MoreRSS

site iconTim FerrissModify

An early-stage technology investor/advisor (Uber, Facebook, Shopify, Duolingo, Alibaba, and 50+ others) and the author of five #1 New York Times and Wall Street Journal bestsellers.
Please copy the RSS to your reader, or quickly subscribe to:

Inoreader Feedly Follow Feedbin Local Reader

Rss preview of Blog of Tim Ferriss

The Tim Ferriss Show Transcripts: How to Use Ketosis for Enhanced Mood, Cognition, and Long-Term Brain Protection — A Practical and Tactical Guide with Dr. Dominic D’Agostino (Plus: Deconstructing Tim’s Latest Keto Experiment) (#845)

2026-01-08 14:21:01

Please enjoy this transcript of my interview with Dr. Dominic D’Agostino (@DominicDAgosti2), a tenured associate professor in the Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Physiology at the University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine and a Visiting Senior Research Scientist at the Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. His research focuses on the development and testing of nutritional strategies and metabolic-based therapies for neurological disorders, cancer, and human performance optimization.

Full bio

Products, resources, and people mentioned in the interview

Legal conditions/copyright information

How to Use Ketosis for Enhanced Mood, Cognition, and Long-Term Brain Protection — A Practical and Tactical Guide with Dr. Dominic D'Agostino (Plus: Deconstructing Tim’s Latest Keto Experiment)

Additional podcast platforms

Listen to this episode on Apple PodcastsSpotifyOvercastPodcast AddictPocket CastsCastboxAmazon MusicAudible, or on your favorite podcast platform.


Transcripts may contain a few typos. With many episodes lasting 2+ hours, it can be difficult to catch minor errors. Enjoy!


Tim Ferriss: Dom, happy holidays. Nice to see you.

Dominic D’Agostino: Great to see you, Tim. Thanks for connecting. 

Tim Ferriss: So I suggested — definitely — I suggested we hop on the phone because I have been harassing the living hell out of you with so many questions via text message. And I thought, this must be pretty annoying. So rather than answer me once, why don’t we hop on and record a bunch of the details because the details are so fascinating. And for people who are just tuning in who might not know the good doctor, D’Agostino, “Dom” Dominic, we should establish some basics. And I at this point have been quote-unquote in ketosis for 18 days now.

And we’ll dig into a lot of questions around that, tactical practical questions. But before we do, why would someone — and we can talk about what it is and so on, but first let’s just give some of the — let’s call it established benefits ideally in human studies, but could extend to animal models. And then, if there’s anything on the horizon, say in the next few years, because you’re at the cutting edge, if you think there’s anything that might plausibly be established as a benefit, what could that be?

So what would you put on the bullet list of benefits of intermittently or for extended periods of time, being in ketosis?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah, there are many benefits to being in ketosis and a ketogenic diet, if we’re going to go there, kind of has the benefits of fasting. And for millennia, we know the benefits of fasting, without the baggage, without the metabolic baggage. The muscle loss, the fatigue, obviously, you can’t live in that level of caloric deficit. But in regards to the practical applications of it, we know that being in a state of ketosis really quiets the mind. And I think that has major implications. And this was from centuries we knew this. And now over the past decades, this has been like a term kind of used.

And it’s backed up by experimental data to show that there’s an elevation of GABA. Obviously, it’s silencing a broad array of seizures independent of the etiology, temporal lobe seizures. Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, Dravet syndrome, rare forms of epilepsy. The ketogenic diet just quiets the brain, lowers glutamate, and elevates GABA, a brain stabilizing, calming neurotransmitter. And that’s why people gravitate towards alcohol, right? The GABA-ergic effects of alcohol and benzodiazepines.

So you can sort of, in a very gentle way, transition your physiology to a state of ketosis, which changes the neuropharmacology of your brain to sort of quiet it down. And that, I think, really echoes its broad application for metabolic psychiatry, which is everything from major depression to bipolar, to schizophrenia, to anxiety disorders, to anorexia nervosa. So that’s a very interesting and rapidly expanding application of ketosis that’s being funded largely by the Baszucki Group. 

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. Had David on. And on the physical side, some folks, if they’re old enough, may remember the Atkins diet. Not saying that is what we should hold up as the necessarily the end all be all of any sense, but why would someone go on this for benefits outside of the cognitive psychiatric? Are there any other benefits that you could list off?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah, I think first and foremost, it’s weight loss. So it’s very satisfying to go into a state of ketosis because you do see the scale change pretty dramatically, and that’s due in part to some fluid loss associated with a reduction of fluid volume. So it does have a diuretic effect. Ketosis does, ketogenic diets and obviously fasting, and also a natriuretic effect where you dump out some sodium. Your plasma volume, your blood volume will contract a little bit.

So if you have high blood pressure, that will likely go down. So if you’re on blood pressure medication, you have to think about that. But first and foremost, it’s an effective way to get your body to lower the hormone insulin, if you have insulin resistance, and shift your metabolism to burning fats. And as we burn more and more fat, that stimulates the production of ketones, ketogenesis. And ketones have a broad array of applications, metabolic signaling epigenetic that have real world applications.

And that’s why the whole field of exogenous ketones has developed and there’s 160 or more registered clinical trials on exogenous ketones, on clinicaltrials.gov. So yeah. And I could go into each of the applications individually if we want to go there.

Tim Ferriss: Well, as we talked about before recording, and I’ll have to act as a bit of a referee for my audience because I know you can go as deep as we want down the rabbit hole into the 17 dimensions of biochemistry. So if you get possessed by the organic chemistry demons and start speaking in tongues, I’ll reign you in a little bit. However, let me perhaps provide a personal example first for folks because some of this will be familiar to people who’ve listened for a long time, maybe to other episodes of the two of us.

But a lot of it’s going to be new. But I want to establish some priors just so people are aware of what this might look like in practice. So I have experimented with the ketogenic diet, also extended fasting, and you can arrive at some similar places, but like you said, Dom, there can be some pretty heavy taxes to pay with extended fasting. The ketogenic diet, I’ve experimented with all the way back to the ’90s. Some of you weren’t even born probably who are listening, but some of you will remember the ’90s.

And I was using it specifically for mood stabilizing. This was towards the end of college, but also to lean out while building muscle on something called the cyclical ketogenic or ketogenic diet. So we’re going to get to that later in the conversation, but it was effectively, let’s call it six days of focusing on a ketogenic diet with one day or a half to three quarters of a day of glycogen depletion and then, loading with more carbohydrates, lower fat, et cetera.

The reason that the ketogenic diet became doubly interesting to me is that when I had Lyme disease the second time, which came with all sorts of co-infections like babesiosis and so on. And this isn’t chronic fatigue or depression searching for a diagnosis that is external. I feel like sometimes the cottage industry of diagnosing and treating people for quote-unquote Lyme disease can be shady at best. But in this case, I’m coming from Long Island. Everybody in my family has had tickborne disease and was credibly diagnosed.

So the second time I had Lyme, I got to a point — because I did not see the bullseye rash, assumed I did not have it, which is a mistake because sometimes you don’t see the dermatological response and you nonetheless have contracted something like Lyme disease. I ended up weeks later slurring my speech, took me minutes to get out of bed because my joints hurt so much, forgetting friends’ names. And my assistant said, “Tim, you really need to see someone. This isn’t fatigue. I’ve seen you sick. I’ve seen you tired. This is something else.”

And suffice to say, that turned into several months, even post antibiotic treatment, which I do think is important, of we could call it pseudo dementia. I mean, I really felt like I was operating at 10 percent cognitive capacity. And basically at my wit’s end, I said, “Well, what can I control? Because a lot has not done the job.” And I went into strict ketosis. What does that mean? That means that I’m consuming moderate protein, probably getting at least 50 percent of my calories from fat and keeping my carbohydrates to less than 20 grams a day probably at that point.

And within three or four days, I’d probably say around day three or four, because I wasn’t very fat adapted at the time. My body wasn’t well-trained to use fat because I wasn’t doing intermittent fasting, which we’ll come back to. And within three or four days, effectively, all of my cognitive symptoms disappeared. And I stayed in that state through nutritional ketosis for a few weeks, had complete remission of any of the cognitive symptoms plus the joint pain symptoms, and those never came back.

And I recommended that, and this is not a randomized controlled trial, but over the years, as due to various factors, we’ve had ticks growing in population, also expanding to the coasts and on the West Coast that is, and elsewhere, had three friends replicate this with ketosis after suffering various symptoms from tickborne disease. And we were texting, maybe even talking about this, but I never had a great explanation for why it worked.

I said, “I don’t know the exact mechanism. Maybe I have faulty glucose metabolism that was somehow — maybe something was impaired by the ticks and therefore I’m giving my brain this alternate fuel that it really likes ketones,” but it didn’t explain, necessarily, the durability of the changes. In brief, do you have a theory or an explanation for why that would work?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. I’m glad you brought that up because quickly dozens, if not hundreds of people with tickborne diseases, including Lyme disease and all the tickborne diseases have communicated with me. And one of the patients is actually Deanna Tedone, who was diagnosed with ALS prior to 2010, and has basically been stabilized given three years to live. So I realized that it’s underdiagnosed, the tests to do that are kind of controversial with the CDC testing, the two-tiered testing, and IGeneX.

So I know I’m going off track a little bit here, but yes, I think it’s important to say that the spirochete, Borrelia, that spirochete is essentially 100 percent glycolytic. And when you limit glucose availability and glycolysis, you are targeting the energy systems of that microbe. So that’s one thing to think about. And it’s well established now. It wasn’t three years ago, but a ketogenic diet in particular, beta-hydroxybutyrate elevated in the blood, stimulates the adaptive immune response.

And that’s essentially your body’s ability to target foreign invaders and neutralize them. And that has become a rapidly growing area of interest. University of Pennsylvania, just — they’re doing CAR-T therapy and checkpoint inhibitors because of the ketogenic enhancement of the adaptive immune response. So I think that plays a role. And situationally, I have observed that you go into ketosis if you have an inflammatory process and Lyme disease is inflammatory.

But people who have shingles and herpes simplex and things like that, I have an inbox full of people that do that. And I would like to experimentally go down that direction to understand why. But I think there’s two reasons you’re targeting the energy systems and you’re augmenting the immune response to keep the spirochete in a dormant stage or maybe eradicating it in some context.

PREROLL?

Tim Ferriss: It’s really incredible on a whole lot of levels. And I’m just lucky that I had the prior experience with the ketogenic diet to even have it occur to me as a last ditch effort. And for people just to — if it wasn’t clear, I mean, you explained it clearly, but glycolytic, I’m simplifying here, but it means that something needs to eat sugar or metabolize carbohydrates to survive, right? And there are also, Dom, correct me if I’m wrong, but particular cancers that are very sensitive to being starved of glucose as well.

And for people who want more on sort of fasting ketosis as it relates to cancer, we may come back to it also, but we’ve had prior conversations about this and the benefits, some of the incredible effects of fasting prior to cancer treatments of various types.

PREROLL

So is it fair to say, do you think most of the benefits that someone would derive from fasting prior to cancer treatments, they could also get from ketosis or is it dialed back to a smaller percentage of effect?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah, that’s a good question. I think it requires a nuanced answer that we probably don’t have time for. But if you are overweight and your BMI, for example, is like — as many cancer patients tend to be like 28, 30, 32, a fasting or a calorically restricted ketogenic diet is the way to go. If a patient is trending towards being lighter, like a BMI, 20, 22, something like that, a eucaloric, meaning like keeping stable caloric level to maintain your weight is going to be important.

And then elevating beta-hydroxybutyrate will be important to get some of the anti-inflammatory effects and also the immune boosting effects and the neuroprotective effects going into cancer therapy because there’s people studying ketosis for chemo brain, like reversing chemo brain and like managing that. So it has a broad array of applications, not just targeting — it’s targeting the tumor growth and putting a break on it.

It’s not a cure for cancer, and I cringe when people talk about that like online, the ketogenic diet curing cancer, it does slow it down, especially if it’s highly glycolytic, which 80 percent of cancers are. And it enhances and augments the response to the standard of care that’s radiation, chemo and immune-based therapies. So we know that now.

Tim Ferriss: All right. Why have I been in ketosis for 18 days and why am I doing it a few times a year? Well, part of how I implement this does hinge and will continue to hinge on some of the answers in this conversation, because this is very self-interested. But what I have found is that for mood stabilization, and you mentioned metabolic psychiatry, and you made the introduction, I believe, Chris Palmer out of Harvard on the podcast to discuss this.

But there’s certain conditions, whether it’s depression, but even more squirrelly when you’re dealing with something like schizophrenia, for instance, or different types of bipolar, people who’ve been on dozens of medications who go into, let’s call it remission, or they no longer meet the criteria for the diagnosis of some of these things after being treated on a ketogenic diet, of one type or another.

It is astonishing. And so for my own mental health, I’ve noticed complete stabilization and without subduing the highs, right? I’ve never had mania necessarily, I’m not talking about that, but I’m not muted. I feel just calm, stable, sharp and that’s one reason in and of itself to do it for periods of time, but I seem to feel a carryover effect, also have Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases in my family.

I have three relatives with rapidly advancing Alzheimer’s at the moment. So maybe we could talk also to how these things might intersect. But my feeling is possibly, and I’d love your input here, if I follow a ketogenic diet for a number of weeks or maybe a month and a half or something like that, I’d love to know the timing you might recommend. Let’s say I do that two or three times a year, that there could be enduring effects that have sort of a protective carryover, right?

And I also find it much easier now that I started doing intermittent — I’ve been in intermittent fasting pretty much every day for the last six months, which means I’m eating between typically 2:00 p.m. and like 8:00 or 9:00 p.m. and having two meals a day, that’s it. Not hungry at all. I haven’t eaten today, it’s 12:30 my time, I will not be hungry for another two, two and a half hours. That by itself completely revolutionized. I mean, that’s an overused word, but completely polished my insulin sensitivity and metabolic health on a bunch of levels.

My labs have never been better. My oral glucose tolerance test has never been better. And one question I have for you, which is just for Timmy, Tim, Tim, but will apply to other people is, is there an argument to be made, and maybe I’m totally off base, but that if you follow a ketogenic diet and make it work for a multi-week period of time, that you’re changing your metabolic machinery or just your body in some way that has carryover effects, even after you stop the diet, or is that me just doing some hand wavy fancy footwork as a muggle? I don’t know if there’s a there, there, but what are your thoughts?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah, I would say absolutely. I think the science is still working to clarify that and make it less ambiguous, the benefits that we are deriving from that. But that is kind of like one of the pitches for the fasting mimicking diet by Dr. Valter Longo, who was one of our keynote speakers at Metabolic Health Summit, and he’s presented some really compelling research on that, that opened my eyes to that five days of fasting can have — I think he presented a time, even three months of effects on sort of cardiometabolic biomarkers. 

Tim Ferriss: And in his case, this would be the fast mimicking diet, so a few hundred calories a diet, of — yeah.

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah, like 600, using his protocol of various foods, kind of gravitating towards more of a plant-based lower protein strategy. And I think that it’s promoting metabolic flexibility and ramping up fatty acid oxidation enzymes. And much like muscle memory, I think there’s a metabolic memory. So the more you stay in ketosis, the easier it gets and the more benefits you derive from it and the more that you shift your body to being more fat adapted, just like you can build your VO2.

When you build your VO2 max or you build up to like a 400-pound bench press and you take like months off and you go back and you can only do like 225 for a couple reps, it only takes like two or three months to get back, but it took you 10 years to get there. That muscle memory snaps back quick and everybody agrees that there’s this metabolic memory and I think there’s a lot of things at play, including gene programs, epigenetic regulation that comes to play.

So first and foremost is changing our mitochondrial function and mitochondrial capacity. So the number of mitochondria increase, and then when you take a break and then stimulate, get that stimulation again, that mitochondria is kind of there and it responds very rapidly.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, thank you for that. And I mean, I want a bookmark, maybe we come back to this, but if people are trying to think about this, understanding that the science right now is maybe provisional or there’s a little bit, hypothesis worth disproving at this point, but that it seems to make sense from an evolutionary perspective that both muscle memory and metabolic memory would be a thing. Otherwise, it makes sense your body would want to adapt to be prepared for the next famine or whatever it might be, right? If there is a — 

Dominic D’Agostino: I just want to say muscle memory is metabolic memory. So someone — I gave the analogy of like lifting weights, but someone who runs marathons, it’s the same scenario. They take time off and then that VO2 max quickly establishes again and it’s muscle, but it’s metabolic. So I like to use the term metabolic memory.

Tim Ferriss: Metabolic memory. Okay. Yeah, metabolic memory. So just so people know where I am at the moment and actually, yeah, I’ll just tell people what I’m doing because I know they’re probably getting itchy for some just like, what does this look like in practice? And then, I want to talk a bit about how ketosis or the ketogenic diet may or may not be helpful for maybe not treating, maybe treating. I’ve certainly seen some interesting effects in some of my relatives when I give them exogenous ketones where suddenly their sentences are three or four times longer, 30 minutes later, which is wild to see.

But in terms of prevention or staving off the onset of some of these diseases, I’d love to hear your perspective. But let me tell people what I’ve been doing for the last few months, and especially in the last 18 days. So for the last whatever it is, I think I mentioned six months, I’ve been doing intermittent fasting. And that was after hearing a conversation between Dr. Rhonda Patrick, who I’m a big fan of, and Mark Mattson, M-A-T-T-S-O-N, who’s done a lot of research related to intermittent fasting.

And the key piece for me, because you see all of these different types of intermittent fasting, all of these different ways to do time restricted feeding, and I am going to paraphrase here. So Mark, I apologize if I’m getting this wrong or oversimplifying, but in effect, it’s important that you fast, this means no calories, or we could talk about pure fat, but let’s just assume you’re not consuming any calories for 16 hours because you want to deplete your liver of glycogen. And once you deplete your liver of glycogen, your body experiences this metabolic switching.

And I’ve certainly felt this just doing intermittent fasting where my meals contain carbohydrates later, that around the end of that fasting period, boom, something switches and my mind is sharper, right? And then when I got to the point of going into the ketogenic diet this time and also a few months ago, because I was doing the intermittent fasting, and it took me about a week and a half for my body to get comfortable with that, at which point it was no problem.

But I was a little pissy, a little irritable for a little while, a little foggy. And then when I went into the ketogenic diet this time, it was the easiest transition I’ve ever had. I did not have any fogginess, I did not have low energy, I did not have what some people might call the kind of keto flu adaptive period, which seems to be pretty remediated or addressed with electrolytes for a lot of people, but it was incredibly easy.

Just straight into the ketogenic diet with no problem because I was already doing the intermittent fasting. 

And then for 18 days, I’ve been having two meals a day and you’ve recommended a few that sound frankly pretty disgusting, but that are actually really easy, like two cans of canned mackerel with about two tablespoons, 30 milliliters of MCT oil plus apple cider vinegar with some salt and pepper. It’s actually delicious. I just love mackerel.

There it is. Yeah, you’ve got your apple cider vinegar right there.

Dominic D’Agostino: Cheap stuff you can get on Amazon. Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. For people who might think, “Oh, wow, this is what for fancy people who can do all sorts of expensive things in their diet,” we’re talking about like, how much does that meal cost, three bucks?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah, a dollar a can for that Chicken of the Sea. And literally you get almost a pound of mackerel, and this is like third-party tested very low chub mackerel, the little mackerel, less — 

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

Dominic D’Agostino: So yeah, you got like a $1.50 for almost a pound of mackerel that you can get that for. And the omega-3s are off the charts, the heavy metals are low. I consume pounds of this stuff and I’ve gotten my blood and my hair heavy metals tested and it’s like super low, like non-detected. So I wouldn’t worry about that. People have questions about cost and heavy metals and that’s a non-issue for me.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. And maybe you could mention, I’ll put links in the show notes as well, but since we’re on the topic, any brands that you default to, that you like. And that chub mackerel piece for folks, that detail is important because they’re a mackerel of many different sizes.

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. King mackerel is kind of high. This is Chicken of the Sea. So if you want to do the budget, you buy the case, the more you buy and then Amazon subscription and then, it goes on sale. You can actually get it for like less than a dollar a can. And I do the same with Chicken of the Sea jack mackerel or yeah, just chub mackerel or jack mackerel. So they’re both small fish. And I kind of like the King Oscar brand too.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

Dominic D’Agostino: That’s a little bit more pricey and Seasons brand is pretty good too, but I mean, it’s like as cheap as dog food. I mean, we buy some pretty fancy like freeze dry, we don’t buy the kibble stuff, but when you run the numbers and we buy — 

Tim Ferriss: It’s very inexpensive.

Dominic D’Agostino: Cases of eggs for like 120 per — if you do like eggs, fish, beef and also turkey, you can get turkeys for under a dollar a pound, the whole turkey.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, and just for people who are like, “Oh, my God, I can’t believe you guys are eating mackerel mixed with oil and vinegar in a dog bowl.” That’s not all you can eat. There’s more that you can eat. You can have, like, chicken with cheese on it. You can have vegetables. There are certain things you have to watch out for, so you’re not whacking yourself out of ketosis. But in my particular case, I don’t mind — and the fact of the matter is when I wrote The 4-Hour Body, people were like, “Oh, my God, you want us to repeat the same meals over and over again?”

I’m like, “What did you have for breakfast the last five days?” And they ate the same thing. You’re just swapping out to fall meals. So my first meal is something typically pretty small, like the macro I explained, and then I have a big meal. I might have some more protein in between, but it’s like yesterday I had lamb chops that were delicious with some vegetables made in an air fryer, no problem. And later on, I might have a rib eye on a big — chopped up on a big gigantic salad with some other stuff added to it.

But that’s about it. You have to be careful with the macadamia nuts. Those things will creep up on you. But that is in effect the diet, right? And I’m doing my training, I’m doing my rehab, I’m doing my zone two. I do find them a little, let’s say lower performance when I’m in ketosis, but what I wanted to talk about is maybe a false negative that I’ve experienced and I’ll explain what that is. So how do you know if you’re — and I keep putting this in quotation marks like quote unquote in ketosis, right?

Because most people are, or maybe all people are producing some level of ketones. So there are different concentrations that you can measure with a finger prick just like you would look at glucose. And at least with the finger prick, I think that’s measuring what you mentioned earlier as being so beneficial in a lot of studies, the beta-hydroxybutyrate, BHB. I also have — because I wanted to run this tracking, a G7 Dexcom continuous glucose monitor on one arm and then a SiBio.

Apologies if I’m not pronouncing that correctly, continuous ketone monitor on the other arm, and I’m wearing an Oura ring when I sleep to see how all of this affects my sleep architecture and everything else. 

So I’m gathering all of this, but then I noticed something really weird, which I’ve texted you about because I keep feeling like I’m failing at keto. I feel great. I feel sharp. And yet when I look at not just the continuous glucose monitor, but even with the finger prick, because you do have to often calibrate these things, right? Don’t assume that your continuous monitors are accurate. You want to calibrate them.

But I’m looking at the numbers. And for instance, my girlfriend freaked out the other night because my phone started screaming. I had earplugs in because I didn’t hear it. And it was critical medical alert or whatever the code red was because my glucose was 69, I suppose.

It’s gotten quite a bit lower on ketosis, but usually hovers somewhere between 65 and 80. And my ketones were 0.2 millimolars. Now, when we’ve talked in prior conversations about what kind of target you might aim for, it seems like between 1.2 and two millimolars is anxiolytic, lowers anxiety and then you’re looking for this ratio.

You could talk about this, but the GKI, there’s a ratio of glucose to ketones. And I look at those numbers and I’m like, “This makes no sense to me because I’m not getting enough glucose to function well.

And if I’m basing it off of the Keto-Mojo finger prick, even the Precision Xtra from Abbott or my continuous ketone monitor, I’m not getting any ketones either if you’re taking it at face value. So how am I functioning?

How would you answer that? Because I don’t think I’d be the only person who feels like they’re doing something wrong if they run into this, but how would you interpret this?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah, I would definitely say you’re running lean. And I think what you’ve done in your OGTT test is really good. I think you had messaged that.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, and the OGTT for folks is just that oral glucose tolerance test where you drink a bunch of dextrose water and then they take your blood every 30 minutes for two hours to see how you’re responding to it.

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. The biggest metabolic lever would be you have enhanced insulin sensitivity. And I think that has been the focus. For example, Ben Bikman wrote a book on this and doing hundreds of podcasts on insulin resistance, reversing insulin resistance and low carb ketogenic being effective for that.

So that, first and foremost, your insulin sensitivity is very high. Your fat oxidation is really high and your glucose disposal is high. And if you’re in a caloric deficit, your ketone uptake is very high. We see this quite convincingly.

In older rats where we gavage, where we tube feed the rats and they’re older, the ketones get to toxic levels. Whereas a younger metabolically fit rodent will dispose of it very quickly. Same with a couch potato human, same with an elite level athlete. So you have very rapid — 

So when you measure ketones in the blood, that’s a function of ketone production and ketone utilization. And you could have two to five times higher ketone utilization with high metabolic fitness. And that’s due in part to ketolytic enzymes, you up-regulate the MCT transporters, that could be two, or in rodents, two or three times higher.

I haven’t done that personally and we have some data in humans we haven’t published yet, but that is a real thing and I think that you’re experiencing. Also, if you’re in a caloric deficit, there’s less spillover. 

I just bought an antique motorcycle and it’s got a carburetor and the float sticks a little bit and it always drips out the carburetor when I’m running it. And when I stop and it’s pouring out the carburetor. So there’s spillover of fuel, right? But when I’m running it’s running lean because I’m using the fuel that’s going to the carburetor.

And the same analogy here is that if, for example, it might be good to just sit in one spot and relax and maybe eat a little bit of surplus calories or even eat a little bit of carbs. And what you’ll see often is your ketones spike up.

So I remember some of my highest ketone levels ever is when I consumed carbohydrates after I was fasting or in a state of ketone. It jumped up to five, six, seven, and I was like, “What is going on here?” But the glucose in that context is ketone sparing, but the glucose will also shut off ketogenesis so it’ll tank afterwards.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, afterwards. Yeah, okay. So it sounds like then because of probably the intermittent fasting in large part, I would think, if my insulin sensitivity is high enough, that can be paired with higher ketone utilization.

So if on the assembly line of my body, right, they’re producing 10 units of ketones. If I didn’t have good ketone utilization and it was my first rodeo with ketosis, let’s just say, or a ketogenic diet, the finger prick might pick up all 10 of those units.

I’m simplifying here, right? But if I have high ketone utilization and my body’s quickly using eight of those, especially in a caloric deficit, then it’s only measuring two and I’m getting the false negative that I’m not actually producing ketones in the first place.

Is that a fair, very, very simplified description?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. And you’re not measuring tissue levels of ketones, which we have done too, even in the brain, and that can shoot up really high. 

So that’s also, and I’ve done this with Peter Attia too, we were measuring blood and then breath, and it seems like when we were in a caloric deficit fasting, our ketones were really low in the blood.

Low is one to two, but we were really deep into fasting, whereas our breath ketones were maxing out the meters. So the breath ketones in this — we concluded that after a lot of testing that the breath ketones were almost a better indicator of ketosis, a more accurate, I guess you could say, in a caloric deficit.

Because when you’re in a caloric deficit, you just have very high ketone disposal uptake into the tissues.

Tim Ferriss: It looks like a breathalyzer, right? So is that measuring, what is it, acetoacetate? No, I’m just trying to repeat words that I’ve heard once or twice, but it’s not BHB.

Dominic D’Agostino: Acetone.

Tim Ferriss: Acetone. God dammit. All right. I know I was close. It was a 50/50.

Dominic D’Agostino: It comes from the spontaneous decarboxylation of acetoacetate. We’ll spit out about 20 percent of the acetoacetate will kick off to acetone and then you can measure it.

Tim Ferriss: I got it.

Dominic D’Agostino: We’ve measured blood levels of each, and it’s very tricky to do that, but we’ve done it in the lab.

Tim Ferriss: All right. Here’s another practical, tactical question for you because I’ve gone back and forth on this and Uncle ChatGPT has confused the shit out of me so maybe you can help resolve it. Gluconeogenesis and protein intake, right? So you consume, what is it, between 240 grams of protein a day, something like that? Is that roughly?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah, on active days. On less active days, if I’m just behind my computer all day, maybe closer to 180, 200, but yeah.

Tim Ferriss: And people might have picked up when Dom was casually throwing around like, “When you’ve been squatting 400 and you take a break and then you go back and you only can squat 300 pounds.” Dom’s a pretty big guy who’s also deadlifted 500 pounds for 10 reps before, after fasting for a week.

So he and I are not the same size, but nonetheless, I’m trying to figure out on one hand how much protein I can eat without my liver taking excess protein amino acids and turning it into glucose, right?

And depending on what I look at, and I have looked at sources outside of ChatGPT, on one hand, there are folks who say, “Don’t worry about it. If you’re consuming enough fat, you really don’t have to worry about it.”

And then there are other folks who are like, “Watch out, watch out. If you consume more than X number of grams at a given meal, you can very easily knock yourself out of ketosis,” which would, if that’s true, be maybe an alternate explanation for why I’m getting these low readings, if I’m having a small meal around 3:00 and then a gigantic meal later on.

How should I and how should listeners think about this?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. So if you were to consume protein in the form of liquid, for example, like whey or something like that, then the rapid entry of amino acids into your bloodstream from your small intestine will shut off ketosis.

So fat and fiber and salt, because your pyloric sphincter will basically be pretty tight until your — 

Tim Ferriss: Talking dirty, Dom.

Dominic D’Agostino: Pyloric sphincter is where your stomach connects to your small intestine, if you have a very fatty, salty, high fiber meal, that entryway, we call that the sphincter, it’s the pyloric sphincter, will remain shut until the contents of your stomach become isotonic.

Which means that your body has to give up water and it’s got to churn it and break it down. So you could delay gastric absorption simply with fat, fiber, and salt is pretty good too. You could do ketone salts or just salt electrolytes.

So that will delay the entry of amino acids or protein into the small intestine and thus amino acids into the bloodstream. And that’s the major regulator of ketosis having an impact on insulin and also having impact on gluconeogenesis to that rate of entry. And if you can slow that down, you see nothing on the CGM and your ketosis levels can basically stay.

You could further augment that by using MCT oil with the protein and the fiber. And so if you have long chain fats from a fatty steak and MCT oil and then fiber. And that could be insoluble fiber is pretty good to soluble and insoluble, that can slow the entry of amino acids and essentially buffer the gluconeogenic response.

Tim Ferriss: So let’s say I was stuck in San Francisco late. I’m just taking a rare trip over here, which is a pretty exciting time to be here with all of the mania with AI going on. But I mean, everyone’s kind of drunk on the Kool-Aid, but that’s a separate story.

I got trapped downtown because didn’t want to deal with traffic and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. So I ended up having a huge bunless double cheeseburger. Gigantic, this thing, I did not expect it to be as big as it was, right?

And so I go online to try to figure out what the protein content of this thing might be. And it’s 80 grams of protein, right? But plenty of fat, certainly. Tons of fat, salty AF, plenty of salt, right? Not a lot of fiber, we’ll give that one a pass. Should I be worried about something like that knocking me out of ketosis?

Dominic D’Agostino: I think you need to measure. So I’m default back to everybody’s a unique metabolic entity, but if you eat that and your activity level is high and you’re in a bit of a caloric deficit and you were to have that and not overdo it on the total calories.

I know my body. I know my body, I could stay in ketosis, but if you have that oversatiated feeling — so we have neurons, we have neuronal pathways to and from the liver and to and from the gut. We call that afferent and efferent signaling in the enteric nervous system.

And a big meal will basically tell your brain that you had a big meal. And independent, I talked about the amino acids going into the bloodstream kicking you out of ketosis. But there’s also this, when you have stretch receptors and you have the big full meal in your gut, then that could actually tell your brain to activate the sympathetic nervous system.

And then that, by virtue of spilling out catecholamines can basically, we’re talking adrenaline, epinephrine, things like that, that can further augment and enhance gluconeogenesis.

Tim Ferriss: Okay. Let me just translate that for a second. So people wake up. Cortisol has developed this bad reputation among a lot of online influencers, but you really need cortisol, right? So when you wake up in the morning and you see a bit of a glucose spike, it’s actually important to get your ass up and moving.

If you’re in ketosis, it’s a different thing, right? So if I’m hearing you correctly, outside of how people think about digestion, blood sugar, insulin, et cetera, that just based on stretching your stomach, et cetera, with these mechanoreceptors, taking the inputs, that that signals to the brain, it’s go time.

So let’s basically get things moving with these hormones and that could in and of itself then trigger the liver to produce more glucose or liberate more glycogen, I guess.

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. It can. It’s above and beyond what you normally eat. If you train your body to that size meal, but it also activates other gut hormones like cholecystokinin, that’s called CCK, and other things that can then activate the parasympathetic nervous system that comes in a little bit after.

At the same time, it bifurcates, but then the parasympathetic nervous system is relax, digest, rest and relax, digest. So that comes in after. So you might see a blip and make you feel stimulated.

Also, all the salt, if it’s a salty meal, it’s going to expand your plasma volume. Your blood volume will increase and that can increase your blood pressure a little bit and that can activate your sympathetic nervous system.

So it’s always good to go take a walk after a big meal. 

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. I do that.

Dominic D’Agostino: Not like a strenuous — not like go squat and deadlift, but just yeah. Even a 10, 15, ideally a 20-minute brisk walk is really good after a big meal.

Tim Ferriss: Yep. Now let me ask you this on the walk timing. So when I have a big meal, and I will say, I think I have trained my body to have big meals. What the exact response is, I can only give you subjectively what I feel and I can give you what the monitors show, right? But I typically feel pretty good.

However, if I have a big meal, whether this is in ketosis or otherwise, I don’t see the biggest spike until something like, depends on the meal, right? But 60 to 90 minutes later, that’s when I see the spike. So should I do the walk at 60 to 90 minutes, or should I do the walk right after the meal? When should I actually time the walk?

Dominic D’Agostino: So you eat a meal, you go walk, and then you see the rise 60 to 90 minutes after, or is that independent of the walk?

Tim Ferriss: Independent of the walk. Yeah.

Dominic D’Agostino: Okay. So you’re not walking, but you see the rise 60 to 90 minutes later. So I’m saying that you might not see that rise 60 or 90 minutes later because — 

Tim Ferriss: If you did it right after the meal?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah, just because a little bit goes a long way. So just like walking, actually doing some stretching and walking too, it activates the glucose four, the GLUT4 transporters. So that’s an insulin independent. So less insulin is dumped, greater glucose uptake.

And you’re also using the sympathetic nervous system mobilization of glucose through gluconeogenesis during that walk. So it then attenuates the buffering of ketogenesis, and a very short walk can go a long way.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. Okay, cool. Is it GLUT4? GLUT4? How do you pronounce that? I don’t know. How do people say that?

Dominic D’Agostino: I say GLUT. I say GLUT4.

Tim Ferriss: Okay. All right, GLUT4.

Dominic D’Agostino: People say GLUT. Yeah, yeah.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. For the OGs in the audience, go back and look for GLUT4 in The 4-Hour Body. It’s in there.

So the other measurement question I want to ask you about, which is these continuous glucose and ketone monitors are not designed for someone like me, right? They’re developed presumably, I don’t know about the keto monitor, but in the case of glucose to help people with serious conditions not end up in very serious situations, right?

So when I am looking at my ketone levels, like right now I feel very sharp. I had some KetoStart, you know this well. Exogenous ketone salt-based product not too long ago, just in hot water with a little bit of MCT oil. This was, I guess, an hour, hour and a half ago, but I’m at 0.4 millimolars.

And I guess what I’m saying is whether I have a huge meal or I’m fasting as I am right now, my range is basically 0.1 to 0.4 95 percent of the time. There are a few outlier cases. If I’m just doing a YOLO, as many grams as possible exogenous ketone party, then maybe I can goose it, but we can talk about this.

Once it gets past a certain point, then I might spike insulin and have a subsequent crash. But I guess what I’m trying to say in brief is my range for the most part is 0.1 to 0.4, regardless of whether I’m fasting or eating a gigantic double cheeseburger. So I’m not really sure how to determine what effect it’s having.

I can watch the glucose, but right now I’m 0.4 millimolars of concentration on the SciBio. And as we’ve talked about, maybe the Precision Xtra would give me an extra 0.1 or 0.2, but they’ve been pretty close so far.

And then ever since my cheat meal, we had this experiment, right? I wanted to see if I did a workout and then had one or two cheat meals last Saturday. It is now Thursday, but my glucose right now is 103, right, which is higher than the week prior, but it goes around. It moves around, right? Last night it was probably 70 something.

Do you have any suggestions for how to read the tea leaves or is it mostly just subjective feel? I mean, still thinking about the size of the meal, right? But I guess what I’m saying is, if my device is telling me as it is right now, 0.4, fat not burning. You’re almost not burning fat at the moment, not in ketone. It’s very chastising.

So if I’m to believe this by the letter of the law on the screen, I’m failing at ketosis, right? Any thoughts on how to read the tea leaves here?

Dominic D’Agostino: Well, I would ignore that. I think that’s an app in the process of being developed, the fat — 

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

Dominic D’Agostino: You would need whole body metabolomics to really answer that question if you’re in fat burning or do metabolic cart and look at respiratory quotient or whatever. But subjectively, if you feel good — 

We have seen an athlete, especially more advanced athletes that, and we do a very strict, strict keto macros and everything that basically with a bunch of athletes with 0.8 is about as high as we get, and that’s the average across.

Sometimes you get guys 2.5, 2.6 every day. And the same guy with the same essentially metabolic phenotype will be running 0.4 or 0.3. He could potentially just have greater ketone utilization. So I think it would be important to measure your blood. So a continuous ketone monitor measures interstitial — that can be different. The SciBio, I think it’s a great device. It’s very versatile. I can jump in and out of salt water. The thing stays on me. It’s almost more reliable than a CGM. But I did notice, and I’ve probably used about 50 of these devices that the first week, is pretty accurate and then it tapers off, the sensitivity.

And this is a known limitation of the technology is that essentially the enzyme-based sensor system tends to just — and you could get around that conceivably just by having the ability in the app to calibrate it.

So if you were to measure it and the continuous ketone monitor is measuring 1.0, but your blood ketones is 2.0 that you should be able to calibrate it like you can with a Dexcom. So they acknowledged that at the company and they said, “Yes, we realize that that would fix the problem,” but that’s not a feature of the app yet.

Tim Ferriss: They do have in events, they have blood ketone on the bottom right. I just don’t know if it actually calibrates it. It may just record the blood ketone at this point.

Dominic D’Agostino: It does not have the ability to calibrate it to my knowledge. 

Tim Ferriss: I inputted one measurement on the Keto-Mojo and it didn’t seem to change it, right? The number stayed the same. So I think it’s just logging it because you can do that with a glucometer.

Dominic D’Agostino: Well, you can do it with Dexcom, but not Abbott.

Tim Ferriss: Dexcom. Okay.

Dominic D’Agostino: That’s a problem with the Abbott FreeStyle too. And that’s the feedback I gave them because I put these devices on, it’s reading me 130, but I measure I’m like 80, literally 50. Because — 

Tim Ferriss: Wow.

Dominic D’Agostino: — if you are lean and it’s stuck in your muscle instead of your adipose tissue, the glucose levels are going to be higher, especially when — 

Tim Ferriss: Wow.

Dominic D’Agostino: — you work out and stuff. So I’ve noticed this and that’s for me, so that’s why the Dexcom is very nice because I can calibrate it too, and I consistently show that. And that was a major issue I had.

Tim Ferriss: Let me hop in also and just tell folks this is not going to be very quantifiable, but for what it’s worth. Part of my reason I avoided intermittent fasting for so long is that I thought I would not be able to get sufficient protein or caloric intake and that I would lose a bunch of muscle mass.

I was dead wrong about that. I was very, very wrong. If anything, it seems to have enhanced my ability to put on muscle per calorie or per gram of protein ingested. And so I admit I was totally wrong about that.

Furthermore, on this ketogenic diet where I’ve historically found it pretty hard to put on muscle or — I mean, I shouldn’t say keep muscle because I’m only doing it for a few weeks, but I have been astonished by having one small meal. I’ll have some oxtail soup after this with some veggies and obviously oxtail. It’s a whole separate story.

And then I’ll go out and have another meal probably in three or four hours, which will be a much bigger meal. And just with that, and I am watching some of the grams of protein intake and so on, but I have not, looking in the mirror and looking at the weights that I’m putting up in the gym, I don’t feel like I have lost any muscle and I feel like I have leaned out.

Some of that’s losing fluid, but I’ve been really impressed with how little relative to what I used to do in college, taking weight gainers and just all this garbage, how little it actually takes to at least maintain muscle mass.

But I do have a question for you, which I’ve never really been able to answer to my satisfaction, and it relates to rabbit starvation. So for people who don’t know what that is, you could probably give a better description, but if you’ve ever watched the show Alone, Alone is probably the only reality TV show that I love to watch.

seasons six and seven in particular are outstanding for folks. But what you’ll notice is that if people are trying to survive in the wilderness to outlast everyone else, that’s what the show is. You get to pick a handful of items, you get dropped off, you don’t get to choose where you’re dropped, and then you just need to survive for as long as possible.

Sometimes it’s 100 days, sometimes it’s last man or woman standing. If somebody is only eating lean protein like rabbits, they will waste away. They will not last. They will have to get yanked out for medical reasons, and that might seem strange to people.

My question though is on a ketogenic diet specifically, can you just consume leaner protein and then rely on body fat for the fat? And some people are like, “Yeah, everybody knows that doesn’t work.” But I really want to understand why that’s the case, right?

Because I understand dietary fat dampens insulin response, right? Or at least that’s my understanding. Maybe there’s a rate limiting step in how much body fat you can break down and use, right? And who knows if that’s mediated by the kidneys or who the hell, liver, I don’t know, right?

I guess it would probably be liver, but I’d love to hear your take on it, right? Because certainly in the past, I and lots of people reading The 4-Hour Body have been able to lose more body fat than they are told they are capable of losing, as measured through DEXA scans and other things.

Can you do a moderate fat or low fat protein-based keto diet if your goal in part is to lose body fat, or does that backfire?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah, just not indefinitely. So when I did the ketogenic diet for a year, I was cruising at about 300 to 320 grams of fat, sometimes 350 grams of fat per day. And then just experimenting, I would throw in a two days per week of protein veggies with about 50 to 100 grams of fat.

And in those days of dropping to 300 plus grams of fat to 50 to 100 grams of fat, after two days, I swore I lost two percent body fat and I would just transition back. So I would just periodically throw in protein veggie days. I would cruise on keto and then periodically titrate in the protein veggie days to assist body composition alterations.

So if I kept that going, I could get pretty dramatic, almost scary lean to where it happened very fast. It’s almost keto trains your fat metabolism and then if you just start titrating in, it’s just pulling fat out.

And I think my body really liked throwing in the veggies with the fiber seemed to help with the gut health and I would do that twice a week and it’s pretty dramatic. 

Tim Ferriss: Why not do it seven days a week? What happens when you try to do it for more?

Dominic D’Agostino: If the idea is to stay in ketosis, it was really hard for me to stay in ketosis if I do protein veggies. After two days, I would be out, but my metabolism would be cranking.

Tim Ferriss: Mechanistically, why is that the case? Why doesn’t your body just break down more body fat?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah, because, well, it’s taking body fat exogenously and endogenously and I think the more fat going to the liver and the more fat that’s in circulation, it gets shuttled to the liver and then that’s stimulating beta oxidation in the liver. You just have a greater fat pool.

But actually, I think, the day that I would do protein veggie days and then the day I would jump back into ketosis, I would see this big ramp up in ketones that day. Whereas if I did like a cheat day and just ate a lot of carbohydrates, it took me two or three days to get back into ketosis.

But if I just did like protein and veggies and cruised back into ketosis, then I would rapidly get back into ketosis and just give my body a break from the fat. But I think just that short amount of time really stimulates mobilization of fat from your body because your body is used to getting it exogenously, and then you’re pulling more fat off.

But yeah, I think on the protein veggie days, I’m getting higher amounts of calories from protein. So that has a bit of an anti-ketogenic effect. And then shifting back into ketosis on that third day, I always had probably the best ketone numbers for the week.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. I don’t want to beat this dead horse too long, but I’d love to just hear you riff on this a little bit more because I guess in my mind I’m thinking, well, on your protein veggie-only days, if you’re getting enough protein, not enough protein to satisfy all of your resting metabolic rate, like you’re hypocaloric, but you’re getting enough protein to not lose muscle, why wouldn’t the body just break down the fat that it needs to continue producing ketones, right?

So I’m trying to avoid the gluconeogenesis problem where you’re having like 200 grams at a meal with no fat to offset it, but if you’re having smaller amounts that are slowly digested, but it’s just enough to keep you from losing muscle mass, maybe you’re doing some weight training to help with that or whatever, then I guess what I’m trying to figure out is why the dietary fat is so important? Because I think of the body, right? It’s like each pound of stored body fat is what?

Dominic D’Agostino: 3,600.

Tim Ferriss: All right. So 3,600 calories, that’s a decent amount of calories, right? And for somebody who’s, let’s just say you’re 150 pounds, 10 percent body fat, okay, you got 15 times 3,600, you got plenty of body fat to go around.

So it would seem to be enough to do a few weeks of ketosis that is low fat, higher protein, but not enough protein to necessarily be hammering your liver with gluconeogenesis if you’re dividing it up, slowly digested protein. Some people are going to be really annoyed with me dragging this out so long, but why is dietary fat so important?

Dominic D’Agostino: Because I mean, that’s the fuel that you are using, you coax your body into using. And I should probably add a little bit of context to my protein veggie days. So I would go from like 125 grams of protein to like 300 grams of protein.

Tim Ferriss: Right, right.

Dominic D’Agostino: That’s a pretty big bolus of protein.

Tim Ferriss: That’s a lot, yeah.

Dominic D’Agostino: And if one was to go a hundred grams of protein or whatever, and then bump it up to like 170 or 200 or something, they may not kick out of ketosis. But I remember just lower ketones, but not out of — I was still in ketosis, but typically how I think I did it like my protein veggie days were following like a heavy deadlift or squat workout.

So the thinking was that I’m recovering for those two days and the extra amino acids and proteins and mTOR activation is sort of assisting in recovery and regeneration and skeletal muscle protein synthesis. And then I would kind of go back. I calculated it in that way. So yeah, I like double the protein on the protein veggie days, but my calories were about the same or maybe a little bit lower.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. I need a SiBio if you’re listening, please allow me to calibrate this with a finger prick because I need a little more range. I need a little more range than 0.01 to 0.04 for me to be able to read this type of thing effectively, right? Because technically, if I’m reading this as it is, I’m never in ketosis. I shouldn’t say never, that’s not true. But in any case, it would not be nice to be able to calibrate.

Let’s come back to something I promised that I would ask about, which is neurodegenerative disease, Alzheimer’s, et cetera. Could the ketogenic diet benefit people with these conditions? And just as important, certainly for me personally, could this, is it plausible that there’s a mechanism by which the ketogenic diet regularly done could help delay the onset of any of these diseases? Or am I just Pollyanna hoping for a pie in the sky?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. I think that’s a question we don’t have an unambiguous answer to, but I think all the science points into the direction that if you improve upon and optimize your cardiometabolic — I like to say cardioimmunometabolic biomarkers, instead of cardiometabolic biomarkers because if you can lower, for example, your insulin and keep that between two to six, and if you lower your hsCRP below 0.6 and then optimize your hemoglobin A1C or glucose. And I think also, and I’ve talked about this with Rhonda Patrick and other people, too, that if you measure your omega-3 fatty acids and look at your omega-3 to 6 ratio, I think that’s going to be a biomarker that’s probably going to end up in standard blood work because it’s so compelling, the data behind it.

And you also measure your B12, too. I think that’s important. People coming into the Alzheimer’s center that can present as flat-out Alzheimer’s disease and then you correct their B12, a B12 deficiency will cause brain atrophy, and that could be reverse with B12.

So the things that if you’re following ketone metabolic therapy, it’s impacting the things that we know are driving age-related chronic diseases, and then obviously one of them is Alzheimer’s. So the level of inflammation, hsCRP now is probably more atherogenic than LDL. There’s probably people selling statins that don’t want to hear that, but we know that the data is emerging on that now. So lower insulin, lower inflammation — 

Tim Ferriss: And that’s an inflammatory marker, right? The C-reactive protein. What does the HS stand for or what is that?

Dominic D’Agostino: High-sensitivity C-reactive protein.

Tim Ferriss: High-sensitivity.

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. So it measures in that lower range. And I used to trend to like two to two to three, like my early CRP, hsCRP when I was like on a high carb, I only had it measured twice when I was on like a high-carb diet, but since I’ve been keto, it’s like either non-detectable or like 0.2. Or when I did extreme environment research on myself, then I could bump it up a little bit. And when I had a bacterial or viral gastroenteritis, it shot through the roof because it activated your immune system. But generally that hsCRP is a big driver.

I used to laugh at it and be like, “Ah, it’s this nonsensitive thing.” But now like all the data is pointing to the direction that we need to add that to that.

And your omega-3 status, your B12, make sure you don’t have any deficiencies because that could lead to sort of rapid progression to Alzheimer’s disease, your magnesium levels.

But also just in general like exercise, the biggest metabolic lever and your body weight, body composition.

Get DEXA scans. I know it might be good for you to do a DEXA scan with your keto experiments, too. So I was doing once a year, but now I end up doing like three or four times a year because I do these mini experiments to see how acutely some of the things are impacting my body composition because I just get antsy for like an answer to that.

But it’s a long-winded explanation to just basically say that your metabolic health is tightly linked to your brain health and can dramatically delay the onset of Alzheimer’s disease. Not that you’re going to get it or reverse it altogether before something else gets you in the end. Yep.

Tim Ferriss: Well, I mean, the metabolic health piece, just to underscore that, I mean, one of my relatives in question, APOE 3/3, I understand that’s not the only risk factor, but there’s something just seemed to be missing because the decline was so precipitous. It didn’t map to any patient data or clinical data that a number of doctors, who are also researchers I was working with, had seen. Also because this person, this relative had been assessed four or five years prior and did not show any indication of predisposition to a rapid decline.

And I’m APOE 3/4, again, recognizing there are other factors at play, but when she just kind of disintegrated, there are a few things that came to light. Number one is her local GP had basically missed severe metabolic dysfunction for years. And I can’t remember the reference range, but like insulin, let’s call it upper bound of 12. I’m making this up, but you’ll get the idea. And she was like 43, right? It was just absolutely atrocious.

Dominic D’Agostino: And her body weight and just general composition?

Tim Ferriss: I mean, poor body composition. Yeah. Poor body composition, very little exercise despite my best efforts, misbehaves horribly, dietarily, not morbidly obese, but certainly — 

Dominic D’Agostino: Smoking, alcohol, other drugs?

Tim Ferriss: No smoking or alcohol.

But here’s the other piece that, so she had been diagnosed with stage one breast cancer, had a lumpectomy, was removed, late 70s was put on an estrogen, I think it’s an estrogen blocker called letrozole.

And I looked at this and I spoke to a friend of mine who was a radio-oncologist and she said it is very poorly tolerated by most women from a cognitive perspective, like they get smashed by and large. 

Dominic D’Agostino: Guys, too, by the way. Guys who take — 

Tim Ferriss: Okay. Yeah, guys do.

Dominic D’Agostino: — aromatase inhibitors, yeah, for like TRT and things like that. It’s not a good thing to do.

Tim Ferriss: Yep, yeah. So I was looking at it and I mean, it’s upsetting that I’m the one who has to kind of find these things, but it’s like, okay, well, we think about the oncologist’s role. It’s to prevent my mom from dying of cancer. That’s the directive, right? But if she were 30 and had later stage cancer that was really aggressive, it’s one thing, but she’s late 70s, stage one, all cancer removed, and so got her off of the letrozole with the cooperation and after discussions with doctors and almost saw an immediate turnaround within a handful of weeks after the washout period and everything.

But it seems to, I mean, look, I’m not an MD. I don’t play one on the internet, but it seems to have done some real damage. I mean, there’s the metabolic piece that is very non-trivial, but the acceleration of decline was just so absurd over the course of a handful of months, terrifying to see.

But I guess I’m laying this all in, not necessarily to explore this particular case because I’ve got a lot of people on it for all of my relatives, but it’s just to say that my — like I am not going quietly into the night with something like Alzheimer’s, right? And so what I’m trying to figure out for myself, I’d be curious to hear your perspective.

I will be honest, I find keto pretty goddamn boring. I don’t find it to be the most diverse diet in the world. I don’t really want to do it all year round. I also have some maybe compromising cardiac elements. I’m a cholesterol hyper-absorber, so I do use — again, guys, talk to your doc. Don’t just copy me, but it’s like I’m using Repatha, taking ezetimibe. I have been also taking Nexlizet, but that might end up being redundant, the bempedoic acid with the Repatha.

That is a long way of saying I’ve got to keep an eye on the heart stuff because neurodegenerative disease and cardiovascular disease is what kills everybody in my family. So for a lot of reasons, I don’t want to do keto all year, but I’m trying to figure out what is the sort of minimal effective dose that — and I know we’re going to have to probably take a couple of speculative leaps here, but just as a working hypothesis, what does a minimum effective dose of following a strict ketogenic diet look like for me?

Assuming the rest of the time I’m still doing intermittent fasting, I’m not eating a lot of refined carbohydrates, but how might you suggest that I think about that? Because I don’t know what the durability of kind of keto memory, like metabolic memory is. So I’m trying to figure out like can I get away with two, three to four-week periods a year where there’s some carryover of like cancer-protective — our last conversation we kind of talked about thinking about ketones as hormones, but in terms of neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, yada, yada, yada, what are your thoughts?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. Well, I think in your context it’s hard to say, like to give absolutes, but I would say you can get 80 percent of the benefits with a low-carb diet. Low-carb meaning 100 grams a day, just fibrous, non-starch, non-sugar carbs, low-carb Mediterranean, if you want to call it that.

And then periodically, maybe one week out of a month, get into a deeper state of ketosis and at higher is not better. We know that from the research. When ketones get into that two, three, four, five millimolar range, that creates energy toxicity and something we call reductive stress, and that is not good.

I did not know this before getting into this kind of research, but the sweet spot seems to be between one and two for therapeutic ketosis, unless you’re metabolically managing a disorder that’s highly responsive to a ketogenic diet like neurometabolic diseases.

And some of the things that we actually study need to be in the two to three millimolar. And oxygen toxicity needs to be like four to five because it’s a — very powerful seizures. But one to two seems to be the sweet spots for metabolic management of many different things and also just general metabolic health.

And I think what you’d be doing, just doing low-carb and periodic ketosis is just enhancing your metabolic flexibility and maybe increasing the diversity of food that you’re eating to prevent micronutrient deficiencies, too.

I am of the opinion that plants are good for you to eat broccoli, asparagus, salads, colorful vegetables, things like that, that kind of fit into a pattern of eating that we’ve known. Even things like lentils are probably good. Lentils actually have like zero CGM response to me, but I — 

Tim Ferriss: Really?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah, lentils seems to like, skyrocket other people that I know. I’m like completely flat. 

Tim Ferriss: I’m like somewhere in between. Yeah, I’m somewhere in between.

Dominic D’Agostino: Okay. Like completely flat. I don’t know. Maybe it’s the time of day that I have them at dinner, then I always go take a walk, but it’s like no bump at all in my CGM.

And I think that’s where CGM comes into play and we can do a personal precision engineered diet, if you will, and it gives us insight into the types of foods and the amount of foods that we can eat. And I think that’s going to be really important information.

And I know there’s a lot of people harping on, because another study came out on CGMs provide no benefit at all to the non-diabetic. And I’ve had this conversation with people actually at a big event and people that were type 2 diabetics and I asked them just flat-out, I just went around the table and just saying, “If you’re type 2 diabetic, when you were diagnosed like three years ago, if you were to be giving a CGM five years before that, or even one year before that, do you think you would’ve been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes?” And they said no.

They said once they got type 2 diabetes and got a CGM, it gave them the awareness. I mean, you can ask anyone who has flat-out over type 2 diabetes and just ask them the question, “Hey, if you were given a CGM a year or two in advance and you understood the impact of foods.” So I think a CGM is going to be important for delaying that Alzheimer’s disease. And if you have loved ones, Tim and your family, that I think you would encourage them to slap on a CGM and get some insight into what they’re eating.

But it’s also forcing them to exercise because we’re talking about diet here, but just getting out and doing a brisk walk 20, 30 minutes a day can go a long way. Resistance exercise, I’m a little biased towards that, but muscle is like an endocrine organ that produces hormones and various molecules that are neuroprotective and muscle is tightly linked to brain size and, of course, your waist and your visceral fat.

I would also encourage them to get a DEXA scan and gamify it and say, every year I’m going to get a DEXA scan and every year like I do, I just kind of create a lot of stress for myself to beat my DEXA scan every year and get their friends involved, make it like a social event. Everybody goes and gets their DEXA and then every year you go back and just try to beat your scores. But I mean, these are low-hanging fruit kind of things people should be doing.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. Let me, I think probably fair to say, make sure you consistently hydrate for any of these things like a DEXA scan.

I do have a follow-up question. So also on the exercise piece, people can look up something called klotho, K-L-O-T-H-O. There’s a lot more that comes of exercise like BDNF and all these various things. There’s a book called Spark that covers some of it, but it’s very outdated, but check out klotho. There are a lot of good reasons to exercise. Thinking of muscle like an endocrine organ, that’s a really good way to put it.

My question to you was, you mentioned, say, one week per month going to more of a lower carb or ketotic state. How would you think about the benefits of one week per month? Assuming that the rest of the time I’m behaving, most of the time with a lower carbohydrate Mediterranean diet, let’s just say, okay, one week per month, every three months or three weeks, like contiguous weeks once a quarter. Do you feel like one of those is superior to the other?

Dominic D’Agostino: Not really. I think whatever pattern works best, I think you would gain benefits for both. That would be an interesting experiment to do. 

Tim Ferriss: I’m just thinking about the lead time to get into a properly ketogenic state. If I’m going from some carbohydrate to ketosis, I’m just — we could talk about things that might accelerate it, but if it takes me two days to get there or three days and then I only have kind of four days in the sweet spot, these are things running through my mind. I’m just curious to get your take.

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. The one-week intervention for the month, my kind of opinion is that it could be pretty aggressive. Like you cut calories 50 percent the first two days and then cruise into it, so you’re really cranking ketones by the end of the week. And then you’re also cruising into it from what should be like a low-carb diet. So you should have that metabolic flexibility to kind of seamlessly transition into that ketosis state. And you could do intermittent fasting with mild caloric restriction for the first two days to ramp up ketones.

Alternatively, if your schedule permits and like your work schedule, you have like three weeks where you need to really dig deep into a research project or something and ketosis seems to give you that cognitive flow or boost, then that might situationally fit into your schedule. And I definitely have periods of time where I do that, especially like if my wife is traveling or something like that, or on a research project or something, I just like, okay, I clean the house of certain foods and then I just prepare.

I mean, simple things like that, too, I know just from the clinical ketogenic world is that if you have a family member that stocks the shelves with certain foods that can trigger and cause food noise, then that could really hamper your compliance to that. But you want to prepare the house, or if you’re going into a one week or you’re going into a three week, prepare the house and just make sure that you could do. Of course, you could just call Uber Eats and get anything delivered, but you want to kind of have the house prepared for that and mentally prepare for it.

Tim Ferriss: So for you, personally, if you had some hereditary gnarliness, if you look back at your family tree and you’re like, ooh, whether it’s a bunch of cancer or a bunch of neurodegenerative stuff, maybe bit of both, who knows, would you be more inclined to do the one week per month, just for you personally or yeah, one week per month?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. And I would shoot to get a glucose ketone index of like one to two for at least three days out of that week. So really do a fairly aggressive ketone metabolic therapy intervention, kind of even think about it as like a prescription intervention, just like Valter Longo’s diet is a prescription medical therapy, right?

So I would shoot to achieve a glucose ketone index of one to two for three days. And everything that we’ve seen in the lab that I’ve seen sort of on paper, of course, people aren’t out there measuring the autophagosome like P62 and other things, but that you are achieving a level of autophagy and that’s also stimulating many of the benefits of ketosis, not just ketones as an energy source, but you’re getting many of the robust signaling effects and really adapting your metabolism to fat and ketone sort of oxidation that has long-term benefits that can go at least three weeks.

So I’m convinced of that. So you get benefits for three weeks, reset one week, benefits for three weeks, reset one week so you’re always kind of getting — whereas if you do three weeks and then take a period of time off, I’m not totally convinced that those benefits are going to span that amount of timeframe. That’s my thinking.

Tim Ferriss: And you mentioned people can find calculators out there and actually a lot of the devices will try to provide this to you. Actually, is that true? I guess they would have to have both data streams, so probably not, but the GKI.

So the glucose ketone index, you can find calculators for this, but fact-check this, since this is AI overview from Google, I wanted to just take a look at it. Divide your blood glucose level by your ketone level. If your glucose is milligrams per deciliter, common in the US, you first divide it by 18, this is an important step, to convert it to millimolars per liter, matching the ketone units, then perform the division. So you can figure this out very easily. And that is the GKI that you were mentioning of a one to two.

What might that look like just offhand? I’m very not known for my quick mental arithmetic on the podcast, but what would a GKI of, say, one or two look like in terms of the readout on the glucose, on the glucometer and the readout on the finger prick for the millimolars for ketones? What would be an example?

Dominic D’Agostino: If people are like don’t want to do the millimolar concentration of glucose, if your glucose is 80 and then your ketones are two millimolar, that would be, you are right into that one to two kind of the glucose ketone index of one to two, you’ll be between that level.

If you could bring your glucose down to like 18, so like 68, 70 and get your ketones up to three, so that would be a GKI of one. So that’s pretty hard to achieve, but relatively definitely doable with exogenous ketones and MCT and things like that. I think what’s totally feasible is getting your glucose down to like 80, 80 to 85 in that range and getting your ketones at the end of the one-week fast up to two and maintaining that. So that would be kind of achieving that GKI of two.

Tim Ferriss: I think I’m probably saying what I wish to be true, which is that my insulin sensitivity has improved a lot in the last certainly year in particular, and that is to explain in part, or maybe wholly, the lower readout on the ketone meters.

But part of the reason I have confidence in that is that I’m using the same devices that I used to use. And back in the day, I would have much higher millimolar readouts.

Of course, I have new strips. I did, at least to the extent that I can, for the continuous monitors, I’ve done calibration for the CGM at least, the glucose monitor, but that presents a problem. Even if that is, “Good news, Tim Ferriss, you’re not failing at keto. You’ve actually just made yourself a lot healthier with intermittent fasting and other things,” it still presents a problem for me to figure out if I am in that GKI sweet spot.

So how would you suggest I try to figure that out? Is there a way to measure my ketone uptake and, therefore, modify the equation such that I factor that in somehow? Like there’s a multiplier of the readout on the finger prick or something like that? How would you handle that?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. Let me look real quick.

Tim Ferriss: Dom is looking into his Santa’s workshop of various metabolic devices.

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. So I have a lot of different devices. So one is the Keto-Mojo device here.

Tim Ferriss: Yep, that’s the one I have. Yeah, I’ve got the Keto-Mojo.

Dominic D’Agostino: Okay. So that, I mean, you could just calibrate it such that it reads in millimolar concentration in glucose and ketones, and it actually gives you, this is the GKI version. It’ll just spit out the GKI.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, you know what? I do have the GKI because you’re right, the Keto-Mojo also measures glucose.

I guess what I’m asking for myself is since my readouts are so low, presumably as a placeholder due to improved insulin sensitivity and ketone utilization, I’m going to fail if I’m just using the glucose and the ketone strips for the Keto-Mojo. Because right now, if it’s telling me that I’m at 0.4 millimolars, and I can tell you subjectively, I do not feel like I’m at 0.4. I feel like I’ve got a lot more juice and a lot more gas in the tank.

Is there a way to, whether it’s on paper or otherwise, account for the increased ketone utilization? I mean, it’d be great for me just to verify that somehow, but then whether I can verify it or not, if I wanted to try to determine during that week, like if I’m hitting my target GKI, how would you suggest that someone like me do that if I’m just not getting the numbers necessary to make the regular math work?

Dominic D’Agostino: So one to two is a high bar, I guess, a GKI of one to two. And I think we’ve had this conversation back and forth with this group that we’re working with in the cancer community.

The Society for Integrative Metabolic Oncology is a group that we’re discussing the GKI, and Thomas Seyfried is very adamant about, like, getting to one to two. But I give pushback and say one to four is if you look at the published literature, one to four is absolutely 100 percent therapeutic across not only cancer, but also like seizures and everything. So I’m going to expand that range to a one to four.

So what does that mean? That would mean that your glucose level can be upwards of 80. And so you could have a glucose level of 75 to 80, and then get your ketone levels to one, and that would be a GKI of one essentially if you don’t have the glucose calibration for that. Or that would be a GKI of four, rather. And it would be really rare, if not impossible, for anyone in the general population eating to even achieve a GKI of like 5 to 10. So that’s indicative of high fat oxidation, ketone production, and I think that you’re getting a lot of therapeutic benefits. Also, a millimolar concentration of one in your blood represents a 10 percent available energy for your brain. And also the Keto-Mojo devices measuring D-beta-hydroxybutyrate. And if you’re doing supplementation with racemic D and L, then you’re not picking up the L. So that could be a factor too if you’re using racemic ketone salts.

And there’s a number of publications that have already happened and some in the pipeline basically showing that elevate hydroxybutyrate takes about 4 to 5 times longer to metabolize. So that’s in circulation more. And also like, if you’re on a ketogenic diet for reasons we don’t fully understand and we are to rip out the heart, about 34 to 40 percent of the ketone in the heart is elevate hydroxybutyrate. And we don’t know why it converts the D to the L, but it serves a function that — the groups that have done the research are convinced it’s not an energetic, but it’s actually impacting cardiac output and reducing peripheral vascular resistance, maybe at the glycocalyx. So I don’t want to go down that rabbit hole. But basically, it’s like if your heart is pumping against pressure and think of it as like a garden hose and you take the kink out of the garden hose, the elevate hydroxybutyrate is taking the kink out of the garden hose of your vascular endothelium and then that’s also in your brain. So you have better blood flow to your brain.

I mean, there’s tons of data out there showing an increase in brain blood flow with beta-hydroxybutyrate and the L trends better to increasing that blood flow. We do a Doppler blood flow measurement on various wound healing things that we’ve done in the lab. I mean, a lot of people have vascular dementia, right?

Tim Ferriss: Yep.

Dominic D’Agostino: So there’s different types of dementia, and it might be not like completely one or the other. And the metabolic phenotype of dementia could be vascular. You get a restriction of oxygen and energy to the brain. My point is that one millimolar of beta-hydroxybutyrate in circulation has an energetic effect and it also has a pronounced effect on the vascular endothelium to increase blood flow and circulation. So you are getting a benefit.

Tim Ferriss: I’ve never had this experience in ketosis before where these levels have been this low. It’s so bizarre. And yet, let’s say, back in the day before the intermittent fasting, and it’s pretty much the lever that I pulled that I think changed things. Prior to that, I could tell you probably within 60 minutes of hitting 0.7 millimolars on the precision extra. Like I knew when my brain clicked past that point. And I did years and years and years of this stuff. I think as much as I like to measure things, I should just assume, right? If I’m having a bowl of mackerel dog food with MCT oil and apple cider vinegar and salt and pepper, then having a meal later that effectively has close to zero carbohydrates, if I’m doing that for almost three weeks, there doesn’t seem to be a physiological option C for failure, right?

It’s like, what’s my body going to do? It has to be doing something because I’m not getting the dietary carbohydrate, and I’m not just mainlining whey protein isolate all day. So, I think I’ll probably just have to trust in the process because if I do have the increased ketone utilization and I’m just somewhere between 0.2 and 0.4 millimolars, for the most point, or for the most part, I just don’t think that the math might be really hard even to hit the GKI of four. But it’s like, if you’re following the process, I guess you’re following the process, right?

Dominic D’Agostino: I say trust the process and also think about — I’m talking about like blood biomarkers, but let’s talk about physical metrics that could be considered biomarkers, right?

So for me, it’s all about the numbers. Like my lab books and stuff like that have numbers in the lab, but also training. It’s like, I know exactly what I’m going to do going into the next workout and it’s all about X amount of weight for X amount of reps. So you can also do that with various brain training apps where you can do reaction time. So for our NASA NEEMO experiments where we’re in an extreme environment and we’re working with astronauts, we’re assessing reaction time, decision making, risk taking, where like this balloon blows up and you don’t know when it’s going to blow up, but you have to stop. It’s like a weird risk game.

So we have this whole metric of testing cognitive function, reaction time and things like that. So there are things that you could do even with an app-based thing to assess that, and I think that would be a good thing. We have a massive NIH grant at University of South Florida on brain training games and assessing performance on that. Alzheimer’s was in my family, I would basically be doing everything possible, physical training, dietary metabolic training with nutrition, supplementation, and also brain training.

And brain training games, and we use Joggle, the NIH Toolbox, I mean, we have like about six or eight different types of tests that we do to get a very objective measure of cognitive function. And I think it would be good to establish that now and then get your baseline just like we’re doing a DEXA for body composition, and then test that every six months. And then do it in the absence and presence of being in ketosis. So I would suggest something like that.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. I have time blocked out in my calendar this Friday to do a whole battery of cognitive testing. And again, this is not super precise, but having tracked myself for so long and developed a water fuel for certain types of performance, zone two feels a lot easier right now, a lot easier than usual. And coming back to your prior comments. And then, I would say, I’m using software right now. At some point I’ll be able to talk more about this, but to basically train my visual processing to compensate for presbyopia, it is crazy, some of the effects that this stuff has. But it also is very much indirectly a measure of reaction speed, and they see some really cool carryover effects. And my speed in terms of time to completion for four bouts, like modules of tasks has just gone up and up and up since I’ve sort of been in extended ketosis. Again, that’s very easy for me to see. So folks who are listening, I’ll have more to share on that later, but it’s pretty mind-blowing stuff. 

So Dom, a few things have come up that I would love to chat about because I get these questions all the time, which relate to exogenous ketones. And people have heard this term, exogenous, endogenous. It’s very fancy talk and a tuxedo for outside the body, in the body, right? I’m simplifying here, but the easy way to remember exogenous is exoskeleton, right? It’s like a skeleton on the outside of your body. Exogenous ketones, ketones that you’re taking from outside and putting inside. People always ask, and I know you have a dog in the fight here, so I want to recognize that too. But how should people think about supplemental ketones? And are there any warnings or disclaimers that you want to add to that, right?

Because this is a topic du jour. I think there’s probably no biological free lunch if people are going to be mainlining fruity pebbles and eating tons of carbohydrates, maybe not a great idea to eat tons of exogenous ketones. I don’t know, I’d be curious to get your take on that. But what’s the good, the bad, and the ugly of exogenous ketones? Where should people go? How should they think about it?

Dominic D’Agostino: The things to consider would be when you’re thinking about a ketone supplement to think about palatability. If it doesn’t taste okay, you’re not going to consume it. I would, but most people won’t. Palatability, tolerability, if it gives you disaster pants or it makes you nauseous or something. So palatability, tolerability, and then the next one, the third one would be the pharmacokinetics. So you want something that when you consume it, that it has an ideal pharmacokinetics, meaning it’s not going to spike up in 30 minutes and be out of your system in like an hour or two.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. Pharmacokinetics is like the stock chart for something you put in your body, right? In this case, right?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah, yeah. And that’s important because if you have a very rapid rate of rise of ketones, that can trigger an insulin response. And what I’ve observed, if I’m cruising in ketosis and I take a large dose of a ketone ester, it shoots my ketones up real high and it’s back down within like two hours, but it also kicks out insulin and that shuts off my own ketone production. Then I’m hypoketotic and hypoglycemic from the insulin. And that can create an energy deficit in the brain.

Tim Ferriss: How long does that last for you?

Dominic D’Agostino: And it lasts in the context of consuming, for example, a ketone ester by itself. But if you consume the ketone ester with MCT, if you could tolerate that, you could buffer that response to some extent, or you take it with food or something, or you could avert that by different ketone formulations and we could talk about that. But I just want to move down, so you got palatability, tolerability, pharmacokinetic properties, and you also have toxicity. So that would be the four things that you need to consider when sort of selecting an exogenous ketone. And those things differ depending upon if you’re using it acutely, like in a medical situation, or it’s like a daily thing that you want to take every day for prevention, right?

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, let’s talk about toxicity first.

Dominic D’Agostino: Toxicity is probably the most important too.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. Let’s, for the time being, not talk about the acute medical delivery. Let’s talk about recreational/better said layperson use, right? This is as a dietary supplement. So could you speak to the toxicity piece?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. Well, what we observed about 10 years ago was that formulations that contained 1,3-Butanediol, that includes an ester. I have a lot of patents on and I have actually ongoing experiments with 1,3-Butanediol by itself is a ketogenic agent and that can have toxicity when used chronically. 1,3-Butanediol is an alcohol dimer and it gets metabolized through alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase. Aldehyde dehydrogenase kicks out a beta-hydroxybutyrate aldehyde that can be toxic.

Tim Ferriss: How is it toxic? What are its toxic effects?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. So alcohol dehydrogenase uses NAD, consumes NAD as its function, right? So it can basically deplete the liver of NAD. And aldehyde dehydrogenase also consumes up NAD and it rapidly depletes, for example, the liver, the hepatocytes of ATP. So we know that there’s a paper coming out that’ll show that in our lab we’ve seen therapeutic effects in certain contexts, but when delivered acutely. But when consumed chronically, when we go beyond our experimental window and give these things chronically as like a lifestyle, exogenous ketone. And then we sacrifice the animals and then we do blood work and we look at the liver, we see signs that are scary, right? And this could be inflammation in the liver, TNF-α, sinusoidal dilation, sort of like gaps in the liver, fatty liver, a number of different things start to surface. And that’s pretty much just due to metabolizing something that’s considered a toxin to the body, 1,3-Butanediol.

It’s a very versatile drug. 1,3-Butanediol by itself is more toxic than 1,3-Butanediol based ketone esters. So you have the ketone monoester, which is technically the millimolar concentration. You have 51 percent of a ketone monoester is 1,3-Butanediol. So it hydrolyzed in the liver, gets into circulation. Still over 50 percent of that is 1,3-Butanediol. That kind of needs to be detoxified, but 1,3-Butanediol does get broken down to beta-hydroxybutyrate. The diester is about 35 percent 1,3-Butanediol. So, I see these as potentially problematic.

Tim Ferriss: The diester is what percentage?

Dominic D’Agostino: A ketone diester, which would be 11,3-Butanediol with two ketones on it. We use acetyl acetate on each, that’s 35 percent of that molecule is 1,3-Butanediol in circulation.

Tim Ferriss: I got it.

Dominic D’Agostino: And then the beta-hydroxybutyrate monoester is 51 percent 1,3-Butanediol in circulation. So this can become problematic when it’s used as like a supplement and a lifestyle thing like day in and day out.

Tim Ferriss: Can you translate from the animal models to humans, do you think, right? Because we all know, humans are not just big furry mice, right? Do you think it translates, right? And this might be just like a precautionary measure where it’s like, “Well…” Like pending additional studies, let’s hit pause in a sense. But if it were to translate, do you have any idea what type of dosing per day or per week with which we might see this toxicity in humans, right?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. So there is a paucity of data, and there’s a deficiency of data on the use of these agents 1,3-Butanediol that are long-term studies. The only study that I’m aware of is a case report with Dr. Mary Newport’s husband, Steve, and then there’s a 28-day study that used 25 grams. 

Tim Ferriss: 25 grams.

Dominic D’Agostino: 25 grams per day, yeah.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, shit.

Dominic D’Agostino: And that produces like 0.1 to 1 millimolar. But what I have done is I took the R-1,3-Butanediol and then the racemic 1,3-Butanediol at different time points. And I basically dosed it for two weeks to keep my ketone levels at two millimolar, which would be like a therapeutic. And when you do that, what you will see, and I — well, I was going to say, I tell people that go ahead and do it, but maybe don’t do this. But when you take something like 1,3-Butanediol at a dose, which for me requires 30 milliliters three times per day to keep at two millimolar throughout the course of the day. If you do that for two weeks and then you test your transaminases, so that would be AST, ALT, and GGT, they will go up, so that’s a clear indication that — so we’ve done this in animals and fed it at a pretty high level, and we did not see transaminases going up. 

Tim Ferriss: So transaminases are what people could think of as liver enzymes on their blood panels, right? ALT. Is GGT typically tested?

Dominic D’Agostino: GGT is like the wild carb, but what’s good about GGT is it’s the canary in the coal mine. It will go up before ALT and AST. If you expect someone has a problem with alcohol and they say they’re not drinking and you want to figure out if they’re drinking or not, say, “Hey, can I see your blood work and make sure the doctor adds GGT just to get a better,” and that’s elevated and your AST are not. The only things that’ll really shoot up GGT is like alcohol. And also the size of the red blood cell too can be if they’re like larger, that’s an indication like someone’s drinking too much alcohol. And it could be just like two or three glasses a day, but that will elevate GGT. So we observed that transaminases actually didn’t go up in our animals fed. The ketone esters or 1,3-Butanediol chronically, but when we pulled the livers out and then looked at the livers, then we saw things that concerned us. And we published this recently.

And it’s good to know when someone has non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, they can have normal transaminases but have a necrotic liver. 

Tim Ferriss: Yuck. I did not know that. It’s terrifying.

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah, yeah. I mean, you look very closely at ALT longitudinally and that creeps up, but you basically have to do like a CT scan or a high resolution ultrasound of the liver. And basically, you could just take a subset of the American population that trends to be overweight and you do some liver scans and you find that they can have overt fatty liver disease and have completely normal transaminases are just trending up, right?

Tim Ferriss: Mm-hmm.

Dominic D’Agostino: So my liver enzymes tend to trend a little bit higher just because I eat a lot of protein. So with 1,3-Butanediol and 1,3-Butanediol based ketone esters, you have a problem with tolerability, palatability, potentially feasible pharmacokinetics and also toxicity. So it almost like checks all the boxes in a negative way. So the field is trending towards non 1,3-Butanediol based exogenous ketones, and that could be free acids, it could be a triester with glycerol and also the ketone electrolyte salts, but you could also avert part of this just by formulation. The issue is that companies have one molecule and then they test that one molecule, but you could — I think formulation is the way to go. And companies don’t want to hear that because they have all their IP in one molecule. But we’ve always been a formulation kind of based lab, and always saw that these things always have drawbacks when used as a monotherapy, but when you start combining them together, that’s when you get better therapeutic effects.

Tim Ferriss: Got the hounds out there. Hopefully, not next to the gators. We won’t spend any time on this, but I just wanted to tell people that before we start recording, you’re telling me that you caught a 10-foot alligator that was trying to eat your dogs and then you pinned it down and taped its mouth and then measured its glucose and ketones. Turns out that alligator had a pretty good GKI, but that’s a story for another time. So only in the things that Dom would do category that stand out, but we’re talking about a lot of terms that are likely unfamiliar to folks. I don’t want to throw anybody under the bus here, but people should do their homework. 1,3-Butanediol is very, very, very common. It’s very inexpensive, or relatively inexpensive to produce. So just keep an eye out for 1,3-Butanediol. If this is of interest to you, I have no investment in any ketone supplement company or anything.

I do not have a stake in this, but I would like to ask a couple of things. So I have experimented, as you know, with ketone monoester, diester, ketone salts, I’ve played with everything, and I’ve found the diester to cause quite a bit of intestinal discomfort, to put it mildly, at least the first one or two times. I will say for folks, if at first you don’t succeed, meaning you have to run to the toilet. You may acclimate to it, which I did in that case, but I felt subjectively less and less effect. I seem to develop tolerance very quickly. I don’t know why that would be the case, but I seem to experience it. The ketone monoester, which is the 1,3-Butanediol bound to BHB, if I understand it correctly, right? I do like that. I like the subjective feeling of it, but if that’s only at about 11 milliliters.

If I take 25 plus, speaking to your pharmacokinetics, right? Like the stock pops and then it drops and then I feel very tired and often feel more anxiety. It seems to prompt in me more anxiety. I mean, look, we got to talk about this. Not that it invalidates what you’re saying in any way, but your wife runs a company that sells ketone salts, which I also I’ve been using most consistently. Keto’s Therapy, people can check it out. But on the ketone monoester, what I’m wondering is if I’m only taking, let’s say, 11 milliliters once or twice a day, and I’m taking it alongside MCT oil, where would you put the risk analysis on something like that?

Dominic D’Agostino: I would say, the risk is very minimal for a healthy person. So I have a super healthy liver. I even take N-acetylcysteine, alpha-lipoic acid, all these things. So I was surprised to see sort of liver climbing. What we see in our older animals is that they are selectively vulnerable to 1,3-Butanediol toxicity from acutely and also chronically. So for a normal healthy person, especially someone that’s sort of really good metabolic health and liver function and they don’t drink or drugs that compromise the liver, I would say upwards of 1,3-Butanediol 20 to 20 milliliters a day is probably where you want to cap it and maybe not do it every day. 1,3-Butanediol based ketone ester would do that, but you can also probably achieve and maintain the same level of ketosis with a ketone salt, a beta-hydroxybutyrate salt.

And I do like the idea of a D and the L, the two enantiomers, which is a conversation that you may or may not want to have. So the L is basically like, it’s packaged beta-hydroxybutyrate in the time release form and it has some signaling effects. And then you have free acids too that are coming up on the market, and various liposomal formulations. I’m not sure if they’re commercially available yet, but these are some things in the pipeline. But yeah, 1,3-Butanediol based monoester, I think there’s good data behind it. I think the science that’s published is biased under the direction because that was the molecule that a lot of companies associate with, and then they test that molecule in and of itself as a monotherapy. And I am of the opinion that things are definitely optimized. You could avert a lot of the problems just by formulation.

Tim Ferriss: How does the MCT oil help? I guess basically it makes the ramp up more gradual. Is that the effect that the sort of co-consumption of the MCT oil has?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. It delays gastric absorption for one thing, but it’s also stimulating your endogenous production. So the MCT goes to the liver, not through like chylomicrons, it goes right to the liver and stimulates your body’s ketone production. And I think that’s important. It’s almost like training your liver to ramp up fat oxidation, and it’s almost like exercising your liver to stimulate it. What we’ve also observed, and we published on that, like a large dose of MCT, when you take the liver out and look at it, there’s globules of fat all in the liver.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, that sounds bad.

Dominic D’Agostino: Well, we see a fatty liver, but we did not see evidence of necrosis, but we did see some inflammatory markers.

Tim Ferriss: Necrosis is dead tissue, dead cells.

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. Yeah, we did not see that, but we saw signs. We saw sinusoidal dilation and TNF-α was elevated and some other things to suggest that large doses of MCT. And if you do the human equivalence, it would be like me taking upwards of like 80 to 100 milliliters per day. So that’s a lot.

Tim Ferriss: Although, it’s not that much though, right? I mean, because 30 milliliters is like two tablespoons, is that roughly, right? So it’s like six tablespoons. If you’re just squirting it into your coffee, it’s not hard to necessarily get above a hundred. It’s actually pretty easy. So where would you recommend capping MCT consumption? I’ll get rid of my camel back with the MCT oil in it, but where would you recommend capping the MCT consumption?

Dominic D’Agostino: The studies that were done showing benefits is like 20 milliliters per day, but they only did a single dose, which is weird, but that was the old Axona studies. And like 80 percent of people tolerated that, 20 percent didn’t. But I’m of the opinion that 20 milliliters twice per day would be perfectly fine for essentially most people that can tolerate that. And you’re going to have probably about 30 percent or more that can, but MCT is much more tolerable when you take it with a meal. So if you take MCT on empty stomach, prepare to be closer to a bathroom, right? So yeah.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. Of all the disgusting things that I have consumed in my life, and I’ve had a lot, right? I mean, I’ve tried early prototypes of some of the esters and all sorts of stuff. I’m not going to say it was a Piña Colada, but I was fine with it. MCT oil to this day, I just find so absolutely revolting. I don’t know if it’s the neutrality and the mouth feel, but mixed with the mackerel and that apple cider vinegar, it sounds so disgusting. My friend almost puked in his mouth yesterday when I was describing it. It’s actually really good. I’m just a sucker for mackerel. I’ll take mackerel over sardines all day long, but — let’s see here… So I think we’ve covered a lot of the exogenous ketones. I’ll just pull this from our text thread because I think it might be a question on some people’s minds.

As I was trying to troubleshoot my apparent failure mode with ketosis because of my low numbers, I asked you, is there any argument to be made that I should have a ketogenic breakfast instead of intermittent fasting? Could it be that I’m causing problems with exogenous ketones, right? Am I delaying potentially the onset of my own ketosis? Is it like TRT, right? If you’re taking exogenous, remember that word, if you’re injecting or rubbing on or swallowing testosterone, it’s like your Leydig cells are pretty smart. That’s the reason your balls turn into Raisinets is because it’s like, “Cool, we don’t have to make that anymore.” So I thought, am I shooting myself in the foot by taking exogenous ketones? And it sounds like a little bit goes a long way, but like most things, in excess, it becomes its opposite, right? It becomes a hindrance and makes it problematic. Is that fair to say?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. We’ve only seen the anti-endogenous ketosis effect with 1,3-Butanediol or 1,3-Butanediol-based ketone esters, and that is due in part to their potency and also the rapid elevation of ketones seem to have an insulin effect that can double or triple insulin. And even if we elevate ketones to the same level with a salt, we don’t see that spike up in insulin. So that could be coming into play with your low ketones if you are consuming the monoester.

Tim Ferriss: Not much. Every once in a while, like before exercise, because I might not mind the spike, but I’m not consuming a ton. Yeah.

Dominic D’Agostino: But the breakfast, I’m of the opinion that protein loading in the morning, actually when you first wake up, and I think Donald Layman and maybe Stu Phillips would also agree with this, and maybe Layne Norton too, the protein guys in the camp, is that protein in the morning kind of amps up your metabolism throughout the rest of the day. And I think if you abstain from eating during the day, you tend to get the munchies later in the day and you tend to overeat, whereas if you have a protein-heavy meal in the morning with high fat, then that can sort of rev up your metabolism for a good part of the day. But then again, some people, me included, my mind is not as sharp when I have — 

Tim Ferriss: Well, that’s the thing. That’s the thing, right?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, I would say that, I mean, for 15 years, the sort of 30 grams within 30 minutes of waking up has been this sort of easy to remember heuristic that I’ve recommended for folks and that, if I am not intermittent fasting, that’s also what I do, but I’ve become so addicted to the mental sharpness that it’s just like, man, I know that if, for instance, if I want to do three hours of writing, I do not want to have food immediately prior to that.

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: But I would say, I’m also at a point, I think, where throwing up really heavy weight for me and getting as big and strong as possible is just not — it’s less of a priority than it once was, after shoulder surgeries and elbow surgeries and various things. Not that I want to be the skinniest guy in the room, but — 

Okay. It sounds like the pharmacokinetics are maybe to blame with the associated spike in insulin for some of the issues you might run into if you’re taking the 1,3-Butanediol-based products.

Dominic D’Agostino: It can be, and I suspect it is, and I’ve kind of proven with myself that’s the case, but it also can be mitigated in part by mixing, taking it with a meal or taking it with MCT. But then you get the — it is metabolized, like 30 milliliters of 1,3-Butanediol is kind of like 30 milliliters of ethanol.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

Dominic D’Agostino: And then 1,3-Butanediol can create dependence and it also can create — you get withdrawal. So it’s establishing literature. There’s several publications just showing that with 1,3-Butanediol will produce dependency, and when you abruptly stop 1,3-Butanediol after consuming it for a period of time, there’s essentially alcohol withdrawal from that.

Tim Ferriss: What are the symptoms of that? I mean, imagine you don’t get DT, right? You’re not getting shakes or anything, are you? But, I mean, what happens?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah, it is, I mean, it’s like classical kind of ethanol withdrawal, maybe not quite as dramatic, but the glycols or diol alcohols do have a GABAergic effect, so you’re doing that. And yeah, I mean, it’s well established it has narcotic-like properties and that kind of stymied its use as a synthetic food for space flight. Well, I think that the palatability also factored into that, but also in the literature, it notes a narcotic effect of this and then the animal studies and really showed dependency and withdrawal.

Tim Ferriss: Just to give a reiteration of that, I mean, the 1,3-Butanediol-based stuff is also sold as an alcohol replacement. So of course, being the idiot that I am, not idiot, just like I’m eager to experiment here and there if it’s not going to kill me, and so I thought, “You know what? I don’t want to drink tonight.” I remember where I was. I was in Upstate New York, about to go to a restaurant with a friend. I knew he would want to drink, and then I wanted to be able to say, “Hey, I already had this ahead of time. Don’t worry. We’re on the same level.”

And I chugged a small can. It wasn’t, in terms of liquid volume, a lot, right? I don’t know, six ounces, eight ounces. And I felt like I could barely walk to the bathroom. I was smashed. It was, like almost knocked a glass off the table. I was like, “Holy shit, I did not do this risk assessment properly. Thank God I’m not about to get into a car,” because it took a little while to wear off. So that narcotic effect is really, it’s not always subtle.

Dominic D’Agostino: I made jello shots. I made 1,3-Butanediol jello shots. And before we made the ketone esters in 2009, Patrick Arnold and I kind of formulated this.

Tim Ferriss: Patrick Arnold. So people who don’t recognize Patrick, listen to my conversation with him from years ago, but if you know BALCO or remember when Barry Bonds grew a few head sizes or any of that stuff, anyway, Patrick’s got some stories.

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: So the jello shots, so what happened with the jello shots?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. Well, that was the way to get it down because 1,3-Butanediol is so nasty, right? So you could basically just warm up pure 1,3-Butanediol in a pot and then add cherry-flavored sugar-free jello and then stir it up and then pour it into like a cookie pan and then cut it into cubes, which you get 20 milliliters per jello shot, and make it pretty strong so it’s like firm jello, and I would just hit like two or three of them and just be buzzing. And I talk about it, like 1,3-Butanediol can be fun and it’s a lesser of two evils when we’re talking about ethanol. So I actually tried to file a patent for the use of 1,3-Butanediol for alcohol withdrawal and things like that. But actually, there was some prior art on that, and this is many years ago, but I actually do think it could be part used by people if they could transition off of ethanol, potentially use that, but there are other ways to get off alcohol. I’m not advocating for that.

But my concern, is why I’m talking about it now too, is that I know there’s older people out there with dementia, perhaps Alzheimer’s disease, that if they’re consuming 1,3-Butanediol as a ketogenic supplement, it’s going to make you dizzy. It’s going to decrease your stability, like it’s going to make you potentially fall, break your hip. And then when you’re older, your liver, your ability to detoxify alcohol, an 80-year-old only has like 20 or 30 percent of the capacity to do that. So the same amount of 1,3-Butanediol for a 20-year-old is going to be like three to five times harder on your liver as we age, right? And people note that, like as you age, you just can’t tolerate the same amount of alcohol.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

Dominic D’Agostino: So I think these things, the 1,3-Butanediol-based supplements, the straight up 1,3-Butanediol and 1,3-Butanediol-based ketone esters are problematic for the age population that I think some of these products or companies are targeting. And I say that not only as a scientist, but because of the volume of emails that I get on that. People were like, “I got super buzzed. I didn’t know what happened.” And some people are very sensitive to it, like I gave my wife — she can’t tolerate alcohol at all and she took a shot glass of the stuff and she could not believe that it was a legal supplement to sell.

And now this will probably interest a lot of people, so they’ll probably go out and buy it, but I’m just saying like if you’re sensitive to alcohol, you’re going to get overly buzzed, and my concern is that, hey, if you want to use it for recreational, that’s your thing and maybe it’s better than alcohol, but for older people, a large dose of 1,3-Butanediol is problematic from a narcotic, from just the potential for just getting drunk, just straight up drunk. And Dr. Veech told me that a long time ago, I was like, because I was trying to get the ester from him and I was like, “What if I just use 1,3-Butanediol?” It’s like, “You’ll get drunk.” So it’s like he instilled that, that, “Do not do that.” That’s what he said.

Tim Ferriss: And Veech was the co-inventor, is that fair to say, of the bonded monoester that was funded in part by, was it the DOD or DARPA?

Dominic D’Agostino: DARPA.

Tim Ferriss: DARPA and then patented at Oxford. Is that right? Am I getting my facts straight or am I getting things mixed up?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. Well, Oxford sort of acquired the IP and made a company out of it, but we have to credit Dr. Richard Veech, who passed away a few years ago, for the conception of a ketone ester for just — Dr. Veech was the student of Hans Kreb.

Tim Ferriss: Kreb of Krebs cycle?

Dominic D’Agostino: Krebs cycle, yes.

Tim Ferriss: That’s wild. Wow.

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah.

I went to Dr. Veech’s lab at the NIH. I saw the whole ketone process, I tested different things. We were in communication, and I think he was a very colorful character and he had an amazing mind. We disagreed, we agreed to disagree on some things, but I consider him a mentor of mine, and I think we all owe a lot. I don’t think exogenous ketones may even not exist. Well, Henri Brunengraber and some other people, Sami Hashim developed the triester. So there was other people in this space, but he really advanced the science and ultimately the application of exogenous ketones and I think has written extensively about it. I mean, these things were around for a long time, and I think as science advances, we have more information and then we can — I have pivoted away from these things, although we still use them in some experiments. I published some really nice data on 1,3-Butanediol, actually even in cancer studies too, but at the same time, I realized that the negative effects, I can pivot away from that. We have other molecules in development now.

Tim Ferriss: So I know as I’m watching things get dark on the East Coast for you that we’ll wrap up in just a few minutes. But in brief, you mentioned fat, salt, fiber as things that can be helpful for slowing, I guess, gastric emptying of these meals that I’m having. And I’m curious for you, on a ketogenic diet, what are your favorite sources of fiber, supplemental or in whole food form?

Dominic D’Agostino: Whole food form. I like broccoli, and I buy broccoli florets, and then I cut the tip of the floret off, and I have a bowl of that and I give the stalk and stuff to my dogs and I chop it up for their fiber. So that’s something that I do, I don’t know, just to get a higher dose of broccoli. But broccoli, and then wild blueberries that has about half of the sugar and more fiber. They’re about a quarter of the size of like the huge blueberries you buy at, like, Walmart. But so wild blueberries, I like apples because they have a certain fiber called pectin in it. Some people that have a problem with fiber can’t digest pectin or they get gassy, so it’s on the FODMAP list or whatever. But wild blueberries, just green vegetables in general, but I like broccoli, and apples are pretty much something I have every day.

Tim Ferriss: Now, the wild blueberries, I just want to really underline wild for people because that is not what you’re necessarily going to get at your local grocery store that’s been optimized to be as sweet as — 

Dominic D’Agostino: No. They’re in Publix. So I can get them in Publix down here. And I think, I don’t know, actually I think they’re in Walmart too. I think you can go to Walmart, and I think you might have to sneak around for them, but there’s like a brand, they have wild raspberries and blueberries and blackberries together. I forget the name of the brand, but they come in like big two or three-pound bags too.

Tim Ferriss: How much can you eat of apples or berries before undoing all the good metabolic work that you’re doing in ketosis, right? Because even, for instance, we’ve talked about how easy it is, and it really is easy as long as you’re pretty simple to please dietarily, to, say, travel for keto, right? So you just pack a bunch of canned sardines, mackerel, maybe some oysters, and macadamia nuts, and you’re kind of good to go, like these things are pretty calorically dense. But the macadamia nuts, I was looking at the bag the other day because it’s one of the few kind of crunchy things that I feel like I can eat aside from some of these vegetables, and I was like, “Wow, if you go whole hog in the macadamia nuts, you can rack up the carbs after a while.” What about apples and berries? Where’s your cutoff point for yourself?

Dominic D’Agostino: Well, macadamia nuts actually have that three-to-one to four-to-one ratio of fat to — so they are pretty high in fat, but like cashews and then like almonds and other nuts. I like walnuts too, I forgot to mention. So I have walnuts, a small organic apples we buy, wild blueberries, and broccoli pretty much every day, and all that together ends up being about 60 to 70 grams of carbs, but one third of the carbs is fiber, so it’s essentially non-glycemic. I haven’t had any of that today, but I tend to have that at dinner and then my snack at nighttime. So everything that I just mentioned, the carbs. But I don’t think about it as undoing like ketosis, and I do think my glucose tank is always like maybe 10 or 20 percent full, so I’m always running kind of low on glucose, and on some days I’m more active.

Tim Ferriss: What’s your height and weight, Dom, at the moment?

Dominic D’Agostino: Six foot, 220, and I’ve been, give or take, five pounds for years now, yeah. So just always cruise at like 220. Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. I mean — 

Dominic D’Agostino: 100 kilograms.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, good body composition. That is a lot of muscle for people who are not watching the video. I’m just trying to set the maybe context for what your tolerance might be for grams of carbohydrates.

Dominic D’Agostino: I have pretty good tolerance for carbs now, but I think I have good tolerance more now because I’ve titrated some carbs back in, because I did go probably at least five years on like very low, like clinical ketogenic. And I did end up losing like almost like 18 pounds of like lean body mass, and then I took a year off in 2018, when we bought our farm. I was very busy on the farm. Then I bought weights and just have it on the farm. And then I’ve been doing DEXA. My last DEXA, it was 218, but under — I was like 9.8 percent body fat, like still under 10 percent. But I gained muscle when I got back into lifting and just did the heavy compound movements again. I don’t go super crazy on the weight, but I do train hard. But — 

Tim Ferriss: You found the addition of the carbohydrates to be beneficial, that slightly higher quantity of carbohydrates?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. I’ve added more carbs back in over the years, and that has helped me maintain my body weight. And I like eating those foods. I enjoy those foods. I think they have beneficial fiber, phytonutrients, other micronutrients that I think are beneficial. And I can maintain a level of ketosis about 0.5 to 1.5 day in and day out eating those foods every day. And I do titrate in like the MCTs and I get like one or two packets of KetoStart of day, maybe up to three if I’m traveling, but that’s my normal protocol and that has optimized all my biomarkers. I actually got full blood work today. Kind of waiting for that to come back to see. It should be interesting. I was inadvertently took something that I thought was laced with something, some gummies I told you about, but — 

Tim Ferriss: People are going to assume. When people hear gummies, they assume it’s THC, but this was what, theanine and magnesium? It should have been really innocuous, right? Is that right?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. Theanine and magnesium, my wife bought it at Marshalls. We both took two. We woke up in the morning and she says,” I’m dizzy.” She’s asking me, “What did you give me last night?” I was like, “I didn’t give you anything.” Because sometimes I give her stuff. I tried to get up, fell flat on the floor. Both of us could not walk. We were both completely incapacitated. I called the Poison Control Center. And yeah, so basically I’ve been running around to different labs, and now I’m doing forensics, so do something. I’m still buzzed — 

Tim Ferriss: Wow. Really?

Dominic D’Agostino: — so if I don’t seem like myself, because I’m still buzzed 48 hours later. So we took something — 

Tim Ferriss: That is wild.

Dominic D’Agostino: We had the spinnies, and even this morning I woke up, I had the spinnies walking to — so whatever it was, it was pretty powerful. And I have a little bit of a back injury from about a week ago, and I don’t have any pain from that. So I think whatever it is, I’m thinking potentially a fentanyl derivative or something, but — 

Tim Ferriss: Yikes, that’s terrifying.

Dominic D’Agostino: My wife does not drink, she doesn’t use any drugs, so she was pretty much really floored by this.

Tim Ferriss: Wow. Did you go back and buy some more of them to send off to get analyzed?

Dominic D’Agostino: Well, I have it. Yeah. So I collected my urine, my wife collected her urine, and then I’m doing the necessary blood work, and I’ve contacted a forensic lab, and we have doctors involved in all this now.

Tim Ferriss: Wow. Dosed the wrong guy. Or the right guy, because you imagine like what if that had been a 80-year-old woman sleeping on the second floor. I mean, that’s dangerous.

Dominic D’Agostino: Absolutely. Yep, absolutely. I just took two and I’m a pretty big guy and everything, but if a little kid took two or four or five — so obviously, I don’t know, the company, and the company you can find it on Amazon, mixed it up and it’s laced with something or they just put high concentration THC and I kind of know what, but this is, we’re talking 48 hours later and I’m still feeling it.

Tim Ferriss: That’s wild.

Dominic D’Agostino: I’m super curious with my blood work, so I’m waiting for that to come in. Be careful, people out there because — 

Tim Ferriss: Be careful of those gummies, folks.

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. Not regulated.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. Dom, is there anything else you would like to mention or anywhere you’d like to point people before we wind this to a close?

Dominic D’Agostino: I don’t think so. I mean, we talked a lot about like sardine fasting and everything, I think, before.

Tim Ferriss: In the prior conversation, yeah.

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah, yeah. I’d like to credit to Dr. Annette Bosworth, Dr. Boz, because, I mean, I’ve kind of came up with this idea, but it got traction, and I think she has — a lot of people that email me about sardine fasting heard it from Dr. Boz, and she’s amplified the message with millions of YouTube followers. But she kind of took an idea and actually put it into practice and amplified it through a lot of people, and then those people emailed me about it, so that amplified and secured my knowledge. “Yes, okay, these benefits are…” And now she’s been on like Diary of a CEO podcast, I think, and some other podcasts.

So I’d also like to mention, I’m testing today even, there’s a company coming out, I don’t know if I can mention or not, but I will, Medifoodz. And for years, there’s no whole food-based ketogenic diet prescription foods. So I have no association with the company, I’m just testing their product, but they’re called Medifoodz. And

Tim Ferriss: How do you spell that? M-E-T-I? M-E-T — 

Dominic D’Agostino: M-E-D-I-F-O-O-

Tim Ferriss: Oh, Medi. I got it. Medifoodz.

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah, Medifoodz. With a Z. And I got to tell you, these are like gourmet foods, and then they hit the macros of a modified ketogenic diet. And we talked about if someone says the ketogenic diet is not palatable, they have to see these foods. They’re prescription whole food. There’s other companies that tried to do this, and they even got like the packaging is like compostable, like it looks like plastic, but I could throw it in my garden and it breaks down. I’m very impressed with this. I just mentioned that because I just got these foods yesterday and I was really impressed, but other companies have not been so impressive. So Medifoodz is pretty impressive. And Quest Nutrition tried to do this a while back and I think their foods were good, but they got a new CEO and just phased it out.

But I like the idea of a prescription, whole food, ketogenic diet that potentially a doctor could write a prescription. And a week of foods could be sent to the patients. I’ve been questioning why someone has not done this, but I know the margins are very small in the food world, so it’s hard to kind of get that up and running. 

Tim Ferriss: I mean, they could take the approach that a lot of companies take, a lot of tech startups take, like Uber, Tesla, et cetera, you sell in the beginning for much higher price to people who are willing to pay that. You use that to subsidize the R&D or the scale necessary to then offer, right? Instead of Uber Black, you have UberX, and similarly for a lot of companies. I mean, I would pay for this, right? And yeah, I wouldn’t say totally price-insensitive, but I’m willing to pay for convenience because there does come a point where I’ve had enough canned mackerel and salads with rib eye that I would love to have something else in any case. So I will check out Medifoodz.

Let’s see. Dom, are you active on social anywhere? Should people find you anywhere online?

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah, I’m not too active, but I try to jump on about once or twice a week, and I cap my social to maybe an hour a week.

Tim Ferriss: Yep. Smart man.

Dominic D’Agostino: I try to respond back to things, yeah. Kind of delete the apps from my phone or some of them, but I repost things and try to acknowledge some questions and stuff people have on this, and then I collect questions and then — we have our own podcast, the Metabolic Link Podcast. And we have a Metabolic Initiative Platform which has ACCME accreditation, so it’s like you can get CME credits from it. So that has been a project that we’re working on and trying to advance everything we’re talking about into human application through that.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. Beautiful. Well, I’m trying to think of any other links. Are there any other links that you want to mention? And we’ll stick these all in the show notes as well for people.

Dominic D’Agostino: Yeah. Ketonutrition.org. No products. I don’t sell anything. So ketonutrition.org information website, the Metabolic Link Podcast, and the Metabolic Health Initiative Education Platform are like the three biggies, I think.

Tim Ferriss: Beautiful. We will link to all those things for people listening as well as — God save — People who help me do the show notes, they’re going to have a lot to dig through, but we will link to everything that we can find a link for at tim.blog/podcast. Just search Dominic, and this will be the most recent episode. I mean, we may have some in the future, so you’ll find it.

And Dom, thank you so much for taking the time, man. Always great to see you.

Dominic D’Agostino: My pleasure. Thank you, Tim, for having me. Appreciate it. Good seeing you.Tim Ferriss: Yeah. And everybody, as per always, thanks for tuning in, and until next time, be just a bit kinder to others and also to yourself, especially if you might be self-flagellating yourself over not hitting your GKIs, like yours truly. All right. Take care, everybody.


DUE TO SOME HEADACHES IN THE PAST, PLEASE NOTE LEGAL CONDITIONS:

Tim Ferriss owns the copyright in and to all content in and transcripts of The Tim Ferriss Show podcast, with all rights reserved, as well as his right of publicity.

WHAT YOU’RE WELCOME TO DO: You are welcome to share the below transcript (up to 500 words but not more) in media articles (e.g., The New York Times, LA Times, The Guardian), on your personal website, in a non-commercial article or blog post (e.g., Medium), and/or on a personal social media account for non-commercial purposes, provided that you include attribution to “The Tim Ferriss Show” and link back to the tim.blog/podcast URL. For the sake of clarity, media outlets with advertising models are permitted to use excerpts from the transcript per the above.

WHAT IS NOT ALLOWED: No one is authorized to copy any portion of the podcast content or use Tim Ferriss’ name, image or likeness for any commercial purpose or use, including without limitation inclusion in any books, e-books, book summaries or synopses, or on a commercial website or social media site (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.) that offers or promotes your or another’s products or services. For the sake of clarity, media outlets are permitted to use photos of Tim Ferriss from the media room on tim.blog or (obviously) license photos of Tim Ferriss from Getty Images, etc.

The post The Tim Ferriss Show Transcripts: How to Use Ketosis for Enhanced Mood, Cognition, and Long-Term Brain Protection — A Practical and Tactical Guide with Dr. Dominic D’Agostino (Plus: Deconstructing Tim’s Latest Keto Experiment) (#845) appeared first on The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss.

How to Use Ketosis for Enhanced Mood, Cognition, and Long-Term Brain Protection — A Practical and Tactical Guide with Dr. Dominic D’Agostino (Plus: Deconstructing Tim’s Latest Keto Experiment) (#845)

2026-01-07 08:10:19

Dr. Dominic D’Agostino (@DominicDAgosti2) is a tenured associate professor in the Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Physiology at the University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine and a Visiting Senior Research Scientist at the Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.

He teaches medical neuroscience, physiology, nutrition, and neuropharmacology, and his research focuses on the development and testing of nutritional strategies and metabolic-based therapies for neurological disorders, cancer, and human performance optimization. His work spans both basic science and human clinical trials.

He has a strong personal interest in environmental medicine and enhancing the safety and resilience of military personnel and astronauts. In this capacity, he served as a research investigator and crew member on NASA’s Extreme Environment Mission Operations. His research has been supported by the Office of Naval Research, the Department of Defense, the National Institutes of Health, private organizations, and nonprofit foundations.

He earned his B.S. in Nutritional Science and Biological Sciences from Rutgers University in 1998, followed by a predoctoral fellowship in Neuroscience and Physiology at Rutgers and the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. He then completed postdoctoral training in Neuroscience at Wright State University’s Boonshoft School of Medicine in 2004 and at the University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine in 2006.

Please enjoy!

This episode is brought to you by:

How to Use Ketosis for Enhanced Mood, Cognition, and Long-Term Brain Protection — A Practical and Tactical Guide with Dr. Dominic D'Agostino (Plus: Deconstructing Tim’s Latest Keto Experiment)

Additional podcast platforms

Listen to this episode on Apple PodcastsSpotifyOvercastPodcast AddictPocket CastsCastboxYouTube MusicAmazon MusicAudible, or on your favorite podcast platform.


Transcripts

SELECTED LINKS FROM THE EPISODE

  • Connect with Dominic D’Agostino:

KetoNutrition.org | Facebook | Twitter | University of South Florida

Dr. Dominic D’Agostino’s Past Appearances

Devices & Wearables

Products, Brands, & Services

Books

Lab Tests, Biomarkers, & Metrics

Supplements, Compounds, and Terms

People

Organizations & Institutions

TIMESTAMPS

  • [00:00:00] Start.
  • [00:04:37] Ketosis benefits: Quieting the mind, GABA elevation, metabolic psychiatry.
  • [00:09:24] My Lyme disease story: Pseudo-dementia reversed in 3-4 days of ketosis.
  • [00:13:50] Spirochetes are glycolytic: Starve the bug, boost the immune response.
  • [00:19:20] Ketosis and cancer: Slowing glycolytic tumors, enhancing standard care.
  • [00:20:50] My 18-day keto experiment: Mood stabilization, Alzheimer’s prevention hopes.
  • [00:23:19] Metabolic memory: Carryover effects and Valter Longo’s fasting mimicking research.
  • [00:27:11] Intermittent fasting as keto on-ramp: My 2-8 p.m. eating window.
  • [00:29:15] Dom’s budget keto meal: Canned mackerel, MCT oil, apple cider vinegar.
  • [00:33:28] My ketone measurement paradox: Feeling sharp at 0.2 mM readings.
  • [00:36:56] The carburetor analogy: Ketone production vs. utilization explained.
  • [00:38:43] Breath ketones vs. blood ketones: Better indicator in caloric deficit.
  • [00:39:47] Gluconeogenesis fears: Fat, fiber, and salt to slow protein absorption.
  • [00:45:25] The bunless double cheeseburger question: 80 grams of protein in one sitting.
  • [00:49:03] Post-meal walking and GLUT4 activation: Timing your glucose disposal.
  • [00:51:02] CGM and ketone monitor limitations: When your devices gaslight you.
  • [00:58:05] Rabbit starvation and protein-veggie days: Why your body won’t bankroll its own ketosis.
  • [01:05:44] Alzheimer’s prevention: Biomarkers, B12, hsCRP, and metabolic health.
  • [01:09:40] My family history: Letrozole, metabolic dysfunction, and rapid cognitive decline.
  • [01:13:17] Minimum effective dose: 80% of benefits from low-carb Mediterranean.
  • [01:18:56] One week per month protocol: Aggressive calorie cut to ramp ketones.
  • [01:23:12] GKI sweet spot: Target 1-4, aim for 1-2 during intensive weeks.
  • [01:36:22] Exogenous ketones 101: Palatability, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, toxicity.
  • [01:39:21] 1,3-Butanediol warnings: Liver toxicity, NAD depletion, dependency risk.
  • [01:54:22] Intermittent fasting vs. ketogenic breakfast.
  • [01:59:09] My accidental intoxication story.
  • [02:03:23] Dr. Veech tribute: Student of Hans Krebs, ketone ester pioneer.
  • [02:05:08] Fiber on keto: Wild blueberries, broccoli, apples, walnuts.
  • [02:09:58] The tainted gummies incident: Dom’s forensic investigation underway.
  • [02:13:08] Thanks to Dr. Boz and Medifoodz.
  • [02:16:19] Parting thoughts.

DOMINIC D’AGOSTINO QUOTES FROM THE INTERVIEW

“We know that being in a state of ketosis really quiets the mind, … and that, I think, really echoes its broad application for metabolic psychiatry, which is everything from major depression to bipolar to schizophrenia to anxiety disorders to anorexia nervosa.”
— Dominic D’Agostino

“Much like muscle memory, I think there’s a metabolic memory. So the more you stay in ketosis, the easier it gets and the more benefits you derive from it and the more that you shift your body to being more fat adapted—just like you can build your VO2.”
— Dominic D’Agostino

“[The ketogenic diet] is not a cure for cancer, and I cringe when people talk about that online. [But] it does slow it down, especially if it’s highly glycolytic, which 80% of cancers are.”
— Dominic D’Agostino

“I think you can get 80% of the benefits [of ketosis] with a low-carb diet—low-carb meaning 100 grams a day, just fibrous, non-starch, non-sugar carbs, low-carb Mediterranean, if you want to call it that.”
— Dominic D’Agostino

“Resistance exercise—I’m a little biased towards that. But muscle is like an endocrine organ that produces hormones and various molecules that are neuroprotective, and muscle is tightly linked to brain size and, of course, your waist and your visceral fat.”
— Dominic D’Agostino

“My concern … is that I know there’s older people out there with dementia, perhaps Alzheimer’s disease, that if they’re consuming 1,3-Butanediol as a ketogenic supplement, it’s going to make you dizzy. It’s going to decrease your stability, it’s going to make you potentially fall, break your hip.”
— Dominic D’Agostino

Podcasts & Media

Relevant Resources


This episode is brought to you by Seed’s DS-01 Daily SynbioticSeed’s DS-01 was recommended to me more than a year ago by a PhD microbiologist, so I started using it well before their team ever reached out to me. After incorporating two capsules of Seed’s DS-01 into my morning routine, I have noticed improved digestion, skin tone, and overall health. It’s a 2-in-1 probiotic and prebiotic formulated with 24 clinically and scientifically studied strains that have systemic benefits in and beyond the gut. And now, you can get 20% off your first month of DS-01 with code 20TIM.


This episode is brought to you by Gusto! If you’re a small business owner looking to simplify payroll and HR tasks, Gusto could be the game-changer you need. Gusto is an all-in-one payroll, benefits, and HR platform designed specifically for small businesses. Gusto automatically files federal, state, and local payroll taxes, handles W-2s and 1099s, and offers straightforward health benefits and 401(k) options for nearly any budget. With an intuitive interface and features like time tracking, onboarding tools, and direct access to certified HR experts, Gusto saves time and eliminates headaches so you can focus on what matters—growing your business. ​As a special offer to listeners, new customers get Gusto free for their first 3 months. This is the perfect time to choose Gusto to take care of your team and stay compliant. See for yourself why 9 out of 10 businesses recommend it. Get started now! Terms apply at Gusto.com/terms.


This episode is brought to you by David Protein Bars! I’m always on the hunt for protein sources that don’t require sacrifices in taste or nutrition. That’s why I love the protein bars from David. With David protein bars, you get the fewest calories for the most protein, ever. David has 28g of protein, 150 calories, and 0g of sugar. Their bars come in six delicious flavors, all worth trying, and I’ll often throw them in my bag for protein on the go. And now, listeners of The Tim Ferriss Show who buy four boxes get a fifth box for free. Try them for yourself at DavidProtein.com/Tim.


Want to hear the last time Dominic D’Agostino was on the podcast? Listen to our conversation here, in which we discussed ketones and neuroprotection, sardine fasting, glucose ketone index for autophagy tracking, cholesterol hyperabsorption, melatonin myths, metabolic psychiatry, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, metformin versus berberine, and much more.

The post How to Use Ketosis for Enhanced Mood, Cognition, and Long-Term Brain Protection — A Practical and Tactical Guide with Dr. Dominic D’Agostino (Plus: Deconstructing Tim’s Latest Keto Experiment) (#845) appeared first on The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss.

The Single Decision

2026-01-03 05:12:41

Coach Sommer​ is a former U.S. National Team gymnastics coach and the creator of ​GymnasticBodies​. This personal email sent to me, which I reread often, was so good that I had to include it in Tools of Titans. Make the one big decision.

Enter Coach Sommer…

Hi Tim,

Patience. Far too soon to expect strength improvements. Strength improvements [for a movement like this] take a minimum of 6 weeks. Any perceived improvements prior to that are simply the result of improved synaptic facilitation. In plain English, the central nervous system simply became more efficient at that particular movement with practice. This is, however, not to be confused with actual strength gains.

Dealing with the temporary frustration of not making progress is an integral part of the path towards excellence. In fact, it is essential and something that every single elite athlete has had to learn to deal with. If the pursuit of excellence was easy, everyone would do it.

In fact, this impatience in dealing with frustration is the primary reason that most people fail to achieve their goals. Unreasonable expectations timewise, resulting in unnecessary frustration, due to a perceived feeling of failure. Achieving the extraordinary is not a linear process.

The secret is to show up, do the work, and go home.

A blue collar work ethic married to indomitable will. It is literally that simple. Nothing interferes. Nothing can sway you from your purpose. Once the decision is made, simply refuse to budge. Refuse to compromise.

And accept that quality long-term results require quality long-term focus. No emotion. No drama. No beating yourself up over small bumps in the road. Learn to enjoy and appreciate the process. This is especially important because you are going to spend far more time on the actual journey than with those all too brief moments of triumph at the end.

Certainly celebrate the moments of triumph when they occur. More importantly, learn from defeats when they happen. In fact, if you are not encountering defeat on a fairly regular basis, you are not trying hard enough. And absolutely refuse to accept less than your best.

Throw out a timeline. It will take what it takes.

If the commitment is to a long-term goal and not to a series of smaller intermediate goals, then only one decision needs to be made and adhered to. Clear, simple, straightforward. Much easier to maintain than having to make small decision after small decision to stay the course when dealing with each step along the way. This provides far too many opportunities to inadvertently drift from your chosen goal. The single decision is one of the most powerful tools in the toolbox.

The post The Single Decision appeared first on The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss.

The Story Behind EpiPen, The Rise of Food Allergies, and What Doctors Got Wrong (#842)

2025-12-31 07:01:53

This time around, we have an experimental format, featuring the first episode of a brand-new podcast launching next week, Drug StoryI rarely feature episodes from other shows, but I think this one is well worth your time. It changed how I think about allergies, especially as someone who carries an EpiPen and has wondered: why on earth have food allergies seemed to skyrocket in the last few decades?

Drug Story is a podcast that tells the story of the disease business, one drug at a time. Each episode explores one disease and one drug, and it kicks off with EpiPen and food allergies. A quick teaser: What if I told you that a well-meaning medical recommendation may have caused millions of kids to develop food allergies?

Make sure to subscribe to Drug Story on Apple PodcastsSpotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. You can also simply go to DrugStory.co to learn more.

The host is Thomas Goetz. He is a senior impact fellow at the University of California Berkeley School of Public Health, and much earlier, Thomas was the executive editor at WIRED, which he led to a dozen National Magazine Awards from 2001 to 2013. His writing has been repeatedly selected for the Best American Science Writing and Best Technology Writing anthologies.

P.S. To help you kick off 2026, I recommend checking out Henry Shukman, a past podcast guest and one of the few in the world authorized to teach Sanbo Zen. Henry’s app, The Way, has changed my life. I’ve been using it daily, often twice a day, and it’s lowered my anxiety more than I thought possible. For 30 free sessions, just visit thewayapp.com/Tim. No credit card required.

Please enjoy!

The Story Behind EpiPen, The Rise of Food Allergies, and What Doctors Got Wrong

The post The Story Behind EpiPen, The Rise of Food Allergies, and What Doctors Got Wrong (#842) appeared first on The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss.

Forget New Year’s Resolutions and Conduct a ‘Past Year Review’ Instead (#559)

2025-12-26 20:00:00

Im often asked about how I approach New Year’s resolutions. The truth is that I no longer approach them at all, even though I did for decades. Why the change? I have found “past year reviews” (PYR) more informed, valuable, and actionable than half-blindly looking forward with broad resolutions. I did my first PYR after a mentor’s young daughter died of cancer on December 31st, eight years ago, and I’ve done it every year since. Her passing was a somber reminder that our days here are too precious not to fill them with the people and activities that nourish us most. The PYR takes just 30–60 minutes and looks like this:

  1. Grab a notepad and create two columns: POSITIVE and NEGATIVE.
  2. Go through your calendar from the last year, looking at every week.
  3. For each week, jot down on the pad any people or activities or commitments that triggered peak positive or negative emotions for that month. Put them in their respective columns.
  4. Once you’ve gone through the past year, look at your notepad list and ask, “What 20% of each column produced the most reliable or powerful peaks?”
  5. Based on the answers, take your “positive” leaders and schedule more of them in the new year. Get them on the calendar now! Book things with friends and prepay for activities/events/commitments that you know work. It’s not real until it’s in the calendar. That’s step one. Step two is to take your “negative” leaders, put “NOT-TO-DO LIST” at the top, and put them somewhere you can see them each morning for the first few weeks of 2026. These are the people and things you *know* make you miserable, so don’t put them on your calendar out of obligation, guilt, FOMO, or other nonsense.

That’s it! If you try it, let me know how it goes.

And just remember: it’s not enough to remove the negative. That simply creates a void. Get the positive things on the calendar ASAP, lest they get crowded out by the bullshit and noise that will otherwise fill your days.

Good luck and godspeed, everyone!

###

If you prefer to listen to the audio version of this blog post, you can find the audio on The Tim Ferriss Show podcast:

#559: Forget New Year’s Resolutions and Conduct a ‘Past Year Review’ Instead

Listen to the episode on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Overcast, Podcast Addict, Pocket Casts, Castbox, Amazon Musicor on your favorite podcast platform.

The post Forget New Year’s Resolutions and Conduct a ‘Past Year Review’ Instead (#559) appeared first on The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss.

The Tim Ferriss Show Transcripts: Arthur Brooks — Finding The Meaning of Your Life, The Poet’s Protocol, The Holy Half-Hour, and Why Your Suffering is Sacred (#841)

2025-12-25 01:51:19

Please enjoy this transcript of my interview with Arthur Brooks (@arthurbrooks), a professor at the Harvard Kennedy School and the Harvard Business School, where he teaches courses on leadership and happiness.

Full bio

Products, resources, and people mentioned in the interview

Legal conditions/copyright information

Arthur Brooks — Finding The Meaning of Your Life, The Poet's Protocol, The Holy Half-Hour, and Why Your Suffering is Sacred

Additional podcast platforms

Listen to this episode on Apple PodcastsSpotifyOvercastPodcast AddictPocket CastsCastboxYouTube MusicAmazon MusicAudible, or on your favorite podcast platform.


Transcripts may contain a few typos. With many episodes lasting 2+ hours, it can be difficult to catch minor errors. Enjoy!


Tim Ferriss: Arthur Brooks, we meet again.

Arthur C. Brooks: Nice to see you, Tim.

Tim Ferriss: Nice to see you. Glad to see the vascularity in your arms is still visible even through the long sleeve shirt.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah. Because every woman wants a vascular man.

Tim Ferriss: You know, I only take my cues from the internet.

Arthur C. Brooks: Exactly. My wife, every day, she says, “I love you. You’re so vascular.”

Tim Ferriss: I could really take this a lot of directions, but I’m going to take a hard left from vascularity, and I’m going to try to pronounce — Brahma Murta?

Arthur C. Brooks: Brahma Muhurta.

Tim Ferriss: Okay. Brahma Muhurta. And the reason I’m bringing this up is because I want to offer some candy, much like maybe an E.T., putting the Reese’s little pieces on the floor to lure E.T. out. I want to bring my listeners and diehards into the conversation with a morning routine. And we’ll talk about evening routines at the end as bookmarks, and then we’re going to dive into all sorts of stuff. But what is Brahma Muhurta, and could you describe your personal morning routine?

Arthur C. Brooks: I do have a very strong and very disciplined morning routine. And I studied love and happiness. So it’s not as if I’m going deep into the physiology of actually how I can have the best amount of muscle mass and minimum amount of body fat. I want to have more love and happiness in my life, and it’s not easy. So I’m a specialist in human happiness because it’s hard for me. And that’s the first thing to — I know everybody who does research on happiness in the psychology, behavioral science world, they’re doing it for a reason.

It’s sort of “me-search” more than research. But one of the things that I’ve found is that discipline and an understanding of your own human physiology, the biology and neuroscience, is critical for actually becoming a happier person. I have a morning routine that I dedicate to being both more productive and having higher wellbeing. I’m managing mood, because high negative affect is characteristic of my personality, and I also need to be really productive, because the morning hours are when you’re most productive, especially in creative stuff. Almost everybody experiences this.

And that starts with what you just mentioned, which is called the Brahma Muhurta. And I’ve studied a lot in India. I go to India every year. I have spiritual teachers, but also, I’m very interested in behavioral science in the Vedic tradition. They came to a lot of truths way before Western social science actually came upon this, and one of the ideas was Brahma Muhurta, which in Sanskrit means the creator’s time.

Now, a Muhurta is 48 minutes long. So two Muhurtas, the Brahma Muhurta, is an hour and 36 minutes before dawn. And the whole idea, going back thousands of years, is you get up an hour and 36 minutes before dawn and you’ll be more creative, more in touch with the divine, more productive and happier.

This was always the contention. So of course, it’s been put to the test in modern behavioral science research, and sure enough. And we don’t know if it’s two Muhurtas is the right number of Muhurtas, but the whole point is, getting up before dawn has incredible impacts on productivity, focus, concentration, and happiness. If you’re getting up when the sun is warm, you’ve lost the first battle for mood management and productivity is what it comes down to. So my days always start before dawn. Now, I usually set the clock for 4:30 in the morning, which is a lot before dawn in — 

Tim Ferriss: Who knew that Jocko Willink was such a fan of Vedic traditions? He also wakes up at 4:30. Please continue.

Arthur C. Brooks: 4:30 is a good time for a lot of different reasons. You try to retrofit your schedule the way you need to do, for sure. And that’s a long time before dawn in the winter, and not that long before dawn in the summer. And our listeners in Helsinki are like, “What do I do in July?” I mean, okay, you have to tailor the routines to what you’re doing, but it’s very clear that this is good for productivity and very good for happiness. And then the most important thing is what do you do right after that?

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. What do you do?

Arthur C. Brooks: I pick up heavy things and run around.

Tim Ferriss: What does it look like?

Arthur C. Brooks: Well, the most important room in my house is the gym. And I’ve always had a good gym in my house, down in the basement of my house. Now, down in the basement of my house is also living one of my kids and his wife and their two sons, so I have to be real quiet.

Tim Ferriss: So lift heavy things that are quiet.

Arthur C. Brooks: I can’t be clanking around down there, because I’m like, I don’t want to wake up my grandchildren. But I do, generally speaking, two-thirds resistance, one-third Zone 2, but I tailor that to what my day is going to look like. So if I have a sedentary day, I’ll do more Zone 2 to start the day. And if I know I’m walking around, I’m walking around campus or whatever I have to do, I know I’m going to be walking seven or 10 miles that day, I’ll do all resistance. And so that really depends. Or if I’m going on a hike with my wife on Saturday or something. But that’s seven days a week. I do an hour in the gym seven days a week.

Tim Ferriss: What would the, let’s just say, prototypical two-thirds resistance, one-third Zone 2, or whatever the ratio might look like as a template, what would that look like? What type of exercises? Free weights, equipment, kettlebells? What type of Zone 2 do you like? Because for instance, like with Zone 2, it’s like, I travel a lot. Stationary bikes can be a real hassle because of the fitting.

Arthur C. Brooks: Right.

Tim Ferriss: But then, all right, maybe you use a treadmill with an incline with a rucksack or something like that. I’d just love to know the specifics.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah, for sure. I’m very old school. And my resistance training, actually, I learned the routines that I do when I was in my 30s. I really started lifting when I was in my 30s. And my dad died and I changed a lot of the things in my life. I quit drinking alcohol in my 30s, and I did a lot of things differently than I hadn’t done before, because I wanted to not have the future that I saw in the windshield of my life.

And one of the things that I did was, I started getting serious about my fitness and going to the gym. And I thought to myself, what’s my goal? My goal is not to turn into a statue and be admired. I mean, I’d been married for a long time at that point. I mean, that was sort of done. And besides, my wife doesn’t care. She just wants me to be happy and healthy.

I wanted to be doing that in my 70s. I wanted to be healthy in my 70s. I wanted to be hanging out with my wife and dandling my 11th grandchild on my knee when I was 78 years old. So what I did was, I’ve always been on tour. I’ve always traveled constantly all throughout my career. Every city I’d go to, I’d find the oldest iron gym I could find. Why? Because that’s where the old dudes train. That’s where the shredded guys train. And now I’m the old guy. So my wife says that sleeping with me is like holding a leather sack of ropes, which I think is a compliment. I’m not sure. But I’ve been married decades, Tim, decades. But I would go to these iron gyms — 

Tim Ferriss: It’s better than a leather sack of lard, right?

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah, for sure. For sure. It’s like, ropes. And so, I’d go to these gyms for 78-year-old guys who are completely shredded. They look like old roosters. And they’re working out, and I would say, “Teach me. Teach me, maestro, sensei. Teach me what you do.” And they would give me this advice, and I followed that advice assiduously. And so what it is is, I’m old school. Push, pull, legs. Don’t use a bar.

Tim Ferriss: And is it push, pull, legs every workout?

Arthur C. Brooks: No, it’s push, pull, legs on different days.

Tim Ferriss: Got it.

Arthur C. Brooks: So it’s not a pure bro split, but it’s near on. Making sure that you’re not getting heroic with the amount of weight. You’re making sure that you’re using dumbbells and not bars, because you can get full range of motion, but you’re super careful about your joints. If you have any pain in your joints, you back off. You do, for volume, you do more reps as opposed to more weight, and always be doing it that way, and dial it down, the actual weight, dialing up the reps as you get older.

And these are these basic ideas. So it’s push, pull, legs. And then I’m doing usually somewhere between 20 minutes and 40 minutes of Zone 2 cardio, which I have an elliptical machine, because it’s super easy on the joints. And every place, every hotel’s got an elliptical machine. I’ve got a nice elliptical machine at home, and that’s what I’m doing.

And this is an hour. A lot of the time I’m doing it without headphones. It’s important because you need to concentrate for — to begin with, that’s your most creative time. That’s like taking an hour-long shower. You get your best ideas if you work out without headphones. There’s a lot of good neuroscience on that, as well. And that’s 4:45 to 5:45 in the morning every single day. That’s the one thing I can really count on that’s always going to be good. Always going to be good.

Tim Ferriss: Do you record your workouts?

Arthur C. Brooks: Like, videotape my workouts?

Tim Ferriss: No. In any type of workout journal, or is it so intuitive at this point that you’re like, I really know, since I’m using dumbbells and dumbbells should be consistent from place to place.

Arthur C. Brooks: I can tell you what I did on this day in 2001.

Tim Ferriss: Meaning you remember it?

Arthur C. Brooks: No. Meaning it’s written down.

Tim Ferriss: Okay. It’s like, wait a sec.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah, no, no, no. I’m not.

Tim Ferriss: There’s some people who are like that.

Arthur C. Brooks: Some sort of a Rain Man deal? Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: Well, for instance, people you wouldn’t expect. Arnold Schwarzenegger loves chess, and when I first interviewed him, I was talking to his right hand man and he said, “Oh, he plays chess daily with X number of people over the course of a week or two, and he keeps track of every game and every score in his head.”

Arthur C. Brooks: That’s amazing. So no, I’m not doing that, but I can tell you, I mean, I have journals that go back. I write it down. And so, I know what’s on what day and what I did. There’s a whole lot of things that I keep records of, for sure, just so I understand my own progress in life, making sure I’m not making regress in life. And for some reason, I got into the pattern of writing down every single workout going back until, back to my 30s.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, I’m the same.

Arthur C. Brooks: And now I’m 61 years old. So that’s a lot of date books.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, I have workouts going back to 16, and I still have all them.

Arthur C. Brooks: Just to keep them.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. I don’t know why I keep them, but I have them.

Arthur C. Brooks: I can tell you behaviorally why people do that. I mean, what you want is record of progress, because that’s one of the great secrets to human happiness. You never arrive. Arrival gives you almost nothing, but it’s progress toward the goal. And this is a record of Tim’s progress going all the way back to 16. It’s evidence that you’re a better man than when you were 16 years old. Let’s hope.

Tim Ferriss: Certainly not as strong as I was when I was in my 20s, but still Zone 2.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah. Not dying.

Tim Ferriss: Things like this.

Arthur C. Brooks: No, it’s fantastic. And it’s really a great way to start the day, and there’s a lot of research, once again, on this is especially important for mood management. So half of the population is above average in negative affect. Negative affect is strong negative manifestation of mood. And obviously, if it’s the median, half has to be above that and half has to be below. And I’m way above average in negative affect.I’m above average in positive affect, too.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, me too.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah. I mean, you’re a mad scientist, which is typically — 

Tim Ferriss: I’m a poet. We talked about this last time.

Arthur C. Brooks: Oh, we did this. You are a poet. So you’re below average positive.

Tim Ferriss: Below average positive. High peak negative.

Arthur C. Brooks: High peak negative. So I’m at the 90th percentile in negative mood. And there are ways, typical ways that people self-manage negative mood that are really, really bad for you, like drugs and alcohol, like internet use, like pornography. Horrible negative mood management. Workaholism, awful. People distract themselves because the amygdala of the brain is what largely manages fear and anger, but the amygdala also manages attention. And so if you can distract yourself with something you can count on, like your work, what you’re effectively doing is you’re managing your anger and fear by redirecting the activity of the amygdala.

Tim Ferriss: Sounds right. Checks out.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah, but there’s good ways to do it, like you’re working, like developing your spirituality and picking up heavy things and running around.

Tim Ferriss: So we’re going to stick on the heavy things for a second here, as well as the elliptical.

Arthur C. Brooks: Because we’re not even done with that.

Tim Ferriss: We’re not even done. So we have the waking early, let’s call it 4:30. For me, early, 7:30 this morning, I was very pleased with myself after arriving from travel at close to midnight.

Arthur C. Brooks: Hey, that’s 4:30 on the West Coast.

Tim Ferriss: Exactly, exactly. It’s 4:30 somewhere. And we’ve covered that briefly. For Zone 2, are you wearing a heart rate monitor? Are you doing the talk test? How are you tracking?

Arthur C. Brooks: Talk test.

Tim Ferriss: Talk test.

Arthur C. Brooks: It’s a talk test. It’s just keeping it as simple as possible. I tend to go insane if I’m over-measured. And so, that’s one of the reasons I use very, very simple biometrics and very simple health monitoring. I’m going to need to move up to something better at some point, but if I get too much data, I’m in trouble.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. I mean, it’s like having seven different drafts of a piece of writing you’re working on. Now what do you do? I mean, in a sense, there’s data, and then there’s information which you need to analyze. So there is a point of diminishing returns. 

PREROLL

Tim Ferriss: Talk test, for people, just very briefly. Peter Attia has videos on this of himself on a stationary bike, demonstrating it on social media if you want to try to find them. But in effect, and please tell me if I’m off base with you approach it, you are able to, while you’re in this Zone 2 on, say, an elliptical, stationary bike, treadmill, you’re able to speak or have a conversation with very short sentences, but you don’t really want to.

Arthur C. Brooks: Right. That’s exactly right. Zone 3, you’re too out of breath to have a normal conversation. Zone 4, you’re gasping for air. So I mean, Zone 1 is just, you’re strolling, is kind of what it comes down to. And your heart rate to be in the Zone 2 is usually around 120 beats per minute. And I’ll also do some periods of some intervals in that. I’ll do two or three intervals during a half hour Zone 2 cardio session. So I’ll take it up to 160 beats per minute for a full minute, then bring it back. I’ll do some of that HIIT training while I’m doing it. But 120 beats per minute is a really, really easy thing to ascertain, because I’m an old musician. That’s the speed of a Sousa march.

Tim Ferriss: A what?

Arthur C. Brooks: A Sousa march. That’s 120 beats per minute. That’s how you know.

Tim Ferriss: I mean, when you put out your elliptical e-course, I think this is the lead in-music.

Arthur C. Brooks: It’s my bump music, man.

Tim Ferriss: All right. Actually, before we get to after the exercise, for folks who might be interested in really diving into this, number one, Peter has a lot on it. Number two, if you want to get nerdy, the Morpheus device has been recommended to me by folks like Andy Galpin and others. There are other options, but that seems to be a pretty good device. So in terms of developing, if you’re not a former French horn player, the intuition of what is 120 or 130 beats per minute, you can do, much like I’ve already done with, say, glucose readings or ketone readings, I know where I am, but I’m not yet there with heart rate. The Morpheus is a nice tool for learning what it feels like to be at 120, versus 130, versus whatever it might be.

All right, you have your workout. After the workout, what is your morning routine?

Arthur C. Brooks: I get cleaned up, then I go to mass. I’m a Catholic. I go to mass every day. And that’s the experience of transcendence, which, my path is not the only path, to say, “Everybody’s got to go to mass!” And that’s not going to be effective, because that’s not for everybody. But there is a period of reflection and transcendence that’s very, very important for not just mood management, for productivity that’s going to follow. And there’s a lot of neuroscience behind why that is effective.

But for me, it’s also an opportunity, because my wife gets up at six. And when I’m home — I’m home about half the time, I’m on tour, about half the time I’m home. But I’m home every week. So I don’t go on tour for months at a time. I go on tour for days at a time. Which means that I’ve always got a flight home and that’s inconvenient, but that’s actually part of my life protocols, is making sure I spend every single weekend at home. I’m out maybe four weekends a year. And so that means I have lots of days at home. I have at least three or four mornings at home, and we start the day at 6:30 mass, the two of us do. That’s very important for us.

Tim Ferriss: How long is mass?

Arthur C. Brooks: Half an hour.

Tim Ferriss: All right.

Arthur C. Brooks: Daily mass is half an hour. Sunday mass is an hour, but daily mass is half an hour. During the week, after 30 minutes, no souls are saved. According to science, no. So we do that, and that’s a period of prayer and reflection. Some people prefer Vipassana meditation. Our friend Ryan Holiday does a lot with actually studying the Stoic philosophers, but you need what the ancients would call the holy hour. And they would be a full hour. For me, it’s the holy half hour. And that really works. And it’s really good for my relationship, and it’s very good for, it’s incredibly good for focus and concentration.

Tim Ferriss: So I want to bookmark, just to give a shameless plug for our first conversation.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: For people who are like, “Oh, yeah, okay. Well, I didn’t grow up Catholic.” You didn’t grow up Catholic.

Arthur C. Brooks: I didn’t grow up Catholic.

Tim Ferriss: Your parents thought that your conversion was an act of youthful rebellion.

Arthur C. Brooks: Which it might’ve been.

Tim Ferriss: It might’ve been, but it stuck.

Arthur C. Brooks: Fair is fair.

Tim Ferriss: But it stuck.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: So if you want the backstory, including some wild stories, then listen to our first conversation.

Arthur C. Brooks: So I’m basically the equivalent of like a freaked out hippie who went to India and got converted and practiced an exotic religion for the rest of my life. But my exotic religion is Catholicism.

Tim Ferriss: I mean, depending on where you start, it’s pretty exotic.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah. Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: All right. So you have the holy half hour.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: I mean, our routines have a lot of similarities, although the flavors are slightly different. We could talk about that.

Arthur C. Brooks: Probably the neurophysiological effects are the same.

Tim Ferriss: Very, very similar, I would imagine. So after the holy half hour, what happens?

Arthur C. Brooks: After the holy half hour, now I’ve taken no nutrition except for salty water with some high dose, I take high dose creatine hydrate with my workout drink.

Tim Ferriss: What’s high dose?

Arthur C. Brooks: High dose for me is 15 to 20 grams a day.

Tim Ferriss: That is a lot. Okay.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah. So the first five is for muscle protein synthesis or volumization of muscles, which is really good for your workout. The other is for this just exploding area of research on the biological benefits of it, the neurobiological benefits of it. And for me, that’s really, really important, because I’m a crummy sleeper. And Rhonda Patrick has done a lot of stuff on how creatine is really good when you don’t sleep.

It’s also really good because I’m trying to bank, neurologically, four hours of concentration, and it’s mostly creativity. So I have to set myself up for optimal creativity, and that’s one of the best ways to do it. That’s the best supplement that I’ve been able to find that affects my creativity later on in the morning. So I’m adding that to my pre-workout drink. I’m taking no caffeine.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

Arthur C. Brooks: This is important. I don’t take any caffeine to wake up. Huberman’s right on this. And this is very contested in the literature, about A2A adenosine and how caffeine blocks adenosine receptors. But I really believe, and Huberman believes this, but I find this the most compelling explanation and it absolutely works for me. I don’t use caffeine to wake up. I use caffeine to focus. Because what I want is, I actually want circulating adenosine to metabolize and to clear endogenously. And I want lots and lots of clarity, plenty of open parking spots for the adenosine receptors, that I can then fill two to three hours after I wake up with caffeine. And this will give me, this is just modafinil. At this point, this is just vacuuming. This is going to vacuum — 

Tim Ferriss: Be careful with actual modafinil, kiddos.

Arthur C. Brooks: No, no, I know. I’m saying like that. So it’s vacuuming the dopamine into the prefrontal cortex. So what ADHD drugs do is that they keep more dopamine in the synapse, especially in the prefrontal cortex, such that you can focus, you have more concentration and you have more creativity. And caffeine is great for this. A lot of people like nicotine. I don’t like nicotine only because I was hopelessly addicted to cigarettes early on in my life. All the way through my 20s, I was a smoker, and I don’t want — I mean, I blew it.

Tim Ferriss: Well, a lot of people are step by step blowing it also, with first microdosing nicotine, and then lo and behold, since it’s sort of dance partners in addictive potential with heroin, then those micro doses become something along the line of mezzodoses, and then before you know it, you’re addicted to nicotine.

Arthur C. Brooks: Pretty soon it’s all nicotine, all the time.

Tim Ferriss: Exactly.

Arthur C. Brooks: And caffeine is highly addictive as well, but as a psychostimulant, it’s better studied. It’s much, much easier to self-manage. I get usually about 380 milligrams of caffeine.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, that’s decent.

Arthur C. Brooks: It’s decent.

Tim Ferriss: Holy cow. All right.

Arthur C. Brooks: That’s a venti dark roast from Starbucks. I grew up in Seattletown.

Tim Ferriss: I mean, 380. For a lot of people, if you have moderately strong coffee, that’s going to be almost four cups of coffee.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: That’s power.

Arthur C. Brooks: That’s 20 ounces of good — and again, the darker roasts have less caffeine, but I like them better because I grew up on the north side of Queen Ann Hill in Seattle when there was one Starbucks. And so I’ve been doing that since I was in eighth grade.

Tim Ferriss: All right. So you have the holy half hour.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: And then after the holy half hour, you haven’t had any caffeine up to that point.

Arthur C. Brooks: And now it’s 7:15 in the morning.

Tim Ferriss: All right.

Arthur C. Brooks: So I’m back from mass.

Tim Ferriss: Now what do you do?

Arthur C. Brooks: I brew the coffee.

Tim Ferriss: All right.

Arthur C. Brooks: And I know how to brew coffee.

Tim Ferriss: Now, do you have the 380 in a megadose, or is that titrated over time?

Arthur C. Brooks: No, that’s in a megadose that usually it takes me about 45 minutes to drink.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, my God.

Arthur C. Brooks: Half an hour to 45 minutes to drink. I know. Well, part of it is I’ve got this grizzled adrenal system. My HPA axis is like, it’s like a building falling down at this point.

Tim Ferriss: You just have to donkey kick your adrenals.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: Okay, got it. So then you brew the coffee and sit down to — 

Arthur C. Brooks: Then I make my first nutrition of the day. And the first nutrition of the day is 60 to 70 grams of protein. And protein is really important, especially with a tryptophan-rich source of protein for mood management. And I’m not going to eat, and I’m not eating a turkey leg or something like that. I’m not like Henry VIII for that. It’s mostly whey protein powder mixed in with non-fat, unflavored Greek yogurt, which is great. And there’s so many — and it’s like, anymore, I just read that the three most, the fastest growing foods in America today are cottage cheese, Greek yogurt, and whey protein powder. Which is extraordinary, extraordinary when you think about it. But you and I got to this much earlier, back when it was harder to find Greek yogurt. And I put a little artificial sweetener in it, because I’m not afraid of artificial sweetener. And I get more micronutrients in it with putting in walnuts and blueberries and things that actually give me the micronutrients that I need.

By the way, I’ve also taken a multivitamin at this point. I take a multivitamin everyday. I’ve been taking a multivitamin for decade after decade after decade. And there’s these papers that were coming out five years ago saying that they’re not only ineffective, they’re bad for you. That’s all been overtaken by events, and the newer research actually says it has neurocognitive protective benefits. Take your multivitamins. And there are a lot of ways to do it. Sometimes I’ll take a good multivitamin in the morning. Sometimes I wait later in the day and take AG1. But you need a good multivitamin. Almost everybody does.

Tim Ferriss: So a few — not persnickety, but detail questions, because that’s how my mind operates. Why no fat Greek yogurt instead of something with fat?

Arthur C. Brooks: And fat would be better for me, to be sure. It’s that the fat bothers my stomach. So just, I don’t like it. It fills me up too much. It’s hard to get to 65 grams of protein when you’ve got that much fat in the yogurt, because you’re just going to be just falling asleep. I only do that because it’s uncomfortable to have the fat.

Tim Ferriss: Got it. And I’ll add just a footnote for some people listening will say, wait a second, I thought you could only absorb 30 grams of protein at a sitting. That is not quite — 

Arthur C. Brooks: That’s old school research.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. It is somewhere between an old wives tale and just a statement that has been repeated so much that it’s taken to be true, but it’s not true.

Arthur C. Brooks: It’s not true.

Tim Ferriss: And in fact, there is, or I should say there are some data to suggest that as you get older, you actually absorb protein more effectively in a larger bolus, meaning more protein at fewer sittings.

Arthur C. Brooks: Right, that’s correct. And I’m completely persuaded by the research. And over the years, I’ve experimented a lot with that in my diet, just in the protocols of my eating. And what I’ve found over the past five years in particular is that I’m most comfortable, because I’m naturally genetically really lean. I’m most comfortable when I’m sub-10 body fat. 

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, me too. I’m kidding.

Arthur C. Brooks: But it’s just because of my genetics.

Tim Ferriss: I’ve been trying to get there since I was 14.

Arthur C. Brooks: Well, if the genetics don’t want it, then they’re going to go against it.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, I’ve got to battle dwarf genetics.

Arthur C. Brooks: No, man, if I had your frame, I mean, I would love that. I would be able to lift heavy. But the way to do that for me is to stay at 200 grams of protein a day. So to keep moderate calories in 200 grams of protein a day, and then I can keep my body fat where I want it, where I feel really good, and I’m never hungry. And that’s the way to do it, is a really protein-rich diet. And of course, now popular culture is catching up with what we’ve known scientifically for a pretty long time.

Tim Ferriss: So you get your colossus of caffeine that can follow the holy half hour, just to keep up with the narration.

Arthur C. Brooks: And not everybody has to drink 380 milligrams of caffeine.

Tim Ferriss: You have your 60 to 70 grams of protein as described, and then you are sitting down to write. What are you doing?

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah, then I can sit down and write. If I’m at home, then I sit down to write. And there’s no distractions. I mean, there’s no meetings, there’s no Zoom. I mean, if the President of the United States or the Pope calls, there’ll be a morning meeting, but that’s kind of it. And I’ve got a very quiet place. I’m not looking at email. I’m not answering text messages. I’m not reading the Wall Street Journal. And to do this, when I set myself up this way, I get four hours of productivity, and that’s very unusual. If you’re doing things the old-fashioned way, you’re getting up when the sun is warm and you’re having the nice big, three espressos to try to wake up, and you’re not optimizing your brain chemistry appropriately, you’ll get two hours of creativity, max.

Tim Ferriss: Max.

Arthur C. Brooks: And that’s why Hemingway used to write for two hours.

Tim Ferriss: I was just going to bring up Hemingway, also because he would leave things unfinished. He would basically end mid-paragraph so that he had momentum in starting the following day. And I suppose my question is, in a world of ubiquitous interruption and notification, where you have iMessage on your computer, you have ChatGPT, you have research that you might do concurrently with your writing, there are different ways to approach writing, how do you set yourself up, say, the day before, such that you can sit down without interruption, or self-interruption, for four hours and write?

Arthur C. Brooks: To begin with, you need to know what you’re going to do the next day, the day before. You need to make a list of the things you’re going to do, in priority order. And the priority order is not what you like the most, but what actually requires the most concentration and creativity. So the thing that you need to hit immediately, which will be the last 10 percent of that page you were writing. That’s a really good protocol to procrastinate that last 10 percent, because your most creative, most productive, your best quality stuff is first. And so, you want to leave It lasts to be the first the next day. And that way you’ve got consistent creativity. If I’m writing a column, for example, and I’m on deadline every single week for a column, and it’s 1,200 words a week of science about human happiness —

Tim Ferriss: Sounds stressful. Sounds like a way to make yourself unhappy.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah, no, I’m hunted. But doing that, if I sit down and write it, the kicker is always going to be worse than the lead. And so, the kicker is always the first thing in the morning, some day. So the kicker is as good as the lead, or better, because I’m leaving it so that my brain chemistry is optimized to the product that I’m trying to create. 

That was a very good protocol from Hemingway. His problem was, he was a drunk. And when you’re a drunk, what you’re doing is you’re borrowing tomorrow’s dopamine tonight.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, you’re borrowing, as a friend of mine put it also, you’re borrowing happiness from tomorrow.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah. And the reason is because your dopamine is going to be below the baseline and you’re going to have anhedonia in the morning. Anhedonia is the characteristic of clinical depression, which is a deficit of dopamine, meaning an inability to feel pleasure, and is below the baseline when you’re hungover, below the baseline when you’ve popped it really hard and you’re getting the trough the next day. So if you drink at night, and if you want to be productive the next morning, this morning starts last night, and it starts by going to bed at a reasonable time sober, which we’ll probably get to at the end of this conversation.

Tim Ferriss: So that’s why he had two hours of productivity.

Arthur C. Brooks: I’m going to bed sober.

Tim Ferriss: Well, also because if you need any — and this is my kind of repeated realization that should be top of mind all the time, which is if you wear an Oura Ring, a Whoop band, the one conclusion that you will come to over and over again is if you drink before bed, even a few hours before bed, your sleep is garbage.

Arthur C. Brooks: Your sleep architecture is so messy.

Tim Ferriss: It’s just — and for me now, for whatever reason at this age, I’m 48, even one — I had one martini with my brother. I don’t see him that much. We went out to a nice speakeasy, I had a drink, and just shattered my sleep. It was shocking to me. Kind of embarrassing, honestly.

Arthur C. Brooks: The older you get, the older you get. And the truth is that young people are figuring out what people my age didn’t when I was — I mean, I drank very heavily in my 20s and 30s. It’s what we did. I was a musician. It’s what we did. We knew it wasn’t good for us, but the truth of the matter is that all euphorics, if it’s euphoric, if it gets you buzzed, it’s neurotoxic. And you have to be careful applying neurotoxic substances to yourself, because you’re going to pay a price for that.

Now, there’s a cost/benefit analysis to anything. I don’t drive the safest car. I don’t drive a car that if it crashes, I will be completely safe no matter what. I drive something I like. I’m making a cost/benefit analysis. But the truth is that many people are not — they think it’s costless to get buzzed. It’s not. It just isn’t.

Tim Ferriss: So, your routine, I’ll just pause us there, is very, very similar to mine.

Arthur C. Brooks: Tell me more.

Tim Ferriss: Well, right now I’m day three of segueing into ketosis. We’re always producing ketones, but I’m probably, just because I’ve done this a lot, I’m probably at right now 1.2 millimolars in terms of blood concentration of beta-hydroxybutyrate after — 

Arthur C. Brooks: You like ketosis? You like how it feels?

Tim Ferriss: I love how it feels in terms of mental acuity. I also, because I have neurodegenerative diseases in my family, and metabolic dysfunction, see doing, let’s just call it four to six weeks of nutritional ketosis once, or twice a year to appear to be very cheap insurance.

Arthur C. Brooks: Oh, what’s your APOE profile?

Tim Ferriss: APOE3-4.

Arthur C. Brooks: You’re 3-4?

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, 3-4.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: And there are other risk factors. I also have relatives who are 3-3, but nonetheless developed early Alzheimer’s. So, I’m like, “Yeah, you know what? I like how I feel. I need less sleep when I’m in ketosis.” I naturally wake up very, very alert, which is unusual for me. So I wanted to mention that first just to set the stage in a way. So I, for decades, did minimum 30 grams of protein within 30 minutes of waking up. I still think that is a great option. For me now, for a host of reasons that I could get into, but I’ll keep it simple. I almost always do intermittent fasting where I am fasting until 2:00, or 3:00 p.m. in the afternoon. But when I wake up, like this morning, I woke up at 7:30, and I was preparing for this conversation. So, I wanted to block out a few hours to do that.

But woke up, had, now this is mildly stimulating, but I wanted to have a little bit because I’m also jet lagged, and arrived at around midnight last night. Had some cacao with a little bit of cacao butter mixed in.

Arthur C. Brooks: Nice.

Tim Ferriss: Just enough under three grams of net carbs.

Arthur C. Brooks: Because you’re keeping your net carbs to 30 a day probably, right?

Tim Ferriss: I’m keeping my net grams to, for me personally, right now under 10 grams.

Arthur C. Brooks: Under 10. That’ll get you into ketosis fast.

Tim Ferriss: Under 10, yeah. Especially if I am already adapted to intermittent fasting so that I’m doing 16 to 18 hours of fasting with a short six to eight hour window of eating. Once you get to 16 to 18 hours, especially if you’re doing some exercise, let’s just say in the morning, or any other point, you’re depleting your liver glycogen, and you’re going to get into the habit. Your metabolic machinery will develop the habit, and the capability of producing ketones even when you are eating carbohydrates in that limited window of eating. So — 

Arthur C. Brooks: And you don’t take exogenous ketones?

Tim Ferriss: I will occasionally on a day like today, because I know that I’m on effectively, let’s call it day two, and a half of segueing into ketosis. I think my natural production is roughly where I mentioned. My natural production right now is probably around 0.9. I took, let me just back up. So, I wake up at 7:30, I have the cacao plus some cacao butter. Then I sit in a — I have a hot tub. This is like one of my indulgences. It’s not actually that expensive, but I sit in a hot tub, and I meditated for 10 minutes with an app, The Way app. Henry Shukman is my spirit animal. Amazing. Mindfulness/Zen-focused practice. Did that 10 minutes, that’s it. Got out. It is pretty chilly right now in Austin. Gets down to, I think last night it was 37 low, got into my pool for a few minutes, and got out, cold shower, came back in, and then sat down, and this was my kind of deep work prep. No interruptions. Then — 

Arthur C. Brooks: There’s non-trivial similarity to what I’m trying to do neurocognitively.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, exactly. And then on the way here, about 15 minutes prior to arriving, knowing my start time, there were a few other bells and whistles that I threw in nutritionally in terms of supplements, and so on earlier in the morning, but had one nitro code cold brew from Starbucks, and about 15 milliliters of exogenous ketones. In this case, it’s BHB bonded to one three butane dial, which I do have some reservations about. Long-term chronic use I think could be liver toxic, but I’m doing it very intermittently. And so for the, let’s just call it four days of segue into nutritional ketosis, I will use exogenous ketones sometimes as a boost, and that’s it. So that was the moment.

Arthur C. Brooks: And it’s working great for you. And here’s the big takeaway, I think. You got to that through experimentation.

Tim Ferriss: Yep.

Arthur C. Brooks: You didn’t get that by getting it off the internet. You learned a lot about these different variety of protocols, and you tailored it, and tried it, and over a number of years came upon what worked best for you. And that’s exactly what I’ve done, too. And everybody watching needs to treat their life like a lab. Experimentation is king. And so information, experimentation is the precursor to good experimentation is information, is scientific information. And then it’s getting experience through the experimentation, and figuring out what your own protocol actually is because as they say in the ads, your results may differ.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, right. Exactly. And so for me, if I’m weight training, I will typically weight train late afternoon. That’s just always been my preference. But if we had not had this podcast today, I would have done Zone 2 training.

Arthur C. Brooks: In the morning.

Tim Ferriss: Right, exactly. So, after the meditation — 

Arthur C. Brooks: Before you eat.

Tim Ferriss: Before I use — 

Arthur C. Brooks: You like fasted cardio?

Tim Ferriss: After the meditation, I do like fasted cardio.

Arthur C. Brooks: I do, too.

Tim Ferriss: Especially when I’m trying to get into ketosis, or intermittent fasting, because it’ll help me deplete the glycogen, stored glycogen at a faster rate. If it is too high, just for people who may be interested in intermittent fasting, or ketosis, if the exertion level is too high, or if it is resistance training, sometimes it will spike glucose in such a way that makes it a little counterproductive if you’re trying to get into ketosis. So, the zones —

Arthur C. Brooks: Because your stress hormones are — 

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. Yeah, yeah, exactly. And you’re already going to have increased cortisol in the morning. You need that to wake up. And also with caffeine, oftentimes you’ll see a pretty noticeable spike in glucose. So I try not to compound it by doing the weight training in the morning.

Arthur C. Brooks: At this point in the cycle of getting into ketosis, do you have headaches?

Tim Ferriss: I had a mild headache yesterday. I will say that the biggest cheat for me in terms of getting into ketosis quickly, and relatively painlessly is training my body to intermittent fast, intermittently fast. And I have been in ketosis dozens of times in my life, and I’ve done extended periods, six months in ketosis, and so on, particularly when I was actually training for sports, which seems counterintuitive, but I was doing something called the cyclical ketogenic diet, which is really interesting. When I was training for the National Chinese Kickboxing Championships in ’99, that was an amazing system for cutting weight, getting lean, but also maintaining, or adding some muscle mass. In any case, people can look it up.

Arthur C. Brooks: You’re just confusing your system in a cycle, right? You’re staying out of equilibrium in a way, right?

Tim Ferriss: You’re definitely doing that. What you’re doing with the CKD, people can look it up. There are many people who’ve pioneered this. Mauro Di Pasquale with the anabolic diet. There are different names for it. Dan Duchaine way back in the day also talked about this, but you are providing a short window once a week where you are, in my case, doing a glycogen depletion weight training workout, and then you are spiking the hell out of your carbohydrate intake for, let’s call it 15 hours, something like that. And you are really piling in carbohydrate, and you are leveraging insulin as a storage hormone, and anabolic signaling sort of pathway to ensure that you can pack on some muscle while you are in, on average, ketotic state, which is very, very hard to do otherwise. So, that was, I don’t do that anymore because it’s just too much brain damage, frankly.

Arthur C. Brooks: Well, that’s a lot to think about. That becomes a full-time job. The protocol becomes the full-time job.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, which is not the point. In my case, I’m sure, in your case, it’s like the protocol is in service of life. Life is not in service of the protocol.

Arthur C. Brooks: The protocol is supposed to work for you. You’re not supposed to work for your protocol.

Tim Ferriss: And I mean, we’re not going to belabor this point, but in a world, and people, there’s a great Chuck Palahniuk quote that I don’t want to get wrong. People can look it up, but basically says, “Big Brother isn’t watching you. He’s entertaining you. Entertaining you to death,” and just talking about the sort of modern digital ecosystem, and the role of technology, et cetera. But suffice to say, if you can single task for four hours from a competitive advantage perspective, like you’re — 

Arthur C. Brooks: Not using pharmaceutical grade psychostimulants?

Tim Ferriss: You’re in an elite group. 

Arthur C. Brooks: You’re an absolute elite group, and you absolutely can do it with proper health, and exercise disciplines. 

Tim Ferriss: And also, I’ll just say to your point, managing the physiology, had a great conversation with Dave Baszucki recently, who’s the co-founder, and CEO of Roblox, and he, and his wife are the largest, well, their foundation is the largest funder of metabolic psychiatry research, including ketogenic therapy, which includes Chris Palmer at Harvard, and — 

Arthur C. Brooks: That stuff’s super interesting.

Tim Ferriss: Ketosis for me, it is like taking modafinil, and all of the kind of short-term powerful but long-term penalty drugs that I’ve tested over time.

Arthur C. Brooks: Have you ever taken a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, an SSRI?

Tim Ferriss: I have never taken one for antidepression. I have taken what is similar. It’s not exactly an SSRI, but I have used Trazodone for sleep.

Arthur C. Brooks: Oh, Trazodone is a monocyclic, right? It’s a really early, early generation antidepressant.

Tim Ferriss: It is effectively a failed antidepressant because it put people to sleep that was repurposed as a sleep drug is my understanding. 

Arthur C. Brooks: Like Unisom was supposed to make you not sneeze, and doxylamine succinate actually was supposed to make you, was an antihistamine that was repurposed as a sleeping pill.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, there you go. So, that is it. But why do you ask about SSRI?

Arthur C. Brooks: The reason I ask that is because a lot of people will say that they find that a proper keto diet is better than an SSRI too, for the serotonin effects.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, yeah. I mean, if you look at, people should look up Chris Palmer. I had a conversation with him as well, but for mood stabilization, mood elevation, but not in a peak, and trough type of way, I have found nothing better than the ketogenic diet.

Arthur C. Brooks: That’s interesting. So, for mood management, this is fundamental for you?

Tim Ferriss: It is. It is without exception the number one with no close second.

Arthur C. Brooks: So poets, take note.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, poets take note. And maybe you should just — we have to revisit this. People are like, “What is this math scientist poet stuff?” You want to just explain what we’re talking about?

Arthur C. Brooks: So there are four affect profiles, and affect profiles mean the intensity of your negative, and positive emotion. You’re born with this. So, there are times in your life when you have more positive emotionality, or more intense negative emotionality, depending on circumstances, but this is your baseline state. You can be above average positive, and above average intensity, negative emotion. Those are the mad scientists. That’s me.

Tim Ferriss: You have high highs, and low lows.

Arthur C. Brooks: I’m all about it’s great, or it sucks. And it’s impossible to be married to a mad scientist. My wife reminded me of that this morning. There’s you can be above average positive, and below average intensity negative. These are cheerleaders. These are the happiest people. They have some weaknesses. They tend to be bad bosses because they won’t accept bad news, and they can’t give criticism. Like no bad vibes, man. There are some people who are low, low. They’re just low affect people. These are the judges. They make really good surgeons. You don’t want somebody to cut you open, and go, “Oh, my God!” That’s not what you want. You want somebody who’s going to be like, “Eh, I can take that out.” Or nuclear power reactor operators, or something who are really calm.

Tim Ferriss: Low low means low positive, low negative.

Arthur C. Brooks: Low positive, low negative.

Tim Ferriss: Got it. Their side wave is flatter.

Arthur C. Brooks: They’re steady, man. I mean, they’re not freaking out about anything. And then there are those who are low intensity, positive emotion, but high intensity, negative emotion. And these are the poets. And the poets are the most interesting. And the reason is because they tend to be the most creative, and most romantic. And part of that is because there’s this research, all neuroscience research is contested. I should preface this, but there’s a part of the limbic system called the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex that is involved in your rumination when you’re depressed. Ruminative depression, ruminative sad depression is a heavy activity of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. You also use it when you’re ruminating on a business plan, or writing a symphony, and when you’re ruminating on another person, because you’re falling in love, and that’s why poets tend to be depressive, creative, and romantic. Tim Ferriss, my friends, this is Tim Ferriss.

Tim Ferriss: That’s me in a nutshell.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah. And so the whole point is that you need, no matter who you are, you need to appropriately manage your mood. The essence of self-management is mood management starts with knowledge about who you are. And people can go to my website, and take a test, and figure out who they are, which profile you are. And then you got to figure out what you need to do in mood management. Do you need to elevate positive emotion, or do you need to manage? You don’t need to eliminate negative emotion. You don’t want to do that. You’ll be dead in a week. Negative emotion is really important for protection, sadness, anger, disgust, fear, but you want to manage it so it’s not dysregulating. So, it’s not exaggerated. And there are lots of techniques for doing it, but you got to know what your bigger challenge is by knowing yourself.

Then you can proceed to some of these protocols that we’re talking about here for appropriate mood management based on your challenges is how it works. For you, it’s managing positive up, and managing negative down. And ketosis is really, really good for both.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. I would say for folks who may fit the poet profile, or who are curious about my personal experience that repeatedly, I mean, I’ve done this now dozens of times. It is very consistent. It completely removes the lowest 50 percent of my negative, and bumps my positive baseline up 20 percent.

Arthur C. Brooks: This is really interesting, because this might be the poet’s protocol. Ketosis might be the poet’s protocol. For me, it’s what I eat, how I self-administer caffeine, and it’s actually how I do my exercise. When I’m super fasted, first thing in the morning is incredibly efficacious for managing down my negative affect without accidentally managing down my positive affect.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. I want to point out another thing about your protocol, which is by having caffeine later, this is my experience, because I love caffeine.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: I love stimulants.

Arthur C. Brooks: It’s great.

Tim Ferriss: I have to be very careful.

Arthur C. Brooks: I know.

Tim Ferriss: If I start later, guess what? What an incredible sleight of hand trick. I consume less. Why? Because I started later.

Arthur C. Brooks: Right. And no crash.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. And so I will start later, and your total caffeine will be less. Why is this relevant? Because the half life of caffeine is very long. And if you have too much caffeine early in the day, even if you stop by noon, it will still impact your sleep, sleep architecture, and so on.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah. And the older you get, so the half life, the metabolism of caffeine, it changes over the course of your life, and the half life extends. One of the things that I find for friends of mine who are like me in their 60s, and they’ll be like, “I’m sleeping. I sleep like crap because I’m old.” It’s like, probably because you have an espresso after lunch. And when you were 30, you could metabolize the caffeine effectively. The half life was probably eight hours, and now it’s probably 14 hours. And it’s still in your system bothering you when you’re trying to go to sleep at night. Take out that after lunch espresso, move your caffeine, stop drinking caffeine after 8:00, or 9:00 in the morning. It’s like magic.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, it is incredible. I’ve actually, I reserve coffee, caffeine like a nitro cold brew for days like today.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: And then otherwise I’m using yerba mate, or cacao, or pure tea, or some combination thereof.

Arthur C. Brooks: You like yerba mate? You like what it makes you feel?

Tim Ferriss: I love it.

Arthur C. Brooks: It’s very smooth.

Tim Ferriss: I love it.

Arthur C. Brooks: It’s a smooth buzz, as we used to say in high school.

Tim Ferriss: It really is the smoothest of the smooth.

Arthur C. Brooks: I know.

Tim Ferriss: It’s just also the most inconvenient. I like to drink it the Argentine way with the sipping —

Arthur C. Brooks: The wood cup, and the metal straw that gets really hot.

Tim Ferriss: Exactly. Yeah. Which is probably a great way to give yourself throat cancer, side note, or mouth cancer.

Arthur C. Brooks: We’ll find out.

Tim Ferriss: But, yeah, we’ll find out. Track the Argies, people are looking at that very closely. All right. We probably should talk about the meaning of life, small topic.

Arthur C. Brooks: It’s just a little thing. It’s what I’ve been thinking about for five years.

Tim Ferriss: I want to know why, after your many books, author of 15 books, right? You have Build the Life You Want, co-authored with Oprah Winfrey, From Strength to Strength, which was my first introduction to your books, which is an exceptional book, Finding Success, Happiness, and Deep Purpose in the Second Half of Life. And now The Meaning of Your Life: Finding Purpose in an Age of Emptiness. Why write this book?

Arthur C. Brooks: So, when I came back to academia, I was gone for a long time. I’m sort of a lifelong — I’m a third generation academic, actually. My dad was a professor. His father was a professor. This is the vortex of life. I tried to escape it by being in music all the way through my 20s, but it sucked me in. And so this was my natural habitat, but I left for almost 11 years, because I was the CEO of a big think tank in Washington DC called the American Enterprise Institute. And when I was gone, I wasn’t paying attention to academia. I left at the end of 2008. I came back in 2019. My memory of my academic experience, going back intergenerationally, is the happiest place in the world. Everybody has the best time in college. They make all their friends. They get a bunch of adventures.

They get exposed to weird new ways of thinking. People loved college. And most people say I was happier in college than when I left college. I come back in 2019, and it’s like the plague had gone through my village. It was completely different. And in point of fact, clinical depression among adults under 30, especially highly educated adults under 30, college graduates, especially the elite colleges, had tripled. Clinical depression up by 3X anxiety, generalized anxiety, 2X. And it’s not because of a lack of therapy. On the contrary, the number of therapists has gone up by about 4X. And so something’s not working. This is what we call in my business as a psychogenic epidemic, which is a simple idea with fancy words because that’s how we get tenured.

And what it means is there’s something that’s contagious, and creates suffering, and has no biological origin, no known biological origin. That’s a psychogenic epidemic. So, eating disorders, and cutting, and many things, they’ll spread around, create tons of misery, but they’re not biological in origin. And so those are harder nuts to crack. The depression anxiety epidemics that we see today are psychogenic. And so we need to understand what’s behind them. So, when I see the data, and I set about my research agenda saying, “Okay, what’s going on?” And that’s a kind of a Sherlock Holmes, kind of a forensic behavioral science experiment. And that’s kind of how I do my work. That’s the most interesting things to do is to figure out this mystery using the tools, or my stock, and trade. I suffered through to get my PhD, applying them a little bit. And one of the things that I do is I just start talking to people, and doing a content analysis of what they tell me, and see the words that start to pop up.

Those are the clues, because the words will start popping up. And when you do that, the word that kept popping up again, and again, and again was, “I don’t know what I’m meant to do. My life feels meaningless.” And sure enough, when you do the survey work, and ask people if their life feels meaningless, that’s the predictor of depression, and anxiety. And so we have lots, and lots of data out there. I mean, lots of pop arguments about why so many young people are depressed today. And people my age are like, because they’re entitled babies, and they’re not tough enough. And people who are my kids’ age who are in their 20s, they’ll say it’s because boomers wrecked everything, and made houses too expensive, and spoiled the environment, or something. But people have been saying that stuff forever. There’s nothing new about that. These psychological effects that we’re seeing are new.

They’re really, really a new thing. So, that’s not it. Or there’s a lot of people, and you’ve talked a lot on your show about technology, and a lot of people say that technology is screwing us up, and technology really has a big role in what I found, but the problem is not the technology per se, but what we’re not getting because of the technology, is what we’re actually missing.

Tim Ferriss: Right. It’s what it’s displacing.

Arthur C. Brooks: What is it actually that we want that we’re not getting? When you have somebody who is deeply malnourished, you don’t talk about what’s actually creating the malnutrition. You might, that’s important, but what they’re not getting.

Tim Ferriss: Right. It’s like, okay, you’re eating all carbohydrates.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah, it’s like — 

Tim Ferriss: It’s not that carbohydrates are inherently bad, but the dose makes the poison. And by virtue of only eating carbohydrates, you’re not getting any amino acids that you eat.

Arthur C. Brooks: But the problem is the protein you’re not getting for Pete’s sake is what it comes down to. So, I wanted to find the protein that was underneath this whole thing. And the content analysis of these interviews is like, what I’m meant to do, life feels meaningless. I don’t know the meaning of life. I’m like, “That’s too big.” That’s too big. That’s like a big philosophical thing, but I couldn’t avoid it, is what it came down to. So, over the past five years, I’ve been writing a book about, okay, what is the meaning of life? Where do you find it, and how do you have to live differently so that you can actually find it in modern life? And that’s what this book is. And the most interesting part of this was people say, where do you find the meaning of life? Church, the beach, Italy.

Tim Ferriss: Italy.

Arthur C. Brooks: And it turns out that we — 

Tim Ferriss: It’s Trenton, New Jersey. No offense to Trenton. I’ve spent a lot of time there.

Arthur C. Brooks: Seattle, my hometown. We know where you go to find it, and then you have to do certain things. I’m a very protocols guy. And so what this book is, the six protocols for once you know where the meaning of your life is, what you have to do to go there, and get it is what it comes about. So, the beginning of the book is, okay, what’s the meaning of meaning? Because it’s too big.

Tim Ferriss: Right. It is big. It’s huge.

Arthur C. Brooks: It’s too big. The second is where do you find it? And the third thing is how do you have to live differently? That’s what this book is.

Tim Ferriss: Well, let’s start with definitions. That’s how I like to roll.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah, I know. And that’s the most important thing that scientists almost never do. Throw out a term, and then not define it. So the meaning of life has been discussed forever, but the best philosophical, and psychological definitions, they disassemble it into its component parts. So, the way that you, and I have talked about happiness in the past is that happiness is a combination of enjoyment, satisfaction, and meaning. So, meaning is a macronutrient of happiness. And when that’s missing, that’s why you have a happiness problem. So, that’s the beginning of this whole thing. Meaning in turn has macronutrients, has component parts to it as well. Psychologists will refer to them as coherence, purpose, and significance. Coherence is why things happen the way they do. You have to have a theory of why things happen the way they do, or you won’t know the meaning of your life. Now for some — 

Tim Ferriss: Meaning how life, or why life unfolds for you — 

Arthur C. Brooks: Things are happening all the time.

Tim Ferriss: — the way it unfolds.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah, things are happening. It’s like why?

Tim Ferriss: So, is that picking — I don’t want to dislocate the sharing of the three.

Arthur C. Brooks: No, no, it’s important.

Tim Ferriss: But just to, maybe we’ll come back to it. Is that coming up with, or adopting a story that is enabling?

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah. It’s adopting a story that actually explains things so that life is not inherently random.

Tim Ferriss: Okay. But it doesn’t need to be objectively accurate when explaining.

Arthur C. Brooks: No, no. It’s just a — it’s your way of seeing things. It’s your understanding of the world. It’s putting things in context, and so things kind of make sense. Otherwise, it’s this random walk through life, which is sort of a definition of meaninglessness. For some people, the model, which is an imperfect model at best, but it’s a model nonetheless, it’s a physics that explains that is religion. For some people, it’s pure on science. For some people, it’s conspiracy theories, why things happen the way they do. But those are different sort of models that explain this. Now, you can also have a hybrid model, which I do. Religion, and science, and all this kind of good stuff, but you got to do the work to figure out the physics of that, why things happen the way they do.

Tim Ferriss: So, coherence — 

Arthur C. Brooks: That’s coherent.

Tim Ferriss: — is figuring out why do things happen in my life.

Arthur C. Brooks: Why do things happen the way they do? Why are things happening all the time? The second is purpose. And people often think purpose, and meaning are the same thing. They’re not. Purpose is a subcomponent of meaning, and it is, why am I doing what I’m doing? Why am I doing all these weird things every single day? And that has to do with goals, and direction. If you don’t have goals, and direction in your life, everybody has said this. I mean, there’s like Napoleon Hill said this, and Dale Carnegie said this. You’ve got to have an endpoint. In Spanish, there’s a great word called el rumbo. Rumbo means — in English, it doesn’t have a lot of significance.

It’s a navigational term that means rhumb line, which is where you’re going. It’s the Euclidian path from where you are to where you’re going. And you have to have a rhumb line if you’re going to make any progress, you’re going to have any goals in any direction, it’s what you need to have. It doesn’t mean that you have to be linearly making progress, but you have to have an idea of what that line might be. That’s el rumbo.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. Even if the endpoint changes.

Arthur C. Brooks: Exactly. And so that’s why you need an intention, and that’s what purpose is all about. Why am I doing what I’m doing? It’s the second why question. The why part is really important, as we’ll see in a second. The third is significance, which is why does my life matter? Why does my life matter? And if the answer is it doesn’t, that’s a problem, or I don’t know, that’s not good enough. People need to have a concept of why your life matters. And the great ways of answering that question are having kids, and being married, and believing that God loves you, and all kinds of ways to have that significance question answered. So, in my work in the book, there’s a test on where you are in the journey to answering those questions, how close you are, how much you’re looking. And so that’s presence, and search. If you’re looking, looking, looking, you’re a searcher, you’re a total seeker. So, your search score is going to be through the roof. Now where you are — 

Tim Ferriss: My finding score may not be as high.

Arthur C. Brooks: Well, the presence, that’s presence, right? And what happens over the course of life is that people who search more, their presence score tends to go up, but it might not be that high. So, my presence score is very moderate.

Tim Ferriss: Could you explain this just one more time for me?

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: Could you just start that over?

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah. So there’s two ways to kind of measure where you are in this journey of finding meaning, of searching, and finding for meaning. The two ways to do it are what’s called search, and presence. Search is how intensively you’re looking to answer these why questions. Why do things happen the way they do? Why am I doing what I’m doing, and why does my life matter? And that’s search. And some people are intent seekers like you, Tim, you’re an intense seeker. This show is an exercise in search, right? And part of it is because this is not just a new hack for getting better biceps. This is a new way of trying to understand why we’re alive. That’s what the show is, kind of the theme of the show. It’s why I listen to the show. This is why I learned things, because I’m a seeker too. But then how successful you are is your presence score. Search, and presence. Presence is, ah, I have answers that are satisfactory to me. As you get older, if you seek, your presence scores should go up. And mine certainly has.

Tim Ferriss: So, is a presence just to — 

Arthur C. Brooks: The presence of meaning.

Tim Ferriss: — make sure I’m understanding. One is seeking an answer. And then presence is accepting.

Arthur C. Brooks: Is having something that’s satisfactory.

Tim Ferriss: All right. Got it.

Arthur C. Brooks: Is having satisfactory. Now there’s some people who have sky high present scores, and really low search scores. Those are people who like those fortunate individuals who are born going, “Yep, I know. I know. I don’t need to learn. I don’t need to — I’m not going to leave my hometown. Why am I going to leave my hometown? It’s awesome here. What do we need to do? I’m going to marry my high school sweetheart. I’m going to work in my daddy’s business, and I’m going to go to the church I grew up in.” And they’re very, very stable. We think of these as conservative individuals. Dispositional conservatives, they tend to have low search, and high presence.

Tim Ferriss: Right. And to be clear, this is not — 

Arthur C. Brooks: This is not political.

Tim Ferriss: — political.

Arthur C. Brooks: It might be, but that’s not really the point. I’m talking about dispositional conservatism is conserving good things that preceded you. And why are they good things? Because they give you a meaning of life is kind of what it comes down to. On the other hand, you might be somebody who’s a seeker, seeker, seeker, seeker, seeker. And you don’t find it very much. And I’m very moderate in presence. It’s higher than it used to be. My presence of meaning was in the cellar when I was in my 20s for sure. And in my 60s is much, much higher for sure.

But it’s still not — 

Tim Ferriss: What do you attribute the improvement to? 

Arthur C. Brooks: As being alive, and actually searching a lot, and looking at data, and optimizing, and trying to live a life on purpose, is self-managing. I mean, I’m a behavioral scientist because I want answers, and I want answers for me. And so if I basically — I’m looking for the biggest questions to answer, to at least address the biggest questions of my life, that’s why I do what I do for a living. I mean, my life is an experiment, and a pure on revolving adventure.

Tim Ferriss: So, I’m curious if I can just interject for a second about the present piece specifically, because I think many people listening to the show will self-identify as seekers, but there are traps along the way as you identify as a seeker.

Arthur C. Brooks: And I talk about these in the book.

Tim Ferriss: And I’ll just tell one quick anecdote, and then I’d love to hear how you have improved, or whether it’s just been maybe not a passive, but something that has unfolded for you, the presence piece specifically. I remember talking to a very, very experienced psychedelic therapy facilitator who’s been doing it for many decades, thousands, and thousands of different people in sessions. And they told me a story, which they said is common, and becoming more common, that people will come in, and after their session, they’ll say, “Yeah, I was experiencing so much joy, this beautiful light, this love in this session, but I kept wondering when I was going to do the real work, like when I was going to do the hard work.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: And the way the facilitator explained it was in a sense, more and more so she’s running into people who are in pursuit of this durable contentment, satisfaction, joy. But when they experience it in these sessions, they’re like, “Yeah, I’ll get this out of the way so I can do the hard work to reach the joy.” But they’re just pushing aside all the joy as they continue their endless seeking.

Arthur C. Brooks: They’re just not going to take yes for an answer.

Tim Ferriss: Right. So I’m wondering how you learn to take yes as an answer.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah. So it’s not easy because when you’re a chronic seeker, there’s always something more. There’s always something new. And you can’t be there yet. And so the answer to this actually comes, I have two of my kids are Marines. And so I have one enlisted Marine. I have one officer in the Marine Corps. And my daughter’s a second lieutenant in the Marine Corps. And right now she’s at Quantico and she’s going through the basic school, getting ready to do her MOS. She wants to be a signals intelligence officer. My son was enlisted, he was a scout sniper. He was in a scout sniper platoon out of Camp Pendleton. And that’s a super interesting and dangerous job. And as a non-commissioned officer, he led a lot of guys. What they train Marines to do in leadership is to get to 80 percent knowledge and then choose and stop looking. Now that’s really, really important because you’re going to be paralyzed if you’re trying to get to 100 percent knowledge.

Tim Ferriss: You’re never going to have complete information.

Arthur C. Brooks: Which is what the pure seeker mentality does. If you want to seek and get higher presence, you need to go to 80 percent. Now, how do you get to 80 percent? You get to 80 percent by saying, “I’m pretty sure this is right. And this is right enough that I’m going to turn my attention to another dimension on this.” And that means, friends, if you’re in love, you should get married. That’s what that means.

Tim Ferriss: Wow.

Arthur C. Brooks: That means if you’re in love and you know each other and you think that within three to five years, you really could be best friends. And you have a certain stability of values. Stop looking. Get married. Why? Because the longer you don’t get married, the longer you’re in search for your soulmate, the more you’re putting off the best thing in your life. You’re postponing the best thing in your life. Marriage is the best thing in life for most people. I mean, a bad marriage is the worst thing in life. But for most people, this is for men and women, all this fiction about the fact that marriage is good for men, but bad for women, it’s all nonsense. Brad Wilcox’s research at Virginia is completely clear on this. It’s better for everybody. Being in love and living with the person with whom you’re in love for the rest of your life is great. But you’re not going to get that if you’re trying to get to 99 percent awareness, if you’re going to search all the way to the point, because you’ll never get that.

You’re going to have an argument, you’re going to have a disagreement, you’re going to have doubts, you’re going to digest something in a weird way and think maybe I’m not in love. And the same thing is true with your faith. What am I going to practice? Get to 80 percent awareness and choose, and then decide that that’s what you’re actually going to do. Use the marine rule of leadership and then the search can actually lead to presence.

Tim Ferriss: Okay. This is all interesting terrain, which is why I was looking forward to this conversation.

Arthur C. Brooks: It’s a lot.

Tim Ferriss: It’s a lot. It’s a lot. And of course, as I said before we started recording, I was like, “We are not going to suffer from a lack of topics to talk about.” I want to come back to the coherence, purpose, significance, macronutrients of meaning for a moment. Just in quick review, coherence, why do things happen in my life? Having a story for that that you commit to in a sense. Why am I doing what I’m doing? That’s purpose. And then why does my life matter? Significance. Looking at my peer group, my friends, a lot of people in my audience, it seems like number three, why does my life matter, is where people struggle the most, a lot of them. In part, we can talk about the dozens of factors at play I’m sure, but for some people, and I have some thoughts on this, but for some younger people, it’s I don’t know what to do because AI is going to take all the jobs and I don’t know, therefore, how my contributions will matter.

Arthur C. Brooks: I will become less significant.

Tim Ferriss: I will become less significant. The climate is irretrievably fucked, which I don’t actually believe is the case, but a lot of damage — 

Arthur C. Brooks: They have certainly heard that.

Tim Ferriss: — a lot of damage has been done.

Arthur C. Brooks: They’ve been taught that.

Tim Ferriss: Right. Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. Nuclear armageddon, that is actually on the list of existential threats, one of the scary ones, in my opinion. Therefore, I don’t know how to conclude that my life matters. How did you personally arrive at an answer to this question or how do you suggest people explore unpacking that? I have some thoughts. I’ll just, rather than burying the lead, I’ll just throw it out there, which is take the time to not just study people who do huge things in short periods of time, but also study people who commit to things that take longer than their lifetimes, like scientists, like people — 

Arthur C. Brooks: Clergy.

Tim Ferriss: Clergy. By simply extending the time horizon, the spectrum of options opens up quite a bit, but I would love to hear you explain it.

Arthur C. Brooks: That’s a very good point. That’s a very good point. But there’s a compatible point with that, which is stop looking for your significance at the macro level, start looking at the micro level, which is your love relationships around you. This is where people feel significance. People feel significance by having children. People feel significance by getting married.

Tim Ferriss: Or adopting children.

Arthur C. Brooks: Or adopting children as I did. And I did both. We did it by markets and by biology. And people feel significance by working through their religious tendencies to try to understand their relationship with the divine. This is how most people find significance. You don’t find significance by getting a million Instagram followers. You will never find significance by doing that, but that’s indeed what we’re encouraged to do. You won’t find significance by an adequate kind of stable significance by being the world’s greatest angry activist. And that’s the cult that’s actually going on on college campuses all the time, the cult of activism, which is kind of a substitute religion. Significance comes from love. Love is the essence of significance and it’s whom I love and who loves me. That’s what it comes down to. And if the answer is my spouse, my children, my parents, my friends, my creator, those are the big answers that people actually get, but you got to do the work. You got to make the commitments and do the work. And a lot of people today, one of the things that I actually find in this book is that a lot of young people today don’t have those micro commitments and they’re trying to establish macro significance.

Tim Ferriss: Macro.

Arthur C. Brooks: Which is a big problem. You’re chasing your tail. It’s unstable and it’s probably not even real in a lot of cases.

Tim Ferriss: You mentioned something in passing that I think is really important, at least I’ve come to believe it’s helpful to at least try to unpack each person for themselves. Substitute for religion. So you mentioned this cult of the angry activist. And activism has its place for sure. There are certain things that you can — 

Arthur C. Brooks: Of course. I’m glad we’ve got civil rights.

Tim Ferriss: — harness anger for. But over the long term, it’s not a clean fuel. So this substitute for religion, there’s a place called El Arroyo here, which is famous for its signs that it puts out front. There are books that collect these now. I think it’s called El Arroyo here in Austin.

Arthur C. Brooks: Arroyo means the brook, means the stream.

Tim Ferriss: Exactly. Exactly. Like [foreign language] for people who might have spent time in Mexico.

Arthur C. Brooks: Nice.

Tim Ferriss: That’s a long one. Anyway.

Arthur C. Brooks: By the way, Arroyo as a surname in English is Brooks.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, yeah, there you go. Look at that.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah. Yeah. In German it’s Bach.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

Arthur C. Brooks: As a former musician, I say, “Coincidence?”

Tim Ferriss: So the reason I bring up this joint in Austin is because they have these signs out front that are very funny that have been collected in books since. Like, “What if soy milk is just milk introducing itself in Spanish?” Very funny stuff. They put a lot of them up.

Arthur C. Brooks: Soy milk.

Tim Ferriss: And one of them is, “If someone is vegan and does CrossFit, which do they tell you about first?”

Arthur C. Brooks: I know.

Tim Ferriss: Which I thought was pretty good. And this ties into, I believe it was something David Foster Wallace said, tragic character, brilliant on so many levels, but in effect, and people could track this down, I put in my newsletter at one point, but that we all worship something and task number one is figuring out what you worship.

Arthur C. Brooks: That’s his I think his graduation speech.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

Arthur C. Brooks: Where he talked about that, right?

Tim Ferriss: Right. So if it’s not religion, it’s going to be something else. Is it money? Is it fame? We talked about this a bit.

Arthur C. Brooks: We did the four idols last time we talked. Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: We did. Right. Exactly. Pleasure, that’s where I landed, for better and for worse. And I’m wondering, it seems to me that religion, belief in the divine, might be another way to put it, is almost genetically programmed in humans. I mean, it is — 

Arthur C. Brooks: That’s an anthropological empirical regularity. So what we find is that anthropologists, including paleoanthropologists, find there’s no civilization that they’ve ever encountered that doesn’t worship.

Tim Ferriss: Right.

Arthur C. Brooks: There are individuals who don’t worship, but there are no cultures that don’t have religious foundation to them. We’re built for that.

Tim Ferriss: So if we’re looking at taking a closer look at that, if people want to make the implicit explicit, the subconscious conscious, which I think is really important because folks are gravitating to these pseudo religions, whether it’s CrossFit, veganism, ketogenic — 

Arthur C. Brooks: Harvard.

Tim Ferriss: — Bitcoin, you name it. Harvard.

Arthur C. Brooks: Famous university.

Tim Ferriss: Right. Whatever it might be. So trying to put that on one’s radar I think is helpful. But then the question is, okay, if this is hardwired, if this might actually be a constitutional psychological requirement, how do you satisfy that requirement if you are not going to adopt an organized religion?

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah. So I’ve looked a lot.

Tim Ferriss: This is a quest for me.

Arthur C. Brooks: No, I hear you. I completely hear you.

Tim Ferriss: This is very present for me.

Arthur C. Brooks: I feel a lot of people — 

Tim Ferriss: I feel like I made a lot of progress for myself, but I’d love to hear you talk about that.

Arthur C. Brooks: So this is a question of not of religion, but of transcendence.

Tim Ferriss: Exactly. Exactly.

Arthur C. Brooks: Transcendence is the phenomenon in which we move from the me self to the I self in the words of William James, the father of psychology. The I self is looking out and including looking up and standing in awe. The me self is looking in the mirror and thinking about yourself. What we need to actually find meaning, to find significance paradoxically is to look less at ourselves. Significance, the sense of significance comes from being — this is really paradoxical and yet everybody will understand it when I say it. To be significant, to feel significance, you need to be less significant, you need to make yourself less significant. Now, I had this experience where at my university, the most popular class arguably is astronomy one. And they’re not astronomers. I mean, they’re like English majors and business majors, et cetera. And they love the astronomy class. They flock to it. There’s lines for the astronomy class. And so I finally ask a student like, “Why do you love that astronomy one class so much?” She’s like, “I don’t know. But like I go into the morning, Thursday morning at nine o’clock and it’s a 90-minute class and I’m bummed out because I just had an argument with my mom and I think I’m breaking up with my boyfriend and I got a B on a test,” which at Harvard is like the end of the world.

Tim Ferriss: You’re excommunicated from the church of Harvard.

Arthur C. Brooks: “I go in at 9:00 and at 10:30 I come out and I say, “I’m a speck on a speck on a speck and I’m at peace.” That’s transcendence. That’s what it is, it’s to stand in awe. Have you had Dacher Keltner on your show before?

Tim Ferriss: No.

Arthur C. Brooks: He’s one of the great psychologists of our time. He teaches at Berkeley. And he has a book called Awe, A-W-E.

Tim Ferriss: I thought I recognized the name because I was just reading that book.

Arthur C. Brooks: It’s a great book.

Tim Ferriss: I was just reading that book just a few months ago.

Arthur C. Brooks: That’s transcendence, it’s to stand in awe in the I self looking out in awe of the universe, things bigger than you. And there’s two dimensions of transcendence. The first is to transcend upward and the other is to transcend outward. Which is why worship of the divine, spiritual and religious experiences do this and also service to others, that’s why they both have this kind of transcendent metaphysical experience that people actually get. And that’s why when you see moral beauty, somebody serving somebody else, it gives you that — Rhett Diessner, the psychologist, who, by the way, is Rainn Wilson’s uncle. Yeah. The world’s leading expert in moral elevation and the physiological impact of moral elevation.

Tim Ferriss: Rainn is very philosophical also.

Arthur C. Brooks: He’s great. He’s a great friend. We’re great friends. We grew up five miles apart from each other in Seattle at the same age. We didn’t know each other as kids.

Tim Ferriss: Small, small world.

Arthur C. Brooks: But we bonded over watching Gilligan’s Island on Channel 11 when we were in fifth grade or something. And it’s really important to keep in mind that there are ways to transcend. And there’s some really well established ways to do it. I go to mass every day. It’s a venerable way to experience transcendence. And there are other ways to experience transcendence. Now, I’m not going to speak to the metaphysics of who’s cosmically right. That’s a completely different conversation. I don’t know. But I do know when it comes to transcendence, because that’s research that I’ve done. And Lisa Miller has done that. She teaches at Columbia. She does neuroscience and social psychology at Columbia. She’s the world’s leading expert on how the brain requires transcendence, how you get experiences that are completely inaccessible unless you experience transcendence. Lots of ways to do it. Study the stoics and live according to their dictates. Walk the Brahma Muhurta, an hour in the morning without devices. Starting before dawn, practice Vipassana meditation. Listen to the works of Johann Sebastian Bach and stand in awe of the greatest composer who ever lived. Or go to mass.

Tim Ferriss: All right. I wanted to tee this up. I didn’t know what your answer was going to be. But this is an area, it is one of a few areas that have been of greatest interest and focus for me for the last, well, one could argue since 2000 probably 12, but it might even predate that, particularly I would say in the last five years. 

And for people who are interested in digging into this, and I suggest that almost everyone should be very deeply interested, you mentioned the book Awe. There’s also some fantastic writing and articles out of Johns Hopkins related to awe. And if awe seems too abstract, I mean, you could think of it as wonder. You could think of it also as self-transcendence. And I’m going to be shooting myself in the foot a little bit because I just wrote 10 pages on this that I need to refine before putting it on my blog. But people think of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs as a pyramid. And at the top you have self-actualization. In fact, the pyramid and that strict hierarchy were created by consultants and other people who commercialized the writings of Maslow who later revised that to have self-transcendence — 

Arthur C. Brooks: At the top.

Tim Ferriss: — at the top.

Arthur C. Brooks: At the top. But he talked about it much later in his career too.

Tim Ferriss: Much later.

Arthur C. Brooks: Because he got more religious as he got older. People get more religious as they get older. They believe less in Santa Claus and more in God as they get older.

Tim Ferriss: They believe more in death too.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah. Yeah. And life is messy and they come to terms with that. And Scott Barry Kaufman talks a lot about this, the guy who is sort of the master of the Dark Triad and a lot of pathologies, but he’s also really good on how — 

Tim Ferriss: I have to ask about the Dark Triad.

Arthur C. Brooks: Oh, yeah. I’ve written a lot about the Dark Triad.

Tim Ferriss: Sounds like a great fantasy novel.

Arthur C. Brooks: It’s like anybody who wants to know that, that’s your first husband. Anyway.

Tim Ferriss: Okay. I’m going to have to leave that alone. I’m going to resist the temptation.

Arthur C. Brooks: But next time on the show.

Tim Ferriss: Just for a second.

Arthur C. Brooks: So this is important because self-transcendence is something that tends to happen a little bit later, but it’s not incompatible with lower order needs.

Tim Ferriss: Do you mind if I just play for a second?

Arthur C. Brooks: Please. Because I think this is the point you’re driving at, right?

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. Let me ride the ketones and caffeine for a moment here. All right. So the awe, self-transcendence, wonder, it seems perhaps abstracted, might seem hand wavy for people who’ve already achieved success. I don’t think that’s true at all. And in fact, the happiest people, happy isn’t exactly the right word, but the people who seem most at peace, calmest, with regular joy in their lives, good relationships, all have regular doses of self-transcendence. Whether they are wilderness guides who do not make very much money, but they’re spending a lot of time in nature, a lot of time with their loved ones, a lot of time in expansive landscapes, whether those are musicians and poets who have figured out how to kind of ride the lightning without suffering too much from the low lows, there are regular ways to do this and I cannot recommend strongly enough some form of meditative practice, whether that is prayer with your rosary. Our friend travels with the rosary and also with blood flow restriction cuffs, but that’s a story for another time.

Arthur C. Brooks: I’m not doing blood flow restriction with a rosary.

Tim Ferriss: No, exactly. Right. I mean, you could. I guess that could be interesting. Maybe that’s the next niche on your Instagram feed. But the reason that I bring up meditation is because I think one of the easiest paths to self-transcendence and to significance in your life is training your awareness so that the mundane becomes miraculous. And when you start to recognize how fucking unbelievably insane it is that we are even conscious to begin with having this experience, and you start to notice how incredible the little things are, which require you to not be distracted, requires you to breathe and pay attention, it’s not that complicated, it can be challenging, then you start to perceive almost everything as significant without focusing on establishing your own significance.

Arthur C. Brooks: True. Absolutely.

Tim Ferriss: And I have just found that to be such an unburdening when you realize that you can do things and should do things that help you feel like you are contributing, that help you feel like you’re having an impact on something other than yourself, whether it’s someone or something, but that in fact, self-help, self-development can really be a sort of exercise in self-obsession.

Arthur C. Brooks: Totally.

Tim Ferriss: And therein lies the seeds of misery.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah, for sure. For sure. It’s me, me, me, me, me. And your point about paying attention to what would ordinarily be thought of as mundane, my father, who is a lifelong Christian, he always said, “People talk about the miracle of walking on water. You know what the real miracle is? Water.” And another point based on what you just said, which is really important, is self-transcendence is really great, being more in the I self, but you also need to do the work to be less in the me self. And that means getting rid of the mirrors in your life. We have way too many mirrors. I had a guy who worked on my back. He was a guy who worked on Tom Brady’s back in Boston. So he’s the best guy. If Tom Brady — and so he was phenomenal. And I asked him, “What did you do before you were this incredible acupuncturist and great physical therapist?” And he said, “I used to be a fitness influencer.” I’m like, “Dude, tell me more. What’s this life all about?” And as a social scientist, I was really interested.

And he would take off his shirt and be on social media and show his abs and then sell supplements or something. And I said, “How was it?” He says, “Awful. I didn’t eat what I wanted for 10 years. I was so lonely. It was so awful. And I was so ill.” And I said, “So how’d you get out of it? How’d you cure yourself?” And he said, “I decided, I said I had enough. I got rid of my social media. I took every mirror out of my house, all of them, bathroom, every one. And then I showered in the dark for a year, so I couldn’t see my abs.”

Tim Ferriss: Oh, the cross we bear.

Arthur C. Brooks: No, but that’s like the most Tim Ferriss thing ever is the I self protocol. And he said he was cured. So not just serving other people more, worshiping more, whatever happens to be, but also militating against the me self. And that’s not just physical mirrors, it’s the notifications on your social media. There’s lots and lots of metaphorical mirrors that are making you miserable all the time.

Tim Ferriss: So what are other ways of facilitating self-transcendence? And I, for instance, I’ve interviewed BJ Miller, who’s a hospice care physician. I interviewed him a long time ago. And he talked about, for instance, at the end of life, some of the most meaningful experiences were not these deep conversations about the meaning of it all necessarily, but like baking cookies together. He talked about introducing people who are weeks or months from dying to art.

Arthur C. Brooks: Right. Right. Because he wants to induce a flow state.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

Arthur C. Brooks: That’s what we’re talking about. One of the great things about transcendence is — so Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, who wrote the great book Flow.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, that’s how you pronounce his name.

Arthur C. Brooks: Csikszentmihalyi. Yeah, that’s right.

Tim Ferriss: A lot of consonants.

Arthur C. Brooks: It’s tough, man. That’s a tough name. He talked about the fact that you have a transcendent experience when you’re in a state that is the state of self-forgetting. That’s what flow is. It’s intensely pleasurable for any of us at any particular time. And so we established the first way is worship or meditation. The second is service to others. But the third is really is total absorption, is total absorption in the kind of thing that you do. Which by the way, is one of the reasons not to wear headphones when you’re working out. One of the reasons to be fully there when you’re working out, to establish a mind-muscle connection when you’re working out. It might sound trite, but it really is because you should be able to attain something of a flow state when you’re working out. Otherwise, it’s an hour of misery that you’re going to want to distract yourself from. So what, so you’ve got better calves? It’s just so dumb, which is the ultimate me self kind of experience.

So that’s really the third way to do it, is find your thing, is what it comes down to. And by the way, my protocols lead up to four hours of writing. That four hours goes by in minutes because it’s a flow state and I’m having a transcendent experience. I’m in an I self transcendent experience. It’s not me. It’s like some other guy’s writing this thing. I don’t know what’s going on. Clickety, clickety, clickety, click. And before I know it, my wife says, “You want lunch?”

Tim Ferriss: Nature seems like another option. It’s so simple. Just walk barefoot outside for a few minutes. Look, if it’s two feet of snow, it might be harder. But to the extent that you can, try to get your feet on the ground. Beauty. I mean, beauty, what an interesting bizarre thing in and of itself. I actually wanted to look semi-professional as I try to on occasion. And instead of holding loose paper, I was going to bring a clipboard. Couldn’t find a clipboard. So I was like, “Well, I’m going to bring a book.” And I thought, I don’t know if you’ve ever seen this particular artist, but I wanted to pass to you. Have you ever seen Andy Goldsworthy?

Arthur C. Brooks: I’ve heard of this, yeah.

Tim Ferriss: All right. So this is — 

Arthur C. Brooks: Using pure nature.

Tim Ferriss: This is Andy Goldsworthy: A Collaboration with Nature. Everybody should get this book. But just check out some of the images in there.

Arthur C. Brooks: This is the idea of beauty of working with nature as opposed to against it.

Tim Ferriss: It’s using natural found objects, whether trees, leaves — 

Arthur C. Brooks: A circle of dandelions.

Tim Ferriss: — ice crystals, a circle of dandelions. It is the most mind-boggling kind of — if James Turrell were to only work with organic materials outside of a hobbit house, what would they look like? They’re just absolutely entrancing, would be the word I would use. And so this is the book I want to use as my clipboard.

Arthur C. Brooks: I like it. And this is of course transcendent. This is at the essence of using human ingenuity in a flight of fancy. This is pure harmony between who we are and what we’re meant to be. I love it. I love it. And this is harder and harder to do in an environment in which we’re living in the simulation. This is life out of the simulation, effectively. This is who I am, but outside of the matrix, which is why it’s so striking and strange.

Tim Ferriss: So tell me more.

Arthur C. Brooks: So the transcendent experience is the one thing, the one place that they don’t happen is an assimilated experience of human life. Fundamentally, transcendent experiences require being fully alive. There’s the great fourth century sage and saint, Saint Irenaeus, who’s one of these guys where, I mean, today it’s pretty costless to be religious like me. In those days, you might get your head cut off. And so he was doing a lot of deep thinking. And he said, “The glory of God is a man fully alive.” And it wasn’t a gendered comment. A person fully alive is the glory of God. 

So then the real question is, what does it mean for me to be fully alive? And I ask my students, are you fully alive when you get up and the first thing you do is you pick up your phone, which is by the side of your bed, and check in with a universe that’s being mediated through the small screen. And then you do your work on the Zoom and then your friends are on social media and your dating is on the app and your progress is made through your score on your gaming and your relationships are stripped of their humanity because you’re looking at pornography. Are you or are you not fully alive? And if the answer is you’re not fully alive, the reason for that is because you’re living a simulated life. And a simulated life just, Tim, isn’t beautiful.

Tim Ferriss: And a simulated life means you’re cosplaying life.

Arthur C. Brooks: That’s right. And this is one of the things that I found in my interviews for this book as well. I kept hearing meaning, meaning, meaning, meaning, meaning, but you’re talking to a lot of 27 and 28-year-olds and their affect is very flat because they’re telling you the same story over and over again. And this is where the penny dropped. This guy says, 27-year-old guy, he said, “I really do feel like I’m not living a real life. I really feel like I’m living in a simulation every day. And I don’t know how to break out because my job is fully remote, because I can’t meet women on the corner and say,” like Bill Ackman said on social media the other day, he said, “Men should come up to women and say, ‘I would like to meet you.'” What does that mean? And watch them run in terror.

“And because my friends really are virtual friends, because my sense of achievement really is what I can actually do with this gaming experience or whatever it happens to be that I’ve gotten really good at. How am I supposed to do that? I don’t know how to break out of this. But I know it’s not right. I know something’s not right.” Here’s the funny thing. Your brain, you can kind of be fooled. The Turing test can be passed with respect to the kind of experience you think you’re having, but then there’s a deep knowing. You can’t simulate the meaning of your life. You can only live the meaning of your life. A simulation is a complicated simulacrum for the complex experiences of human life. And that’s a non-trivial use of language. 

Tim Ferriss: This is pops over dinner, right?

Arthur C. Brooks: Exactly. A complicated problem is that which is very, very hard to solve, but once you solve it, it’s static and you can do it again and again and again.

Tim Ferriss: Engineering problem.

Arthur C. Brooks: It’s an engineering problem. It’s a how and what problem. Complex problems are super easy to understand and impossible to solve. And I’ll give you an example. Making a jet engine is a complicated problem. We didn’t do it for a long time. Making a toaster is a complicated problem. I mean, I defy you to build your own toaster with stuff in here. You’ll burn your house down if you’re trying to make your own toaster. It’s a complicated problem. My marriage is a complex problem. I understand what it means to love and be loved. I understand. I can’t put it into words. I’m not Pablo Neruda. But I understand what it means to love and be loved. But I will never solve my marriage.

Tim, I mean, this morning before we started, Ester texted me, “I love you,” and she does. And when we finish, I’m going to turn my phone back on again, she might be pissed off at me. I don’t know. I don’t know. And part of this is because she’s Spanish and that adds a layer of complexity in and of itself. But that’s the point of my marriage. The things I care about in life are complex. They’re not solvable. They’re only livable. And so if I take a complicated simulacrum of anything, I’m doing it wrong because I’m not going to be satisfied and my brain’s going to know.

Tim Ferriss: How much of the malaise associated with the feeling of being in a simulacrum is resolved just by having more in person human interactions? Because the older I get, and maybe this is just the path of people as they age, I don’t know, but I have one foot in the cutting edge, bleeding edge technology. I’m fascinated by the latest advancements in you name it, doesn’t matter, but I’m very involved.

Arthur C. Brooks: AI, neuroscience, biologics, all of it.

Tim Ferriss: Right. Right. The last 24 hours, I’ve had conversations with three or four scientists all at the cutting edge of different fields. I love it.

Arthur C. Brooks: Me too.

Tim Ferriss: Simultaneously, I feel like we should pay attention. And this is, I guess, I’m not borrowing, but certainly I’m in lockstep with Nassim Taleb on this, which is paying attention to things that have persisted for very, very long periods of time. And also paying attention to evolutionary biology. It’s like we are evolved to be very social creatures moving through physical space together.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yes.

Tim Ferriss: Full stop. And if you take that away — 

Arthur C. Brooks: If you take one or the other away, you’re in trouble.

Tim Ferriss: You’re in big trouble. And you don’t have to understand all the myriad mechanisms by which this and that happens and 15 different hormones interact to produce some type of subjective experience. It’s like if we have evolved with these things as constants over millennia upon millennia, maybe it’s a good idea.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah, that’s right.

Tim Ferriss: Keep them as regular ingredients in your daily experience.

Arthur C. Brooks: We know why. We know why the need exists. We know exactly. Neuroscientists know exactly what you’re talking about. And this is the theory of hemispheric lateralization. Again, very simple idea with complicated words for tenure. This is the theory that’s being most popularized right now, but probably the most visionary cutting edge neuroscientist living today is Iain McGilchrist at Oxford.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, smart.

Arthur C. Brooks: He wrote The Master and His Emissary back in 2010. And The Master and His Emissary talks about the fact that the two hemispheres of the brain do many things the same, but fundamentally they get your two needs, which is to figure stuff out, to dominate world’s problems, to make progress, and to feel fully alive by being a beloved person. Why? We have two hemispheres of the brain that do those complicated things. That’s the left hemisphere. How and what? And the complex things, which is the why questions, that’s the right hemisphere of the brain. All of the mystery, the meaning, the love, the happiness, that’s processed in the right hemisphere of the brain. And how you go out and do stuff is in the left hemisphere. The problem is modern life. This gets into the meaning crisis, has pushed us all into the left hemisphere of our brain and slammed shut the door to the right.

Everything that we’re doing from workaholism to hustle culture, to making sure that people don’t study humanities, they only study STEM. And most especially to the simulacrum, the technologized simulacrum for ordinary life, that’s all left hemisphere. And if you’re on the left hemisphere, you’re going to know how and what, and how and what and how and what, and you’re going to be bereft of why, including the big why questions, which make up the meaning of your life. And so the solution, where is meaning to be found? It’s the right hemisphere of your brain. How do you open it up? That’s the meaning protocols. And it really comes down to these very simple ideas that we’ve already been exploring. And it comes down to this. There’s something that I promise you that great-grandfather Ferriss never said to your great-grandmother, which was, “Honey, I had a panic attack behind the mule today.” And the reason is because it wasn’t a thing.

And the reason is his brain was working the way it was supposed to work. His life was pretty boring, and it was boring from day to day, objectively boring, but he never said my childhood was boring. And his right hemisphere was exercise as well as his left hemisphere. And the result is he didn’t have flooding of the HPA axis. He wasn’t morbidly depressed for no apparent reason. He didn’t live in a world of affluence and yet feel like he was experiencing nothing. And the reason is his brain was working the way it was supposed to work. This was not a policy problem.

This was a neurophysiological problem that he didn’t have and that we have actually today. And so the result is we have to live in an extraordinary way that was ordinary 100 years ago. The simulation we really need is the old-fashioned life is what comes about because almost all of the things that I talk about in my research that people can experience if they actually put some work into it is to open up the right hemisphere of the brain and do what was absolutely ordinary not that long ago, three generations ago, as a matter of fact.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. Yeah, complicated versus complex. I like the distinction. And also having just come back, I’ll just brief aside, every year I do this past year review, I’m going to be doing that in the next few weeks.

Arthur C. Brooks: Me too.

Tim Ferriss: Look at my top relationships, top defined as dear, close relationships that are reliably nourishing for everybody involved and energizing. And then I book time in the next year, more time with all those people. I established these relationships and then I book more time with them in the subsequent year. And often with extended trips, I just came back from a trip with a number of my very close friends. And I look at some of the basics and I think it’s replicable where three days into it, granted these are my close friends. But I challenge anyone, if you put in 20,000 steps a day and you compliment, let’s just say, two of your close friends and three strangers and tell me by the end of the week that you don’t feel better, right? There’s simplicity right — 

Arthur C. Brooks: And check your phone only 10 times.

Tim Ferriss: Right. Yeah.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah, exactly.

Tim Ferriss: Right on the other side. And if you do those things, by the way, you’ll probably be checking your phone a lot less, hopefully. I want to touch on something because I know we, as expected, are going to run out of time before we run out of topics to talk about, but I’ll let you pick where you want to go first. So there’s a line here that I have, or it’s more phrasing that I want to hear you expand on. Your suffering is sacred. And then there is a line here, which is treat your life like a pilgrimage that opens your mind and heart so life’s meaning can find you. So those are both interesting to me. Your suffering is sacred and so that life’s meaning can find you. Because most people think of themselves as going out to find meaning if they think about it at all. So dealer’s choice, which one would you like to — 

Arthur C. Brooks: We’ll start with suffering, because suffering is the big, most misunderstood thing in most of modern life. We have an eliminationist strategy toward especially mental suffering. We see big increases in depression and anxiety. And if you go to campus counseling at any university and you’re going to say, “I feel sad and anxious.” They go, “We’ve got to fix that.” Well, probably you can have some therapy, there might be some psychiatric medications involved. And I had nothing against therapy or psychiatric medications to save the lives of people in my family. But the truth of the matter is that suffering per se is life itself.

I mean, that’s the first noble truth of dukkha, right? But it also suggests that you have a working limbic system, which is your alarm system for threats in the environment. Negative emotion exists as a threat system, as a threat alarm system. And negative experiences is the only way that you learn. There’s a reason that great philosophers always say that suffering is your teacher, because suffering is the ultimate complex right hemisphere experience that teaches you about the meaning of your life. And if you try to eliminate your suffering, you will inadvertently eliminate meaning. That’s what will happen. The worst mistake that people can make is trying not to suffer. I still tell my students, these are MBA students at Harvard. I say, “You’re studying at Harvard University, getting your MBAs. If you’re not sad and anxious, you need therapy. Something’s wrong with you if you’re actually not suffering.” So the real question is, how can you learn and grow from it? The math that Buddhists have about suffering is this following. Suffering equals pain multiplied by resistance, pain times resistance.

Tim Ferriss: That’s good.

Arthur C. Brooks: And it’s really important because what we know about that is that people are trying to lower their suffering by lowering their level of pain. And what they should be doing is actually understanding and putting into proper context and proportion their suffering by lowering their level of resistance.

Tim Ferriss: Resistance. Yeah.

Arthur C. Brooks: That’s what it comes down to. And every good athlete understands that.

Tim Ferriss: And by the way, just very quickly, the meditation that I was describing and recommending is effectively that.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yes.

Tim Ferriss: It’s lowering your resistance to everything that you would be inclined to resist.

Arthur C. Brooks: And my students have a little mantra they start at the beginning of the day and say, “I am truly grateful for the pleasant things that are going to happen this day.”

In the Psalms, “This is the day that the Lord has made, I will rejoice and be glad in it.”

“And I’m also truly grateful for the troubles I’m going to face because my learning and growth will come from these troubles, bring them on.”

And that’s this bracing. And I say this every day because I’m going to suffer today. And Tim, you’re going to suffer today.

Tim Ferriss: Sure.

Arthur C. Brooks: And if you try to eliminate that suffering, all you’re trying to do is lower your pain level to ephemerally and artificially and ineffectually lower your suffering.

Tim Ferriss: And that Psalm might as well have been also put right next to Marcus Aurelius meditations. I mean, it’s — 

Arthur C. Brooks: Absolutely. I mean, Christian thinking is heavily influenced by the Stoics. They were contemporaneous. This is why they sound so familiar to each other. And the whole idea is like, you got a choice. You can learn and grow from your suffering or you can try to avoid your suffering and have the same amount of suffering and not learn and grow. What do you choose? And that’s what it comes down to. So that’s the most difficult lesson, but the most bracing and empowering lesson about how to find meaning in your life is to lean into your suffering and you will find your meaning. And that’s what Grandpa Ferriss had to do because he had no choice. He had no therapist. He didn’t even have Advil. And so that’s what I’m talking about. 

Then the second point that you made, the second question you asked is, okay, when you’re in search to get presence, you’re in search, search, search, search. There’s a mistake that people commonly make, was thinking, if I search enough, I’m going to find. Seek and you shall find. Knock on the door shall be open unto you. But the process is a little bit counterintuitive and different. Every religious tradition has a protocol for finding truth and that is to make a pilgrimage in which point it is revealed that your truth finds you. Now there’s a lot of ways that that’s described in the Bhagavad Gita where going to the birthplace of the Lord Krishna in Mathura, in the Hindi heartland, in Christianity for the community of the Santiago, which I’ve walked twice across the ancient root of 1,100 years old, doing the Hajj, if you’re a Muslim. What you find is that when you make a pilgrimage, that’s a metaphor for your life.

And the end of the pilgrimage is the metaphor of the ultimate goal of life, which in Abrahamic religions is heaven, right? And it’s the end of samsara and the karmic religions or whatever it happens to be, is they’re reuniting with a Godhead in the Hindu body of religions. But the bottom line is that what’s most important is actually what’s happening to you in the process of this pilgrimage. And what actually happens to you neurobiologically is that you beat yourself to the point that you have an open aperture so that you’re no longer in a defensive crouch such that you’re weak. You weaken yourself on purpose. This is why you walk 25 kilometers a day and you’re walking on blisters and you’re actually inducing this amount of pain.

And I remember this the first time I walked my Camino, I was in a liminal space in my career. I just stepped down as the CEO of this big think tank. And I didn’t know what I was going to do. I mean, I was 55 years old and I was spent, dude, I was out of gas. I was burnt out. I’d been working 80 hours a week. I missed a lot of my kids growing up. I’d made mistakes, right? They stuck with me by the grace of God. And I was walking the Camino day after day after day. I was praying. I was tired and I was in pain. And when I entered into Santiago de Compostela, this medieval city in Northern Spain and I saw the cathedral, I realized that my mission was to spend the rest of my life lifting people up and bringing them together in bonds of happiness and love, using science and ideas to be a scientist in the public interest, but for love and happiness. And I didn’t find that. It found me.

Tim Ferriss: Question, how did that appear? Was it drop by drop? Was it a Japanese breakfast on a silver platter in your mind? I mean, did it all come at once or was it bits and pieces that you slowly were able to weave together? 

Arthur C. Brooks: It was bit by bit because it’s not this epiphany. It’s not like falling off my horse on the road to Damascus and in a temporary blindness, which is probably temporal epilepsy in the case of St. Paul, but it was a realization. It was a realization. It was something that had already existed out there, right? And it felt like it came to me little by little, particularly over the last couple of days, the last couple of days of the pilgrimage. It was, “What am I supposed to do?” I’m supposed to return to my roots as a scientist and to use that as missionary work for greater love and happiness. To get into the mission field as a behavioral scientist, going back to the roots of what I’ve actually learned. Why? What do I want? For me and for everybody, I want more love. I want more happiness. I want more meaning. That’s what I want for me and for everybody because that’s the sustenance of actually what we need.

Tim Ferriss: Did that want come into high resolution in part because of the nature of that particular pilgrimage, the religious connotations and the prayer along the way? Or do you think that that was already just a little beneath the surface and waiting to come out and it would have come out in a different environment, the different context?

Arthur C. Brooks: That’s a good question. It’s an empirical question. But I will say that all of the components of the pilgrimage, not to be metaphysical about it, not to be mystical about it at all, all the components of a pilgrimage, which is the physical difficulty, the strain that actually comes from it, the intense effort that you’re making while away from these technological distractions, the work that I’m doing on my relationship with God and my wife, with whom I’m holding her hand and praying the rosary.

Tim Ferriss: You did the pilgrimage with your wife?

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah. Yeah. And I would’ve done 33 days except she’s like, no. So we did the last eight. And all of these things turn out to be the ways that you open the vault of the right hemisphere of your brain, where the mysticism is actually found, the mystical side of your brain, which I believe God creates for a reason. But it might just be nature and it might just be a coincidence. But the bottom line is you must open that door and all the things you do in a pilgrimage open that door.

Tim Ferriss: And also, if it is nature, it serves some very important, at least from an evolutionary perspective, function.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: I mean, when we look back at just the history of science, but just to take a slight digression, at all the many things that we thought were junk DNA, all the many things that we thought were vestigial, all the many things that we thought were just leftover and nature forgot to get rid of it.

Arthur C. Brooks: Male nipples.

Tim Ferriss: Male nipples, I still don’t have a great explanation or a great use for. I mean, maybe I’m sure I’ll get some suggestions on X.

Arthur C. Brooks: Let’s watch the comments, Tim let’s watch the comments.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah. The comments, I’m sure will have plenty of suggestions. But I mean, it’s half your brain, right? So along with the — everyone needs whatever, eight glasses of water a day and can only have 30 grams of protein at a given sitting. We only use 10 percent of our brain, not true. We use all of it.

Arthur C. Brooks: True. Absolutely. Absolutely. I mean, that was a thing when I was a kid in the ’70s.

Oh, if you could get access to the other 90 percent and then a science fiction story will have you, the person who knows how to use the other 90 percent, can fly or something.

Tim Ferriss: So gaining, really embracing and fully utilizing that right hemisphere characterized the capacities that you’re mentioning are — I have just found it to be such an incredible unlock for me in so many ways. And just to deepen the somatosensory and psychological texture of life, you really need that right side, and at least as you’re describing it. And — 

Arthur C. Brooks: I’ve seen this in your work, by the way. So I’ve been very aware and familiar with your work for a long time. And the typical algorithm for people who are seekers is to start on the left side, and then they find their way to the right. You become more spiritual, more mystical, more cosmic in your outlook as you’ve gotten older. And so you wouldn’t write The 4-Hour Body the same way today. I’m sure you wouldn’t.

Tim Ferriss: No. I stand by all of the tactical stuff.

Arthur C. Brooks: I love it. I love it. I read that book. I’ve just really enjoyed it. I mean, I learned a lot from it, but it’s a very left brain approach. And you realized in your own life, as people generally do, that you needed the right hemisphere as well. And so that’s why you talk about it’s like, why is Tim getting all mystical again? No, no, no. He’s actually moving hemispherically into the full brain.

Tim Ferriss: Well, also it’s like the how-to, the technician’s side, the engineering problem of, let’s just call it self-improvement. Whether that’s physical, cognitive, psycho-emotional, what is that in service of? For most people, if they ask why a few times, they’re trying to improve their quality of life and the quality of the lives around them they care most for. To do that, you need to do things like distinguish between the me self and the I self. Anthony de Mello has a lot of really good writing on this as well. You need to lower resistance, right? Which you could think of as also paying very close attention to the serenity prayer or stoicism or fill in the blank.

And there’s something to be said, I think, when I also have conversations with some of the most, as far as I can tell, at peace, reconciled, but yet still productive in the world, people. Whether that’s Henry Shukman, who I mentioned, or the Jack Kornfields or CEOs who also pay attention to these things. They are all reading and learning from people, whether it’s the Christian mystics, whether it’s Rumi, so Sufi mysticism. You go down the line, it’s all the same thing. Zen Buddhism, when I check my wifi connection, I always go to dailyzen.com and occasionally you find something that’s pretty interesting. They’re all talking about the same stuff. Maybe we should take a gander.

Arthur C. Brooks: And to put a point on what you just said, the meaning of life comes from the right hemisphere of your brain, and you can’t get to the right by going further and further left.

Tim Ferriss: No. No, no, no.

Arthur C. Brooks: That’s probably a political point too. I’m not sure. But this is a problem that a lot of people have. They want more and more and more. I mean, I’ve got protocols. I got protocols up the wazoo, man. But protocols aren’t it. What they can do is they can facilitate — it’s the same thing. 

People ask me all the time, how is AI going to interact with happiness? The answer is that AI is an adjunct to the left hemisphere of your brain. The way that it can bring you happiness is that if you do left brain things with it, thus freeing up a whole bunch of time that you then use to deepen your relationships in real life with real people. That’s an algorithm right there, man.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah.

Arthur C. Brooks: The way that you won’t get it is if you try to use it as an adjunct to the right hemisphere of your brain by making it your love or friend or therapist.

Tim Ferriss: Or if you use it to do certain things more quickly so that you can simply consume the free time you’ve created with more left dominant.

Arthur C. Brooks: By frittering away your time on Instagram.

Tim Ferriss: Which is what I predict most people will do.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah, exactly right.

Tim Ferriss: So the idea of this — the era of leisure time is, on its face, pretty ridiculous because that’s been predicted with every advance in technology, but — 

Arthur C. Brooks: Exactly. And we started off by talking about the technology that I use, which is my morning protocol. The morning protocol, per se, is not the secret of happiness. It instantiates. It enables. What it is an architecture such that I can actually have the freedom to live in the right hemisphere of my brain and find the meaning of my life. That’s what all of these protocols are. That’s why blood flow restriction is a left brain protocol. But the reason that you do anything like that is because ultimately what you want is more freedom in a way, more freedom to spend it in what really matters most in your life, which is more love. It’s more love, it’s more meaning, it’s more significance, it’s more coherence, it’s more purpose.

Tim Ferriss: So I want to end where I promised we would end. And The Meaning of Your Life, this is the new book, Finding Purpose in an Age of Emptiness. I love your writing. I love your thinking. People should absolutely check out the book. I need to ask you briefly about a specific element of your evening routine and wind down. And that is personal evening reading. What do you read before you go to bed?

Arthur C. Brooks: Before I go to bed, I read something that’s not trying to educate me better. But trying to be generative to me. I want to use — and again, this is very left brain thinking. I want my sleep to be concentrated in the hemisphere of my brain that’ll bring me the most meaning. And what you read before you sleep will actually stimulate the part of your brain that you’re going to use most while you sleep. It’s one of the reasons that if you want to remember something, read about it right before you go to sleep and you’ll actually remember it, but you won’t learn something you don’t know, but you will remember something better. That’s the reason that I read the Psalms. Actually, I like to have the Psalms read to me in a feminine Spanish accent.

Tim Ferriss: Sounds great. Sign me up.

Arthur C. Brooks: I read love poetry.

Tim Ferriss: Do you have any favorite Psalms? And then love poetry, what are we talking?

Arthur C. Brooks: Well, actually we are talking about Neruda. The greatest love poet ever. The Chilean love poet in Spanish, which, pronounced in Spanish from your beloved, is like a narcotic and yet it won’t ruin your life. The Psalm, Psalm 121. Any of the Psalms actually, because they have a different flavor as you work your way through them. The first Psalm is like a tree planted by streams of water who prospers in all that he does. The idea of God’s promise and love for you, Tim, and that promise and absorbing that promise of the intense love for you, which is the essence of significance at the metaphysical level and absorbing that and having it read to you, or reading it or having it read to you is so significant. That’s a beautiful thing to do and that’s a great part of the evening protocol. The evening protocol is happiness and better sleep, deeper love, generativity in the nighttime hours. Which, by the way, for me, are a torment. I’m a terrible sleeper. I’m terrible. And you can’t get the machine off, right?

Tim Ferriss: Machine. Are you talking about — you can’t get the machine — 

Arthur C. Brooks: There’s no off switch.

Tim Ferriss: Right, the off switch. I’ve become much, much better at it, much better. But that has, for my entire life, been the — ruminative challenge is that I laid down to go to sleep and my mind is like, “I’ve been waiting all day to tell you so many things.”

Arthur C. Brooks: I know. I know. “There’s some things we need to discuss here. This is very important.”

Tim Ferriss: Exactly. “You’re probably wondering why I gathered you here today.”

Arthur C. Brooks: Exactly right. “The boss has something on his mind.” I know. I know. And when your spouse, your partner is a good sleeper, that can be really problematic because then they’ll have a heavy conversation with you and then go — 

Tim Ferriss: Oh, yeah, no, that’s a no fly zone. That’s verboden. 

Arthur C. Brooks: That’s my wife.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, that is verboden.

Arthur C. Brooks: Part of the protocol, this is really important for everybody watching us who doesn’t sleep alone, is actually the oxytocin protocol. Which is, as we all know, the love molecule, the bonding neuropeptide that functions as a hormone in the brain. Women have three times as much as men. Side note, here’s how you fix every marriage. You do four things. Number one, you have more fun together as opposed to rehearsing grievance. More fun, less grievance. Therapy is like grievance, grievance, grievance. And have more fun together. Number two.

Tim Ferriss: And how long have you been married?

Arthur C. Brooks: 34 years.

Tim Ferriss: Okay.

Arthur C. Brooks: Second is pray together because the fusion, one flesh is the fusion of the right hemispheres of your brains. This is the goal. If you get married, Tim, the goal is to fuse your right hemispheres. And the best way to do that is by meditating together, is by praying together, is by doing right hemisphere activity together. The third protocol is to make eye contact whenever you talk. Never be talking without making eye contact. Way more important for your wife than it is for you. Way more important because she gets three times as much oxytocin, which means she’s better at bonding, but it also means that she’s better at starving, when she’s not getting enough oxytocin.

And eye contact from the beloved, which is when you have eye contact with a newborn baby, oxytocin is like the 4th of July inside your head, which is why you wouldn’t leave the baby on the bus because suddenly the baby’s kin, right? It’s an evolved phenomenon. And last but not least is remember ABT, always be touching, always be touching, always be touching. More important for men than for women, as a matter of fact. That’s why when you’re with your beloved and she hooks her arm into your arm while you’re walking down the street and you’re like, “I’m big and strong.” Why? Because that’s super important. So the last thing before you go to bed, when you’re reading to each other or when you’re talking, go five minutes earlier to bed, five minutes earlier to bed and stare at each other.

And it’s hard. It’s scary, it’s like — the eyes, according to St. Paul, are the windows to the soul, and that’s when you know you really feel it. And biologically, the reason is because oxytocin is just like old faithful for her. She will love you more if you have 5 to 10 minutes of intense eye contact before you go to sleep while you’re holding hands under the covers.

Tim Ferriss: And by the way, for anyone who has not tried this — 

Arthur C. Brooks: You’ve done this, right?

Tim Ferriss: I have done this. 5 to 10 minutes is so long.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah. Yeah, yeah.

Tim Ferriss: It’s a really long time — 

Arthur C. Brooks: Oh, it’s intense. Here’s an exer — 

Tim Ferriss: You could start lower, right?

Arthur C. Brooks: You can start lower, but here’s the most intense exercise you can do. If you want the break glass plan for fixing your relationship, right? Here’s what you do. You stand in front of each other, staring at each other in the eyes, silent, and you hold your arms out to the side like in an iron cross holding hands like this for eight minutes. And so what’s going on here?

Tim Ferriss: Is this for the Shaolin Monk therapy school?

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah, yeah. Yeah. It’s super painful. And it’s going to be more painful for you because after about four minutes, you’re holding her arms up, right? So there’s like five pound weights in each hand. And so you’re in intense excruciating pain while having your soul opened with a crowbar.

Tim Ferriss: Right?

Arthur C. Brooks: And this is intense there.

Tim Ferriss: How did you arrive at this?

Arthur C. Brooks: Well, I’ve experimented with this and also I read the research, right? And I participate in the research. I’ve actually done this a number of times. There’s a number of religious traditions that will do exercises actually that are like this. I did one in Spain last year and it’s called Proyecto Amor Conyugal.

Tim Ferriss: Okay.

Arthur C. Brooks: And that’s the Marital Love Project. It’s a very big deal across Spain. It’s not in English yet. And so it was in a little retreat center outside Madrid. And we were seeing — Because my wife and I, we do a lot of talks together and we counsel couples that are engaged, et cetera. This is our side hustle, right? It’s helping people fall in love and stay in love. And so we were just like, “What’s this method everybody’s so crazy about?” We were doing stuff like this and it was like, Holy mackerel. I mean, because they don’t know how much neuroscience they’re actually doing. There’s somebody who came up with this and said, “I wonder if this works.” It’s like, it’s really, really heavy. It’s just top-notch neuroscience matched up with — it’s as left and right brain as you can get.

Tim Ferriss: Wow. Cool. And also, not yet in English, that sounds like a job for Arthur Brooks and some AI tool.

Arthur C. Brooks: And Ester Brooks, who’s like — she’s the spiritual leader in our family.

Tim Ferriss: Yeah, there you go. Job for Ester, who wouldn’t need the AI. Arthur, always so much fun to spend time together. Thank you for taking the time.

Arthur C. Brooks: Thank you, Tim.  Thank you for what you’re bringing into the world. Even when I’m not in person, I’m with you virtually and you enrich my life.

Tim Ferriss: Oh, thanks, man. This is, boy, talk about lucky timing. All the serendipity required to end up with this job, remarkable. And I get to spend time with people like yourself. The Meaning of Your Life, folks, check it out. You can get it everywhere books are sold. And people can find you at arthurbrooks.com on all the socials.

Arthur C. Brooks: Yeah.

Tim Ferriss: Presumably, is there anything else you would like to share? Anything else you’d like to say or request to my audience? Anything at all before we wind to a close?

Arthur C. Brooks: If you don’t know what to do today and meaning feels out of reach, turn off your device and go love somebody. And it doesn’t really matter how you feel because love is an act. It’s a commitment. It’s a decision. And you’ll lift up yourself and that person in a little bit of the whole world. Happiness is love.

Tim Ferriss: Boom. I think that is a perfect place to end. And folks will link to everything as usual tim.blog/podcast. Go love somebody, including yourself.

Arthur C. Brooks: Right on.Tim Ferriss: See you next time. Thanks for tuning in.


DUE TO SOME HEADACHES IN THE PAST, PLEASE NOTE LEGAL CONDITIONS:

Tim Ferriss owns the copyright in and to all content in and transcripts of The Tim Ferriss Show podcast, with all rights reserved, as well as his right of publicity.

WHAT YOU’RE WELCOME TO DO: You are welcome to share the below transcript (up to 500 words but not more) in media articles (e.g., The New York Times, LA Times, The Guardian), on your personal website, in a non-commercial article or blog post (e.g., Medium), and/or on a personal social media account for non-commercial purposes, provided that you include attribution to “The Tim Ferriss Show” and link back to the tim.blog/podcast URL. For the sake of clarity, media outlets with advertising models are permitted to use excerpts from the transcript per the above.

WHAT IS NOT ALLOWED: No one is authorized to copy any portion of the podcast content or use Tim Ferriss’ name, image or likeness for any commercial purpose or use, including without limitation inclusion in any books, e-books, book summaries or synopses, or on a commercial website or social media site (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.) that offers or promotes your or another’s products or services. For the sake of clarity, media outlets are permitted to use photos of Tim Ferriss from the media room on tim.blog or (obviously) license photos of Tim Ferriss from Getty Images, etc.

The post The Tim Ferriss Show Transcripts: Arthur Brooks — Finding The Meaning of Your Life, The Poet’s Protocol, The Holy Half-Hour, and Why Your Suffering is Sacred (#841) appeared first on The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss.