2026-03-03 21:02:14
Welcome to the Premium edition of How They Make Money.
Over 300,000 subscribers turn to us for business and investment insights.
In case you missed it:
If you are experiencing a severe case of déjà vu, don’t worry.
Just a few weeks ago, we were breaking down the seismic $83 billion deal that was supposed to turn Netflix into the ultimate entertainment conglomerate. We analyzed the spin-offs, incoming regulatory steps, and the future of Warner Bros. without the cable anchor. It felt like a done deal.
As of today, that deal is officially dead.
In a move straight out of a prestige HBO drama, Paramount Skydance hiked its bid to $31 per share in cash to swallow the entire company, including its linear channels and massive debt.
On the same day, Netflix co-CEOs Ted Sarandos and Greg Peters officially walked away, refusing to engage in a bidding war.
It’s a total reversal for the industry.
Netflix wanted to cherry-pick the IP and leave the legacy TV business behind.
Paramount is doubling down on the old-school studio model, embracing the linear bundle, and promising a theatrical-first future.
Today, we’re unpacking the new $111 billion acquisition. We’ll look at the massive debt pile, the $7 billion regulatory insurance policy, and why this shotgun wedding has California’s Attorney General reaching for his briefcase.
Let’s unpack the deal, the drama, and the data.
Today at a glance:
Why Netflix Walked
What Para+Warner Looks Like
Eye-popping Leverage
Regulatory Gauntlet
Winners & Losers (updated)
Netflix officially pulled the plug right after WBD’s board declared Paramount’s $111 billion bid a “superior proposal” on February 26. The company ultimately chose its balance sheet over a bidding war.
In a joint statement, Sarandos and Peters candidly explained:
“We’ve always been disciplined, and at the price required to match Paramount Skydance’s latest offer, the deal is no longer financially attractive. This was always a ‘nice to have’ at the right price, not a ‘must have’ at any price.”
The gap between the two offers was not only about value, but also about the nature of the deal. Netflix was only interested in the clean assets (Studios and HBO Max), requiring a complex spin-off of the declining linear networks into Discovery Global.
David Ellison, backed by his billionaire father Larry, made it easy for WBD’s board. They took everything. For WBD management, a clean cash exit at $31/share was simply too good to pass up compared to the messy, tax-intensive spin-off Netflix required.
Netflix investors cheered the move. The stock jumped 14% immediately after the announcement. By walking away, Netflix avoids the winner’s curse of overpaying for no-growth assets.
While Paramount inherits a mountain of debt, Netflix walks away with its balance sheet intact and a $2.8 billion cash consolation prize. This break-up fee was immediately paid by Paramount to Netflix to clear the board.
What happens when two debt-heavy media companies facing structural decline merge? Let’s take an educated guess.
Paramount is buying the entire house, creating a media colossus that looks more like a 20th-century conglomerate than a 21st-century tech platform.
Let’s visualize the two companies:
3 similar segments:
📺 Linear TV: The lion’s share of revenue & profit, but declining.
🎥 Studios: Hit or miss based on new theatrical releases.
📱 Streaming: Slow-growing and low-margin for now.
Over 211 million direct-to-consumer (DTC) subscribers:
HBO Max & Discovery+: 132 million (+13% Y/Y).
Paramount+ 79 million (+4% Y/Y).
~$96 billion in net debt. This includes $39 billion in combined net debt as of December, $54 billion in new debt commitments, and the $2.8 billion breakup fee paid to Netflix. While Paramount claims a $79 billion pro forma net debt figure, that likely reflects creative accounting and aggressive exclusions.
Under $12 billion in adjusted EBITDA in FY25:
WBD: $8.7 billion, slowly declining in the past two years.
PSKY: $2.7 billion (with a $3.8 billion outlook for FY26).
In their official merger announcement, Paramount asked for a leap of faith.
Paramount is asking investors to trade on a 4x leverage hypothetical future while living in an 8x leverage present. The bridge between those two numbers starts with a staggering $6 billion in promised synergies. In an industry where integration is notoriously messy, it’s a high-stakes bet.
Are we supposed to believe EBITDA will leap from less than $12 billion to more than $20 billion while the core profit centers (linear networks) are in a freefall?
WBD and Paramount combined for ~$15 billion in SG&A expenses last year. In an industry with iron-clad union contracts and massive marketing requirements, cutting ~40% of overhead is a bold claim.
Netflix, the masters of tech efficiency, believed it could only find $2.5 billion in savings. Paramount is claiming it can find $6 billion. This $3.5 billion gap has our BS-meter working overtime.
It’s possible management is double-counting synergies across Paramount Skydance and the WBD merger. Warner has already been restructured multiple times and ultimately chose to sell itself. Finding another massive round of savings won’t be easy.
How many times can you make an organization leaner before something breaks?
To justify the debt mountain, Paramount is pitching a very specific vision of the future.
2026-03-01 23:02:36
Welcome to the Premium edition of How They Make Money.
Over 300,000 subscribers turn to us for business and investment insights.
🔥 The February report is here, with over 100 businesses visualized!
All the key earnings from the past month in one report.
✔️ Cut through the noise with clear, concise financial snapshots.
✔️ See revenue trends, profit margins, and key takeaways instantly.
Download the full report below or log in to your account.
Here’s a sneak peek. 👀
What to expect in our monthly report?
Hyperscalers: Google, Amazon.
Hardware: HP, Lenovo, Samsung.
Infrastructure: Arista, Cisco, Dell, Palo Alto.
Chip Design: NVIDIA, AMD, ARM, Qualcomm.
Crypto: Circle, Coinbase, Robinhood.
Gig Economy: Uber, DoorDash, Airbnb, Grab, Instacart.
Payments: Adyen, PayPal, Block, Nu, Klarna, Affirm, Toast.
Global Commerce: MercadoLibre, Coupang, Shopify, Global-e.
Cybersecurity: Cloudflare, Zscaler, Fortinet.
Productivity: HubSpot, Zoom, Monday, Intuit.
Data & AI: Palantir, Snowflake, Datadog, Elastic.
Software Stack: Salesforce, Workday, Atlassian.
FMCG: Hershey, Kraft, Mondelēz.
Luxury: Hermès, Kering, L’Oréal, Ferrari.
Buffett Basket: Berkshire, Coca-Cola, Moody’s.
Retail & Apparel: Walmart, Amer Sports, Birkenstock.
Sports betting: DraftKings, Flutter.
Gaming: Roblox, Nintendo, Sony, Take-Two.
Streaming: Disney, Warner, Paramount, Roku.
Social & Ads: Reddit, Snap, Spotify, The Trade Desk, Applovin.
2026-02-28 23:01:46
Welcome to the Saturday PRO edition of How They Make Money.
Over 300,000 subscribers turn to us for business and investment insights.
In case you missed it:
📊 Monthly reports: 200+ companies visualized.
📩 Tuesday articles: Exclusive deep dives and insights.
📚 Access to our archive: Hundreds of business breakdowns.
📩 Saturday PRO reports: Timely insights on the latest earnings.
Today at a glance:
☁️ Salesforce: AI Anxiety
✅ Intuit: Scaling the AI-Native ERP
🧠 Synopsys: Power of Integration
💻 Dell: AI Supercycle Accelerates
🏦 Nubank: AI Credit Engine
❄️ Snowflake: AI Adoption Accelerates
☁️ CoreWeave: Infrastructure Gamble
🏗️ Autodesk: Agentic AI Transformation
🇰🇷 Coupang: Cyberattack Aftermath
🔲 Block: Intelligence-Native Pivot
🖥️ Zoom: $5 Billion Milestone
☁️ Zscaler: Metered Usage Pivot
🪙 Circle: Stable Haven
⚡️ Celsius: Still a Monster
🏈 Flutter: Blaming Boring NFL
📺 The Trade Desk: Soft Guide
☁️ Nutanix: AMD Strategic Alliance
💳 Chime: Profitability Inflection
🔍 Elastic: AI Context Engine
🦉 Duolingo: Growth Fizzles
🧑⚕️ Teladoc: Strategic Pivot
Salesforce closed out FY26 with a massive bottom-line beat and a record backlog, but the stock slipped in after-hours trading as AI fears continue to weigh on the software sector. Q4 revenue (January quarter) rose 12% Y/Yto $11.2 billion (in line with consensus), while non-GAAP EPS came in at $3.81 ($0.76 beat).
That revenue growth looks healthy at first, but organic revenue growth was actually just 8% Y/Y once you adjust for the recent Informatica acquisition. Revenue from Informatica was added to the ‘Platform, Slack & Other’ segment.
The company’s Remaining Performance Obligation (RPO) accelerated 14% Y/Y to $72.4 billion. Current RPO (next 12 months) grew 13% in constant currency to $35.1 billion (helped by a 4-point contribution from Informatica).
Adjusted operating margin improved by 1.1pp to 34.2%, and management rewarded shareholders by hiking the dividend 6% and authorizing a massive new $50 billion share repurchase program, showing how the board feels about the share price.
CEO Marc Benioff aggressively pushed the company’s Agentic Enterprise narrative. Agentforce Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) surged 169% Y/Y to $800 million. To prove AI is doing real work, Salesforce introduced a new metric called Agentic Work Units (AWU), noting 2.4 billion tasks have been completed by autonomous agents to date. Benioff raised the company’s FY30 revenue target by $3 billion to $63 billion, though this can be attributed to Informatica rather than AI.
The market’s anxiety over AI disruption overshadowed the results. Salesforce’s FY27 revenue guidance of 10% to 11% growth translates into 7% to 8% Y/Y if you remove the impact of Informatica. This continued slowdown implied that while AI ARR momentum is undeniable, it might be at the expense of the rest of the business.
Intuit’s Q2 FY26 (January quarter) revenue rose 17% Y/Y to $4.7 billion ($120 million beat), while non-GAAP EPS surged 25% Y/Y to $4.15 ($0.47 beat). The growth was led by the Global Business Solutions Group, which grew 18% Y/Y to $3.2 billion. The Online Ecosystem was the main driver here, up 21% Y/Y to $2.5 billion.
The mid-market continues to be a massive growth engine. Revenue from QBO Advanced and the Intuit Enterprise Suite (IES) jumped 40%, with new IES contracts growing nearly 50% sequentially as accountants increasingly move their larger clients to Intuit’s AI-native ERP platform.
Despite the strong Q2 performance, shares dipped on a soft Q3 outlook. Intuit projects 10% revenue growth and non-GAAP EPS of $12.45–$12.51 for the peak tax season quarter, trailing the $12.97 consensus due to a shift in marketing spend and continued heavy AI investments.
Management reaffirmed full-year FY26 guidance (12–13% revenue growth), as it typically waits until after the critical third quarter to update the annual forecast. While Mailchimp continues to lag with slightly negative growth, the core QuickBooks and TurboTax engines remain robust.
2026-02-27 21:02:40
Welcome to the Free edition of How They Make Money.
Over 300,000 subscribers turn to us for business and investment insights
In case you missed it:
Headlines are fixated on AI bubble skepticism, while NVIDIA’s numbers tell a story of a new world being built.
CEO Jensen Huang believes we officially moved past the era of experimental training and entered the era of the agentic inflection:
“In this new world of AI, compute equals revenues. Without compute, there’s no way to generate tokens. Without tokens, there’s no way to grow revenues. [...] I am certain at this point that we’ve reached the inflection point.”
Huang is framing NVIDIA’s chips not as a capital expense, but as the direct raw material (tokens) required for customers to make money.
The latest quarter highlights three structural pillars:
Tokenomics over CapEx: Compute is becoming a raw material. Because every AI-generated token (a word, a pixel, a line of code) has an immediate market price, higher performance-per-watt translates directly into higher net margins per token.
Systems over Silicon: The bear case argues that specialized custom chips would steal the inference market. NVIDIA’s response is a shift from selling individual chips to delivering entire AI Factories. By controlling the networking fabric and the software stack, NVIDIA is ensuring that the cost-per-token remains lower on its platform.
Multi-Generational Overlap: For the first time, NVIDIA is ramping two flagship architectures—Blackwell and Rubin—simultaneously. With Rubin samples already shipping to customers this week, the roadmap is designed to capture the bulk of the estimated $4 trillion in infrastructure build-out coming this decade.
Let’s break down the quarter.
Today at a glance:
NVIDIA’s Q4 FY26.
Business highlights.
Key quotes from the call.
What to watch moving forward.
NVIDIA’s fiscal year ends in January, so they just reported Q4 FY26.
Data Center revenue remains off the charts, as illustrated below.
Revenue jumped +20% Q/Q and 73% Y/Y to $68.1 billion ($1.9 billion beat).
⚙️ Data Center +22% Q/Q and +75% Y/Y to $62.3 billion.
🎮 Gaming -13% Q/Q and +47% Y/Y to $3.7 billion.
👁️ Professional Viz +75% Q/Q and +159% Y/Y to $1.3 billion.
🚘 Automotive +2% Q/Q and +6% Y/Y to $0.6 billion.
🏭 OEM & Other -7% Q/Q and +28% Y/Y to $0.2 billion.
Gross margin was 75% (+2pp Y/Y).
Operating margin was 65% (+4pp Y/Y).
Non-GAAP operating margin was 68% (+1pp Y/Y).
Non-GAAP EPS $1.62 ($0.08 beat).
Operating cash flow +118% Y/Y to $36.2 billion.
Free cash flow +58% Y/Y to $34.9 billion.
Cash and cash equivalents: $62.6 billion.
Debt: $8.5 billion.
Revenue +15% Q/Q and +77% Y/Y to $78.0 billion ($6.0 billion beat).
Gross margin 75% (flat Q/Q).
⚙️ Data Center is now 91% of the business: We are witnessing a fundamental shift from AI being a research project to a profit center.
⚡ King of inference: While bears argue that specialized chips (ASICs) might take share as the market moves from training to inference. The Grace Blackwell servers are proving to be the most efficient infrastructure for running live AI tools.
🔌 Networking as a moat: Networking revenue hit $11 billion. This is the glue that prevents customers from easily switching to rival chips. As clusters grow to millions of GPUs, the complexity of the networking fabric becomes a structural barrier to entry for competitors.
🎮 Gaming faces a supply squeeze: Revenue fell 13% Q/Q to $3.7 billion. While some of this is seasonal, the bigger story is the global shortage of memory chips. NVIDIA is currently prioritizing its high-margin Data Center business for these scarce components, leaving the Gaming division supply-gated for the foreseeable future.
👁️ Professional Visualization was the surprise star: It was the fastest-growing segment this quarter, jumping 75% Q/Q to $1.3 billion. This was driven by a massive enterprise refresh cycle as companies upgrade to Blackwell-based workstations to run AI agents and industrial digital twins locally rather than in the cloud.
📈 Margins are the ultimate lie detector: Despite the complexity of ramping liquid-cooled Blackwell racks and the surging cost of memory chips, gross margin improved to 75.2%. If demand were softening or competition were biting, this would be the first place we would see scuff marks. The warning of a "very tight" supply for the next few quarters could shake things up.
🔮 The $78 billion outlook: Q1 FY27 guidance was a massive $6 billion beat over analyst estimates. But the market’s tepid reaction proves that NVIDIA is now held to a very high standard. Some bulls were whispering for $80 billion, and any hint of a supply ceiling (like the memory crunch) is enough to make investors pause.
Big picture: NVIDIA’s engine is now powered by the Blackwell Ultra refresh, the explosive networking growth, and the agentic transition. With $95 billion in supply-related commitments on the books, NVIDIA is already manufacturing the next two years of the AI cycle.
The market is increasingly focused on the cozy relationship between NVIDIA and its largest customers. With nearly $97 billion in annual free cash flow, NVIDIA is becoming the venture capitalist of the AI age.
By participating in OpenAI’s latest $30 billion round and deepening ties with Anthropic and CoreWeave, NVIDIA ensures that the most advanced AI models remain optimized for CUDA. Critics argue that NVIDIA is funding its own customers.
Jensen Huang defended this by highlighting the diversity of the customer base. Hyperscalers now account for only 50% of revenue, and growth is shifting toward sovereign AI and enterprise ISVs. The circular risk is diluted as the ecosystem broadens.
He also doubled down on the idea that customers must keep spending to grow. It captures the tension of this moment. NVIDIA sees a new industrial revolution, while some on Wall Street see a CapEx binge.
A more immediate threat emerged recently, as some of NVIDIA’s largest customers became shareholders in a competitor.
Meta just announced a multi-generation agreement worth more than $100 billion to deploy up to 6 gigawatts (GW) of AMD compute capacity. To secure this capacity, AMD issued Meta performance-based warrants for up to 160 million shares—roughly a 10% equity stake in AMD.
It is a carbon copy of the OpenAI-AMD pact signed in late 2025, which also included a 6 GW commitment and a 10% equity incentive.
By aligning their financial interests with AMD, two of NVIDIA’s most important allies are now directly incentivized to see AMD’s MI450 architecture succeed. For every gigawatt they deploy, they not only solve their supply chain bottleneck, but they also potentially unlock billions in capital appreciation from their AMD holdings. They are ecosystem partners with a vested interest in a multi-polar GPU market.
The market is valuing NVIDIA as if China is permanently zero. That embeds an option into the stock.
The Trump administration’s decision to allow small-scale H200 shipments comes with a US inspection requirement and a 25% tariff. This effectively makes NVIDIA chips the most expensive way to build AI in China.
CFO Colette Kress was clear that they are guiding for $0 revenue from China Data Center compute. This conservative guidance means any surprise approval or easing of these inspections represents an upside. NVIDIA is currently winning without China.
Check out the earnings call transcript on Fiscal.ai here.
“The wave that we’re seeing now is the agentic AI inflection [...] and it literally happened in the last couple of two, three months. [...] The agents are super smart, they’re solving real problems. Coding is obviously supported by agentic systems now.”
The latest catalyst is the shift from chatbots to autonomous agents that “run for minutes to hours” and consume massive amounts of compute.
“Every time you cross a dielet, you have to cross an interface. Every time you cross an interface, you add latency, you add power unnecessarily. [...] The dielet tax shows up in the architecture effectiveness of the competitors.”
Jensen is defending NVIDIA’s monolithic design (single piece) as a physical advantage in power efficiency that competitors using multi-chiplet designs can’t easily match. His bet is that architectural purity beats modular flexibility at hyperscale.
NVDA has been mostly flat in the past 6 months, a period of consolidation. The latest 13F filings for Q4 2025 showed that some funds were still buying, such as Altimeter and Atreides. The stock remains one of the most widely held names, although many funds are still underexposed relative to its nearly 8% weight in the S&P 500.
At ~27x forward earnings, NVIDIA trades mostly in line with the rest of Big Tech. But with EPS surging 67% Y/Y, you could certainly argue it looks cheap. NVIDIA’s growth is supply-constrained. That means quarter-to-quarter noise matters less than understanding how long this cycle can run and what the business looks like when demand normalizes.
If you’re a regular reader, you already know the stakes:
Inference momentum: Will NVIDIA’s full-stack strategy (Networking + Vera CPUs) protect its 75% margins against the rising tide of custom hyperscaler chips?
Memory bottleneck: Watch for any signs that the memory supply chain is loosening. With Micron exiting the consumer chip business and Steam running out of handhelds, NVIDIA’s Gaming rebound depends entirely on the availability of RAM.
Rubin cadence: Jensen confirmed Rubin is already in production. Any delay in the Blackwell-to-Rubin transition could create a demand air pocket that the market isn’t prepared for.
China visibility: NVIDIA is maintaining a zero-China baseline. Any revenue recognized through the new inspection-based licenses would be a pure upside surprise to the current stock price.
Power-to-token ratio: As data centers hit the 1-Gigawatt ceiling, performance-per-watt is the new ROI. NVIDIA’s lead depends on being the most energy-efficient AI factory on the planet.
In a token economy, efficiency is profit.
That’s the battlefield NVIDIA intends to dominate.
That’s it for today!
Happy investing!
Thanks to Fiscal.ai for being our official data partner. Create your own charts and pull key metrics from 50,000+ companies directly on Fiscal.ai. Save 15% with this link.
Disclosure: I own AAPL, AMD, AMZN, GOOG, META, and NVDA in App Economy Portfolio. I share my ratings (BUY, SELL, or HOLD) with App Economy Portfolio members.
Author's Note (Bertrand here 👋🏼): The views and opinions expressed in this newsletter are solely my own and should not be considered financial advice or any other organization's views.
2026-02-25 08:10:17
Welcome to the Premium edition of How They Make Money.
Over 290,000 subscribers turn to us for business and investment insights.
In case you missed it:
We’re tracking the early standouts today.
Coming up later this week: NVIDIA, Salesforce, Snowflake, and more.
Anthropic’s announcement of Claude Code Security on Friday has triggered a sell-off in the last few software stocks that had been holding up. The tool scans codebases and patches vulnerabilities like a human researcher. It wiped billions in value off security leaders like CrowdStrike and Okta. It’s the latest reminder that if you are a software stock in 2026, you are only one Anthropic blog post away from calamity.
While Anthropic is busy terrifying SaaS investors, the company itself relies on Workday to manage its own global operations. It might surprise you since Klarna famously ditched the software in 2024 to build its own alternative internally. It seems even the creators of the world’s most advanced agents still need a reliable place to file their expenses and manage their headcount.
It’s the delicious irony of this moment. The largest AI disruptors are still writing checks to the incumbents for their HR and finance stacks. The AI revolution is still being run on the very software it’s supposed to be replacing. But it probably won’t change the bear case, which ignores the numbers today and focuses on the disruption tomorrow.
Today at a glance:
👔 Workday: Funding the AI Pivot
🤝 MercadoLibre: Playing the Long Game
⚡️ Axon: Surprise 2028 Target
⛷️ Amer Sports: Salomon Expansion
🖨️ HP: PC Strength Overshadowed
🍕 Domino’s: Taking a Bigger Slice
🧬 Tempus AI: Scaling Data Advantage
🌊 DigitalOcean: Rule of 50 by 2027
💊 Hims & Hers: Legal Headwinds
🍿 AMC: Attendance Drops
Workday wrapped up FY26 (ending in January) with a fourth-quarter beat. But a soft outlook and a sudden CEO transition sent shares tumbling roughly 8% in after-hours trading. Q4 revenue rose 15% Y/Y to $2.53 billion ($10 million beat), and non-GAAP EPS reached $2.47 ($0.15 beat). Subscription revenue was the main driver, rising 16% Y/Y to $2.36 billion.
WDAY was already in a tough spot, with shares trading nearly 60% off their peak. The market reacted poorly to the company’s fiscal 2027 guidance. Workday expects full-year subscription revenue growth to slow to 12% to 13% ($9.925 billion to $9.950 billion), missing the $10 billion consensus estimate. This outlook matched the growth in subscription revenue backlog, up 12% Y/Y to $28.1 billion.
Adjusted operating margins are also forecasted to dip to 30% in FY27 (down from 30.6% in Q4 FY26) as the company prioritizes AI investments over near-term margin expansion. Management also noted that large enterprise deals in the federal and healthcare sectors are taking longer to close.
Workday is spending heavily to buy its way into immediate AI capabilities. In quick succession, they integrated Sana (conversational AI and enterprise connectivity) and acquired Pipedream (a startup with tools to connect AI agents to external services), following the recent close of Paradox (an AI recruiting platform).
The ROI on this approach is starting to show. In Q4 alone, Workday generated over $100 million in new Annual Contract Value (ACV) strictly from emerging AI products (over 100% Y/Y growth). Overall Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) from these AI solutions has now crossed $400 million. Internally, the company has completely overhauled its engineering infrastructure. Over 75% of Workday's software engineers now use AI coding assistants, resulting in more than 50% of newly committed code being AI-generated and boosting overall engineering output by 22%.
The quarter featured a major leadership change. Carl Eschenbach stepped down earlier this month, bringing co-founder Aneel Bhusri back to the CEO role. Bhusri used the earnings call to push Workday’s Chapter Four strategy, focusing heavily on integrating agentic AI directly into HR and finance workflows. To monetize this shift, the company is transitioning to a consumption-based Flex Credits pricing model for its AI offerings.
These clear AI tailwinds are not doing much for the stock. For now, the market is keeping WDAY in the penalty box and isn’t giving the new management team the benefit of the doubt. The company is trading at a forward EBITDA multiple below 10x.
2026-02-21 23:02:20
Welcome to the Saturday PRO edition of How They Make Money.
Over 290,000 subscribers turn to us for business and investment insights.
In case you missed it:
📊 Monthly reports: 200+ companies visualized.
📩 Tuesday articles: Exclusive deep dives and insights.
📚 Access to our archive: Hundreds of business breakdowns.
📩 Saturday PRO reports: Timely insights on the latest earnings.
Today at a glance:
🛒 Walmart: E-Commerce Leads the Way
🛩️ Airbus: Engine Dispute Dents Outlook
⚙️ Analog Devices: Industrial Power Ahead
🏝️ Booking: Stacking Savings
💡 Cadence: AI Amplifies the Backlog
💼 Moody’s: AI Resilience
🥡 DoorDash: Local Commerce OS
🎤 Live Nation: A $25 Billion Encore
🌎 Global Payments: Pure-Play Pivot
🛵 Grab: Critical Proof Point
💻 Lenovo: AI Boom Meets Memory Crunch
🎨 Figma: AI Fears Fade For Now
💳 Klarna: Banking Pivot
📦 Etsy: Pure-Play Pivot
🛍️ Global-e: Scaling Through Intelligence
Walmart just reported its January quarter (Q4 FY26), and revenue grew 6% Y/Y to $190.7 billion ($2.4 billion beat). Adjusted EPS narrowly topped expectations, marking a resilient holiday season despite a compressed shopping window.
Walmart US comps rose 4.6%, matching consensus, driven by a 2.6% increase in transactions. International sales were a standout, climbing 11.5% to $35.9 billion, led by strength in China, Mexico (Walmex), and India (Flipkart).
The steady shift toward digital continued:
E-commerce momentum: Global e-commerce sales grew 24%, now representing 23% of total revenue. In the US, online sales jumped 27%, fueled by store-fulfilled delivery and a growing marketplace.
Profit diversification: High-margin streams (advertising and membership) now account for nearly one-third of total operating income. Global advertising grew 37% (bolstered by VIZIO), while membership revenue surged over 15%.
AI integration: The AI shopping assistant, Sparky, is showing early success. Customers using the tool have an average order value 35% higher than those who do not.
The Walmart US boss, John Furner, officially took over as CEO on February 1, 2026. Furner inherits a company with a healthy balance sheet, nearly $15 billion in free cash flow in FY26, and a massive new $30 billion share buyback authorization.
Inventory management remains a major win, with levels growing at just half the rate of sales growth, thanks to automation in 60% of US stores and 50% of fulfillment centers. This efficiency helped adjusted operating income grow 10.5%, significantly outpacing sales growth.
Despite the beat, shares saw some volatility due to a cautious FY27 outlook that missed analyst targets:
Sales growth: 3.5%–4.5% (vs. 5% consensus).
Adjusted EPS: $2.75–$2.85 (vs. $2.97 consensus).
Management cited an unpredictable macro environment, noting a widening spending gap between high-income households (earning over $100k) and stretched low-income consumers. While Walmart continues to gain share across all cohorts, it is bracing for potential headwinds from tariff-related cost pressures and normalized pricing.
Airbus closed FY25 with a mixed quarter, beating on the bottom line but missing on revenue and delivering a disappointing outlook.
Q4 revenue rose 5% Y/Y to €26.0 billion (€0.8 billion miss), while GAAP EPS was €3.27 (€0.50 beat). For the full year, the company saw revenue rise 6% Y/Y to €73.4 billion and posted a record Adjusted EBIT of €7.1 billion. Airbus delivered 793 commercial aircraft in FY25, backed by a backlog of 8,754 jets.
However, shares tumbled following an unusually public and combative rebuke of engine supplier Pratt & Whitney (an RTX subsidiary). CEO Guillaume Faury explicitly accused Pratt of failing to meet its contractual commitments for engine deliveries, prioritizing the maintenance of existing airline fleets over supplying new jets. Airbus announced it has formally triggered a dispute clause in its contract to seek compensation for lost business.
As a direct result of the engine shortage, Airbus significantly slashed its 2026 production guidance. The company now expects to deliver roughly 870 commercial aircraft in 2026 (well below the Wall Street consensus of 900+ jets) and generate an Adjusted EBIT of around €7.5 billion (missing the €8.2 billion expectation). The long-held goal of producing 75 A320s per month has been delayed yet again, now targeted for the end of 2027.
