2025-03-09 20:02:41
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
When living in a neighborhood where a grocery store, pharmacy, or clinic is just a short walk away, errands double as casual walks, bringing health, convenience, and a sense of connection to daily life.
Research shows that walkable communities encourage more physical activity, lower obesity rates, and reduced body mass index (BMI), while also boosting happiness by fostering more social connections.
This map visualizes the 20 most walkable cities in the world, and their average time to walk to key amenities in each city.
The cities are ranked by the average time to walk to key amenities and the share of residents within a 15 minute walk of key amenities. Key amenities include places like schools, hospitals, restaurants, and shops.
Figures comes from the study “A universal framework for inclusive 15-minute cities” by M. Bruno et al. and The Economist.
The study only includes cities with a population of 500,000 or more.
Below, we show the 20 most walkable cities in the world, and the average time it takes citizens to walk to key amenities.
Rank | City | Country | Average time to walk to key amenities |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Milan |
![]() |
6 mins 24 secs |
2 | Copenhagen |
![]() |
6 mins 36 secs |
3 | Turin |
![]() |
7 mins 6 secs |
4 | Dublin |
![]() |
7 mins 24 secs |
5 | Lyon |
![]() |
7 mins 24 secs |
6 | Munich |
![]() |
7 mins 30 secs |
7 | Paris |
![]() |
8 mins 0 secs |
8 | Marseille |
![]() |
8 mins 6 secs |
9 | Genoa |
![]() |
8 mins 6 secs |
10 | Edinburgh |
![]() |
8 mins 12 secs |
11 | Berlin |
![]() |
8 mins 12 secs |
12 | Vienna |
![]() |
8 mins 18 secs |
13 | St. Petersburg |
![]() |
8 mins 18 secs |
14 | Bilbao |
![]() |
8 mins 24 secs |
15 | Bordeaux |
![]() |
8 mins 30 secs |
16 | Minsk |
![]() |
8 mins 36 secs |
17 | Stuttgart |
![]() |
9 mins 6 secs |
18 | Lille |
![]() |
9 mins 6 secs |
19 | Barcelona |
![]() |
9 mins 12 secs |
20 | Oslo |
![]() |
9 mins 30 secs |
European cities are indisputably the most walking-friendly places in the world. Out of the top 50 most walkable cities in the world, 45 are located in Europe, scattered across countries like Italy, Spain, France, Norway, Germany, the UK and others.
Kyoto, Japan is the most walkable non-European city on the list, coming in at 28th.
Other non-European cities in the top 50 include: Taipei, Taiwan (35th), Kathmandu, Nepal (45th), Taichung, Taiwan (49th), and Tokyo, Japan (50th).
Many European cities were established long before the advent of cars, during eras when walking was the primary mode of transportation. This led to dense, compact city centers with narrow streets and close proximity between residential areas, shops, and public spaces.
European cities have also implemented clear policies and frameworks such as the Pan-European Master Plan for Walking, to prioritize walking through urban redesigns, national walking policies, and strategic initiatives.
In contrast, North American cities, typically known for being designed around the automobile, were absent from the top 50. Vancouver, Canada was the highest ranked North American city in the overall list at 53rd.
To learn more about how the world gets around, check out this graphic that visualizes the popularity of different transportation types in the Americas, Europe, and Asia.
The post Mapped: The Most Walkable Cities in the World appeared first on Visual Capitalist.
2025-03-09 06:37:18
See this visualization first on the Voronoi app.
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
And so it’s that time again to spring forward.
It’s on this infamous weekend in March that we all sacrifice one hour of precious sleep in order to get a little more sunlight in our day.
But more and more, people around the world are saying that Daylight Saving Time is outdated and antiquated—and several state governments have acted on this sentiment.
This map by USAFacts highlights the two states that no longer observe the time change (Arizona and Hawaii are permanently on standard time), and the 20 that have passed legislation to switch to Daylight Saving Time permanently.
Below is the data that shows which states have passed permanent legislation so far.
State | Type | Label |
---|---|---|
Florida | Legislation enacted in 2018 | Permanent daylight saving time legislation enacted or resolution passed |
Delaware | Legislation enacted in 2019 | Permanent daylight saving time legislation enacted or resolution passed |
Maine | Legislation enacted in 2019 | Permanent daylight saving time legislation enacted or resolution passed |
Oregon | Legislation enacted in 2019 | Permanent daylight saving time legislation enacted or resolution passed |
Tennessee | Legislation enacted in 2019 | Permanent daylight saving time legislation enacted or resolution passed |
Washington | Legislation enacted in 2019 | Permanent daylight saving time legislation enacted or resolution passed |
Idaho | Legislation enacted in 2020 | Permanent daylight saving time legislation enacted or resolution passed |
Louisiana | Legislation enacted in 2020 | Permanent daylight saving time legislation enacted or resolution passed |
South Carolina | Legislation enacted in 2020 | Permanent daylight saving time legislation enacted or resolution passed |
Utah | Legislation enacted in 2020 | Permanent daylight saving time legislation enacted or resolution passed |
Wyoming | Legislation enacted in 2020 | Permanent daylight saving time legislation enacted or resolution passed |
Colorado | Legislation enacted in 2022 | Permanent daylight saving time legislation enacted or resolution passed |
Kentucky | Resolution passed in 2022 | Permanent daylight saving time legislation enacted or resolution passed |
Alabama | Legislation enacted in 2021 | Permanent daylight saving time legislation enacted or resolution passed |
Georgia | Legislation enacted in 2021 | Permanent daylight saving time legislation enacted or resolution passed |
Minnesota | Legislation enacted in 2021 | Permanent daylight saving time legislation enacted or resolution passed |
Mississippi | Legislation enacted in 2021 | Permanent daylight saving time legislation enacted or resolution passed |
Montana | Legislation enacted in 2021 | Permanent daylight saving time legislation enacted or resolution passed |
Ohio | Resolution passed in 2023 | Permanent daylight saving time legislation enacted or resolution passed |
Arizona | Opted out of daylight saving time in 1968. The Navajo Nation in northeast Arizona observes daylight saving time. | Permanent standard time |
Hawaii | Did not adopt daylight saving time after the passage of the Uniform Time Act. | Permanent standard time |
Oklahoma | Legislation enacted in 2024 | Permanent daylight saving time legislation enacted or resolution passed |
Interestingly, even with 20 states wanting permanent Daylight Saving Time throughout the year, it’s all basically moot.
That’s because states can’t legally adopt DST permanently unless the federal government acts first. And although a bill to do this has been introduced multiple times in Congress (“The Sunshine Protection Act”) since 2018, it has yet to be enacted.
So for now, you’ll have to swallow the tough pill of less sleep to get your evening light. But in the future, who knows?
What does the sun’s schedule look like in London, Sydney, and New York under Daylight Saving Time? Check out this slideshow on Voronoi to see.
The post Mapped: Which U.S. States Want to Scrap the Time Change Permanently? appeared first on Visual Capitalist.
2025-03-09 03:42:01
See this visualization first on the Voronoi app.
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Where do women work the most, why is this an important measure to track, and what can it tell us about a country?
We map out relevant data to answer these questions, sourced from 2025 estimates made by the International Labour Organization.
It shows the share of working-age women (15–64) who are employed or looking for work in each country, also known as the labor force participation rate.
As a general trend: women’s workforce participation spikes in either very poor countries, or very rich ones.
For example, the highest rates can be seen in North Korea and Madagascar (84–87%), and Iceland and the Netherlands (82–84%).
Per current World Bank classification, the former are low-income countries, and the latter are high-income countries.
Rank | Country | ISO Code | Women Workforce Participation Rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
PRK | 87 |
2 |
![]() |
SLB | 84 |
3 |
![]() |
MDG | 84 |
4 |
![]() |
ISL | 84 |
5 |
![]() |
NLD | 82 |
6 |
![]() |
SWE | 82 |
7 |
![]() |
NGA | 82 |
8 |
![]() |
TZA | 82 |
9 |
![]() |
BDI | 81 |
10 |
![]() |
EST | 81 |
11 |
![]() |
CHE | 80 |
12 |
![]() |
NZL | 80 |
13 |
![]() |
FIN | 80 |
14 |
![]() |
KHM | 79 |
15 |
![]() |
DNK | 79 |
16 |
![]() |
MOZ | 78 |
17 |
![]() |
NOR | 78 |
18 |
![]() |
UGA | 78 |
19 |
![]() |
CAN | 78 |
20 |
![]() |
LTU | 78 |
21 |
![]() |
AUS | 77 |
22 |
![]() |
JPN | 77 |
23 |
![]() |
BLR | 76 |
24 |
![]() |
DEU | 76 |
25 |
![]() |
KAZ | 76 |
26 |
![]() |
PRT | 76 |
27 |
![]() |
BEN | 76 |
28 |
![]() |
CYP | 76 |
29 |
![]() |
BHS | 76 |
30 |
![]() |
ERI | 75 |
31 |
![]() |
VNM | 75 |
32 |
![]() |
BOL | 75 |
33 |
![]() |
LVA | 74 |
34 |
![]() |
AUT | 74 |
35 |
![]() |
BRB | 74 |
36 |
![]() |
AGO | 74 |
37 |
![]() |
MLT | 74 |
38 |
![]() |
HUN | 74 |
39 |
![]() |
GBR | 74 |
40 |
![]() |
IRL | 74 |
41 |
![]() |
LBR | 73 |
42 |
![]() |
SVN | 73 |
43 |
![]() |
MDA | 73 |
44 |
![]() |
SVK | 73 |
45 |
![]() |
ISR | 73 |
46 |
![]() |
URY | 71 |
47 |
![]() |
SGP | 71 |
48 |
![]() |
FRA | 71 |
49 |
![]() |
RUS | 71 |
50 |
![]() |
CZE | 71 |
51 |
![]() |
LUX | 71 |
52 |
![]() |
LCA | 71 |
53 |
![]() |
ESP | 71 |
54 |
![]() |
BGR | 70 |
55 |
![]() |
PER | 70 |
56 |
![]() |
CHN | 69 |
57 |
![]() |
POL | 69 |
58 |
![]() |
USA | 69 |
59 |
![]() |
ARM | 69 |
60 |
![]() |
THA | 68 |
61 |
![]() |
AZE | 68 |
62 |
![]() |
MAC | 68 |
63 |
![]() |
BWA | 67 |
64 |
![]() |
COG | 67 |
65 |
![]() |
BEL | 67 |
66 |
![]() |
TWN | 67 |
67 |
![]() |
JAM | 67 |
68 |
![]() |
HRV | 67 |
69 |
![]() |
GUM | 67 |
70 |
![]() |
SRB | 66 |
71 |
![]() |
CAF | 66 |
72 |
![]() |
HKG | 66 |
73 |
![]() |
CHI | 65 |
74 |
![]() |
ALB | 65 |
75 |
![]() |
QAT | 65 |
76 |
![]() |
VCT | 65 |
77 |
![]() |
VIR | 65 |
78 |
![]() |
LAO | 65 |
79 |
![]() |
KOR | 64 |
80 |
![]() |
MWI | 64 |
81 |
![]() |
COD | 63 |
82 |
![]() |
GHA | 63 |
83 |
![]() |
PRY | 63 |
84 |
![]() |
KEN | 63 |
85 |
![]() |
ARG | 62 |
86 |
![]() |
GRC | 62 |
87 |
![]() |
HTI | 62 |
88 |
![]() |
GEO | 61 |
89 |
![]() |
CHL | 61 |
90 |
![]() |
TLS | 61 |
91 |
![]() |
BRA | 61 |
92 |
![]() |
NER | 61 |
93 |
![]() |
ZWE | 61 |
94 |
![]() |
RWA | 60 |
95 |
![]() |
CIV | 60 |
96 |
![]() |
NCL | 60 |
97 |
![]() |
MLI | 60 |
98 |
![]() |
BTN | 59 |
99 |
![]() |
ETH | 59 |
100 |
![]() |
TTO | 59 |
101 |
![]() |
DOM | 59 |
102 |
![]() |
PAN | 59 |
103 |
![]() |
BRN | 58 |
104 |
![]() |
ITA | 58 |
105 |
![]() |
ZAF | 58 |
106 |
![]() |
COL | 58 |
107 |
![]() |
TGO | 57 |
108 |
![]() |
ROU | 57 |
109 |
![]() |
NAM | 57 |
110 |
![]() |
MNG | 57 |
111 |
![]() |
KGZ | 57 |
112 |
![]() |
CMR | 57 |
113 |
![]() |
MYS | 57 |
114 |
![]() |
ARE | 56 |
115 |
![]() |
CPV | 56 |
116 |
![]() |
GNB | 56 |
117 |
![]() |
ECU | 56 |
118 |
![]() |
VUT | 56 |
119 |
![]() |
IDN | 55 |
120 |
![]() |
MKD | 54 |
121 |
![]() |
ZMB | 54 |
122 |
![]() |
GNQ | 54 |
123 |
![]() |
MNE | 53 |
124 |
![]() |
NIC | 53 |
125 |
![]() |
TKM | 53 |
126 |
![]() |
PYF | 53 |
127 |
![]() |
BIH | 53 |
128 |
![]() |
SLE | 52 |
129 |
![]() |
BLZ | 52 |
130 |
![]() |
MEX | 52 |
131 |
![]() |
PHL | 52 |
132 |
![]() |
PNG | 51 |
133 |
![]() |
MUS | 51 |
134 |
![]() |
SLV | 51 |
135 |
![]() |
KWT | 51 |
136 |
![]() |
CRI | 51 |
137 |
![]() |
LSO | 51 |
138 |
![]() |
SUR | 51 |
139 |
![]() |
CUB | 49 |
140 |
![]() |
TCD | 49 |
141 |
![]() |
SWZ | 48 |
142 |
![]() |
BGD | 48 |
143 |
![]() |
GMB | 47 |
144 |
![]() |
BHR | 45 |
145 |
![]() |
MMR | 45 |
146 |
![]() |
PRI | 45 |
147 |
![]() |
TON | 44 |
148 |
![]() |
GUY | 44 |
149 |
![]() |
COM | 44 |
150 |
![]() |
UZB | 44 |
151 |
![]() |
MDV | 43 |
152 |
![]() |
GAB | 43 |
153 |
![]() |
GIN | 43 |
154 |
![]() |
TUR | 42 |
155 |
![]() |
GTM | 42 |
156 |
![]() |
BFA | 42 |
157 |
![]() |
VEN | 42 |
158 |
![]() |
HND | 41 |
159 |
![]() |
FJI | 41 |
160 |
![]() |
SEN | 38 |
161 |
![]() |
SAU | 36 |
162 |
![]() |
LKA | 36 |
163 |
![]() |
IND | 35 |
164 |
![]() |
LBY | 35 |
165 |
![]() |
TJK | 33 |
166 |
![]() |
ESH | 33 |
167 |
![]() |
WSM | 33 |
168 |
![]() |
OMN | 32 |
169 |
![]() |
TUN | 30 |
170 |
![]() |
NPL | 30 |
171 |
![]() |
MRT | 27 |
172 |
![]() |
PAK | 26 |
173 |
![]() |
STP | 23 |
174 |
![]() |
SOM | 22 |
175 |
![]() |
MAR | 21 |
176 |
![]() |
DJI | 20 |
177 |
![]() |
EGY | 16 |
178 |
![]() |
DZA | 15 |
179 |
![]() |
JOR | 15 |
180 |
![]() |
IRN | 15 |
181 |
![]() |
SYR | 14 |
182 |
![]() |
IRQ | 11 |
183 |
![]() |
AFG | 5 |
184 |
![]() |
YEM | 5 |
N/A |
![]() |
WRLD | 55 |
Meanwhile, many middle income countries (India, Nepal) only have one-third of eligible working age women actively employed or looking for work.
This trend solidifies when looking at middle income countries where culturally, women are expected to place familial duties above outside professional or personal ones (Egypt, 16%).
In low-income countries, women often work in subsistence agriculture, where labor is crucial for survival.
Then, in middle income countries, labor moves away from survival and towards industry. Here, societal norms may discourage women from working.
But coming around, in high-income countries, education, childcare services, and a services-based economy broaden opportunities for women to work.
Part of Europe’s higher women workforce participation rate is the effect it has on children being born, as the opportunity cost of not working rises. Check out creator Arcioman’s Mapped: When Does a Woman Have Her First Child to see correlations.
The post Mapped: The Countries Where the Most Women Work in 2025 appeared first on Visual Capitalist.
2025-03-09 00:32:00
Producing Canadian aluminum is energy-intensive. Creating a metric ton of this versatile material takes nearly 15,000 kilowatt hours–enough electricity to power a typical U.S. household for 16 months.
With the U.S. planning to place tariffs on metals coming from Canada and increase its efforts to start domestic production, we ask: what would the replacement of 2.7 million metric tons of Canadian aluminum mean for America’s energy consumption?
To answer this question, Visual Capitalist has partnered with the Aluminum Association of Canada to explore the potential cost of the U.S. abandoning aluminum imported from Canada.
Aluminum’s versatility has made it essential in various industries. The U.S. consumes between 4 and 5 million metric tons annually, with a large portion sourced from Canada.
In 2024, the nation’s primary aluminum production totaled around 678,000 metric tons, the energy cost of which would have been around 10 million megawatt-hours—around the Hoover Dams’ annual electricity production.
However, the U.S. imported 2.7 million metric tons of Canadian aluminum in 2024. So, what would the energy needs be if the U.S. were to onshore all Canadian aluminum it imports?
If the U.S. were to onshore all 2.7 million metric tons of Canadian aluminum it imported in 2024, the energy requirement would skyrocket to over 40 million megawatt-hours of electricity. This is nearly four and a half times the annual electricity production of the Hoover Dam, enough to power 460 data centers or the entire state of Nevada for a year.
Producing aluminum in Canada is simple for two vital reasons: infrastructure and energy.
Thanks to its world-class infrastructure and access to vast supplies of clean energy, Canada offers the U.S. a reliable, low-carbon source of aluminum.
Severing this relationship would not only mean massive financial and energy costs but also a significant setback in sustainability efforts, underlining the urgency of maintaining this partnership.
Chinese brands accounted for 62% of global EV sales in 2024.
Production and refining costs, transportation and distribution fares, and taxes and subsidies all affect how much everyone pays for gas.
Copper and lithium will require the highest number of new mines.
Russia controls nearly half of global uranium enrichment capacity.
President-elect Donald Trump wants a massive boost in U.S. oil production to reduce energy costs.
Oklahoma has the cheapest fuel, while Hawaii is the most expensive.
The post Visualized: What Cutting Canadian Aluminum Would Cost the U.S. appeared first on Visual Capitalist.
2025-03-08 22:25:00
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
In honor of International Women’s Day, we’ve compiled a ranking of the 12 richest self-made women in the U.S., according to Forbes as of February 2025. The ranking is included in the table below.
Rank | Name | Net Worth ($B) |
---|---|---|
1 | Diane Hendricks | 21.9 |
2 | Judy Love | 13.1 |
3 | Judy Faulkner | 7.7 |
4 | Thai Lee | 7.0 |
5 | Lynda Resnick | 6.3 |
6 | Elizabeth Uihlein | 5.7 |
7 | Jayshree Ullal | 4.5 |
8 | Gail Miller | 4.4 |
9 | Johnelle Hunt | 4.3 |
10 | Eren Ozmen | 4.0 |
11 | Peggy Cherng | 4.0 |
12 | Marian Ilitch | 3.9 |
At the top of the list, Diane Hendricks chairs ABC Supply, one of the largest wholesale distributors of roofing, siding, and windows in the United States. She co-founded the business with her late husband, Ken, in Beloit, Wisconsin, in 1982.
Since Ken’s passing in 2007, Hendricks has led the company’s expansion, spearheading its two largest acquisitions—Bradco in 2010 and L&W Supply in 2016.
In second place is Judy Love. She co-founded Love’s Travel Stops & Country Stores with her late husband, Tom, in 1964. They launched with a leased gas station in Watonga, Oklahoma, using a $5,000 loan from Tom’s parents.
Our list also includes Peggy Cherng, co-founder and co-CEO of the Chinese fast-food chain Panda Express, and Marian Ilitch, co-founder of Little Caesars Pizza and owner of the Detroit Red Wings NHL team.
Female billionaires who just missed the top 12 ranking include:
If you enjoyed this post, check out The Richest Politicians in the U.S. on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.
The post Ranked: America’s Richest Self-Made Women in 2025 appeared first on Visual Capitalist.
2025-03-08 21:07:04
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
In this map, we list the current fertility rate of each country in North and South America. Countries are also shaded by whether its fertility rate is above or below the population replacement rate (2.1).
Data for this graphic is from the UN World Population Prospects’ 2025 estimates and can be viewed in the table below. Only sovereign countries are included.
Country | ISO Code | Fertility Rate 2025 |
---|---|---|
![]() |
CHL | 1.1 |
![]() |
CRI | 1.3 |
![]() |
CAN | 1.3 |
![]() |
JAM | 1.3 |
![]() |
BHS | 1.4 |
![]() |
LCA | 1.4 |
![]() |
URY | 1.4 |
![]() |
CUB | 1.5 |
![]() |
GRD | 1.5 |
![]() |
DMA | 1.5 |
![]() |
ARG | 1.5 |
![]() |
KNA | 1.5 |
![]() |
TTO | 1.5 |
![]() |
ATG | 1.6 |
![]() |
BRA | 1.6 |
![]() |
COL | 1.6 |
![]() |
USA | 1.6 |
![]() |
BRB | 1.7 |
![]() |
VCT | 1.7 |
![]() |
SLV | 1.8 |
![]() |
ECU | 1.8 |
![]() |
MEX | 1.9 |
![]() |
PER | 1.9 |
![]() |
BLZ | 2.0 |
![]() |
VEN | 2.1 |
![]() |
PAN | 2.1 |
![]() |
NIC | 2.2 |
![]() |
DOM | 2.2 |
![]() |
SUR | 2.2 |
![]() |
GTM | 2.3 |
![]() |
GUY | 2.4 |
![]() |
PRY | 2.4 |
![]() |
HND | 2.5 |
![]() |
BOL | 2.5 |
![]() |
HTI | 2.6 |
The fertility rate measures the average number of children a woman in a specific area will have over the course of her lifetime.
In fact, 2.1 is a key threshold. At this level, the area’s population remains self-sustaining Above it, populations grow. Below it, populations decline.
As seen from the map, most of the Americas, including its largest countries, the U.S., Brazil, Canada, and Mexico, are all below the 2.1 threshold.
There’s a time factor involved with the effects of fertility rates. Population decline usually occurs after a lag, usually three decades of below-replacement fertility rates.
This can be seen in Europe, whose population peaked in 2021, after persistently low rates since the 1970s.
Unlike Europe, the U.S. fertility rate has only consistently stayed below 2.1 since the mid 2000s.
However, Canada and Mexico have had below-replacement rates for decades. In their case (and with the U.S.) immigration becomes critical for sustaining population growth.
Wondering what this same map looks like for Europe? Check out: Mapped: European Fertility Rates by Country in 2025 for a quick overview.
The post Mapped: Fertility Rates in North and South America appeared first on Visual Capitalist.