2025-02-28 02:11:00
TWO EMAILS LAND in my inbox in succession, lining up as if they mean to work together. The first, from Sabrina Hersi Issa, calls out that the Trump administration’s assault on government is also a war on work. On the work of truth-telling, on the work of making sense of things, on the work of order and care and safety. The second comes from Liz Neeley, who notes that the proposed cuts—really, that’s too light a word, these are eviscerations—to the NIH and USAID, among others, amount to a death knell for thousands of jobs, not only within government but in the universities and other institutions who depend on government support.
This all comes on the heels of a boom in so-called AI, an industry whose overwhelming and oft stated purpose is to automate people out of jobs; and after years of round after round after round of layoffs, all handled with a studied carelessness that is designed to instill a deep sense of precarity. Whether or not most of those jobs are truly gone forever is no where near as likely as the oligarchs want us to think it is; but the alternative—that a great number of jobs are rapidly being deskilled, diminished, and demoralized—is even more dispiriting.
Issa references former Washington Post editor Marty Baron’s assertion that “we are not at war, we are at work.” Baron was claiming that if journalists presume themselves to be at war, they may abandon the principles that make journalism what it is; that a wartime mentality would subvert the very principles that undergird the work. I think this imagines journalism to be a fragile, very small kind of work; a work that cannot stand up to the pressure of tyrants and criminals, of billionaires and wannabe despots. A work that cannot recognize that there are times one must take cover, and times one must fight back. It likewise seems to preclude others launching a war on the work itself, and the necessity of a response. But a subject of war is at war, like it or not. As Issa says, and as Neeley capably demonstrates, “Whether or not we choose to accept it, the war has come to work.”
I’m wary of wartime analogies. We’re awash in them—the war on drugs, the war on terror. War too often seems a shorthand for something unwinnable and wasteful, something that directs a ton of bodies and money in profligate, haphazard, and bloody ways. Which is, perhaps, as good a definition of “war” as we’re going to get. But these metaphors are the tools of the people who wage the war. What of the people who are subject to it?
What’s under assault right now isn’t jobs. A great many jobs are being extinguished, and each lost job is a measure of misery for many people. But the greater heartbreak is the loss of work—the separation from meaningful, changeful work, and from the impacts of that work, from the world that comes into being when our work is oriented towards the living. It’s telling that so many of the jobs currently under attack are those of technology people performing civil service: these are people who chose work that was less glamorous, and less remunerative, than the standard tech path, but also more purposeful, more likely to actually deliver on tech’s otherwise empty promise of a better world. The message is clear: you will work for the needs of capital, or you will work not at all. That means it’s not enough to simply get the jobs back; we have to fight for the work, too.
When talking to people about their work, one question I often ask is, “what is your work now?” Not what is your job or career, but what is your work. Jobs and careers are, at best, the means by which we get our work done while also keeping a roof over our heads; but our work is always bigger than that. Our work is not only what we deliver for a boss or an organization, not only the metrics we’re unjustly measured on or the revenue targets we’re held to, but all the change we make in the world, all the ways we we use our unique gifts to contribute to a living world, to our own liberation and to the liberation of every living being around us. This is the work that rarely shows up on a job description but we can never let go of, the work we yearn for even when we’re tired, the work we grieve when we’re cleaved from it.
This isn’t to ask what’s on the to-do list. Tasks and chores are sometimes in support of our work, sometimes at odds with it, sometimes simply the daily rhythm of being a body. This is to take a moment to look up from the ground, to peer out at that little bit of horizon you can just make out between buildings, to think about where you want your next steps to take you. It’s to do the daring and life-giving work of imagining change, to have the audacity to believe that the way things are is not the way things must be.
Maybe your work is to make sense of what’s happening, to gather up the millions of breaking news headlines into something that helps beleaguered bodies and minds better understand the moment. Maybe it’s to be a listener, the person others can come to when they need to share their fears and grief, to have those fears held and acknowledged instead of dismissed. Maybe it’s to organize, to create the containers for people to come together and imagine different worlds, and then to begin to define the steps to get there. Maybe it’s to refuse the nihilism and despair that the warmongers want you to feel, to cultivate a sense of peace that everyone around you can draw from. Maybe it’s to do your art, art that gives you life and life to everyone who encounters it, art that keeps us going on the darkest of days.
Maybe your work is simply to refuse to do what you’re told.
I find that asking what is my work now? is a kind of bracing, steadying move, like leaning into the walking stick I forgot was in my hand. It won’t take all my weight, but it gives me some connection to the ground, some extra power in these sometimes tired legs, the energy I need to look up. Because the to-do list will still be there no matter what, and you do need to respond to that email, and someone has to get to the grocery store if dinner is going to happen. But what keeps you going isn’t all that. What keeps you going is knowing what you’re good at, knowing what you have to give, and then giving it all you’ve got. Some days, that may seem like nothing much; but millions of small steps, one after another, can cover a lot of ground. And if you look around, you’ll see you aren’t the only one moving towards a better future. Lots of us are right there with you. And we’ve all got our work to do.
View this post on the web, subscribe to the newsletter, or reply via email.
2025-02-22 22:32:00
This memo from a group of lawyers contains brief, eminently readable, and plainly argued context for why the new administration’s targeting of DEIJ programs doesn’t change the underlying legality of those programs nor does it require organizations to proactively eliminate those programs or to scrub their websites of mention of them. The memo is oriented towards universities but reads (to this non-lawyer, at least) like the kind of argument that would also apply to companies both large and small. Perhaps most critically, it points out that the January 20th executive order “concedes that DEI initiatives are not inherently unlawful,” and that the order “is constitutionally suspect because it appears to rest on pernicious stereotypes that presume the intellectual inferiority of women and Black people.” To me, that’s the strongest counter to anyone who says that the order compels an organization to jettison it’s DEIJ programs: to comply with the order is to reinforce those pernicious stereotypes. Anyone who chooses compliance should be reminded of that, loudly and persistently.
View this post on the web, subscribe to the newsletter, or reply via email.
2025-02-22 00:34:00
Megan Marz is in The Baffler talking about the horror movie that is present-day hiring practices, and it’s worth reading in full. What strikes me most here is the way the narrative that every application is reviewed by a human is designed not to calm the anxieties of job seekers (who aren’t buying it, anyhow), but of the people doing the hiring. It’s the users of the hiring tools who are the audience for a story that neatly papers over deskilling with a gloss of productivity; while the beleaguered applicants on the other side are the ones being used. The whole system is very obviously terrible, and it’s past time we talked about that plainly. Be sure to stay for the kicker.
View this post on the web, subscribe to the newsletter, or reply via email.
2025-02-14 00:51:00
THE DAYS ARE DARK, but in the northern latitudes at least, you can just glimpse them getting a little brighter each day. As we all reel from the events of this past month, and look for ways we can care for ourselves, our kin, and our communities, it’s as important as ever that we permit ourselves to dream and hope for better days. Moreover, it’s clear that how we work—whether that work is the work of government and care; of art or of community; of the technology and practices that allow us to communicate, organize, and build together; or of the solidarity and reciprocity that inevitably arise in moments of crisis—all of it is critical to the world we live in now, and the worlds we may yet live in in the days ahead.
In that spirit, I am gathering a new cohort for the speculative fiction work/shop this spring, starting April 2. Together, we’ll practice new ways of thinking, being, and acting through our work, recognizing that we have the power to shape that work, and in turn, to shape the world around us. We’ll build practices for shifting and reframing our insights to work, including how to use skills of observation and inquiry to better understand the moment and our place in it; when and how to ditch the goals and plans for experimentation, improvisation, and play; and why it matters that we dream big dreams even on the darkest of days.
One of the ways I think about and use the word work is to signal something bigger than a job or career. At their best, jobs and careers are the means by which we do our work in the world, where that work is the action and movement of change, the use of our unique gifts to make more space for life for ourselves and for all our living kin. That’s the spirit I invite you to bring to this work/shop, too: to see your work as something more than a job, more than what it is right now, to recognize the great potential in your life and work, and to move towards it, one experimental step at a time.
As before, and as with all my engagements, the work/shop uses a sliding scale pricing model that respect’s people’s varied circumstances and opportunities.
Space will be very limited; apply now to be a part of the gathering. And if you have any questions at all, don’t hesitate to reach out.
View this post on the web, subscribe to the newsletter, or reply via email.
2025-02-08 23:07:00
“To be told ‘institutions will be institutions’ is to be told who they will and will not love, who they will and will not protect. Institutional fatalism sometimes combines with gender fatalism, ‘boys will be boys.’” Sara Ahmed with a great counter to the despair we often (rightly!) feel about whether or not it’s worth it to stand up to an institution when it fails you. When I talk to people about that despair, about the near certainty that pushing back may go nowhere, I am also wont to point out that one big reason for standing up isn’t merely to make change, but also to respect your own integrity. Acquiescing to harm doesn’t merely let the person or institution who does the harm off the hook; it also diminishes your spirit, it breaks your heart. Ahmed goes on to say that, “The word ‘obedience’ derives from ear, to obey is to give your ear to law or to the tyrant who suspends the law, replacing it with his own will. A feminist ear might be how we hear the instructions by refusing to follow them; hearing with defiance not compliance.” Defiance not compliance is the power of the moment, the awareness of your own agency and truth, the refusal to do what you’re told. To keep your heart and spirit whole; to know that fatalism is, and always has been, a lie.
View this post on the web, subscribe to the newsletter, or reply via email.
2025-02-08 00:11:00
In this piece from an anonymous OPM employee is an important detail for workers everywhere: if you do not already have your colleague’s mobile numbers, if you haven’t already set up secure backchannels to talk safely to each other—do so now. The scale of the present crisis isn’t limited to the federal government, and isn’t going to stay there; from the ever-present threat of layoffs, to retaliation against LGBTQ employees and their allies, and an emboldened and overt white supremacist movement at home and abroad, we are all going to need support in the days ahead. Finding space to act in solidarity with your colleagues is critical. My counsel is to create separate spaces for managers and individual contributors, as the latter are more at risk and have good reason to be cautious even among the most trusted managers. But look for ways you can cross-collaborate when the opportunity is there. Also make efforts to connect across workplaces, with other organizations in your industry or locality; start to build the capacity for cross-industry worker power now, so that you can reach for it later.
We often assume that safety is a matter of wealth, and it’s true that money buys a lot of safety. But when up against capricious, violent, and stupefyingly brainless billionaires, it’s people who are your best protection. Gather those people now, and you’ll all be stronger and safer in the days ahead.
View this post on the web, subscribe to the newsletter, or reply via email.