MoreRSS

site iconAlec MuffettModify

Alec is a technologist, writer & security consultant who has worked in host and network security for more than 30 years, with 25 of those in industry.
Please copy the RSS to your reader, or quickly subscribe to:

Inoreader Feedly Follow Feedbin Local Reader

Rss preview of Blog of Alec Muffett

Interesting to compare and contrast EU attempts to force chat control, with failed Australian attempt at the same from 2024:

2025-11-19 17:17:20

2024 Australia: In November, the eSafety commissioner announced draft standards that would require the operators of cloud and messaging services to detect and remove known child abuse and pro-terror material “where technically feasible”, as well as disrupt and deter new material of the same nature.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/jun/21/australia-esafety-commissioner-child-abuse-detection-online-safety

Key Concerns Raised by Experts:

1. Flawed ‘voluntary’ AI Chat Control Creates Dangerous False Positives

The experts warn that unlike the previous Council’s proposal, the new text expands scanning of private communications to include automated text analysis, using AI to identify ambiguous “grooming” behaviours. They argue this will create a dragnet that ensnares innocent people. “Current AI technology is far from being precise enough to undertake these tasks with guarantees for the necessary level of accuracy.”

https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/eu-chat-control-proposal-still-poses-high-risks-despite-removal-of-mandatory-scanning-experts-warn/

Australia: eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant called to testify before US Congress by Donald Trump ally over ‘threat’ to Americans’ free speech | Sky News

2025-11-19 15:46:50

Chickens coming home to roost:

Sky News has obtained a bombshell letter from a US House of Representatives committee chairman and ally of President Donald Trump accusing eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant of being a “zealot” and “direct threat” to the free speech of American citizens and requesting she testifies before Congress within two weeks.


https://www.skynews.com.au/world-news/united-states/esafety-commissioner-julie-inman-grant-called-to-testify-before-us-congress-by-donald-trump-ally-over-threat-to-americans-free-speech/news-story/c232d406b9a58089bf94240cb3b425d3

Via:

The difference between British regulation vs: American regulation: Rat Shit in Food vs: CSAM

2025-11-17 19:39:43

US regulation is binary: FDA permits 9ppm of rat droppings in flour, realising it’s inevitable. You are within limits, yes or no? UK regulation is analogue: banning any & all poop in expectation that this will drive ever-cleaner processes of food handling, so any (rare) cases can be dealt with by individual investigation.

Guess which…


Guess which doesn’t work for the internet, doesn’t scale, doesn’t travel, is gamed by those who face it, & inflames activists? Not to mention: in the world of food the rats are not actively attempting to circumvent restrictions on where they can poop.

Also:

Father of teen whose death was linked to social media has ‘lost faith’ in Ofcom
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/nov/15/molly-russell-family-social-media-ofcom

Update: Citations

  • US FDA, Food Defect Levels Handbook: “Wheat: Rodent filth (MPM-V15) Average of 9 mg or more rodent excreta pellets and/or pellet fragments per kilogram”
  • UK: The Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995: Ch 1: “The layout, design, construction and size of food premises shall … permit good food hygiene practices, including protection against cross contamination between and during operations, by foodstuffs, equipment, materials, water, air supply or personnel and external sources of contamination such as pests”
  • (ibid) Ch 3: “…permit good food hygiene practices, including protection against cross contamination between and during operations, by foodstuffs, equipment, materials, water, air supply or personnel and external sources of contamination such as pests … foodstuffs must be so placed as to avoid, so far as is reasonably practicable, the risk of contamination.”
  • (ibid) Ch 4: “2.—(1) Receptacles in vehicles and/or containers must not be used for transporting anything other than foodstuffs where this may result in contamination of foodstuffs (2) Bulk foodstuffs in liquid, granular or powder form must be transported in receptacles and/or containers/tankers reserved for the transport of foodstuffs if otherwise there is a risk of contamination. Such containers must be marked in a clearly visible and indelible fashion, in one or more Community languages, to sow that they are used for the transport of foodstuffs, or must be marked “for foodstuffs only”. (3) Where conveyances and/or containers are used for transporting anything in addition to foodstuffs or for transporting different foodstuffs at the same time, there must be effective separation of products where necessary, to protect against the risk of contamination.”
  • etc.

BREAKING: EU attempting last minute resurrection ChatControl client-side scanning & message surveillance under vague “mandate… all reasonable mitigation measures” figleaf; FightChatControl.EU to be reactivated…

2025-11-10 22:34:26

Quote Patrick Breyer:

A perfidious trick? The EU Council Presidency wants to introduce mandatory through the backdoor: An Art. 4 amendment would MANDATE “all reasonable mitigation measures,” including scanning, enforced with sanctions!

https://cdn.netzpolitik.org/wp-upload/2025/11/2025-10-30_Council_Presidency_CSAR_Policy-debate_14032.pdf

“Trump [poised to] to deport boss of Starmer-linked charity” | Imran Ahmed of CCDH, being booted from USA?

2025-11-10 22:01:54

A quick run through the archives reminds us that Mr Ahmed’s CCDH recently called for Ofcom to be able to appeal for powers of direct censorship in times of crisis, whilst elsewhere downplaying the consequences of the Online Safety Act lest it get a bad reputation.

And now the Americans are considering kicking him out? This might be the start of genuine consequences for the “Duty of Care” OSA.


Quoth the Telegraph: (archived)

In 2021, the group named Mr Kennedy, the current Health Secretary, as one of its “Disinformation Dozen”, a list of 12 people it claimed should have their accounts removed from social media for posting anti?vaccine content.

Leaked documents, thought to have been drawn up by the CCDH, also reportedly listed “kill Musk’s Twitter” as one of the group’s annual priorities last year.

The non-profit published a series of highly critical reports linking Mr Musk’s takeover of the platform, now known as X, to rising misinformation and hate speech that was “spreading like wildfire”.

and:

The move is part of an American campaign to “step up pressure” on Britain’s Online Safety Act. The law, which regulates online speech, allows the UK Government to levy massive fines on US companies such as Apple, Truth Social, and X if it finds that rules on hate speech have been broken.

Those in the president’s inner circle see the potential penalties as an unwarranted foreign intervention into American free speech.

Since the law came into effect this year, Ofcom, the UK’s online regulator, has written to several US firms ordering them to conform to the act.

It has sparked outrage from Congressmen and legal experts in the US, who say the overreach is a threat by the UK to silence America’s companies and citizens if they refuse to comply with the British Government’s view of what is acceptable to post online.

“The one thing everyone [in the Trump administration] agrees on is the need to dramatically pressure the UK over the Online Safety Act,” the source said.

“New Danish proposal for Chat Control: three fat problems remain”

2025-11-10 21:35:52

If kids can’t use WhatsApp, will parents have to use SMS?

Will the EU not ban SMS?

Denmark’s update to the EU “chat control” plan shifts to “voluntary” scanning, but ex-MEP Patrick Breyer warns it still sidesteps Parliament’s court-order safeguard, would ban under-16s from messaging apps, and could effectively end anonymous communication.

https://eutechloop.com/new-danish-proposal-for-chat-control