MoreRSS

site iconThe Practical DeveloperModify

A constructive and inclusive social network for software developers.
Please copy the RSS to your reader, or quickly subscribe to:

Inoreader Feedly Follow Feedbin Local Reader

Rss preview of Blog of The Practical Developer

How to Be Productive, Deliver More, and Get Ahead With AI (Without Burning Out) — A Senior Frontend Developer’s Perspective

2025-11-17 23:38:29

Productivity in 2025 is no longer about doing more tasks — it’s about doing the right things, faster, with AI as your multiplier.

As a senior frontend developer, you’re juggling:

  • Feature planning
  • UI/UX discussions
  • Tech design
  • Coding
  • Reviewing PRs
  • Supporting juniors
  • Production issues
  • Documentation
  • Deadlines

AI helps you streamline all of this — if you use it right.

This article walks through how to be insanely productive, with real-world scenarios from a frontend engineer’s daily workflow.

The New Productivity Formula for Developers

Productivity = Time × AI Leverage × Focus — Distractions

AI gives you leverage.
Focus gives you momentum.
Together, they turn you into a 10× engineer without burning out.

1. Automate the Low-Value Work

(Real-World Frontend Example: PR Summaries, Documentation, and Boilerplate)

As a senior dev, you shouldn’t spend time on:

  • Writing repetitive PR descriptions
  • Documenting obvious changes
  • Creating basic React components
  • Generating API mocks
  • Writing unit test skeletons
  • Searching for snippets you’ve written 100 times

AI can do all of that instantly.

Example:

You're building a “Saved Cards” screen. After finishing the UI:

Instead of writing this manually:

  • PR title
  • PR description
  • Test cases
  • Component documentation
  • Edge cases
  • API mock response

You paste your diff or code into AI and say:

“Generate a clear PR description, test cases, and UX edge cases for this component.”

You save 20–30 minutes per PR.

Multiply that over a year… that’s days of time saved.

2. Use AI to Improve Your Thinking

(Real-World Frontend Example: Architecture & Trade-Off Decisions)

As a senior dev, your biggest responsibility is decision-making.

Should you:

  • Use debounce or throttle?
  • Use Zustand or Redux Toolkit?
  • Use React Query or write your own fetch wrappers?
  • Cache API responses or re-fetch?
  • Use Server Components or client-only?
  • Use Chakra UI or Tailwind?

Instead of endless Google rabbit holes, AI helps you reason instantly.

Example:

You’re building a dashboard with frequent API updates.

Ask AI:

“Given a real-time dashboard with 10+ API calls, compare polling, WebSockets, and SSE with pros/cons, scalability, cost, and ease of implementation.”

You get:

  • Trade-offs
  • Real-world implications
  • Suggested approach
  • Performance notes

AI becomes your architecture assistant, helping you avoid bad decisions.

3. Write 10× Faster

(Real-World Example: Emails, Tech Specs, Feature Summaries)

Senior developers write more than juniors:

  • RFCs
  • Design documents
  • Comments
  • Onboarding docs
  • Status updates
  • Bug analysis

AI eliminates the blank-screen problem.

Example:

Your PM asks:

“Can you send a quick summary of the new caching strategy?”

Instead of typing manually, you say:

“Summarize this caching strategy in a non-technical tone for product managers.”

AI produces a clean paragraph. You edit it for accuracy. Done in 2 minutes.

4. Supercharge Your Learning

(Real-World Example: Debugging & Understanding Complex Browser Behavior)

Learning on the job is constant, especially in frontend where tools evolve daily.

Example:

You're debugging why a modal animation feels janky on low-end Android devices.

Ask AI:

“Explain how browser layout, paint, and composite cycles work using this example animation code.”

AI breaks down:

  • Which CSS properties trigger repaint
  • How GPU compositing works
  • Why transform performs better than top/left
  • How to measure jank using DevTools

You learn in 5 minutes what could have taken an hour.

5. Build Side Projects Faster

(Real-World Frontend Example: Creating Full Stacks in a Weekend)

Side projects differentiate senior developers from others.
AI helps you build 3–5× faster.

Example:

You want to build a “Latency Checker for AWS Media Regions” (like you did).

You ask AI:

  • To generate an architecture using React + AWS Lambda
  • To provide the initial UI layout
  • To create loading skeleton states
  • To generate sample test data
  • To generate API handlers
  • To generate Lighthouse performance improvements

It doesn't replace you.
It boosts your throughput.

What used to take 2 weeks can now be done in 3 days.

6. Stay Consistent, Not Motivated

(Real-World Example: Weekly Planning and Task Breakdown)

Motivation dies.
Consistency wins.

AI helps you plan realistically.

Example:

On Monday, you tell AI:

“Help me plan my week as a senior frontend dev working on a dashboard project. Break tasks into 45-minute work blocks.”

It generates:

  • Feature tasks
  • Refactor tasks
  • Testing blocks
  • Review blocks
  • Buffer time for bugs

By Wednesday evening, you ask:

“Show me what I accomplished and what I should move to tomorrow.”

AI acts like:

  • Project manager
  • Accountability partner
  • Planning assistant

You stay on track, even on low-motivation days.

7. Use the AI Feedback Loop

(Real-World Example: Improving PRs and Coding Style)

After finishing code, ask AI:

“Review this code for readability, best practices, and performance. Suggest improvements.”

AI points out:

  • Complex conditions
  • Missing memoization
  • Large components
  • Repeated logic
  • Inefficient data structures

You're not just writing faster —
you’re writing better.

This compounds your skills over months.

8. Avoid the Biggest Mistake: Fully Delegating Thinking

AI writes code.

But only you know:

  • App architecture
  • Business rules
  • Edge cases
  • Team standards
  • Performance strategies

AI should assist —
not replace judgment.

Example:

AI writes a React Query hook.
You must still:

  • Add cache configs
  • Handle race conditions
  • Apply correct stale times
  • Handle OAuth expiries
  • Consider offline scenarios

This is why senior devs remain invaluable.

9. Your Competitive Advantage: Learning & Delivering 5× Faster

The modern frontend ecosystem moves ridiculously fast:

  • React Server Components
  • Signals architecture
  • Browser performance APIs
  • Web components
  • Edge runtimes
  • AI-assisted dev flows

The developer who learns faster
wins faster.

AI gives you:

  • A coach
  • A tutor
  • A debugger
  • A reviewer
  • A senior architect
  • A documentation generator

All in one.

That's unfair leverage —
use it.

Final Thoughts — The Future Belongs to AI-Augmented Developers

AI won't replace frontend developers.
But AI-augmented developers will outperform everyone else.

If you want to deliver more, grow faster, and stay ahead:

  • Automate low-value tasks
  • Use AI for thinking, planning, and debugging
  • Build projects faster
  • Communicate better
  • Learn continuously
  • Use AI as leverage, not a crutch

Don’t try to compete with AI.
Collaborate with it — and multiply your output.

Project Structure in Umami codebase - Part 1.0

2025-11-17 23:30:00

Inspired by BulletProof React, I applied its codebase architecture concepts to the Umami codebase.

  1. What is Umami?

  2. What is a project structure?

What is Umami?

Umami is an open-source, privacy-focused web analytics tool that serves as an alternative to Google Analytics. It provides essential insights into website traffic, user behavior, and performance, all while prioritizing data privacy.

Unlike many traditional analytics platforms, Umami does not collect or store personal data, avoiding the need for cookies, and is GDPR and PECR compliant.

Designed to be lightweight and easy to set up, Umami can be self-hosted, giving users full control over their data.

A detailed getting started guide can be found at umami.is/docs.

Quickstart

To get Umami up and running you will need to:

  1. Install the application

  2. Log into the application

  3. Add a website

  4. Add the tracking code into your website HTML

I pulled the above information from the Umami docs.

What is a project structure?

In Bulletproof React, Project structure documentation explains about the purpose of files and folders in src folder and talks about the feature folder.

When you work in a team, it is crucial to establish and follow standards and best practices in your project, otherwise every developer has their own preferences and in the end, you will end up with a spaghetti codebase.

Umami is built using Next.js. We will review the following folders in Umami codebase:

  1. src

  2. app

  3. component

  4. lib

  5. permission

  6. queries

  7. store

  8. tracker

Conclusion

To manage a project, you need to put files and folders where they belong so later on, you will know where to look for. Put things where they belong. 

You cannot place database queries inside a components folder as this components can only hold UI components unless your team has a different meaning to a component and then may be you can place the queries inside a components folder.

For example, Umami’s components folder actually holds hooks and other things, so it is not just the UI components but rather components in their “system”.

About me:

Hey, my name is Ramu Narasinga. I study codebase architecture in large open-source projects.

Email: [email protected]

I spent 200+ hours analyzing Supabase, shadcn/ui, LobeChat. Found the patterns that separate AI slop from production code. Stop refactoring AI slop. Start with proven patterns. Check out production-grade projects at thinkthroo.com

References:

  1. https://github.com/alan2207/bulletproof-react/blob/master/docs/project-structure.md

  2. https://github.com/umami-software/umami/tree/master/src

Snapshots Fix Symptoms 📸💥➡️🩹 — Sandboxes Prevent Problems 🏖️🛠️✅

2025-11-17 23:29:31

In Jira administration, snapshots and sandboxes are often confused. Both are useful — but they solve very different problems:

Snapshots: Recover after something breaks.
Sandboxes: Prevent issues before they reach production.

Many teams rely on snapshots thinking they’re “safe testing.” In reality, snapshots only help after an issue occurs. Sandboxes let you test safely before users are affected.

🔄 Snapshots: Quick Fixes

Snapshots are great for rolling back misconfigurations or failed updates, but they have limits:

  • Freeze the system, not behavior
  • Encourage “test in production” habits
  • Don’t help with upgrades
  • Hide root causes

A rollback may stop the symptoms, but it won’t explain what caused the problem or prevent it from returning.

🧱 Sandboxes: Prevent Problems

A sandbox is an isolated, production-like Jira environment used exclusively for testing. It allows you to:

  • Test plugin updates safely
  • Simulate Jira upgrades
  • Debug issues without affecting users
  • Validate migrations and scaling

With sandboxes, you can experiment freely, test risky changes, and ensure production stays stable.

🧠 Snapshots vs Sandboxes
Snapshots:

  • Fix what broke
  • Reactive
  • Temporary relief

Sandboxes:

  • Prevent issues
  • Proactive
  • Reliable safety

Prevention is cheaper, faster, and less stressful than recovery.

🚀 Sandboxes Made Easy

Setting up sandboxes used to be slow: installing Jira, configuring clusters, restoring backups, matching production.

Today, automation tools can spin up production-like sandboxes in minutes, making safe testing a daily habit instead of a rare luxury.

🏁 Final Thought

Snapshots undo damage — sandboxes prevent it.

If you want to:
✔ Avoid plugin outages
✔ Test Jira upgrades confidently
✔ Debug issues without user impact
✔ Reduce downtime
✔ Build a stable, predictable Jira environment

Then sandboxes aren’t optional — they’re essential.

Snapshots fix symptoms 📸💥; Sandboxes prevent problems 🏖️✅

💬 Have you tried sandboxes in your Jira setup? What’s worked for your team?

How to Write Functions in Fortran in 2025?

2025-11-17 23:29:23

Fortran, a powerful language widely used in scientific and engineering applications, continues to be relevant in 2025 due to its performance and efficiency in numerical computations. In this guide, you will learn how to write functions in Fortran, a fundamental concept that is critical for extending the language's capabilities. This article will also provide useful links to related Fortran resources for further learning.

Understanding Functions in Fortran

Functions in Fortran are similar to subroutines, serving as reusable blocks of code. They are used to perform a calculation or process that returns a single value. Functions can encapsulate specific tasks, making your code more organized and easier to debug.

Key Characteristics of Fortran Functions:

  1. Return Values: Functions return a single value that can be of any data type.
  2. Modular Design: Promotes code reusability and better organization.
  3. Parameter Passing: Accept parameters to perform operations.

Steps to Write a Function in Fortran

Here's a step-by-step guide on how to write a simple function in Fortran:

Step 1: Define the Function

A function in Fortran is defined using the FUNCTION keyword. It must specify the type of value it returns. For instance, if you are writing a function to add two integers, the function’s return type will be INTEGER.

FUNCTION AddTwoNumbers(a, b) RESULT(sum)
  INTEGER :: a, b
  INTEGER :: sum
  sum = a + b
END FUNCTION AddTwoNumbers

Step 2: Declare the Function in a Program

To use the function, you need to declare it in your main program or module. This enables the compiler to recognize and utilize the function within your Fortran code.

PROGRAM Main
  INTEGER :: result
  result = AddTwoNumbers(5, 10)
  PRINT *, "The sum is ", result
END PROGRAM Main

Step 3: Compile and Execute

Compile your Fortran code using a Fortran compiler like gfortran or ifort. Ensure your development environment is set up correctly to avoid build errors.

gfortran -o add_numbers add_numbers.f90
./add_numbers

Best Practices for Writing Functions in Fortran

  • Use Descriptive Names: Ensure your function names are descriptive and indicative of their functionality.
  • Limit Function Length: Keep your functions concise and limited to a specific task.
  • Consistent Documentation: Use comments to describe the purpose and behavior of your functions, aiding future maintenance or updates.

Challenges and Solutions

As of 2025, integrating Fortran functions in mixed-language projects is increasingly common. You may face challenges when working alongside languages like C++. Using tools such as CMake can streamline the build configuration. For further details, check the Fortran and C++ build configuration resource.

Best Fortran Programming Books to Buy in 2025

Product Price
Fortran Programming in easy steps
Fortran Programming in easy steps
Don't miss out ✨

Brand Logo
Schaum's Outline of Programming With Fortran 77
Schaum's Outline of Programming With Fortran 77
Don't miss out ✨

Brand Logo
Abstracting Away the Machine: The History of the FORTRAN Programming Language (FORmula TRANslation)
Abstracting Away the Machine: The History of the FORTRAN Programming Language (FORmula TRANslation)
Don't miss out ✨

Brand Logo
Comprehensive Fortran Programming: Advanced Concepts and Techniques
Comprehensive Fortran Programming: Advanced Concepts and Techniques
Don't miss out ✨

Brand Logo
FORTRAN FOR SCIENTISTS & ENGINEERS
FORTRAN FOR SCIENTISTS & ENGINEERS
Don't miss out ✨

Brand Logo

Useful Links

To deepen your understanding of Fortran and its applications, explore the following resources:

By following the guidelines above, you'll be well on your way to mastering function writing in Fortran. Continue to explore more resources and practice to enhance your Fortran programming skills in 2025 and beyond.

Why AI Tools Are Becoming Essential for Retail Investors in 2025

2025-11-17 23:28:20

In 2025, retail investors are facing one major challenge: information overload.
The stock market moves faster than ever, and keeping track of news, events, and trends has become extremely difficult without automation. This is why AI-based market tools have become essential for anyone who wants to stay ahead.

📌 1. AI Helps Investors Filter Important News

Most market news platforms show hundreds of updates every day.
But only a few news items actually impact stock movement.

AI can:

Detect important events

Highlight high-impact news

Remove irrelevant noise

Save time for traders and investors

This allows retail investors to focus on what truly matters.

📌 2. AI Provides Faster Market Insights

Stock trends change within minutes.
AI processes data in real time and gives quick insights such as:

Market sentiment

Trend direction

Stock-wise developments

Event impact predictions

This helps investors react faster.

📌 3. AI Reduces Emotional Investing

Most retail investors lose money because of:

Fear

FOMO

Panic selling

Overconfidence

AI tools offer data-driven insights, helping users make decisions based on facts instead of emotions.

📌 4. AI Makes Research Easy for Beginners

New investors often don’t know:

Where to find data

What news matters

How to analyze trends

How to read market signals

AI tools simplify research with:

Automated summaries

Visual insights

Trend charts

Smart alerts

This makes investing accessible to everyone.

📌 Final Thoughts

AI is no longer optional for retail investors — it is a necessity in 2025.
With faster insights, better accuracy, and reduced emotional bias, AI tools help traders stay ahead in a competitive market.

🔗 Related Link

Gainipo Market Updates: https://www.gainipo.com/

Temperature, Tokens, and Context Windows: The Three Pillars of LLM Control

2025-11-17 23:28:03

📚 Tech Acronyms Reference

Quick reference for acronyms used in this article:

  • AI - Artificial Intelligence
  • API - Application Programming Interface
  • BERT - Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers
  • BPE - Byte-Pair Encoding
  • DB - Database
  • GPT - Generative Pre-trained Transformer
  • GPU - Graphics Processing Unit
  • JSON - JavaScript Object Notation
  • LLM - Large Language Model
  • NLP - Natural Language Processing
  • Q&A - Question and Answer
  • RAG - Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  • ROI - Return on Investment
  • SQL - Structured Query Language
  • TF-IDF - Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency
  • XML - Extensible Markup Language

🎯 Introduction: Beyond the Hidden

Let's be real: most engineers interact with Large Language Models (LLMs) through a thin wrapper that hides what's actually happening. You send a string, you get a string back. It feels like magic.

But here's the thing—if you're building production LLM systems, especially as a data engineer responsible for pipelines that process millions of requests, you need to understand what's under the hood.

As a data engineer, you already know how to build pipelines, optimize queries, and manage infrastructure at scale. Now it's time to apply that same rigor to Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems—and understand the fundamentals that separate expensive experiments from Return on Investment (ROI)-positive production systems.

This isn't about reading research papers or implementing transformers from scratch. It's about understanding the three fundamental controls that determine:

  • How much you'll pay (tokens)
  • What quality you'll get (temperature)
  • What constraints you're working within (context windows)

Miss these fundamentals, and you'll either blow your budget, ship unreliable systems, or both.

Let me show you why these three concepts matter, starting from first principles.

💡 Data Engineer's ROI Lens

Throughout this article, we'll view every concept through three questions:

  1. How does this impact cost? (Token efficiency, compute, storage)
  2. How does this affect reliability? (Consistency, error rates, failures)
  3. How does this scale? (Batch processing, throughput, latency)

These aren't just theoretical concepts—they're the levers that determine whether your AI initiative delivers value or burns budget.

🔤 Part 1: Tokenization Deep-Dive

What Actually IS a Token?

Here's what most people think: "A token is a word."

Wrong.

A token is a subword unit created through a process called Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE). It's the fundamental unit that Large Language Models (LLMs) process—not characters, not words, but something in between.

Why Subword Tokenization?

Think about it from a data engineering perspective. If we treated every unique word as a token, we'd have problems:

Problem 1: Vocabulary Explosion

  • English has ~170,000 words in common use
  • Add technical terms, proper nouns, typos, slang → millions of possible "words"
  • Storing and computing with a multi-million token vocabulary? Computationally expensive and memory-intensive.

Problem 2: Out-of-Vocabulary Words

  • What happens when the model sees "ChatGPT" but was only trained on "chat" and "GPT" separately?
  • With word-level tokenization, you'd have an unknown token [UNK]. Information lost.

The BPE Solution:

BPE builds a vocabulary by iteratively merging the most frequent character pairs.

Here's the intuition:

  1. Start with individual characters: ['h', 'e', 'l', 'l', 'o']
  2. Find most frequent pair: 'l' + 'l' → merge into 'll'
  3. Continue: 'he' + 'llo''hello' (if frequent enough)
  4. Common words become single tokens; rare words split into subwords

Real Example:

Let's tokenize these strings (using GPT tokenizer):

"Hello World" → ["Hello", " World"] = 2 tokens
"Hello, World!" → ["Hello", ",", " World", "!"] = 4 tokens  
"HelloWorld" → ["Hello", "World"] = 2 tokens
"hello world" → ["hello", " world"] = 2 tokens

Notice:

  • Capitalization affects tokenization
  • Punctuation often becomes separate tokens
  • Spaces are part of tokens (notice " World" with leading space)

The Stop Words Question: Do LLMs Care?

If you've worked with traditional Natural Language Processing (NLP) (think Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF), bag-of-words), you know about stop words—common words like "the", "is", "at", "which" that are often filtered out because they carry little semantic meaning.

Here's the interesting part: LLMs don't use stop word lists. They tokenize everything.

Why?

Traditional NLP (Natural Language Processing) reasoning:
"The cat sat on the mat" → Remove stop words → "cat sat mat" → Easier processing, less noise

LLM (Large Language Model) reasoning:
"The cat sat on the mat" has grammatical structure. Those "meaningless" words actually encode relationships, tense, and context that matter for understanding.

Example:

  • "The contract is valid" (present tense, current state)
  • "The contract was valid" (past tense, no longer true)

That "is" vs "was" changes everything. Stop words matter.

But here's the tokenization insight:

Common words like "the", "is", "and" are so frequent that BPE assigns them single tokens. Rare words get split into multiple tokens.

"The" → 1 token (very common)
"Constantinople" → 4-5 tokens (less common)
"Antidisestablishmentarianism" → 8-10 tokens (rare)

So while LLMs don't filter stop words, they handle them efficiently through tokenization. Common words = cheap (1 token). Rare words = expensive (multiple tokens).

Data Engineering Implication:

When estimating token costs for text processing pipelines, documents with lots of common English words will be cheaper per character than documents with:

  • Technical jargon
  • Domain-specific terminology
  • Non-English text
  • Proper nouns and neologisms

A 1,000-word customer support ticket in plain English might be 1,300 tokens. A 1,000-word legal document with Latin phrases and case names might be 1,800+ tokens.

The Multilingual Problem

Here's where it gets expensive for data engineers building global systems:

English: "Hello" → 1 token
Japanese: "こんにちは" → 3-4 tokens (depending on tokenizer)
Arabic: "مرحبا" → 3-5 tokens
Code: `def hello_world():` → 5-7 tokens

Why?

Most LLM tokenizers (like OpenAI's) are trained primarily on English text. Non-Latin scripts get broken into smaller byte-level tokens, inflating token count.

Cost Impact for Data Engineers:

If you're processing customer support tickets in 10 languages:

  • English baseline: 1,000 tokens/ticket
  • Japanese: 2,500 tokens/ticket (2.5x multiplier)
  • Arabic: 2,200 tokens/ticket (2.2x multiplier)

At $0.002 per 1K tokens (input) and $0.006 per 1K tokens (output):

  • English: $0.002 input + $0.006 output = $0.008/ticket
  • Japanese: $0.005 input + $0.015 output = $0.020/ticket

Scaling to 1M tickets/month: That's $8K vs $20K—a $12K/month difference just from tokenization.

Real-World ROI Example:

A fintech company processing multilingual loan applications learned this the hard way:

Before understanding tokenization:

  • Estimated: 1,000 applications/day × $0.05/application = $50/day
  • Budget: ~$18K/year

Reality check (production launch):

  • Multilingual documents (Spanish, Portuguese, Chinese)
  • JSON structured output requirements
  • Actual cost: $0.12/application = $120/day = $44K/year

Ouch. 2.4x over budget.

After optimization:

  • Implemented dynamic batching (16 docs per API call)
  • Used sliding context windows (reduced history bloat)
  • Switched to cheaper models for extraction, premium for analysis
  • Result: $0.04/application = $40/day = $15K/year

Annual impact: $44K → $15K = $29K saved (66% cost reduction)

This is why understanding tokens, temperature, and context windows isn't academic—it's the difference between a profitable AI system and an expensive mistake.

The Token Count Isn't What You Think

Common mistake: Estimating tokens by word count.

Rule of thumb: 1 token ≈ 4 characters in English
But this breaks for:
- Code (lots of special characters)
- Non-English languages
- Text with heavy punctuation
- Structured data (JavaScript Object Notation (JSON), Extensible Markup Language (XML))

Example with JSON:

{"name": "John", "age": 30}

You might think: "That's like 6 words, so ~6 tokens."

Actual token count: 11 tokens

["{", "name", "\":", " \"", "John", "\",", " \"", "age", "\":", " ", "30", "}"]

Every brace, colon, quote—they often become separate tokens.

Lesson for Data Engineers: When building LLM pipelines that output structured data, account for the token overhead of formatting. A 100-word natural language response might be 125 tokens, but the same information as JSON could be 180+ tokens.

Vocabulary Size Trade-offs

Modern LLMs use vocabularies of 50K-100K tokens.

GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer)-3/4: ~50K tokens

LLaMA (Large Language Model Meta AI): ~32K tokens

PaLM (Pathways Language Model): ~256K tokens

Why not bigger?

The final layer of an LLM computes probabilities over the entire vocabulary. With 50K tokens and a hidden dimension of 12,288 (GPT-4), that's a matrix of:

50,000 × 12,288 = 614,400,000 parameters

Just for the final projection layer. Larger vocabularies = more parameters = more compute.

Why not smaller?

Smaller vocabularies mean longer token sequences for the same text. Remember, attention mechanisms scale at O(n²) with sequence length. More tokens = more computation.

There's a sweet spot, and most modern LLMs landed on 50K-100K.

🌡️ Part 2: Temperature and Sampling Strategies

The Probability Distribution Problem

Here's what's actually happening when an LLM generates text:

Step 1: The model processes your input and produces logits (raw scores) for every token in its vocabulary.

logits = {
  "the": 4.2,
  "a": 3.8,
  "an": 2.1,
  "hello": 1.5,
  ...
  "zebra": -3.2
}

These aren't probabilities yet—they're unbounded scores.

Step 2: Apply softmax to convert logits into a probability distribution:

P(token) = e^(logit) / Σ(e^(logit_i))

This gives us:

probabilities = {
  "the": 0.45,
  "a": 0.38,
  "an": 0.10,
  "hello": 0.05,
  ...
  "zebra": 0.0001
}

Now we have a valid probability distribution (sums to 1.0).

Step 3: Sample from this distribution to pick the next token.

What Temperature Actually Does

Temperature is applied before the softmax:

P(token) = e^(logit/T) / Σ(e^(logit_i/T))

Where T is temperature.

Temperature = 1.0 (default):

  • No modification to logits
  • Standard probability distribution

Temperature = 0.0 (deterministic):

  • Effectively becomes argmax (always pick highest logit)
  • Same input → same output (mostly—more on this later)

Temperature > 1.0 (e.g., 1.5):

  • Divides logits, flattening the distribution
  • Lower-probability tokens get more chance

Temperature < 1.0 (e.g., 0.3):

  • Multiplies effective logits, sharpening the distribution
  • Higher-probability tokens dominate even more

Visualizing Temperature

Let's say we have these logits for the next token:

Original logits:
"the": 4.0
"a": 3.0  
"an": 2.0
"hello": 0.5

At Temperature = 1.0:

After softmax:

"the": 0.53 (53% chance)
"a": 0.20 (20% chance)
"an": 0.07 (7% chance)  
"hello": 0.016 (1.6% chance)

At Temperature = 0.5 (sharper):

Divide logits by 0.5 (= multiply by 2):

"the": 8.0
"a": 6.0
"an": 4.0
"hello": 1.0

After softmax:

"the": 0.84 (84% chance) ← Much more confident
"a": 0.11 (11% chance)
"an": 0.04 (4% chance)
"hello": 0.007 (0.7% chance)

At Temperature = 2.0 (flatter):

Divide logits by 2.0:

"the": 2.0
"a": 1.5
"an": 1.0  
"hello": 0.25

After softmax:

"the": 0.36 (36% chance) ← Less confident
"a": 0.22 (22% chance)
"an": 0.13 (13% chance)
"hello": 0.06 (6% chance)

Key Insight: Temperature doesn't change the order of probabilities—"the" is always most likely. It changes how much more likely the top choice is compared to others.

When to Use Each Temperature

Temperature = 0.0: Deterministic Tasks

  • Structured Query Language (SQL) query generation
  • Data extraction from text
  • Classification tasks
  • Any time you need consistency across runs

Temperature = 0.3-0.5: Focused but Varied

  • Technical documentation
  • Code generation (with some creativity)
  • Summarization where facts matter

Temperature = 0.7-0.9: Balanced Creativity

  • Conversational Artificial Intelligence (AI)
  • Question and Answer (Q&A) systems
  • Content generation with personality

Temperature = 1.0+: High Creativity

  • Creative writing
  • Brainstorming
  • Generating diverse options

Real-World Temperature ROI:

A legal tech company building a contract analysis tool discovered the hard way that temperature matters:

Initial approach (temp=0.7):

  • Used for Structured Query Language (SQL) query generation from natural language
  • Failure rate: 43% of generated queries had syntax errors
  • Manual review required for every query
  • Cost: Developer time reviewing = $50/hour

After understanding temperature (temp=0.0):

  • Same task, temp=0 for deterministic SQL generation
  • Failure rate: 3% (mostly edge cases)
  • Manual review only on failures
  • Result: 93% reduction in review time

ROI Impact:

  • 1,000 queries/day × 2 min review/query × $50/hour = $1,667/day wasted
  • After optimization: 30 queries/day × 2 min review × $50/hour = $50/day
  • Annual savings: $590K

One parameter change. Massive return on investment (ROI).

Beyond Temperature: Top-p and Top-k

Temperature alone isn't enough. Even at temp=0.7, you might sample a very low-probability token (the "zebra" with 0.01% chance).

Top-k Sampling:

Only consider the top k most likely tokens. Set the rest to probability 0, then renormalize.

Top-k = 3 means only consider the 3 most likely tokens:
"the": 0.53 → renormalized to 0.66
"a": 0.20 → renormalized to 0.25
"an": 0.07 → renormalized to 0.09
"hello": 0.016 → ignored (probability = 0)

Top-p (Nucleus) Sampling:

More adaptive. Instead of fixed k, include the smallest set of tokens whose cumulative probability exceeds p.

Top-p = 0.9 means include tokens until cumulative probability ≥ 90%:

"the": 0.53 (cumulative: 53%)
"a": 0.20 (cumulative: 73%)
"an": 0.07 (cumulative: 80%)
"hello": 0.016 (cumulative: 81.6%)
... keep adding until cumulative ≥ 90%

Why Top-p > Top-k:

Top-k is rigid. If the model is very confident, maybe only 2 tokens are reasonable, but you're forcing it to consider 50. If it's uncertain, maybe 100 tokens are plausible, but you're limiting to 50.

Top-p adapts to the model's confidence. High confidence? Small nucleus. Low confidence? Larger nucleus.

Most production systems use: temperature=0.7, top_p=0.9, top_k=0 (disabled)

The "Temperature = 0 Isn't Deterministic" Gotcha

You'd think temp=0 always gives the same output for the same input.

Not quite.

Even at temp=0:

  • Floating point precision: Different hardware might round differently
  • Top-p still applies: If you have top_p=0.9 with temp=0, you're still sampling from the top 90% mass
  • Non-deterministic operations: Some implementations use non-deterministic Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) operations

For true determinism: Set temperature=0, top_p=1.0, seed=42 (and pray the API supports seeded generation).

🪟 Part 3: Context Windows and Memory Constraints

What IS a Context Window?

The context window is the maximum number of tokens an LLM can process in a single request (input + output combined).

Common context windows:

  • GPT-3.5: 4K tokens (~3,000 words)
  • GPT-4: 8K tokens (base), 32K tokens (extended)
  • GPT-4 Turbo: 128K tokens (~96,000 words)
  • Claude 2 (Anthropic): 100K tokens
  • Claude 3 (Anthropic): 200K tokens

But here's what data engineers need to understand: It's not just about "how much text fits." It's about computational complexity.

The O(n²) Problem

Transformers use self-attention, which computes relationships between every token and every other token.

For a sequence of length n, that's:

n × n = n² comparisons

Example:

  • 1,000 tokens: 1,000,000 attention computations
  • 2,000 tokens: 4,000,000 attention computations (4x)
  • 4,000 tokens: 16,000,000 attention computations (16x)

Quadratic scaling is brutal.

This is why longer context windows are:

  1. More expensive (more compute per request)
  2. Slower (more operations to process)
  3. More memory-intensive (need to store that n×n attention matrix)

Why Context Windows Exist

It's not an arbitrary limit. It's a memory and compute constraint.

During training, transformers are trained on sequences of a fixed maximum length (e.g., 8,192 tokens). The model learns positional encodings for positions 0 to 8,191.

What happens at position 8,192?

The model has never seen it. Positional encodings break down. Attention patterns become unreliable.

Modern techniques (like ALiBi, rotary embeddings) help extend beyond training length, but there are still practical limits.

Token Counting in Context

Critical for data engineers: Context window includes input + output.

Context window: 8,192 tokens
Your prompt: 7,000 tokens
Model's max output: 1,192 tokens

If the model tries to generate more than 1,192 tokens, it'll hit the limit mid-generation and truncate.

Even worse: Some APIs reserve tokens for special markers, formatting, system messages. Your effective context might be 8,192 - 500 = 7,692 tokens.

Context Management Strategies

Strategy 1: Sliding Windows

Instead of keeping full conversation history, maintain a sliding window:

Window size: 2,000 tokens
New message: 300 tokens

Option A: Drop oldest messages until total ≤ 2,000
Option B: Keep first message (system context) + last N messages
Option C: Keep first + last, drop middle (risky—loses context)

Strategy 2: Summarization

Periodically summarize old messages:

Messages 1-10: "User asked about product features. We discussed pricing, integrations, and support."
Messages 11-15: [keep full text]

Trade-off: Summarization costs tokens (you need to generate the summary), but saves tokens long-term.

Strategy 3: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)

Don't put everything in context. Store information externally (vector Database (DB)), retrieve relevant chunks, inject into context.

User query: "What's our refund policy?"
→ Retrieve top 3 relevant docs (500 tokens)
→ Include only those in context
→ Generate response

This pattern allows you to work with unlimited knowledge bases while staying within context window constraints.

Batch Processing Implications for Data Engineers

If you're processing millions of documents, context windows create batch size constraints.

Example: Embedding Generation

You want to embed 100,000 customer support tickets (avg 500 tokens each).

Naive approach:

for ticket in tickets:
    embedding = embed(ticket)  # 1 Application Programming Interface (API) call per ticket

Result: 100,000 API calls. Slow. Rate-limited. Expensive.

Batch approach:

batch_size = 16  # Fit within context window
for batch in chunks(tickets, batch_size):
    embeddings = embed(batch)  # 1 API call for 16 tickets

Result: 6,250 API calls. Much better.

But there's a catch: If your context window is 8K tokens, and you batch 16 tickets at 500 tokens each = 8,000 tokens, you're at the limit. If one ticket is 600 tokens, you overflow.

Solution: Dynamic batching based on token count, not fixed batch size.

# Pseudocode
current_batch = []
current_tokens = 0
max_batch_tokens = 7500  # Leave buffer

for ticket in tickets:
    ticket_tokens = count_tokens(ticket)

    if current_tokens + ticket_tokens > max_batch_tokens:
        # Process current batch
        embeddings = embed(current_batch)
        # Start new batch
        current_batch = [ticket]
        current_tokens = ticket_tokens
    else:
        current_batch.append(ticket)
        current_tokens += ticket_tokens

This is basic data engineering—but it matters for LLM pipelines.

Cost Implications

Context windows directly impact cost.

OpenAI Pricing (GPT-4):

  • Input: $0.03 per 1K tokens
  • Output: $0.06 per 1K tokens

Scenario: Customer support chatbot

Average conversation:
- System message: 200 tokens
- Conversation history: 1,500 tokens  
- User message: 100 tokens
- Response: 200 tokens

Input tokens per message: 200 + 1,500 + 100 = 1,800
Output tokens per message: 200

Cost per message: (1.8 × $0.03) + (0.2 × $0.06) = $0.054 + $0.012 = $0.066

At 100,000 messages/month: $6,600/month

Optimization: Sliding window (keep last 500 tokens of history)

Input tokens per message: 200 + 500 + 100 = 800
Cost per message: (0.8 × $0.03) + (0.2 × $0.06) = $0.024 + $0.012 = $0.036

At 100,000 messages/month: $3,600/month

Savings: $3,000/month just from context management.

🎯 Conclusion: The Foundation of ROI-Positive AI Systems

Understanding tokens, temperature, and context windows isn't academic—it's the foundation of every cost optimization, quality improvement, and scaling decision you'll make in production.

As a data engineer, you know that small inefficiencies compound at scale. A 20% optimization in query performance isn't just "nice to have"—it's millions of dollars when you're processing petabytes. The same principle applies to Large Language Model (LLM) systems.

The Business Impact:

These three fundamentals directly control:

💰 Cost:

  • Token efficiency across languages and formats (2-3x cost difference)
  • Context window optimization ($3K/month savings from simple sliding windows)
  • Batch processing strategies (6,250 API calls vs 100,000)
  • Temperature selection (one parameter = $590K annual savings)

📊 Quality:

  • Appropriate temperature for your use case (43% → 3% error rate)
  • Sampling strategies (top-p, top-k for controlled creativity)
  • Maintaining context in multi-turn interactions (user experience)

⚡ Performance:

  • Quadratic scaling of attention with context length (understand before you scale)
  • Batch size constraints from token limits (throughput optimization)
  • Rate limiting and throughput planning (production readiness)

The ROI Pattern:

Every example we've seen follows the same pattern:

  1. Underestimate complexity → Budget overruns or quality issues
  2. Understand fundamentals → Make informed architecture decisions
  3. Optimize systematically → 60-90% cost reductions, 10x quality improvements

This is your competitive advantage. Most teams treat LLMs as black boxes and pay the price in production. You'll understand the levers that matter.

Key Takeaways for Data Engineers

On Tokens:

  • Tokens ≠ words. They're Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) subword units.
  • Common English words = 1 token. Rare words, non-English text, code = multiple tokens.
  • Action: Always count tokens programmatically, never estimate by word count.
  • ROI Impact: Multilingual support can cost 2-3x more than estimated.

On Temperature:

  • Temperature controls probability distribution sharpness, not "randomness."
  • temp=0 for deterministic tasks (SQL, extraction). temp=0.7-0.9 for creative tasks.
  • Combine with top-p (nucleus sampling) for adaptive token selection.
  • Action: Match temperature to your use case's consistency requirements.
  • ROI Impact: Wrong temperature = 40%+ error rates. Right temperature = 3%.

On Context Windows:

  • Context = input + output tokens combined. It's a compute constraint, not arbitrary.
  • Attention scales at O(n²). Double the context = 4x the compute cost.
  • Manage proactively: sliding windows, summarization, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG).
  • Action: Monitor token usage per request. Optimize before it becomes expensive.
  • ROI Impact: Context management alone can save $3K+/month at moderate scale.

Found this helpful? Drop a comment with the biggest "aha!" moment you had, or share how you're applying these concepts in your production systems.