First Page Sage Modify

2026-09-02 04:29:19

Last updated: September 1, 2026

First Page Sage’s research team analyzed ChatGPT conversion rates across industries using anonymized data from more than 160 client companies, collected between May 2025 and September 2026. The study measured the percentage of each company’s ChatGPT referral traffic that resulted in a conversion action, as defined by that company. 

Most companies in the dataset invested in generative engine optimization (GEO) and therefore had above-industry-baseline referral traffic from ChatGPT, as well as conversion funnels tailored to that channel.

ChatGPT Conversion Rates by Industry in 2026

ChatGPT Conversion Rates: Most vs. Least Improved

The study also compared each industry’s ChatGPT conversion rate with its overall average conversion rate. The table below shows the five industries with the largest and smallest differences.

Key Findings

• ChatGPT referrals convert at higher rates than other marketing channels across every industry in the dataset. 
• Conversational AI pre-qualifies leads more effectively than keyword-based targeting, as users arrive with articulated, specific, detailed needs in natural language rather than broad search terms.
• Industries where buyers conduct extensive pre-purchase research, like hotels & resorts, higher education, entertainment, manufacturing, and legal services, show the largest conversion gains from ChatGPT. Industries with more institutionalized or relationship-driven sales processes, including engineering, heavy equipment, and financial services, show the smallest gains, though ChatGPT conversion rates remain higher than other marketing channels across all industries.

As ChatGPT usage grows and the platform expands its paid advertising capabilities, this conversion advantage over traditional search is likely to increase further.

If you’d like to request a PDF copy of this report or learn more about our GEO services, you can reach out here.

Source

2026-09-02 02:04:50

Last updated: September 1, 2026

Our team compiled data from 16 unique sources to estimate ChatGPT’s usage as of September 2026. Because each source had a different methodology for calculating usage, our model used a weighted average of all sources, with the weights based on the source’s longevity, credibility, and reputed accuracy. Further, we applied our model to the trailing 12 months to create a picture of the last year’s ChatGPT usage trend.

ChatGPT Number of Users: September 2026

The following table shares the number of unique users of ChatGPT as of Septemmber 2026. We break out standalone ChatGPT (website + app), Microsoft Copilot (which is powered by ChatGPT) and the combination of both. Afterwards, we share the 12 month trend.

	ChatGPT* *excluding Copilot	Microsoft Copilot	ChatGPT Total
Users	853 million	111 million	904 million
Visits	6.1 billion	1.3 billion	6.4 billion
AI Search Market Share	52.6%	1.3%	60.5%
Estimated Quarterly User Growth	4% ▲	3% ▲	4% ▲
12 Month Trend

ChatGPT Total Monthly Users: 12 Month Trend (September 2026)

ChatGPT Market Share: September 2026

Below you can see the trend of ChatGPT’s market share over the past 12 months. Overall it remains fairly stagnant; while overall usage is growing well, competition from other generative AI chatbots continues to increase. Notably, Google’s recent Gemini update has been very well received and has seen increased usage compared to previous months.

ChatGPT Market Share: 12 Month Trend (September 2026)

ChatGPT Competitor Market Share: Septemmber 2026

Below you will find the market share trend of ChatGPT’s competitors. ChatGPT remains the market leader by a wide margin even as relative upstarts like Claude rapidly gain in market share.

ChatGPT Competitor Market Share: 12 Month Trend (September 2026)

ChatGPT Use Cases: September 2026

Below we have published the breakdown of how people are using ChatGPT. The largest use case is general research, followed by academic research. There are 26 other cases in the “Other” category.

ChatGPT Use Cases: 12 Month Trend (September 2026)

ChatGPT Retention Rate by Subscription Tier

We looked at a cohort of subscribers from January 2025 through June 2026 and estimated subscription retention rate retention based on self-reporting at the 3 month, 6 month, and 1 year marks. 

ChatGPT Visitor Share by Country: September 2026

The table below lists the top countries in the world by share of ChatGPT visits. The US and India represent the largest visitor bases in the world, followed by Brazil at a distant third.

ChatGPT Visitor Share by Country (September 2026)

ChatGPT Purchasing Trends: Septemmber 2026

In the table below, we have published the top industries in which customers are using ChatGPT to assist with making purchases. While at most 47% of the members of an industry use ChatGPT in their purchasing journey, that number has increased in each of the last 10 months.

Top Industries Using ChatGPT to Make Purchases (September 2026)

Requesting a Copy of This Report

If you’d like a pdf copy of this report, you can reach out here.

Related Reading

• Top Generative AI Chatbots by Market Share
• Which Industries Use Generative AI To Make Purchases?
• ChatGPT Optimization: 2026 Guide
• Generative Engine Optimization (GEO): Explanation & Algorithm Breakdown
• Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) Strategy Guide

Source

2026-09-02 01:17:03

Last Updated: September 1, 2026

Our team tracked the generative AI chatbot market share across major AI platforms. For this study, “generative AI chatbot” refers to LLM-based web and mobile applications that the public uses to seek answers or create content. All figures are estimated based on monthly active users across U.S. web and mobile platforms.

The Top Generative AI Chatbots by Market Share – September 2026

ChatGPT still dominates U.S. usage, holding a larger share than all other chatbots combined. Google Gemini and Claude follow at a distance; together, the top three account for the overwhelming majority of the market, a measure of how concentrated AI usage remains despite the steady flow of new entrants. Grok has maintained relatively steady usage, outpacing Perplexity, but it is still far behind the major platforms.

The defining trend is gradual fragmentation: ChatGPT’s lead, though still commanding, has narrowed as users adopt more tools. If the pattern holds, its share looks set to keep declining. However, it is unlikely to collapse. Some projections have ChatGPT stabilizing close to the 50–55% range as casual users migrate, while its core base stays put.

The Fastest Growing Generative AI Chatbots

The following table ranks generative AI chatbots by their quarterly change in estimated users. Most of this quarter’s growth was driven by product launches, but that momentum tends to plateau once the launch cycle ends.

Fastest Growing Generative AI Chatbots – September 2026

¹DeepSeek posted the quarter’s most notable growth relative to its size, driven by the April 24 launch of DeepSeek V4, an affordable open-source frontier model. That cost efficiency is attracting developers and organizations priced out of proprietary alternatives.

²Grok and Perplexity remain well behind the top platforms in absolute scale.

³Meta AI’s numbers remain unverifiable as a standalone chatbot. Its user count spans passive social-feed interactions across WhatsApp, Instagram, and Facebook, which are not comparable to active chatbot sessions.

ChatGPT Market Share: 2026 Trend

The table below shows ChatGPT’s year-to-date 2026 market-share trend in the generative AI chatbot space. As the pioneer and market leader, ChatGPT has the most ground to lose, and its share has declined as smaller competitors attract more users. Even so, the platform grew 4% this quarter, supported by the rollout of GPT-5.5 Instant as the default model. The launch may help ChatGPT retain its core user base and limit further market-share losses in the months ahead.

NOTE: ChatGPT’s market share includes that of Bing’s Copilot product, as they both use the same underlying system; the difference is only that Microsoft Copilot personalizes ChatGPT based on user data in the Microsoft ecosystem.

Microsoft Copilot Market Share: 2026 Trend

Microsoft Copilot’s market share followed a dip-and-recovery arc through the first half of 2026. Although Copilot posted the quarter’s slowest growth at +3%, its trajectory improved over the period. Momentum picked up in early summer, with Scout launching at Build, Copilot Cowork reaching general availability, and Claude becoming available in select Copilot experiences.

Google Gemini Market Share: 2026 Trend

Google Gemini opened the year roughly flat. In May, Google introduced Gemini Spark, an always-on agentic assistant, and cut the entry price of its AI Ultra tier to $99.99 a month to broaden access. Gemini then made a notable leap from June to July, most likely due to its integration into Android devices and Gmail. As of July 2026, Google Gemini has 950 million monthly active users.

Perplexity Market Share: 2026 Trend

Perplexity gave up ground through early 2026 as larger general-purpose assistants folded answer and search features into their own apps, eroding the advantage of a standalone answer engine. The decline has continued, leaving Perplexity’s consumer share well below where it began the year, even as its enterprise and revenue base has kept growing.

ClaudeAI Market Share: 2026 Trend

Claude’s share dipped from 11.5% in June to 10.3% in July. The June 9 launch of Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5 helped support momentum, although Anthropic disabled both models on June 12 under a U.S. export-control directive. Fable 5 access was restored on July 1, while Mythos 5 remains restricted.

The July dip may reflect intensifying competition rather than weakening demand. As ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, and other AI assistants release new models and capabilities in quick succession, users may be experimenting across multiple platforms rather than focusing on a single chatbot.

Requesting a Copy of This Report

If you’d like a PDF copy of this report, you can reach out here.

Related Reading

• Generative Engine Optimization (GEO): Explanation & Algorithm Breakdown
• Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) Strategy Guide
• Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) Cost Breakdown
• ChatGPT Optimization: 2026 Guide
• Perplexity AI Optimization: Ranking Factors and Strategy

Source

2026-08-29 08:39:56

We recently sat down with Zach Gardner, Chief Architect at Keyhole Software, a top-rated custom software development firm for mid-size to enterprise organizations across the United States.

First Page Sage’s readers spend their days thinking about growth: pipeline, brand, and increasingly, how AI fits into both. Marketing teams are adopting AI faster than almost any other function, often without the engineering guardrails that keep it reliable. Zach has spent more than a decade leading modernization and AI-accelerated delivery for clients in financial services, healthcare, and manufacturing, and he shared what that experience has taught him about AI adoption that holds up in production, not just in a demo.

First Page Sage: Marketing teams are under real pressure to show results from AI. What separates AI adoption that produces durable results from adoption that quietly creates risk?

Zach Gardner: The difference is governance, not the model per se. Every vendor demo shows the happy path, but production is where AI meets bad data, edge cases, and 100 different people asking the same question 100 different ways. In my experience, durable AI adoption means you have a sufficient amount of real tests that you’ve ran against it in your most common personas, as well as have a plan for how to watch the real world usage of the system. Risky adoption is any setup where nobody can tell you who checks the AI’s work, or when.

I tell clients to treat an AI tool like a new hire. You would never let a new employee send customer emails or change pricing on day one. You define its constraints, decide what data it can see, and name the person who reviews its work before it acts. Keyhole’s consultants are 100% U.S.-based senior engineers averaging 17+ years of experience¹, and that experience is exactly what tells you where a review path is essential and where it is just friction. That judgment call is the whole game.

Teams that skip that step do not find out right away. They find out after something has already gone out the door with their brand on it.

First Page Sage: What are the most common mistakes you see when organizations bolt AI onto their existing systems and workflows?

Gardner: Four come up constantly. Black-box tools nobody can explain. Fragmented data feeding the model, which produces confident wrong answers. No human checkpoint on decisions with financial or brand weight. And no versioning of models or prompts, so behavior drifts silently.

Drift is the one marketing leaders underestimate most. The tool that wrote on-brand copy in March writes something different in June, because the vendor updated the model underneath it, and nobody notices because nobody is watching for it. Application code gets version control and release notes. The model making customer-facing decisions often gets neither, and when someone asks how the system behaved three months ago, there is no answer.

We have supported 250+ clients of all sizes², and these patterns show up everywhere: in claims platforms, in logistics systems, and just as often in a martech stack. The technology changes; the failure modes do not.

First Page Sage: Marketing runs on data: CRM, analytics, content libraries. How should leaders get their data ready before leaning on AI and agentic tools?

Gardner: AI is only as good as the data and integrations behind it. Messy, siloed data does not make AI fail loudly. It makes it wrong quietly, which is worse, because the output still sounds confident.

Before leaning on agentic features, you should be able to answer three questions. Where does each data source live, and who owns it? Which systems is the AI allowed to touch, and where are the boundaries? What access does it actually need, rather than what is convenient to grant? That is the same readiness work we do in custom software development before any AI integration, and it is not glamorous, but it is where reliability is actually decided.

There is a privacy dimension, too. Many AI tools route your data through third-party infrastructure by default. Before an agentic tool touches your CRM, you should know exactly where that customer data goes and what the vendor is allowed to do with it. In our enterprise AI work, we design systems that keep sensitive data inside the client’s own environment, and marketing data deserves the same posture. Given that we work in so many different verticals and domains, I have to be well versed and able to explain how constraints like GDPR and HIPAA come into play with what can and can’t be done with AI.

First Page Sage: Keyhole builds software with AI coding agents in the loop. How do you keep that reliable, and what can non-engineering teams borrow from your approach?

Gardner: Our model is AI-accelerated, architect-governed delivery with test-gated workflows³. Agentic tools generate real work, but nothing reaches production without passing automated tests and senior architect review. The constraints come first, then the generation: I define the runtime, the data shape, and the targets before the AI writes anything.

Keyhole was invited to the 2026 Anthropic Partner Summit⁴, which reflects the way we build governed delivery pipelines around tools like Claude Code rather than treating AI as an unsupervised shortcut. The speed gains are real, but they only stay real because a disciplined process is wrapped around them. I had some great conversations there with people that I would have never met otherwise, and it was heartening to find out that we’re all experiencing about the same things in the same ways.

Non-engineering teams can copy the shape of this without any of the tooling. Define the guardrails and the review gate before you turn the tool on, not after. And when you evaluate any AI platform, ask the vendor to show their audit trail and human checkpoints. If they cannot, that tells you what you need to know.

First Page Sage: For a marketing or growth leader with no engineering team behind them, where should AI adoption actually start?

Gardner: Start with an inventory: where would AI touch money, customers, or your brand, and who is accountable at each of those points? That inventory becomes the foundation for everything else, because it shows you where the cost of being wrong is low and where it is high.

Then sequence accordingly. Adopt first where mistakes are cheap, like internal research, first drafts, and summarization. Keep humans in the loop where mistakes are expensive, like anything customer-facing, contractual, or priced. As your controls and confidence mature, you expand the AI’s territory deliberately, the same way you would expand a new team member’s responsibilities.

Finally, be selective about who you bring in for the integrations that off-the-shelf tools do not cover. Continuity and judgment matter more than the newest technology pitch. Roughly 78% of our project work last year came from repeat clients⁵, and our consultants average nearly 5 years of tenure with Keyhole⁶. The organizations we see succeed with AI are not the ones moving fastest. They are the ones who know exactly what their AI is allowed to do, and who can prove it behaves before they raise the stakes.

To learn more about Keyhole Software, visit keyholesoftware.com.

Source

2026-08-28 22:56:55

Fintech buyers are increasingly relying on AI agents to research, compare, and purchase on their behalf. Being chosen by these agents requires a different approach than being cited in a chatbot’s response. Agentic Search Optimization (ASO), for example, focuses on being selected by agents that execute tasks and transactions. Whereas GEO (generative engine optimization) influences what a person reads, ASO determines the decisions agents make for users. As a result, significantly fewer agencies specialize in ASO.

To identify the top fintech agentic search optimization agencies, our team evaluated 61 firms with fintech experience between June 2025 and July 2026, scoring each on six weighted factors:

• Average Review Score (25%): Verified client ratings and testimonials pulled across Google, Clutch, and G2.
• Agentic Visibility Score (25%): A 1.0 to 5.0 read on how consistently an agency’s clients get selected or displayed when autonomous agents and AI assistants such as Copilot, Brave, and Gemini research, compare, and act on a user’s behalf. 
• ASO Expertise (20%): Practical command of how autonomous agents discover, evaluate, and choose providers when carrying out tasks, and how to make a client’s option the one they select. 
• Fintech Expertise (15%): A 1.0-5.0 measure of real work with lenders, banks, payments, and wealth brands, including comfort with compliance-bound content.
• Leadership Experience (10%): How much search and generative-optimization pedigree the senior team brings, rated 1.0-5.0.
• Notable Clients (5%): Financial and fintech accounts strong enough to signal enterprise-grade delivery. 

We then ranked each agency by weighted score and selected the seven strongest for the list below. 

The Top Fintech Agentic Search Optimization (ASO) Agencies of 2026

First Page Sage

First Page Sage is a fintech ASO agency specializing in lead generation for mid-market and emerging brands. Their in-house team of subject-matter experts has extensive experience across fintech and related sectors, including payments, lending, banking, and wealth management. For 18 years, the agency has produced content based on expert interviews and proprietary data, structuring it for autonomous agents to easily parse, trust, and act upon. This first-party approach directly targets how AI agents recommend providers..

First Page Sage has worked with many leading fintech brands, building a strong client portfolio. Similarly, their proficiency in complex regulatory environments and their pioneering role in defining agentic search optimization make them an ideal choice for fintech companies seeking proven industry experts.

• Average Review Score: 4.9
• Agentic Visibility Score: 4.9
• ASO Expertise: 5.0
• Fintech Expertise: 4.8
• Leadership Experience: 4.7
• Notable Clients: US Bank, Nerdwallet, defi SOLUTIONS 
• Specialization: Market-leading ASO for regulated fintech
• Contact: First Page Sage

Genevate

Genevate establishes authority externally by securing third-party mentions and credibility signals that agents consider when evaluating providers. Rather than building content on a client’s own site, the agency focuses on earned placements: expert commentary, industry roundups, podcast appearances, and coverage on the trusted publications and directories that autonomous agents weigh when deciding which providers to surface. This external-first strategy results in the second-highest AI Visibility and ASO Expertise scores in the study.

Genevate demonstrates strong ASO capabilities for a young firm. Their limited track record reflects their recent entry to the market. However, their established fintech clients and high average review rating make them a credible choice for companies looking to build a core PR program that carries weight with both AI agents and human readers.

• Average Review Score: 4.8
• Agentic Visibility Score: 4.6
• ASO Expertise: 4.8
• Fintech Expertise: 4.5
• Leadership Experience: 4.4
• Notable Clients: Equiniti, Talech, Payoneer 
• Specialization: Digital PR and third-party authority building 
• Contact: Genevate 

Driven Metrics

Driven Metrics is built around proof. Each engagement is linked to leads and revenue, with weekly reporting that ties content performance directly to pipeline. Their services center on conversion-focused content, ongoing optimization, and attribution tracking, and any content that does not convert is revised until it does. This disciplined, results-first approach extends to their pricing, which is typically lower than firms with similar output.

In terms of results, only First Page Sage and Genevate rank higher in ASO expertise. However, Driven Metrics’ experience is concentrated in a few industries, so fintech brands outside these areas should anticipate a brief onboarding period. The benefit is an agency that provides transparency at every stage.

• Average Review Score: 4.8
• Agentic Visibility Score: 4.2
• ASO Expertise: 4.5
• Fintech Expertise: 4.3
• Leadership Experience: 4.3
• Notable Clients: SeamlessChex, Advisors Excel 
• Specialization: Proof-first reporting tied to leads and revenue 
• Contact: Driven Metrics

Focus Digital

Focus Digital uses a performance marketing approach, creating organized comparison content to help agents evaluate providers. This complements their existing paid and organic performance services.

Focus Digital demonstrates strong AI visibility. However, their fintech expertise is somewhat limited compared to some other options on this list, with their primary focus remaining fixed on healthcare,  consumer sectors and early-stage financial accounts. Regulated-niche brands should anticipate close collaboration at the outset, and response times may slow during peak periods. The agency offers effective content across both AI and organic search channels, with pricing below typical enterprise retainers.

• Average Review Score: 4.7
• Agentic Visibility Score: 4.4
• ASO Expertise: 4.4
• Fintech Expertise: 4.3
• Leadership Experience: 4.1
• Notable Clients: SoFi, Skeps, Credit Sesame 
• Specialization: Comparison-page content across AI and organic search
• Contact: Focus Digital

CSTMR

CSTMR (pronounced “customer”) specializes exclusively in fintech and financial services. Founded in Austin by experienced financial brand professionals, the agency offers deep expertise in lending, banking, payments, insurance, and investing. CSTMR also holds a SOC 2 certification, which is uncommon among marketing firms.

CSTMR delivers strong results in brand, strategy, and conversion-focused design. However, their ASO capabilities are less robust than other options on this list, as their primary offering appears to largely consist of GEO and other generative-oriented services. For rebranding or comprehensive growth initiatives, CSTMR remains one of the top fintech-native agencies on this list.

• Average Review Score: 4.4
• Agentic Visibility Score: 3.9 
• ASO Expertise: 3.7 
• Fintech Expertise: 4.6
• Leadership Experience: 4.2
• Notable Clients: Kudzu, ValidMind
• Specialization: Fintech-exclusive brand and conversion strategy
• Contact: CSTMR

Obility

Obility is a Portland-based B2B growth agency recognized for their expertise in paid and organic search, an in-house revenue operations team, and a portfolio of prominent technology clients. The agency has expanded into ASO and now serves fintech clients, demonstrating strong leadership and a reputable client base.

The in-house RevOps team is a key strength, integrating paid, organic, and pipeline attribution into a unified program. Obility ranks sixth because ASO is part of a broader demand-generation practice rather than a primary focus, and the agency specializes more in B2B technology than fintech. However, for long-cycle B2B fintech companies, this integrated approach is well-suited.

• Average Review Score: 3.9
• Agentic Visibility Score: 3.5
• ASO Expertise: 3.9
• Fintech Expertise: 4.0
• Leadership Experience: 4.4
• Notable Clients: Finzr, Moove
• Specialization: B2B demand generation with in-house RevOps 
• Contact: Obility

Bay Leaf Digital

Since 2013, Bay Leaf Digital has specialized in B2B SaaS marketing from Arlington, Texas, with expertise in SEO, content, and demand generation. The agency is experienced in fintech, logistics, and cybersecurity. Clients value their accountability and comprehensive approach to metrics. Their long-standing presence and consistent positive reviews reflect strong leadership and client satisfaction.

Bay Leaf Digital delivers reliable SEO, content, and demand-generation services, backed by proven SaaS experience. However, they lack as robust an ASO track record as other options on this list, with case studies focused on lead generation rather than agentic outcomes. As a result, their AI Visibility and ASO expertise are limited. For core B2B SaaS needs, they remain a dependable and accountable partner.

• Average Review Score: 4.0
• Agentic Visibility Score: 3.5
• ASO Expertise: 3.5
• Fintech Expertise: 4.1
• Leadership Experience: 4.3
• Notable Clients: MeazureUp, Truefort, DocketScope
• Specialization: B2B SaaS content and demand generation 
• Contact: Bay Leaf Digital

Source

2026-08-28 22:52:26

Generative engine optimization (GEO) is the practice of shaping content so that large language models like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok recommend your company in response to commercial queries. The practice relies heavily on developing both trust and authority for your brand over time, a difficult process that few agencies excel at.

To find the agencies doing it best, our team analyzed 41 AI search optimization agencies with financial services and fintech experience between March 2024 and June 2026, scoring each on a weighted model:

• Average Review Score (20%): Aggregate 1.0-5.0 rating across review platforms and verified testimonials.
• AI Placement Score (25%): A proprietary 1.0-5.0 metric for how consistently an agency gets clients cited in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google’s AI Overviews.
• Notable Clients (20%): Recognizable brands that signal enterprise-level delivery.
• GEO Expertise (20%): Hands-on command of how LLMs retrieve and cite content.
• Financial Services Expertise (15%): A 1.0-5.0 score for demonstrated depth serving banks, fintechs, and lenders, including fluency with compliance-sensitive content.
• Team Pedigree (15%): A 1.0-5.0 score for the caliber of the agency’s whole bench, from the founders’ track record to the search, GEO, and domain credentials across the wider team. 

After compiling and aggregating the dataset, our team rank-ordered all agencies and selected the eight highest-scoring for inclusion below. Where overall scores are equal, agencies are ranked by the strength of notable clients, as assessed by our research team. 

The Top Financial Services GEO Agencies of 2026 

First Page Sage

First Page Sage established GEO as a discipline in 2023 by publishing early research on how generative engines select sources and by releasing one of the first GEO strategy guides in 2024 (which it has updated annually) that is now widely referenced in the industry. This early leadership supports a method based on expert-authored content that maintains brand credibility with both compliance reviewers and AI models in the finance sector.

First Page Sage’s high AI Placement and GEO Expertise scores demonstrate a program built for sustained, long-term lead generation as generative AI evolve. This expertise extends to financial content, where the team leverages industry knowledge to create expert-level material, viewing compliance requirements and audience expectations as strategic inputs. Finance brands that approach organic lead generation as a multi-quarter investment achieve the strongest results.

• Average Review Score: 4.9
• AI Placement Score: 4.9
• GEO Expertise: 5.0
• Financial Services Expertise: 4.8
• Team Pedigree (15%): 4.7
• Notable Clients: Capital One, Salesforce, U.S. Bank, BAM Capita, Canyon View Capital
• Specialty: Full-service GEO and SEO for financial services lead generation
• Contact: First Page Sage

Genevate

Genevate treats AI discoverability as a PR problem first and a technical one second. Founder Brett Kleinberg came out of New York PR, and the firm’s central move is to engineer the third-party authority signals that generative engines lean on when deciding whose name to platform. It has built a credible foothold in commercial real estate finance on the strength of that approach.

It lands second on the strength of that method. Its AI Placement and GEO Expertise scores are among the highest here, reflecting real command of the authority signals AI engines reward. The main concern is their tenure. The firm is young, and its review base is thin, so a finance buyer is backing the approach more than a long track record, and for a brand willing to bet on method over history, few here execute it better.

• Average Review Score: 4.8
• AI Placement Score: 4.6
• GEO Expertise: 4.8
• Financial Services Expertise: 4.2
• Team Pedigree (15%): 4.4
• Notable Clients: Payoneer, defi Solutions
• Specialty: GEO and earned media for financial services and commercial real estate brands
• Contact: Genevate website

Driven Metrics

Driven Metrics is the accountability-first option here, tying its reporting to leads and revenue rather than traffic, and rebuilding content that fails to convert rather than excusing it. While they provide GEO services, they specialize in SEO, working closely with financial services companies to generate leads via traditional search. Their evidence-led habit, however, shapes their GEO work as much as their SEO work, undercutting most firms doing comparable work at lower prices.

Driven Metrics has successfully managed campaigns for financial services companies at varying scales. Their use case as a generalist may be a liability for financial services companies seeking a more pureplay option, their proven knowledge of GEO and financial services will meet the needs of anyone seeking GEO as a supplementary service to a more traditional SEO campaign.

• Average Review Score: 4.8
• AI Placement Score: 4.2
• GEO Expertise: 4.5
• Financial Services Expertise: 4.3
• Team Pedigree (15%): 4.3
• Notable Clients: Equiniti, SeamlessChex
• Specialty: Analytics-driven GEO and SEO for growing businesses
• Contact: Driven Metrics

Focus Digital

Focus Digital comes to GEO from a performance marketing background, building pages that are quotable by AI systems. At the same time, they climb organic rankings, a technical range that is all the more impressive given the company’s lean size. For a finance brand looking to cover both channels without an enterprise retainer, it is one of the more budget-friendly options here.

That dual-channel range is where Focus excels, covering AI citations and organic rankings simultaneously for a fraction of an enterprise retainer fee. It lands fourth because its deepest work lies in healthcare and consumer categories, with finance still emerging in its portfolio. Specialized niches should expect closer oversight early on, and reviews note that responsiveness can slip when the team is stretched. For a finance brand that wants both channels from one capable team without overpaying, though, few here offer better value.

• Average Review Score: 4.7
• AI Placement Score: 4.4
• GEO Expertise: 4.4
• Financial Services Expertise: 4.3
• Team Pedigree (15%):4.1
• Notable Clients: TALtech
• Specialty: Budget-friendly GEO and SEO for growing finance brands
• Contact: Focus Digital website

Avenue Z

Avenue Z has pushed hard into AI optimization, launching one of the first packaged GEO solutions in 2025 under founder Jeffrey Herzog, the iCrossing founder and a genuine search pioneer, anchoring a team with deeper search credentials than anyone else on this list. Finance sits among its core verticals alongside private equity and venture capital, and its PR-and-authority model maps cleanly onto the way AI platforms assess trust.

That breadth is its own asset, giving finance clients integrated PR, influence, and performance media most GEO specialists can’t touch. It ranks below those specialists because GEO is one capability in that wide offering, and finance one vertical among consumer, tech, and web3, so its lower AI Placement and GEO Expertise scores reflect that a brand focused purely on citation volume will get more concentrated work from a GEO-only firm. For an institution that wants GEO/AEO within a broader strategy, though, Avenue Z’s range is hard to match. 

• Average Review Score: 4.5
• AI Placement Score: 3.9
• GEO Expertise: 3.7
• Financial Services Expertise: 4.6
• Team Pedigree (15%): 4.2
• Notable Clients: Promoteo, Budclub, Dave
• Specialty: Integrated PR, GEO, and performance media for finance and fintech
• Contact: Avenue Z

Mint Studios

Mint Studios is a content marketing agency focused solely on financial services and fintech, founded in 2019 by Araminta Robertson. Its model is built around regulated messaging and writers who already understand financial products, and it has put that to work across its fintech client base, with SEO and GEO now core acquisition channels for them.

That focus on regulated financial content is a genuine strength, and few here write for compliance-heavy fintech as fluently. It sits sixth on the scale and in AI-specific depth because Mint is a boutique with a small team and a light media footprint, and GEO is layered onto a content core rather than run as a full-service GEO and reputation practice, which is reflected in its lower AI Placement and GEO Expertise scores. For a fintech that values domain fluency over broad AI-search machinery, though, that focus is the point.

• Average Review Score: 4.6
• AI Placement Score: 3.4
• GEO Expertise: 3.5
• Financial Services Expertise: 3.9
• Team Pedigree (15%): 4.4
• Notable Clients: Yapily, Jeeves, Zai, Fintel Connect
• Specialty: Fintech-exclusive content marketing and GEO
• Contact: Mint Studios

Evara (Formerly Inbound FinTech)

Evara, until recently Inbound FinTech, is a London-based agency (with a New York branch) built exclusively for financial services and fintech, founded by Sheila Mitham. As a HubSpot Diamond Partner with deep RevOps and CRM expertise, it knows the compliance demands and long sales cycles that define financial marketing, making it a strong fit for finance brands already living in the HubSpot ecosystem.

Where Evara is strong, it is genuinely strong, pairing deep expertise in HubSpot, CRM, and RevOps with real fluency in financial compliance. It ranks last because GEO is the newest, most peripheral part of that offering. Its core strengths in CRM, RevOps, and inbound search, rather than generative search, are reflected in its lower AI Placement and GEO Expertise scores. At the same time, the recent rebrand means buyers weighing track record should confirm how the transition affects its case studies and references. For a finance brand already in HubSpot that wants inbound and GEO under one roof, though, few here fit as naturally.

• Average Review Score: 4.7
• AI Placement Score: 3.3
• GEO Expertise: 3.4
• Financial Services Expertise: 4.0
• Team Pedigree (15%): 4.4
• Notable Clients: Moneycorp, Iwoca, YouLend, Caxton 
• Specialty: HubSpot RevOps and inbound GEO for financial services brands
• Contact: Evara

Croton Content

Croton Content works one angle no one else on this list does: video. Founded by Daniel Schoester and built exclusively for financial brands, the agency produces evergreen YouTube funnels engineered to remain indexed by both search engines and AI answer engines, wrapped in compliance-first content structured around FINRA and SEC framing. In a field where nearly everyone optimizes written pages, treating video as a citable source for AI answers is a genuinely different bet, and its bylines in Forbes Advisor and Moneywise demonstrate the editorial credibility behind it.

This video-first specialization is a significant strength, providing an AI citation channel that text-focused agencies lack. Croton Content ranks eighth because its narrow focus limits content formats and serves a boutique client base, rather than offering the comprehensive GEO and reputation services provided by top competitors. However, for finance brands seeking to leverage video and YouTube answers for AI citations, Croton Content is uniquely well-positioned.

• Average Review Score: 4.5
• AI Placement Score: 3.6
• GEO Expertise: 3.5
• Financial Services Expertise: 4.1
• Team Pedigree (15%): 4.0
• Notable Clients: MoneyWise, Forbes Advisor
• Specialty: Video-first AEO and GEO for financial brands 
• Contact: Croton Content

Source