2026-08-28 04:23:43
From February through June 2026, our research team studied 32 fractional RevOps agencies operating across North America. Agencies were screened for active service delivery and verifiable client histories, then rank-ordered using a proprietary algorithm built around the following criteria:
The table below shows the top seven performers, with detailed summaries following.
In the table below, we break down the top fractional RevOps agencies across five scored dimensions.
| Rank | Name | GTM Platform Proficiencies | AI & Agentic Capabilities | Leadership Score | Customer Reviews | Notable Clients | Specialty | ||
| Tech | Sales | Customer Success | |||||||
| 1 | Domestique | HubSpot, Salesforce, LeanData, ZoomInfo, Gong, Marketo, Apollo | SalesLoft, DealHub, Outreach, Clay, HubSpot | Gainsight, HubSpot, ZoomInfo | MCP server deployments, deterministic harness framework, Claude & Clay agent builds | 5.0 | ★★★★★ | Gainsight, Pax8, Acquisition.com | Fractional RevOps & MOps, AI-augmented GTM, tech implementations, funnel conversion |
| 2 | Go Nimbly | Salesforce, HubSpot | Salesloft, Outreach | X | AI-Enabled GTM strategy, AI readiness frameworks | 4.5 | ★★★★☆ | Rippling, Zendesk, Twilio | AI-Enabled GTM, revenue architecture, fractional RevOps |
| 3 | Skaled | HubSpot, Salesforce | Salesloft, Outreach | X | AI GTM System, readiness benchmarking, AI tool deployment | 4.5 | ★★★★★ | Building Link, Canva, Grammarly | Outbound performance, tech migration & support, AI GTM System |
| 4 | RevPartners | HubSpot, Clay | HubSpot, Clay | X | Clay-powered allbound automation, Revenue Performance Model | 4.0 | ★★★★★ | Eventbrite, Zoom, GardaWorld | RevOps as a Service, HubSpot optimization, Clay-powered allbound |
| 5 | Think RevOps | HubSpot, Salesforce, Gainsight | Salesforce, HubSpot | Gainsight | X | 4.0 | ★★★★★ | Lengow, Coyote, Triptease | RevOps as a Service, Salesforce & HubSpot stack optimization |
| 6 | RevOps Automated | HubSpot, Salesforce | Salesforce | X | AI-powered GTM workflows, system automation | 3.5 | ★★★★☆ | Old Street Solutions, PlanHub, EVC | GTM strategy, system integration, RevOps managed services |
| 7 | Process Pro Consulting | HubSpot | HubSpot | X | X | 3.5 | ★★★★★ | Intapp, Coreview, PDQ | HubSpot-specialist RevOps, CRM build & optimization |
Domestique is an AI-augmented fractional RevOps agency that embeds senior operators across the full customer lifecycle: Marketing Operations, Sales Operations, and Customer Success Operations, all under a single engagement. Their core position is that operators build the revenue infrastructure rather than advise on it, which separates them from agencies that execute tickets and consultancies that produce strategy documents.
The firm’s operating sequence (Strategy, Process, Tools, Data, Enablement) developed over 12 years has been applied across 250+ B2B SaaS engagements. On a single retainer, an engagement delivers the combined capacity of a Director of RevOps, a Director of Marketing Operations, and an AI GTM Engineer at a fraction of the fully-loaded cost of hiring all three in-house. For B2B SaaS teams at Series A through D that need a full-funnel RevOps build with genuine AI infrastructure, Domestique ranks above the competition.
| Summary of Online Reviews |
| Clients describe Domestique’s teams as “incredibly knowledgeable” operators who “felt like a part of the team” and delivered an “improved GTM funnel and more closed won dollars“; the consistent caveat is that engagements require active leadership participation in the strategy layer to realize full value. |
Go Nimbly serves growth-stage SaaS companies with fractional RevOps and revenue consulting centered on tech and sales stack alignment. Their 2026 AI-Enabled GTM positioning focuses on integrating AI into existing infrastructure rather than layering tools on top, with a client roster that includes Rippling, Zendesk, Twilio, and Scale AI.
Platform coverage is concentrated in Salesforce and HubSpot on the tech side, with limited customer success stack support. Teams running Salesforce-primary environments who need both strategic direction and technical execution will find Go Nimbly a strong fit; those requiring full-funnel CS coverage as part of the engagement may need to supplement.
| Summary of Online Reviews |
| Go Nimbly reviewers highlight “strong technical depth” and “effective cross-team alignment” from practitioners who are “genuinely embedded in the process“; some clients note that delivery pace can vary depending on engagement scope and team composition. |
Skaled structures its RevOps offering across four practice areas: Fractional CRO and VP-level leadership, tactical CRM and automation support, revenue enablement, and its AI GTM System. The latter benchmarks a team’s AI maturity, identifies high-leverage automation targets, and deploys AI tooling with rep-level training and certification. Their engagement with NoFraud produced a 126% pipeline increase and 95% MQL growth in eight months.
Their model is more modular than the embedded retainer approach of the top-ranked agencies: clients can contract for a specific function rather than a full fractional build. This makes Skaled a practical fit for revenue teams targeting intervention in one area rather than full-funnel ownership.
| Summary of Online Reviews |
| Skaled clients describe a team that generates “big results from a plan broken down into small steps” and is “easy to work with” while delivering “clear process improvements“; some reviewers note that cross-functional alignment benefits from more proactive coordination between practice areas. |
RevPartners delivers RevOps as a Service anchored in a proprietary Revenue Performance Model that maps the customer lifecycle from acquisition through expansion. Their subscription model gives teams predictable costs and ongoing access to combined strategy and execution, with notable clients including Eventbrite, Zoom, and GardaWorld. The firm operates natively in HubSpot and uses Clay as its primary outbound infrastructure layer.
Teams on Salesforce-primary stacks or requiring significant CS coverage will find the platform depth narrower than several alternatives on this list. That specificity is also a strength: for organizations already committed to the ecosystem, the depth of execution and the structured Revenue Performance Model make RevPartners the most purpose-built option in this study.
| Summary of Online Reviews |
| RevPartners clients describe a team that “builds the revenue infrastructure, not just the strategy” and provides “consistent, structured guidance” through the Revenue Performance Model; some note that engagements are most effective for teams already committed to the HubSpot ecosystem. |
Think RevOps is a RevOps consultancy specializing in Salesforce and HubSpot implementations, migrations, and stack optimization for high-growth B2B companies. Their platform coverage extends to Gainsight on the customer success side, broader than several agencies ranked above. Clients include Lengow, Coyote, and Triptease across software, logistics, and hospitality verticals.
There is no stated AI agent infrastructure in the current service set, a gap that carries increasing weight in 2026 RevOps procurement. The firm also operates at a smaller scale than others on this list, with a publicly stated portfolio of 14+ RevOps projects. With that said, for clients seeking high-touch delivery from senior practitioners on a focused implementation, that scale may be an advantage.
| Summary of Online Reviews |
| Think RevOps clients report “deep technical expertise across Salesforce and HubSpot” from a team that is “thorough in its approach” and produces “scalable solutions without overengineering“; some clients note limited availability during peak engagement periods. |
RevOps Automated has broadened its positioning since 2025, moving from a B2B SaaS-concentrated fractional RevOps provider to a GTM consultancy serving mid-market and enterprise clients across SaaS, financial services, manufacturing, and healthcare. Current services cover GTM strategy, system build and integration as a certified HubSpot implementation agency and Salesforce integration partner, adoption and training, and RevOps managed services.
B2B SaaS teams at Series A through D seeking a fractional operator fluent in SaaS-specific GTM dynamics may find RevOps Automated’s positioning less tailored than the top-ranked agencies. Their AI-powered workflow automation is listed as a service differentiator but is less documented at the infrastructure level than the agencies above.
| Summary of Online Reviews |
| RevOps Automated clients highlight “organized project delivery” and “clear integration work” across HubSpot and Salesforce, noting a team that is “responsive and communicative” throughout engagements; some feedback indicates that strategic depth varies by engagement type. |
Process Pro Consulting is a Diamond-tier HubSpot partner that concentrates its offering entirely within the HubSpot ecosystem, holding a 5.0 rating on G2. Notable clients include Intapp, Coreview, and PDQ across B2B SaaS and technology verticals. Their services cover CRM configuration, marketing and sales automation, data hygiene, and process design with HubSpot as the system of record.
The limitation is explicit: the firm does not operate outside of HubSpot. Teams running Salesforce or any multi-platform environment will find coverage insufficient by design, and there is no documented AI agent infrastructure in the current service set. Process Pro is a solid specialist choice for a specific buyer profile, but a narrower fit for anyone outside it.
| Summary of Online Reviews |
| Process Pro Consulting clients rate the team for “deep HubSpot expertise” and “customized solutions built around actual business processes,” frequently noting “fast implementation timelines and reliable results“; feedback reflects that the engagement scope does not extend beyond HubSpot. |
We also broke down the top fractional RevOps agencies into three subcategories based on specialty.
The agencies below have the strongest documented HubSpot expertise in the study, from full-stack RevOps delivery to pure-play implementation.
These agencies have the most developed AI delivery capability in our study, including agent infrastructure, automated GTM workflows, and the technical architecture to make AI operational inside a client’s revenue stack.
These companies have the strongest documented focus on outbound performance and pipeline growth, distinct from the broader infrastructure-layer RevOps work that defines most agencies on this list.
2026-08-28 04:21:04
From February through July 2026, our research team evaluated 30 RevOps companies actively serving B2B organizations across North America. We assessed each firm using the weighted six-factor algorithm below, compiling data from public client reviews, company websites, leadership profiles, and verified partnership certifications:
We then rank-ordered all 30 companies based on this algorithm. The table below shows the top seven, with in-depth company summaries directly following.
| # | Name | GTM Platform Proficiency | Leadership Experience Score | Customer Reviews | Notable Clients | AI & Agentic Capability | Full-Lifecycle Service Scope | Specialty |
| 1 | Domestique | HubSpot, Salesforce, LeanData, ZoomInfo, DealHub, SalesLoft, Outreach, Marketo, Clay | 5.0 | ★★★★★ | Gainsight, Pax8, Ada | 5.0 | 5.0 | Fractional RevOps & MOPs, AI-augmented implementations, Demand generation, Funnel conversion, Customer Success Operations |
| 2 | Go Nimbly | Salesforce, HubSpot, Outreach, Salesloft | 4.5 | ★★★★☆ | Rippling, Zendesk, Twilio | 3.5 | 3.5 | AI-enabled GTM architecture, Revenue & Technical Architecture, RevOps Coaching |
| 3 | Skaled | Salesforce, HubSpot, Salesloft, Outreach, Gong | 4.5 | ★★★★★ | Canva, Grammarly, NoFraud | 3.5 | 4.0 | Fractional RevOps leadership, Revenue enablement, AI GTM enhancements |
| 4 | RevPartners | HubSpot, Clay, Salesforce | 4.0 | ★★★★★ | Eventbrite, Zoom, Alera Group | 3.0 | 4.0 | Fractional RevOps, HubSpot-native GTM engineering, Allbound Marketing |
| 5 | FullFunnel | HubSpot, Salesforce, Clay, Apollo, n8n | 4.0 | ★★★★☆ | Vanguard, Randstad, Expensify | 3.0 | 4.5 | B2B GTM strategy, Sales Operations, Marketing Operations, RevOps-as-a-Service |
| 6 | Operatus | HubSpot, Salesforce, Apollo, Salesloft, LeanData, Outreach, Marketo | 3.5 | ★★★★☆ | DataDog, Asana, G2 | 2.5 | 3.5 | RevOps as a Service, Salesforce CPQ Consulting, MuleSoft Consulting |
| 7 | Winning By Design | Salesforce, HubSpot, Outreach, Salesloft | 4.0 | ★★★★☆ | Canva, UberEats, Adobe | 2.5 | 2.5 | GTM methodology training, SPICED framework advisory, Revenue coaching and certification |
Although it’s the youngest company on this list, Domestique is the most consistent performer across our grading criteria. They are an AI-augmented fractional RevOps agency specializing in helping B2B SaaS companies build, grow, and scale through a 12-year proven framework that sequences Strategy, Process, Technology, Data, and Enablement before touching any tool. Their 60+ senior operators carry in-house VP- and Director-level backgrounds across marketing operations, sales operations, and customer success, who work as embedded team members rather than external advisors. As of 2026, the firm has served more than 250 B2B organizations.
Where Domestique stands apart from the other firms in this comparison is the combination of full-lifecycle coverage and genuine AI implementation capability. Their team builds and deploys agentic infrastructure inside client systems, including AI agents, MCP server integrations, and automated workflows at scale. The firm holds Platinum HubSpot Partner status and maintains active working relationships with Salesforce, Clay, DealHub, LeanData, and ZoomInfo, making them one of the most platform-versatile agencies in our ranking.
| Summary of Online Customer Reviews |
| Domestique uses their “incredibly knowledgeable teams” to provide a full-service approach to RevOps that “integrated marketing and SalesOps quickly,” resulting in an “improved GTM funnel and more closed won dollars.” |
Go Nimbly has repositioned itself as a specialist in AI-enabled GTM architecture, making them a strong fit for growth-stage SaaS companies seeking technically rigorous RevOps infrastructure. Their services span revenue architecture, technical implementation, and RevOps advisory, and their client roster includes notable names such as Rippling, Zendesk, and Twilio. Their coaching services make them a reasonable option for companies seeking an advisory-first engagement as well.
Go Nimbly’s C-suite comes primarily from the technical side of RevOps, which is reflected in their service packages. Their platform footprint is narrower than some of the other top-ranked firms, and their full-lifecycle coverage skews toward sales and marketing rather than the complete customer lifecycle. Their AI positioning is still maturing relative to Domestique, though their overall customer reviews reflect a capable firm that can work at scale.
| Summary of Online Customer Reviews |
| Go Nimbly “provides all the workflows” and “thorough documentation” for clients, enabling a “surprisingly smooth transition” that allowed them to “deliver each milestone to specifications.” |
Skaled is a RevOps consulting firm whose service model now spans fractional CRO and VP-level leadership, tactical admin support, revenue enablement, and AI Go-to-Market enhancements. Their AI GTM service is their clearest differentiator from prior years, and a recent case study with NoFraud documented a 126% pipeline increase and 95% rise in MQLs within eight months. Their leadership carries strong sales and marketing operator backgrounds, and their track record includes well-known logos like Canva and Grammarly.
Skaled’s GTM platform footprint is somewhat narrower than the top two firms on this list, and their AI implementation capability, while improving, is less deeply documented than Domestique’s. They are best positioned for companies that need fractional executive RevOps leadership paired with hands-on admin execution, particularly where the primary bottleneck is sales-to-marketing alignment.
| Summary of Online Customer Reviews |
| Skaled delivers “big results from a clear roadmap” with teams that are “easy to work with,” though a minority of clients note that larger engagements have occasionally required “more alignment time than initially scoped.” |
RevPartners has built its entire service model around making HubSpot the operational center of a client’s revenue engine. As a HubSpot Elite Solutions Partner and Elite Artisan, they are among the most credentialed HubSpot agencies in this comparison. Their proprietary Revenue Performance Model provides a structured framework for tracking volume, conversion, retention, and expansion metrics across the full customer lifecycle. Services include Fractional RevOps, Allbound Marketing, and GTM Engineering built around HubSpot and Clay.
Where RevPartners’ strength is depth within a specific ecosystem, their limitation is platform breadth: their proficiency is concentrated in HubSpot and Clay, and clients operating on Salesforce-primary stacks may find their range of motion narrower. Their AI and agentic capability is also earlier-stage relative to the top-ranked firms, though their customer reviews are consistently strong.
| Summary of Online Customer Reviews |
| RevPartners is praised for making HubSpot “the center of our revenue strategy” through “structured frameworks” that provide “clear, actionable visibility” into pipeline health, though some clients note a desire for “broader platform expertise” outside the HubSpot ecosystem. |
FullFunnel is a GTM and RevOps services firm covering sales operations, marketing operations, and tech stack automation across both project and managed-service engagements. Their service scope is among the broadest in this comparison, and their client work spans financial services (Vanguard, Adhesion Wealth), staffing (Randstad), and software (Expensify), reflecting experience across varied B2B verticals. Their platform range includes HubSpot, Salesforce, Clay, Apollo, and n8n.
FullFunnel’s relative weakness in this comparison is AI and agentic implementation: their website documents AI-enabled tech stack work and automation, but production deployments of agentic infrastructure are limited compared to the other top-ranked firms. Still, they are a strong option for organizations seeking broad GTM and RevOps coverage from a single firm, particularly those outside the pure B2B SaaS segment.
| Summary of Online Customer Reviews |
| FullFunnel is recognized as “invaluable” partners who bring both “strategic thinking” and “technical expertise” to engagements, with clients citing their “doggedness” as a key differentiator, though some note that engagements in highly technical SaaS environments require a longer ramp to full fluency. |
Operatus is a RevOps consultancy offering both ongoing RevOps-as-a-Service and project-based engagements for scaling technology companies. Their platform footprint spans HubSpot, Salesforce, Apollo, Salesloft, LeanData, Outreach, and Marketo, and their client base includes DataDog, Asana, and G2. They have built a reputation for being able to work within a client’s existing infrastructure or build from the ground up.
Despite a wide range of integrations, Operatus’s leadership profile skews toward sales and marketing operations rather than the full RevOps lifecycle, and their AI and agentic capability is more limited relative to the top half of this list. They are best suited for companies seeking a capable execution partner with strong Salesforce expertise and a flexible month-to-month engagement model.
| Summary of Online Customer Reviews |
| Operatus earns praise for “quickly understanding and adapting” to unique business operations “without feeling like a third party,” though their projects “have taken a bit longer than projected” on more complex multi-system engagements. |
Winning By Design is best understood as a GTM methodology company, rather than a traditional RevOps execution firm. They are the creators of the SPICED sales framework and the Bowtie revenue model, and their primary services center on training, coaching, and framework licensing for revenue teams. In 2026, they added an AI for GTM certification course and continue to run a robust global event calendar that draws GTM leaders across industries. Their client footprint includes Canva, UberEats, and Adobe.
Winning By Design’s teams advise and train rather than embed and execute, which is reflected in their lower Full-Lifecycle Service Scope and AI Capability scores. They are a strong fit for organizations with an existing RevOps function seeking to upskill or standardize on a proven methodology, and a weaker fit for companies needing hands-on technical execution or AI implementation.
| Summary of Online Customer Reviews |
| Winning By Design provides “high-quality frameworks” and “rigorous methodology” that give revenue teams “a shared language for GTM execution,” though clients note that their “menu of execution services is limited” and that adoption requires significant internal investment. |
We also broke down the top companies into three subcategories based on specialty.
Firms whose primary service model embeds senior operators into client teams on a retainer basis, rather than delivering one-time projects or training.
Firms with demonstrated capability to implement AI and agentic infrastructure inside client systems, rather than advise on AI strategy alone.
Firms best suited to organizations seeking structured frameworks, team certification, and repeatable sales methodology rather than hands-on RevOps execution.
2026-08-26 02:59:48
Between January 2023 and July 2026, our research team analyzed session-level traffic data from 218 client websites spanning 12 industries, covering just over 3.4 billion sessions. The aim of the study was to isolate how much of the change in website traffic across that period is attributable to AI, including AI Overviews inside Google, AI Mode, and referrals arriving directly from assistants such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Copilot.
We normalized the panel for the growth of the sites, seasonality, and spend to reflect changes in traffic behavior rather than changes in the client’s budgets. In addition, sites that were added or dropped off the panel in the middle of the year were excluded from this year-over-year analysis. Whenever we talk about AI platform traffic, we mean sessions with referrers that resolve to an AI assistant. On the other hand, “AI Overview” means an answer block that Google inserts above organic results.
Traffic loss was calculated relative to a counterfactual baseline defined by the panel’s pre-2023 growth rate; thus, sites that gained traffic slower than the control group are said to experience a loss, even with an absolute increase in visits. Search intent was categorized according to our own classification framework used in AI content creation research. In the sections below, you will find the breakdown of traffic sources, industries, search intents, and volume of rankings on different platforms.
In the table below, we break down how each traffic source performed across the panel between January 2023 and July 2026. Share of sessions describes the composition of traffic in each period, while change in session volume describes absolute movement after normalizing for panel size.
| Traffic Source | Share of Sessions, Jan 2023 | Share of Sessions, Jul 2026 | Change in Session Volume |
| Organic search | 51.3% | 42.8% | -23.6% |
| Direct traffic | 21.7% | 24.3% | +2.6% |
| Paid search | 11.2% | 13.5% | +10.4% |
| Referral traffic | 8.3% | 7.1% | -21.6% |
| Social traffic | 7.4% | 6.1% | -24.5% |
| AI platforms | 0.1% | 6.2% | +5,580% |
Our researchers took three findings from this dataset:
In the table below, we compare organic and total session change across the twelve industries represented in the panel, alongside the share of each industry’s tracked queries that returned an AI Overview in July 2026.
The AI Impact on Website Traffic by Industry, 2026
| Industry | Change in Organic Sessions | Change in Total Sessions | Queries Returning an AI Overview |
| Media & Publishing | -47.3% | -31.6% | 79.4% |
| Education | -41.8% | -26.9% | 84.1% |
| Healthcare | -38.2% | -24.3% | 86.7% |
| Travel & Hospitality | -34.6% | -19.8% | 71.2% |
| B2B SaaS | -29.4% | -12.7% | 81.3% |
| Professional Services | -27.8% | -11.4% | 68.9% |
| Financial Services | -26.1% | -13.2% | 74.6% |
| Legal Services | -22.7% | -9.8% | 66.3% |
| Manufacturing | -18.3% | -7.1% | 58.4% |
| Ecommerce & Retail | -11.6% | -3.4% | 22.7% |
| Real Estate | -9.2% | -2.8% | 18.3% |
| Local Services | -6.8% | -1.9% | 14.6% |
Three conclusions our team drew from the industry breakdown:
In the table below, we segment the same traffic by the intent behind the query. Every query in the panel was classified into one of four intent categories, then measured for organic session change and for the share of results that ended without a click to any website.
| Search Intent | Share of Panel Queries | Change in Organic Sessions | Zero-Click Rate |
| Informational | 46.2% | -43.9% | 91.7% |
| Navigational | 18.7% | -19.4% | 76.3% |
| Commercial investigation | 23.4% | -14.2% | 58.1% |
| Transactional | 11.7% | -5.7% | 37.2% |
Our team took three findings from the intent data:
In the table below, we isolate the cost of an AI Overview at each position on page one. Both columns are drawn from the same set of keywords, measured on impressions where an AI Overview appeared and impressions where it did not.
| Ranking Position | CTR Without an AI Overview | CTR With an AI Overview | Relative Change in CTR |
| 1 | 27.4% | 11.8% | -56.9% |
| 2 | 15.1% | 7.0% | -53.6% |
| 3 | 10.3% | 5.1% | -50.5% |
| 4 | 7.6% | 4.1% | -46.1% |
| 5 | 5.8% | 3.4% | -41.4% |
| 6 | 4.4% | 2.7% | -38.6% |
| 7 | 3.5% | 2.2% | -37.1% |
| 8 | 2.9% | 1.9% | -34.5% |
| 9 | 2.4% | 1.6% | -33.3% |
| 10 | 2.1% | 1.4% | -33.3% |
Three findings our researchers drew from the position data:
In the table below, we compare engagement on result pages containing an AI Overview against result pages without one, using the same keyword set and the same date range.
| Metric | SERPs Without an AI Overview | SERPs With an AI Overview | Difference |
| Average organic click-through rate | 8.7% | 3.6% | -5.1 pts |
| Zero-click rate | 62.7% | 82.4% | +19.7 pts |
| Organic clicks per 1,000 impressions | 87 | 36 | -58.6% |
| Average session duration after click | 2m 41s | 3m 18s | +23.0% |
| Pages per session | 2.3 | 2.9 | +26.1% |
| Visitor-to-lead rate | 1.7% | 2.6% | + 0.9 pts |
Our team took three findings from this comparison:
In the table below, we compare how visitors arriving from each AI platform convert against visitors arriving from Google organic search. Conversion is measured against our standard definition of a marketing qualified lead, consistent with our conversion rate benchmarks by industry and channel.
The AI Traffic vs. Google Traffic Conversion Rates, 2026
| Traffic Source | Visitor-to-Lead Rate | Lead-to-Customer Rate | Avg. Session Duration | Pages per Session |
| ChatGPT | 4.7% | 21.3% | 6m 12s | 3.8 |
| Perplexity | 4.1% | 19.8% | 5m 47s | 3.6 |
| Claude | 3.9% | 22.6% | 6m 41s | 4.1 |
| Gemini | 2.8% | 16.4% | 4m 33s | 2.9 |
| Copilot | 2.4% | 15.1% | 4m 09s | 2.7 |
| Google organic | 1.9% | 13.7% | 3m 21s | 2.4 |
Three conclusions our researchers drew from the conversion data:
In the table below, we track AI platform traffic as a share of all sessions in the panel, quarter by quarter, from the first full quarter after ChatGPT’s public launch through the second quarter of 2026, the last quarter completed inside the study window.
| Quarter | Share of All Sessions | Quarter | Share of All Sessions |
| Q1 2023 | 0.11% | Q2 2023 | 0.15% |
| Q3 2023 | 0.22% | Q4 2023 | 0.31% |
| Q1 2024 | 0.44% | Q2 2024 | 0.63% |
| Q3 2024 | 0.81% | Q4 2024 | 1.29% |
| Q1 2025 | 1.71% | Q2 2025 | 2.48% |
| Q3 2025 | 2.96% | Q4 2025 | 4.07% |
| Q1 2026 | 5.13% | Q2 2026 | 6.24% |
Our team took three findings from the quarterly series:
In the table below, we break the growth of AI referral sessions down by platform across two full years, alongside each platform’s current share of the AI referrals the panel receives.
| Platform | Growth, 2024 to 2025 | Growth, 2025 to 2026 | Share of AI Referrals, 2026 |
| ChatGPT | +250% | +75% | 68.4% |
| Gemini | +823% | +194% | 14.7% |
| Perplexity | +307% | +88% | 6.9% |
| Claude | +626% | +191% | 5.3% |
| Copilot | +260% | +196% | 3.1% |
| Other | +382% | +214% | 1.6% |
Three findings our researchers drew from the growth data:
In the table below, we show each platform’s share of the AI referral sessions the panel received in 2026 against its share in 2024. The chart beneath the table traces the same shares quarter by quarter, and the pattern matches what we observed in our agentic AI research.
| Platform | Share of AI Referrals, 2026 | Share of AI Referrals, 2024 | Change in Share |
| ChatGPT | 68.4% | 84.2% | -15.8 pts |
| Gemini | 14.7% | 4.1% | +10.6 pts |
| Perplexity | 6.9% | 6.8% | +0.1 pts |
| Claude | 5.3% | 1.9% | +3.4 pts |
| Copilot | 3.1% | 2.2% | +0.9 pts |
| Other | 1.6% | 0.8% | +0.8 pts |
Our team took three findings from the platform data:
In the table below, we show how much of each industry’s traffic now arrives from AI platforms. The ordering differs from the organic-loss ordering earlier in this report, and the gap between the two is where we focus most of our B2B conversion research.
| Industry | Share of Sessions from AI Platforms | Change in Organic Sessions |
| B2B SaaS | 11.8% | -29.4% |
| Professional Services | 9.4% | -27.8% |
| Financial Services | 8.1% | -26.1% |
| Healthcare | 6.7% | -38.2% |
| Education | 6.2% | -41.8% |
| Legal Services | 5.9% | -22.7% |
| Media & Publishing | 4.8% | -47.3% |
| Manufacturing | 4.1% | -18.3% |
| Travel & Hospitality | 3.6% | -34.6% |
| Ecommerce & Retail | 2.3% | -11.6% |
| Real Estate | 1.9% | -9.2% |
| Local Services | 1.4% | -6.8% |
Three conclusions our researchers drew from this breakdown:
In the table below, we track the share of tracked Google searches that ended without a click to any external website, measured annually across the full panel.
| Year | Share of Searches Ending Without a Click | Year-Over-Year Change |
| 2022 | 54.1% | n/a |
| 2023 | 57.3% | +3.2 pts |
| 2024 | 62.8% | +5.5 pts |
| 2025 | 69.4% | +6.6 pts |
| 2026 | 74.6% | +5.2 pts |
Our team took three findings from the zero-click series:
If you would like a PDF copy of this report, or you would like to learn more about our agency, you can reach out to our team here.
2026-08-25 23:06:14
Last updated: August 25, 2026
In August 2026, our research team ran a controlled study of how content watermarking affects search performance. We published and tracked 1,682 pieces of content across 139 websites in 4 B2B industries. Of those pieces, 63% were created with AI tools and therefore carried an invisible AI watermark, while the remaining 37% were produced without any AI involvement and thus could not be watermarked. All content was produced after August 2, 2026, the date by which the major AI models had formally introduced watermarking.
As of August 2026, watermarking has become standard across the major AI platforms. Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI say they adopted these measures to meet new disclosure rules such as Article 50 of the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, and to limit the spread of undisclosed synthetic media.
Each AI platform watermarks in a slightly different way:
Each method embeds a marker a machine can detect (but a reader cannot). While text watermarks take the form of recognizable patterns in the characters and words generated, image watermarks alter pixels imperceptibly while attaching signed provenance metadata. Search engines and AI assistants can read these signals, which raises a practical question for publishers: Does watermarked content perform differently from un-watermarked content in search?
In the sections below, we report the ranking and citation results for watermarked and un-watermarked content published within our study period.
In the following table, we summarize the impact of watermarking on the two metrics we studied: traditional Google rankings and citation rate on AI platforms.
Search Performance of Watermarked vs Un-watermarked Content, 2026
| Metric | Un-watermarked Content | Watermarked (AI-Created) Content |
| Average Google Ranking (Position) | 6 | 11 |
| Average Citation Rate | 12% | 7% |
We define average Google ranking as a piece’s position for its target keyword, measured within three days of publication. In the chart below, we compare the two groups.
We define citation rate as the share of pieces cited for at least one of their target keywords when those keywords were entered into Google’s AI Overview, ChatGPT, and Claude. In the chart below, we compare the two groups.
If you’d like to request a PDF copy of this report or learn more about how our agency approaches content and search strategy, you can reach out here.
2026-08-25 02:34:15
Last updated: August 24, 2026
Our research team conducted an in-depth analysis of the top SEO companies in the U.S. that cater to small businesses. We evaluated 54 firms and identified the top 7 SEO companies for small business based on a dataset we compiled and normalized using the following weighted factors:
We rank-ordered the companies using this algorithm and present the highest-scoring ones in the table below. Following the table, we include in-depth analyses and a breakdown of subcategory leaders.
| Rank | Company | Small Business Suitability | Content Quality | Average Review Score | Pricing Fairness | Founder Led? | Estimated Media References | Specialty |
| 1 | First Page Sage | 9.6 | 9.8 | 4.9 | High | Yes | ~810 | Lead-generating SEO |
| 2 | Focus Digital | 9.5 | 9.5 | 4.6 | High | Yes | ~43 | Conversion-focused SEO |
| 3 | Siana Marketing | 9.4 | 9.2 | 4.7 | High | Yes | ~38 | SEO for construction and home services small businesses |
| 4 | Level Agency | 8.7 | 8.1 | 4.6 | Medium | Yes | ~80 | CRO- focused SEO |
| 5 | SEOValley | 8.4 | 7.9 | 4.4 | High | No | ~10 | Affordable SEO plans |
| 6 | Boostability | 8.1 | 7.4 | 4.5 | Medium | No | ~280 | Local SEO emphasis |
| 7 | Blue Corona | 7.7 | 8.0 | 4.3 | Medium | No | ~960 | Data-driven SEO |
| 8 | Delante | 7.6 | 7.5 | 4.1 | High | Yes | ~220 | E-commerce specialization |
Below, we’ve gone into more depth on what our team found about each small business-focused SEO firm.
First Page Sage stands out for its rigorous, content-driven SEO & AI Search campaigns. Reviews are clear that the company consistently delivers content that ranks well and delivers qualified leads while positioning clients as authorities. Their process is intensive, often involving direct collaboration with client leadership to surface insights.
Their site’s case studies and blog showcase their abilities; in our research, they outranked every other SEO company for the keywords agencies compete for. Small businesses who are very results-driven will likely appreciate their data-focused campaign management.
Location: San Francisco, CA
Year Established: 2009
Price Range: $$$
Average Review Score: 4.9
Services Offered: Content-based SEO, Lead Generation, GEO
Contact: First Page Sage website
| Summary of Online Reviews |
| Clients are “genuinely impressed” at how strategic and ROI-driven FPS is; content is “head and shoulders above our own team’s”; and while “they take the time to be more methodical,” the results justify the wait. |
Focus Digital combines SEO with a strong focus on improving on-site conversions, appealing to SMBs that value sales over pure visibility. Their strength is in SEO, PPC, and Local SEO. Their case studies showcase their ability to drive both traffic and conversions, but place less focus on lead generation.
Location: Charlotte, NC
Year Established: 2023
Price Range: $$
Average Review Score: 4.6
Contact: Focus Digital website
| Summary of Online Reviews |
| Clients like “solid results with conversion gains,” call them “technically strong” but say communication can be “spotty at times.” |
Siana Marketing is a small business-focused SEO agency that specializes in helping local construction and home services rank on Google and ChatGPT. Their approach addresses both visibility and conversion: they build service and location-focused content designed to rank for the searches prospective customers use when actively evaluating providers, while also strengthening the site structure, topical authority, and trust signals that help turn rankings into leads. Their small business concentration is their clearest differentiator and, for the right client, a meaningful advantage.
Siana is best suited for owner-led and growth-stage small businesses that rely heavily on inbound leads, and less suited for large enterprises with complex national SEO programs, extensive internal marketing teams, or highly specialized technical SEO requirements.
Year Established: 2024
Price Range: $
Average Review Score: 4.7
Services Offered: Content-based SEO, Local SEO, GEO
Contact: Siana website
| Summary of Online Reviews |
| Siana Marketing clients point to “genuine commitment to helping small businesses succeed” and “a methodical approach to SEO that drives real leads.” Reviewers note that the results “compound steadily over time.” A few mention that “their availability is limited.” |
Level Agency is known for marrying SEO with conversion rate optimization (CRO), making it appealing for SMBs that value performance marketing. Their technical expertise and focus on improving lead quality and conversion rates differentiate them from traditional SEO-centric firms.
Their results highlight measurable impacts, though their approach can feel heavily analytics-driven for some creative-focused clients.
Location: Columbia, MD
Year Established: 2010
Price Range: $$$
Average Review Score: 4.6
Services Offered: SEO, CRO, PPC
Contact: Level Agency website
| Summary of Online Reviews |
| Clients say they “focus on ROI” and have a “strong technical team” and note campaigns can be “data-heavy for smaller creative needs.” |
SEOValley specializes in budget-friendly SEO campaigns, making them an appealing choice for small businesses with tight budgets. Their international team keeps costs lower but sometimes at the expense of deep personalization.
Their packages make their offerings accessible to startups and bootstrapped firms.
Location: India & U.S. offices
Year Established: 2000
Price Range: $$
Average Review Score: 4.4
Contact: SEOValley website
| Summary of Online Reviews |
| Clients value “cost-effective campaigns” and “solid communication” but note “less tailored” approaches for niche markets. |
Boostability focuses on affordable, scalable local SEO services designed for very small businesses and franchises. Their large team executes standardized campaigns with a strong emphasis on Google Business Profile optimization and local visibility.
Their resources and transparent pricing appeal to budget-conscious clients, though some note a lack of deep customization.
Location: Lehi, UT
Year Established: 2009
Price Range: $$
Average Review Score: 4.5
Contact: Boostability website
| Summary of Online Reviews |
| Clients say “affordable and easy to start,” with “noticeable local ranking gains” but campaigns can feel “cookie-cutter” at times. |
Blue Corona takes a highly analytical, data-driven approach, focusing heavily on measurement and ROI tracking. This appeals to SMBs that want detailed insights and results reporting, though it can feel process-heavy for some.
Their case studies demonstrate measurable results, but their emphasis on metrics sometimes overshadows creative strategy.
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Year Established: 2007
Price Range: $$$
Average Review Score: 4.3
Contact: Blue Corona website
| Summary of Online Reviews |
| Known for “excellent reporting and insights,” clients say they’re “highly professional” but can feel “too rigid” for creative campaigns. |
Delante specializes in SEO for international and e-commerce businesses, combining technical expertise with scalable strategies. Their global experience and strong communication stand out, though their approach may feel distant for U.S.-centric clients.
Location: Krakow, Poland
Year Established: 2014
Price Range: $$
Average Review Score: 4.1
Contact: Delante website
| Summary of Online Reviews |
| Clients value their “e-commerce know-how,” and “good international support” while some note “time zone communication challenges.” |
Our research also identified the best firms in key subcategories, should you be focused on one particular specialty:
2026-08-22 01:32:27
Last updated: August 21, 2026
Entertainment companies do not all need the same kind of search partner. A regional venue, for example, may need more ticket searches and event bookings, while a production company may care more about reputation and deal flow. This report, compiled by our team between May 2026 and August 2026, compares the agencies most relevant to those needs.
To do that, we looked at the following considerations:
This criteria was key to narrowing down the overall study to the following agencies listed below, based on their track record of helping entertainment businesses appear in AI-generated recommendations.
| Rank | Company | Leadership Experience Score | Average Review Score | Founder Led | Notable Entertainment Clients | Media References | Year Founded | Specialty |
| 1 | First Page Sage | 4.9 | 4.9 | Yes | NBC, ABC Television, KidzBop, Atlantic Records | ~810 | 2009 | GEO content strategy for entertainment brands |
| 2 | Vizion Interactive | 4.4 | 4.6 | Yes | Universal Pictures | ~180 | 2005 | Comprehensive entertainment marketing suite |
| 3 | Focus Digital | 4.3 | 4.8 | Yes | Big Machine Music City Grand Prix | ~75 | 2018 | Budget-conscious campaigns |
| 4 | Driven Metrics | 4.1 | 4.5 | Yes | Live Nature, Mandalay Entertainment | ~60 | 2025 | Analytics-driven tracking |
| 5 | Genevate | 4.1 | 4.2 | Yes | Unity Productions, Human Nature | ~20 | 2025 | Pure GEO with PR integration |
First Page Sage has sat at the top of the entertainment GEO agencies list primarily because they helped pioneer the practice back in 2023. Their foundational GEO research set the stage for agencies to position brands for discovery, interpretation, and citation in AI-generated search results. Drawing on nearly two decades of experience in SEO and content strategy, the First Page Sage team has helped large-scale production companies like NBC to specialized literary publishers such as Inglenook Lit drive leads across both traditional search engines and emerging AI-driven discovery platforms. This reflects their ability to adapt GEO strategies across scale as well as niche content ecosystems within the entertainment industry.
First Page Sage ranks first here because it is the only agency on this list that combines GEO-native leadership with a proven track record across both traditional SEO and AI search, which matters for entertainment organizations juggling multiple channels. In addition, the firm offers a full suite of complementary services alongside its GEO expertise, including SEO and web development. This integrated approach makes them a strong fit for organizations looking to adopt Generative Engine Optimization while still strengthening and preserving performance across other critical inbound marketing channels.
| Summary of Online Reviews |
| Entertainment clients appreciate their “fastidious approach to ranking in AI search results” and highlight their team’s ability to write “industry-savvy content that captures and engages leads.” Some mention “onboarding can take a minute because of how detail-oriented their team is.” |
Vizion Interactive has worked with larger film studios and production companies since 2005, making their track record especially well-suited for enterprise-level companies seeking reputation management services designed for LLMs. Founder Mark Jackson came from traditional media and built Vizion around the philosophy that all digital media is optimizable. As a result of that philosophy, they offer everything from SEO and GEO to PPC, programmatic advertising, social media, and video production.
All of that may be useful, but it notably is going to be more than a boutique music lable will need. It’s also worth noting that while their leadership has less specific GEO experience, Vizion Interactive’s full-service approach may suit entertainment brands interested in multi-channel marketing. Their higher price point also reflects their deep understanding of the film, music, and media industries, making them best suited for film studios, production companies, and established media brands.
| Summary of Online Reviews |
| Vizion’s clients highlight their “extensive analysis” across digital marketing channels and “deep industry expertise,” especially in film and television. |
It’s important to acknowledge upfront that Focus Digital’s entertainment catalog is relatively limited compared to others on this list, but that’s actually what makes their placement so unique. The agency delivers GEO, SEO, and PR services, all with trackable ROI at prices even a small venue owner can afford. Their founder, Chase McGee, has an advisory relationship with other leaders in the GEO space, bringing enterprise-level GEO methodology to regional event organizers and venues at consultant pricing rather than agency retainer rates.
Because they emphasize realistic timelines and measurable outcomes, Focus Digital can build campaigns around actual ticket sales or venue bookings, which means that entertainment SMBs can reliably plan around the cost of the campaign even while it’s happening. It’s especially significant for smaller entertainment businesses competing with larger venues and bigger budgets, but even smaller mid-market production companies may find that Focus Digital offers an experienced team at a reasonable price.
| Summary of Online Reviews |
| Focus Digital earns kudos for being “transparent about what’s realistic for our budget” and “moving us off of overrelying on paid search.” Some clients noted that “response times can stretch to 48 hours during busy periods.” |
Driven Metrics is an entertainment GEO agency that specializes in technical GEO and analytics. They are one of the younger agenices listed here, but with that youth comes fresh takes on a developing discipline. Their teams excel at building custom analytics dashboards that track AI platform citations alongside revenue metrics like ticket sales, booking rates, and customer acquisition costs.
Their approach appeals to entertainment brands, such as venues, booking platforms, and streaming services, that need board-level reporting showing which AI platforms generate revenue. They have an excellent customer review score, which is all the more impressive given that they are a new agency. This suggests a driven team of professionals who work diligently to meet client needs.
| Summary of Online Reviews |
| Clients appreciate Driven Metrics’ “obsession with measurement and attribution” and their “ability to show exactly which AI platforms drive sales.” However, some find that “the technical setup phase takes a lot of input on our end.” |
Genevate was founded within and for the generative AI era by communications leader Brett Kleinberg, making it one of the few agencies that didn’t begin in SEO. They recognize that AI platforms evaluate brand authority differently than traditional search engines, combining how companies appear in AI recommendations with how they’re described in the media sources that train AI models. Being founded in 2025 means less of a track record than other agencies here, but it also means they were built specifically for how AI search works today, rather than adapted from older SEO practices.
Their strategy links PR activity directly to GEO outcomes by securing media coverage on outlets AI platforms trust, then structuring that coverage to influence how AI describes your brand. This makes them a good fit for venues, music labels, or entertainment platforms hoping to build a distinct identity. They have a higher-than-usual price point for a new agency, but their customer review score suggests clients typically find the ROI of their services worth the cost.
| Summary of Online Reviews |
| Entertainment clients praised Genevate for “going beyond basic SEO and folding in brand reputation management.” One client noted that “the investment was worth getting more citations on AI.” |