MoreRSS

site iconSeth GodinModify

Coordinator of The Carbon Almanac. Founder of Akimbo, home of the altMBA. Author of THE PRACTICE and THIS IS MARKETING.
Please copy the RSS to your reader, or quickly subscribe to:

Inoreader Feedly Follow Feedbin Local Reader

Rss preview of Blog of Seth Godin

The hustle loop

2025-09-03 17:03:00

When we fall behind, it’s tempting to hustle to catch up.

When the competition heats up, it’s imperative we hustle to get ahead.

Hustle is a particular kind of shortcut. Hustle is pushing the boundaries of cultural expectation, creating pressure and discomfort to make a sale. Hustle pushes us to cut corners, cut the line and cut down trust.

And it quickly becomes the new normal. Hustling is a race to the bottom, and our competitors lean and hustle in response… which means that we’re now under pressure to hustle more than we think is appropriate, driven by the same forces that led us to hustle in the first place.

The alternative is to lean into better. To find the space and the guts to do breakthrough work, work that others are afraid to do. Instead of causing discomfort and cutting, we’re building something worth following and talking about.

Of course it’s not easy, that’s why it works.


PS A breath of fresh air, Dr. Natalie Nixon’s new book is out.

Bringing goodwill to the conversation

2025-09-02 17:03:00

Education is distinct from learning. Organized education is a form of indoctrination and certification. Sometimes it leads to learning, but not always.

You can win at education by figuring out what’s on the test (or what the boss wants) and parroting it back. In fact, that’s the easiest way to do so.

Learning is an argument, a conversation designed to change minds. Learning happens long after we leave organized schooling, and it requires emotional enrollment. We’re more likely to learn when we bring a desire to be transformed and to leave our previous assumptions behind.

Amplified by social media, there’s a rising tide of arguments that purport to be learning that actually lead nowhere. That’s because the participants are seeking to score points and gain attention, not to enroll in a mutual process of transformation and learning.

What does goodwill look like?

Be prepared (or better yet, eager) to change your mind.

All claims should be verifiable.

All assertions should be falsifiable.

Do the reading.

Show your work.

Reveal your actual agenda.

Understand the systems and mechanics at work, don’t simply quote them.

Assume goodwill on the part of others.

Don’t judge an argument by how comfortable its conclusion feels.

Question your own expertise. “I don’t know” is a complete sentence.

Engage with the strongest version of opposing views.

Embrace that “not yet” is different from “never.”

Celebrate your errors and welcome correction gracefully.

Ask helpful questions that support an alternative view before deciding.

Agree on the rules in advance and then honor them.

Focus on understanding before seeking to be understood.

Identify the ideas you are attached to and temporarily set them aside.

Change your mind. That’s why you’re here.


[More riffs on learning as many of us go back to school.]

Walk away or dance

2025-09-01 17:03:00

AI and LLMs pose a particularly visceral threat to the typing class. Writers, editors, poets, freelancers, marketing copywriters and others are voicing reasonable (and unreasonable) objections to the pace and impact of tools like Claude, Kimi and ChatGPT.

I think we have two choices, particularly poignant on US Labor Day…

The first is to walk away from the tools. You’re probably not going to persuade your competitors and your clients to have as much animosity for AI automation as you do, and time spent ranting about it is time wasted. But, you can walk away. There’s a long history of creative professionals refusing to use the technology of the moment and thriving.

If you’re going to walk away, the path is clear. Your work has to become more unpredictable, more human and more nuanced. It has to cost more and be worth more. It turns out that the pace of your production isn’t as important as its impact. Writing a hand-built Linkedin post that gets 200 comments isn’t a productive path in a world where anyone can do that. If we’re going to put ourselves on the hook, we need to really be on the hook.

Remember the mall photographers who took slightly better than mediocre photos of kids at Sears? They’re gone now, because we can take slightly better than mediocre photos at home.

The other option is to dance. Outsource all relevant tasks to an AI to put yourself on the hook for judgment, taste and decision-making instead. Give yourself a promotion, becoming the arbiter and the publisher, not the ink-stained wretch. Dramatically increase your pace and your output, and create work that scares you.

This requires re-investing the time you used to spend on tasks. Focus on mastering the tools, bringing more insight to their use than others. Refuse to publish mediocre work.

It’s tempting to fear AI slop, because it’s here and it’s going to get worse. But there’s human slop all over the internet, and it’s getting worse as well.

Whether you dance or walk away, the goal is the same: create real value for the people who need it. Do work that matters for people who care.

If we’re going to make a difference, we’ll need to bring labor to the work. The emotional labor of judgment, insight and risk.

Possibility vs. certainty

2025-08-31 17:03:00

It is impossible to make a perpetual motion machine, you’ll waste your time if you try.

It is possible to write a book of poetry that will sell 10 million copies.

It is unlikely, it probably won’t happen, but it is possible.

Science and innovation and creativity engage with the possible. Possible means “might.” It takes persistence to stick it out when we’re not sure.

Once certainty arrives, it becomes an engineering problem.

After the first fusion reactor is shown to work at any scale, we’ll know it can be done. Now the hard work is simply making it work better. Most organizations do this sort of work. Chipping, filing, refining.

Before you get to work, it’s worth deciding which hat you’re being asked to wear… pursuing the possible or optimizing the certain.

Food bonus post

2025-08-31 02:35:00

It’s been awhile…

Coconut Cult is a new sort of probiotic magic that’s actually delicious (the chocolate is great, the strawberry is magnificent). A tablespoon a day, try it for a week. You have 38 trillion gut bacteria (!) so you might as well make them happy.

This is the best gluten-free ramen I’ve ever had.

Peanut butter is more than a staple. The best I’ve had is only in the UK, the second-best is homemade. This is the third best, which is so much better than all the other options, I needed to share. You can probably find it locally, or buy a case from Zingermans.

I’m really enjoying the new botanicals and herbal teas from Rishi. And the Jimmy Nardello flakes from Burlap & Barrel. And Le Grand pesto is my favorite vegan pesto–but not easy to find.

And, by request, the homemade honey-oatmeal vodka recipe, as well as a breakthrough on my homemade dosa.

PS Two years later, this is still my favorite rice cooker.

Brittle systems

2025-08-30 17:03:00

Large organizations are purpose-built to do what they do, under prevailing conditions.

People are hired, assets are acquired, measurements are put in place–all to optimize what’s happening right here and right now.

In 1929, 200 million telegrams were sent. The wiring, technology, staffing, real estate holdings and marketing of Western Union were all optimized around delivering these telegrams profitably and with quality.

By most external measures, it was working, brilliantly. There weren’t too many things you could do to make the telegram system dramatically better.

When the change agent appears, the optimized organization stumbles. It takes heroic work to shift it for a new reality. Short-run efficiency rarely aligns with long-term resilience.

More often than not, it’s the insurgent that takes the lead. All they need to do is optimize for the new reality, they can skip the part about restructuring what they already have.

This is sort of obvious, but worth saying out loud. And while these shifts used to take decades, now they happen far more quickly. It hardly pays to be the dominant maker of fax machines in 2025.

If you’re an insurgent with a small team and fixed asset base, be on the hunt for a change agent that is going to swamp existing systems. When the change comes, you’re ready for new rules and the competition is hoping for stability.

And if you’re part of a dominant incumbent organization, perhaps it’s time to start looking for a new gig instead of hoping to wait out the shift. Because the new normal is rarely a return to the old normal.