MoreRSS

site iconThe New YorkerModify

The full text is output by feedx. A weekly magazine since 1925, blends insightful journalism, witty cartoons, and literary fiction into a cultural landmark.
Please copy the RSS to your reader, or quickly subscribe to:

Inoreader Feedly Follow Feedbin Local Reader

Rss preview of Blog of The New Yorker

The Battle for Minneapolis

2026-01-26 06:06:02

2026-01-25T21:06:49.476Z

On January 23rd, residents of Minneapolis who have been protesting the presence of ICE agents in their city declared a general strike. I had spent much of the previous week there, and the strike had been talked about as the culmination of the city’s anger at the deployment of three thousand immigration agents into the region. That Friday, businesses suspended operations for the day, museums didn’t open, and people stayed home from work. Thousands gathered for anti-ICE demonstrations in subzero temperatures in downtown Minneapolis. About a hundred clergy members staged a sit-in at the Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport and were arrested.

Around nine the next morning, federal agents shot and killed Alex Pretti, a thirty-seven-year-old Minneapolis resident who worked as an I.C.U. nurse at a V.A. hospital. It was the third shooting of a Minneapolis civilian by federal agents this month, and the second fatality. “Not again,” says a voice in the first video I saw of the event, recorded from across the street. As with Renee Nicole Good, a Minneapolis resident whom an ICE agent named Jonathan Ross had shot and killed during a confrontation between anti-ICE activists and federal agents on January 7th, and Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis, a Venezuelan immigrant who was struck in the leg a week later, the Department of Homeland Security quickly asserted that the victim had posed a threat, and that its agents had acted in self-defense. Pretti “approached US Border Patrol officers with a 9 mm semi-automatic handgun,” the D.H.S. said in an initial statement. The Minneapolis police chief said that Pretti was licensed to carry a gun; it appears to have been holstered and doesn’t seem visible in his hands at any point in the video footage circulating online. The D.H.S. has said that it will lead the investigation into Pretti’s death, despite the fact that its agents have, according to the Minneapolis mayor, Jacob Frey, committed two of the three homicides that have taken place in the city so far this year.

For the rest of the day, Trump Administration officials continued to deflect accountability. Posting on X, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi blamed Pretti’s killing on Minneapolis being a sanctuary city; Kristi Noem, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in a press conference, criticized protesters for obstructing officers; Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth urged “shame on the leadership of Minnesota—and the lunatics in the street.” Pretti’s family issued its own statement. “The sickening lies told about our son by the administration are reprehensible and disgusting,” it read. “Alex is clearly not holding a gun when attacked by Trump’s murdering and cowardly ICE agents.”

The city reëntered a state of paralysis and grief. The Guthrie Theatre and the concert venue First Avenue cancelled that evening’s shows, the Timberwolves game against the Golden State Warriors was postponed, the Saint Paul Winter Carnival called off its annual King Boreas’ Grande Day Parade, and the National Guard was activated. On the coldest weekend of the winter, protesters again took to the streets.

People wearing masks put their hands up during a protest on a city street.
People protesting the fatal shooting of thirty-seven-year-old Alex Pretti by a Border Patrol agent.
A person receives care after being injured during a protest.
People tend to a protester after he was pepper-sprayed during a demonstration.
Law enforcement officers run down a city street.
Federal agents clear a street of protesters.

I had arrived in Minneapolis a little more than a week earlier, on January 14th. That evening, at around seven-thirty, news started breaking that federal immigration agents had, for the second time in a little over a week, shot someone in Minneapolis. Within minutes, and with few details available, people began converging on the scene, a residential block of north Minneapolis on the other side of the city from where Good had been killed. I arrived at the vicinity of the second shooting after nine o’clock that night. Temperatures were in the low teens.

“Go home!” someone standing in a group of fifty or so onlookers shouted at a few dozen ICE agents, in desert camo and gas masks, lined up in front of them. The two groups were separated by a strip of yellow police tape that neither side appeared to be interested in crossing. According to information that would later emerge, a federal agent had shot Sosa-Celis as he fled. Accounts would differ as to what had happened. In an F.B.I. affidavit, an ICE agent claimed that Sosa-Celis had attacked him with a broom; Sosa-Celis, who has been charged with assaulting a federal officer, denied the charges through his lawyer, and has said that he was holding a shovel but didn’t hit anyone with it, and that he had made it back inside his house before he was shot. By the time I arrived, Sosa-Celis had been taken away in an ambulance and hospitalized. (In a statement, the Department of Homeland Security said that Sosa-Celis entered the U.S. illegally in 2022, and had convictions for driving without a license and for giving a local law-enforcement officer a false name; he remains in detention.) Now the homes lining the street were mostly dark, their shades drawn. Tear gas hung in the air.

“We know y’all cold, y’all not from here, get your ass home,” a demonstrator yelled. “Leave!” shouted another. I was raised in Minneapolis, a city whose activism became front-page news after the murder of George Floyd by a police officer, in 2020. When you grow up in Minneapolis, and then you leave it, two truths become apparent: winters everywhere else seem fake, and no other city’s politics seem as doggedly progressive, not even New York’s or Los Angeles’s, the Democratic strongholds where I have spent a lot of my adult life. Political postures treated as unrealistic in other cities are seriously considered here, such as a 2021 ballot amendment to replace the Minneapolis Police Department with a department of public safety. (The proposal failed, with fifty-six per cent of voters rejecting it.) Minneapolis leftists might be gently mocked on the national stage—consider the character Paigyn of the television show “Landman,” a nonbinary, vegan college student from the city who has a pet ferret—but their convictions run much deeper than stereotypes about wokeness. The politics statewide are more divided, with the state House and Senate both nearly evenly split along party lines, but Minnesota has continued to elect Democrats to office and to swing blue in Presidential elections even as states around it have turned increasingly red.

A snowy scene of a house with a poster outside.
A poster of Renee Good, who was killed in Minneapolis by a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer, Jonathan Ross, on January 7, 2026.

In recent years, Minnesota’s Midwestern political exceptionalism has given it increasing influence in the Democratic Party: its governor, Tim Walz, was the 2024 Vice-Presidential nominee; Ken Martin, the former chair of the state’s Democratic Party (known here as the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, or D.F.L.), now leads the Democratic National Committee. And these politics may have made Minnesota a focus of the Trump Administration, which has sought to flood the state with federal agents and assert its political will. “FEAR NOT, GREAT PEOPLE OF MINNESOTA, THE DAY OF RECKONING & RETRIBUTION IS COMING!” Donald Trump had posted on social media the day before the second shooting.

The pretext, as it has often been with the Trump Administration, is immigration enforcement. In recent years, federal investigators have uncovered widespread billing fraud in Minnesota’s extensive social-safety net, which purportedly cost the state an estimated nine billion dollars or more since 2018 and has led to roughly sixty criminal convictions, mostly of Somali Americans. Aimee Bock, whom prosecutors called the “mastermind” of the biggest fraud scheme, is a white U.S. citizen who grew up in Minnesota, but that has not stopped Trump from framing the misconduct as an immigration issue. Trump has repeatedly denigrated Minnesota’s Somali Americans, an overwhelming majority of whom are U.S. citizens by birth or naturalization, and said that they should “go back to where they came from”; the Somali American congresswoman Ilhan Omar, whose Minneapolis district has elected her to four terms in office, is another frequent target of his insults.

In December, the D.H.S. started inundating the city with immigration agents, as part of what it is calling Operation Metro Surge. At first, the influx seemed similar to ones in Los Angeles and Chicago last year. In Minneapolis, as in those cities, ICE agents encountered organized resistance from activists on the ground, some of whom had been preparing since the 2024 election for the mass-deportation efforts Trump had promised. The conflict met its violent apex with Good’s killing. One poll of registered voters from around the country found that eighty per cent of respondents had seen a video of it, focussing the nation’s attention once again on Minnesota.

With the help of engagement-driven algorithms on social media, countless videos then circulated of federal agents in Minneapolis attacking people at a local high school, pepper-spraying activists in the face, and snatching suspected immigrants from their cars or at work. Before the killing, Trump deployed another two thousand federal agents to conduct immigration raids in Minnesota. (For context, the Minneapolis Police Department has roughly six hundred officers.) He also tried to target funding for the state’s food-stamp benefits. (A judge temporarily blocked the move.) After the Department of Justice pushed to launch a criminal investigation into Good’s wife, Becca Good, six prosecutors resigned from the local U.S. Attorney’s office, including Joseph Thompson, who had led the successful prosecution of the social benefits fraud. (Becca Good’s attorney told NBC News that his client has not been told she is under federal investigation.) Renee Good’s killing prompted Minnesotans to start attending know-your-rights training sessions in droves. One organization, Unidos MN, has instructed more than twenty-six thousand volunteers to be neighborhood legal observers—recently, nearly every training has reached capacity. Meanwhile, the detentions continue; Kristi Noem claimed on January 19th that D.H.S. had arrested three thousand “criminal illegal aliens” in Minneapolis in the prior six weeks.

From a nearby intersection, where another group of demonstrators had congregated, came the sound of flash-bangs, followed by yet another cloud of tear gas. I retreated from the scene with Ben Pettee and Isaac Wilkowske, whom I had met on the walk over from my car; both wore ski goggles, medical masks, and voluminous winter clothing. Pettee works as a policy aide for a local city councilperson; Wilkowske is an audio-visual technician at the University of Minnesota. The friends had been hanging out in the Y.M.C.A. sauna; when news of the shooting started spreading, they got dressed and quickly headed to the North Side.

“It feels like, I don’t know, there’s a certain different tension in the air,” Pettee said. “Isaac, would you say that?”

“Yeah, ever since last week,” Wilkowske replied, referring to Good’s shooting. “All bets are off.”

A large truck with flashing lights inched past, with “Crime Scene Team” and the logo of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension printed on its side. Wilkowske explained the significance. “Basically, the F.B.I., like, snatched the body of Renee and took the crime scene away from Minnesota B.C.A.,” he explained. (The F.B.I. and the Department of Justice have declined to launch a criminal investigation into Good’s death.) “Minnesota B.C.A. is the first one to investigate cop shootings. Every time there’s an officer-involved shooting, B.C.A. comes through,” he said. He took the truck’s presence as a good sign that the local government was asserting its jurisdiction. But it was also confusing. “Is everything we’re seeing from all these law-enforcement agencies a collaboration or a standoff?” Pettee asked. “It’s really hard to know.”

We reached Pettee’s car, where he plugged in his phone and then sat on it for a few minutes to try to warm it up enough to power on. Then, looking for a spare mask to lend me, he rooted under several sleds piled in the back. A long line of American-brand S.U.V.s with tinted windows, the telltale vehicles of federal agents, streamed past.

Two protesters near a law enforcement officer during an outdoor protest.
Protesters gather around federal agents at a gas station in the city.
Posters of people killed by law enforcement hang on a fence.
Posters of people who died after law-enforcement encounters in the Minneapolis area hang on a fence near the site of Good’s memorial.
A man gestures toward law enforcement vehicles.
ICE vehicles enter the Whipple Federal Building.

The next morning I sat in the back seat of a midsize car, next to a pair of hockey skates and some cross-country ski poles, as a pair of friends drove together around South Minneapolis, monitoring the area for ICE. Thousands of Twin Cities residents have started observing ICE, from cars or on foot, since the surge began. Others volunteer to drive workers to their jobs, monitor school drop-offs and pickups, or deliver groceries to people too scared to leave their homes. “A lot of the precedent for that was George Floyd,” an activist named Matthew Rodreick, who lives a little more than a block away from where Good was killed and about a mile from the site of Floyd’s murder, told me. In 2020, a system of block associations with captains and group chats was set up. Back then, Rodreick said, “I was out wandering the streets until five in the morning with neighbors making sure that nobody’s house was lit on fire, and we chased people out,” he said, referring to outsiders whom he believed were there to cause property damage. “And now that is happening again, and there’s this sense of immediately going back to that.” Although citizens cannot legally obstruct ICE from making arrests, they are allowed to watch and record, a right that was upheld on January 16th by a federal judge, who temporarily blocked federal agents from “retaliating against persons who are engaged in peaceful and unobstructive protest activity”—by arresting them, for example, or using chemical irritants against them. On January 21st, an appeals court suspended the order. The same day, Greg Bovino, a commander-at-large of Border Patrol and the most prominent Trump official on the ground during the surge in Minnesota, was recorded personally lobbing a cannister of gas at a group of anti-ICE protesters.

That morning, it did not take very long for the driver and his friend, whom I’ll call John and Sam, to spot an S.U.V. with tinted windows that looked suspicious to them.

“Is that the one we were following before?” Sam asked.

“No, that was an Expedition. This is a Suburban,” John, who was driving, replied. He took out a pair of binoculars and looked at the license plate, which was out of state.

“Oh, yeah, this is the intimidator guy,” he said, without elaboration.

A license-plate check with other observers in their chat confirmed that the car was a known ICE vehicle. Maintaining about a block of distance between them, John and Sam began following the S.U.V. (The A.C.L.U. has said that following law enforcement vehicles at a safe distance is legal as long as active operations aren’t obstructed and traffic laws are obeyed.) The Suburban’s driver soon became cognizant that he was being followed, and a game of cat and mouse began. At one point, the S.U.V. made a U-turn and drove past us. The driver, who wore glasses and no mask, gave a little wave.

“That was the first unmasked one I’ve seen,” John said.

Later, after temporarily parting ways with the S.U.V., the observers met it at a right angle at an intersection. John reversed, backing up and then stopping along the side of the street to avoid the impression that he was seeking an active confrontation. The S.U.V. turned into the oncoming traffic lane so that it now directly blocked us. For a minute, nothing happened. Then the S.U.V. pulled up alongside us, and its passengers rolled down their windows. This time they wore face coverings. In the back seat, one of the men held his phone camera out. (ICE uses facial-recognition technology to identify people.) The driver of the S.U.V. made a pointing gesture at John, then drove on.

“It probably already was, but now your car is, like, completely made,” Sam said.

“I’ve had them film it so many times,” John said.

They decided not to continue following the S.U.V.

The volunteer observation system has the flaws common to any vigilante system. Observers can get overzealous, and have misidentified ordinary people as federal agents. But John and Sam clearly felt that, without their observation, nobody would be holding ICE accountable. Local law-enforcement agencies, for the most part, have not intervened in ICE actions.

“We have a paramilitary force in our city acting beyond the Constitution consistently,” Sam said. “Clearly, they are just racially profiling people straight up, right? Complete violations of the Fourth Amendment, everywhere.”

“I just worry, like, what does it get us? I agree with you, but how do you enforce the Constitution?” John said.

They sat for a minute.

“You drive around,” John said.

“You drive around the neighborhood with a friend and make the best decisions you can,” Sam agreed.

Some restaurants in Minneapolis now keep their doors locked. The owners of a small neighborhood restaurant in South Minneapolis, a married couple who asked to stay anonymous because they feared retribution from the government, told me that they have started driving their nonwhite employees to and from work to try to protect them. (They submitted the necessary I-9 forms to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services for all of their employees on hiring, they said, although the wife added, “We’re not document experts.”) When I met the couple at their restaurant one morning before lunch service, they both started to cry. The husband, who is a person of color, described how he now carries his passport card with him at all times, as does their son; the wife, who is white, feels less threatened. They listed several restaurants in the area that have made the decision to close, either to protect their staff or because their workers were too afraid to come in.

“It feels like there’s a really broad swath of people that they are going after that has less to do with their, like, actual status and more to do with just vibes—you know, do you have an accent? What color is your skin? Are you going to culturally relevant grocery stores or restaurants or churches?” Athena Hollins, a state representative from a district in St. Paul, told me. “That’s reflected across the Twin Cities, because we’ve had so many people who have been detained who are U.S. citizens.”

A twenty-year-old Somali American named Mubashir Khalif Hussen, a plaintiff in an A.C.L.U. lawsuit, was detained while walking down the street on his lunch break, despite being a naturalized U.S. citizen and offering to provide proof of his documentation several times. Nasra Ahmed, a twenty-three-year-old U.S.-born citizen of Somali descent, was detained for two days and, she said in a later press conference, sustained a concussion and was called a racial slur during her arrest. Local media has reported the detention of U.S. citizens of Latino, Hmong, and Native American heritage, as well. Local officials have attested that even off-duty police officers have been subjected to what appear to be racially motivated demands for proof of citizenship by federal agents. (In September, the Supreme Court cleared the way for federal agents to use race or ethnicity as a reason for questioning someone’s immigration status.)

In response, some people of color in the Twin Cities have limited their movements, regardless of their immigration status. Richard Gray, an emergency-room physician at Hennepin Healthcare, which serves a significant immigrant population and was the state’s first Level 1 trauma center (it is where Renee Good was taken after being shot), told me that patients have been intimidated into staying home. “Our census has dropped, our clinics are having more missed appointments,” he said. “During the day, we’re almost dead because I think a lot of the people have decided, right or wrong, that it’s safer to move around in the evening when they can’t be seen to be of color in their cars.” On January 8th, two days after a news conference outside the hospital in which local activists demonstrated against the presence of ICE agents there, D.H.S. subpoenaed Hennepin Healthcare’s employment records. (Some businesses who speak out in the media about the presence of ICE in Minnesota have found themselves the target of I-9 audits.)

A man stands in front near a stockpile of food supplies.
Sergio Amezcua, a pastor at Dios Habla Hoy church, in Minneapolis.

Sergio Amezcua, a Mexican American pastor at Dios Habla Hoy, a nondenominational Christian church in South Minneapolis, started a grocery-delivery program for families whose livelihoods have been affected since the ICE surge began, in early December. On the first day, some two thousand households signed up. Now more than twenty-seven thousand predominantly Latino families have requested food through a network of twenty-two churches and twelve schools. The program has all but taken over Amezcua’s church, where enormous sacks of onions and potatoes are piled on the front steps, boxes of oranges fill a back room, and donations of diapers and formula have their own designated entrance.

“Someone told me that this looks like a hurricane-relief program,” he said, when I met him in his office. He sat under a family portrait of his wife and four children. The volunteers at the church are mostly American citizens, but vehicles driven by suspected ICE agents have passed by, taking photos and recording footage. Amezcua was of the opinion that Trump was using the ICE surge for political retribution. “People in the middle, which is our community, are paying the price for it,” he said. “And you’re getting this from a conservative pastor.”

A makeshift barricade on a city street.
A makeshift barricade at a protest in Minneapolis.

Donald Trump has characterized those opposed to the presence of ICE in Minneapolis as paid agitators and insurrectionists. The people acting as legal observers whom I spoke with rejected that characterization. “We are law-abiding citizens,” Adam Levy, a sixty-one-year-old St. Paul resident and touring musician who has been watching agents in his neighborhood since December, told me. “We’ve all got families, we’ve got kids, and we’re committed to protecting folks right now. It’s not about, like, wanting to bomb ICE or kill people.”

Federal agents attempting to stop U.S. citizens from monitoring them have broken observers’ car windows, doused them with pepper spray, and shoved protesters to the ground. They have detained, shackled, and interrogated people before releasing them without charges. They have, at times, led the observers following them to the observers’ own homes.

On January 11th, Patty O’Keefe and Brandon Sigüenza, two friends who live in Minneapolis, were driving in a South Side neighborhood when a group chat alerted them to a confrontation between ICE agents and observers. When they arrived on the scene, the agents were leaving. “We proceeded to follow them down a side street, Sixteenth Avenue, honking our horn and blowing our whistles,” O’Keefe said.

The agents stopped, got out, and ordered O’Keefe, who was driving, to stop following them. It was only a few days after Good was killed, and emotions were high. As the agents began returning to their car, Sigüenza recalled, “Patty yelled, ‘Get the fuck out,’ and I started yelling Renee Good’s name.” An agent wearing a Timberwolves hat stopped and turned back. “He grabbed his pepper spray, came back to the car, and sprayed it into the intake vent of the car, like passing it back and forth,” Sigüenza said. When O’Keefe and Sigüenza continued following the agents despite the pepper spray now filling the car, the agents again stopped, got out, and smashed the windows of their Prius. (O’Keefe told me that they were not asked to get out of the car before their windows were smashed; Sigüenza said that his door had not been locked.) This time, the agents removed them both from the car and handcuffed them.

O’Keefe and Sigüenza have spoken to many media outlets, in part, it seemed to me, to process for themselves what had happened. In separate vehicles, they were driven to the B. H. Whipple Federal Building, where D.H.S. has been bringing the people it detains. O’Keefe said that during the drive the agents mocked her appearance and photographed her. “They were, like, ‘Oh, man, she has no good sides at all,’ ” she told me. She said that the agent in the Timberwolves hat lectured her to stop obstructing ICE, and added, in her words: “ ‘That’s why that lesbian bitch is dead’—speaking about Renee Good.”

A uniformed law enforcement officer stands in a convenience store.
Greg Bovino, a commander-at-large of Border Patrol, waits at a gas station after a rest-room break.
A sign against immigration authorities hangs on a fence.
Anti-ICE signage near the Whipple building.
A protester is dragged by law enforcement during a scuffle.
Border Patrol agents drag a protester during a confrontation.

At the Whipple building, the friends were cuffed at the ankles and placed in cells designated for U.S. citizens, separated by gender. Sigüenza was given a phone call; O’Keefe was not. O’Keefe struck up a conversation with her cellmate, a former U.S. marine named Skye, who asked that her last name not be published. That morning, Skye had tailed multiple convoys of federal agents with a companion; it was her first day out observing. The first convoy she followed, who she says were U.S. Border Patrol agents, led her on a tour of her current and former Minneapolis homes, and also addressed her by name, presumably to show they knew her identity. Another convoy led her to a rural area where at least one agent unholstered his weapon. With what had happened to Good in mind, she left and went to a Speedway gas station to collect herself. After leaving the gas station, she noticed two cars, including a Ford Expedition, following her. (“We were actually going to head home because we’d had enough weapons pointed our way that day,” she said.) Instead, the agents in the Expedition blocked her, smashed the window of her car, and threatened to tase her and her companion. She was ordered out of the car and arrested. “There were about four agents on top of me, they were handcuffing me and twisting my arm,” she said. “One of them tried to put my ankle in an ankle lock and tried to break my ankle, and when I screamed he said, ‘Yeah, you fucking like that, don’t you?” Once at Whipple, she continued, the agents took turns tightening her handcuffs, and it later took multiple people to get them off. Other people working there mocked her appearance. “They were saying, ‘Is it a guy or is it a girl? I don’t know.”

The three activists recalled how disorganized the operation seemed to be. “It didn’t seem like there was a system in place,” Sigüenza said. From inside the citizen cells, they could hear crying and yelling from the area where non-U.S. citizens were being held. Sigüenza and O’Keefe were both interrogated by agents who identified themselves as investigators for Homeland Security and asked them for information about plans for violence.

“I was, like, ‘You guys are way too afraid of us,’ ” O’Keefe, who works for a nonprofit that advocates for clean energy, said. “Like, no, I don’t know of anyone doing that.”

“They think we’re, like, you know, in cells with commanding officers in military barracks,” Sigüenza, who is a special-education teacher, added. “Like, I’m just a teacher, man. I was confused, kind of, like, Bro, who do you think I am?”

A woman sits for a portrait while a man stands behind her in a room.
Brandon Sigüenza and Patty O’Keefe pose for a portrait in Sigüenza’s apartment. Both are U.S. citizens who were detained while observing ICE operations in the city.

Both friends were asked for names. “He wanted the names of protest organizers. He wanted the names of undocumented people,” Sigüenza said. The agent tried to bargain with him. “He said, you know, ‘If you have family that’s out of the country that needs help getting in, we can help with that.’ ” (Sigüenza’s father, a naturalized citizen, was born in Mexico; his mother is from Wisconsin.) Sigüenza said that the agent also offered money, although he didn’t specify how much. (Both O’Keefe and Sigüenza said that they did not share any names.) D.H.S. did not respond to a request for comment, but in other media outlets D.H.S. Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin has said that O’Keefe and Sigüenza were given multiple warnings to stop impeding law enforcement before getting arrested on January 11th. McLaughlin has also refuted claims that D.H.S. offered any “agitators” money in exchange “for information leading to the arrest of illegal aliens.”

After more than eight hours in custody, both were released without charges. (Skye had been released earlier, also without charges.) When O’Keefe asked if there was any documentation of what had happened, she was told to file a Freedom of Information Act request. Sigüenza was released onto the sidewalk in front of the entrance to the Whipple building’s parking lot, on the other side of the street from the site of a days-long protest. Caught by happenstance in another skirmish, he was pepper-sprayed and hit with a projectile on his way out of detention. Skye also exited into the street, where a protester lent her a phone to call a ride and get back to her car. It was left where she had been detained, in the suburb of Mendota Heights, windows smashed, her phone and car keys still inside.

On January 15th, Trump began teasing the idea that he would evoke the Insurrection Act, which would allow the Administration to send military troops to Minnesota.

“We do believe that one of the reasons why he sent this paramilitary occupation into our state, why this level of terror is taking place when we are seeing the kind of chaos that is ensuing, is because he wants to invoke the Insurrection Act,” Ilhan Omar, speaking after a field hearing in St. Paul on January 16th, said. “And we are telling our constituents not to take the bait. We are telling our constituents to lawfully practice their First Amendment rights.”

A crowd gathers for a vigil in the cold.
A vigil for Pretti at Whittier Park.

For now, there’s little more that the people of Minneapolis can do. On the morning after Pretti’s death, I stopped by the memorial that had formed where the shooting had taken place. Mourners arrived with flowers, a couple of them sang, one sat on her knees sobbing. The intersection of Twenty-Sixth Street and Nicollet Avenue is normally a lively area with restaurants, coffee shops, a yoga studio. Cheapo Records, a Minneapolis landmark that still sells used CDs, occupies one corner. I’d eaten dinner within a couple of blocks of the intersection several times over the past ten days, and one night had happened upon a punk-rock show behind the Black Forest Inn, a German restaurant that’s been around since the sixties. Now it had become an intersection with signs and votive candles. Counting George Floyd, it is the third site within a small stretch of South Minneapolis that will become synonymous with a violent death at the hands of law enforcement.

Sigüenza, who is a history buff, told me that he had been thinking about the historical parallels throughout his detention. The Whipple building is situated at Fort Snelling, where more than sixteen hundred Dakota people were held captive by U.S. troops during the U.S.-Dakota War of 1862. He said that at the school where he teaches, which is in a suburb with a significant Latino population, children have been staying home out of fear. He noticed that during interviews about his experience, the focus has often been on his treatment as a U.S. citizen, which struck him as misguided.

“In my personal opinion, I don’t care about your documentation status—you’re my neighbor,” he told me. “The people they rounded up, they know how to drive in the snow, they have good coats: they’re Minnesotans.” ♦



Witnessing Another Public Killing in Minneapolis

2026-01-26 06:06:02

2026-01-25T21:12:20.005Z

“They killed another guy,” someone announced, in my group chat. That message was followed quickly by a link to a video, shot from behind a pane of glass, level with the street. Sadly, you’ve probably seen that video by now: ICE and Border Patrol agents in Minneapolis surround a slim young man squirming helplessly on the ground. Then, suddenly, the indifferent crack of a gunshot. The man’s body goes limp and falls to the ground. Someone near the camera starts to shout. “What the fuck,” the voice says. “They killed—did they fucking kill that guy? Are you fucking kidding me, dude? Not again! Are you fucking kidding me? That guy’s dead.”

“That guy” was Alex Pretti, a thirty-seven-year-old I.C.U. nurse serving in the Veterans Administration Health System. But even before the lost man’s name was widely known, his public killing was made exponentially more public by way of its rapid dissemination over social media and, soon, the news. Eerily echoing the aftermath of the killing—also unwarranted, also dehumanizingly public—of Renee Nicole Good, on January 7th, new angles of the horror started to emerge. In the first video of Pretti that was sent around, you can see a woman in a bright coat, on the opposite side of the street, standing closer to the melee, and also recording the scene. Online, people kept asking where the “woman in the pink coat” might be.

Before long, her angle hit the feed. Now anybody seeking the truth could plainly see that Pretti himself had been holding a smartphone camera, trying to make an honest document of events. One of the ICE agents—recognizable in what has become their uniform of choice: boots and loose pants and sweatshirts, shelled in olive-green bulletproof vests—had roughly pushed a woman to the ground. Pretti, attempting to help her up, had gotten a face full of pepper spray, then was dragged into the center of a circle of agents. One of the agents, discovering Pretti’s firearm—Minnesota is an open-carry state, provided you have a permit, which the Minneapolis police chief, Brian O’Hara, has said he did—takes it and ferries it away from the huddle. Soon another agent pulls out his own gun and starts the work of ending Pretti’s life. Just before he’s shot for the first time, Pretti still seems to be holding not a weapon, but his phone.

Almost every person I have spoken with over the past day can enumerate these details in minute and legalistic detail. In Pretti’s case and in Good’s, the proliferation of videos—of “angles”—has begun to blurrily expand what we mean by the words “witness” and “evidence.” People physically close to these brazen displays of brute, fatal force gather crucial seconds of visual proof, and then send them off, like messengers, into the digital world. Before long, all of us are pulled “close,” in a morbid, substitutionary way, to the site of disaster—closer than we’d like to be. It’s never been easier to paint and pass around a picture of a historic event.

The Trump Administration, still belligerently defensive of ICE’s operatives and authority, usually loves to play with pictures. They like to mess around with A.I. and turn its slop images into propaganda. They’ll turn Donald Trump into, say, the Pope, or J. D. Vance into a bearded guest star in the comic-strip world of “Dilbert.” Or they’ll employ the kitsch paintings of Thomas Kinkade to rewrite America as a glowing, homogenous, implicitly and eternally white place, situated in some placid pocket of the heart. Recently, the White House’s X account shared a distorted image of a Black woman named Nekima Levy Armstrong, who’d been arrested after protesting at a church in Minneapolis. In the doctored picture, she’s crying wildly. In reality, she stood with her hands cuffed behind her back, her face stoic. Maybe they figured that their supporters would love to see Levy like this: totally defeated, visibly abject after a quick scrape with the tough presence of the law.

But the existence of so many real and unvarnished images of Pretti’s killing posed a problem that Trump’s underlings have tried to patch up with words. Greg Bovino, the head of Border Patrol, claimed in an interview, on CNN Sunday morning, that Pretti had wanted to “massacre” law enforcement. “So, good job for our law enforcement in taking him down before he was able to do that,” he said. Kristi Noem, the Secretary of Homeland Security, declaimed that Pretti—manifestly nonviolent on the videos everybody has seen—was reacting “violently” in the moments before his death. Vance, who has become the Administration’s foremost spokesperson for justifying the deaths of innocents, reposted a picture of Pretti’s gun on X, coupling it with a plea for Minnesota’s political leadership to collaborate with ICE, so that “situations on the ground didn’t get out of hand.”

These were attempts at a kind of perverted art criticism, meant to offer ICE’s supporters a new way to parse the videos—a new “angle” on Pretti’s killing that could never be substantiated by their eyes. Our ability to participate in witnessing, to corroborate each other’s commonsense, to assure one another that, no, you are not crazy, they did just “fucking kill that guy,” is a threat to the Administration’s assumption of total power, not only over events but over how those events are interpreted and made into history. Their untroubled and automatic dishonesty, amid so much shared evidence, gives rise to a horrible question: If this is what they do when we can see, what’s going on in the places—planes and cars, detention centers—where we can’t? ♦

Emily Nussbaum on Jane Kramer’s “Founding Cadre”

2026-01-25 19:06:02

2026-01-25T11:00:00.000Z

In late 1969, Jane Kramer was back in Manhattan after a spell in Morocco with her husband, an anthropologist. In her absence, the sparks of second-wave feminism had ignited, in two forms: there were the liberals of NOW and also the radicals, whose colorful speak-outs were catnip to journalists. That fall, the Village Voice assigned the writer Vivian Gornick to skewer the “libbers,” but instead she wrote a rousing manifesto that ended with the mention of a new group—and a number to call if you wanted to join.

Kramer followed up, notebook in hand. The New Yorker, then led by William Shawn, was averse to polemical swashbuckling; it would never print a phone number as a kicker. But its writers could take their time. Kramer embedded with the Stanton-Anthony Brigade, the “founding cadre” of a set of revolutionary cells devoted to consciousness-raising, or C.R. She sat in as members shared intimate stories, seeking patterns of oppression and strategizing methods of resistance; she watched sisterhood blossom, then break down. By the time her piece came out, a year after Gornick’s, the brigade had dissolved, but the movement was thriving.

Kramer’s article, “Founding Cadre,” was an outlier for the period. It wasn’t a convert’s plea, like Gornick’s; or an insider’s dishy dispatch, like Susan Brownmiller’s movement roundup in the Times; or a bitingly confessional essay, like Sally Kempton’s “Cutting Loose,” in Esquire. But it wasn’t dismissive, either, like “The David Susskind Show.” Instead, it was icily observational, documenting the group’s rich, clashing perspectives in granular detail. There were pages of dialogue, as in a play, and long block quotes resembling monologues. The one thing the piece didn’t include was the women’s identities; the magazine concealed them with pseudonyms and radically altered identifying details. Even so, I could sort out who was who: “Hannah” was Shulamith Firestone, midway through writing “The Dialectic of Sex,” and “Barbara” was Anne Koedt, the author of “The Myth of the Vaginal Orgasm”; the others were Celestine Ware (“Margaret”), Martha Gershun (“Beatrice”), Diane Crothers (“Nina”), Minda Bikman (“Eve”), and Ann Snitow (“Jessica”).

Kramer’s piece is barely mentioned in histories of the era, and when I stumbled on it I was astonished: it was baggy, almost exhausting, at thirty thousand words, but full of wild spikes of insight and emotion. Like the recent play “Liberation,” it replicated the feeling of being inside a C.R. group, a sensation both grand and claustrophobic. In a typical scene, the cadre met in an East Village walkup and slid from idea to idea, lambasting romance novels, sharing awful tales of marital violence, then musing over who was “male-identifying”—aggressive, careerist. Freud and Marx came up; so did class and race. (Ware was the brigade’s sole Black member, but her race wasn’t mentioned, and, after hosting the first meeting, she quit to write a book.) Tenderness and cruelty overlapped. You can tell whom Kramer liked best.

In 1996, Kramer published a follow-up essay, “The Invisible Woman,” for a special issue on feminism commissioned by Tina Brown, the magazine’s editor at the time. The piece began with a mea culpa. In 1970, Kramer wrote, she had been deeply unsettled by her time in Morocco, where she’d seen a thirteen-year-old girl forcibly married off. She patronized the cadre’s radicals, pitying their singlehood and instability; newly pregnant, she was defensive, afraid that they viewed her as “a dreary housewife in flashy feminist clothes.” The pseudonyms hadn’t been her subjects’ idea, or her own: under Shawn, radical feminism had been viewed as akin to “an odd smell or a kinky preference—something too intimate, too embarrassing, to identify and expose.”

Even so, Kramer defended her methods: she’d let the women speak for themselves, in voices that proved powerful and prescient. Like Gornick, she was a convert. Five decades have only intensified the odd power of “Founding Cadre,” which captures, in its cool frame, the warm sound of women struggling, collectively, to create a revolution. “The Invisible Woman” now feels sadder, given its rosy ending—a celebration of Kramer’s daughter’s generation, which felt secure in the “sweet illusion” of the movement’s triumph. Kramer wrote, “It is hard, as a mother, not to want to see them keep that illusion for just a little longer.” ♦


Restaurant Review: Wild Cherry

2026-01-25 19:06:02

2026-01-25T11:00:00.000Z

Wild Cherry is an intimate, devastatingly glamorous restaurant set inside the lobby of the Cherry Lane Theatre, a famously scrappy West Village playhouse that was purchased, in 2023, by the indie-film production company A24. The new owners oversaw a top-to-toe upgrade of the century-old venue, sprucing up the seats and revamping the lobbies and bathrooms down to the tiniest detail. Wild Cherry, which is operated by the chef-restaurateurs Lee Hanson and Riad Nasr, of Frenchette and Le Veau d’Or, has taken up residence in a windowless space that was once a black-box theatre-within-the-theatre for showing experimental works.

The theme isn’t subtle: the restaurant is a clubby little boîte, gussied to the nines in haute-theatrical fashion, with fern-frond wallpaper, checkerboard floors, and marquee lights dotting a proscenium-shaped archway. The old-school pizzazz extends to the bottle-green leather of the banquettes; the way the barrel-vaulted ceiling grasps and releases the light fixtures’ glow; the fuzzy glimmer of a zinc-topped, U-shaped bar that takes up much of the room; the enormous, bathtub-like booths against opposite walls that call out to host a splashy, celebrity-adjacent dinner party. But something gleefully strange is detectable beneath all that greasepaint, something off-kilter that stays true to the purity and absurdity of live theatre and its lovers. This is evident in the pastiche quality of the menu, which features a bit of Italian American social club, a dash of Midwestern veterans’ lodge, an edge of Old New York ritziness, and—these are the Frenchette folks, after all—an indelible streak of French bistro.

The interior of Wild Cherry with green booths and a bar.
The interior’s haute-theatrical flourishes include fern-frond wallpaper, checkerboard floors, and marquee lights studding a proscenium-shaped archway.

This could have easily been chaos, but it reads as mere idiosyncrasy, thanks to the sheer force of Wild Cherry’s appeal as a place to while away a few stylish hours. The music is hopping (when was the last time you heard “Ca’-Ba’-Dab,” by the Soul Swingers, and why isn’t every restaurant playing it on a loop?), and the mood is as warm as the lighting, with affable servers and bar staff whose enthusiasm is infectious. The cocktails skew tiki—a quart-size scorpion bowl with your dinner?—but they’re great, well-balanced and cleverly composed, like a zero-proof piña colada that gets heft and depth from hojicha, or a sherry highball tarted up with amaro and a splash of cola.

The sense of both seriousness and play extends to the food. Among a selection of chilled seafood is a showpiece-y whole Dungeness crab served “à la russe,” with stripes of finely minced chives, capers, and sieved egg; and a gorgeous scungilli salad, the tender slices of conch laced with celery leaves in a punchy vinaigrette, and served piled into the creature’s giant, whorling shell. The approach, over all, is eclectic but committed: a brawny kielbasa, redolent of garlic and studded with melty Comté, sits atop a languid bed of sauerkraut; hunks of chermoula-painted monkfish are laced on skewers and served with a tapenade of olives and raisins. Frogs’ legs—which Hanson and Nasr catapulted back into fashion with a persillade version at Le Veau d’Or—are battered and fried like little chicken drumettes, then glossed in butter and spangled with herbs. The menu’s only pasta is fettuccine Alfredo, a dish so earnestly out of style that it becomes viciously cool again; the sauce, made the traditional way, from just butter, Parmigiano, and an emulsifying splash of pasta water, is tossed together tableside by a server, sending fine particles of cheese flying everywhere like a joyous puff of confetti. For a hundred and twenty dollars, you can get a steak dinner for two, which includes a substantial Denver-cut filet, a lovely green salad, and an audaciously retrograde baked potato, which is also available à la carte, and which I plan to order regularly, alone at the bar, with a dirty Martini, and maybe a slab of pineapple-and-coconut cake for dessert.

A bartender arranges a flower bouquet atop a large tikistyle beverage.
A tiki-leaning cocktail menu includes drinks like the quart-size Scorpion Bowl.
A persons hands are held out and one holds a salad inside a mollusk shell.
A scungilli salad is served inside the creature’s whorling shell.

Not all the oddness works. A lobster club sandwich was messy and too bread-forward, the sweetness of the meat overpowered by forcefully smoky rashers of bacon. A pair of chicken thighs served atop crispy frites—“thighs and fries,” the menu winks—is unremarkable, the meat underseasoned and encased in flabby skin. The fries, at least, are terrific, crisp and precise; they’re at their best eaten alongside the cheeseburger, which is maybe the star of the whole show, a standout even in a city overcrowded with fancy cheeseburgers. (This is no surprise, perhaps, given Hanson and Nasr’s role in creating the fabled Black Label burger for Minetta Tavern, way back when.) Its austere appearance—tidy, compact, no fripperies—belies a lascivious richness within: the beef is ground with marrow, the patty cooked to a yielding medium rare, the bun slicked with sauce choron, a béarnaise pinked up and slightly sweetened with a bit of tomato paste. Topped with a slice of cheddar and a few rounds of raw onion, it is served cut in half, which I’m sure will scandalize some purists, but it’s a thoughtful stroke of night-life engineering: a halved burger can be eaten with just one hand, so there’s no need to put down your drink.

A persons hands uses two fork to lift a bundle of fettuccine from a plate.
Fettuccine Alfredo is tossed tableside.

Apart from little boxes of popcorn presented as a bar snack, there doesn’t seem to be any obvious symbiosis between Wild Cherry and the theatre it inhabits, and, if you happen to arrive when a show is beginning or letting out, the shared lobby can feel like a bit of a free-for-all. But once you’re inside, past the red-velvet curtain, at the host's vestibule, it really is transportive, in part because the restaurant’s mood of affectionate self-regard feels tinged with an anticipatory haze of nostalgia. With all its meticulous art direction and scene-setting, its A24-inflected sense of constructed narrative, it seems designed to age into a faded, charismatic reminiscence of itself. Thirty or forty years from now, when there’s dust in the corners and mending marks on the banquettes and an aging-diva sheen of once-was hanging over it all, the place will be most fully itself. Right now, we’re dining in the memory of an old haunt that’s still brand-new. ♦



Trump’s Greenland Fiasco

2026-01-25 19:06:02

2026-01-25T11:00:00.000Z

In 1978, Václav Havel, the Czech playwright, dissident, and future President, wrote an essay, distributed clandestinely, that tells of a greengrocer who hangs a sign in his shopwindow reading “Workers of the World, Unite!” He doesn’t actually believe in this hollow slogan, nor do his customers—rather, they are all engaged in a performative ritual, a paean to a Communist system, which, through their act, they help perpetuate.

On January 20th, the Canadian Prime Minister, Mark Carney, recalled Havel’s essay at the World Economic Forum, in Davos, Switzerland, during a speech that, for one delivered by a head of state, offered a rare degree of intellectual, even emotional, candor. Carney applied the condition of Havel’s greengrocer to the rules-based international order that came into being after the Second World War, much of it backstopped by the United States and wielded to its benefit. Even as powerful countries regularly acted as they pleased and international laws and regulations were applied with “varying rigor,” a nominal allegiance to a world of norms and to win-win coöperation endured.

“American hegemony, in particular, helped provide public goods: open sea-lanes, a stable financial system, collective security, and support for frameworks for resolving disputes,” Carney said. And it undergirded NATO, an alliance that had allowed for an unprecedented near-century of peace. That order, however imperfect, had more benefit than downside. So, Carney said of Canada and its European allies, “we placed the sign in the window.”

But the first year of Donald Trump’s second term has made the downside impossible to ignore. Last April, on “Liberation Day,” Trump announced a twenty-per-cent tariff on E.U. members. (“They rip us off,” he said.) His attempts to end the war in Ukraine featured an unmistakable sympathy for Vladimir Putin, while indicating that the war is really Europe’s problem, anyway, and that it shouldn’t count on the U.S. for significant military or financial support. Just after New Year’s, when Trump sent U.S. troops to Venezuela to seize President Nicolás Maduro, he suggested that more such actions would follow, telling the Times, “I don’t need international law.”

Yet nothing has thrown the diverging paths of the U.S. and Europe into plain view more than the crisis over Greenland, an autonomous Arctic territory that is part of the Kingdom of Denmark. For the past year, Trump has said that he intended to take possession of the island, with its militarily strategic location and its abundant, if difficult-to-access, rare earths. Only the U.S. can defend Greenland from the likes of Russia and China, he argued, telling Congress, “We’re going to get it one way or the other.” That is, the signal member of NATO, a collective-security body based on the principles of mutual self-defense, was threatening to seize the territory of another member.

For a time, Denmark and other NATO members seemed to think that they could placate Trump with promises to devote more resources to the Arctic. (An agreement from 1951 allowed the U.S. to maintain military installations in Greenland during the Cold War—it now operates only one—with an option to add other facilities.) For the past year, in fact, Europe has shown a willingness to engage in flattery and transactional dealmaking—a proven formula with Trump. At a NATO summit in June, in The Hague, it largely worked; the main goal was to keep the U.S. in NATO, preserving its role and its capabilities. States pledged to spend five per cent of G.D.P. on defense, and Trump deemed the summit “tremendous.” But, on Greenland, he appeared to be operating in another realm. “You defend ownership,” Trump said in early January. “You don’t defend leases.”

Later in the month, Denmark and several other European countries sent troops to Greenland for military exercises—ostensibly to prove that they are serious about safeguarding it from adversaries like Russia and China, though clearly also to send a message to Trump. “The fact that Europe felt it had to deploy a trip-wire force against the one power that, for generations, was seen as providing the ultimate trip-wire force for Europe’s defense is a complete reversal of our entire understanding of the world,” Fabrice Pothier, a former director of policy planning at NATO, said. Trump responded by announcing additional tariffs—rising to twenty-five per cent—which would remain in force until a U.S. acquisition of Greenland was finalized.

Nonetheless, at Davos, speaking a day after Carney, Trump appeared to walk back his more dramatic threats, saying that the U.S. would not use force to take Greenland and tabling the tariffs. Perhaps the European troop exercises made an impression on him, or maybe an adviser explained the potential effect of the so-called E.U. trade bazooka—a set of wide-ranging countermeasures that European leaders, including Emmanuel Macron, were advocating—which could inflict a hundred billion dollars of losses on the U.S. economy.

That same day, Trump announced the “framework” of a deal brokered by the NATO secretary-general, Mark Rutte. Details were scarce, but it appears that the U.S. and Denmark will revisit the 1951 agreement, and may add more U.S. bases or missile-defense stations as part of what Trump calls his Golden Dome. An additional clause could keep adversarial powers from investing in or profiting from Greenland’s resources. In other words, Trump caused a crisis in NATO to end up with basically the same set of options that existed months ago.

If that deal sticks, Europe may be tempted to see Trump’s walk back as the ultimate geopolitical TACO move—the land grab that wasn’t. The larger problem, though, isn’t so much Trump’s proposed actions as the logic guiding them. As Ivo Daalder, the U.S. Ambassador to NATO from 2009 to 2013, said, “Trump has made clear he’s willing to defend territory he owns, and less than willing if he doesn’t.” That “sends a rather existential message to the rest of NATO about the notion that the security of one is indivisible from the security of all.”

No matter the ultimate resolution, the crisis will accelerate Europe’s efforts to decouple its security from the U.S. That is neither an easy nor a quick proposition: for example, Europe has no equivalent to the U.S.-made Patriot air-defense platform that it can produce at scale. Moreover, Europe itself is divided: it couldn’t agree on a response to Trump’s tariff threats, nor is there consensus on which nation should take the lead, if not the U.S.

Still, the dissolution of a decades-old order may be inevitable. “We are taking the sign out of the window,” Carney said, echoing Havel again, at Davos. The U.S. may be powerful and mighty, but its longtime allies “have something, too—the capacity to stop pretending, to name reality.” ♦

Tessa Hadley Reads “The Quiet House”

2026-01-25 19:06:02

2026-01-25T11:00:00.000Z

Listen and subscribe: Apple | Spotify | Wherever You Listen

Sign up to receive our weekly Books & Fiction newsletter.


Tessa Hadley reads her story “The Quiet House,” from the February 2, 2026, issue of the magazine. Hadley has published thirteen books of fiction, including the story collections “Bad Dreams” and “After the Funeral,” and the novella “The Party.” She won a Windham-Campbell Prize for fiction in 2016.