2026-04-01 02:48:00
Reliable electricity is gaining value as utilities plan for AI-led growth and a more digital economy.
Capacity factor helps compare the fitness of power sources on this topic because it shows which technologies deliver the steadiest output over time.
This graphic, in partnership with the National Public Utilities Council, shows the most consistent U.S. power sources using data from the EIA.
Capacity factor compares actual generation with the maximum possible output over a full year. As a result, it offers a simple way to see which power sources can run hardest when demand rises.
Here is a table that shows U.S. power sources ranked by 2025 capacity factor.
| Energy Source | Capacity Factor (2025) |
|---|---|
| Nuclear | 91% |
| Geothermal | 66% |
| Biomass | 59% |
| Natural Gas (Combined Cycle) | 58% |
| Wood | 57% |
| Coal | 49% |
| Hydroelectric | 35% |
| Wind | 34% |
| Solar (Photovoltaic) | 24% |
| Petroleum (Steam Turbine) | 11% |
Among the major energy sources powering the U.S. today, one standout winner is nuclear.
Nuclear posts a 91% capacity factor, far ahead of geothermal at 66% and biomass at 59%. That lead helps explain why firm, emission-free generation remains central as U.S. data center power demand climbs.
The combined cycle variant of natural gas, with its capacity factor of 58%, is the current go-to source in the U.S. for meeting the jump in electricity demand from AI and data centers because utilities can add firm gas-fired generation faster than many other always-available options.
Meanwhile, a low capacity factor is one of the biggest downsides of wind (34%) and solar (24%), as it limits how often they can produce at high levels compared with more consistent sources. Utilities must often pair them with storage, backup generation, or grid upgrades to maintain reliability as demand grows.
Several U.S. investor-owned utilities are prioritizing expanding energy capacity for the source with the highest capacity factor.
For example, Duke Energy filed an early site permit application on December 30, 2025, for a potential nuclear site at Belews Creek in North Carolina.
Meanwhile, Georgia Power’s approved 2025 IRP is designed to meet the needs of a growing Georgia, showing how major investor-owned utilities are planning for higher loads with firm generation, grid upgrades, and long-range strategy.
Together, those moves show why capacity factor matters beyond a ranking. It helps utilities identify which power sources can support growth, strengthen resilience, and keep decarbonization plans moving.

Which U.S. states are winning the data center race? This visualization shows the states gaining and losing data center market share in the next two years.

Which states dominate carbon offsets? This U.S. map shows the hotspots as utilities respond to the AI electricity surge.

Just four U.S. utilities operate with over 80% carbon-free generation. This graphic ranks the top 10 cleanest utilities by their fuel mix.

This streamgraph shows projected offshore wind capacity by region, according to The Global Wind Energy Council.

Severe weather caused all ten of the largest U.S. power outages in the past decade, highlighting the importance of grid resiliency.

This treemap chart uses data from Statistical Review of World Energy to show the top 10 countries with the most battery storage capacity in 2023.

This voronoi depicts the countries that capture the most carbon globally in 2023, with data from Rystad Energy.

This bar chart shows the countries’ highest and lowest energy transition index scores determined by the World Economic Forum.

This dumbbell plot shows the most and least expensive sources of energy in the U.S., using data from Lazard.

This infographic shows the greenhouse gas emissions targets of all countries and their target years with data from Net Zero Tracker.

This bar chart shows the varying prices of carbon across different economies around the globe, using data from the World Bank.

This streamgraph shows the growth in renewable energy capacity by country and region since 2000.

From tropical cyclones to severe storms, the number of extreme weather disasters with losses exceeding $1 billion has climbed over time.

What are the most polluted cities in the U.S. according to data from the American Lung Association’s 2024 State of the Air Report?

The U.S. emits about 6 billion metric tons of greenhouse gases a year. Here’s how these emissions rank by sector.

Can America become carbon-free by 2035? This graphic breaks down the United States’ electricity mix, by state.

This infographic highlights announced coal plant closures in the U.S. and how much power will be affected.
2026-04-01 01:24:09
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
America’s data center buildout is increasingly concentrated in a handful of states as AI demand drives a new wave of digital infrastructure investment. Texas and Virginia alone account for far more projects under construction than most of the country combined.
This map shows the number of data centers currently under construction in each U.S. state as of March 2026, based on data from Aterio.
Texas leads data construction by a narrow margin, but the bigger story is how sharply development clusters around states with access to land, power, connectivity, and favorable permitting.
| Rank | State | Data Centers Under Construction |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Texas | 140 |
| 2 | Virginia | 136 |
| 3 | Georgia | 56 |
| 4 | Ohio | 51 |
| 5 | Arizona | 35 |
| 6 | Nevada | 29 |
| 7 | Indiana | 23 |
| 8 | Mississippi | 21 |
| 9 | Illinois | 19 |
| 10 | Iowa | 15 |
| 11 | Oregon | 14 |
| 12 | North Carolina | 12 |
| 12 | South Carolina | 12 |
| 12 | Wisconsin | 12 |
| 12 | Maryland | 12 |
| 16 | Pennsylvania | 11 |
| 16 | Louisiana | 11 |
| 18 | Utah | 10 |
| 19 | Oklahoma | 9 |
| 20 | Missouri | 8 |
| 20 | Alabama | 8 |
| 20 | Wyoming | 8 |
| 23 | California | 6 |
| 23 | Colorado | 6 |
| 25 | Nebraska | 5 |
| 25 | New Mexico | 5 |
| 27 | Minnesota | 4 |
| 27 | North Dakota | 4 |
| 29 | Washington | 3 |
| 29 | New York | 3 |
| 29 | Tennessee | 3 |
| 32 | Florida | 2 |
| 32 | New Jersey | 2 |
| 32 | Kentucky | 2 |
| 32 | Arkansas | 2 |
| 32 | Idaho | 2 |
| 37 | Michigan | 1 |
| 37 | Kansas | 1 |
| 39 | Massachusetts | 0 |
| 39 | Connecticut | 0 |
| 39 | Delaware | 0 |
| 39 | New Hampshire | 0 |
| 39 | District Of Columbia | 0 |
| 39 | West Virginia | 0 |
| 39 | Montana | 0 |
| 39 | Maine | 0 |
| 39 | Rhode Island | 0 |
| 39 | South Dakota | 0 |
| 39 | Hawaii | 0 |
| 39 | Vermont | 0 |
U.S. data center capacity is set to expand rapidly as artificial intelligence drives a new wave of infrastructure demand. Meeting that demand will require enormous investment in power, land, and construction, and the buildout is already well underway. Big Tech is expected to spend $700 billion on AI data centers this year alone, helping accelerate projects across a small number of key states.
Texas leads the nation with 140 data centers under construction, narrowly ahead of Virginia with 136. They are the only two states with more than 100 projects underway as of March 2026, putting them well ahead of the rest of the country.
After those two, there is a sharp drop to Georgia at 56 and Ohio at 51. That gap highlights just how concentrated the current buildout is, with most states seeing only modest activity. In fact, 12 states have no data centers under construction at all, while another 11 have fewer than five.
Virginia’s strength is centered in Northern Virginia’s “Data Center Alley,” one of the world’s most important internet hubs. The region’s dense fiber connectivity, established cloud presence, and proximity to major population and enterprise centers have helped attract operators including Amazon Web Services, Google, and Microsoft.
A huge portion of global internet traffic passes through the region, which is only set to grow as more data centers are established.
The same factors attracting data center developers, especially access to power and land, are also creating new bottlenecks.
In fast-growing markets, the surge in electricity demand is beginning to test grid capacity and raise questions about how quickly utilities can keep pace. In Texas, developers have created levels of demand that could be impossible to meet.
The boom has also sparked resistance in some communities near proposed sites. In rural Georgia, for instance, residents cite widespread concerns about sound, light, and environmental pollution. In addition, one resident says a data center has caused her private well to run dry; data centers are water-intensive operations because they use water for cooling.
As a result, policymakers in some states and municipalities are considering tighter rules on future development, ranging from stricter environmental reviews to temporary pauses on new projects.
To learn more about the data center buildout, check out this graphic showing which states are winning and losing the most market share.
2026-03-31 23:36:00
As the global economy adjusts elevated levels of geopolitical uncertainty, growth is becoming increasingly uneven. This divergence is reshaping where economic power and opportunity will emerge in the years ahead.
This graphic, created in partnership with the Hinrich Foundation, provides visual context to the economies driving global growth in 2025 and 2026.
Data comes from the IMF’s World Economic Outlook. It’s part of a deep dive report, India’s Reckoning: How geopolitics and trade are testing India’s development strategy and the global balance of power.
The global economy is entering a phase of uneven expansion. Emerging markets are firmly in the driver’s seat, according to IMF projections.
India stands out as the fastest growing major economy, projected to expand at more than triple the pace of most developed nations (6.2% in 2026).
| Country | Real GDP Growth 2025 (%) | Real GDP Growth 2026 (%) |
|---|---|---|
India |
6.6 | 6.2 |
Indonesia |
4.9 | 4.9 |
China |
4.8 | 4.2 |
Brazil |
2.4 | 1.9 |
U.S. |
2.0 | 2.1 |
UK |
1.3 | 1.3 |
Japan |
1.1 | 0.6 |
France |
0.7 | 0.9 |
Russia |
0.6 | 1.0 |
Germany |
0.2 | 0.9 |
Close behind, Indonesia and China are expected to maintain strong momentum, with expansion rates above 4% for 2025 and 2026.
In contrast, advanced economies are facing slower, more constrained growth. The U.S. is forecast to grow modestly at around 2%, while countries like Japan, France, and Germany are expected to hover below 1% for 2026.
This divergence reflects structural differences, from demographics and productivity to investment cycles, and signals a broader shift in where future economic expansion will occur.
For investors and policymakers, this growing gap underscores the importance of looking beyond traditional markets for opportunities.
India’s rise is reshaping the global economic landscape. But as growth accelerates, the country faces a reckoning: translating economic scale into shared prosperity while navigating intensifying geopolitical competition.

The Ecological Footprint reveals how consumption strains the planet. Which countries leave the biggest mark?

Levels of economic development differ not only from one country to another, but also dramatically within their own borders. Which countries lead versus lag?

Based on data from the World Trade Organization, which countries have the highest and lowest number of trade agreements?

Based on the Hinrich Foundation’s 2025 Sustainable Trade Index, which economies are the most and least sustainable?

Trump’s tariffs affect all major U.S. trading partners, but what matters is how each country’s tariffs compare to its competitors.

U.S. tariffs have climbed to an average rate of 18.6%—the highest since 1933. But what does this mean for everyday consumers?

The UN has crunched the numbers projecting the ripple effects of Trump’s May 12th tariffs. Which economies are bracing for the biggest hits?

America’s goods trade deficits have dominated headlines, but a critical part of the equation is being ignored: services trade.

More data will be created, captured, and replicated in the next three years than in the rest of human history. But by how much?

Visual Capitalist has partnered with the Hinrich Foundation to explore the landscape of global trade and find out what students and trade professionals can do to…

CO₂ emissions are reshaping the flows of international trade. Which countries have the highest and lowest CO₂ emissions per capita?

Which countries have the highest and lowest life expectancies at birth?

Based on data from the IMF’s World Economic Outlook, which countries have the highest and lowest government debt ratios?

Based on the Hinrich Foundation’s 2024 Sustainable Trade Index, which economies are the most and least sustainable?

Which countries and regions decreased, banned, or increased Russian oil imports following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine?

The de-dollarization of China’s trade settlements has begun. What patterns do we see in USD and RMB use within China and globally?

Rising geopolitical tensions are shaping the future of international trade, but what is the effect on trading among G7 and BRICS countries?

High resource dependency in trade makes countries more susceptible to market fluctuations and climate change.

This graphic adds visual context to the global education gap, using data from 29 major economies.

This graphic visualizes 30 country’s credit ratings, using data from the 2023 Sustainable Trade Index.

The Sustainable Trade Index 2023 is an annual ranking of the world’s most sustainable economies. View this infographic to see the results.

The Hinrich Foundation visualizes the impact of corporate subsidies by G20 nations between 2008 and Q1 2023.

The Hinrich Foundation explores China’s use of economic coercion and the implications of its control over the solar energy sector.

We analyze recent trade policies implemented by G20 members to determine whether they are liberalizing or harmful.

We highlight key findings from the Hinrich Foundation’s latest report on carbon markets, produced in partnership with Visual Capitalist.

Which economies have hazy air, and which ones enjoy mostly clear skies? Find out in this geographic breakdown of air pollution levels.

Prior to invading Ukraine, Russia had one of the highest levels of geopolitical risk. How does geopolitical uncertainty vary around the world?

The U.S. has by far the most harmful tariffs, with nearly 5,000 in force. Which economy has the least tariffs?

Global trade is growing across regions and countries which is creating an explosion in new jobs and education opportunities.

See which economies have the most sustainable trade policies in the Hinrich Foundation’s 2022 Sustainable Trade Index.

In this infographic, we examine the current state of digital fragmentation and it’s implications on the world.

Asia’s digital economy is expanding quicker than ever, but cooperation between governments is needed to reduce barriers.

Free trade is a powerful engine for economic growth, but rising protectionism stands in the way. See what the data says in this infographic.
2026-03-31 22:19:09
See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app.
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
As China has grown to become the world’s second-largest economy, its role in global markets has also shifted. Whereas once China was primarily seen as a destination for international investment, in recent decades it has become an increasingly large investment source itself.
This graphic maps out China’s overseas investment since 2005, highlighting the distribution of Chinese foreign direct investment in different countries using data from the China Global Investment Tracker (CGIT) co-produced by the American Enterprise Institute and the Heritage Foundation.
Between 2005 and 2025, Chinese companies invested over $1.5 trillion abroad, with over half of this investment ($806.8 billion) heading to just 10 countries. Only transactions valued at $100 million or more were included.
No country has received more Chinese investment since the country’s opening than the United States, into which $204.14 billion has been invested by Chinese companies between 2005 and 2025. The largest single reported investment in the U.S. was Shuanghui’s $7.1 billion acquisition of Smithfield Foods, the world’s largest pork producer, in 2013.
The data table below provides an overview of the dozens of Chinese investment destinations worldwide:
| Rank | Country | Chinese Investment in $B (2005-2025) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
United States |
204.14 |
| 2 |
Australia |
108.12 |
| 3 |
United Kingdom |
106.58 |
| 4 |
Brazil |
78.88 |
| 5 |
Switzerland |
62.87 |
| 6 |
Canada |
57.28 |
| 7 |
Germany |
56.34 |
| 8 |
Indonesia |
49.37 |
| 9 |
Singapore |
46.11 |
| 10 |
France |
37.07 |
| 11 |
Russia |
34.25 |
| 12 |
Peru |
29.10 |
| 13 |
Malaysia |
27.93 |
| 14 |
Italy |
25.75 |
| 15 |
Kazakhstan |
25.22 |
| 16 |
Netherlands |
21.95 |
| 17 |
Congo, Democratic Republic of the |
19.93 |
| 18 |
Finland |
18.48 |
| 19 |
Chile |
17.55 |
| 20 |
India |
17.28 |
| 21 |
Sweden |
17.25 |
| 22 |
Laos |
16.82 |
| 23 |
Pakistan |
16.56 |
| 24 |
Saudi Arabia |
15.70 |
| 25 |
Iraq |
15.56 |
| 26 |
Cambodia |
14.59 |
| 27 |
Korea, South |
14.31 |
| 28 |
Vietnam |
14.21 |
| 29 |
Guyana |
14.04 |
| 30 |
Hungary |
13.80 |
| 31 |
Spain |
13.54 |
| 32 |
Argentina |
13.21 |
| 33 |
Japan |
12.78 |
| 34 |
Israel |
12.73 |
| 35 |
Guinea |
12.11 |
| 36 |
Portugal |
11.80 |
| 37 |
Thailand |
11.73 |
| 38 |
South Africa |
11.73 |
| 39 |
Greece |
9.66 |
| 40 |
Egypt |
8.75 |
| 41 |
Colombia |
8.35 |
| 42 |
Nigeria |
8.28 |
| 43 |
United Arab Emirates |
8.16 |
| 44 |
Ireland |
8.12 |
| 45 |
Norway |
7.97 |
| 46 |
Dominica |
7.96 |
| 47 |
Ecuador |
7.96 |
| 48 |
Bangladesh |
7.74 |
| 49 |
Myanmar |
7.09 |
| 50 |
Türkiye |
6.83 |
| 51 |
Zambia |
6.78 |
| 52 |
Mexico |
6.50 |
| 53 |
Belgium |
5.83 |
| 54 |
Serbia |
5.76 |
| 55 |
Niger |
5.57 |
| 56 |
Angola |
5.50 |
| 57 |
Mozambique |
4.92 |
| 58 |
Iran |
4.72 |
| 59 |
Mongolia |
4.66 |
| 60 |
Ghana |
4.65 |
| 61 |
Zimbabwe |
4.59 |
| 62 |
Venezuela |
4.57 |
| 63 |
Philippines |
4.38 |
| 64 |
Uzbekistan |
4.38 |
| 65 |
Sri Lanka |
4.30 |
| 66 |
Namibia |
4.21 |
| 67 |
Sierra Leone |
3.85 |
| 68 |
Morocco |
3.82 |
| 69 |
New Zealand |
3.80 |
| 70 |
Syria |
3.76 |
| 71 |
Oman |
3.73 |
| 72 |
Brunei |
3.59 |
| 73 |
Uganda |
3.32 |
| 74 |
Afghanistan |
3.07 |
| 75 |
Botswana |
2.85 |
| 76 |
Luxembourg |
2.79 |
| 77 |
Ethiopia |
2.77 |
| 78 |
Congo, Republic of the |
2.61 |
| 79 |
Poland |
2.61 |
| 80 |
Cameroon |
2.58 |
| 81 |
Tanzania |
2.58 |
| 82 |
Kenya |
2.32 |
| 83 |
Papua New Guinea |
2.30 |
| 84 |
Korea, North |
2.00 |
| 85 |
Jordan |
1.96 |
| 86 |
Slovakia |
1.86 |
| 87 |
Turkmenistan |
1.79 |
| 88 |
Chad |
1.63 |
| 89 |
Kyrgyzstan |
1.62 |
| 90 |
Slovenia |
1.39 |
| 91 |
Taiwan |
1.22 |
| 92 |
Cyprus |
1.20 |
| 93 |
Jamaica |
1.17 |
| 94 |
Trinidad and Tobago |
1.17 |
| 95 |
Nepal |
1.12 |
| 96 |
Austria |
1.11 |
| 97 |
Eritrea |
1.07 |
| 98 |
Qatar |
1.05 |
| 99 |
Tajikistan |
1.00 |
| 100 |
Algeria |
0.96 |
| 101 |
Czechia |
0.86 |
| 102 |
Denmark |
0.84 |
| 103 |
Côte d'Ivoire |
0.79 |
| 104 |
Antigua and Barbuda |
0.74 |
| 105 |
Mauritius |
0.74 |
| 106 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
0.73 |
| 107 |
Djibouti |
0.70 |
| 108 |
Kuwait |
0.65 |
| 109 |
Mali |
0.60 |
| 110 |
Liberia |
0.52 |
| 111 |
Cuba |
0.50 |
| 112 |
Yemen |
0.47 |
| 113 |
Bulgaria |
0.44 |
| 114 |
Malta |
0.44 |
| 115 |
Bolivia |
0.40 |
| 116 |
Belarus |
0.40 |
| 117 |
Gabon |
0.40 |
| 118 |
Georgia |
0.37 |
| 119 |
Suriname |
0.36 |
| 120 |
Bahamas |
0.35 |
| 121 |
Panama |
0.31 |
| 122 |
Nicaragua |
0.30 |
| 123 |
Azerbaijan |
0.27 |
| 124 |
Sao Tome and Principe |
0.27 |
| 125 |
Sudan |
0.26 |
| 126 |
Croatia |
0.22 |
| 127 |
Malawi |
0.20 |
| 128 |
Solomon Islands |
0.20 |
| 129 |
Togo |
0.19 |
| 130 |
Ukraine |
0.18 |
| 131 |
Guinea-Bissau |
0.17 |
| 132 |
Madagascar |
0.15 |
| 133 |
Tunisia |
0.13 |
| 134 |
Rwanda |
0.12 |
| 135 |
Maldives |
0.11 |
| 136 |
Samoa |
0.11 |
| 137 |
Montenegro |
0.10 |
| 138 |
Honduras |
0.00 |
Major foreign investments and acquisitions are subject to approval by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which in recent years has grown increasingly skeptical of Chinese investment as U.S.-China relations have worsened.
However, 2025 still saw over $3.79 billion in new investments, indicating that even growing bilateral competition does not mean full economic decoupling between the world’s two largest economies.
Following the U.S., a majority of the top 10 Chinese investment destinations since 2005 are large, developed Western economies like Australia ($108.1 billion), Switzerland ($62.9 billion), Canada ($57.3 billion), Germany ($56.3 billion), France ($37.1 billion), and the United Kingdom ($106.6 billion).
There are two major emerging-market exceptions to this, Brazil ($78.9 billion) and Indonesia ($49.4 billion), both of which are BRICS+ partners of China. Brazil was the top investment destination worldwide in 2025, receiving over $7.31 billion in capital from major Chinese firms such as State Grid and China Communications Construction.
Singapore, a city-state of just over 6 million people, has seen over $46 billion in investment since 2005, a figure roughly equivalent to that seen in Indonesia, the world’s fourth most-populous country, reflecting the value of a mature and diversified economy in attracting Chinese investment.
One notable exception from the top 10: India, the world’s fourth-largest economy and a BRICS+ giant, which received only $17.3 billion in Chinese investment over this period, a consequence perhaps of Sino-Indian diplomatic and economic tensions.
Unlike other major investor peers like Germany, Japan, or the U.S., China’s outward investment activity is dominated by state-owned enterprises in key sectors such as energy, infrastructure, and logistics.
For example, State Grid, a utility giant and the world’s third-largest company by overall revenue behind only Walmart and Amazon, has invested over $33 billion abroad since 2005, with particularly massive investments in Australia, Brazil, Chile, Italy, Russia, and the Philippines.
Other state-owned energy conglomerates such as China National Petroleum Corporation and China Three Gorges have also invested tens of billions of dollars overseas in recent decades, seeking both to secure resources for China’s growing demand while also addressing infrastructure gaps in emerging markets.
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Visualizing China’s $18.6 Trillion Economy on Voronoi.
2026-03-31 20:02:29
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
America’s $2.1 trillion export economy is not only massive, it is highly concentrated geographically.
A small group of states dominates America’s trade footprint, powered by energy, advanced manufacturing, and technology. From Texas’s oil and gas shipments to California’s tech-driven supply chains, regional industries play an outsized role in shaping the country’s global trade position.
This map breaks down each state’s share of total U.S. exports in 2025, based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau.
In 2025, just six states drove more exports than the rest of the country combined.
Texas stands firmly at the top, with $450.3 billion in exports. Its dominance has been fueled by a surge in oil and gas shipments, which more than doubled between 2020 and 2025 amid strong European demand and expanding LNG infrastructure.
California ranks second, contributing 9.1% of total exports ($188.4 billion). Its export mix is led by high-value technology goods, with computer equipment alone reaching $25.5 billion in 2025.
| Rank | State | Share of Total 2025 | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Texas | 21.8% | $450.3B |
| 2 | California | 9.1% | $188.4B |
| 3 | New York | 7.4% | $153.1B |
| 4 | Louisiana | 4.5% | $93.4B |
| 5 | Illinois | 3.9% | $80.0B |
| 6 | Florida | 3.8% | $78.9B |
| 7 | Indiana | 3.3% | $68.8B |
| 8 | Washington | 3.2% | $65.3B |
| 9 | Georgia | 2.9% | $60.3B |
| 10 | Michigan | 2.8% | $58.3B |
| 11 | Ohio | 2.7% | $55.9B |
| 12 | Pennsylvania | 2.5% | $52.2B |
| 13 | Kentucky | 2.5% | $50.6B |
| 14 | Arizona | 2.2% | $44.4B |
| 15 | New Jersey | 2.1% | $44.2B |
| 16 | North Carolina | 2.1% | $43.8B |
| 17 | Massachusetts | 1.9% | $38.8B |
| 18 | South Carolina | 1.9% | $38.5B |
| 19 | Tennessee | 1.8% | $37.7B |
| 20 | Oregon | 1.4% | $28.0B |
| 21 | Wisconsin | 1.3% | $27.1B |
| 22 | Alabama | 1.1% | $23.7B |
| 23 | Minnesota | 1.1% | $23.5B |
| 24 | Utah | 1.1% | $22.4B |
| 25 | Virginia | 0.9% | $19.0B |
| 26 | Missouri | 0.9% | $18.7B |
| 27 | Connecticut | 0.9% | $17.7B |
| 28 | Maryland | 0.8% | $16.5B |
| 29 | Iowa | 0.8% | $16.2B |
| 30 | New Mexico | 0.7% | $15.3B |
| 31 | Kansas | 0.7% | $14.6B |
| 32 | Mississippi | 0.7% | $14.2B |
| 33 | Nevada | 0.6% | $12.7B |
| 34 | Colorado | 0.5% | $11.0B |
| 35 | North Dakota | 0.4% | $8.6B |
| 36 | Nebraska | 0.4% | $7.8B |
| 37 | Oklahoma | 0.4% | $7.5B |
| 38 | New Hampshire | 0.3% | $7.2B |
| 39 | Alaska | 0.3% | $6.7B |
| 40 | Arkansas | 0.3% | $6.6B |
| 41 | Delaware | 0.3% | $5.5B |
| 42 | West Virginia | 0.2% | $4.6B |
| 43 | Idaho | 0.2% | $4.6B |
| 44 | Rhode Island | 0.2% | $4.2B |
| 45 | Dist of Columbia | 0.2% | $3.7B |
| 46 | Maine | 0.2% | $3.2B |
| 47 | Montana | 0.1% | $2.1B |
| 48 | Vermont | 0.1% | $2.1B |
| 49 | Wyoming | 0.1% | $2.0B |
| 50 | South Dakota | 0.1% | $1.9B |
| 51 | Hawaii | 0.02% | $0.4B |
With $153.1 billion in exports, New York follows in third place with a 7.4% share, seeing the fastest-rising annual export growth nationally.
In 2025, exports increased 63%, driven by precious metals refining. As a global hub for refining gold, silver, and copper, exports soared amid strong foreign demand.
Louisiana, ranked fourth, exported $93.4 billion worth of goods. As the largest LNG exporter in the U.S., it accounted for roughly 60% of the country’s LNG shipments in 2025.
Meanwhile, aerospace exports continue to anchor several states’ trade performance. Florida (3.8%), Washington (3.2%), and Georgia (2.9%) all rank among the leading exporters, each posting at least 9% annual growth.
Beyond the top exporters, several states are seeing rapid growth driven by key industries.
Arizona (+37%) and New Mexico (+27%) benefited from booming semiconductor demand, tied to global supply chain shifts and rising investment in AI infrastructure. Notably, New Mexico’s semiconductor exports have grown more than fourfold since 2022, reaching $7 billion.
Precious metals also played a major role in export growth. Alongside New York, states like Utah (+23%) and Nevada (+22%) saw strong gains due to refining activity.
Overall, as global demand shifts and new industries emerge, these geographic patterns will continue to evolve, reshaping where—and how—the U.S. competes on the world stage.
To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on China’s top trading partners in 2025.
2026-03-31 05:32:00
Click to view this graphic in higher-resolution. 
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
The U.S. is home to 43% of the world’s data centers, by far the largest share globally.
As artificial intelligence scales, countries are racing to build the infrastructure needed to support it both now and in the future.
Because AI applications require low latency, data centers are increasingly being built closer to end users—fueling a global expansion in capacity.
This treemap graph visualizes which countries have the most data centers, using data from Data Center Map as of March 2026.
Most of the world’s data centers are in the U.S., at 4,088, which is more than eight times higher than the next country. AI penetration is greater in developed countries, so it also makes sense that data center locations skew this way.
| Rank | Country | Number of Data Centers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
United States |
4,088 |
| 2 |
Germany |
507 |
| 3 |
United Kingdom |
506 |
| 4 |
China |
369 |
| 5 |
France |
346 |
| 6 |
Canada |
286 |
| 7 |
India |
278 |
| 8 |
Australia |
270 |
| 9 |
Japan |
255 |
| 10 |
Italy |
216 |
| 11 |
Brazil |
204 |
| 12 |
Spain |
195 |
| 13 |
Netherlands |
187 |
| 14 |
Indonesia |
185 |
| 15 |
Russia |
181 |
| 16 |
Ireland |
127 |
| 17 |
Switzerland |
114 |
| 18 |
Sweden |
110 |
| 19 |
Finland |
105 |
| 20 |
Poland |
99 |
| 21 |
Norway |
92 |
| 22 |
Denmark |
82 |
| 23 |
Türkiye |
76 |
| 24 |
Mexico |
64 |
| 25 |
Romania |
63 |
| 26 |
Austria |
53 |
| 27 |
Belgium |
48 |
| 28 |
Portugal |
45 |
| 29 |
Ukraine |
37 |
| 30 |
Bulgaria |
31 |
| 31 |
Czechia |
26 |
| 31 |
Greece |
26 |
| 33 |
Latvia |
24 |
| 34 |
Lithuania |
20 |
| 34 |
Slovenia |
20 |
| 36 |
Cyprus |
18 |
| 37 |
Hungary |
17 |
| 38 |
Luxembourg |
16 |
| 38 |
Croatia |
16 |
| 40 |
Slovakia |
13 |
| 40 |
Serbia |
13 |
| 42 |
Estonia |
12 |
| 42 |
Iceland |
12 |
| 42 |
Malta |
12 |
| 45 |
North Macedonia |
7 |
| 46 |
Moldova |
6 |
| 47 |
Georgia |
4 |
| 47 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
4 |
| 49 |
Monaco |
3 |
| 49 |
Azerbaijan |
3 |
| 51 |
Belarus |
2 |
Germany, which has the largest population in the European Union, is the second most data center-dense country at 507. The UK is close behind at 506.
Many data centers are clustered around the traditional FLAP-D corridor of Frankfurt, London, Amsterdam, Paris, and Dublin, which are close to metropolitan hubs and financial markets that need fast cloud and, increasingly, AI connections.
It makes sense, then, that France trails closely at 346, though China sits between it and the UK at 369 data centers.
Canada, India, and Australia—large countries with ample land to develop—are next in line, home to 270 data centers or more.
At the bottom of the dataset is Belarus, with two data centers, along with Monaco and Azerbaijan, which both have three.
As the world aggressively builds out its data center capacity, key questions remain around where infrastructure will go, given the finite nature of land and resources.
Some developers are investing in co-benefits for local communities to aid buy-in. In Ireland, for instance, which had a moratorium on data centers until late last year, an AWS data center feeds its excess heat into a district heating network for social housing and public buildings.
Others are exploring more radical ideas, like putting data centers into orbit.
To learn more about AI, check out this graphic, which shows which countries use Claude.ai the most.