local Reader

Rss preview of Blog of Visual Capitalist

Ranked: Countries With the Most Years in Poor Health

2025-10-20 02:08:35

See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app.

This graphic ranks countries by the most years in poor health, defined as he gap between their average life expectancy and their health-adjusted life expectancy (HALE).

Use This Visualization

Ranked: Countries With the Most Years in Poor Health

See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Key Takeaways

  • When measuring the gap between average life expectancy and health-adjusted life expectancy (HALE), wealthy Gulf states dominate the worst performers.
  • On average, residents in Bahrain, Oman, Qatar, and the UAE all spend 16–17 years in poor health.
  • Another rich country, the U.S., ranks eighth by this metric, with Americans spending nearly 16 of their 80 expected years in poor health.

Many people are living longer—but not necessarily healthier—lives.

This visualization ranks countries by the number of years their citizens can expect to live in poor health, calculated as the gap between average life expectancy and health-adjusted life expectancy.

Skip to the second-last section for a full explanation of what health-adjusted life expectancy (HALE) is, and why it matters.

HALE data (for the year 2021) is sourced from the World Bank, via Our World in Data. Average life expectancy is from 2025 estimates UN World Population Prospects.

Together they reveal how disease, disability, and chronic conditions shape the quality—not just the quantity—of our lives.

ℹ Important information:
1. Poor health is defined as having a disabling illness or injury.
2. Life expectancy figures are for both sexes, measured at birth.
3. HALE data only updates every five years and 2021 is the most recent release.
4. While the comparison isn’t perfect, shows broader regional patterns in healthcare.
5. Due to missing data some countries may not be present in this ranking.

The Difference Between Living Longer and Living Healthier

Oil wealth appears genuinely toxic to health outcomes.

Nearly every Middle Eastern petrostate (Bahrain, Oman, Qatar, UAE, Kuwait) appears in this worst-performers list.

Bahrain (17.4 years), Oman (17.3), Qatar (16.5), and the UAE (15.9) all post sizable gaps despite having robust health-care budgets.

Rank Country Region Years in Poor Health HALE, 2021 Average Life Expectancy, 2025
1 🇧🇭 Bahrain Asia 17.4 64.2 81.6
2 🇴🇲 Oman Asia 17.3 63.2 80.5
3 🇸🇿 Eswatini Africa 16.9 47.5 64.4
4 🇶🇦 Qatar Asia 16.5 66.2 82.7
5 🇧🇼 Botswana Africa 16.3 53.1 69.4
6 🇦🇫 Afghanistan Asia 16.1 50.4 66.5
7 🇦🇪 UAE Asia 15.9 67.3 83.2
8 🇺🇸 U.S. Northern America 15.7 63.9 79.6
9 🇵🇪 Peru Southern America 15.1 63.0 78.1
10 🇱🇧 Lebanon Asia 14.9 63.2 78.1
11 🇳🇦 Namibia Africa 14.9 52.8 67.7
12 🇲🇻 Maldives Asia 14.8 66.7 81.5
13 🇧🇷 Brazil Southern America 14.4 61.8 76.2
14 🇮🇳 India Asia 14.4 58.1 72.5
15 🇲🇿 Mozambique Africa 14.3 49.7 64.0
16 🇮🇷 Iran Asia 14.1 64.0 78.1
17 🇲🇰 North Macedonia Europe 14.0 63.7 77.7
18 🇲🇽 Mexico Americas 14.0 61.4 75.4
19 🇫🇲 Micronesia Oceania 13.9 57.9 71.8
20 🇨🇱 Chile Southern America 13.8 67.7 81.5
21 🇨🇺 Cuba Americas 13.8 64.6 78.4
22 🇪🇷 Eritrea Africa 13.8 55.4 69.2
23 🇸🇰 Slovakia Europe 13.8 64.9 78.7
24 🇿🇦 South Africa Africa 13.7 52.8 66.5
25 🇿🇲 Zambia Africa 13.7 53.0 66.7
26 🇬🇷 Greece Europe 13.6 68.6 82.2
27 🇬🇹 Guatemala Americas 13.6 59.3 72.9
28 🇧🇬 Bulgaria Europe 13.6 62.4 76.0
29 🇸🇷 Suriname Southern America 13.6 60.3 73.9
30 🇦🇺 Australia Oceania 13.6 70.6 84.2
31 🇬🇾 Guyana Southern America 13.6 56.8 70.4
32 🇱🇸 Lesotho Africa 13.6 44.6 58.2
33 🇨🇷 Costa Rica Americas 13.6 67.6 81.2
34 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia Asia 13.6 65.6 79.2
35 🇫🇷 France Europe 13.5 70.1 83.6
36 🇺🇾 Uruguay Southern America 13.5 65.0 78.5
37 🇵🇱 Poland Europe 13.5 65.5 79.0
38 🇪🇨 Ecuador Southern America 13.5 64.3 77.8
39 🇨🇿 Czechia Europe 13.4 66.7 80.1
40 🇮🇹 Italy Europe 13.4 70.6 84.0
41 🇸🇧 Solomon Islands Oceania 13.4 57.4 70.8
42 🇧🇸 Bahamas Americas 13.4 61.5 74.9
43 🇲🇦 Morocco Africa 13.4 62.3 75.7
44 🇺🇦 Ukraine Europe 13.3 61.6 74.9
45 🇹🇳 Tunisia Africa 13.3 63.6 76.9
46 🇦🇱 Albania Europe 13.3 66.7 80.0
47 🇵🇷 Puerto Rico Americas 13.3 68.8 82.1
48 🇵🇦 Panama Americas 13.3 66.7 80.0
49 🇷🇸 Serbia Europe 13.2 63.9 77.1
50 🇵🇾 Paraguay Southern America 13.2 60.9 74.1
51 🇧🇦 Bosnia and Herzegovina Europe 13.2 65.0 78.2
52 🇵🇹 Portugal Europe 13.2 69.5 82.7
53 🇭🇳 Honduras Americas 13.2 60.0 73.2
54 🇰🇿 Kazakhstan Asia 13.1 61.6 74.7
55 🇾🇪 Yemen Asia 13.1 56.5 69.6
56 🇻🇺 Vanuatu Oceania 13.1 58.7 71.8
57 🇨🇦 Canada Northern America 13.1 69.8 82.9
58 🇨🇴 Colombia Southern America 13.1 65.0 78.1
59 🇲🇾 Malaysia Asia 13.1 63.9 77.0
60 🇨🇭 Switzerland Europe 13.1 71.1 84.2
61 🇰🇮 Kiribati Oceania 13.1 53.6 66.7
62 🇯🇴 Jordan Asia 13.0 65.1 78.1
63 🇲🇼 Malawi Africa 13.0 54.7 67.7
64 🇰🇼 Kuwait Asia 13.0 67.8 80.8
65 🇬🇧 UK Europe 13.0 68.6 81.6

The lifestyle changes that come with sudden wealth, like sedentary living, processed foods, air conditioning replacing physical activity, seem to create a specific pattern of prolonged morbidity.

The U.S. makes the top 10 as well, the only G7 economy to do. Americans are projected to spend 15.7 of 79.6 expected years in poor health.

Also worth noting is the average life expectancy at birth for all of these aforementioned countries is fairly high. Which means these countries are good at keeping people alive with advanced medical technology.

But they may be failing at keeping them healthy, as if they’ve optimized for extending life rather than living well.

ℹ Related: Qatar and the U.S. also make the list of countries with the highest obesity rates.

Life Expectancies in Low-Income Countries

Several sub-Saharan African nations, including Eswatini, Botswana, and Namibia, also record gaps above 14 years.

Unlike the richer Gulf countries, they face this burden alongside much shorter life expectancies, meaning fewer total healthy years.

Latin American countries such as Peru and Brazil post similar gaps, reflecting both higher infant mortalities and higher disease burdens.

These patterns highlight a central challenge for global health: boosting not only how long people live, but how long they live well.

What is HALE (Health-Adjusted Life Expectancy)?

HALE measures how many years a person can expect to live in good health, defined as free from disabling illness or injury.

HALE matters because it fundamentally reframes what we mean by a “successful” life and healthcare system.

Traditional life expectancy tells us how long people live, but HALE tells us how long they live well.

Those “unhealthy years” are extraordinarily expensive. The U.S. healthcare system’s poor HALE performance means they’re essentially running a massive, costly life-support operation for millions of people.

Countries with better HALE ratios spend less on healthcare while achieving better outcomes because they’re preventing problems rather than managing chronic decline.

ℹ The U.S. has the highest per capita health spending amongst similar high-income countries, with the lowest average life expectancy.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Highest and Lowest Life Expectancy Around the World on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.

Mapped: Greenest Cities in America in 2025

2025-10-19 22:41:24

See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app.

Map showing the greenest cities in the United States.

Use This Visualization

Mapped: Greenest Cities in America in 2025

See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Key Takeaways

  • WalletHub compared the 100 largest U.S. cities across 28 key “green” indicators, including air quality, commuting habits, renewable energy use, and green job opportunities.
  • San Jose, CA ranks #1 overall with a total score of 69.44, narrowly edging out Washington, DC (69.26).
  • With strong environmental policies, California leads with eight of the 20 greenest cities.
  • Minneapolis leads in sustainable transportation, supported by bike-friendly streets and walkable neighborhoods.

America’s greenest cities are becoming cleaner, more sustainable, and increasingly urbanized.

This map ranks the 100 largest U.S. cities by their environmental performance across four key categories: environment, transportation, energy sources, and lifestyle and policy. The data for this visualization comes from WalletHub.

California’s Dominance in Urban Sustainability

California continues to lead the way in green urban planning.

Eight of the top 20 cities in the 2025 ranking are in California, including San Jose (#1), Oakland (#3), Irvine (#4), and San Francisco (#5). These cities have implemented ambitious emissions goals, renewable energy programs, and infrastructure investments to reduce reliance on cars.

Ranked (1-100) City Environment Transportation Energy Sources Lifestyle & Policy
1 San Jose, CA 8 18 9 25
2 Washington, DC 14 7 13 8
3 Oakland, CA 15 25 8 6
4 Irvine, CA 4 41 1 11
5 San Francisco, CA 27 5 21 3
6 Honolulu, HI 2 10 32 17
7 San Diego, CA 9 84 10 12
8 Minneapolis, MN 25 1 31 4
9 Portland, OR 51 13 20 2
10 Seattle, WA 54 8 22 5
11 Fremont, CA 1 64 1 46
12 St. Paul, MN 12 12 28 38
13 Denver, CO 80 9 23 1
14 Sacramento, CA 49 35 18 13
15 Boston, MA 11 2 49 34
16 Madison, WI 6 4 56 31
17 Chula Vista, CA 35 94 11 24
18 Anaheim, CA 32 73 1 28
19 Buffalo, NY 47 3 50 16
20 Bakersfield, CA 72 29 1 27

Statewide, California is pushing toward carbon neutrality by 2045, aiming to cut emissions 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. It also plans for 100% zero-emission new car sales by 2035 and 100% clean electricity by 2045, with 60% renewable power by 2030.

Transportation Leaders in the Midwest

Minneapolis (#8) and St. Paul (#12) stand out for their transportation infrastructure. Minneapolis ranks first in the transportation category, supported by extensive bike lanes, pedestrian-friendly design, and efficient public transit options.

Washington, DC performs particularly well in lifestyle and policy measures, ranking 8th in that category. Honolulu (#6) and Portland (#9) also make the top 10.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Mapped: Where the Air Quality is Best in Each U.S. State on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.

From Harvard to Stanford: The Tuition Costs of the Top 10 Colleges

2025-10-19 20:18:13

See this visualization first on the Voronoi app.

This graphic compares the tuition cost for the top 10 U.S. universities with national averages for both private and public four-year colleges.

Use This Visualization

From Harvard to Stanford: The Tuition Costs of the Top 10 Colleges

This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Key Takeaways

  • Tuition alone at elite schools ranges from $59K to $71K, compared to $43K at the average private college.
  • The University of Chicago tops the list.

The cost of attending America’s most prestigious universities continues to soar. For the 2024–25 academic year, the total annual cost of the top 10 national universities now ranges from $77,500 to $98,300, according to data compiled from U.S. News & World Report and College Board.

In the graphic above, we compare tuition costs for the top 10 U.S. universities with national averages for both private and public four-year colleges.

Elite Education Comes at a Premium

The University of Chicago tops the list, with tuition reaching $71,300. Other elite schools like Duke, Yale, and Stanford also hover near the $70,000 mark. Even Harvard, despite having one of the largest endowments in the world, lists tuition at $59,300.

Rank Institution Tuition Total Cost
1 University of Chicago $71.3K $85.4K – $98.3K
2 Duke University $70.3K $92.8K – $94.2K
3 Yale University $69.9K $94.4K
4 Northwestern University $69.4K $77.5K – $96.2K
5 Stanford University $67.7K $96.5K
6 Johns Hopkins University $66.7K $77.7K – $92.8K
7 Princeton University $65.2K $90.7K
8 MIT $64.3K $89.3K
9 University of Pennsylvania $63.2K $78.7K – $95.6K
10 Harvard University $59.3K $90.4K – $95.4K
Private nonprofit 4-year $43.4K $62.6K
Public 4-year (out-of-state) $29.2K $49.1K
Public 4-year (in-state) $11.6K $29.9K

The Gap Between Elite and Average Colleges

Tuition at the top 10 U.S. universities ranges from $59,000 to $71,000 per year, averaging about 50% higher than the $43,400 charged by the typical private nonprofit four-year college. By comparison, public out-of-state universities average around $29,200, while in-state students pay just $11,600.

In fact, the average college tuition costs have climbed a remarkable 748% since 1963, after adjusting for inflation. This steady rise reflects expanding facilities, faculty salaries, and student services, but it also deepens accessibility challenges.

Fleeing Tuition Hikes

Facing soaring tuition costs, more American students are looking overseas for affordable alternatives.

According to the Institute of International Education’s Open Doors report, the number of Americans earning degrees abroad rose from about 50,000 in 2019 to over 90,000 in 2024.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

If you enjoyed today’s post, check out The Extra Earnings of a Bachelor’s Degree by State on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.

Mapped: How do Gun-Related Death Rates Vary by State?

2025-10-19 05:14:58

See this visualization first on the Voronoi app.

Choropleth map showing 2024 firearm death rates per 100,000 people by U.S. state, with Mississippi highest and Hawaii lowest

Mapped: How do Gun-Related Death Rates Vary by State?

This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

  • Mississippi has the highest gun death rate in the U.S. at 28.1 per 100K people—over 7 times higher than Hawaii’s.
  • The Southern and Western states dominate the upper end of the rankings, while the Northeast reports the lowest rates.
  • Gun violence rates often correlate with lax firearm laws, higher gun ownership, and socioeconomic disparities.

Gun violence remains one of the most persistent public health challenges in the United States. While the national conversation often focuses on federal policy, the reality on the ground varies dramatically by state.

The map above, created by USAFacts using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), shows the age-adjusted rate of firearm deaths per 100,000 residents in each U.S. state in 2024.

Here is a table of all 50 states and their firearm death rates:

Rank State Firearm Deaths per 100K People (Age Adjusted, 2024)
1 Mississippi 28.1
2 New Mexico 27.0
3 Alaska 24.8
4 Alabama 24.0
5 Wyoming 23.6
6 Louisiana 23.0
7 Arkansas 20.8
8 District of Columbia 20.4
9 Montana 20.3
10 Tennessee 20.2
11 South Carolina 19.9
12 Missouri 19.8
13 Oklahoma 19.4
14 Kentucky 18.8
15 Georgia 17.8
16 Nevada 17.7
17 Indiana 17.5
18 South Dakota 17.4
19 Arizona 17.3
20 North Carolina 16.7
21 Idaho 16.3
22 Colorado 15.6
23 Kansas 15.4
24 West Virginia 15.3
25 Ohio 14.8
26 Oregon 14.4
27 Texas 14.3
28 Utah 13.7
29 Florida 13.2
30 Virginia 12.9
31 Illinois 12.6
32 North Dakota 12.5
33 Wisconsin 12.2
34 Delaware 12.1
35 Michigan 12.1
36 Pennsylvania 12.1
37 Iowa 12.0
38 Maine 12.0
39 Maryland 11.8
40 Washington 11.3
41 Nebraska 11.1
42 Vermont 10.7
43 New Hampshire 10.3
44 Minnesota 9.9
45 California 7.1
46 Connecticut 5.9
47 Rhode Island 4.7
48 New York 4.4
49 New Jersey 4.1
50 Massachusetts 3.9
51 Hawaii 3.8

At a glance, we can see a wide spectrum—from just 3.8 deaths per 100,000 people in Hawaii to over 28 in Mississippi.

U.S. Gun Deaths: A National Crisis with Local Variations

Compared to other high-income nations, the U.S. gun death rate is exceptionally high. However, the disparity becomes even more striking when comparing individual states. Southern states like Mississippi, Louisiana, and Alabama lead the country in firearm mortality, with death rates often double or triple those in Northeastern states like Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York.

What Drives State-by-State Disparities?

The reasons behind these geographic differences are complex but generally revolve around three key factors:

  • Firearm legislation: States with stricter gun laws tend to have lower gun death rates. For example, Hawaii and Massachusetts have some of the strongest firearm restrictions and the lowest death rates.
  • Gun ownership: Higher rates of gun ownership are associated with more firearm-related deaths, whether by homicide or suicide.
  • Socioeconomic conditions: Poverty, lack of access to mental health care, and social instability all contribute to higher rates of gun violence.

The Role of Culture and History

In many parts of the U.S., particularly in the South and Mountain West, firearms are deeply embedded in the cultural fabric. Hunting, self-defense, and strong support for Second Amendment rights shape policy decisions and public sentiment, making any statewide gun control efforts politically challenging.

Meanwhile, urban areas in lower-death-rate states still face localized spikes in gun violence, often driven by factors such as gang activity. This underscores how state-level averages can mask important within-state variations.

Related reading: Mapped: U.S. States With the Most Guns

Learn More on the Voronoi App

Explore more data-rich visuals like this in our recommended post: 30 Years of Gun Manufacturing in America.

Visualized: The World’s Strongest Animals

2025-10-19 02:24:57

See this visualization first on the Voronoi app.

Graphic ranking the world's strongest animals

Use This Visualization

Visualized: The World’s Strongest Animals

This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Key Takeaways

  • The African bush elephant dominates in absolute strength, able to lift 13,000 pounds. An elephant trunk contains up to 40,000 muscles, compared to the entire human body which only has 600.
  • Large predators like tigers are also incredibly powerful, with the ability to lift several times more than their body weight.

The animal kingdom showcases some extraordinary examples of strength, with species evolving specialized muscles, body mechanics, and leverage to survive.

In this graphic, we ranked the world’s strongest animals based on the maximum weight they’re capable of lifting.

Data & Discussion

The data for this visualization comes from BBC Science Focus. The max lift (measured by bench press) of an average American male was included for context.

Animal Max Lift (lbs) Typical Body Weight (lbs)
👨 Avg. American male 135 200
🐆 Leopard 280 110
🐻‍❄️ Polar bear 1,000 1,075
🦁 Lion 1,000 425
🐻 Grizzly bear 1,100 525
🐅 Tiger 1,200 475
🐂 Musk ox 2,000 600
🦏 White rhino 1,800 4,750
🦍 Gorilla 1,800 400
🐘 African bush elephant 13,000 13,000

Elephants: Nature’s Powerhouse

The African bush elephant stands out in terms of absolute strength. Capable of lifting 13,000 pounds, the equivalent of a small school bus, it’s the most powerful land animal alive.

Elephant trunks can contain up to 40,000 muscles, which allows for both delicate tasks like picking up a single blade of grass and massive feats of strength like uprooting trees.

Elephants are also one of the world’s longest-living mammals, though their lifespans are shorter than humans.

Big Cats and Gorillas

Among carnivores, the tiger ranks as the most muscular predator. It has the ability to lift more than twice its body weight, and uses explosive movements for hunting prey.

Gorillas, despite being primarily herbivores, rival big cats in raw power. Their upper-body muscles allow them to lift over 1,800 pounds.

Compared to humans, gorillas have extremely dense muscle fibers as well as longer arms and thicker bones.

The Strongest in Relative Terms

While it can’t lift 1,000 pounds, the dung beetle is the world’s strongest creature when measured in relative terms.

Found in almost every region of the world, this feces-eating bug can push up to 40 pounds, equal to over 1,100 times its own body weight.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

If you enjoyed today’s post, check out The World’s Most Biodiverse Countries on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.

Ranked: The World’s Oldest People in History

2025-10-18 22:22:09

See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app.

graphic ranking the world's oldest people in history/ fetchpriority=

Use This Visualization

Ranked: The World’s Oldest People in History

See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Key Takeaways

  • The longest verified human lifespan belongs to Jeanne Calment of France, who lived 122 years and 164 days, significantly above the other records.
  • Women are the leaders when it comes to extreme longevity, with all 10 oldest recorded people being female, while men’s maximum verified lifespans are several years shorter.

Human longevity has fascinated scientists and historians for centuries. Across cultures and generations, certain individuals have lived well beyond the average human lifespan, offering insights into health, genetics, and lifestyle.

In this graphic, we visualize the world’s oldest people in history, highlighting extreme cases of longevity among men and women.

Data & Discussion

The data for this visualization comes from Wikipedia, which compiles verified records from official sources like the Gerontology Research Group or Guinness World Records.

The World’s Oldest Women in History

The world’s oldest women have all lived beyond 115 years, with Jeanne Calment of France reaching an incredible 122 years, 164 days.

Born in 1875, she witnessed the Eiffel Tower’s construction, both world wars, and the rise of modern technology. She attributed her longevity to a Mediterranean-style life: applying olive oil to her skin, enjoying chocolate and wine, and staying physically active.

Name Place of death
or residence
Birth date Death date Age (years, days)
Jeanne Calment 🇫🇷 France Feb. 21, 1875 Aug. 4, 1997 122 years, 164 days
Kane Tanaka 🇯🇵 Japan Jan. 2, 1903 Apr. 19, 2022 119 years, 107 days
Sarah Knauss 🇺🇸 United States Sep. 24, 1880 Dec. 30, 1999 119 years, 97 days
Lucile Randon 🇫🇷 France Feb. 11, 1904 Jan. 17, 2023 118 years, 340 days
Nabi Tajima 🇯🇵 Japan Aug. 4, 1900 Apr. 21, 2018 117 years, 260 days
Marie-Louise Meilleur 🇨🇦 Canada Aug. 29, 1880 Apr. 16, 1998 117 years, 230 days
Violet Brown 🇯🇲 Jamaica Mar. 10, 1900 Sep. 15, 2017 117 years, 189 days
Maria Branyas 🇪🇸 Spain Mar. 4, 1907 Aug. 19, 2024 117 years, 168 days
Emma Morano 🇮🇹 Italy Nov. 29, 1899 Apr. 15, 2017 117 years, 137 days
Chiyo Miyako 🇯🇵 Japan May. 2, 1901 Jul. 22, 2018 117 years, 81 days

Third in this ranking is Sarah Knauss, the oldest person ever from the United States. Prior to her death, there were six living generations within her family. Staff members at the nursing home Sarah lived in remembered her for her calm temperament.

The World’s Oldest Men in History

Jiroemon Kimura of Japan claims the title of the world’s oldest man, living 117 years, 54 days. He attributed his longevity to staying active and only eating until about 80% full (a Japanese concept known as hara hachi bunme).

Name Place of death
or residence
Birth date Death date Age
Jiroemon Kimura 🇯🇵 Japan Apr. 19, 1897 Jun. 12, 2013 116 years, 54 days
Christian Mortensen 🇺🇸 United States Aug. 16, 1882 Apr. 25, 1998 115 years, 252 days
Emiliano Mercado del Toro 🇵🇷 Puerto Rico Aug. 21, 1891 Jan. 24, 2007 115 years, 156 days
Juan Vicente Pérez 🇻🇪 Venezuela May. 27, 1909 Apr. 2, 2024 114 years, 311 days
Horacio Celi Mendoza 🇵🇪 Peru Jan. 3, 1897 Sep. 25, 2011 114 years, 265 days
Walter Breuning 🇺🇸 United States Sep. 21, 1896 Apr. 14, 2011 114 years, 205 days
Yukichi Chuganji 🇯🇵 Japan Mar. 23, 1889 Sep. 28, 2003 114 years, 189 days
Tomás Pinales Figuereo 🇩🇴 Dominican Republic Mar. 31, 1906 Sep. 24, 2020 114 years, 177 days
Joan Riudavets 🇪🇸 Spain Dec. 15, 1889 Mar. 5, 2004 114 years, 81 days
Fred Harold Hale 🇺🇸 United States Dec. 1, 1890 Nov. 19, 2004 113 years, 354 days

Why Do Women Live Longer Than Men?

Women typically live longer than men for a mix of biological and behavioral reasons.

For example, estrogen may offer cardiovascular protection, and women generally engage less in risky behaviors like heavy drinking or dangerous occupations.

Recent studies across mammal species also suggest that having two X chromosomes may provide females with greater resilience against harmful mutations, giving them a genetic edge in longevity.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Life Expectancy Around the World in 2025 on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.