2025-01-30 21:11:03
See this visualization first on the Voronoi app.
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
The cost of renting is anything but uniform—shaped by geography, neighborhood trends, and even the quirks of a few city blocks. What’s affordable in one part of town might be out of reach just a short walk away.
This map, created by NeoMam Studios for CashNetUSA, visualizes the most affordable ZIP codes to rent across America.
NeoMam Studios compared the average household incomes and annual rent costs in each ZIP code using U.S. Census data and Zillow’s Observed Rent Index (ZORI). ZIP codes were ranked by affordability, the most affordable being the ZIP codes with the lowest rental costs as a percentage of local incomes.
Figures below 30% of gross income were considered as the standard affordable rent outlay defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Below, we show each state’s most affordable ZIP code, the ZIP code’s location, and its average annual rent (from ZORI) as a share of local median household income.
State | ZIP Code | Location | Annual Rent as % of Local Median Household Income | Avg. Rent Cost (ZORI, $) | Median Household Income ($) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kansas | 66224 | Leawood | 10.57% | $1,850.00 | $143,093 |
Michigan | 48324 | West Bloomfield | 11.50% | $3,069.76 | $203,000 |
Texas | 78248 | San Antonio | 12.29% | $2,231.67 | $138,220 |
Pennsylvania | 15228 | Pittsburgh | 12.57% | $1,960.28 | $128,333 |
Iowa | 50323 | Urbandale | 12.77% | $1,734.63 | $145,774 |
South Dakota | 57005 | Brandon | 13.51% | $2,648.78 | $185,093 |
Ohio | 43035 | Lewis Center | 13.71% | $2,048.33 | $132,573 |
Illinois | 60304 | Oak Park | 13.92% | $1,259.17 | $122,986 |
North Dakota | 58554 | Mandan | 14.23% | $1,021.94 | $76,612 |
Indiana | 46077 | Zionsville | 14.28% | $1,255.50 | $131,002 |
Minnesota | 55906 | Rochester | 14.57% | $1,561.98 | $125,060 |
Missouri | 63141 | Creve Coeur | 14.93% | $2,104.16 | $152,326 |
Tennessee | 38024 | Dyersburg | 14.95% | $1,475.98 | $127,195 |
Alabama | 35213 | Mountain Brook | 14.99% | $1,570.11 | $137,408 |
Arkansas | 72223 | Little Rock | 15.19% | $1,217.72 | $116,278 |
Arizona | 85253 | Paradise Valley | 15.27% | $969.22 | $71,601 |
Nebraska | 68130 | Omaha | 15.29% | $1,540.35 | $109,405 |
Louisiana | 70605 | Lake Charles | 15.38% | $1,043.45 | $81,404 |
New York | 11731 | East Northport | 15.51% | $2,025.78 | $138,261 |
Wyoming | 82716 | Gillette | 16.01% | $1,816.65 | $111,410 |
Wisconsin | 54956 | Neenah | 16.24% | $2,033.56 | $159,846 |
Georgia | 30005 | Alpharetta | 16.58% | $1,929.44 | $98,459 |
Kentucky | 40059 | Prospect | 16.72% | $2,716.04 | $170,000 |
North Carolina | 27613 | Raleigh | 16.90% | $1,940.98 | $83,946 |
New Jersey | 7090 | Westfield | 17.17% | $1,387.50 | $55,402 |
Mississippi | 38801 | Tupelo | 17.25% | $2,040.67 | $137,097 |
Oklahoma | 73142 | Oklahoma City | 17.28% | $1,750.91 | $116,756 |
Maryland | 21043 | Ellicott City | 17.58% | $1,397.75 | $112,328 |
West Virginia | 26062 | Weirton | 17.80% | $2,563.01 | $163,333 |
Virginia | 23113 | Midlothian | 17.86% | $2,041.67 | $103,934 |
South Carolina | 29708 | Fort Mill | 18.00% | $623.89 | $50,064 |
California | 94062 | Emerald Lake Hills | 18.15% | $916.67 | $59,482 |
Florida | 33556 | Odessa | 18.33% | $1,935.56 | $124,449 |
Utah | 84025 | Farmington | 18.49% | $2,243.88 | $161,079 |
Montana | 59501 | Havre | 18.49% | $1,489.03 | $116,849 |
Connecticut | 6410 | Cheshire | 18.54% | $810.56 | $56,393 |
Oregon | 97221 | Portland | 18.66% | $1,425.00 | $55,511 |
Colorado | 80108 | Castle Pines | 18.83% | $1,170.83 | $96,403 |
Washington | 98040 | Mercer Island | 19.17% | $1,204.58 | $83,648 |
Massachusetts | 1720 | Acton | 19.37% | $2,050.00 | $117,408 |
Nevada | 89511 | Reno | 19.57% | $1,950.00 | $100,751 |
Idaho | 83221 | Blackfoot | 19.95% | $1,234.43 | $97,530 |
New Mexico | 87544 | Los Alamos | 20.95% | $1,662.43 | $107,901 |
Alaska | 99517 | Anchorage | 22.12% | $1,062.50 | $63,897 |
New Hampshire | 3045 | Goffstown | 23.23% | $1,113.33 | $98,902 |
Delaware | 19810 | Wilmington | 23.52% | $1,522.56 | $172,829 |
Rhode Island | 2865 | Lincoln | 23.57% | $791.67 | $53,360 |
Hawaii | 96822 | Honolulu | 27.75% | $1,584.86 | $85,964 |
Maine | 4210 | Auburn | 30.05% | $1,731.25 | $162,705 |
Vermont | 5701 | Rutland | 30.80% | $917.50 | $77,356 |
The average rent in Leawood 66224, Kansas, costs 10.57% of the local average income—the most affordable rent level of any U.S. ZIP code.
The 66224 ZIP code is right at the border of Kansas and Missouri, and just a couple of ZIP codes south of Leawood 66211, home to Kansas’ priciest residential real estate.
Midland, Texas, has the highest proportion of affordable housing against local incomes, with 97.5% of rentals available below 30% of the local average income.
Several ZIP codes within major metropolitan areas ranked as the most affordable in their states, including Portland (97221) in Oregon and Pittsburgh (15228) in Pennsylvania.
Over on the West Coast, Los Angeles doesn’t have a single ZIP code where the average home is affordable to rent, according to the 30% rule.
To learn more about housing affordability in the U.S., check out this graphic that visualizes median house prices in the U.S.
The post Mapped: The Most Affordable ZIP Code for Renters by State appeared first on Visual Capitalist.
2025-01-30 20:18:11
See this visualization first on the Voronoi app.
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Across the 7,000 languages spoken worldwide, just five languages command roughly half of the global population.
With 1.5 billion speakers, English is spoken more than any other language, followed by Mandarin (1.2 billion), and Hindi (610 million). Given its prevalence in business and political spheres, it continues to be the most sought-after language to learn today even as proficiency in China, Japan, and South Korea has declined in recent years.
This graphic from NeoMam Studios shows the most popular languages to learn in 2024, based on data from Word.Tips.
For the rankings, monthly Google search volumes were analyzed across countries based on “Study X language” or “Learn X language”. These phrases were translated across 119 of the most-spoken languages globally.
Each language was ranked according to their search volume as of May 2024, shown in the table below:
Country | Most Popular Language | Second Most Popular Language |
---|---|---|
Algeria | Arabic | French |
Bahrain | Arabic | German |
Egypt | Arabic | English |
Iraq | Arabic | English |
Jordan | Arabic | German |
Kuwait | Arabic | German |
Lebanon | Arabic | English |
Libya | Arabic | English |
Morocco | Arabic | English |
Oman | Arabic | English |
Palestine | Arabic | English |
Qatar | Arabic | English |
Saudi Arabia | Arabic | Chinese |
Uganda | Arabic | Bengali |
United Arab Emirates | Arabic | German |
Guyana | Chinese | Spanish |
Hong Kong | Chinese | Spanish |
Laos | Chinese | English |
Taiwan | Chinese | Minnan |
Venezuela | Chinese | Russian |
Afghanistan | English | Farsi |
Angola | English | French |
Armenia | English | German |
Austria | English | Italian |
Azerbaijan | English | Russian |
Belarus | English | Russian |
Benin | English | German |
Bolivia | English | Japanese |
Brazil | English | Spanish |
Bulgaria | English | German |
Cambodia | English | Chinese |
Cameroon | English | German |
Colombia | English | Italian |
Costa Rica | English | Spanish |
Cote D'Ivoire | English | Arabic |
Democratic Republic of the Congo | English | Swahili |
Ecuador | English | Italian |
El Salvador | English | Italian |
Estonia | English | German |
Ethiopia | English | Arabic |
Finland | English | Ukrainian |
France | English | Spanish |
Georgia | English | German |
Germany | English | Spanish |
Guatemala | English | Spanish |
Honduras | English | Russian |
Hungary | English | German |
Indonesia | English | Arabic |
Israel | English | Arabic |
Italy | English | Italian |
Jamaica | English | Chinese |
Japan | English | Korean |
Kazakhstan | English | Russian |
Kyrgyzstan | English | German |
Latvia | English | German |
Mauritius | English | German |
Mexico | English | Spanish |
Moldova | English | Italian |
Montenegro | English | German |
Mozambique | English | French |
Nicaragua | English | Russian |
Nigeria | English | Hausa |
Pakistan | English | Korean |
Paraguay | English | Portuguese |
Peru | English | Italian |
Poland | English | Polish |
Portugal | English | Portuguese |
Republic of the Congo | English | Chinese |
Romania | English | German |
Rwanda | English | German |
Senegal | English | Arabic |
Somalia | English | Arabic |
Sweden | English | Thai |
Tanzania | English | Swahili |
Thailand | English | Chinese |
Tunisia | English | Arabic |
Turkey | English | Polish |
Turkmenistan | English | Russian |
Ukraine | English | Ukrainian |
United Kingdom | English | Spanish |
Uzbekistan | English | Russian |
Vietnam | English | Chinese |
Zambia | English | German |
Philippines | Filipino | Korean |
Bahamas | French | Spanish |
Botswana | French | German |
Canada | French | Japanese |
Netherlands | French | English |
Albania | German | English |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | German | English |
Croatia | German | Arabic |
Cyprus | German | English |
Denmark | German | Spanish |
Ghana | German | English |
Greece | German | English |
Kenya | German | French |
Luxembourg | German | French |
Malta | German | English |
Namibia | German | Portuguese |
North Macedonia | German | English |
Serbia | German | French |
Slovakia | German | English |
Slovenia | German | Japanese |
Zimbabwe | German | English |
Fiji | Hindi | Chinese |
Argentina | Italian | English |
Chile | Italian | Korean |
Switzerland | Italian | English |
Uruguay | Italian | Spanish |
Australia | Japanese | Spanish |
South Korea | Japanese | English |
Bangladesh | Korean | Bengali |
Bhutan | Korean | Chinese |
Brunei | Korean | Malayalam |
India | Korean | English |
Mongolia | Korean | German |
Myanmar | Korean | Japanese |
Nepal | Korean | Japanese |
Singapore | Korean | Chinese |
Sri Lanka | Korean | English |
Malaysia | Malayalam | English |
Lithuania | Russian | English |
Russia | Russian | English |
Belgium | Spanish | Arabic |
Czech Republic | Spanish | Polish |
Dominican Republic | Spanish | English |
Iceland | Spanish | German |
Ireland | Spanish | French |
New Zealand | Spanish | Filipino |
Norway | Spanish | Urdu |
Panama | Spanish | English |
Puerto Rico | Spanish | Arabic |
Spain | Spanish | English |
Trinidad and Tobago | Spanish | Arabic |
United States | Spanish | Japanese |
South Africa | Zulu | Swahili |
Overall, English is the most desired language to learn in 63 countries, dropping substantially from 98 countries in 2021.
Due to shifting geopolitical dynamics, English proficiency is falling across East Asia. For instance, China ranked 91st out of 116 countries on English proficiency compared to ranking 38th four years earlier. Despite this, English is the most popular language people want to learn across virtually every global region.
Ranking in second is German, driven by its popularity in European nations including Greece, Denmark, and Croatia. While it falls behind English by a wide margin, it stands as the most sought-after language to learn in 16 countries likely due to Germany being the world’s third-largest economy.
Arabic follows next in line, being the top language in 15 countries mostly found in the Middle East. Since 2021, this number has grown by more than double as countries like Saudi Arabia and Egypt witnessed strong search volumes. Globally, Arabic is the sixth-most common language, with 274 million speakers around the world.
To learn more about this topic from a global perspective, check out this graphic on the 12 most spoken languages globally.
The post Mapped: The Most Popular Languages to Learn by Country appeared first on Visual Capitalist.
2025-01-30 03:47:42
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
This graphic tracks America’s, Russia’s, and China’s government leaders since 1975 using data from Britannica.
Only one of these countries is a functioning democracy—though all three hold some form of elections. Thus, this graphic is not a comparison but serves as a look back through history.
Since 1975, the U.S. has had eight different presidents. In that same time, Russia has had six leaders, and China four.
Year | U.S. | Russia / Societ Union Pre-1991 | China |
---|---|---|---|
2025 | Donald Trump | Vladimir Putin | Xi Jinping |
2024 | Joe Biden | Vladimir Putin | Xi Jinping |
2023 | Joe Biden | Vladimir Putin | Xi Jinping |
2022 | Joe Biden | Vladimir Putin | Xi Jinping |
2021 | Joe Biden | Vladimir Putin | Xi Jinping |
2020 | Donald Trump | Vladimir Putin | Xi Jinping |
2019 | Donald Trump | Vladimir Putin | Xi Jinping |
2018 | Donald Trump | Vladimir Putin | Xi Jinping |
2017 | Donald Trump | Vladimir Putin | Xi Jinping |
2016 | Barack Obama | Vladimir Putin | Xi Jinping |
2015 | Barack Obama | Vladimir Putin | Xi Jinping |
2014 | Barack Obama | Vladimir Putin | Xi Jinping |
2013 | Barack Obama | Vladimir Putin | Xi Jinping |
2012 | Barack Obama | Vladimir Putin | Xi Jinping |
2011 | Barack Obama | Dmitry Medvedev | Hu Jintao |
2010 | Barack Obama | Dmitry Medvedev | Hu Jintao |
2009 | Barack Obama | Dmitry Medvedev | Hu Jintao |
2008 | George W. Bush | Dmitry Medvedev | Hu Jintao |
2007 | George W. Bush | Vladimir Putin | Hu Jintao |
2006 | George W. Bush | Vladimir Putin | Hu Jintao |
2005 | George W. Bush | Vladimir Putin | Hu Jintao |
2004 | George W. Bush | Vladimir Putin | Hu Jintao |
2003 | George W. Bush | Vladimir Putin | Hu Jintao |
2002 | George W. Bush | Vladimir Putin | Hu Jintao |
2001 | George W. Bush | Vladimir Putin | Jiang Zemin |
2000 | Bill Clinton | Vladimir Putin | Jiang Zemin |
1999 | Bill Clinton | Vladimir Putin | Jiang Zemin |
1998 | Bill Clinton | Boris Yeltsin | Jiang Zemin |
1997 | Bill Clinton | Boris Yeltsin | Jiang Zemin |
1996 | Bill Clinton | Boris Yeltsin | Jiang Zemin |
1995 | Bill Clinton | Boris Yeltsin | Jiang Zemin |
1994 | Bill Clinton | Boris Yeltsin | Jiang Zemin |
1993 | Bill Clinton | Boris Yeltsin | Jiang Zemin |
1992 | George H. W. Bush | Boris Yeltsin | Jiang Zemin |
1991 | George H. W. Bush | Boris Yeltsin | Jiang Zemin |
1990 | George H. W. Bush | Mikhail Gorbachev | Jiang Zemin |
1989 | George H. W. Bush | Mikhail Gorbachev | Jiang Zemin |
1988 | Ronald Reagan | Mikhail Gorbachev | Deng Xiaoping |
1987 | Ronald Reagan | Mikhail Gorbachev | Deng Xiaoping |
1986 | Ronald Reagan | Mikhail Gorbachev | Deng Xiaoping |
1985 | Ronald Reagan | Mikhail Gorbachev | Deng Xiaoping |
1984 | Ronald Reagan | Konstantin Chernenko | Deng Xiaoping |
1983 | Ronald Reagan | Yuri Andropov | Deng Xiaoping |
1982 | Ronald Reagan | Yuri Andropov | Deng Xiaoping |
1981 | Ronald Reagan | Leonid Brezhnev | Deng Xiaoping |
1980 | Jimmy Carter | Leonid Brezhnev | Deng Xiaoping |
1979 | Jimmy Carter | Leonid Brezhnev | Deng Xiaoping |
1978 | Jimmy Carter | Leonid Brezhnev | Deng Xiaoping |
1977 | Jimmy Carter | Leonid Brezhnev | Hua Guofeng |
1976 | Gerald Ford | Leonid Brezhnev | Hua Guofeng |
1975 | Gerald Ford | Leonid Brezhnev | Mao Zedong |
From this graphic, we can see that POTUS has regularly shifted back and forth between the Democrat and Republican parties. For reference, U.S. presidents cannot serve for more than two elected terms.
After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the highest office became the president of Russia. The Russian president is elected by popular vote to a six-year term, with a term limit of two consecutive terms.
Amendments made in 2020 have exempted Vladimir Putin from being term-limited by excluding his previous terms.
Meanwhile, in China, the General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has functioned as the nation’s most powerful position since the late 1980s. Chosen through internal party processes, the General Secretary serves a five-year term with no limit on reelection. The individual holding this office also becomes China’s president (the head of state), a role once considered more ceremonial.
China’s current president is Xi Jinping who has held the position since 2013. He is serving his third term after constitutional changes in 2018 removed presidential term limits. Under his presidency, China has strengthened its global influence, economy, and centralized governance within the country.
Political leaning affects perceptions of parts of the American economy. Check out Democrats vs Republicans: Opinions on U.S. Industries to see where they diverge.
The post Charted: All U.S., Russian, and Chinese Leaders Since 1975 appeared first on Visual Capitalist.
2025-01-30 02:21:45
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
In December 2024, U.S. annual inflation stood at 2.9%, surpassing the Federal Reserve’s 2% target.
This marked an increase from 2.7% in November, driven by rising costs in key categories like housing and energy.
However, inflation usually varies heavily by location. This graphic visualizes the CPI inflation (change in consumer prices) from December 2023 to December 2024 by U.S. region and select metropolitan areas.
Data comes from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and is updated as of January 2025.
City inflation figures are for their metropolitan statistical area, which is made up of one or more counties that contain a city of 50,000 or more inhabitants.
Region/city | CPI Inflation (Change in consumer prices from December 2023 to December 2024) |
---|---|
Northeast | 3.5% |
Midwest | 3.0% |
South | 2.8% |
West | 2.5% |
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | 3.9% |
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim | 3.4% |
New York-Newark-Jersey City | 4.3% |
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell | 2.6% |
Urban Alaska | 2.3% |
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue | 2.7% |
Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land | 1.0% |
Overall U.S. inflation | 2.9% |
In 2024, inflation varied significantly across U.S. regions, with the Northeast experiencing the highest rate at 3.5% and the West seeing the lowest at 2.5%.
The Northeast, with its higher population density and reliance on imported energy, faced steeper price increases, particularly in housing (5.2%) and utilities (7.1%).
The New York metropolitan area, which includes New York, Newark, and Jersey City, recorded the highest annual CPI inflation out of these major metropolitan areas at 4.3%, 1.4 percentage points higher than the U.S. average.
Similarly to the rest of its region, New Yorkers faced the sharpest year-over-year price jumps in fuels and utilities (10.5%) and housing (6%) compared to December 2023.
Houston recorded the lowest inflation rate among major metro areas at 1.0%, driven primarily by differences in housing costs.
While housing expenses rose 4.1% nationwide since December 2023, they increased by just 0.4% in Houston.
To learn more about economic indicators by U.S. area, check out this graphic that visualizes the 10 states with the lowest real GDP growth in 2023.
The post Mapped: Annual Inflation Rate by U.S. Region appeared first on Visual Capitalist.
2025-01-29 23:41:53
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Globally, the share of low income countries has declined significantly over the past quarter century, dropping from 30.7% in 2000 to just 11.9% today.
China transitioned out of a low income country in 1999 and, by 2010, had achieved upper middle-income status, a position it continues to hold. Similarly, India, which was a low income country two decades ago, has grown into a middle income country driven by rapid economic growth.
This graphic shows countries by gross national income (GNI) per capita, based on data from the World Bank.
For country income classifications, the World Bank used GNI per capita, which includes all income earned by a country’s residents and businesses, both domestically and abroad .
Below, we show how 218 countries worldwide fall into each income category:
Income Group | GNI per Capita 2025 | Global Share of Countries |
---|---|---|
Low income | $1,145 or less | 11.9% |
Lower middle income | $1,146 to $4,515 | 23.4% |
Upper middle income | $4,516 to $14,005 | 25.2% |
High income | $14,005 or more | 39.4% |
For 2025 the classification uses 2023 GNI per capita. Data for Venezuela as of 2021.
Today, 86 countries are considered high income, amounting to 39.4% of the share of countries worldwide.
Since 2000, this share has risen notably from 25.4% of the global total. In Europe, the former Eastern Bloc countries of Hungary, Poland, Czechia, and Slovakia transitioned into high income countries supported by market reforms and income growth.
Meanwhile, Chile and Uruguay ascended to high income status driven by a 2000s commodities boom and rising GDP per capita. Chile stands as the world’s largest copper producer and the second largest producer of lithium.
In Asia, South Korea’s economic rise stemmed from vast exports to China and specialization in key industries. Over the past 25 years, it is among the few countries in the region to overcome the ‘middle-income trap’.
When looking at income classification from a regional perspective, we can see that high income countries are becoming more prevalent across key regions:
Region | Share of High Income Countries | Share of Upper Middle Icome Countries | Share of Lower Middle Income Countries | Share of Low Income Countries | Number of Countries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
North America | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 3 |
Europe & Central Asia | 69.0% | 25.9% | 5.2% | 0.0% | 58 |
Latin America & Caribbean | 42.9% | 47.6% | 9.5% | 0.0% | 42 |
East Asia & Pacific | 42.1% | 23.7% | 31.6% | 2.6% | 38 |
Middle East & North Africa | 38.1% | 19.0% | 33.3% | 9.5% | 21 |
Sub-Saharan Africa | 2.1% | 12.5% | 39.6% | 45.8% | 48 |
South Asia | 0.0% | 12.5% | 75.0% | 12.5% | 8 |
Overall, 42.9% of countries in Latin America and the Caribbean are high income, mostly found across island nations.
In the Middle East, oil-rich nations of Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE have among the highest GDP per capita in the region. Notably, Saudi Arabia emerged as the region’s first trillion-dollar economy fueled by massive oil reserves and government initiatives.
By contrast, Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia have the lowest share of wealthy countries, yet growth in key countries has been promising. In 2024, Sub-Saharan Africa was home to nine of the top 20 fastest-growing economies including Niger, Senegal, and Libya.
To learn more about this topic from a U.S.-based perspective, check out this graphic on GDP per capita by state.
The post Mapped: All of the World’s Countries, by Income Group appeared first on Visual Capitalist.
2025-01-29 21:14:43
This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
The year 2025 marks the start of a new generation: the Betas. This group will include everyone born over the next 15 years.
In this graphic, we compare the current workforce with the projected workforce by 2035, broken down by generation, based on data from McCrindle as of May 2024.
Baby Boomers (ages 61-79), who comprise 20% of the U.S. population and own half of the country’s net wealth, will be virtually out of the workforce by 2035.
Gen Z (ages 16-30) and younger generations are projected to make up half of the workforce within the next 10 years.
Generation | Age Group | Current Workforce Share | Workforce (2035P) |
---|---|---|---|
Boomers | 1946-1964 (age 61-79) | 12% | 0% |
Gen X | 1965-1979 (age 46-60) | 27% | 21% |
Gen Y | 1980-1994 (age 31-45) | 34% | 29% |
Gen Z | 1995-2009 (age 16-30) | 27% | 31% |
Gen Alpha | 2010-2024 (age 15 and younger) | 0% | 19% |
Meanwhile, Generation Alpha (15 and younger) is expected to grow rapidly, reaching 19% of the workforce by 2035. This generation is also projected to surpass Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z in size, with a population of more than 2 billion, making it the largest generation in history.
For this analysis, McCrindle examines the following cohorts, each adhering to a 15-year pattern:
If you enjoyed this topic, check out this graphic that shows the distribution of wealth in the United States from 1990 to 2023 by generation.
The post Charted: How Generations Will Shape the Workforce by 2035 appeared first on Visual Capitalist.