2026-05-15 02:21:07
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Men working full-time in the U.S. still earn significantly more than women on average, but the size of that earnings gap varies dramatically depending on where Americans live and work.
This map uses data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) to compare median annual earnings for male and female full-time workers across all 50 states.
While national conversations often focus on equal pay for equal work, economists point out that broader factors like industry mix, occupational concentration, caregiving patterns, and leadership representation also shape statewide earnings differences.
The table below highlights the states with the widest gender earnings gaps and the economic forces behind them.
| Rank | State | Median earnings gap ($) | Earnings Gap (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Utah | 18,740 | 35.9 |
| 2 | Louisiana | 16,746 | 36.7 |
| 3 | Idaho | 16,147 | 32.2 |
| 4 | Washington | 14,534 | 21.6 |
| 5 | West Virginia | 14,392 | 31.2 |
| 6 | New Jersey | 14,374 | 21.6 |
| 7 | Alabama | 14,301 | 30.4 |
| 8 | North Dakota | 14,013 | 27.1 |
| 9 | New Hampshire | 13,955 | 22.7 |
| 10 | Michigan | 13,739 | 26.2 |
| 11 | District of Columbia | 13,661 | 13.9 |
| 12 | Connecticut | 13,605 | 20.6 |
| 13 | Ohio | 13,524 | 26.1 |
| 14 | Virginia | 12,721 | 20.8 |
| 15 | Wisconsin | 12,518 | 23.5 |
| 16 | Wyoming | 12,317 | 24.6 |
| 17 | Georgia | 12,313 | 23.7 |
| 18 | Iowa | 12,227 | 23.9 |
| 19 | Pennsylvania | 11,939 | 21.4 |
| 20 | Illinois | 11,893 | 20.0 |
| 21 | Colorado | 11,668 | 17.8 |
| 22 | Indiana | 11,257 | 22.0 |
| 23 | Texas | 11,148 | 21.7 |
| 24 | Missouri | 10,927 | 21.6 |
| 25 | Oklahoma | 10,923 | 23.8 |
| 26 | Minnesota | 10,913 | 17.9 |
| 27 | Kansas | 10,962 | 21.5 |
| 28 | Alaska | 10,798 | 17.7 |
| 29 | South Carolina | 10,615 | 21.1 |
| 30 | Montana | 10,589 | 20.9 |
| 31 | South Dakota | 10,558 | 20.8 |
| 32 | Nebraska | 10,452 | 20.3 |
| 33 | Nevada | 10,426 | 20.7 |
| 34 | Tennessee | 10,388 | 20.6 |
| 35 | North Carolina | 10,159 | 19.6 |
| 36 | Arkansas | 10,097 | 22.4 |
| 37 | Oregon | 10,095 | 16.7 |
| 38 | New Mexico | 10,070 | 20.1 |
| 39 | Arizona | 9,969 | 18.7 |
| 40 | Mississippi | 9,914 | 22.7 |
| 41 | Kentucky | 9,888 | 20.1 |
| 42 | Massachusetts | 9,784 | 13.5 |
| 43 | Florida | 9,638 | 19.1 |
| 44 | Maine | 8,712 | 15.5 |
| 45 | California | 8,390 | 13.2 |
| 46 | Maryland | 8,317 | 11.7 |
| 47 | Delaware | 7,985 | 14.0 |
| 48 | Hawaii | 7,608 | 13.8 |
| 49 | New York | 6,228 | 9.5 |
| 50 | Vermont | 6,048 | 9.9 |
The widest earnings gaps are concentrated in the South and Mountain West, while Northeastern and coastal states generally report smaller differences. Louisiana and Utah stand out at opposite ends of the country, but for surprisingly similar structural reasons.
Louisiana consistently ranks among the states with the largest gender earnings gaps. A major reason is the state’s concentration of high-paying energy and petrochemical jobs, sectors that remain heavily male-dominated.
Oil, gas, and industrial employers along the Gulf Coast help drive high median earnings for men, while women working full-time are more concentrated in healthcare, education, and administrative support roles that generally pay less on average.
Utah highlights how fast-growing high-income industries can widen earnings gaps when top-paying technical and leadership roles remain disproportionately male. Women working full-time are also more concentrated in clerical, healthcare-support, retail, and service occupations that typically offer lower pay growth.
Research from organizations like the AAUW and Status of Women Data shows that occupational segregation, where men and women cluster in different industries and job types, remains one of the biggest drivers of wage disparities nationwide.
At the other end of the spectrum, states like New York, Vermont, Maryland, California, and Massachusetts report some of the narrowest earnings gaps in the country.
States with smaller earnings gaps tend to have larger professional-service economies, higher female college attainment, and more women working in higher-paying occupations. At the same time, extraction industries and heavy manufacturing, which often generate very high wages for men, play a smaller role in the local economy.
In many of these states, women are also more represented in higher-paying professional occupations, including law, finance, medicine, and management. While disparities still exist, the earnings gap narrows when women have greater access to sectors tied to overall wage growth.
Importantly, this data measures overall median earnings differences between male and female full-time workers, not unequal pay for the exact same job. Federal law requires equal pay for equal work under many circumstances, including protections enforced by the U.S. Department of Labor.
However, economists and labor researchers point to several broader forces that continue to influence earnings differences. Career interruptions resulting from caregiving responsibilities and unequal representation in leadership positions significantly contribute to the gender earnings gap.
Nonetheless, there are also signs of gradual progress. Younger women now outpace men in college attainment nationally, and the long-term gap has steadily narrowed over time. Expanding access to higher-paying industries and improving representation in leadership roles could help further reduce disparities in the years ahead.
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Countries with the Biggest Gender Disparities in Their Workforces on the Voronoi app.Use This Visualization
2026-05-14 22:11:04
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
The world’s richest countries are not always the most prosperous.
According to the Atlantic Council’s 2026 Prosperity Index, the world’s most prosperous countries tend to combine economic strength with high living standards.
Meanwhile, the U.S. places 38th overall, far below many smaller advanced economies, highlighting the gap between wealth creation and broader quality of life.
Europe dominates the rankings, claiming 30 of the top 40 spots. Norway, Iceland, Denmark, and Sweden all place in the global top five.
With a GDP per capita of $90K, top-ranked Norway benefits from a resource-rich economy in which oil revenues are channeled into its $2.2 trillion sovereign wealth fund. Having doubled in size over the past decade, the fund helps finance public services such as healthcare and education while supporting long-term economic stability.
High-ranking Iceland and Denmark also combine expansive social programs with competitive business environments and high levels of public trust. Along with their smaller populations, these factors can support stronger overall quality-of-life outcomes.
The rankings below measure how effectively countries convert wealth into broader living standards, including healthcare, education, equality, minority well-being, and environmental quality.
| Rank | Country | 2026 Prosperity Index |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
 Norway |
91.6 |
| 2 |
 Iceland |
90.1 |
| 3 |
 Denmark |
90.0 |
| 4 |
 Sweden |
89.4 |
| 5 |
 Ireland |
89.1 |
| 6 |
 Switzerland |
88.9 |
| 7 |
 Belgium |
88.7 |
| 8 |
 Finland |
88.4 |
| 9 |
 Netherlands |
88.1 |
| 10 |
 Slovenia |
87.9 |
| 11 |
 Luxembourg |
87.3 |
| 12 |
 Czechia |
87.2 |
| 13 |
 Germany |
87.1 |
| 14 |
 Australia |
86.7 |
| 15 |
 New Zealand |
85.9 |
| 16 |
 Malta |
85.6 |
| 17 |
 Austria |
85.3 |
| 18 |
 Singapore |
84.7 |
| 19 |
 Cyprus |
84.3 |
| 20 |
 Canada |
84.2 |
| 21 |
 Estonia |
84.2 |
| 22 |
 Spain |
84.0 |
| 23 |
 France |
83.7 |
| 24 |
 Japan |
83.6 |
| 25 |
 Slovakia |
83.5 |
| 26 |
 South Korea |
83.1 |
| 27 |
 Lithuania |
82.8 |
| 28 |
 Taiwan |
82.7 |
| 29 |
 United Kingdom |
82.7 |
| 30 |
 Italy |
82.6 |
| 31 |
 Portugal |
82 |
| 32 |
 Latvia |
81.7 |
| 33 |
 Greece |
81.5 |
| 34 |
 Poland |
80.8 |
| 35 |
 UAE |
80.0 |
| 36 |
 Croatia |
79.9 |
| 37 |
 Israel |
79.9 |
| 38 |
 U.S. |
79.8 |
| 39 |
 Hungary |
79.0 |
| 40 |
 Uruguay |
79.0 |
Notably, Central European economies such as Slovenia (#10) and Czechia (#12) outperform many larger and wealthier peers. Strong performances in equality, healthcare, and education help these countries rank ahead of major economies including Germany (#13) and France (#23).
Their performance suggests that prosperity is shaped not only by national wealth, but also by how evenly resources and opportunities are distributed across society.
Singapore ranks 18th globally, standing out for its high GDP per capita of $93K and strong public infrastructure. It also has one of the highest life expectancies in the world.
Its ranking reflects decades of state-led investment in housing, healthcare, transportation, and education, helping transform Singapore into one of the world’s most efficient and competitive economies.
Overall, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan all rank in the top 30, scoring well economically but often lower than Northern Europe on equality and social indicators. At the same time, aging populations, rising housing costs, and intense work cultures continue to weigh on broader well-being across several advanced Asian economies.
The U.S. ranks 38th overall despite being the world’s largest economy.
The country scores relatively poorly on several quality-of-life indicators, including inequality, environmental performance, and access to opportunity among minority groups. It also ranks 46th globally in life expectancy, the lowest among comparable high-income nations. That gap has continued to widen over time.
The ranking underscores a broader paradox: while the U.S. remains a global leader in innovation, capital markets, and economic output, those advantages have not translated evenly into health outcomes or social mobility.
The 2026 rankings reinforce a growing global reality that economic strength alone no longer guarantees high living standards. Increasingly, the world’s most prosperous countries are those that combine wealth creation with strong institutions, accessible healthcare, social mobility, and sustained investment in citizens’ well-being.
To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on the top 50 economies by GDP in 2026.
2026-05-14 19:44:54
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Despite record renewable deployment, fossil fuels still generated the majority of the world’s electricity in 2025.
This visualization breaks down the global electricity mix by source, showing that coal alone still accounts for roughly one-third of worldwide power generation. Natural gas remains the second-largest source, highlighting how deeply fossil fuels remain embedded in the global energy system.
At the same time, solar and wind continue expanding rapidly and now rival nuclear power in total electricity generation. The data for this visualization comes from Ember, as of 2025.
Coal continues to hold the largest share of global electricity generation at nearly 33%. Much of this demand comes from rapidly industrializing economies where coal remains relatively cheap and widely available. Countries across Asia, particularly China and India, still rely heavily on coal to meet growing electricity needs.
| Rank | Source | Value (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coal | 32.97 |
| 2 | Natural Gas | 21.77 |
| 3 | Hydro | 14.00 |
| 4 | Nuclear | 8.85 |
| 5 | Solar | 8.70 |
| 6 | Wind | 8.50 |
| -- | Other Fossil | 2.65 |
| -- | Other Renewables | 2.50 |
Natural gas is the second-largest source, accounting for nearly 22% of global generation. Gas-fired plants are often viewed as a flexible backup for renewable energy because they can ramp production up or down quickly.
However, fossil fuels combined still represent close to 57% of worldwide electricity generation.
Solar and wind are now nearly tied in their contribution to global electricity generation, each supplying roughly 8%–9% of total power.
Solar in particular has seen explosive growth over the last decade due to falling panel costs and large-scale installations in China, Europe, and the U.S.
Wind energy has also expanded significantly, especially offshore wind projects in Europe and Asia. Together, solar and wind now produce more electricity globally than nuclear power or hydro.
Hydropower remains the largest low-carbon electricity source globally, contributing 14% of total generation. Many countries rely on hydroelectric dams for stable, dispatchable electricity that can complement intermittent renewable sources like solar and wind.
Meanwhile, nuclear power accounts for nearly 9% of global electricity production. Although nuclear growth has been slower in recent years, several countries are investing in next-generation reactors and extending the life of existing plants.
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Mapped: The Average Cost of Electricity by U.S. State on Voronoi.
2026-05-14 02:26:01
See more visualizations like this on the Voronoi app.
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Young Americans earn far more in some states than others.
Using the latest U.S. Census Bureau data, this map shows the median household income for Americans ages 25–44 across all 50 states and Washington, D.C.
Massachusetts ranks first at $123.2K, followed closely by Washington, D.C. and New Jersey. At the other end, Mississippi ranks last at $66K, meaning young households in Massachusetts earn about 87% more.
But higher income does not always mean greater financial comfort. Many of the highest-earning states also have some of the country’s steepest housing and living costs.
The top 10 states show a clear pattern: young households tend to earn the most in places with large metro economies, high education levels, and concentrations of high-wage industries.
| Rank | State | Median Household Income 2024 (Ages 25-44) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Massachusetts | $123,206 |
| 2 | District of Columbia | $122,917 |
| 3 | New Jersey | $118,481 |
| 4 | New Hampshire | $114,924 |
| 5 | Washington | $112,374 |
| 6 | California | $110,732 |
| 7 | Colorado | $109,174 |
| 8 | Maryland | $108,041 |
| 9 | Connecticut | $105,621 |
| 10 | Utah | $101,756 |
| 11 | New York | $101,393 |
| 12 | Minnesota | $101,311 |
| 13 | Virginia | $101,267 |
| 14 | Alaska | $101,155 |
| 15 | Hawaii | $101,085 |
| 16 | Oregon | $98,287 |
| 17 | Vermont | $97,695 |
| 18 | Delaware | $96,154 |
| 19 | Rhode Island | $95,063 |
| 20 | Maine | $93,626 |
| 21 | Illinois | $92,743 |
| 22 | North Dakota | $92,180 |
| 23 | Idaho | $92,066 |
| 24 | Arizona | $91,212 |
| 25 | Wisconsin | $91,202 |
| 26 | Pennsylvania | $90,401 |
| 27 | Nebraska | $88,672 |
| 28 | Montana | $88,441 |
| 29 | Nevada | $87,394 |
| 30 | Kansas | $87,035 |
| 31 | Georgia | $86,411 |
| 32 | Florida | $85,890 |
| 33 | Iowa | $85,436 |
| 34 | Texas | $85,373 |
| 35 | North Carolina | $84,527 |
| 36 | Wyoming | $84,372 |
| 37 | South Dakota | $84,351 |
| 38 | Missouri | $82,996 |
| 39 | Ohio | $82,241 |
| 40 | Michigan | $82,236 |
| 41 | South Carolina | $82,010 |
| 42 | Tennessee | $81,377 |
| 43 | Indiana | $80,602 |
| 44 | Kentucky | $77,680 |
| 45 | Alabama | $75,634 |
| 46 | New Mexico | $75,190 |
| 47 | Oklahoma | $74,976 |
| 48 | West Virginia | $73,003 |
| 49 | Arkansas | $71,747 |
| 50 | Louisiana | $70,700 |
| 51 | Mississippi | $65,978 |
| -- |
U.S. State Average |
$91,928 |
In Massachusetts, the median household income for Americans ages 25–44 is $123.2K, likely driven by its highly educated workforce. Washington, D.C. also ranks near the top at $122.9K, alongside Washington ($112.4K) and California ($110.7K).
Overall, eight of the top 10 states are located on either the East or West Coast. Mountain West states like Colorado ($109.2K) and Utah ($101.8K) also rank highly, reflecting the growth of tech, professional services, and other high-wage industries.
At the other end of the spectrum, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, and West Virginia report the country’s lowest median incomes for young households, all below $72K. These states generally have lower concentrations of high-wage industries and lower rates of bachelor’s degree attainment.
But higher incomes do not always translate into greater financial comfort.
Several of the top-ranked states, including Massachusetts, California, and New Jersey, also have some of America’s highest housing costs. In many large coastal metros, rising rents, childcare expenses, and home prices absorb a substantial share of household earnings.
While Massachusetts households earn the most, a median family of four retains just 16% of its paycheck after major expenses, compared to the U.S. average of 24.7%. By comparison, households in states such as Iowa and South Dakota keep roughly 35%.
That dynamic helps explain why many younger Americans continue relocating to lower-cost states in the South and Mountain West, even if salaries are lower on paper. Ultimately, the best-paying states are not always the easiest places to get ahead. For many young households, the question is whether higher salaries are enough to offset housing, childcare, and everyday costs.
To learn more about this topic, check out this graphic on where wealth is moving in America.
2026-05-13 23:43:00
Fraud continues to evolve across the global economy. Criminal networks now move faster, scale wider, and exploit digital systems more effectively than ever before. Businesses face rising pressure from identity theft, cybercrime, financial scams, and other organized crimes. At the same time, countries differ sharply in their ability to prevent and respond to these threats.
This visualization, created in partnership with Inigo, shows how 112 countries rank based on their vulnerability to cybersecurity risks in 2025.
Sumsub built the index using four key factors: fraud activity, resource accessibility, government intervention, and economic health. Lower scores indicate stronger resilience against fraud, while higher scores signal greater exposure to risk.
European countries lead the global rankings for cybersecurity resilience. Luxembourg ranks first overall with a fraud index score of 0.8. Denmark, Finland, Norway, and the Netherlands round out the top five. Switzerland, Sweden, and Austria also perform strongly.
| Rank | Country | Fraud Index 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Luxembourg |
0.8 |
| 2 |
Denmark |
0.9 |
| 3 |
Finland |
1.0 |
| 4 |
Norway |
1.1 |
| 5 |
Netherlands |
1.1 |
| 6 |
Switzerland |
1.2 |
| 7 |
New Zealand |
1.2 |
| 8 |
Sweden |
1.2 |
| 9 |
Austria |
1.2 |
| 10 |
Singapore |
1.4 |
| 11 |
Slovenia |
1.4 |
| 12 |
Israel |
1.4 |
| 13 |
Malta |
1.4 |
| 14 |
Lithuania |
1.4 |
| 15 |
Australia |
1.4 |
| 16 |
Ireland |
1.5 |
| 17 |
Czechia (Czech Republic) |
1.5 |
| 18 |
Canada |
1.6 |
| 19 |
 Qatar |
1.6 |
| 20 |
Slovakia |
1.6 |
| 21 |
Belgium |
1.7 |
| 22 |
 Mauritius |
1.8 |
| 23 |
Greece |
1.8 |
| 24 |
Cyprus |
1.8 |
| 25 |
Hungary |
1.8 |
| 26 |
 Saudi Arabia |
1.9 |
| 27 |
South Korea |
1.9 |
| 28 |
Japan |
2.0 |
| 29 |
Portugal |
2.0 |
| 30 |
Uruguay |
2.0 |
| 31 |
United Arab Emirates |
2.0 |
| 32 |
 Chile |
2.0 |
| 33 |
 Thailand |
2.0 |
| 34 |
 Serbia |
2.1 |
| 35 |
 Peru |
2.1 |
| 36 |
 Kazakhstan |
2.1 |
| 37 |
Spain |
2.2 |
| 38 |
Germany |
2.2 |
| 39 |
 Panama |
2.2 |
| 40 |
 North Macedonia |
2.2 |
| 41 |
 Kuwait |
2.2 |
| 42 |
Iceland |
2.2 |
| 43 |
Estonia |
2.2 |
| 44 |
Italy |
2.3 |
| 45 |
France |
2.3 |
| 46 |
 Botswana |
2.3 |
| 47 |
United Kingdom |
2.3 |
| 48 |
 Albania |
2.3 |
| 49 |
 Bahrain |
2.4 |
| 50 |
 Morocco |
2.4 |
| 51 |
 Georgia |
2.4 |
| 52 |
 El Salvador |
2.4 |
| 53 |
 Jamaica |
2.4 |
| 54 |
 Trinidad and Tobago |
2.4 |
| 55 |
 Costa Rica |
2.5 |
| 56 |
 Jordan |
2.5 |
| 57 |
Poland |
2.5 |
| 58 |
 Kyrgyzstan |
2.5 |
| 59 |
 Moldova |
2.5 |
| 60 |
 Paraguay |
2.6 |
| 61 |
 Bahamas |
2.6 |
| 62 |
 Guatemala |
2.6 |
| 63 |
 Turkey |
2.6 |
| 64 |
 Barbados |
2.7 |
| 65 |
 Romania |
2.7 |
| 66 |
 Bolivia |
2.7 |
| 67 |
 Tunisia |
2.8 |
| 68 |
 Ecuador |
2.8 |
| 69 |
Taiwan |
2.8 |
| 70 |
 Mexico |
2.8 |
| 71 |
Latvia |
2.8 |
| 72 |
 Fiji |
2.8 |
| 73 |
 Mongolia |
2.9 |
| 74 |
 South Africa |
2.9 |
| 75 |
 Maldives |
3.1 |
| 76 |
 Hong Kong |
3.1 |
| 77 |
 Dominican Republic |
3.1 |
| 78 |
 Nicaragua |
3.2 |
| 79 |
 Egypt |
3.2 |
| 80 |
 Bosnia and Herzegovina |
3.2 |
| 81 |
 Belarus |
3.3 |
| 82 |
 Honduras |
3.3 |
| 83 |
 Uzbekistan |
3.4 |
| 84 |
 Philippines |
3.4 |
| 85 |
 Cambodia |
3.4 |
| 86 |
 Malaysia |
3.5 |
| 87 |
 Guyana |
3.6 |
| 88 |
 Ghana |
3.6 |
| 89 |
 Ukraine |
3.7 |
| 90 |
 Algeria |
3.7 |
| 91 |
United States of America |
3.8 |
| 92 |
 Zimbabwe |
3.8 |
| 93 |
 Lebanon |
4.0 |
| 94 |
 Senegal |
4.0 |
| 95 |
 Argentina |
4.1 |
| 96 |
 China |
4.1 |
| 97 |
 Vietnam |
4.2 |
| 98 |
 Colombia |
4.2 |
| 99 |
 Kenya |
4.3 |
| 100 |
 Armenia |
4.3 |
| 101 |
 Brazil |
4.4 |
| 102 |
 Ethiopia |
4.4 |
| 103 |
 Sri Lanka |
4.8 |
| 104 |
 Azerbaijan |
4.9 |
| 105 |
 Rwanda |
4.9 |
| 106 |
 Bangladesh |
5.3 |
| 107 |
 Uganda |
5.4 |
| 108 |
 Tanzania |
5.5 |
| 109 |
 India |
6.2 |
| 110 |
 Nigeria |
6.4 |
| 111 |
 Indonesia |
6.5 |
| 112 |
 Pakistan |
7.5 |
Several Asia-Pacific economies rank near the top as well. Singapore places 10th globally, while Australia ranks 15th and Canada ranks 18th. These countries benefit from strong institutions, stable economies, and tighter regulatory oversight.
The rankings also reveal broad regional gaps. Many lower-ranked countries struggle with weaker enforcement systems, limited digital protections, or economic instability. These conditions create more opportunities for fraudulent activity to spread.
The United States ranks 91st out of 112 countries with a fraud index score of 3.8. That places the country in the bottom 20% globally. China ranks even lower at 96th, while Vietnam places 97th overall.
The findings highlight how cybersecurity risk now affects both emerging and advanced economies. As digital systems expand, businesses must strengthen fraud prevention strategies across every market they operate in.
Cybersecurity risks continue to shift across industries, technologies, and borders. Understanding the data helps businesses identify vulnerabilities before threats escalate. By tracking global fraud patterns and preparedness levels, organizations can make smarter decisions and build stronger defenses against emerging risks.
Explore a data-driven view of risk.
The global footprint of U.S. troops remains extensive with deployments concentrated across a small group of strategic host countries.
Global perceptions of trust in the United States are shifting, reflecting a broader reassessment of alliances in a more uncertain world.
Across the U.S., the ground beneath many major cities is gradually subsiding. 25 out of America’s 28 largest cities are slowly sinking.
Wildfires in the United States are becoming more destructive, with many of the most severe seasons occurring in the past decade.
As housing spreads into the fire line, exposure is rising sharply, compounding loss potential and challenging long-term insurability.
Rising labor and material costs mean every insured dollar now rebuilds less, widening the recovery gap after disasters across the United States.
Lower interest rates have often supported stronger real estate returns and improved valuations. Will that trend return in 2026?
From climate volatility to economic and technological shifts, a wide range of forces are reshaping property risk in the U.S.
Hurricanes are a defining force in the U.S. climate, capable of leaving behind profound environmental, social, and economic devastation.
Global temperatures are climbing—but how is this trend playing out across the United States, and which regions are being hit the hardest?
Wildfire events are growing increasingly frequent and destructive around the world as human-driven climate impacts continue to escalate.
Drought grips much of the U.S., affecting over 60 million people today.
Weight loss drugs have surged in popularity in recent years, transforming the pharmaceutical landscape. Which brands are dominating this space?
The pharmaceutical industry has made enormous strides in treating—and even curing—a wide range of diseases and conditions. Which areas are seeing the most R&D in 2025?
Pharma giants don’t just make medicine—they shape the future of healthcare. Who are the world’s major players?
The fraud and financial crime landscapes are evolving rapidly. What are the key threats shaping risk in 2025?
Some of the largest digital heists didn’t rely on brute-force hacking, they exploited the weakest link in security: human trust.
As cybersecurity threats escalate, which financial crimes are causing the most harm? The FBI has the data.
Suspicious activity has been rising in the U.S., but is it spread evenly throughout all 50 states? Certainly not.
As technology and AI become more widespread, fraud and other suspicious activity are rising across America. Which types are the most common?
From money laundering to fraud, financial crime acts as a drain on the economy, totaling an incredible $3.1 trillion.
Over half the global population is ruled by non-centrist types of government, including autocracies and left or right wing parties.
Ukraine will require an estimated $524B over the next decade to recover from the Russia-Ukraine war. Which sectors have been most impacted?
Amid tariff increases, consumers’ expectations for U.S. inflation in the next five years have reached their highest level since March 1991.
In his first 100 days, President Trump has issued far more executive orders than any other president in history.
2026-05-13 22:17:32
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
The global economic order has shifted dramatically over the last decade, with countries reshuffling positions amid inflation shocks, geopolitical tensions, pandemic disruptions, and the rapid rise of AI-driven industries.
This graphic compares the world’s 15 largest economies in 2016 and 2026 using IMF World Economic Outlook data, revealing which countries gained ground, which fell behind, and which surprised the most.
The U.S. remains the world’s largest economy at $32.4 trillion in 2026 forecasts, while China crossed the $20 trillion mark. India posted one of the fastest growth rates among major economies, while Japan became the only G20 economy to shrink over the decade.
The period from 2016 to 2026 saw major reordering among the world’s top economies, with Mexico overtaking Spain, India overtaking France, and Russia leapfrogging both Brazil and Canada.
The table below lists the world’s 15 largest economies in both 2016 and 2026 based on their nominal GDP in billions of U.S. dollars.
| Rank | Country | 2016 GDP (billions, USD) | 2026 GDP (billions, USD) | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
USA |
18,805 | 32,384 | 72 |
| 2 |
China |
11,452 | 20,852 | 82 |
| 3 |
Germany |
3,536 | 5,453 | 54 |
| 4 |
Japan |
5,110 | 4,379 | -14 |
| 5 |
UK |
2,717 | 4,265 | 57 |
| 6 |
India |
2,265 | 4,153 | 83 |
| 7 |
France |
2,470 | 3,596 | 46 |
| 8 |
Italy |
1,887 | 2,738 | 45 |
| 9 |
 Russia |
1,281 | 2,656 | 107 |
| 10 |
Brazil |
1,797 | 2,636 | 47 |
| 11 |
Canada |
1,528 | 2,507 | 64 |
| 12 |
Australia |
1,268 | 2,124 | 68 |
| 13 |
Mexico |
1,112 | 2,121 | 91 |
| 14 |
Spain |
1,243 | 2,091 | 68 |
| 15 |
South Korea |
1,579 | 1,931 | 22 |
One of the biggest shifts in the rankings came from India, whose economy expanded by 83% between 2016 and 2026. By the end of the period, India’s GDP had nearly caught up with both Japan and Germany.
Meanwhile, Germany overtook Japan to become the world’s third-largest economy, despite relatively modest growth compared to emerging markets.
Germany’s growth was modest compared to emerging markets like China, India, and Mexico, and was tempered in part by the economic slowdown it faced throughout the post-COVID era. However, Germany still grew faster than other major European Union economies like France (46%) and Italy (45%), though not Spain (68%).
The decade between 2016 and 2026 also saw the European Union lose its second-largest member economy, the United Kingdom, in 2020. The UK grew its GDP by 57% to reach $4.3 trillion by 2026.
Every major world economy expanded over the last decade, with one notable exception. Japan’s GDP shrank from $5.1 trillion in 2016 to $4.4 trillion in 2026, reflecting a 14% contraction.
Following decades of rapid economic expansion in the late 20th century, Japan’s economy has struggled since the 1990s. The government has accumulated a debt-to-GDP ratio of over 200%, while major exporters in the auto and tech sectors have faced rising competition and trade tensions involving both the U.S. and China.
Perhaps Japan’s most pressing challenge is its demographic crisis. The country’s population was roughly 5 million larger in 2016 than in 2026, reflecting a decades-long fertility decline that threatens future growth prospects.
Russia’s economy more than doubled in size between 2016 and 2026, growing by 107% to reach $2.7 trillion based on IMF forecasts. This expansion came after the Russian financial crisis of 2014–2016, which was driven largely by falling oil prices.
Russia’s growth, fueled heavily by oil and gas exports, came despite sanctions imposed after the country’s occupation of Crimea in 2014 and full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
Even as the U.S. and European Union imposed sanctions, Russian energy exports were rerouted toward buyers in China and India, albeit at discounted prices.
How do these countries and economic powers compare with individual U.S. states? Find out with The 50 Largest Economies, Including U.S. States on Voronoi.Use This Visualization
