MoreRSS

site iconVisual CapitalistModify

By highlighting the bigger picture through data-driven visuals, we stay true to our mission to help cut through the clutter and simplify a complex world.
Please copy the RSS to your reader, or quickly subscribe to:

Inoreader Feedly Follow Feedbin Local Reader

Rss preview of Blog of Visual Capitalist

Mapped: Internet Freedom Around the World in 2026

2026-04-21 00:35:15

Mapped: Internet Freedom Around the World in 2026

See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Key Takeaways

  • 11 countries tie for the world’s freest internet (score: 92), spanning Europe, Latin America, and Asia.
  • North Korea ranks last (0), with China, Russia, Iran, and Pakistan close behind (4).
  • The U.S. (64) and UK (52) rank mid-pack, trailing leaders like Norway and Costa Rica.

How free is the internet where you live?

This map ranks 171 countries based on how freely people can access the internet. The results reveal stark global differences, from highly open systems in parts of Europe and Latin America to tightly controlled networks in countries like North Korea and China.

The data comes from a 2026 internet freedom index by Cloudwards, which evaluates national policies across four areas: torrenting, VPN availability, adult content, and political and civic expression.

Where Does the U.S. Rank?

The United States scores 64 out of 100, placing it in the global middle. It ranks alongside countries like Japan and Australia, and below top performers such as Norway (92) and Canada (84).

The UK scores even lower at 52, reflecting stricter regulations in areas like online content access.

The Freest Internet Access Worldwide

No country achieves a perfect score, but 11 countries across four continents share the top spot at 92.

These countries are Belgium, Costa Rica, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Liechtenstein, New Zealand, Norway, Slovakia, Suriname, and Timor-Leste.

The data table below lists countries worldwide alongside their internet freedom scores.

Country Internet Freedom Score
🇧🇪 Belgium 92
🇨🇷 Costa Rica 92
🇩🇰 Denmark 92
🇫🇮 Finland 92
🇮🇸 Iceland 92
🇱🇮 Liechtenstein 92
🇳🇿 New Zealand 92
🇳🇴 Norway 92
🇸🇰 Slovakia 92
🇸🇷 Suriname 92
🇹🇱 Timor-Leste 92
🇦🇩 Andorra 84
🇦🇹 Austria 84
🇧🇿 Belize 84
🇨🇦 Canada 84
🇨🇻 Cape Verde 84
🇨🇱 Chile 84
🇨🇮 Côte d’Ivoire 84
🇭🇷 Croatia 84
🇩🇴 Dominican Republic 84
🇬🇷 Greece 84
🇬🇾 Guyana 84
🇭🇹 Haiti 84
🇯🇲 Jamaica 84
🇽🇰 Kosovo 84
🇱🇹 Lithuania 84
🇱🇺 Luxembourg 84
🇲🇹 Malta 84
🇲🇩 Moldova 84
🇲🇪 Montenegro 84
🇲🇰 North Macedonia 84
🇵🇦 Panama 84
🇵🇱 Poland 84
🇸🇨 Seychelles 84
🇸🇮 Slovenia 84
🇨🇭 Switzerland 84
🇹🇹 Trinidad & Tobago 84
🇺🇾 Uruguay 84
🇮🇪 Ireland 80
🇱🇻 Latvia 80
🇵🇹 Portugal 80
🇸🇪 Sweden 80
🇦🇷 Argentina 76
🇧🇯 Benin 76
🇧🇴 Bolivia 76
🇧🇦 Bosnia & Herzegovina 76
🇨🇾 Cyprus 76
🇫🇯 Fiji 76
🇬🇲 Gambia 76
🇭🇺 Hungary 76
🇱🇷 Liberia 76
🇲🇬 Madagascar 76
🇲🇳 Mongolia 76
🇳🇦 Namibia 76
🇳🇪 Niger 76
🇵🇪 Peru 76
🇧🇬 Bulgaria 72
🇪🇪 Estonia 72
🇬🇭 Ghana 72
🇬🇹 Guatemala 72
🇮🇹 Italy 72
🇲🇽 Mexico 72
🇳🇱 Netherlands 72
🇵🇾 Paraguay 72
🇪🇸 Spain 72
🇹🇼 Taiwan 72
🇦🇴 Angola 68
🇨🇩 Democratic Republic of Congo 68
🇬🇦 Gabon 68
🇲🇼 Malawi 68
🇲🇱 Mali 68
🇲🇺 Mauritius 68
🇲🇿 Mozambique 68
🇵🇬 Papua New Guinea 68
🇨🇬 Republic of the Congo 68
🇸🇳 Senegal 68
🇦🇱 Albania 64
🇦🇺 Australia 64
🇧🇼 Botswana 64
🇨🇫 Central African Republic 64
🇪🇨 Ecuador 64
🇫🇷 France 64
🇬🇪 Georgia 64
🇩🇪 Germany 64
🇬🇼 Guinea-Bissau 64
🇭🇳 Honduras 64
🇭🇰 Hong Kong SAR China 64
🇯🇵 Japan 64
🇱🇸 Lesotho 64
🇲🇻 Maldives 64
🇲🇦 Morocco 64
🇳🇮 Nicaragua 64
🇳🇬 Nigeria 64
🇷🇴 Romania 64
🇷🇸 Serbia 64
🇿🇦 South Africa 64
🇺🇸 United States 64
🇲🇷 Mauritania 60
🇦🇲 Armenia 56
🇧🇮 Burundi 56
🇨🇲 Cameroon 56
🇹🇩 Chad 56
🇸🇿 Eswatini 56
🇬🇳 Guinea 56
🇱🇧 Lebanon 56
🇵🇸 Palestine 56
🇵🇭 Philippines 56
🇷🇼 Rwanda 56
🇹🇯 Tajikistan 56
🇹🇳 Tunisia 56
🇧🇹 Bhutan 52
🇧🇷 Brazil 52
🇨🇴 Colombia 52
🇰🇪 Kenya 52
🇰🇬 Kyrgyzstan 52
🇬🇧 United Kingdom 52
🇿🇲 Zambia 52
🇩🇿 Algeria 48
🇧🇫 Burkina Faso 48
🇩🇯 Djibouti 48
🇳🇵 Nepal 48
🇱🇰 Sri Lanka 48
🇹🇴 Tongo 48
🇿🇼 Zimbabwe 48
🇰🇭 Cambodia 44
🇸🇻 El Salvador 44
🇮🇱 Israel 44
🇸🇴 Somalia 44
🇺🇦 Ukraine 44
🇦🇿 Azerbaijan 36
🇨🇺 Cuba 36
🇬🇶 Equatorial Guinea 36
🇪🇹 Ethiopia 36
🇯🇴 Jordan 36
🇰🇿 Kazakhstan 36
🇰🇼 Kuwait 36
🇱🇦 Laos 36
🇹🇭 Thailand 36
🇻🇪 Venezuela 36
🇧🇭 Bahrain 32
🇲🇾 Malaysia 32
🇸🇬 Singapore 32
🇰🇷 South Korea 32
🇱🇾 Libya 28
🇹🇿 Tanzania 28
🇦🇫 Afghanistan 24
🇧🇳 Brunei 24
🇮🇩 Indonesia 24
🇶🇦 Qatar 24
🇺🇬 Uganda 24
🇺🇿 Uzbekistan 24
🇻🇳 Vietnam 24
🇧🇩 Bangladesh 20
🇧🇾 Belarus 20
🇴🇲 Oman 20
🇮🇶 Iraq 16
🇲🇲 Myanmar (Burma) 16
🇹🇲 Turkmenistan 16
🇪🇬 Egypt 12
🇮🇳 India 12
🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia 12
🇸🇩 Sudan 12
🇸🇾 Syria 12
🇹🇷 Türkiye 12
🇦🇪 United Arab Emirates 12
🇾🇪 Yemen 12
🇨🇳 China 4
🇮🇷 Iran 4
🇵🇰 Pakistan 4
🇷🇺 Russia 4
🇰🇵 North Korea 0

European countries make up over half of this top echelon and are especially concentrated in the Nordics, where Sweden (80) is the only exception. The Nordic countries are widely known for their liberal, tolerant governments and societies.

Perhaps more surprising is the high placement of countries like Suriname and Timor-Leste, developing nations in South America and Asia that have nonetheless imposed minimal restrictions on social media use and online access.

The Bottom of the Scoreboard

On the other side of the spectrum is North Korea (0), where very few citizens have access to the global internet. Instead, most rely on the national intranet service, Kwangmyong, which filters out outside information.

Right behind North Korea are China and Russia, which tie with Iran and Pakistan for the next-lowest scores worldwide (4).

China’s Great Firewall is perhaps the world’s best-known censorship system, used to suppress criticism of the country’s leaders or content related to politically sensitive topics such as the Tiananmen Square protests. It also blocks access to foreign platforms like Facebook and YouTube.

Internet Access in the West

The United States (64) sits near the middle of the ranking, alongside developed democracies such as Australia, France, Germany, and Japan. The United Kingdom (52) scores slightly lower, with recent adult content legislation playing a role.

Across much of the Western world, scores remain relatively high, including in Canada (84), Ireland and Portugal (both 80), and Spain and Italy (both 72).

One notable outlier is South Korea (32), which ranks below countries like Cuba, Kazakhstan, and Venezuela (36), underscoring how content restrictions—not just political systems—shape internet freedom scores.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

If you enjoyed today’s post, check out A Day of Activity on the Internet on Voronoi.Use This Visualization

Ranked: 2026 GDP Growth Forecasts for the World’s 20 Largest Economies

2026-04-20 23:34:00

Published

on

The following content is sponsored by Terzo

2026 GDP Growth Forecasts for the World’s 20 Largest Economies

Geopolitical tensions are putting pressure on global growth, but not all economies are affected equally. Which of the world’s largest economies are set to grow the fastest in 2026?

In this graphic, created in partnership with Terzo, we look at real GDP growth projections for the world’s 20 largest economies. It’s part of our Markets in a Minute series, which delivers quick economic insights.

Ranking GDP Growth by Country

In 2026, India is projected to see the highest GDP growth among economic powerhouses. The IMF raised its forecast due to India’s strong economy in 2025, as well as the reduction in U.S. tariffs on Indian goods.

Country 2026 Projected Real GDP Growth
🇮🇳 India 6.5%
🇮🇩 Indonesia 5.0%
🇨🇳 China 4.4%
🇹🇷 Türkiye 3.4%
🇵🇱 Poland 3.3%
🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia 3.1%
🇺🇸 U.S. 2.3%
🇪🇸 Spain 2.1%
🇦🇺 Australia 2.0%
🇧🇷 Brazil 1.9%
🇰🇷 South Korea 1.9%
🇲🇽 Mexico 1.6%
🇨🇦 Canada 1.5%
🇳🇱 Netherlands 1.2%
🇷🇺 Russia 1.1%
🇫🇷 France 0.9%
🇬🇧 UK 0.8%
🇩🇪 Germany 0.8%
🇯🇵 Japan 0.7%
🇮🇹 Italy 0.5%

Source: IMF World Economic Outlook, April 2026. Real GDP growth is adjusted for inflation.

China takes the third spot among the world’s largest economies with forecasted growth of 4.4%. Its relatively strong prediction is the result of lower U.S. tariff rates on Chinese goods, as well as policy support from Chinese authorities to offset the negative effects of the Middle East conflict.

As a result of the conflict, Saudi Arabia saw the biggest drop in its growth forecast among the world’s largest economies. Experts expect that temporarily reduced oil exports will create a drag on GDP. However, Saudi Arabia is much better off than many of its neighbors due to the East-West pipeline that is able to redirect nearly half of the exports that normally flow through the Strait of Hormuz to the Red Sea instead.

U.S. Economic Growth in 2026

The IMF predicts that the U.S. will have the highest GDP growth among large developed countries, on track for 2.3% in 2026. Boosts to growth come from government spending, interest rate cuts in 2025, and strong productivity. On the flip side, trade barriers and the Middle East war may create moderate drags on growth.

When markets move fast, timely access to the right data makes all the difference. NirvanAI gives quick AI-powered insights to help your company save money on your contracts. 

Visual Capitalist Logo

See how you can unlock cost savings with NirvanAI now.

You may also like

Subscribe

Charted: The $448B AI Spending Surge by Big Tech

2026-04-20 22:27:51

The $448B AI Spending Surge by Big Tech

See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Key Takeaways

  • Big Tech AI capex nearly tripled from $162B in 2022 to $448B in 2025.
  • By late 2025, these companies were spending over $140B per quarter combined.
  • Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet account for the largest share of the increase.

Big Tech is pouring hundreds of billions into AI infrastructure as competition to scale models and cloud capacity intensifies.

This chart is part of Visual Capitalist’s AI Week, sponsored by Terzo. It shows quarterly capital expenditures for five hyperscalers—Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, and Oracle—based on data from Epoch AI, using SEC filings from Q1 2022 to Q4 2025.

Spending accelerated sharply after mid-2023, reflecting a shift from experimentation to full-scale deployment of data centers, chips, and AI-ready cloud infrastructure.

The Big Tech Arms Race for AI

Big Tech’s capex surge signals an all-out infrastructure arms race, where scale in compute, data centers, and chips is becoming the defining advantage in AI.

Across Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, and Oracle, combined capex rose from $162.3 billion in 2022 to $448.3 billion in 2025.

The data below shows a quarterly capex proxy for selected hyperscalers between 2022 and 2025.

Quarter Microsoft
(AI capex, $B)
Amazon
(AI capex, $B)
Alphabet
(AI capex, $B)
Meta
(AI capex, $B)
Oracle
(AI capex, $B)
2022 Q1 6.1 15.1 9.8 5.6 1.1
2022 Q2 8.0 15.8 6.8 7.6 1.4
2022 Q3 6.9 16.5 7.3 9.4 1.7
2022 Q4 6.9 16.9 7.6 9.4 2.4
2023 Q1 7.7 14.2 6.3 7.1 2.6
2023 Q2 9.8 11.7 6.9 6.4 1.9
2023 Q3 11.6 12.7 8.1 6.5 1.3
2023 Q4 11.5 14.8 11.0 8.1 1.1
2024 Q1 14.4 15.0 12.0 6.5 1.7
2024 Q2 18.6 17.8 13.2 8.4 2.8
2024 Q3 19.3 22.8 13.1 8.8 2.3
2024 Q4 22.2 28.3 14.6 14.7 4.0
2025 Q1 20.0 25.1 17.7 13.7 5.9
2025 Q2 23.6 33.1 22.5 17.1 11.1
2025 Q3 28.5 36.1 24.3 19.3 9.6
2025 Q4 36.2 40.5 28.5 22.5 13.0

The inflection point came in mid-2023, when AI spending shifted from gradual growth to a steep acceleration, marking the transition from early adoption to full-scale infrastructure buildout. Epoch AI estimates that combined capex at these five companies has been growing at an average annual rate of 72% since Q2 2023.

By Q4 2025, the five companies were spending a combined $140.6 billion in a single quarter. This surge underscores a fundamental shift. AI infrastructure is no longer a future bet, but a present-day cost of competing that is reshaping how the world’s largest tech companies allocate capital.

The growth was uneven, with Microsoft (+$30B), Amazon (+$25B), and Alphabet (+$19B) posting the biggest increases in quarterly capex from Q1 2022 to Q4 2025.

What Counts as AI Capex Here?

Epoch’s measure is based on two components pulled from SEC filings: cash spending on property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) and new finance leases. It uses structured 10-Q and 10-K filing data instead of company-reported capex figures, since firms do not always define capital expenditures the same way on earnings calls.

That makes the comparison more consistent, but it also comes with limits. Epoch notes that not all of this spending is exclusively AI-related, and excluded operating leases may understate total investment in productive capacity.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Visualizing the Critical Minerals Powering the AI Boom on Voronoi.

It’s AI Week at Visual Capitalist!

2026-04-20 22:15:38

AI WEEK IS HERE ONLY ON VISUAL CAPITALIST APRIL 20-26 SPONSORED BY TERZO

It’s AI Week at Visual Capitalist!

Artificial intelligence is moving from breakthrough to everyday infrastructure.

As models grow more powerful and adoption spreads, AI is becoming one of the most consequential forces shaping business, technology, and society.

AI Week is a special editorial series from Visual Capitalist, in partnership with Terzo, exploring how AI is reshaping the world around us.

Be the first to see daily content drops on our AI page:

Over the course of the week, we’ll break down the data behind:

  • Leading AI models and platforms

  • The business and infrastructure investments powering the space

  • How AI adoption is changing across markets and regions

  • The global trends shaping how people interact with AI

  • And the forces redefining the future of technology

How It Works

  • Daily content drops: Each day, we’ll release new visuals unpacking a critical piece of the AI story.

  • One central page: All AI Week content lives in one place, so you can follow the story as it unfolds.

  • More to explore: The AI category page also connects you to more Visual Capitalist content on the trends transforming artificial intelligence.

About Our Sponsor

AI Week is an editorial partnership between Visual Capitalist and Terzo, an enterprise AI and analytics platform that transforms unstructured business documents into clean, analytics-ready data.

By helping teams turn complex documents into structured insights, Terzo enables smarter financial, procurement, and legal decision-making.

Want to Align Your Brand with Events Like This?

Visual Capitalist editorial weeks bring together data-driven storytelling and a global audience of over 100 million investors, executives, and decision-makers.

As a sponsor, your brand gains exclusive visibility during our largest editorial pushes—from homepage takeovers and dedicated newsletters to high-impact distribution across our social channels. If you want your brand’s name in lights, check out our full content calendar to see what’s available for 2026.

Explore the AI Category Page

Mapped: Average Rent Across 100 U.S. Cities (2026)

2026-04-20 19:47:16

See more visuals like this on the Voronoi app.

Mapped rent prices across the U.S. in 2026, highlighting the most and least affordable cities.

Use This Visualization

Mapped: Average Rent Across 100 U.S. Cities (2026)

See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.

Key Takeaways

  • San Francisco, New York, and Boston top U.S. rents at over $3,500 a month.
  • Six of the 10 most expensive rental markets are in California.
  • The average across 100 cities is $1,843, with many Midwest and Southern cities below $1,200.

Rents across 100 U.S. cities range widely in 2026, from over $3,500 in the most expensive markets to around $1,200 in more affordable regions.

This map visualizes average monthly rent using Zillow’s Observed Rent Index (ZORI), via WalletHub. The data reflects smoothed, seasonally adjusted rents across all residential property types as of February 2026.

With the U.S. average at $1,843, renters in the most expensive cities are paying more than double the national benchmark.

California Accounts for Most of the Highest Rents

California cities dominate the upper end of the rental market, accounting for six of the 10 most expensive locations.

Rank City Average Rent (2026)
1 San Francisco, CA $3,830
2 New York, NY $3,706
3 Boston, MA $3,510
4 Irvine, CA $3,361
5 San Jose, CA $3,222
6 Jersey City, NJ $3,048
7 Miami, FL $2,964
8 Chula Vista, CA $2,904
9 San Diego, CA $2,893
10 Santa Ana, CA $2,804
11 Los Angeles, CA $2,742
12 Anaheim, CA $2,711
13 Naples, FL $2,677
14 Honolulu, HI $2,548
15 Oakland, CA $2,527
16 Washington, DC $2,406
17 Riverside, CA $2,346
18 Chicago, IL $2,292
19 Long Beach, CA $2,287
20 Seattle, WA $2,187
21 Newark, NJ $2,121
22 Gilbert, AZ $2,049
23 Saint Petersburg, FL $2,048
24 Modesto, CA $2,042
25 Stockton, CA $2,010
26 Sacramento, CA $2,006
27 Tampa, FL $1,968
28 Silver Spring, MD $1,954
29 Virginia Beach, VA $1,953
30 Katy, TX $1,896
31 Atlanta, GA $1,888
32 Bakersfield, CA $1,887
33 Lawrenceville, GA $1,881
34 Orlando, FL $1,857
35 Chandler, AZ $1,848
36 Reno, NV $1,830
37 Denver, CO $1,818
38 Nashville, TN $1,772
39 Henderson, NV $1,772
40 Vancouver, WA $1,769
41 Marietta, GA $1,742
42 Philadelphia, PA $1,734
43 Plano, TX $1,717
44 Portland, OR $1,710
45 Baltimore, MD $1,708
46 Knoxville, TN $1,708
47 Charlotte, NC $1,705
48 Boise, ID $1,703
49 Las Vegas, NV $1,695
50 Fresno, CA $1,693
51 Aurora, CO $1,689
52 Spring, TX $1,679
53 Colorado Springs, CO $1,667
54 Durham, NC $1,651
55 Minneapolis, MN $1,638
56 New Orleans, LA $1,625
57 Dallas, TX $1,591
58 Jacksonville, FL $1,576
59 Richmond, VA $1,574
60 Raleigh, NC $1,567
61 Phoenix, AZ $1,556
62 Fort Worth, TX $1,554
63 Mesa, AZ $1,554
64 Houston, TX $1,542
65 Austin, TX $1,531
66 Pittsburgh, PA $1,516
67 Lexington, KY $1,487
68 Saint Paul, MN $1,485
69 Tallahassee, FL $1,484
70 Arlington, TX $1,462
71 Columbia, SC $1,459
72 Albuquerque, NM $1,457
73 Spokane, WA $1,456
74 Winston-Salem, NC $1,445
75 El Paso, TX $1,441
76 Rochester, NY $1,434
77 Corpus Christi, TX $1,433
78 Cincinnati, OH $1,425
79 Kansas City, MO $1,418
80 Columbus, OH $1,415
81 Omaha, NE $1,403
82 Tucson, AZ $1,399
83 Milwaukee, WI $1,398
84 Lubbock, TX $1,388
85 Greensboro, NC $1,382
86 Buffalo, NY $1,381
87 San Antonio, TX $1,361
88 Indianapolis, IN $1,356
89 Louisville, KY $1,352
90 Cleveland, OH $1,344
91 Saint Louis, MO $1,326
92 Detroit, MI $1,318
93 Baton Rouge, LA $1,312
94 Lincoln, NE $1,293
95 Oklahoma City, OK $1,255
96 Memphis, TN $1,234
97 Tulsa, OK $1,207
98 Fort Wayne, IN $1,160
99 Wichita, KS $1,125
100 Toledo, OH $1,060
-- 🇺🇸 U.S. Average (100 Cities) $1,843

At $3,830 per month, San Francisco renters pay more than twice the national average, putting it at the top of the ranking alongside New York and Boston, where rents also exceed $3,500.

Other California cities like Irvine, San Jose, and San Diego also rank near the top. High demand, limited housing supply, and strong local economies continue to drive elevated prices across the state.

Coastal Premiums Remain Intact

Beyond California, other coastal cities also command high rents. New York City and Jersey City remain among the most expensive, reflecting their proximity to major job centers.

Miami has also emerged as one of the priciest markets in the Southeast, fueled by population growth and migration trends.

Affordability Concentrated in the Interior

In contrast, the most affordable rental markets are largely located in the Midwest and South.

In cities like Toledo, Wichita, and Tulsa, average rents remain near or below $1,200, roughly one-third the cost of renting in San Francisco. This gap highlights how location alone can dramatically change a renter’s cost of living, even within the same country.

Learn More on the Voronoi App

If you enjoyed today’s post, check out It Takes 25 Years to Save for a Home in California on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.

Why Europe Will Miss Its 2030 Digital Skills Target

2026-04-20 12:32:47

Why Europe Will Miss Its 2030 Digital Skills Target

Key Takeaways

  • The EU is off track to hit its 80% digital skills target by 2030 at current growth rates.
  • 10 countries saw declines in basic digital skills between 2022 and 2025.
  • Progress is uneven: while some countries are improving quickly, others are moving backward.

Europe’s push to build a digitally skilled population is losing momentum. At the current pace, the region is unlikely to meet its 2030 target.

The chart above, created by The European Correspondent using European Commission DESI data, shows how basic digital skills have changed across EU countries from 2022 to 2025, along with projected progress to 2030. While some countries are making rapid progress, others are slipping, with 10 EU nations reporting outright declines, leaving the EU on track to fall well short of the 80% goal.

This uneven progress points to a growing divide across the bloc. As digital skills become essential for jobs and public services, parts of Europe may fall further behind.

How Digital Skills are Evolving Across Europe

At the current pace, the EU would need to increase digital skills adoption nearly nine times faster to meet its 80% target by 2030, highlighting how far off track the region is despite recent gains.

Country % with basic digital skills (2022) % with basic digital skills (2025) Change (2022–2025)
Hungary 49.1 58.9 9.80
Czechia 59.7 69.1 9.42
Estonia 56.4 62.6 6.24
Belgium 54.2 59.4 5.16
Bulgaria 31.2 35.5 4.34
Lithuania 48.8 52.9 4.07
Netherlands 78.9 82.7 3.76
Germany 48.9 52.2 3.30
Finland 79.2 82.0 2.81
Ireland 70.5 72.9 2.42
Spain 64.2 66.2 2.02
Malta 61.2 63.0 1.79
EU average 53.9 55.6 1.64
Poland 42.9 44.3 1.37
Austria 63.3 64.7 1.35
Denmark 68.7 69.6 0.97
Portugal 55.3 56.0 0.66
Italy 45.6 45.8 0.15
Greece 52.5 52.4 -0.08
Romania 27.8 27.7 -0.09
Sweden 66.6 66.4 -0.16
Cyprus 50.2 49.5 -0.75
France 62.0 59.7 -2.29
Slovenia 49.7 46.7 -2.97
Luxembourg 63.8 60.1 -3.65
Slovakia 55.2 51.3 -3.87
Croatia 63.4 59.0 -4.42
Latvia 50.8 45.3 -5.46

At the top of the rankings, the Netherlands and Finland lead with around 80% or more of adults possessing basic digital skills, followed closely by Ireland and Denmark. At the other end, Romania and Bulgaria remain the lowest, with fewer than half of citizens meeting the baseline threshold.

ℹ “Basic digital skills” refers to the ability to perform tasks across four domains—information, communication, problem-solving, and software use, based on the EU’s DESI framework.

Which Countries Are Moving Forward and Backward?

A notable warning sign: 10 EU countries are moving in reverse. Latvia, Croatia, Slovakia, and others reported lower shares of adults with basic digital skills in 2025 than in 2022, an unexpected shift from what was once steady progress.

On the other side of the ledger, Hungary led the bloc with a 9.8 percentage-point gain, followed closely by Czechia at 9.42 points. Estonia and Belgium also posted notable improvements. That mix of momentum and backsliding makes the regional picture look less like a steady climb and more like a very uneven Wi-Fi signal.

Why the 80% Target Matters

The EU’s 80% target is part of its broader Digital Decade program, designed to ensure citizens can work, learn, and access services in an increasingly digital economy. The European Commission says just 55.6% of the EU population currently has at least basic digital skills, while policymakers have warned that nearly half of EU adults still lack them even as 90% of jobs require some level of digital ability.

The stakes are economic. With roughly 90% of jobs now requiring some level of digital skills, countries that fall behind risk slower growth, weaker job markets, and reduced access to essential digital services.