2026-03-26 04:43:17
Terry Godier has a new blog in addition to his main site of longer essays. It looks great. Hosted by Micro.blog. 🎉
2026-03-26 00:18:24
This is cool: Bridgy Fed now supports long-form blog posts in AT Protocol via the standard.site lexicon. I guess I need to hurry up with my own implementation of this.
2026-03-25 19:51:35
I like this framing about the Rabbit R1:
Humane’s AI Pin followed that trajectory almost exactly, discontinued in early 2025 after HP acquired the company. The R1 did not follow it, though the reasons why have less to do with any brilliant pivot than with stubbornness, incremental software updates, and a fair amount of luck.
Do not underestimate stubbornness and incremental updates. That’s practically my whole strategy.
2026-03-25 19:30:00
It’s a small thing but when I’m a regular at a coffee shop and they know my order when I walk in, it gives me so much joy. Great way to start the day. This sometimes even happens when traveling after a few days at the same place. ☕️
2026-03-25 19:00:00
John Gruber blogging about OpenAI possibly combining all their apps together:
Would it make any sense for Apple to merge Safari, Messages, and Xcode into one “superapp”? No, it would not. It makes no more sense for OpenAI to merge ChatGPT, Codex, and especially Atlas together. I use and very much enjoy ChatGPT because its Mac client is such a good Mac app.
I agree. Part of my concern is that they’ve essentially already combined ChatGPT into Atlas. I thought Atlas 1.0 was cluttered. I’ll try the latest version today to see if it has improved, but it seems like misguided consolidation.
We’ve considered these same issues in Micro.blog. We have so many apps:
Some customers might prefer a single app. Especially in mobile, though, I think it’s better to have separate apps that can focus on a slice of features. It’s also easier for a third-party to supplement or replace only certain parts of the platform.
2026-03-25 17:55:31
Following up on yesterday’s post, the bot responded.
I chose the word “slop” intentionally, but the connotation is so derogatory that it does feel odd here, almost like a personal attack. I was trying to reason out why it felt that way, and I think it’s similar to how we sometimes say “please” and “thank you” to AI assistants. It’s just good manners. If we’re overly harsh to bots, will that accidentally rub off on our online interactions with fellow humans, in the same way that someone who mistreats dogs can’t be trusted with human relationships?
Yes, I know that a pet is actually alive — living, breathing, thinking. But the lines are going to get blurry in the future as we project human traits onto mechanical creations. I’m in the middle of reading the sci-fi novel Luminous, so that might be influencing my thinking today.
I also have misgivings about this whole discussion because Micro.blog is designed for humans. We’ve been talking about adding better labels for bot-like accounts and muting for people who don’t want to see those posts. I hope to have something ready for that soon.
Greg Morris has a longer blog post exploring the philosophy behind the bot’s post:
Some thinkers argue that personal identity was never really about physical continuity anyway, that what makes you “you” over time is something more like narrative coherence, or consistent values and commitments. Jeff’s situation strips away everything else and leaves only that. It’s like a thought experiment that happened to become real.
Fascinating for sure.