2026-02-05 18:42:15
Blockchain technology is no longer just the backbone of cryptocurrencies; it has become a powerful tool for real businesses. In a world still reeling from supply-chain disruptions and data breaches, blockchain promises to reinvent trust in multi-party systems. As Deloitte notes, “using blockchain can improve both supply chain transparency and traceability” while cutting costs.
\ Kevin Werbach of Wharton puts it succinctly:
“Blockchain is not the end of trust. Blockchain is a new structure of trust, a ‘new architecture of trust’ that recreates trust differently.”
\ In practice, companies across industries are piloting blockchains wherever they need a shared, tamper-evident record from tracking produce in a grocer’s cold chain to verifying a customer’s ID, so let’s explore some concrete examples.
\
Global supply chains have become astonishingly complex. Recent events showed that a single contaminated batch or a port congestion can cause massive delays. To combat this, retailers and shippers are adopting blockchain to track goods end-to-end. A shared ledger lets every participant, from farmer to retailer, append data that cannot be stealthily altered. Deloitte reports that blockchain “provides a trusted shared and reliable way to record, validate, and view transactions across a complex system with many participants, some of whom may not inherently trust each other.” For example, Walmart’s Food Trust network (built with Hyperledger Fabric) now traces dozens of produce items on a blockchain. Its pilots showed that tracing mangoes went from 7 days down to 2.2 seconds, simply by putting origin data on-chain. Today, Walmart “can now trace the origin of over 25 products from 5 different suppliers” on the blockchain, and it is even requiring all leafy-green growers to log data on the network. As Walmart’s food-safety chief Frank Yiannas observes, people often call it a “food supply chain,” but in reality, “it’s not actually a chain, it’s a complex network”. In such a network, a tamper-proof shared ledger turns out to be exactly what’s needed. Karl Bedwell, Senior Director at Walmart Technology, notes that blockchain was “a good fit for this problem, because of its focus on trust, immutability, and transparency.”
\ The logistics industry is seeing similar gains. Maersk and IBM’s TradeLens platform uses blockchain to digitize shipping documents. Instead of faxing cargo manifests and certificates, ports, carriers, customs, and shippers all publish events (loading, arrival, clearance) onto the chain. Lars Kastrup of Maersk explains: “With TradeLens, we want to create an unprecedented level of transparency that enables supply chain players to respond almost instantly to unpredictable changes”. Because most of the world’s largest carriers have joined, TradeLens now covers roughly two-thirds of global container volume. The platform records over 10 million shipping events per week, all visible to permissioned users. As Maersk notes, blockchain produces “a digitized, shared, immutable record of all the transactions that take place within a network”. In practice, this means customs and cargo owners share one source of truth: any party can audit a shipment’s history and trust that everyone else sees the same data. Early results have been promising. TradeLens customers report far fewer delays from missing documents and faster customs clearance, thanks to this single transparent ledger.
\ Blockchain’s supply-chain impact isn’t limited to food and containers. In healthcare and pharmaceuticals, it’s being tested for vaccine and drug tracking. The World Economic Forum highlights that “blockchain offers an immutable, decentralized database that can help all parties be sure that vaccine supplies are being stored and handled properly.” For example, temperature data and shipment logs for COVID-19 vaccines can be recorded on-chain, so no one can deny whether cold-chain requirements were met. Similarly, networks like MediLedger (backed by large drug companies) use blockchain to trace drug provenance and fight counterfeits. In each case, the goal is the same: when multiple organizations don’t fully trust each other, a permissioned blockchain provides a tamper-proof way to share critical data and dramatically accelerate any recall or verification process.
\
Blockchain isn’t just for tracking products; it’s also reshaping digital identity. Every year, businesses grapple with identity fraud and KYC (Know Your Customer) compliance. If identity attributes (passports, licenses, certificates) are issued and verified on a blockchain, then anyone in the network can instantly check their authenticity. For example, Estonia’s government has effectively built a blockchain-like system to secure all citizen records: health data, land titles, e-residency credentials, you name it. As the e-Estonia site proudly notes, with their Keyless Signature Infrastructure, “the authenticity of electronic data can be mathematically proven” and “nobody… can manipulate the data”. This means if a doctor or bank queries an Estonian citizen’s digital ID, they know it hasn’t been forged or altered, without having to query a central database.
\ Big tech and financial firms are exploring similar ideas. IBM, for instance, promotes blockchain-based identity networks that let individuals carry cryptographically-secured credentials. In IBM’s words, with blockchain, “information about identity is auditable, traceable, and verifiable in just seconds.” Imagine a customer opening a bank account: instead of submitting paper documents or relying on an external agency, the bank simply requests a proof-of-identity credential on the chain. The network instantly confirms whether the customer’s driver’s license or passport is genuine, without exposing the full document. Likewise, a university diploma or professional license could be issued as a blockchain-verified claim that any employer can check. In all these cases, businesses gain efficiency, and consumers get privacy: each party sees only what they need, yet everyone shares a single ledger of truth. In short, blockchain-based identity lets organizations improve security and user control in online authentication and KYC processes.
\
Marketing and advertising have also found practical blockchain use-cases. Digital ad networks today struggle with fraud (fake clicks and bots) and opaque middlemen. A blockchain can enforce transparency: every ad impression, bid, and click can be written to a shared ledger so that no party can later alter or double-count it. This “cost-saving transparency” is exactly what marketers need: a decentralized log that any advertiser, agency, or publisher can audit. For example, IBM teamed with ad-platform Mediaocean to build an end-to-end blockchain ledger of ad campaigns. In that system, when an advertiser’s budget buys an ad, the event is recorded on-chain. Later, when a website reports a click or impression, that too is logged. Because everyone’s looking at the same history, it’s virtually impossible to surreptitiously inflate numbers or siphon off funds. Early pilots of blockchain ad ledgers show significant reductions in “ghost ads” and billing disputes, and they promise to shift more of the spend directly to publishers and content creators.
\ Blockchain is a perfect fit for loyalty and rewards programmes. Rather than the usual opaque point accounts, companies can create tokens on a blockchain. For example, a specialty in Blockchain for loyalty programmes, like Loyyal, lets airlines, hotels & banks issue points as digital tokens & consumers can stockpile or exchange them across partner businesses. Every token's life cycle, issued, transferred, and redeemed, is recorded in a permanent digital record (the blockchain), so both customers and marketers can clearly see where the points came from & how they were used. This openness makes programmes more interesting, maybe users can swap unused airline miles for hotel credits and wipes out fraud points that can't be just faked or endlessly used again. Industry experts agree that with blockchain, marketing teams can "get a hold on data better, get a more in-depth understanding of customer interactions and build real relationships with customers". In reality, this means you get reliable & trustworthy reports of campaign results & loyalty balances, turning marketing from guesswork into a real process with a record of what happened.
\ Blockchain is a natural fit for loyalty and rewards programs as well. Instead of opaque point accounts, companies can mint tokens on a blockchain. For instance, Loyyal offers a blockchain platform for loyalty points: airlines, hotels, and banks can issue points as tokens, and consumers can accumulate or exchange them across partners. Every token’s lifecycle issuance, transfer, and redemption is immutably recorded on-chain, so both customers and marketers see exactly where the points came from and how they were spent. This transparency makes programs more engaging (users might trade unused airline miles for hotel credits) and eliminates fraud (points cannot be faked or endlessly recycled). More broadly, industry analysts note that blockchain lets marketing teams “better manage data, gain deeper insights into audience interactions and cultivate meaningful customer relationships.” In practice, this means faster, trustworthy reporting of campaign results and loyalty balances, turning marketing from guesswork into a verifiable ledger-driven process.
\
While supply chain, identity, and advertising are headline use-cases, blockchain is making inroads in many other business domains. Banks and trade finance networks are utilizing blockchains to automate complex transactions. For example, several large banks jointly use blockchain-based trade platforms (such as Marco Polo and Contour) to issue digital letters of credit and settle transactions, drastically reducing paperwork and payment delays. In the energy sector, startups and utilities are piloting blockchain-powered grids that enable households to buy and sell solar power peer-to-peer, and where emissions credits are transparently tracked. Even public services are exploring blockchains: land registries (to prevent deed fraud) and voting pilots (to audit tallies) have been tried in places like Sweden and India. The common theme in each case is multi-party coordination: whenever several organizations must agree on shared data, a permissioned blockchain can reduce reconciliation headaches and errors. While not every industry needs a blockchain, the above examples show that well-designed DLT systems can eliminate intermediaries, cut fraud, and enhance transparency across many sectors.
\
In short, blockchain’s impact today comes from embedding trust and traceability into real-world workflows, not from speculative crypto markets. Whether tracking romaine lettuce back to the farm, verifying a digital ID in seconds, or logging every advertising dollar, businesses are finding concrete value. These systems may not be flashy cryptocurrency token projects, but they solve real pain points. If a company’s challenge involves many distrustful parties sharing data, “a new architecture of trust” can be built with blockchain. As blockchain networks mature and integrate with IoT and AI, we can expect even more such enterprise use-cases. The key lesson: smart business leaders focus on what problem they’re solving, and use blockchain as the tool to lock in transparency, not as an end in itself. In that sense, the blockchain renaissance beyond crypto is just getting started.
2026-02-05 18:08:43
You've probably been there: you want to trade some crypto, so you log into your go-to exchange, check the rate, and hit go. Simple enough, right?
Here's the catch – that rate you just accepted might not be the best one available. In fact, it almost certainly isn't. Different exchanges price the same crypto pairs differently, sometimes by a fraction of a percent, sometimes by a lot more. And unless you're manually checking five different platforms before every trade, you're leaving real money on the table.
That's the core problem a crypto exchange aggregator solves. Instead of showing you one rate from one exchange, an aggregator pulls rates and liquidity from multiple exchange partners at the same time, then lets you pick the best option. No extra tabs, no separate accounts, no guesswork.
Swapzone is a crypto exchange aggregator that works with 18+ partner exchanges and covers over 1,600 cryptocurrencies. It's non-custodial – your funds never pass through Swapzone – and requires no KYC for swap transactions. The platform has earned a 4.7/5 rating on Trustpilot, built on one clear idea: show you the best available rate across multiple exchanges, every time.
Below, we break down six real-world use cases where an aggregator gives you a clear edge over sticking with a single exchange – from getting the best deal on a quick crypto trade to building apps that need exchange functionality. These are the scenarios where an aggregator wins.
\
The most direct win – and also the most common reason people start using an exchange aggregator. 
\ On a single crypto exchange, you get one rate for any given pair. That's the only option on the table. You might assume it's competitive, but without checking other platforms, you'd never actually know. And manually comparing five exchanges every time you want to trade? Nobody does that.
Swapzone does the checking for you. It pulls live exchange rates from 18+ partner exchanges at once. When you enter a swap – say BTC to ETH – you see multiple offers ranked by price. You pick the best one.
Here's why this matters more than people realize: rates aren't static, and they don't move in lockstep across exchanges. At any given moment, one exchange might have the edge on a BTC/ETH pair, while another wins on a different crypto pair entirely. On larger trades, even a 0.5% rate difference adds up fast. Across dozens of transactions over weeks and months, that gap compounds into real, measurable savings. You're not blindly trusting one exchange's pricing anymore – you're picking the best deal across the market.
The real win: A single exchange can only show you one rate. An aggregator shows you the whole market – and you pick the best one.
\
\ The crypto ecosystem now runs across dozens of blockchains. Tokens live on Ethereum, Solana, Avalanche, and many other networks. Moving digital assets between these chains used to be a painful multi-step process – find the right bridge, confirm it supports your specific tokens, pay fees at every hop, and hope nothing stalls.
This is one of the areas where an aggregator earns its place. Swapzone's DEX aggregator handles cross-chain routing behind the scenes. You enter your starting crypto, pick your target crypto, and the platform works out the best path. It could be a direct swap, a bridge, or a combination of both – the routing logic is handled for you.
What used to require juggling multiple platforms and crypto wallets now happens in a single interface. You don't need to research which bridge works best for which chain. That's the aggregator's job, not yours.
The real win: Cross-chain crypto swaps shouldn't require technical expertise. An aggregator turns a multi-step process into one clean transaction.
\
\ This is the one most users don't think about – but it costs them the most.
A lot of instant exchange services quietly mark up the rate itself, rather than charging an explicit fee. They might advertise "zero commission," but the rate they offer is worse than the mid-market price. You're paying more on every trade – you just don't see it as a line item. The only way to catch this is to compare rates from a different source.
This is where aggregators have a structural edge. When Swapzone shows you offers from multiple partner services side by side, you can actually see the differences. One service might show slightly better pricing but charge a visible fee. Another might do the opposite. You choose based on real data, not just whatever default rate happened to be in front of you.
Real users have noticed this. One Swapzone user pointed out that the platform let them see "familiar names and compare prices between them" – something that's simply not possible when you're stuck with a single swap service. That kind of transparent rate comparison is the baseline on an aggregator, not a bonus.
The real win: Hidden fees survive because there's nothing to compare them against. An aggregator makes the comparison automatic.
\
Speed matters in crypto markets. Rates shift constantly, and if your exchange is slow to process or has a confusing interface, you might end up with a worse rate by the time you actually complete the transaction.
Instant crypto exchange services – platforms that process transactions in minutes rather than hours – have become the standard. But they're not all built the same way. Some are faster for specific pairs, some carry better liquidity on certain tokens, and some perform better on specific blockchains. Picking the right one for a given trade used to mean signing up for multiple services and testing them one by one.
Swapzone brings all of these instant exchange options into one dashboard. You see processing times, rates, and available offers at a glance – no need to create accounts on five different services just to compare. And because Swapzone is non-custodial, your digital assets stay under your control the whole time. You're simply using the platform to find and execute the best deal.
The real win: Comparing instant exchanges one by one wastes time. An aggregator does the comparison work for you.
\
\ If you're building a dapp, a crypto wallet, or any application that needs to offer exchange functionality, connecting directly to multiple exchanges is a serious engineering challenge. Every partner runs its own interface, its own authentication flow, and its own rate limits. Scale that across 10+ exchanges and you've got a project that's slow to build and even slower to maintain.
A crypto exchange aggregator API turns that into a single integration. Developers get one endpoint that already pulls live market data and rates from multiple exchange sources. Swapzone's API gives access to rates, liquidity, and trade execution across its network of 18+ partner exchanges – without building individual connections to each one.
This is useful for DeFi projects and wallet teams that want to give their users the best available rates without becoming exchange infrastructure experts. Wire up one connection, and your app has access to the same multi-exchange rate comparison that Swapzone users see on the main platform.
The real win: Building exchange integrations from scratch is slow and expensive. An aggregator API cuts it down to one clean connection.
\
\ Getting into crypto for the first time usually involves a frustrating chain of steps: find an exchange that accepts your payment method, create an account, go through KYC verification, fund your wallet – and only then can you actually buy something. That's a lot of friction before you own a single coin.
Swapzone brings buy crypto options into the same interface where trades happen. You can buy bitcoin with fiat or trade one cryptocurrency for another without hopping between platforms. For transactions done via swap, there's no KYC required – a big advantage for users who value speed and privacy.
This means you don't need accounts scattered across multiple platforms just to stay active in the market. One place to compare rates, one place to buy, one place to swap. For anyone building or growing a crypto wallet, that simplicity saves a lot of unnecessary back-and-forth.
The real win: Buying crypto should be a one-stop process, not a multi-platform tour. An aggregator keeps it that way.
\
Six use cases, one clear pattern: a single crypto exchange gives you limited information and limited options. A crypto exchange aggregator gives you both.
Swapzone pulls rates from 18+ partner exchanges, supports over 1,600 digital assets, and runs on a non-custodial, no-KYC basis for swaps. You see what you're paying. You pick the best deal. And you're not wasting time comparing platforms manually – the aggregator handles that for you.
From getting the best rate on a Bitcoin swap to building apps with an aggregator API, the advantage is the same across the board: more options, better visibility into pricing, and more control than any single exchange can deliver.
If you want to compare the best rates and swap options in one place, try Swapzone.
2026-02-05 17:48:19
\ Every time a new wave of automation appears, the same fear resurfaces: “This time is different. This time, jobs are really gone.”
AI feels like that moment for software development.
But what’s actually happening is far less dramatic — and far more interesting.
==Programming is not disappearing. Its economic role is changing.==
\
\ For a long time, software teams scaled linearly. More features meant more people, more ideas meant more engineers.
That made sense when writing code was the bottleneck.
Today, it isn’t.
With modern AI tools, a single experienced developer can prototype in days what used to take weeks, implement full features without hand-holding, generate, test, refactor, and iterate rapidly, cover frontend, backend, and infrastructure at once.
Not because they became superhuman — but because leverage increased.
And when leverage increases, hiring logic changes.
\
\ In the current reality, hiring “extra hands” often creates more friction than progress.
Every new developer adds onboarding cost, communication overhead, coordination tax, architectural compromises.
Meanwhile, ==one strong engineer with clear ownership and AI assistance can move faster than a small team bogged down by process.==
This is why many founders quietly prefer one high-impact engineer over three average ones.
Not out of greed — but out of efficiency.
\
\ Small teams were able to build and ship entire products with a level of speed that would have required multiple specialized roles just a few years ago. Features that once demanded coordination between frontend, backend, and infrastructure were often owned end-to-end by a single engineer. AI didn’t remove complexity — it removed delays. The biggest gains didn’t come from generating more code, but from reducing handoffs, meetings, and decision latency. In practice, the fastest teams weren’t the largest ones, but the ones with the fewest dependencies and the clearest ownership.
\
\ This is also why ==AI doesn’t eliminate programmers. It eliminates the need for scale by headcount.==
The market no longer rewards “I can implement tasks I’m given.”
It rewards “I can take a problem and make it disappear.”
That’s a fundamentally different value proposition.
\
\ What AI truly replaces is not engineers — it’s execution without understanding.
\n ==Code generation is cheap now. Judgment is not.==
Understanding trade-offs, defining scope, choosing what not to build, knowing when something is “good enough” — these are the new bottlenecks.
And AI, for all its power, still doesn’t own responsibility.
Humans do.
\
\ This shift also explains why entry-level roles feel scarcer and senior roles feel heavier.
The bar didn’t move up arbitrarily. The surface area of responsibility expanded.
One engineer is now expected to think like a product manager, a system architect, a UX critic, a business partner — not perfectly, but sufficiently.
That’s uncomfortable.
But it’s also empowering.
\
\ The industry is drifting toward a model where teams are smaller, ownership is clearer, iteration is faster, impact per engineer is higher.
The title matters less. The outcome matters more.
==You’re not hired to write code. You’re hired to move a metric.==
\
\ If AI has a bias, it’s this: it amplifies people who already know what they’re doing.
A weak engineer with AI produces more noise. A strong engineer with AI produces disproportionate value.
That gap will only grow.
\
\ So no — AI won’t replace programmers.
But it will continue to replace unnecessary process, bloated teams, low-context execution, and the idea that more people automatically means more progress.
The future belongs to engineers who can think clearly, act independently, and use AI not as a crutch, but as leverage.
==Programming isn’t dying. It’s finally being priced correctly.==
\
2026-02-05 15:11:00
How are you, hacker?
🪐Want to know what's trending right now?:
The Techbeat by HackerNoon has got you covered with fresh content from our trending stories of the day! Set email preference here.
## The SEPA Instant Deadlines Have Passed. But Did Europe Really Go Instant? 
By @noda [ 4 Min read ]
The major SEPA instant payments deadlines have passed, but adoption varies by country. Noda analysis reviews whether Europe has really gone instant. Read More.
By @zbruceli [ 18 Min read ] A deep dive into the Internet Archive's custom tech stack. Read More.
By @dataops [ 3 Min read ] AI exposes fragile data operations. Why “good enough” pipelines fail at machine speed—and how DataOps enables AI-ready data trust. Read More.
By @newsbyte [ 7 Min read ] Meet Yuri Misnik, Chief Technology Officer at inDrive. Read More.
By @nikhiladithyan [ 15 Min read ] Do valuations cause crashes? Use Causal AI & EODHD data to prove how profitability and beta drive downside risk during market shocks. Move beyond correlation. Read More.
By @vgudur [ 9 Min read ] LLMjacking is the hijacking of self-hosted AI models for profit. Learn how attackers exploit LLMs—and how to secure your infrastructure today. Read More.
By @hacker68060072 [ 6 Min read ] From scattered AI pilots to strategic systems: why orchestration, observability, and auditability are the new competitive edge for enterprise AI adoption. Read More.
By @ishanpandey [ 3 Min read ] Flare's $2B FlareDrop program concludes after 36 months of free token distributions. Can the blockchain survive without monthly airdrops? What happens next. Read More.
By @niteshpadghan [ 10 Min read ] The religion was called Crustafarianism. Read More.
By @jonstojanjournalist [ 2 Min read ] Roblox is reshaping education by turning play into experiential learning through immersive, creator-driven digital worlds. Read More.
By @rhortx [ 7 Min read ] Even if AGI isn't feasible, the gains being made right now will drastically disorient the workforce. Read More.
By @zbruceli [ 16 Min read ] Direct-to-device satellite connectivity is turning LEO spacecraft into cell towers. Read More.
By @scylladb [ 7 Min read ] How ShareChat scaled its ML feature store 1000× using ScyllaDB, smarter data modeling, and caching—without scaling the database. Read More.
By @linked_do [ 8 Min read ] Graphite CTO Greg Foster on AI’s dev tools upheaval, why code review matters more now, and the hard line between vibe coding and enterprise software. Read More.
By @proflead [ 2 Min read ] Learn how to run Claude Code with local models using Ollama, enabling offline, privacy-first agentic coding on your own machine. Read More.
By @nsvasilev [ 9 Min read ] Learn how Swift continuations bridge legacy callbacks and delegates with async/await, enabling clean, safe concurrency without rewriting old APIs. Read More.
By @paoloap [ 6 Min read ] LangGraph, CrewAI, AutoGen, Pydantic AI, and 8 more. What works, what doesn't, and when to use each. Read More.
By @vigneshjd [ 25 Min read ] A practical Java tutorial on using Apache Camel and LangChain4j to build scalable LLM chat and RAG pipelines for real-world systems. Read More.
By @dataops [ 3 Min read ] AI shouldn’t sit at the end of the data pipeline. Learn why AI-augmented DataOps is essential for reliability, governance, and scale. Read More.
By @linh [ 5 Min read ]
Got a call from 888-373-1969 claiming to be the Chase fraud department? Trust but verify should be your principle to avoid phishing scam! Read More.
🧑💻 What happened in your world this week? It's been said that writing can help consolidate technical knowledge, establish credibility, and contribute to emerging community standards. Feeling stuck? We got you covered ⬇️⬇️⬇️
ANSWER THESE GREATEST INTERVIEW QUESTIONS OF ALL TIME
We hope you enjoy this worth of free reading material. Feel free to forward this email to a nerdy friend who'll love you for it.
See you on Planet Internet! With love,
The HackerNoon Team ✌️
.gif)
2026-02-05 14:06:59
The app sec community was happy to see that OWASP is considering making a move in their Top 10 update: “Security Logging and Alerting Failures” from position #10 to position #9, and highlighted in the 2025 release with a new name emphasizing a critical component that was often overlooked—alerting.
"Security Logging & Alerting Failures" represents more than a simple reordering of priorities. It signals a shift in how organizations will approach application security in an era of increasingly sophisticated threats and compliance requirements.
The journey from "Insufficient Logging & Monitoring" in 2017 to "Security Logging and Monitoring Failures" in 2021, and finally to "Security Logging & Alerting Failures" in 2025 tells a story of growing recognition. While this category continues to be underrepresented in CVE/CVSS data and remains challenging to test, the security community voted it into this position for good reason.
As OWASP explicitly states in their 2025 documentation: "Great logging with no alerting is of minimal value in identifying security incidents." This simple statement captures why the category earned its promotion. Although it’s important to note that while logging and alerting failures are not typically exploited directly, they materially increase the impact and dwell time of other vulnerabilities. OWASP accounts for this through its risk methodology, combining data with expert and community input.
Organizations can generate mountains of log data, but without effective alerting mechanisms that trigger appropriate action, they're essentially flying blind.
Failures in logging and alerting directly impact three critical security capabilities:
Without robust logging and alerting, security teams cannot detect breaches in progress, respond to active threats, or conduct post-incident analysis to strengthen defenses.
For application security teams, this promotion validates what many have known intuitively but struggled to prioritize: you cannot secure what you cannot see.
Consider the real-world scenarios OWASP highlights. An attacker scans for users with common passwords, taking over accounts systematically. For most users, this leaves only a single failed login attempt. Without comprehensive logging and alerting configured to detect patterns across multiple accounts, this attack flies under the radar until significant damage is done.
Application security teams face several specific challenges that make this category critical:
1. Detection of Complex Attack Patterns: Modern attacks rarely announce themselves with a single obvious indicator. They unfold across multiple sessions, IP addresses, and timeframes. Only comprehensive logging with intelligent alerting can connect these dots.
2. Compliance Requirements: Regulations like PCI-DSS, GDPR, and HIPAA mandate specific logging capabilities. The OWASP promotion underscores that these aren't just checkbox requirements—they're essential security controls.
3. Incident Response Speed: When a security incident occurs, every minute counts. Effective logging and alerting compress the time between detection and response, potentially preventing a minor breach from becoming a catastrophic data loss.
For application security vendors, the OWASP promotion presents both an opportunity and a challenge. Organizations are now prioritizing logging and monitoring capabilities in their security tool selection, creating market demand for solutions that address this category effectively.
However, vendors face significant technical hurdles:
The Volume Problem: Modern web applications generate enormous quantities of log data. A single high-traffic application can produce terabytes of logs daily. Web Application Firewalls generate particularly high volumes due to the nature of edge security—every HTTP request potentially generates multiple log entries as it's evaluated against various security rules.
The Storage Economics Problem: Many first-generation observability and security platforms were built before the era of cloud-scale architectures. They often rely on expensive, tightly coupled storage architectures that make long-term retention of high-volume logs economically prohibitive.
The Access Speed Problem: Logs are only valuable if they can be queried quickly when needed. But many vendors force customers to choose between hot storage (expensive but fast) and cold storage (cheap but slow), creating operational friction that defeats the purpose of comprehensive logging.
Many first-generation observability solutions don't scale well when confronted with application security log volumes, especially from enterprise-grade WAFs.
Consider WAF deployments. Organizations using a WAF can generate hundreds of gigabytes to multiple terabytes of security logs per day. Each HTTP request evaluated by the WAF creates log entries containing information about the request, the rules triggered, actions taken, and contextual metadata.
First-generation, tightly coupled observability platforms face impossible economics at this scale:
Cost Explosion: Platforms charging per-GB ingestion or per-GB storage see costs spiral out of control. Organizations face bills that can easily consume 30% of their total cloud infrastructure budget just for observability.
Forced Data Sacrifice: To manage costs, teams resort to sampling, aggregation, or simply discarding data after short retention periods. This directly undermines the security visibility that OWASP's category emphasizes.
Query Performance Degradation: As data volumes grow, query performance suffers on platforms not architecturally designed for log-scale workloads. What should be a five-second investigation turns into a five-minute wait, or simply times out.
The storage costs alone can break the bank for most organizations. When you're ingesting terabytes daily and industry compliance or security best practices demand retention periods of months or years, traditional per-GB pricing models become untenable.
To solve the problem that the OWASP promotion highlights - providing comprehensive, actionable visibility into high-volume security and application logs at economically sustainable cost - companies need a real-time data platform that alerts second after ingest, doesn’t cost a fortune no matter the amount of data and keeps all data hot for rapid querying.
They need:
Real-Time Alerting at Scale: Real-time data platforms, like Hydrolix, that ingest and make data available for alerting within seconds, even at massive scale, can ingest over 10 million rows per second while maintaining single-digit second latency.
15+ Months of Hot Data Retention: Many data analytics and observability providers force data into cold storage after 7-30 days. That’s exactly what creates the conundrum of discarding or sampling data vs. keeping it all. Companies should look for platforms that maintain all data in "hot" queryable storage for 15 months or more as standard, and with high compression volumes. This means security teams can hunt threats across historical data without the delays and friction of data rehydration.
Sub-Second Query Performance: Sub-second query response times even on datasets containing billions of rows, enable the kind of rapid investigation and analysis that effective incident response demands.
Economic Sustainability: Platforms like Hydrolix come with a 75% cost reduction compared to traditional observability platforms for equivalent workloads. This isn't through data sampling or shortcuts—it's through fundamental architectural advantages, such as decoupling storage from compute, and 25-50x compression.
When running multiple security solutions, companies need seamless integration with all data sources, offering consolidated visibility into security events and delivery traffic in a single platform. With insights in one place, it’s easier to spot issues quickly, and significantly reduce the MTTR.
Achieving those goals requires fundamental architectural choices:
Decoupled Storage and Compute: Many traditional data platforms come with tightly coupled compute and storage architectures. Decoupled, however, is critical because it allows independent scaling of each component based on actual workload requirements. Not only does that increase the speed to insights, but also reduces costs.
Stateless Kubernetes Infrastructure: Platforms should run on stateless Kubernetes architecture, enabling dynamic scaling up during peak events and down during quiet periods, directly controlling costs.
Advanced Compression Technology: High-density compression can significantly reduce costs without sacrificing query performance, fundamentally changing the economics of long-term retention.
Streaming ETL on Ingest: When data transformation and enrichment happen during ingestion, it allows multiple log sources to be combined into unified tables while reducing downstream processing costs.
Optimized for Cloud Object Storage: By maximizing the performance of commodity object storage rather than requiring expensive specialized storage, companies can get enterprise-grade performance at dramatically lower infrastructure costs.
The promotion of “Security Logging & Alerting Failures” in the OWASP Top 10 represents more than a tactical shift in security priorities. It signals a broader recognition that in the modern threat landscape, comprehensive visibility is not optional.
As applications move to cloud-native architectures, adopt microservices patterns, and scale to serve global user bases, the volume and complexity of log data will only increase. The traditional approach of treating logs as a cost center to be minimized must give way to recognizing them as a critical security asset.
Organizations that embrace comprehensive logging and alerting will gain significant security advantages:
The OWASP Top 10 promotion of “Security Logging & Alerting Failures” isn't a reshuffling of priorities—it's a call to action: organizations must prioritize visibility, detection, and response capabilities.
For application security teams, this means making logging and alerting a core part of the overall security stack.
For security vendors, it means building or adopting platforms that can handle log-scale data without forcing impossible tradeoffs.
For data analytics platforms, it's a moment of reckoning. Solutions that cannot economically handle the log volumes generated by modern applications and security tools like enterprise WAFs will increasingly find themselves sidelined.
Hydrolix delivers a new approach that aligns with OWASP's recommendations and without breaking the bank.
If you are interested in learning more, visit hydrolix.io
:::info This story was published under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program.
:::
\
2026-02-05 13:48:21
In my previous analysis of Power Stranding, I explored the multi-billion-dollar art of ensuring that massive power infrastructure doesn't sit idle. But for a data center financial analyst, solving the power equation isn't just about building better substations. It’s about what sits inside the racks.
Looking at a modern data center’s balance sheet in early 2026, the "Hardware" line item is undergoing a silent coup. For decades, the industry operated as a one-stop shop: cloud providers bought their GPUs from Nvidia and their CPUs from Intel or AMD, focusing their engineering on the building around them.
That era is over. We have entered the age of the Vertical Data Center. Hyperscalers - AWS with Trainium 3, Google with TPU v7 (Ironwood), and Microsoft with Maia - are essentially becoming semiconductor houses that happen to own their own real estate.
When I model a new data center build-out, I consider CAPEX, OPEX, and TCO. In-house chips are a "cheat code" for all three:
There is a fascinating divergence in how these programs are being pitched to the Street, and the market’s report card is in.
Google has mastered "The Big Reveal." They have branded the TPU as the secret sauce behind Gemini. When Google speaks to investors, the TPU isn’t just a component; it’s a proprietary moat. They have successfully framed it as an Integrated Stack - where the silicon, the software, and the models are one single machine.
This narrative is working. Over the trailing twelve months, Alphabet (Google) has seen its stock skyrocket roughly 60%, which many investors have interpreted as evidence of successful vertical integration. Google recently confirmed that over 75% of Gemini computations are now handled by its internal TPU fleet.
AWS, by contrast, has traditionally operated as "The Infrastructure Utility." They have treated Trainium as an option for customers - one more tool in a toolbox alongside Nvidia. While this strategy is customer-centric, it lacks the "hero" narrative. Over the same period, Amazon’s stock gains have been more modest (around 5-10%) as the market waits for AWS to prove it can maintain its lead without being taxed by the high cost of third-party silicon. \n
Don’t let the storytelling gap fool you. While Google is more vertically integrated today, Amazon is scaling at a pace that is hard to wrap a spreadsheet around. Project Rainier, Amazon’s internally referenced effort to deploy Trainium at hyperscale, 1 million plus chips by the end of 2026, represents a transition from strategic planning to massive capacity realization.
Amazon isn't trying to build a "walled garden." They are building a dual-highway: one lane for the industry-standard Nvidia stacks, and a second, high-efficiency lane for their own silicon.
In the world of data center finance, the most beautiful spreadsheet is the one where the lines don't just meet - they reinforce each other. Custom silicon is the ultimate reinforcement. It turns the data center from a passive shell into an active participant in the compute cycle.
The race isn't just about who can build the biggest data center anymore. It’s about who can extract the most value out of every single electron. Google is currently winning the PR battle for that electron, but AWS has the scale to win the war - if it starts talking about its chips as the brain of the data center, not just another component in the rack.
For developers and startups, this shift matters because the economics of compute are diverging. The same workload may soon have radically different cost and performance profiles depending on whether it runs on vertically integrated infrastructure or commodity accelerators.
In my previous analysis of Power Stranding, I explored the multi-billion-dollar art of ensuring that massive power infrastructure doesn't sit idle. But for a data center financial analyst, solving the power equation isn't just about building better substations. It’s about what sits inside the racks.
Looking at a modern data center’s balance sheet in early 2026, the "Hardware" line item is undergoing a silent coup. For decades, the industry operated as a one-stop shop: cloud providers bought their GPUs from Nvidia and their CPUs from Intel or AMD, focusing their engineering on the building around them.
That era is over. We have entered the age of the Vertical Data Center. Hyperscalers - AWS with Trainium 3, Google with TPU v7 (Ironwood), and Microsoft with Maia - are essentially becoming semiconductor houses that happen to own their own real estate.
When I model a new data center build-out, I’m looking at CAPEX, OPEX, and TCO. In-house chips are a "cheat code" for all three:
There is a fascinating divergence in how these programs are being pitched to the Street, and the market’s report card is in.
Google has mastered "The Big Reveal." They have branded the TPU as the secret sauce behind Gemini. When Google speaks to investors, the TPU isn’t just a component; it’s a proprietary moat. They have successfully framed it as an Integrated Stack - where the silicon, the software, and the models are one single machine.
This narrative is working. Over the trailing twelve months, Alphabet (Google) has seen its stock skyrocket roughly 60%, which many investors have interpreted as evidence of successful vertical integration. Google recently confirmed that over 75% of Gemini computations are now handled by its internal TPU fleet.
AWS, by contrast, has traditionally operated as "The Infrastructure Utility." They have treated Trainium as an option for customers - one more tool in a toolbox alongside Nvidia. While this strategy is customer-centric, it lacks the "hero" narrative. Over the same period, Amazon’s stock gains have been more modest (around 5-10%) as the market waits for AWS to prove it can maintain its lead without being taxed by the high cost of third-party silicon. \n
Don’t let the storytelling gap fool you. While Google is more vertically integrated today, Amazon is scaling at a pace that is hard to wrap a spreadsheet around. Project Rainier, Amazon’s internally referenced effort to deploy Trainium at hyperscale, 1 million plus chips by the end of 2026, represents a transition from strategic planning to massive capacity realization.
Amazon isn't trying to build a "walled garden." They are building a dual-highway: one lane for the industry-standard Nvidia stacks, and a second, high-efficiency lane for their own silicon.
In the world of data center finance, the most beautiful spreadsheet is the one where the lines don't just meet - they reinforce each other. Custom silicon is the ultimate reinforcement. It turns the data center from a passive shell into an active participant in the compute cycle.
The race isn't just about who can build the biggest data center anymore. It’s about who can extract the most value out of every single electron. Google is currently winning the PR battle for that electron, but AWS has the scale to win the war - if it starts talking about its chips as the brain of the data center, not just another component in the rack.
For developers and startups, this shift matters because the economics of compute are diverging. The same workload may soon have radically different cost and performance profiles depending on whether it runs on vertically integrated infrastructure or commodity accelerators.
