2026-03-02 06:25:45

This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
What began in March 2011 as pro-democracy protests against President Bashar al-Assad’s government spiraled into one of the most brutal conflicts of the 21st century, drawing in regional and global powers and resulting in immense human suffering. Over more than a decade of war, hundreds of thousands of people lost their lives, and millions were forced from their homes.
These charts from Our World in Data and sourced from the UN, Eurostat, the IMF, World Bank and others show the many costs of conflict — from fatalities to economic collapse and rising poverty.
Here’s a detailed look at the data behind the war’s impacts:
| Category (Syria) | Initial Data (2004) | Peak Data Point | Most Recent Data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deaths due to fighting | ~0 | 79,000 | 3,600 |
| Deaths from all causes | 73,000 | 160,000 | 120,000 |
| Deaths of children under 5 | 11,000 | 23,000 | 10,000 |
| Internally displaced people | ~0 | 7.6 million | 7.3 million |
| International refugees | 22,000 | 6.9 million | 6.4 million |
| GDP per capita | $9,500 | $9,600 | $4,200 |
| Share in extreme poverty | 0.50% | 17% | 17% |
| Share undernourished | 6.50% | 34% | 34% |
The data illustrate several harsh realities: annual deaths from fighting spiked after 2011 with devastating loss of life, including among children, while total deaths from all causes rose. Millions of Syrians became internally displaced or refugees, GDP per capita plunged, and extreme poverty and undernourishment grew sharply.
The conflict began during the Arab Spring when peaceful protests were met with force by government security services. What followed was a fragmented civil war involving government forces, opposition groups, Kurdish militias, extremist factions, and international actors; including Russia, Iran, the U.S., Turkey, and others.
At its peak, organized violence devastated cities like Aleppo, Homs and Raqqa, and fracturing Syrian society. Hundreds of thousands were killed across combatants and civilians, and millions more were displaced internally and abroad, which remade the country’s demographics and burdened neighboring states.
The war’s impacts extend far beyond immediate conflict deaths. GDP per capita more than halved as economic activity collapsed amid destruction of infrastructure and displacement of workers. Extreme poverty (once rare in Syria) surged, while undernourishment became widespread.
This aligns with broader findings that violence imposes costs on societies far beyond direct combat, from lost productivity to health crises and long-term poverty.
Though large-scale warfare has diminished, Syria faces a fragile transition. Recent agreements between the central government and Kurdish forces aim to stabilize parts of the country, but humanitarian needs remain acute. Millions still depend on aid, and access to essential services is uneven.
Political fragmentation, economic collapse, and reconstruction needs—estimated in the hundreds of billions—mean recovery will be lengthy and uncertain, even as some areas see renewed governance and investment.
2026-03-02 02:43:00
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
In just a few decades, European empires redrew the map of Africa.
In the span of roughly 40 years, European powers had carved up nearly the entire continent, transforming Africa into a patchwork of colonial territories administered from London, Paris, Berlin, Brussels, Lisbon, Rome, and Madrid.
This map captures that moment at its peak, on the eve of World War I, when imperial control stretched across almost the whole continent before the war began to unravel Europe’s overseas empires.
Many of Africa’s modern national borders trace directly back to this period, reflecting colonial-era agreements rather than preexisting cultural or political boundaries.
Data used here leverages diverse sources including UNESCO (1990), Eric Hobsbawm (1987), Henk Wesseling (1997), EBSCO (2023), and the Library of Congress.
European empires had been making incursions into Africa for centuries, as seen through the Dutch settlers who arrived in the Cape of Good Hope in 1652 and Napoleon Bonaparte’s Egyptian expedition in 1798.
However, the era of New Imperialism which began in the second half of the 19th century saw significantly more complex colonial efforts by the European great powers, especially the British, French, and Germans.
The “Scramble for Africa” saw these three great powers partition the African continent amongst themselves, with the process perhaps best represented by the 1885 Berlin Conference.
Some of the active colonial powers, such as Belgium or Portugal, were smaller countries without extensive military power, while some European great powers like Russia and Austria-Hungary did not participate in the Scramble for Africa.
The British Empire was the most successful of the European empires in Africa, ruling over nearly uninterrupted lands across the eastern half of the continent.
London’s dreams of a Cape to Cairo railway linking their dominions in Egypt and South Africa were dashed by geographic and political concerns, as the eastern Belgian Congo was inhospitable for railway construction while German East Africa was a possession of the leading British rival of the era.
Following the end of the Great War, the British would take control of the latter territory, in what is today the country of Tanzania, although economic concerns during the Great Depression led to the dreamed railway never coming to fruition.
While the British were dominant in eastern Africa, the Maghreb and much of West Africa fell under French control. There were of course nuances between cases: Algeria was annexed to the territory of metropolitan France, while Morocco and Tunisia were each protectorates ruled by leaders loyal to the French Empire.
Nor did Morocco remain solely French-administered, as a 1912 treaty gave Spain dominion over northern parts of the country, near the Straits of Gibraltar, as well as a southern component bordering its Spanish Sahara colony.
By this point in history, Spain, much like neighboring Portugal, was holding on to its final few colonies following major losses of control in the Americas in the preceding decades. The two Iberian countries’ lack of involvement in the world wars led to them keeping their African colonies longer than most other European states, with independence and decolonization only coming in the 1960s-1970s.
Owing to great-power ambivalence over the Congo Basin, Belgium’s King Leopold was able to establish a single vast colony, far larger than his own country, over which to rule. Belgian Congo, with its vast rubber extraction, has been cited as one of the most brutal and damaging colonies within the continent.
Meanwhile, further north only two countries managed to avoid colonization during the Partition of Africa: Ethiopia and Liberia.
The former, also known as Abyssinia, successfully repelled Italian colonization during the prewar partition, although it was eventually occupied by Fascist Italy during the interwar period. Liberia, meanwhile, was founded by freed U.S. slaves and was never colonized, helping it become Africa’s longest-lasting independent state today.
Is there any correlation between Roman emperors’ life spans and currency debasement? To learn more, check out this visualization on Voronoi.
2026-03-01 23:42:08
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
Tourism is a major global industry, projected to contribute $11.7 trillion to global GDP in 2025, or roughly 10% of total economic output. But its importance varies dramatically by country.
For some nations, tourism is a supplementary source of income. For others, it represents the central pillar of economic activity.
The chart above ranks countries by tourism’s share of GDP, using international tourism receipts from UN Tourism and GDP data from the IMF.
Macao tops the list. Visitor spending totaled $32.4 billion, equal to 70.8% of its $45.8 billion economy.
Aruba follows at 69.7%, while the Maldives (68.1%) and Andorra (66.5%) also derive roughly two-thirds of their economic output from tourism. Saint Lucia ranks fifth, with tourism accounting for 53.8% of GDP.
| Rank | Country | Tourism Share of GDP (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Macao |
70.8 |
| 2 |
Aruba |
69.7 |
| 3 |
Maldives |
68.1 |
| 4 |
Andorra |
66.5 |
| 5 |
Saint Lucia |
53.8 |
| 6 |
Grenada |
48.1 |
| 7 |
Antigua and Barbuda |
47.8 |
| 8 |
Seychelles |
46.6 |
| 9 |
Bahamas |
35.0 |
| 10 |
Saint Kitts and Nevis |
32.9 |
| 11 |
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
26.9 |
| 12 |
Malta |
26.4 |
| 13 |
Belize |
25.5 |
| 14 |
Cabo Verde |
23.8 |
| 15 |
Lebanon |
23.6 |
| 16 |
Albania |
21.9 |
| 17 |
Fiji |
21.5 |
| 18 |
Samoa |
19.8 |
| 19 |
Montenegro |
19.8 |
| 20 |
Jamaica |
19.7 |
| 21 |
Gambia |
19.0 |
| 22 |
Tuvalu |
18.6 |
| 23 |
Croatia |
17.9 |
| 24 |
Jordan |
16.9 |
| 25 |
Dominica |
16.8 |
| 26 |
Mauritius |
15.4 |
| 27 |
Barbados |
14.8 |
| 28 |
Georgia |
14.5 |
| 29 |
San Marino |
14.3 |
| 30 |
Portugal |
11.5 |
| 31 |
Tonga |
11.2 |
| 32 |
El Salvador |
11.1 |
| 33 |
Cyprus |
10.8 |
| 34 |
Qatar |
10.7 |
| 35 |
Panama |
10.5 |
| 36 |
Armenia |
10.5 |
| 37 |
Micronesia |
10.3 |
| 38 |
Greece |
10.1 |
| 39 |
Iceland |
9.7 |
| 40 |
Bahrain |
9.0 |
| 41 |
Thailand |
8.8 |
| 42 |
Dominican Republic |
8.8 |
| 43 |
Sao Tome and Principe |
8.7 |
| 44 |
Cambodia |
8.5 |
| 45 |
Morocco |
8.3 |
| 46 |
United Arab Emirates |
8.2 |
| 47 |
Luxembourg |
7.2 |
| 48 |
Laos |
7.0 |
| 49 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
6.8 |
| 50 |
Kyrgyzstan |
6.7 |
| 51 |
Tunisia |
6.7 |
| 52 |
Comoros |
6.4 |
| 53 |
Bhutan |
6.4 |
| 54 |
Spain |
6.2 |
| 55 |
Palau |
6.1 |
| 56 |
Costa Rica |
5.9 |
| 57 |
Malaysia |
5.8 |
| 58 |
Türkiye |
5.8 |
| 59 |
Austria |
5.6 |
| 60 |
Hong Kong |
5.5 |
| 61 |
Estonia |
5.5 |
| 62 |
Moldova |
5.1 |
| 63 |
Slovenia |
5.0 |
| 64 |
Rwanda |
5.0 |
| 65 |
Hungary |
4.9 |
| 66 |
Egypt |
4.5 |
| 67 |
Vanuatu |
4.4 |
| 68 |
Singapore |
4.4 |
| 69 |
Tanzania |
4.3 |
| 70 |
Serbia |
4.3 |
| 71 |
Bulgaria |
4.2 |
| 72 |
North Macedonia |
3.8 |
| 73 |
Saudi Arabia |
3.7 |
| 74 |
New Zealand |
3.7 |
| 75 |
Oman |
3.5 |
| 76 |
South Sudan |
3.3 |
| 77 |
Myanmar |
3.3 |
| 78 |
Namibia |
3.3 |
| 79 |
Azerbaijan |
3.3 |
| 80 |
Ireland |
3.2 |
| 81 |
Sudan |
3.2 |
| 82 |
Timor-Leste |
3.2 |
| 83 |
Ethiopia |
3.1 |
| 84 |
Mongolia |
3.1 |
| 85 |
Solomon Islands |
3.1 |
| 86 |
Latvia |
3.1 |
| 87 |
Uzbekistan |
3.1 |
| 88 |
Australia |
3.0 |
| 89 |
Trinidad and Tobago |
2.9 |
| 90 |
Puerto Rico |
2.9 |
| 91 |
Zambia |
2.9 |
| 92 |
Czechia |
2.9 |
| 93 |
Uruguay |
2.8 |
| 94 |
Sri Lanka |
2.8 |
| 95 |
Switzerland |
2.8 |
| 96 |
France |
2.7 |
| 97 |
Denmark |
2.7 |
| 98 |
Madagascar |
2.6 |
| 99 |
Nicaragua |
2.6 |
| 100 |
Italy |
2.6 |
| 101 |
Uganda |
2.5 |
| 102 |
Philippines |
2.4 |
| 103 |
Colombia |
2.4 |
| 104 |
Guyana |
2.4 |
| 105 |
United Kingdom |
2.3 |
| 106 |
Lithuania |
2.3 |
| 107 |
Canada |
2.2 |
| 108 |
Eritrea |
2.2 |
| 109 |
Senegal |
2.1 |
| 110 |
Togo |
2.0 |
| 111 |
Botswana |
2.0 |
| 112 |
Finland |
2.0 |
| 113 |
Nepal |
2.0 |
| 114 |
Honduras |
2.0 |
| 115 |
Mexico |
2.0 |
| 116 |
Brunei Darussalam |
1.9 |
| 117 |
Bolivia |
1.9 |
| 118 |
Netherlands |
1.9 |
| 119 |
Norway |
1.9 |
| 120 |
Poland |
1.8 |
| 121 |
Kuwait |
1.8 |
| 122 |
Sweden |
1.8 |
| 123 |
Paraguay |
1.8 |
| 124 |
Iraq |
1.7 |
| 125 |
South Africa |
1.7 |
| 126 |
Peru |
1.6 |
| 127 |
Kenya |
1.6 |
| 128 |
Romania |
1.6 |
| 129 |
Belgium |
1.6 |
| 130 |
Ghana |
1.5 |
| 131 |
Iran |
1.5 |
| 132 |
Guatemala |
1.5 |
| 133 |
Japan |
1.5 |
| 134 |
Ecuador |
1.4 |
| 135 |
Chile |
1.4 |
| 136 |
Slovakia |
1.3 |
| 137 |
Benin |
1.3 |
| 138 |
Indonesia |
1.3 |
| 139 |
Central African Republic |
1.2 |
| 140 |
Djibouti |
1.2 |
| 141 |
Mozambique |
1.2 |
| 142 |
South Korea |
1.2 |
| 143 |
Guinea-Bissau |
1.2 |
| 144 |
Cameroon |
1.0 |
| 145 |
Burkina Faso |
1.0 |
| 146 |
Belarus |
1.0 |
| 147 |
Kazakhstan |
1.0 |
| 148 |
Palestine |
1.0 |
| 149 |
India |
0.9 |
| 150 |
Suriname |
0.9 |
| 151 |
United States |
0.9 |
| 152 |
Germany |
0.9 |
| 153 |
Chad |
0.9 |
| 154 |
Argentina |
0.8 |
| 155 |
Equatorial Guinea |
0.8 |
| 156 |
Mali |
0.8 |
| 157 |
Kiribati |
0.7 |
| 158 |
Tajikistan |
0.6 |
| 159 |
Ukraine |
0.6 |
| 160 |
Nauru |
0.6 |
| 161 |
Niger |
0.6 |
| 162 |
Haiti |
0.5 |
| 163 |
Côte d’Ivoire |
0.5 |
| 164 |
Eswatini |
0.5 |
| 165 |
Venezuela |
0.5 |
| 166 |
Israel |
0.5 |
| 167 |
Taiwan |
0.4 |
| 168 |
Lesotho |
0.4 |
| 169 |
Russia |
0.4 |
| 170 |
Afghanistan |
0.4 |
| 171 |
Yemen |
0.4 |
| 172 |
Zimbabwe |
0.4 |
| 173 |
Brazil |
0.3 |
| 174 |
DRC |
0.3 |
| 175 |
Pakistan |
0.3 |
| 176 |
Sierra Leone |
0.3 |
| 177 |
Marshall Islands |
0.2 |
| 178 |
Malawi |
0.2 |
| 179 |
China |
0.2 |
| 180 |
Gabon |
0.2 |
| 181 |
Libya |
0.2 |
| 182 |
Nigeria |
0.1 |
| 183 |
Liberia |
0.1 |
| 184 |
Bangladesh |
0.1 |
| 185 |
Algeria |
0.1 |
| 186 |
Congo |
0.1 |
| 187 |
Burundi |
0.1 |
| 188 |
Mauritania |
0.1 |
| 189 |
Vietnam |
0.0 |
| 190 |
Angola |
0.0 |
| 191 |
Guinea |
0.0 |
| 192 |
Papua New Guinea |
0.0 |
The broader pattern is clear: small island nations and resort-driven economies dominate the upper ranks. Limited domestic markets and fewer large-scale industries often make international visitors a primary source of foreign exchange and employment.
The U.S. ranks 151 on the list, and international tourism accounts for just 0.86% of its GDP despite receipts totaling $251.6 billion in absolute terms.
The country least reliant on tourism is Papua New Guinea, where tourism is responsible for just 0.01% of its economic output. Guinea and Angola trail closely behind at 0.02% of their respective $24.2 billion and $115.2 billion GDPs.
For 47 countries in the data set, tourism generated below 1% of their GDP.
Clusters with higher reliance are also visible around Central America, Eastern Europe and Southeast Asia, which are backpacking hotspots. These countries are considered affordable destinations.
While economic benefits are well documented, tourism-heavy economies are at particular risk to global shocks. Aruba’s real GDP, for instance, contracted 24% in 2020 when the pandemic grounded tourism to a halt, pushing business owners and citizens into economic precarity. It has since rebounded.
On the other hand, over-tourism can overwhelm locals and cause tension on the ground.
To learn more about tourism, check out this graphic which charts where tourists outnumber locals.
2026-03-01 20:21:57
See visuals like this from many other data creators on our Voronoi app. Download it for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
New York City is the largest city in the U.S., and home to immigrants from nearly every corner of the globe. But which country has the largest presence in your neighborhood?
This map reveals the top country of origin for foreign-born residents in all 211 NYC neighborhoods, using data from the Population FactFinder hosted by the city’s Department of City Planning
While China leads the most neighborhoods overall, the Dominican Republic is the largest immigrant group citywide. The result is a clear contrast between geographic spread and total population dominance.
China is the top overseas birthplace for immigrants in 56 neighborhoods across New York, making it the most widespread of the immigrant groups in the city today.
The data table below shows the largest immigrant group of every major neighborhood in New York:
| Neighborhood Name | Largest Immigrant Group |
|---|---|
| Elmhurst |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Jackson Heights |
Colombia |
| Bensonhurst |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| South Ozone Park |
Guyana |
| Flushing-Willets Point |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Forest Hills |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Corona |
Ecuador |
| Canarsie |
Jamaica |
| Washington Heights (South) |
Dominican Republic |
| Jamaica |
Bangladesh |
| Murray Hill-Broadway Flushing |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Sheepshead Bay-Manhattan Beach-Gerritsen Beach |
Ukraine |
| Washington Heights (North) |
Dominican Republic |
| Gravesend (West) |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Ridgewood |
Ecuador |
| Flatbush |
Haiti |
| Woodside |
Mexico |
| Queens Village |
Guyana |
| Bay Ridge |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Flatlands |
Haiti |
| Coney Island-Sea Gate |
Ukraine |
| North Corona |
Ecuador |
| Concourse-Concourse Village |
Dominican Republic |
| Sunset Park (Central) |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Soundview-Bruckner-Bronx River |
Dominican Republic |
| Crown Heights (North) |
Jamaica |
| Gravesend (East)-Homecrest |
Russia |
| University Heights (South)-Morris Heights |
Dominican Republic |
| Upper East Side-Lenox Hill-Roosevelt Island |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Bedford Park |
Dominican Republic |
| St. Albans |
Jamaica |
| Sunnyside |
Ecuador |
| Far Rockaway-Bayswater |
Jamaica |
| Mount Eden-Claremont (West) |
Dominican Republic |
| Williamsbridge-Olinville |
Jamaica |
| Jamaica Hills-Briarwood |
Bangladesh |
| Mount Hope |
Dominican Republic |
| Woodhaven |
Dominican Republic |
| Brighton Beach |
Ukraine |
| Wakefield-Woodlawn |
Jamaica |
| East Flatbush-Erasmus |
Haiti |
| Hamilton Heights-Sugar Hill |
Dominican Republic |
| Midwood |
Ukraine |
| Upper West Side (Central) |
Mexico |
| East Flushing |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Harlem (North) |
Dominican Republic |
| Bushwick (East) |
Dominican Republic |
| East Flatbush-Rugby |
Jamaica |
| Bedford-Stuyvesant (East) |
Dominican Republic |
| Madison |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Eastchester-Edenwald-Baychester |
Jamaica |
| University Heights (North)-Fordham |
Dominican Republic |
| East New York-City Line |
Bangladesh |
| Baisley Park |
Guyana |
| Dyker Heights |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Chinatown-Two Bridges |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Cypress Hills |
Dominican Republic |
| Upper West Side-Lincoln Square |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Sunset Park (West) |
Mexico |
| South Jamaica |
Guyana |
| Crown Heights (South) |
Jamaica |
| Norwood |
Dominican Republic |
| East Flatbush-Farragut |
Haiti |
| Astoria (Central) |
Mexico |
| Hell's Kitchen |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| East Flatbush-Remsen Village |
Jamaica |
| Richmond Hill |
Guyana |
| Maspeth |
Poland |
| Sunset Park (East)-Borough Park (West) |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Upper East Side-Yorkville |
India |
| East Village |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| East New York-New Lots |
Jamaica |
| Flatbush (West)-Ditmas Park-Parkville |
Bangladesh |
| College Point |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Brownsville |
Jamaica |
| East Harlem (South) |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Williamsburg |
Dominican Republic |
| Bedford-Stuyvesant (West) |
Dominican Republic |
| Rego Park |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Chelsea-Hudson Yards |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Bath Beach |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Inwood |
Dominican Republic |
| Auburndale |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Astoria (North)-Ditmars-Steinway | Greece |
| Bushwick (West) |
Dominican Republic |
| Borough Park |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Prospect Lefferts Gardens-Wingate |
Jamaica |
| Fordham Heights |
Dominican Republic |
| South Richmond Hill |
Guyana |
| Astoria (East)-Woodside (North) |
Mexico |
| Mott Haven-Port Morris |
Dominican Republic |
| Murray Hill-Kips Bay |
India |
| Pomonok-Electchester-Hillcrest |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Bayside |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| East Elmhurst |
Ecuador |
| Gravesend (South) |
Ukraine |
| East New York (North) |
Dominican Republic |
| Kensington |
Bangladesh |
| Ozone Park (North) |
Bangladesh |
| Lower East Side |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| East Harlem (North) |
Dominican Republic |
| Kew Gardens Hills |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Kingsbridge Heights-Van Cortlandt Village |
Dominican Republic |
| Bellerose |
India |
| Jamaica Estates-Holliswood |
Bangladesh |
| Grasmere-Arrochar-South Beach-Dongan Hills |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| New Springville-Willowbrook-Bulls Head-Travis |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Middle Village |
Poland |
| Marine Park-Mill Basin-Bergen Beach |
Ukraine |
| Financial District-Battery Park City |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Rockaway Beach-Arverne-Edgemere |
Guyana |
| East Williamsburg |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Harlem (South) |
Dominican Republic |
| Allerton |
Dominican Republic |
| Castle Hill-Unionport |
Dominican Republic |
| Queensboro Hill |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Upper West Side-Manhattan Valley |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Belmont |
Dominican Republic |
| Glendale |
Ecuador |
| Springfield Gardens (North)-Rochdale Village |
Jamaica |
| Carroll Gardens-Cobble Hill-Gowanus-Red Hook |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Ocean Hill |
Dominican Republic |
| Great Kills-Eltingville |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Hollis |
Guyana |
| Queensbridge-Ravenswood-Dutch Kills |
Bangladesh |
| Morningside Heights |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Parkchester |
Bangladesh |
| Upper East Side-Carnegie Hill | Canada |
| Long Island City-Hunters Point |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Rosedale |
Jamaica |
| Longwood |
Dominican Republic |
| Oakland Gardens-Hollis Hills |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Tremont |
Dominican Republic |
| Laurelton |
Jamaica |
| East Midtown-Turtle Bay |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Riverdale-Spuyten Duyvil |
Dominican Republic |
| Mapleton-Midwood (West) |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Greenpoint |
Poland |
| Glen Oaks-Floral Park-New Hyde Park |
India |
| Springfield Gardens (South)-Brookville |
Jamaica |
| Downtown Brooklyn-DUMBO-Boerum Hill |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Melrose |
Dominican Republic |
| Fresh Meadows-Utopia |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Whitestone-Beechhurst |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Park Slope |
Taiwan |
| Highbridge |
Dominican Republic |
| Crotona Park East |
Dominican Republic |
| Pelham Gardens |
Dominican Republic |
| Ozone Park |
Bangladesh |
| Co-op City |
Jamaica |
| Throgs Neck-Schuylerville |
Dominican Republic |
| Morrisania |
Dominican Republic |
| Douglaston-Little Neck |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| New Dorp-Midland Beach |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Kew Gardens |
Russia |
| Mariner's Harbor-Arlington-Graniteville |
Mexico |
| Todt Hill-Emerson Hill-Lighthouse Hill-Manor Heights |
India |
| Soundview-Clason Point |
Dominican Republic |
| Pelham Parkway-Van Nest |
Dominican Republic |
| Rosebank-Shore Acres-Park Hill |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Kingsbridge-Marble Hill |
Dominican Republic |
| Cambria Heights |
Jamaica |
| Midtown-Times Square |
India |
| West New Brighton-Silver Lake-Grymes Hill | Albania |
| Midtown South-Flatiron-Union Square |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Bay Terrace-Clearview |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Annadale-Huguenot-Prince's Bay-Woodrow | Italy |
| Fort Greene |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Morris Park |
Dominican Republic |
| Manhattanville-West Harlem |
Dominican Republic |
| SoHo-Little Italy-Hudson Square |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Pelham Bay-Country Club-City Island |
Dominican Republic |
| Westchester Square |
Bangladesh |
| Arden Heights-Rossville |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Greenwich Village |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Port Richmond |
Mexico |
| Howard Beach-Lindenwood | Italy |
| Westerleigh-Castleton Corners |
Mexico |
| West Village |
United Kingdom, excluding England and Scotland |
| Clinton Hill |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Tompkinsville-Stapleton-Clifton-Fox Hills |
Mexico |
| West Farms |
Dominican Republic |
| Spring Creek-Starrett City |
Ukraine |
| Old Astoria-Hallets Point |
Dominican Republic |
| Tribeca-Civic Center |
China, excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan |
| Windsor Terrace-South Slope |
Mexico |
| Claremont Village-Claremont (East) |
Dominican Republic |
| St. George-New Brighton |
Mexico |
| Prospect Heights | Canada |
| South Williamsburg |
Dominican Republic |
| Gramercy |
India |
| Oakwood-Richmondtown |
Ukraine |
| Hunts Point |
Dominican Republic |
| Brooklyn Heights |
United Kingdom, excluding England and Scotland |
| Breezy Point-Belle Harbor-Rockaway Park-Broad Channel | Ireland |
| Tottenville-Charleston |
Ukraine |
| Rikers Island |
Dominican Republic |
| Randall's Island |
Dominican Republic |
| Fort Hamilton |
Korea |
| Fort Wadsworth |
Mexico |
| Hutchinson Metro Center |
Ecuador |
| Alley Pond Park |
Israel |
| Holy Cross Cemetery |
Barbados |
| Miller Field |
Ecuador |
| Freshkills Park (South) |
Poland |
| Barren Island-Floyd Bennett Field |
Panama |
| Pelham Bay Park |
Trinidad and Tobago |
| Sunnyside Yards (North) |
Japan |
| Jacob Riis Park-Fort Tilden-Breezy Point Tip |
Germany |
| Bronx Park |
South Africa |
Chinese New Yorkers are found across all five boroughs and in many cases congregate inside Chinatown enclaves where storefronts and restaurants in Mandarin and Cantonese are familiar sights.
While Manhattan’s Chinatown is the most famous in the city, and perhaps the world, today Queens is home to the largest Chinatown outside of Asia, in the neighborhood of Flushing.
However, ahead even of Chinese New Yorkers are their Dominican counterparts, which make up over 12% of the city’s population.
Despite the Dominican Republic being miniscule in size compared to giants like China or India, Dominicans are the largest immigrant group in New York. They also tend to be far more concentrated, with a vast majority residing in the Bronx and Upper Manhattan neighborhoods like Inwood, East Harlem, and Washington Heights.
Interestingly, the first ever permanent, non-indigenous resident of what is today New York City was actually born in the Spanish colony which would become the Dominican Republic. Juan Rodriguez, a trader of mixed European and African descent, arrived on Manhattan Island in 1613.
Beyond Chinese and Dominican New Yorkers, the city is home to millions of others, often with some borough-wide differences.
Queens has become home to thousands of Caribbean immigrants from countries like Jamaica and Guyana, while some neighborhoods in Brooklyn and Staten Island retain their old-world connections through sizable Italian, Polish, and Ukrainian populations.
Beyond the Dominicans, nearly a third of New Yorkers claim some sort of Latin American ancestry, with sizable populations in particular of Mexicans, Ecuadorians, and Colombians. South Asians like Bengalis and Indians are also well represented across all five boroughs.
Over 800 languages are spoken in New York today, and the city is known for its sizable ethnic enclaves in which large immigrant populations congregate.
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out New York City has over 5,600 Millionaire Renters on Voronoi, the new app from Visual Capitalist.
2026-03-01 06:38:51

This chart, created by Oscar Leo of DataCanvas, compares the long-run population trends of Africa and Europe using UN Population Projections compiled by Our World in Data. It highlights one of the most dramatic demographic shifts of the past 100 years, and the even bigger changes expected ahead.
Below is a comparison of population data in Europe and Africa from 1950 to 2024, and projected out until 2100.
| Year | Africa Population (M) | Europe Population (M) |
|---|---|---|
| 1950 | 227.8 | 548.9 |
| 1960 | 283.9 | 605.8 |
| 1970 | 365.6 | 657.0 |
| 1980 | 483.1 | 694.3 |
| 1990 | 643.8 | 724.1 |
| 2000 | 830.6 | 728.2 |
| 2010 | 1,072.2 | 738.1 |
| 2020 | 1,380.8 | 749.5 |
| 2030 | 1,727.2 | 738.4 |
| 2040 | 2,095.7 | 722.1 |
| 2050 | 2,466.6 | 703.0 |
| 2060 | 2,821.5 | 676.2 |
| 2070 | 3,145.2 | 648.6 |
| 2080 | 3,424.7 | 626.4 |
| 2090 | 3,649.0 | 608.7 |
| 2100 | 3,813.9 | 592.3 |
In 1900, Europe had roughly 407 million people, nearly three times Africa’s 139 million.
By 2100, Africa is projected to reach 3.8 billion, while Europe declines to about 592 million.
In the 19th and early 20th centuries, Europe was a dominant population center. Industrialization, urbanization, and improvements in medicine drove rapid growth, even as millions emigrated abroad.

Europe’s population peaked in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. Since then, aging populations and persistently low fertility rates have slowed growth and, in many countries, triggered outright decline.
Africa’s recent demographic surge is more rapid and structurally transformative.
Over the past few decades, Africa’s population has expanded rapidly due to high fertility rates and falling child mortality. Today, it is the fastest-growing continent.
According to UN projections, Africa will account for a large share of global population growth this century. By 2100, nearly one in three people on Earth could live on the continent.
This shift is closely tied to broader global trends, as shown in our analysis of the world’s top countries by population in 2100, where several African nations climb into the top ranks.
The divergence between Europe and Africa reflects differences in:
The result is a profound rebalancing of global demographics. Two centuries ago, Europe was a population heavyweight and Africa comparatively small. By the end of this century, Africa will be the clear demographic engine of the world.
2026-03-01 05:08:45

This was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.
This map, created by Iswardi Ishak using a variety of government statements and media reports, shows how countries responded to invitations to join former President Donald Trump’s proposed “Board of Peace.”
The initiative aims to convene a coalition of states to promote negotiated settlements in active conflicts, with early discussions reportedly focused on the Middle East.
Below is a breakdown of each country’s official stance as of February 21, 2026:
| Country | Response to Board of Peace Invitation |
|---|---|
| Austria | Declined |
| Croatia | Declined |
| France | Declined |
| Germany | Declined |
| Ireland | Declined |
| New Zealand | Declined |
| Norway | Declined |
| Slovenia | Declined |
| Spain | Declined |
| Sweden | Declined |
| United Kingdom | Declined |
| Vatican City | Declined |
| Albania | Member |
| Argentina | Member |
| Armenia | Member |
| Azerbaijan | Member |
| Bahrain | Member |
| Belarus | Member |
| Bulgaria | Member |
| Cambodia | Member |
| Egypt | Member |
| El Salvador | Member |
| Hungary | Member |
| Indonesia | Member |
| Israel | Member |
| Jordan | Member |
| Kazakhstan | Member |
| Kosovo | Member |
| Kuwait | Member |
| Mongolia | Member |
| Morocco | Member |
| Pakistan | Member |
| Paraguay | Member |
| Qatar | Member |
| Saudi Arabia | Member |
| Turkey | Member |
| United Arab Emirates | Member |
| United States of America | Member |
| Uzbekistan | Member |
| Vietnam | Member |
| Australia | No Response |
| Brazil | No Response |
| China | No Response |
| Netherlands | No Response |
| Philippines | No Response |
| Russia | No Response |
| Singapore | No Response |
| Ukraine | No Response |
| Cyprus | Observer |
| Czechia | Observer |
| Finland | Observer |
| Greece | Observer |
| India | Observer |
| Italy | Observer |
| Japan | Observer |
| Mexico | Observer |
| Oman | Observer |
| Poland | Observer |
| Portugal | Observer |
| Romania | Observer |
| Slovakia | Observer |
| South Korea | Observer |
| Switzerland | Observer |
| Thailand | Observer |
| Canada | Rescinded |
The response forms a patchwork. While parts of the Middle East and Eastern Europe signed on, much of Western Europe declined outright. Meanwhile, several major economies opted for observer roles, signaling caution rather than full endorsement.
Countries that accepted span multiple regions, including Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, Pakistan, Argentina, Hungary, and Israel. Several Gulf states, such as Qatar, the UAE, and Bahrain, also joined.
To participate, nations were reportedly required to endorse a framework centered on mediated negotiations and reconstruction funding mechanisms. According to media coverage of the Board’s first meeting, discussions emphasized post-conflict governance models and humanitarian coordination, though no binding agreements have yet been announced.
The geographic spread suggests stronger uptake among countries with closer diplomatic or strategic ties to Washington, as well as states seeking a more active role in shaping conflict resolution talks.
A third group—including India, Japan, Italy, Greece, and Switzerland—declined formal membership but sent envoys as observers.
This approach allows governments to stay informed and potentially influence discussions without committing to the Board’s structure or political implications. For some European countries, this middle-ground response reflects a balancing act between alliance commitments and domestic political considerations.
Several Western European nations—including France, Germany, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom—declined the invitation entirely. Australia and Brazil also did not formally accept.
Canada’s situation stands out. Initially invited, Ottawa’s invitation was later withdrawn amid diplomatic friction.
The shift came after Prime Minister Mark Carney’s speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, where he warned of the “collapse” or erosion of the postwar rules-based international order. While he did not mention the United States or Donald Trump by name, his address was widely interpreted as a veiled critique of the second Trump administration’s foreign policy. Within hours of Carney’s speech, Trump took to social media to officially withdraw the invitation, describing the Board of Peace as the “most prestigious Board of Leaders ever assembled”.
Also of note are the broad swaths of gray on the map. These nations, including almost all of Africa, did not receive an invite to join the Board.
Whether the Board of Peace evolves into a durable diplomatic forum, or remains symbolic, will likely depend on whether it produces tangible ceasefires, reconstruction frameworks, or formal agreements.
For now, the map illustrates a divided international community navigating an increasingly complex peace landscape.
Interested in how global conflict trends are shifting over time? Explore Peace Agreements Have Notably Declined on the Voronoi app to see how formal peace deals have changed in recent decades—and what that could mean for new initiatives like the Board of Peace.