2026-10-03 02:30:28
Hello from Memphis, where we are currently hosting the 8th annual 12-hour Podcastathon. I’m here for the fourth straight year, along with Stephen Hackett, Myke Hurley, Kathy Campbell, Casey Liss, and Brad Dowdy. It will be guaranteed to be a fun watch.
Please drop in if you can.
2026-10-02 02:29:39
Amazon on Thursday announced new Kindles, including a new base model, Paperwhite, and Colorsoft. All three models come in multiple varieties (plastic and aluminum) and in a variety of new colors.
The cheapest model is $170 ($150 with ads), and the priciest new model is the $319 Colorsoft Signature Edition. (I admit that I find it somewhat shocking that even a basic e-reader costs $170 these days, but here we are.)
More notable, I think, is that Amazon is embracing page-turn buttons again—but with a very Amazon twist. After systematically removing page-turn buttons from its Kindles over the years, it’s brought them back—on a $80 case. Following in the steps of competitor Kobo, Amazon has also added a page-turn remote control for people who prefer to read while their device is not in their hands. (I know multiple people who place their e-readers in a stand and rely on page-turn clickers.)
I gotta say that I don’t love that Amazon has decided that to use page-turn buttons, you need to pay $80 and keep your Kindle in a case. But at least they’re finally offering an option. (For the record, Kobo’s Libra Colour is priced similarly to the Paperwhite Signature Edition and has buttons right on it, no case required. It’s the e-reader I use the most these days.)
Still, I must begrudgingly admit that Amazon has provided some much-needed page-turn options for people who don’t want to endlessly tap or swipe on a touchscreen. And over the last few years, Amazon has addressed many of the limitations of the Kindle software platform, making it much more competitive with Kobo. Given the outsized place Kindle has in the e-reader world, it’s good to see that someone at Amazon still cares about Kindle.
2026-10-01 20:30:16
ElevationLab has released an AirTag product I find appalling, and I strongly urge they immediately withdraw it from sale and recall all inventory. The AirTag Silencer is a simple device: remove the back panel and battery from an AirTag, position the Silencer’s highly engineered pin over the speaker, tap the pin with a hammer, and the AirTag’s speaker is destroyed. This prevents it from emitting an alert in three circumstances, only one of which is triggered by an owner. The other two scenarios aid stalkers and perpetrators of domestic violence, among others. I will not link to it.
Disabling an AirTag speaker is a way for an unwanted party to more easily track someone without their knowledge and consent. Apple designed the AirTag to alert people when an unknown tracker was moving with them (via software), or when a tracker moved or was bumped (via a sound) after remaining in a location for a period of time. The latter case is critical, as Find My items have been found in purses, luggage, vehicles, and other things that move, left there either provably or putatively by a party attempting to track someone otherwise unaware they’re under remote observation.
You can find sites selling AirTags with the speaker disabled all over the Internet, as well as instructions to do so, and some even state outright that the action helps with unwanted tracking. ElevationLab’s AirTag Silencer is certainly the only mainstream device that performs this task with the exacting design one has come to expect from the company since the introduction of their 2012 iPhone dock—now with the proviso of “unfortunately.”
I’ll take ElevationLab at their word that they intend this for use with, as the product description states, “Anything you wouldn’t want the speaker tipping off a thief. (We originally designed this for our own bikes that have been stolen).” This also guided their 5-year and 10-year AirTag cases, which can be secreted in a hard-to-remove location deep within something expensive.
It is true that the “moving with you” and audio alerts make an AirTag and similar items less ideal for recovering stolen items than for finding lost ones, tracking luggage in transit—or being alerted that you left something behind.
Eva Galperin, Director of Cybersecurity at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, was blunter than I. “Honestly, this is just another example of the mindset that things are more important than people,” she said via email. “There is a reason why the AirTag makes that noise, and it is because you cannot make a tracker that does not alert a thief without also making a person a tool for stalking. I think these people have, in fact, considered the implications and decided that they don’t care.”
I posed the question of potential misuse to Casey Hopkins, ElevationLab’s CEO. He replied via email, “We make products we want for ourselves. And we’ve had expensive bikes and other gear stolen and then recovered using AirTags. We have also silenced our own AirTags on those items using DIY methods available online and on YouTube. If someone is determined enough, they could already silence it themselves, but the person would still get phone notifications. With roughly 200 million AirTags in use, extreme edge cases will make news, but the overwhelming number of people just want to track their own gear.”
I see his point, but I don’t accept it, as the viewpoint is either naive or uninformed about the scale of abusive tracking. Yes, AirTags are used mostly for good purposes—my family must own 20 Find My items at this point—but there’s a difference between what a product might be used for and making a tool that expedites bad behavior, disabling both a component and a strategy created by Apple. Making it easy to remove the speaker also makes it simpler to engage in consent-free tracking—there are no two ways around it.
Apple’s Find My items and Google’s Find Hub trackers securely relay a signal from trackers through nearby iPhones, iPads, and Macs (Apple) and Android devices (Google), letting us keep tabs on our stuff and then potentially find it when it’s lost or stolen. The AirTag is a sword with two edges: one allows desired finding by yourself or others you share an item’s location with; the other, privacy-invading stalking, is often employed by those attempting to control someone, as part of ongoing domestic violence or stalking an acquaintance or stranger.
This isn’t speculative. You can find hundreds of newspaper articles and television reports about specific cases, and many write-ups of the broader problem. In New South Wales, Australia, a local commission on crime was able to compel retailers to provide information about who purchased tracking devices in 2023. Their analysis revealed one in four of the purchasers—about 750 of 3,000 people—”had a history of domestic violence, while a further 126 were apprehended violence order defendants at the time the items were purchased.” A lawsuit filed a few days ago in Oregon is the latest example.
The speaker is a primary component of the company’s anti-tracking strategy, so much so that the second-generation AirTag, released this year and replacing the original, emits a 50% louder sound. While that aids in finding stuff you’ve misplaced, it definitely increases the likelihood that a victim of stalking will hear an alert sound. Apple and Google, not notable collaborators, worked together in 2023 to release an anti-stalking proposal, which both companies have adopted, including audio alerts.
Apple originally had an AirTag (and third-party devices certified as Find My items) emit a sound when it was moved after three days in the same location. Advocates for victims of domestic violence and groups concerned with privacy urged a shorter time period. Apple updated the alert, just a few months after the product’s 2021 release, to trigger at a shorter and random interval. Since mid-2021, an AirTag or any Find My item chirps when moved between 8 and 24 hours after its paired device was last within Bluetooth range; the randomness makes it harder for a tracking party to predict when it might make a sound.
If you have an iPhone, iPad, or Android device and an Apple or Google tracker moves with you for a short period of time, your device will alert you and provide a map of where you’ve been tracked so far. This also lets you play a sound on the tracker device—something that’s not possible if the speaker has been removed.
Not being a lawyer, I can’t argue whether or not ElevationLab’s product comes with liability. However, using an AirTag, Find My item, or Google Find Hub tracker to acquire the location of someone without their permission may be a crime or risk a lawsuit, depending on the jurisdiction.
There are different ways to disable an AirTag or other tracker you discover, typically by rotating the back case and removing its battery. EFF’s Galperin has more direct advice: “I think that encouraging people to hit their AirTags with a hammer is a fine idea. They may need to hit it several times.”
I’ve been purchasing products from ElevationLab since their 2012 ElevationDock. The company has always had an eye for elegance coupled with problem-solving.
This is what makes the company’s AirTag Silencer an absolutely baffling misfire, something that you would have thought would have called out as enabling behavior by some customers that no company would want to be associated with.
ElevationLab can’t prevent speaker-removing hardware from being sold or instructions from being disseminated. But the company should not be producing a case-hardened steel piece of precision goods that may look like a pin, but is a razor-sharp double-edged sword. Pull this product from sale.
2026-10-01 11:46:04
Apple has become one of the world’s most valuable companies because of its products: the Mac, the iPad, the Apple Watch and most especially the iPhone. But the company’s product sales have been aided over the past 25 years by the presence of its iconic brand in more than 500 retail stores scattered across 27 countries and regions. Anyone who has ducked into an Apple store for a new iPhone or toted a broken Mac through the mall for a repair appointment at the Genius Bar has experienced what Steve Jobs and Ron Johnson built.
In “Shop Different: How Retail Revealed Apple’s Genius,” Mr. Johnson details the remarkable story of how, in 1999, Jobs recruited him from Target to join Apple as head of retail and launch perhaps the biggest long shot of Jobs’s entire tenure as chief executive. At a time when computer stores were a moribund category and Apple’s brand was near its lowest ebb, the two men concocted a daring strategy: find some way to connect with the millions of consumers who had no interest in or understanding of Apple’s products.
2026-10-01 01:51:00
Minor bugs that drive us mad, app blasts from the past, smart home infrastructure, and our non-car navigation systems.
2026-09-30 21:09:13
When Apple updated its iWork suite in April of last year, I complained that the company didn’t break out the full list of functions that it had added to Numbers in its 14.4 release. Subsequently, a reader did the legwork of digging into the Wayback machine to identify the additions.
Well, this week, Apple updated iWork again, including new functions for Numbers, and glory be—this time it did provide a full list of all the new functions available in the release notes. Can I hope that I played a part in this change? I’ll take it.
Of those new functions, it’s the additions of XOR (exclusive or) and DAYS (returning a number of days between two dates) that I’ll likely find the most helpful, though there are a bunch of statistical functions in there as well. I’d still love to see a MEDIANIF, alas. Maybe someday!
