MoreRSS

site iconBear Blog Trending PostsModify

Ranked according to the following algorithm:Score = log10(U) + (S / D * 8600), U is Upvotes , S/D is time.
Please copy the RSS to your reader, or quickly subscribe to:

Inoreader Feedly Follow Feedbin Local Reader

Rss preview of Blog of Bear Blog Trending Posts

being rude anonymously online

2026-04-10 05:06:00

what if - hear me out - WHAT IF we don't send rude messages to strangers online? Yes, Bob (?), I'm talking to you. I don't mean to sound crazy, but sometimes it's ok just to think.


(unless you're Bob, the one who sent me the rude message)

My First Blog Post

2026-04-10 02:10:00

I have been wanting to write a blog for a long time now. About three years ago, I discovered Flavio Copes who used to write bite-sized blog posts every day. I did not really read his posts that much, but his habit of writing everyday was what I liked. It gave me the urge to start writing blog posts of my own on what I was learning at the time. This was also the first time I learned about static site generators (Hugo) as his site was made using this.

Later, when I searched for more blogs similar to his, I found Herman. I was really impressed by his Bear Blog. At that time, I didn't have a way to buy the subscription to Bear. So I just made my own site with Hugo, trying to make it look like Bear. But I never wrote anything on it.

I think I did not write because English is not my first language. I also have a problem with perfectionism. I spend too much time thinking and not enough time doing. I also did not know who would read my posts, so I just stopped.

The last three years were very difficult for me. I had no job and I was in debt. I almost dropped out of my studies too (I took a 4 years break). But now I am trying to build my life again. I am still a bit lazy sometimes, but I am making progress every day.

I found Bear blog again recently. This time I saw the Discover page and the community. I like that people just share their thoughts here. I do not use social media and I am careful about what I share online, but I want to be part of this community. So, this is my first post. It took a long time, but I am finally starting.

_

Reply via email

Bluesky is not trustworthy or sustainable. Mastodon is

2026-04-10 01:50:15

I saw Dave Lee's post quoting James Ball's post about fears around Bluesky's lack of user growth, and therefore profitability and sustainability. It's a company with hundreds of millions of dollars invested into it - the platform will inevitably enshittify in an effort to pay back its investors.

To that, I suggest Mastodon. It's a social platform like Twitter, Bluesky, and Threads, but with a few key differences.

It's open source

This means there's no secret data exfiltration or surveillance taking place. We, the community, can audit the source code and provide feedback, features, and bug fixes. This leads to a more involved community and greater trust between users and developers.

Being open source also has huge implications for the long-term sustainability for the platform. If the developers behind Mastodon were to eventually get acquired by a corporation or prove themselves untrustworthy stewards, the application can be forked and development continued by more trustworthy people. In fact, there are already third-party alternatives like Sharkey, GoToSocial, and Snac. They all speak the same language, enabling users of Sharkey to interact with users of Mastodon, users of Snac to interact with users of GoToSocial, and so on. This is called "federation" and will be explained more in the next section.

It's decentralized

Because Mastodon is open source, with the right amount of technical know-how, anyone can host their own instance. An instance is just a computer running the Mastodon server application. Under the hood, Mastodon uses the ActivityPub protocol for federation with other instances. So even if you're the only person on your Mastodon instance, you can still talk to your friends on other instances!

Fun fact: Threads also uses ActivityPub, so people on both Threads and Mastodon can interact with each other!

This means that you can choose which provider you want to go with, from the biggest instance, mastodon.social, to any of the smaller instances with only a few users. You can pick and choose based on the existing community, or find an instance whose moderation rules and admin team you most agree with and trust. If you have the know-how, you can even host an instance for just you (and your friends!), meaning you'll only be subject to your own moderation rules.

This decentralization is also a big deal for data sovereignty. For example, if you want to avoid U.S.-based services, or you can find a Mastodon instance that is based somewhere else, like the EU or Canada.

And no, despite Bluesky's marketing, Bluesky is not decentralized. Like, at all.

There is no algorithm

Mastodon feeds are chronological, so there isn't an algorithm constantly trying to maximize engagement and overwhelm you. Instead, popular posts get shared by way of boosts (Mastodon's term for retweets or reposts). This has the downside of your feed feeling empty when you first join. However, you can find people to interact with and follow with the local feed (posts from just your instance), federate feed (posts from all federated instances), and by following hashtags for topics you are interested in. Plus, you can add users and hashtags to lists, letting you organize feeds by topic.

It's a nonprofit

You won't get force-fed ads, or bombarded with paywalls. Though, if you're able, you should definitely donate to Mastodon and the admin of your instance. There are some paid options, but most instances are run by volunteers and made available for free to anyone who wants to sign up. The vast majority of instance admins put donations towards infrastructure cost and improvement.

Closing thoughts

There are downsides to Mastodon. The initial onboarding can be overwhelming; figuring out what an instance is and which one to join is already a lot. Then there's the initial loneliness of an empty feed. Where most people are used to a centralized platform with quick onboarding and an algorithm learning their preferences and letting them jump in right off the bat, Mastodon requires initial learning and intentional usage and setup.

There are those in the Mastodon community who can be unwelcoming to users who feel overwhelmed by the onboarding requirements. However, there are even more in the community who are happy to welcome and help new users get started.

I won't pretend that Mastodon is perfect, nor that it's the right platform for everyone. It still has plenty of rough edges and asks a lot from its users. However, if you are tired of big tech's stranglehold on your attention and online connections, and you don't mind putting in some time and effort to see what this Mastodon thing is all about, then I say give it a go.

Don't reject yourself

2026-04-10 01:36:48

  • Lord of the Flies: 21
  • Dune: 23
  • Carrie: 30

Great books.

The numbers aren't how many awards they've won. And it's not how many million copies they've sold.

It's how many times they got rejected before being published. "Too pessimistic, too complex, too strange." And so on.

Turns out quite a few people begged to differ.

You may be a publisher too, of blog posts. Try not to be a rejecting one. There are people who would love to read what you have to say.

Hit publish.

the public

2026-04-10 00:45:00

Don't you hate it when you go out in public, and the public is there?

Jokes aside, my relationship with the public is difficult.

I think most interactions are actually neutral; just passing each other, sitting next to each other, exchanging glances, paying for things.

Some are good, and they are so rare that it restores a lot of faith in me. I love that the barista at the coffee shop is always so heart warming and genuinely happy and kind; I have brought him a little chocolate Santa before to thank him.

The negative experiences unfortunately stick with me longer, and are the first thing I think of. Vomit, dog poop and litter on the sidewalk, loud music in public transport, smoking and spitting everywhere, getting honked at while walking down the street, people under the influence or in a mental health episode harassing others, public spaces filled with either intense perfume/deodorant or piss and sweat smell... just to name a few. I'm very sensitive to smell and sound, and it often feels like my skin is peeling off and my head will explode when I am exposed to these.

My home is my retreat, my silent refuge. I go there to recharge. Basically all of my hobbies can be done independently inside by myself. Aside from work, I don't really go out that often because I don't feel welcome or comfortable outside a lot of times. The above negative experiences, together with urban car-centric design, overfilled cafes or restaurants, and infection risks just don't make it that enticing for me.

The exceptions are going out in the dark when the streets are empty, or on long walks in the forest. I need my solitude and quiet, and the few people I see in the forest usually have the common decency not to act like teenagers in a small park area do.

When I want to do outdoor stuff with my wife or friends, of course I have to step outside. The museums lately were wonderful, for example. I enter the public, but mainly because my focus is spending time with them. When I dress in bright colors, put on one of my colorful wigs, adorn my hair with stuff and put rhinestones on my face, I mainly do that for me and them; any onlooker is welcome to enjoy it too, of course. Maybe it makes someone feel happy or brave to see that.

Still, there is this expectation by many that once you put yourself out there, you consent to what happens to you, and that you perform for others... and that can be disappointing and make you question whether you wanna commit to this at all. Like you should have anticipated rude comments if you dress like that, for example (hasn't happened in quite a while, but still!).

I find my relationship to the internet similarly complicated, if not even more so. After all, the internet is where the very same public is that I otherwise tend to have issues with. I have to go outside for necessities, work and enjoyment; but do I have to expose myself on and to the online? Why do I do it?

Walking outside, I have very rarely wondered what that person on the opposite side of the street thinks about a topic, or their opinion on how I am dressed; yet at home, in my refuge from the public, I open the internet, and invite the public into my safe space via me seeing their stuff. I see their thoughts, despite being at home. I see things and it's like seeing dog poop not picked up on the sidewalk. I put things online about myself, and therefore invite the public to consume it, to comment on it. It feels weird to acknowledge that.

The same thing from above applies here: If you make it public, anything goes. If you didn't want that, you shouldn't have put that online. Makes sense, depending on what it is.

An online presence feels so at odds with being a private person in some ways, or being picky about people, and being intentionally harder to access in real life. It can even feel like a narcissistic shrine to oneself at times, or a hardening cast around you that makes it more difficult to change it and let it grow with you as time goes on. I deal with that right now.

Online, you can't really retreat; either you're there or you're not, obscurity by using smaller platforms doesn't help much. It also feels weird because in a way, you are expected to put on a performance for an online crowd once you are there.

In the offline public, I simply exist in the space to go where I need to go, or to enjoy a meal or the time at the lake. In the online public, I am content to be consumed. We are invited to criticize people like product reviews, or as if they are annoying ads shoved down our throats (and I guess influencers are that). The reactions to people changing up their online presence seem less like they're about a person and more like anger when the formula of a product you like got changed. If someone comes up to you on the street saying you'll never find a man in that getup, they're rightfully seen as a weirdo, but online, it's discourse and engagement is farmed.

Recently, I've been wondering why I put in the effort of putting my stuff online to the very same public I don't particularly care about, or sometimes even dislike, on the street1. In the offline world, I don't really give them anything, but online, I give them so much. My art, my thoughts, my research, my help. Is it worth it, is it hypocritical? Is it believable when I say I do this for me, my wife, my friends, and some drive-by eyeballs? I could just keep it to myself, keep it all in the journal, start a password-protected blog elsewhere.

I don't have any good answers to this; for now, it seems I have to walk around as a contradiction. In real life, I cannot make myself selectively visible to just a few people (I wish I could!); online, I could find a way, but I don't. That's odd.

Maybe there is pride in my work and what I do, an urge to be seen by others who understand me, something to prove I was there too, a way to show people alternative ways of being online, or spreading more awareness about specific rights or health issues. Still, it's curious that I would do this online, but not offline - I would not walk up to a random person and say something, or walk around with a banner, or stand at a town square with a megaphone. But do I have to? Or is online simply the best way for me to find a way to interact with, and be in, the public?

It's easy to see the internet as a self-obsessed thing, filled with navelgazing; people might read personal blogs online and go "Why should we listen to you? Who even are you? Who cares, who asked? Why do you think anyone needs to hear this from you? Isn't this just digital garbage? This isn't even an original thought."

I understand how this view is fostered in a time when anyone can throw their opinions online in seconds; but in a way, this is unprecedented, and previous generations in history would have appreciated the ability to be so easily heard/seen and making their feelings known to so many people without relying on flyers or a newspaper. So maybe this is a privilege we should not take for granted, especially as tensions and censorship across the globe rise.

And as always, you have to let in nasty stuff if you also wanna let in love. Close yourself off, and you receive neither. I have to walk past dog poop and sit in sometimes excruciating trams for 45 minutes to reach the nice barista or have a good in-person talk with a coworker. I have received some truly shitty emails over the years2, but the good ones outweigh them. I wade through the Discover feed to see some beautiful gems.

What makes the online public so difficult is that once it's out there, it's out; even when you change your mind or grow. While we want our online presence to be a continuous process readjusting boundaries, it's more like committing to the most vulnerable piece that is still online, over and over again.

In contrast: Before I step into the offline public space, I can readjust how I want to appear every time. The stranger on the street doesn't see all the history attached, doesn't see all the past versions of me that have stepped outside.

And here I am, once again, stepping out into the public.

Reply via email
Published

  1. Of course I care in the sense that everyone should have a home, money, healthcare, a support network, access to education, fulfilling work etc etc., but that's not what I'm talking about here.

  2. No, socially anxious person reading this and thinking this could be about you, it wasn't you. It could have never been you. The people I am talking about don't care about how they come across and haven't spent a second self-reflecting. You're good.

The Two Moments That Changed Me Forever

2026-04-09 23:30:25

I was having coffee with one of my coworkers yesterday and he and I got to talking about the importance and beauty of life. How valuable our time on this earth is and why we shouldn't waste it. We also got into some other theological and philosophical stuff, but out of the conversation about life, I made the following statement:

The two events in my life that changed how I viewed life the most was the day my dad died, and the day my daughter was born.

The day my dad died showed not only how short life is, but how not even the next hour is a guarantee. How grief is love with nowhere to go. How important it is to make time for people closest to you, and even despite all the time you've spent with them, you'll always wish you'd had more.

The day my daughter was born showed me the importance of living in the exact moment you are right now. When she was born, nothing outside of this little bubble housing me, my wife, and this newborn baby in my arms mattered. Every other worry disappeared. Every insecurity gone. I only thought of what was happening right in front of me. And savored every second I could.

I find it interesting how the two moments also show a sort of circle of life in a sense. Death and Birth.

Anyway, just something I wanted to share.

|

Reply via email: [email protected]


as of writing this...

It's my daughter's birthday. Little girl turns 2 and I'm just blown away at how fast time has flown. I got to do work-from-home today and tomorrow so I could spend more time with them. My wife and I spent last night putting up streamers and balloons in the hallway and then sneaking balloons into her room so when she woke up she'd see them all. I got her a CD player for her birthday and I think she's gonna love it.