MoreRSS

site iconBear Blog Trending PostsModify

Ranked according to the following algorithm:Score = log10(U) + (S / D * 8600), U is Upvotes , S/D is time.
Please copy the RSS to your reader, or quickly subscribe to:

Inoreader Feedly Follow Feedbin Local Reader

Rss preview of Blog of Bear Blog Trending Posts

Pay less taxes using web agents, a directed graph, and Dijkstra's algorithm

2025-12-11 03:00:00

I engineered a first-of-its-kind tool that automates the process of optimizing profit repatriation from international subsidiaries back to corporate headquarters (HQs). This solution is relevant for multinational corporations, startups, high-net-worth individuals, and the tax advisors/accountants who serve them, offering the potential to legally save billions in taxes, and really anyone else who is interested in uncovering the secrets of how some people and companies pay $0%$ tax on the profits they make globally.

My primary goals were to:

  • Address a market gap: eliminate the costly, time-consuming manual research traditionally required to identify the initial steps for establishing complex tax structures.
  • Increase transparency: demystify the mechanics of profit-repatriation strategies for a broader audience.
  • Advance tax-planning technology: solve the technical challenge of cross-border tax-planning.

Disclaimer: this post is a technical exploration. It does not reflect or express my personal opinions or views regarding the morality, fairness, or policy of taxation, tax law, or tax avoidance strategies.

Introduction

In this blog post, I will explain step-by-step how I built TreatyHopper: a tool that aims to optimize the process of global tax routing. Typically, when repatriating profits from subsidiaries in foreign countries to the US, a tax has to be paid on the dividends (profits) that are sent by the subsidiary to the US. This tax is called a withholding tax on dividends. In order to avoid paying taxes twice (once when the money leaves the subsidiary and one more time when the money enters the US), many countries have Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs) with each other (colloquially known as tax treaties). These treaties govern which country has the right to levy the tax and to what rules they are bound. They can sometimes allow you to avoid paying withholding tax on dividends altogether, for example, allowing you to send dividends from a subsidiary in the Netherlands to your HQ in the US and pay $0%$.

Now, let's say you have another subsidiary in Zambia. Sending dividends from Zambia directly to the US would result in double taxation (once when the dividends leave Zambia and once when they arrive in the US), since Zambia doesn't have a DTA with the US. Hence you go to a tax advisor (or accountant) and he or she advises you to open a new subsidiary in France. Then you will send the money from Zambia to France and pay $0%$ and then from France to the US and again pay $0%$. By intelligently using your DTAs, you have basically reduced your effective tax burden to $0%$.

Now, there is a problem, however. These tax advisors and accountants typically rely on manual research and ingrained habits, often favoring common structures like a Dutch BV or Luxembourg Sàrl. This manual approach makes it impossible to analyze the thousands of bilateral tax treaties simultaneously to find the optimal, multi-jurisdictional route. With TreatyHopper I aim to solve this problem by modeling international tax law as a directed graph problem to computationally find the most cost-effective path.

Motivation

I stumbled upon this problem by sheer coincidence. I was reading an article in a major Dutch newspaper explaining how multinational corporations often make extensive use of Dutch DTAs through subsidiaries in the Netherlands. These subsidiaries funnel dividends from many countries around the world, using the Netherlands as a conduit to send the funds to the US. By using these DTAs, these corporations are able, in some cases, to lower their effective tax burden to as low as $0%$.

This intelligent selection process (determining which countries to route dividends through) is known as treaty shopping. This interesting phenomenon led me down the rabbit hole of international tax treaties. While I found a few academic papers rigorously explaining how treaty shopping works, literature regarding network analysis and optimization was very sparse. In fact, the existing network literature seemed to come mainly from two researchers who seem to be working on this exact same problem for the last 10+ years, though their goal is to eliminate the benefits provided by these tax treaties (and impose a minimum wealth tax, among other things).

To my surprise, despite potential savings reaching billions of dollars, no public optimization tool appeared to exist (at least to the best of my knowledge). Stemming from my background in Operations Research, I decided to focus on the optimization challenge: how can I efficiently route my dividends from a source to a destination country while paying the least amount of taxes?

Problem formulation

The simplest method for answering this question is to take a pragmatic approach: collect the data on tax treaties between countries using web agents, create a directed graph with the collected data, and run Dijkstra's algorithm to find an answer.

Web agents

First of all, I would like to mention that the project I undertook with TreatyHopper would have required significantly more time before the advent of agentic AI. Manually, finding all the relevant tax treaties, gathering the data, and parsing it into something meaningful would have taken so much time that I probably wouldn't have undertaken the project at all. Luckily, in the present day, we can use agentic AI to perform repetitive tasks for us.

I won't detail the process too much, as I used an online service instead of programming it from scratch. However, I essentially deployed an army of web agents (in the agentic AI sense) to collect data on DTAs, specifically focusing on the withholding tax rate on dividends.

The process resulted in the compilation of data on $5,000+$ tax treaties worldwide. This involved about $100$ source countries and $200$ destination countries (not all countries have treaties with each other, so there are not $100 \times 200 = 20,000$ values).

The highest withholding tax identified was $47%$, applied when moving dividends from Greece to Finland. Conversely, the lowest tax rates were $0%$, primarily for transactions originating from countries such as the Netherlands and Luxembourg, which are by some considered to be tax havens.

It is worth mentioning that these tax rates often differ based on the percentage of subsidiary ownership. For the sake of generalization, we assume that all intermediaries and the subsidiaries are wholly owned in the ownership path. This means the operating subsidiary is $100%$ owned by the first intermediary, which is $100%$ owned by the next, and so on, until the final intermediary is $100%$ owned by the HQ. We also ignore the costs associated with setting up such corporate structures.

Furthermore, governments around the world have introduced measures such as the general anti-avoidance rules (GAAR) and the principal purpose test (PPT). For now, for the sake of abstraction, we will ignore these measures (which I reckon, is a very strong assumption).

Data structure

Upon initial thought, my idea was to put all the data in an adjacency matrix with $100$ columns for the countries where the dividends were originating from and $200$ rows for the countries where they could be sent to. However, upon visual verification (and of course logical deduction), the adjacency matrix would have been extremely sparse ($20,000$ entries with about $15,000$ of them being NULL values). This is what some of the entries look like:

Screenshot 2025-12-10 at 19

Therefore I decided to use an edge list (see picture below) instead, which in our case has better space complexity than the adjacency matrix.

Screenshot 2025-12-10 at 19

Directed graph

We define a directed graph $G = (V, E)$. Here, $V$ represents the set of all jurisdictions in our data, and $E$ is the set of directed edges $(i, j)$ between jurisdiction $i$ and jurisdiction $j$ that have a DTA in our data. Note that DTAs are not necessarily symmetric. The tax rate for sending money from country $A$ to country $B$ often differs from the rate for sending money from $B$ to $A$.

Each directed edge $(i, j) \in E$ is assigned a non-negative weight (more on this later), $w_{ij}$, representing the cost of moving profits from jurisdiction $i$ to jurisdiction $j$.

We have a source $s \in V$, where our profits originate, and a destination $d \in V$, where our profits should ultimately reside.

Dijkstra's algorithm

Now that we have defined the components of this problem, we shall proceed with the most important part: the objective function. Truly what I am trying to achieve here is to find the method by which I retain the biggest part of my dividends when sending them from my subsidiaries to my HQ.

Let $r_{ij}$ be the withholding tax rate when sending dividends from jurisdiction $i$ to jurisdiction $j$. If the tax rate is $r_{ij}$, the fraction of the dividend I retain is $(1 - r_{ij})$.

We want to find the path $P$ that can look like $P = (s, v_1, v_2, \cdots, d)$ such that we maximize the retention of our dividends. The overall retention is the product of all retention factors along the path: $$ \text{Retention} = (1 - r_{s, 1}) \times (1 - r_{1, 2}) \times \cdots \times (1 - r_{k, d}) $$ In other words, we want to find the path $P$ that maximizes our objective function $Z$: $$ \max Z = {\prod_{(i,j) \in P} (1 - r_{ij})} $$

The additive transformation

Note that this formulation involves a product and a maximization. Recall that Dijkstra's algorithm only works on additive path costs (weights) with non-negative costs and is designed for minimization problems. Therefore, I must employ a smart trick to rewrite this problem as a minimization problem with additive weights.

The key mathematical property I use is the logarithm, which converts multiplication into addition ($\ln(A \times B) = \ln(A) + \ln(B)$). To transform the maximization into a minimization, I optimize for the negative logarithm of the objective function.

Minimizing $Z' = -\ln(Z)$ is mathematically equivalent to maximizing $Z$. Applying this to my objective: $$ \min Z' = - \ln \left( {\prod_{(i,j) \in P} (1 - r_{ij})} \right) $$ Using the logarithm rule for products, I can convert this into a sum: $$ \min Z' = - \sum_{(i,j) \in P} \ln (1 - r_{ij}) $$ This immediately yields the cost (weight) $w_{ij}$ for each edge $(i, j)$ in my network as the term within the summation: $$ w_{ij} = - \ln (1 - r_{ij}) $$ This brings us to the final, shortest-path compatible objective function: $$ \min Z' = \sum_{(i, j) \in P} w_{ij} $$

Verification of non-negativity

For Dijkstra's algorithm to work reliably, all weights $w_{ij}$ must be non-negative. Since tax rates are bound by $0 \leq r_{ij} < 1$, the retention factor $(1 - r_{ij})$ must be in the range $0 < 1 - r_{ij} \leq 1$. The natural logarithm of any number in this range is always zero or negative, $\ln (1 - r_{ij}) \leq 0$.

Since $w_{ij}$ is the negative of this value, $w_{ij} = - \ln (1 - r_{ij})$, it must be non-negative ($\geq 0$). The transformation is therefore valid for using Dijkstra's algorithm.

Solution

To keep things simple, I chose Next.js as the full stack framework for building a minimum viable product (MVP). Furthermore, I use Supabase for storing the edge list. Combining everything together and packaging it in a user-friendly interface, this led to the culmination of V0.0.1 of TreatyHopper:

Screenshot 2025-12-10 at 19

I shared the tool with a small initial group of users and have received some valuable feedback, and generally favorable reviews from them. If you are a startup, multinational corporation, tax advisor, accountant, or otherwise interested in using the tool or see other use cases that require some adjustments, feel free to contact me through this form.

Next steps

Thanks for reading this far! I really appreciate it. I have tried my absolute best to minimize the use of LLMs to write this text. Apart from improving my spelling, I haven't really used it. I hope it was an interesting read and please feel free to provide any feedback on this post. Now: what is next for TreatyHopper?

In the coming few weeks I intend to add the following features and address the following feedback:

  • I am currently working on a very early version of this tool utilizing Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to predict the risks associated with certain paths. For example, in general, the governments of some countries are stricter when it comes to the enforcement of countermeasures such as GAAR and PPT. It would be interesting to see if we can somehow predict the risk associated with repatriating profits through some of these countries.
  • Expand the tool to answer the following questions: how much of the profits are left after repatriating them? What happens if we limit the number of subsidiaries (e.g., we don't want to have a subsidiary in some countries)? Can we reduce the number of hops (i.e., intermediate jurisdictions in the route)? Note to self: see notes in notebook.
  • I am having a hard time verifying the data found by the web agents. It is inevitable that there are some mistakes in the data, as it is very hard to verify that the data found by the web agents is correct. Currently, I have randomly checked some of the numbers, and so far there seems to be about a mistake in around $5%$ of them. However, this is still a lot, and I am especially keen on reducing this to close to $0%$.
  • Add agent support for reasoning about certain routes and arguing about their soundness.
  • Remove sanctioned countries.
  • Improve parsing of data into Supabase.
  • Add a changelog.
  • Add a disclaimer before running the tool about the fact that it can still make some mistakes and that as of right now, the tool can be best used as a starting point for more advanced tax optimization.
  • Some people asked me why I didn't use the Floyd-Warshall algorithm. I could have used it, but to keep things simple, I opted for Dijkstra's algorithm. The main reason being that I need not necessarily calculate the shortest paths between all pairs of start and destination vertices.

Auto-grading decade-old Hacker News discussions with hindsight

2025-12-10 23:00:00

hnhero

TLDR: https://karpathy.ai/hncapsule/


Yesterday I stumbled on this HN thread Show HN: Gemini Pro 3 hallucinates the HN front page 10 years from now, where Gemini 3 was hallucinating the frontpage of 10 years from now. One of the comments struck me a bit more though - Bjartr linked to the HN frontpage from exactly 10 years ago, i.e. December 2015. I was reading through the discussions of 10 years ago and mentally grading them for prescience when I realized that an LLM might actually be a lot better at this task. I copy pasted one of the article+comment threads manually into ChatGPT 5.1 Thinking and it gave me a beautiful analysis of what people thought + what actually happened in retrospect, even better and significantly more detailed than what I was doing manually. I realized that this task is actually a really good fit for LLMs and I was looking for excuses to vibe code something with the newly released Opus 4.5, so I got to work. I'm going to get all the front pages of December (31 days, 30 articles per day), get ChatGPT 5.1 Thinking to do the analysis, and present everything in a nice way for historical reading.

There are two macro reasons for why I think the exercise is interesting more generally:

  1. I believe it is quite possible and desirable to train your forward future predictor given training and effort.
  2. I was reminded again of my tweets that said "Be good, future LLMs are watching". You can take that in many directions, but here I want to focus on the idea that future LLMs are watching. Everything we do today might be scrutinized in great detail in the future because doing so will be "free". A lot of the ways people behave currently I think make an implicit "security by obscurity" assumption. But if intelligence really does become too cheap to meter, it will become possible to do a perfect reconstruction and synthesis of everything. LLMs are watching (or humans using them might be). Best to be good.

Vibe coding the actual project was relatively painless and took about 3 hours with Opus 4.5, with a few hickups but overall very impressive. The repository is on GitHub here: karpathy/hn-time-capsule. Here is the progression of what the code does:

  • Given a date, download the frontpage of 30 articles
  • For each article, download/parse the article itself and the full comment thread using Algolia API.
  • Package up everything into a markdown prompt asking for the analysis. Here is the prompt prefix I used:
The following is an article that appeared on Hacker News 10 years ago, and the discussion thread.

Let's use our benefit of hindsight now in 6 sections:

1. Give a brief summary of the article and the discussion thread.
2. What ended up happening to this topic? (research the topic briefly and write a summary)
3. Give out awards for "Most prescient" and "Most wrong" comments, considering what happened.
4. Mention any other fun or notable aspects of the article or discussion.
5. Give out grades to specific people for their comments, considering what happened.
6. At the end, give a final score (from 0-10) for how interesting this article and its retrospect analysis was.

As for the format of Section 5, use the header "Final grades" and follow it with simply an unordered list of people and their grades in the format of "name: grade (optional comment)". Here is an example:

Final grades
- speckx: A+ (excellent predictions on ...)
- tosh: A (correctly predicted this or that ...)
- keepamovin: A
- bgwalter: D
- fsflover: F (completely wrong on ...)

Your list may contain more people of course than just this toy example. Please follow the format exactly because I will be parsing it programmatically. The idea is that I will accumulate the grades for each account to identify the accounts that were over long periods of time the most prescient or the most wrong.

As for the format of Section 6, use the prefix "Article hindsight analysis interestingness score:" and then the score (0-10) as a number. Give high scores to articles/discussions that are prominent, notable, or interesting in retrospect. Give low scores in cases where few predictions are made, or the topic is very niche or obscure, or the discussion is not very interesting in retrospect.

Here is an example:
Article hindsight analysis interestingness score: 8
---
  • Submit prompt to GPT 5.1 Thinking via the OpenAI API
  • Collect and parse the results
  • Render the results into static HTML web pages for easy viewing
  • Host the html result pages on my website: https://karpathy.ai/hncapsule/
  • Host all the intermediate results of the data directory if someone else would like to play. It's the file data.zip under the exact same url prefix (intentionally avoiding a direct link).

I spent a few hours browsing around and found it to be very interesting. A few example threads just for fun:

And then when you navigate over to the Hall of Fame, you can find the top commenters of Hacker News in December 2015, sorted by imdb-style score of their grade point average. In particular, congratulations to pcwalton, tptacek, paulmd, cstross, greglindahl, moxie, hannob, 0xcde4c3db, Manishearth, johncolanduoni - GPT 5.1 Thinking found your comments very insightful and prescient. You can also scroll all the way down to find the noise of HN, which I think we're all familiar with too :)

My code (wait, Opus' code?) on GitHub can be used to reproduce or tweak the results. Running 31 days of 30 articles through GPT 5.1 Thinking meant 31 * 30 = 930 LLM queries and cost about $58 and somewhere around ~1 hour. The LLM megaminds of the future might find this kind of a thing a lot easier, a lot faster and a lot cheaper.

50 States of Folklore: Florida - Robert the Doll

2025-12-10 01:24:00

Behind glass in a Key West museum, a life-sized doll in a sailor suit stares back with painted eyes that never seem quite still. Staff warn visitors to ask Robert’s permission before taking his photo, and the walls around him are lined with apology letters from people who say their lives fell apart after they laughed, mocked, or ignored the rules. We trace Robert the Doll’s path from a strange childhood companion to an object blamed for accidents, breakups, and streaks of brutal bad luck. Listen closely, and decide if you’d dare stand in front of him without saying “please.”


If you liked this Signal, follow Midnight Signals on your favorite app →

Full Episode Details

Transcript

1 00:00:05,080 --> 00:00:09,640 At 3:17 AM on a Tuesday night in March, security cameras at the

2 00:00:09,640 --> 00:00:12,640 East Martello Museum in Key West captured something that

3 00:00:12,640 --> 00:00:16,040 shouldn't have been possible. The footage shows Robert the

4 00:00:16,040 --> 00:00:19,960 doll, sitting motionless in his glass case for hours, suddenly

5 00:00:19,960 --> 00:00:21,520 turning his head toward the camera.

6 00:00:21,960 --> 00:00:24,200 The movement was subtle but unmistakable.

7 00:00:24,560 --> 00:00:27,560 By morning, three staff members had called in sick.

8 00:00:28,080 --> 00:00:30,640 This wasn't the first time Robert had made his presence

9 00:00:30,640 --> 00:00:33,680 known. For over a century, this 3 foot

10 00:00:33,680 --> 00:00:37,200 tall sailor suited doll has terrorized anyone who dares to

11 00:00:37,200 --> 00:00:40,320 disrespect him. Today, the museum receives

12 00:00:40,320 --> 00:00:43,320 hundreds of apology letters each year from visitors around the

13 00:00:43,320 --> 00:00:46,080 world, all begging Robert to lift his curse.

14 00:00:46,600 --> 00:00:49,880 Their stories share disturbing similarities, broken cameras,

15 00:00:49,960 --> 00:00:54,560 car accidents, sudden illnesses, financial ruin, and inexplicable

16 00:00:54,560 --> 00:00:56,920 misfortune that begins the moment they photograph him

17 00:00:56,920 --> 00:00:59,760 without permission. But Robert's reign of terror

18 00:00:59,760 --> 00:01:04,000 didn't begin in a museum. It started in 19 O six in a

19 00:01:04,000 --> 00:01:07,680 grand Key West mansion when a six year old boy received what

20 00:01:07,680 --> 00:01:11,160 seemed like an innocent gift. The woman who created Robert

21 00:01:11,160 --> 00:01:14,960 knew exactly what she was doing. She wove something dark into his

22 00:01:14,960 --> 00:01:18,200 fabric, something that would bind him to this world long

23 00:01:18,200 --> 00:01:21,320 after she disappeared. What she left behind was more

24 00:01:21,320 --> 00:01:23,800 than a doll. She left behind a curse that

25 00:01:23,800 --> 00:01:27,800 refuses to die. Robert Eugene Otto was born into

26 00:01:27,800 --> 00:01:31,840 privilege in 1900, the son of a wealthy Key West family whose

27 00:01:31,840 --> 00:01:34,000 fortune came from shipping and real estate.

28 00:01:34,960 --> 00:01:37,960 The Otto Mansion on Eaton St. stood as a testament to their

29 00:01:37,960 --> 00:01:41,200 success, it's Victorian architecture and sprawling

30 00:01:41,200 --> 00:01:43,840 grounds marking them as one of the island's most prominent

31 00:01:43,840 --> 00:01:46,520 families. Like many wealthy households of

32 00:01:46,520 --> 00:01:50,600 the era, the Ottos employed several Bahamian servants, women

33 00:01:50,600 --> 00:01:53,400 who had traveled from the nearby islands seeking work in the

34 00:01:53,400 --> 00:01:57,480 prosperous American territory. Among these servants was a woman

35 00:01:57,480 --> 00:02:01,080 whose name has been lost to history, but whose legacy lives

36 00:02:01,080 --> 00:02:03,640 on in the supernatural terror she created.

37 00:02:04,160 --> 00:02:07,240 Historical accounts describe her as skilled in the traditional

38 00:02:07,240 --> 00:02:11,080 practices of her homeland, including knowledge of obeah, a

39 00:02:11,080 --> 00:02:14,320 form of folk magic and spiritual practice common throughout the

40 00:02:14,320 --> 00:02:16,960 Caribbean. The exact nature of her

41 00:02:16,960 --> 00:02:20,320 relationship with the Otto family remains unclear, but

42 00:02:20,320 --> 00:02:23,640 local folklore suggests she was mistreated by her employers,

43 00:02:23,800 --> 00:02:27,160 subjected to the casual cruelty that wealthy families often

44 00:02:27,160 --> 00:02:29,200 inflicted upon their domestic staff.

45 00:02:29,800 --> 00:02:34,480 In 19 O 6, when young Robert Eugene Otto turned 6 years old,

46 00:02:34,920 --> 00:02:38,080 this servant presented him with what appeared to be a generous

47 00:02:38,080 --> 00:02:40,800 farewell gift. She had crafted the doll

48 00:02:40,800 --> 00:02:44,240 herself, using materials that told a disturbing story.

49 00:02:45,040 --> 00:02:48,640 The doll stood 3 feet tall, dressed in a white sailor suit

50 00:02:48,640 --> 00:02:50,720 that had once belonged to Robert himself.

51 00:02:51,320 --> 00:02:54,680 Its face was painted with an unsettling expression, neither

52 00:02:54,680 --> 00:02:58,400 fully smiling nor frowning, but caught in an ambiguous state

53 00:02:58,400 --> 00:03:01,040 that seemed to shift depending on the viewer's angle.

54 00:03:01,480 --> 00:03:04,360 Most disturbing of all, the servant had woven some of

55 00:03:04,360 --> 00:03:07,280 Robert's own hair into the doll's scalp, creating a

56 00:03:07,280 --> 00:03:09,960 physical connection between boy and creation.

57 00:03:10,400 --> 00:03:13,800 The servant's departure from the Otto household was as mysterious

58 00:03:13,800 --> 00:03:16,840 as her gift. Some accounts suggest she left

59 00:03:16,840 --> 00:03:20,600 voluntarily after presenting the doll, while others claim she was

60 00:03:20,600 --> 00:03:24,280 dismissed by the family. What remains consistent across

61 00:03:24,280 --> 00:03:27,560 all versions is that she vanished from Key West entirely,

62 00:03:27,880 --> 00:03:30,960 leaving no trace of where she went or what became of her.

63 00:03:31,400 --> 00:03:34,360 The only evidence of her time with the Ottos was the doll she

64 00:03:34,360 --> 00:03:37,920 left behind and the strange occurrences that began almost

65 00:03:37,920 --> 00:03:40,880 immediately. Young Robert was delighted with

66 00:03:40,880 --> 00:03:43,720 his new companion, whom he named after himself.

67 00:03:44,640 --> 00:03:48,200 He carried the doll everywhere, speaking to it in hushed tones

68 00:03:48,200 --> 00:03:50,400 and treating it as his closest confidant.

69 00:03:51,280 --> 00:03:54,640 His parents initially found this behavior charming, the natural

70 00:03:54,640 --> 00:03:58,200 attachment of a child to a beloved toy, but their amusement

71 00:03:58,200 --> 00:04:00,880 quickly turned to concern when Robert began claiming that the

72 00:04:00,880 --> 00:04:04,560 doll spoke back to him. Late at night, the Otto parents

73 00:04:04,560 --> 00:04:08,360 would hear 2 distinct voices coming from their son's room. 1

74 00:04:08,360 --> 00:04:11,960 was clearly Roberts high pitched child's voice, but the other was

75 00:04:11,960 --> 00:04:16,000 different, deeper and more mature, speaking in tones that

76 00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:18,640 seemed impossible for a six year old to produce.

77 00:04:19,279 --> 00:04:22,200 When they investigated, they would find Robert sitting with

78 00:04:22,200 --> 00:04:25,200 his doll, insisting that his namesake had been telling him

79 00:04:25,200 --> 00:04:28,560 stories about faraway places and people he had never met.

80 00:04:29,040 --> 00:04:31,680 The neighbors began to notice something strange as well.

81 00:04:32,200 --> 00:04:35,000 When the Otto family was away from home, residents of the

82 00:04:35,000 --> 00:04:37,640 surrounding houses reported seeing the doll silhouette

83 00:04:37,640 --> 00:04:40,880 moving from window to window throughout the empty mansion, as

84 00:04:40,880 --> 00:04:42,920 if it were exploring the rooms on its own.

85 00:04:43,840 --> 00:04:46,800 The first sign that something was deeply wrong came on a humid

86 00:04:46,800 --> 00:04:51,760 August morning in 19 O 7, Robert's mother, Elizabeth Otto,

87 00:04:52,040 --> 00:04:54,520 discovered the boy's room in complete disarray.

88 00:04:55,120 --> 00:04:58,080 Furniture had been overturned, books scattered across the

89 00:04:58,080 --> 00:05:01,240 floor, and his collection of toy soldiers arranged in what

90 00:05:01,240 --> 00:05:02,960 appeared to be battle formations.

91 00:05:03,560 --> 00:05:06,760 When she confronted her son about the destruction, 6 year

92 00:05:06,760 --> 00:05:09,920 old Robert looked up at her with wide, innocent eyes and spoke

93 00:05:09,920 --> 00:05:12,760 the words that would haunt the Otto household for decades to

94 00:05:12,760 --> 00:05:14,680 come. Robert did it.

95 00:05:15,840 --> 00:05:19,440 At first, Elizabeth assumed her son was simply refusing to take

96 00:05:19,440 --> 00:05:23,000 responsibility for his mischief, referring to himself in the

97 00:05:23,000 --> 00:05:25,360 third person, as many young children do.

98 00:05:26,200 --> 00:05:29,000 But when she pressed him further, young Robert pointed

99 00:05:29,000 --> 00:05:31,640 directly at the doll sitting in the corner of his room and

100 00:05:31,640 --> 00:05:33,640 repeated with absolute conviction.

101 00:05:33,920 --> 00:05:36,880 Robert did it. He gets angry when people don't

102 00:05:36,880 --> 00:05:40,080 listen to him. The incidents escalated with

103 00:05:40,080 --> 00:05:43,120 alarming frequency. Kitchen utensils would be found

104 00:05:43,120 --> 00:05:46,000 arranged in strange patterns on the dining room table.

105 00:05:46,520 --> 00:05:49,480 Family photographs would be discovered turned face down in

106 00:05:49,480 --> 00:05:52,240 their frames. The households prized China

107 00:05:52,240 --> 00:05:55,320 would crash to the floor in the middle of the night, despite

108 00:05:55,320 --> 00:05:57,240 being secured in locked cabinets.

109 00:05:58,120 --> 00:06:01,400 Each time, young Robert would offer the same explanation.

110 00:06:01,800 --> 00:06:06,040 The doll was responsible. The Otto family's domestic staff

111 00:06:06,040 --> 00:06:08,520 began to whisper among themselves about the strange

112 00:06:08,520 --> 00:06:10,760 atmosphere that had settled over the mansion.

113 00:06:11,520 --> 00:06:15,480 Maria Santos, the family's longtime housekeeper, later told

114 00:06:15,480 --> 00:06:18,480 her daughter that she could feel the dolls glass eyes following

115 00:06:18,480 --> 00:06:20,160 her as she moved through the rooms.

116 00:06:20,640 --> 00:06:24,080 She described an oppressive sensation, as if the air itself

117 00:06:24,080 --> 00:06:27,080 had grown thick and watchful whenever the doll was present.

118 00:06:27,680 --> 00:06:30,840 Other servants reported hearing the sound of small footsteps in

119 00:06:30,840 --> 00:06:34,600 empty hallways and the Creek of floorboards in unoccupied rooms.

120 00:06:35,120 --> 00:06:38,400 The breaking point came when the family's cook, a woman who had

121 00:06:38,400 --> 00:06:41,800 worked for the Ottos for over a decade, abruptly quit her

122 00:06:41,800 --> 00:06:45,920 position without explanation. She was found the next morning,

123 00:06:45,920 --> 00:06:49,000 standing at the end of the driveway, her belongings packed

124 00:06:49,000 --> 00:06:52,280 in a single suitcase, staring back at the house with a look of

125 00:06:52,320 --> 00:06:55,760 absolute terror. When Elizabeth Otto approached

126 00:06:55,760 --> 00:06:58,720 her to ask what had happened, the woman simply shook her head

127 00:06:58,720 --> 00:07:01,720 and walked away, never to return to the Otto household.

128 00:07:02,600 --> 00:07:05,480 Word of the strange occurrences began to spread throughout Key

129 00:07:05,480 --> 00:07:07,880 West. Tight knit community family

130 00:07:07,880 --> 00:07:10,400 friends who had once been regular visitors to the Otto

131 00:07:10,400 --> 00:07:13,360 mansion started declining invitations to dinner parties

132 00:07:13,360 --> 00:07:16,520 and social gatherings. Those who did brave a visit

133 00:07:16,520 --> 00:07:20,240 reported feeling an overwhelming sense of unease, particularly

134 00:07:20,240 --> 00:07:22,640 when in the presence of young Robert and his doll.

135 00:07:23,440 --> 00:07:26,200 Children who came to play with Robert would leave in tears,

136 00:07:26,440 --> 00:07:28,920 claiming that the doll had whispered threats to them when

137 00:07:28,920 --> 00:07:32,800 the adults weren't looking. Doctor Samuel Mitchell, the

138 00:07:32,800 --> 00:07:36,080 family physician, documented his concerns about Roberts

139 00:07:36,080 --> 00:07:38,960 increasingly erratic behavior in his private notes.

140 00:07:39,840 --> 00:07:42,640 The boy had begun speaking in voices that didn't sound like

141 00:07:42,640 --> 00:07:46,280 his own, using vocabulary and expressions far beyond his

142 00:07:46,280 --> 00:07:48,840 years. During one particularly

143 00:07:48,840 --> 00:07:52,040 disturbing visit, Doctor Mitchell observed Robert having

144 00:07:52,040 --> 00:07:55,720 an animated conversation with the doll, complete with pauses,

145 00:07:55,720 --> 00:07:58,480 as if listening to responses that only he could hear.

146 00:07:58,880 --> 00:08:02,040 When the doctor attempted to examine the doll, Robert became

147 00:08:02,040 --> 00:08:05,080 violent, screaming that no one was allowed to touch his friend

148 00:08:05,080 --> 00:08:08,480 without permission. The Otto parents made several

149 00:08:08,480 --> 00:08:11,000 desperate attempts to remove the doll from their home.

150 00:08:11,480 --> 00:08:14,400 They tried hiding it in the attic, donating it to local

151 00:08:14,400 --> 00:08:17,600 charities, and even burning it in the backyard fireplace.

152 00:08:18,440 --> 00:08:21,400 Each time, the doll would mysteriously reappear in

153 00:08:21,400 --> 00:08:25,080 Robert's room by morning, sitting in its usual spot as if

154 00:08:25,080 --> 00:08:28,600 it had never been disturbed. Young Robert would greet these

155 00:08:28,600 --> 00:08:32,080 returns with delight, chatting excitedly with the doll about

156 00:08:32,080 --> 00:08:34,960 where it had been and what it had seen during its absence.

157 00:08:35,440 --> 00:08:38,440 The psychological toll on the family became impossible to

158 00:08:38,440 --> 00:08:41,240 ignore. Elizabeth Otto developed chronic

159 00:08:41,240 --> 00:08:44,280 insomnia, claiming she could hear the doll moving around the

160 00:08:44,280 --> 00:08:47,760 house at night. Thomas Otto, Robert's father,

161 00:08:47,880 --> 00:08:50,400 began drinking heavily and spending long hours at his

162 00:08:50,400 --> 00:08:54,320 office to avoid coming home. The family social standing in

163 00:08:54,320 --> 00:08:56,840 Key West society crumbled as rumors of their haunted

164 00:08:56,840 --> 00:08:58,760 household spread throughout the community.

165 00:08:59,320 --> 00:09:02,440 As Robert grew older, his attachment to the doll only

166 00:09:02,440 --> 00:09:05,480 intensified. Even as he entered his teenage

167 00:09:05,480 --> 00:09:08,280 years, he refused to be separated from his supernatural

168 00:09:08,280 --> 00:09:10,840 companion. The doll had become more than a

169 00:09:10,840 --> 00:09:15,000 childhood toy, it had become the dominant force in Robert's life,

170 00:09:15,320 --> 00:09:18,520 dictating his behavior and isolating him from normal human

171 00:09:18,520 --> 00:09:21,560 relationships. The servants revenge was

172 00:09:21,560 --> 00:09:25,000 complete, but the curse she had woven into that sailor suited

173 00:09:25,000 --> 00:09:27,880 figure was only beginning to reveal its true power.

174 00:09:28,440 --> 00:09:32,200 By the time Robert Eugene Otto reached adulthood, the doll had

175 00:09:32,200 --> 00:09:34,440 shaped every aspect of his existence.

176 00:09:35,120 --> 00:09:38,280 Despite his family's wealth and his own considerable artistic

177 00:09:38,280 --> 00:09:41,720 talents, Robert remained A deeply isolated figure in Key

178 00:09:41,720 --> 00:09:44,200 West society. He had developed into an

179 00:09:44,200 --> 00:09:47,400 accomplished painter and writer, creating works that captured the

180 00:09:47,400 --> 00:09:49,800 unique culture and history of the Florida Keys.

181 00:09:50,240 --> 00:09:52,400 But his success came at a terrible price.

182 00:09:52,920 --> 00:09:55,800 The doll that had terrorized his childhood had evolved into

183 00:09:55,800 --> 00:09:59,600 something far more sinister, his creative muse and spiritual

184 00:09:59,600 --> 00:10:04,160 master. In 1930, Robert married Anne, a

185 00:10:04,160 --> 00:10:07,040 woman from a prominent Boston family who had fallen in love

186 00:10:07,040 --> 00:10:10,080 with both his artistic vision and his mysterious, brooding

187 00:10:10,080 --> 00:10:13,320 personality. Anne Otto was an educated,

188 00:10:13,320 --> 00:10:16,240 strong willed woman who initially dismissed the stories

189 00:10:16,240 --> 00:10:19,160 about her husband's unusual relationship with his childhood

190 00:10:19,160 --> 00:10:22,520 doll as local folklore and harmless eccentricity.

191 00:10:23,360 --> 00:10:26,280 She would soon discover that the residents of Key West had been

192 00:10:26,280 --> 00:10:29,120 trying to warn her about something genuinely dangerous.

193 00:10:29,560 --> 00:10:32,160 Robert installed his doll in the turret room of the family

194 00:10:32,160 --> 00:10:36,320 mansion, creating what he called his studio space, but what Anne

195 00:10:36,320 --> 00:10:39,680 quickly recognized as a shrine. The room was filled with

196 00:10:39,680 --> 00:10:43,600 paintings that featured the doll as their central subject, dozens

197 00:10:43,600 --> 00:10:47,480 of canvases depicting the sailor suited figure in various poses

198 00:10:47,480 --> 00:10:50,360 and settings. Some paintings showed the doll

199 00:10:50,360 --> 00:10:53,880 sitting peacefully in gardens or by the ocean, but others

200 00:10:53,880 --> 00:10:56,000 revealed A darker artistic vision.

201 00:10:56,480 --> 00:11:00,280 In these disturbing works, the doll appeared to be moving, it's

202 00:11:00,280 --> 00:11:03,600 painted eyes gleaming with malevolent intelligence, it's

203 00:11:03,600 --> 00:11:06,960 small hands reaching toward the viewer as if trying to escape

204 00:11:06,960 --> 00:11:10,960 the confines of the canvas. Anne's first encounter with the

205 00:11:10,960 --> 00:11:13,680 doll supernatural nature occurred during their honeymoon

206 00:11:13,680 --> 00:11:16,520 period, when she was still adjusting to life in the Otto

207 00:11:16,520 --> 00:11:19,080 mansion. She had gone to the turret room

208 00:11:19,080 --> 00:11:21,640 to call Robert for dinner when she noticed that the dolls

209 00:11:21,640 --> 00:11:23,800 position had changed since her last visit.

210 00:11:24,560 --> 00:11:26,680 Where it had been sitting upright in its chair that

211 00:11:26,680 --> 00:11:30,440 morning, it now slouched to one side, its head tilted at an

212 00:11:30,440 --> 00:11:33,480 unnatural angle. When she mentioned this to

213 00:11:33,480 --> 00:11:36,720 Robert, he flew into a rage unlike anything she had ever

214 00:11:36,720 --> 00:11:40,000 witnessed, screaming that no one was permitted to disturb his

215 00:11:40,000 --> 00:11:44,040 friend or question its behavior. The dolls influence over

216 00:11:44,040 --> 00:11:46,960 Robert's artistic work became increasingly apparent as the

217 00:11:46,960 --> 00:11:49,800 years passed. His paintings grew darker and

218 00:11:49,800 --> 00:11:52,920 more disturbing, filled with occult symbolism and hidden

219 00:11:52,920 --> 00:11:55,960 messages that seem to come from a source beyond his conscious

220 00:11:55,960 --> 00:11:58,760 mind. Art critics who visited the Auto

221 00:11:58,760 --> 00:12:01,680 Home to view his work reported feeling physically ill in the

222 00:12:01,680 --> 00:12:04,240 presence of both the paintings and the doll itself.

223 00:12:04,800 --> 00:12:07,680 Several prominent collectors who had initially shown interest in

224 00:12:07,680 --> 00:12:10,520 purchasing Robert's work changed their minds after spending time

225 00:12:10,520 --> 00:12:13,120 in the turret room, claiming they felt as though they were

226 00:12:13,120 --> 00:12:17,120 being watched by something malevolent, and documented her

227 00:12:17,120 --> 00:12:20,520 growing horror in letters to her sister in Boston describing how

228 00:12:20,520 --> 00:12:22,960 her husband would spend entire nights in the turret room

229 00:12:23,400 --> 00:12:26,000 carrying on animated conversations with the doll.

230 00:12:26,680 --> 00:12:29,600 She could hear 2 distinct voices through the closed door,

231 00:12:30,080 --> 00:12:32,680 Robert's familiar tone and another voice that seemed to

232 00:12:32,680 --> 00:12:34,520 come from somewhere else entirely.

233 00:12:35,400 --> 00:12:38,040 When she pressed her ear to the door, she could make out

234 00:12:38,040 --> 00:12:41,040 fragments of these conversations, discussions about

235 00:12:41,040 --> 00:12:44,200 people the doll claimed to have known in previous decades, and

236 00:12:44,200 --> 00:12:47,080 places it insisted it had visited during its nocturnal

237 00:12:47,080 --> 00:12:49,800 wanderings. The breaking point in their

238 00:12:49,800 --> 00:12:52,280 marriage came when Anne discovered Robert painting in

239 00:12:52,280 --> 00:12:55,280 the early hours of the morning, working on a canvas that

240 00:12:55,280 --> 00:12:58,720 depicted her own death. The painting showed her lying in

241 00:12:58,720 --> 00:13:03,000 their bedroom, her face peaceful but unmistakably lifeless, while

242 00:13:03,000 --> 00:13:06,040 the doll sat nearby with what appeared to be a satisfied

243 00:13:06,040 --> 00:13:09,160 expression. When she confronted Robert about

244 00:13:09,160 --> 00:13:12,360 this macabre creation, he claimed no memory of painting

245 00:13:12,360 --> 00:13:15,800 it, insisting that he had found the completed work on his easel

246 00:13:15,800 --> 00:13:18,520 that morning. The doll, he explained, had been

247 00:13:18,520 --> 00:13:22,080 teaching him about the future. Visitors to the auto home during

248 00:13:22,080 --> 00:13:25,240 this period left behind accounts that read like horror stories.

249 00:13:25,840 --> 00:13:29,040 Doctor Richard Pemberton, a psychiatrist who had been called

250 00:13:29,040 --> 00:13:32,200 to evaluate Roberts mental state, described feeling an

251 00:13:32,200 --> 00:13:34,760 overwhelming sense of dread whenever he entered the turret

252 00:13:34,760 --> 00:13:36,800 room. Electronic equipment would

253 00:13:36,800 --> 00:13:39,680 malfunction in the Dolls presence, cameras would refuse

254 00:13:39,680 --> 00:13:42,520 to function, and recording devices would produce only

255 00:13:42,520 --> 00:13:45,480 static. Most disturbing of all, Doctor

256 00:13:45,480 --> 00:13:48,280 Pemberton reported that the Dolls facial expression seemed

257 00:13:48,280 --> 00:13:51,480 to change depending on who was looking at it, shifting from

258 00:13:51,480 --> 00:13:55,000 benign to threatening in ways that defied logical explanation.

259 00:13:55,760 --> 00:13:58,560 The Dolls supernatural influence extended beyond the Otto

260 00:13:58,560 --> 00:14:01,440 household. Neighbors reported seeing lights

261 00:14:01,440 --> 00:14:04,040 moving through the turret room windows at all hours of the

262 00:14:04,040 --> 00:14:06,880 night, even when the family was known to be away.

263 00:14:07,480 --> 00:14:10,080 Children walking past the mansion on their way to school

264 00:14:10,080 --> 00:14:13,080 would cross to the other side of the street, claiming they could

265 00:14:13,080 --> 00:14:15,600 feel something watching them from the upper floors.

266 00:14:16,320 --> 00:14:19,800 Local delivery men refused to approach the front door, leaving

267 00:14:19,800 --> 00:14:22,640 packages at the garden gate rather than risk an encounter

268 00:14:22,640 --> 00:14:25,240 with whatever presence haunted the Victorian mansion.

269 00:14:26,160 --> 00:14:29,080 Anne's health began to deteriorate under the constant

270 00:14:29,080 --> 00:14:32,360 stress of living with both her increasingly unstable husband

271 00:14:32,360 --> 00:14:36,040 and his demonic companion. She developed severe anxiety,

272 00:14:36,200 --> 00:14:39,000 chronic headaches, and a persistent feeling that she was

273 00:14:39,000 --> 00:14:43,160 being observed even when alone. Her attempts to convince Robert

274 00:14:43,160 --> 00:14:46,000 to seek help or remove the doll from their home were met with

275 00:14:46,000 --> 00:14:49,080 violent resistance. He had become completely

276 00:14:49,080 --> 00:14:52,760 dependent on his supernatural muse, unable to create art or

277 00:14:52,760 --> 00:14:55,400 make decisions without consulting the malevolent spirit

278 00:14:55,400 --> 00:14:57,400 that inhabited the sailor suited figure.

279 00:14:58,440 --> 00:15:03,200 When Robert Eugene Otto died in 1974, Anne's first act as a

280 00:15:03,200 --> 00:15:05,920 widow was to contact the East Martello Museum.

281 00:15:06,480 --> 00:15:09,080 She donated the doll immediately, along with a

282 00:15:09,080 --> 00:15:11,560 written warning about its dangerous supernatural

283 00:15:11,560 --> 00:15:15,360 properties. Anne fled Key West within days

284 00:15:15,360 --> 00:15:18,680 of her husband's funeral, never to return to the island that had

285 00:15:18,680 --> 00:15:21,480 become her prison. The doll had claimed its first

286 00:15:21,480 --> 00:15:24,600 victim, but its appetite for destruction was far from

287 00:15:24,600 --> 00:15:27,440 satisfied. When the East Martello Museum

288 00:15:27,440 --> 00:15:31,800 acquired Robert the Doll in 1994, twenty years after Anne

289 00:15:31,800 --> 00:15:35,480 Otto's desperate donation, the staff had no idea they were

290 00:15:35,480 --> 00:15:38,440 inheriting one of the most actively haunted objects in

291 00:15:38,440 --> 00:15:41,480 America. The museum, housed in a Civil

292 00:15:41,480 --> 00:15:45,320 War era Fort on the southern tip of Key West, seemed like the

293 00:15:45,320 --> 00:15:48,640 perfect place to display local historical artifacts.

294 00:15:49,080 --> 00:15:53,120 Robert was initially treated as just another curiosity, a piece

295 00:15:53,120 --> 00:15:56,160 of Key West folklore that would attract tourists interested in

296 00:15:56,160 --> 00:16:00,280 the island's eccentric past. The museum's first curator,

297 00:16:00,360 --> 00:16:03,440 Margaret Sawyer, later admitted that she had dismissed Anne

298 00:16:03,440 --> 00:16:06,400 Otto's warnings as the ramblings of a grief stricken widow.

299 00:16:07,000 --> 00:16:09,680 The detailed letter that accompanied the dolls donation

300 00:16:09,680 --> 00:16:12,960 described decades of supernatural terror, but Sawyer

301 00:16:12,960 --> 00:16:16,280 filed it away as an interesting piece of local legend rather

302 00:16:16,280 --> 00:16:19,440 than a genuine warning. She would soon discover that

303 00:16:19,440 --> 00:16:22,400 Anne Otto had been trying to save them from making a terrible

304 00:16:22,400 --> 00:16:24,960 mistake. The museum staff decided to

305 00:16:24,960 --> 00:16:28,160 display Robert in a prominent glass case on the 2nd floor,

306 00:16:28,520 --> 00:16:31,840 surrounded by information about Key West, maritime history and

307 00:16:31,840 --> 00:16:34,320 the Otto family's role in the island's development.

308 00:16:34,840 --> 00:16:37,320 They created a small placard that mentioned the dolls

309 00:16:37,320 --> 00:16:40,880 reputation for being haunted, treating it as a charming local

310 00:16:40,880 --> 00:16:43,200 superstition that would add color to the exhibit.

311 00:16:43,680 --> 00:16:46,720 What they didn't anticipate was that placing Robert on public

312 00:16:46,720 --> 00:16:49,840 display would amplify his supernatural powers rather than

313 00:16:49,840 --> 00:16:52,680 contain them. Within weeks of the exhibits

314 00:16:52,680 --> 00:16:56,200 opening, strange incidents began occurring throughout the museum.

315 00:16:56,760 --> 00:16:59,880 Security guards reported hearing the sound of small footsteps

316 00:16:59,880 --> 00:17:02,840 echoing through the empty halls during their overnight shifts.

317 00:17:03,240 --> 00:17:06,560 Motion sensors would trigger without explanation, setting off

318 00:17:06,560 --> 00:17:09,640 alarms in areas where no living person could be detected.

319 00:17:10,319 --> 00:17:13,280 Most disturbing of all, the security camera's position

320 00:17:13,280 --> 00:17:16,079 throughout the museum began capturing footage that defied

321 00:17:16,079 --> 00:17:19,040 rational explanation. The first documented

322 00:17:19,040 --> 00:17:22,200 supernatural incident occurred on a Tuesday morning in October

323 00:17:22,200 --> 00:17:25,359 1994. When staff members arrived to

324 00:17:25,359 --> 00:17:28,720 open the museum, they discovered that Robert had somehow moved

325 00:17:28,720 --> 00:17:32,080 within his locked glass case where he had been sitting

326 00:17:32,080 --> 00:17:35,680 upright the previous evening. He was now slumped forward, his

327 00:17:35,680 --> 00:17:38,560 painted face pressed against the glass as if he had been trying

328 00:17:38,560 --> 00:17:41,520 to escape. The case showed no signs of

329 00:17:41,520 --> 00:17:44,520 tampering and the security footage from the night before

330 00:17:44,520 --> 00:17:47,800 showed only darkness, punctuated by brief moments when the doll

331 00:17:47,800 --> 00:17:51,640 appeared to shift position. Museum director James Hartley

332 00:17:51,640 --> 00:17:54,880 initially blamed these incidents on settling in the old building

333 00:17:54,880 --> 00:17:57,160 or vibrations from nearby construction.

334 00:17:57,560 --> 00:18:00,680 But as the reports multiplied, he was forced to confront the

335 00:18:00,680 --> 00:18:03,560 possibility that something genuinely supernatural was

336 00:18:03,560 --> 00:18:06,560 occurring. Staff members began refusing to

337 00:18:06,560 --> 00:18:09,520 work alone in the building, particularly during evening

338 00:18:09,520 --> 00:18:12,200 hours when the dolls activity seemed to intensify.

339 00:18:13,040 --> 00:18:15,800 The breakthrough moment came when the museum established a

340 00:18:15,800 --> 00:18:18,480 simple rule that would become Robert's most famous

341 00:18:18,480 --> 00:18:21,960 characteristic. Visitors must ask his permission

342 00:18:21,960 --> 00:18:25,480 before taking photographs. This policy emerged from the

343 00:18:25,480 --> 00:18:29,680 observations of longtime staff member Patricia Rodriguez, who

344 00:18:29,680 --> 00:18:32,080 noticed that visitors who photographed the doll without

345 00:18:32,080 --> 00:18:34,720 acknowledgement seem to experience immediate technical

346 00:18:34,720 --> 00:18:37,520 difficulties. Cameras would malfunction,

347 00:18:37,760 --> 00:18:41,360 memory cards would corrupt, and electronic devices would drain

348 00:18:41,360 --> 00:18:44,080 their batteries within minutes of entering Robert's presence.

349 00:18:45,120 --> 00:18:48,200 The museum began documenting these incidents systematically,

350 00:18:48,560 --> 00:18:51,880 creating a log of supernatural encounters that grew longer each

351 00:18:51,880 --> 00:18:54,400 month. Visitors reported that their

352 00:18:54,400 --> 00:18:57,400 digital cameras would display error messages when pointed at

353 00:18:57,400 --> 00:19:00,520 Robert, even when the same devices function perfectly

354 00:19:00,520 --> 00:19:03,760 elsewhere in the museum. Film cameras would produce

355 00:19:03,760 --> 00:19:06,920 photographs that showed strange shadows or unexplained lights

356 00:19:06,920 --> 00:19:10,160 surrounding the doll, even when taken in broad daylight with

357 00:19:10,160 --> 00:19:12,920 proper lighting. But the technical malfunctions

358 00:19:12,920 --> 00:19:15,800 were only the beginning of Robert's modern reign of terror.

359 00:19:16,840 --> 00:19:19,160 Visitors who ignored the museum's warnings and

360 00:19:19,160 --> 00:19:22,040 photographed the doll without permission began reporting a

361 00:19:22,040 --> 00:19:24,640 cascade of misfortunes that followed them home.

362 00:19:25,400 --> 00:19:27,440 The pattern was remarkably consistent.

363 00:19:27,800 --> 00:19:31,440 Within days or weeks of their museum visit, these individuals

364 00:19:31,440 --> 00:19:34,400 would experience a series of increasingly severe problems

365 00:19:34,400 --> 00:19:38,040 that seemed to defy coincidence. The first wave of apology

366 00:19:38,040 --> 00:19:42,480 letters arrived at the museum in 1995, just one year after Robert

367 00:19:42,480 --> 00:19:45,720 went on display. These initial correspondences

368 00:19:45,720 --> 00:19:49,000 were tentative, almost embarrassed, written by visitors

369 00:19:49,000 --> 00:19:52,000 who felt foolish for believing in supernatural curses but were

370 00:19:52,000 --> 00:19:54,840 desperate enough to try anything to stop their streak of bad

371 00:19:54,840 --> 00:19:57,640 luck. A businessman from Miami wrote

372 00:19:57,640 --> 00:20:00,560 that his company had lost three major contracts in the weeks

373 00:20:00,560 --> 00:20:03,120 following his unauthorized photograph of Robert.

374 00:20:03,720 --> 00:20:06,840 A family from Orlando described a series of car troubles,

375 00:20:07,160 --> 00:20:09,920 medical emergencies and household accidents that had

376 00:20:09,920 --> 00:20:12,240 begun the day after their Key West vacation.

377 00:20:12,840 --> 00:20:15,640 Museum staff initially treated these letters as amusing

378 00:20:15,640 --> 00:20:19,720 coincidences, filing them away as examples of how superstition

379 00:20:19,720 --> 00:20:21,520 could take hold in people's minds.

380 00:20:21,960 --> 00:20:24,360 But as the volume of correspondence increased,

381 00:20:24,800 --> 00:20:27,800 patterns began to emerge that were impossible to ignore.

382 00:20:28,520 --> 00:20:31,320 The misfortunes described in the letters fell into distinct

383 00:20:31,320 --> 00:20:35,920 categories, financial disasters, relationship breakdowns, sudden

384 00:20:35,920 --> 00:20:39,400 illnesses, unexplained accidents, and technological

385 00:20:39,400 --> 00:20:42,040 failures that seemed to follow the letter writers wherever they

386 00:20:42,040 --> 00:20:44,640 went. Doctor Sandra Chen, a

387 00:20:44,640 --> 00:20:47,440 psychologist who studied the Robert phenomenon in the late

388 00:20:47,440 --> 00:20:51,800 1990s, documented over 200 cases of individuals who claimed to

389 00:20:51,800 --> 00:20:54,880 have been cursed by the doll. Her research revealed that the

390 00:20:54,880 --> 00:20:58,440 reported misfortunes typically began within 72 hours of

391 00:20:58,440 --> 00:21:01,680 photographing Robert without permission and continued until

392 00:21:01,680 --> 00:21:04,840 the affected individuals either wrote formal apology letters to

393 00:21:04,840 --> 00:21:08,400 the doll or returned to Key West to apologize in person.

394 00:21:08,880 --> 00:21:11,360 The consistency of these accounts, combined with the

395 00:21:11,360 --> 00:21:15,040 detailed documentation provided by the letter writers, suggested

396 00:21:15,040 --> 00:21:17,520 something beyond mere psychological suggestion.

397 00:21:18,000 --> 00:21:21,160 The museum security cameras captured increasingly dramatic

398 00:21:21,160 --> 00:21:23,680 evidence of Robert's supernatural activity.

399 00:21:24,440 --> 00:21:27,920 Footage from 1998 shows the doll's head turning to follow

400 00:21:27,920 --> 00:21:31,400 visitors as they move through the exhibit area, a movement so

401 00:21:31,400 --> 00:21:33,800 subtle that it was only noticeable when the video was

402 00:21:33,800 --> 00:21:37,560 played back in slow motion. Other recordings captured

403 00:21:37,560 --> 00:21:40,880 objects in Robert's display case shifting position overnight.

404 00:21:41,160 --> 00:21:44,240 Despite the case being locked and monitored continuously,

405 00:21:44,960 --> 00:21:47,720 staff members developed their own rituals for dealing with

406 00:21:47,720 --> 00:21:50,320 Robert's presence. They would greet him each

407 00:21:50,320 --> 00:21:53,120 morning when opening the museum and bid him good night before

408 00:21:53,120 --> 00:21:55,360 leaving. Those who forgot these

409 00:21:55,360 --> 00:21:58,880 courtesies often experienced equipment failures, unexplained

410 00:21:58,880 --> 00:22:01,920 accidents or an overwhelming sense of being watched

411 00:22:01,920 --> 00:22:05,440 throughout their shifts. Patricia Rodriguez, who had

412 00:22:05,440 --> 00:22:08,840 worked with Robert longer than any other staff member, claims

413 00:22:08,840 --> 00:22:11,320 she could sense his moods and would warn visitors when the

414 00:22:11,320 --> 00:22:13,360 doll seemed particularly agitated.

415 00:22:14,200 --> 00:22:16,600 The phenomenon reached international attention when a

416 00:22:16,600 --> 00:22:20,240 British television crew visited the museum in 1999 to film a

417 00:22:20,240 --> 00:22:22,320 documentary about haunted objects.

418 00:22:22,760 --> 00:22:25,760 During their visit, every piece of electronic equipment they

419 00:22:25,760 --> 00:22:27,920 brought malfunctioned in Robert's presence.

420 00:22:28,440 --> 00:22:31,280 Their cameras captured footage that showed the dolls expression

421 00:22:31,280 --> 00:22:34,640 appearing to change, shifting from neutral to menacing over

422 00:22:34,640 --> 00:22:37,960 the course of several minutes. When the crew returned to London

423 00:22:37,960 --> 00:22:40,560 and attempted to edit their footage, they discovered that

424 00:22:40,560 --> 00:22:43,400 all recordings made within 10 feet of Robert's case had been

425 00:22:43,400 --> 00:22:47,200 corrupted beyond repair. By the turn of the Millennium,

426 00:22:47,480 --> 00:22:50,640 the East Martello Museum was receiving an average of 50

427 00:22:50,640 --> 00:22:53,520 apology letters per month from visitors who believed they had

428 00:22:53,520 --> 00:22:57,400 been cursed by Robert the doll. The museum began displaying a

429 00:22:57,400 --> 00:23:00,200 selection of these letters alongside Robert's exhibit,

430 00:23:00,520 --> 00:23:03,520 creating a growing testament to his supernatural power.

431 00:23:04,320 --> 00:23:07,360 The letters came from every continent, written in dozens of

432 00:23:07,360 --> 00:23:10,840 languages, all sharing the same desperate tone of individuals

433 00:23:10,840 --> 00:23:13,640 seeking forgiveness from a force they couldn't understand but

434 00:23:13,640 --> 00:23:17,000 couldn't deny. The museum staff noticed that

435 00:23:17,000 --> 00:23:20,080 Robert's activity seemed to intensify during certain times

436 00:23:20,080 --> 00:23:23,560 of the year, particularly around the anniversary of his creation

437 00:23:23,560 --> 00:23:27,240 in 19 O 6 and during the hurricane season that plagued

438 00:23:27,240 --> 00:23:30,160 the Florida Keys. During these periods, the

439 00:23:30,160 --> 00:23:33,080 apology letters would arrive in greater numbers and the

440 00:23:33,080 --> 00:23:36,000 supernatural incidents within the museum would escalate.

441 00:23:36,680 --> 00:23:39,720 Security guards reported seeing the dolls silhouette moving

442 00:23:39,720 --> 00:23:42,920 through the building after hours, and visitors claimed they

443 00:23:42,920 --> 00:23:45,360 could hear the sound of children's laughter coming from

444 00:23:45,360 --> 00:23:48,600 empty rooms. Robert had evolved from a local

445 00:23:48,600 --> 00:23:52,040 curiosity into a genuine pilgrimage destination for those

446 00:23:52,040 --> 00:23:56,160 seeking supernatural encounters. Paranormal investigators from

447 00:23:56,160 --> 00:23:59,360 around the world traveled to Key West specifically to document

448 00:23:59,360 --> 00:24:02,560 his activity, though few succeeded in capturing evidence

449 00:24:02,560 --> 00:24:04,600 that satisfied scientific scrutiny.

450 00:24:05,400 --> 00:24:08,400 The doll seemed to reserve his most dramatic manifestations for

451 00:24:08,400 --> 00:24:11,960 ordinary visitors who approached him with genuine respect or fear

452 00:24:12,120 --> 00:24:14,520 while treating professional skeptics with contempt.

453 00:24:15,040 --> 00:24:18,400 The East Martello Museum's mail delivery has become one of Key

454 00:24:18,400 --> 00:24:20,840 West's most unusual daily rituals.

455 00:24:21,600 --> 00:24:24,400 Each morning, postal workers arrive with bags of

456 00:24:24,400 --> 00:24:28,240 correspondence addressed not to the museum staff, but directly

457 00:24:28,240 --> 00:24:31,880 to Robert the doll himself. These letters arrive from every

458 00:24:31,880 --> 00:24:35,680 corner of the globe, written in dozens of languages, all sharing

459 00:24:35,680 --> 00:24:39,080 the same desperate purpose, begging forgiveness from a three

460 00:24:39,080 --> 00:24:42,440 foot tall sailor suited figure who sits silently in his glass

461 00:24:42,440 --> 00:24:45,560 case, seemingly indifferent to the human suffering he has

462 00:24:45,560 --> 00:24:47,960 caused. The museum now displays A

463 00:24:47,960 --> 00:24:50,840 rotating selection of these apology letters alongside

464 00:24:50,840 --> 00:24:54,280 Robert's exhibit, creating a wall of desperation that serves

465 00:24:54,280 --> 00:24:57,440 as both warning and testament to his supernatural power.

466 00:24:58,200 --> 00:25:01,160 The letters reveal intimate details of lives destroyed by

467 00:25:01,160 --> 00:25:04,520 what their writers believed to be Robert's curse, each one a

468 00:25:04,520 --> 00:25:07,320 personal confession of misfortune that began the moment

469 00:25:07,320 --> 00:25:09,240 they photographed him without permission.

470 00:25:10,080 --> 00:25:13,600 A letter from Sarah Mitchell of Denver, Co, written in shaking

471 00:25:13,600 --> 00:25:16,840 handwriting on hospital stationery describes how her

472 00:25:16,840 --> 00:25:21,080 family's life unraveled after their 2018 vacation to Key West.

473 00:25:21,800 --> 00:25:25,080 Within a week of returning home, her husband was diagnosed with a

474 00:25:25,080 --> 00:25:28,480 rare blood disorder, her teenage daughter was injured in a car

475 00:25:28,480 --> 00:25:31,400 accident, and their house suffered extensive damage from a

476 00:25:31,400 --> 00:25:34,160 freak hailstorm. The insurance company denied

477 00:25:34,160 --> 00:25:37,120 their claims due to a paperwork error that had never occurred in

478 00:25:37,120 --> 00:25:40,920 the company's 40 year history. Sarah's letter, stained with

479 00:25:40,920 --> 00:25:43,880 tears, pleads with Robert to spare her family from further

480 00:25:43,880 --> 00:25:48,800 suffering from Tokyo, Japan. Businessman Hiroshi Tanaka wrote

481 00:25:48,800 --> 00:25:52,640 a formal apology in both Japanese and English, describing

482 00:25:52,640 --> 00:25:55,600 how his thriving electronics company collapsed within six

483 00:25:55,600 --> 00:25:59,240 months of his Key West visit. Every major contract was

484 00:25:59,240 --> 00:26:02,400 mysteriously canceled, key employees quit without

485 00:26:02,400 --> 00:26:05,720 explanation, and a series of equipment failures cost him

486 00:26:05,720 --> 00:26:10,040 millions in lost revenue. Tanaka included a photograph of

487 00:26:10,040 --> 00:26:13,560 himself bowing deeply before Robert's image, a gesture of

488 00:26:13,560 --> 00:26:15,880 respect he hoped would appease the angry spirit.

489 00:26:16,800 --> 00:26:19,320 The letters often include offerings intended to win

490 00:26:19,320 --> 00:26:22,360 Robert's favor. Museum staff have received

491 00:26:22,360 --> 00:26:26,400 packages containing expensive toys, vintage sailor suits, and

492 00:26:26,400 --> 00:26:29,720 even substantial monetary donations made in Robert's name.

493 00:26:30,280 --> 00:26:32,880 A wealthy collector from Switzerland sent an antique

494 00:26:32,880 --> 00:26:36,280 music box that plays the same melody Robert's original owner

495 00:26:36,280 --> 00:26:38,280 claimed to hear coming from the dolls room.

496 00:26:38,800 --> 00:26:42,440 A family from Australia mailed a hand carved wooden ship hoping

497 00:26:42,440 --> 00:26:45,440 that Robert might appreciate a nautical theme that matched his

498 00:26:45,440 --> 00:26:48,360 sailor suit. Children's letters provide some

499 00:26:48,360 --> 00:26:51,040 of the most heartbreaking accounts of Robert's influence.

500 00:26:51,800 --> 00:26:54,920 8 year old Emma Rodriguez from Phoenix drew pictures of herself

501 00:26:54,920 --> 00:26:57,920 crying, explaining in crayon that her parents had been

502 00:26:57,920 --> 00:27:01,000 fighting constantly since their trip to see the scary doll man.

503 00:27:01,480 --> 00:27:03,800 She promised to never take pictures without asking

504 00:27:03,800 --> 00:27:06,600 permission and begged Robert to make her mommy and daddy happy

505 00:27:06,600 --> 00:27:09,360 again. Her letter arrived with a small

506 00:27:09,360 --> 00:27:12,040 teddy bear and a note from her mother confirming that the

507 00:27:12,040 --> 00:27:14,960 family's problems had indeed begun immediately after their

508 00:27:14,960 --> 00:27:18,280 museum visit. The international scope of

509 00:27:18,280 --> 00:27:21,160 Robert's curse defies logical explanation.

510 00:27:21,680 --> 00:27:24,960 Letters arrive from remote villages in Romania, urban

511 00:27:24,960 --> 00:27:28,480 centers in Brazil, and isolated islands in the Pacific.

512 00:27:29,200 --> 00:27:32,000 A fishing boat captain from Norway wrote that his vessel had

513 00:27:32,000 --> 00:27:34,560 experienced nothing but mechanical failures and poor

514 00:27:34,560 --> 00:27:37,120 catches since he photographed Robert during a Caribbean

515 00:27:37,120 --> 00:27:40,120 cruise. A teacher from rural Kenya

516 00:27:40,120 --> 00:27:42,880 described how her school had been plagued by inexplicable

517 00:27:42,880 --> 00:27:45,560 accidents and equipment breakdowns after she showed her

518 00:27:45,560 --> 00:27:48,160 students a photograph of Robert she had taken during a

519 00:27:48,160 --> 00:27:50,280 educational trip to the United States.

520 00:27:50,960 --> 00:27:54,080 Museum curator David Sloan has been documenting these letters

521 00:27:54,080 --> 00:27:57,840 for over a decade, creating a database that reveals disturbing

522 00:27:57,840 --> 00:28:00,240 patterns in Robert's supernatural influence.

523 00:28:01,120 --> 00:28:04,080 The most common complaints involve financial ruin, with

524 00:28:04,080 --> 00:28:07,760 businesses failing, investments collapsing, and unexpected

525 00:28:07,760 --> 00:28:09,640 expenses draining savings accounts.

526 00:28:10,280 --> 00:28:13,960 Relationship destruction follows closely behind, with marriages

527 00:28:13,960 --> 00:28:17,640 ending in divorce, friendships dissolving, and family members

528 00:28:17,640 --> 00:28:20,240 becoming a strange for inexplicable reasons.

529 00:28:20,760 --> 00:28:23,320 Health problems represent another consistent theme in the

530 00:28:23,320 --> 00:28:26,840 apology letters. Writers describe sudden onset of

531 00:28:26,840 --> 00:28:30,200 mysterious illnesses, accidents that occur with suspicious

532 00:28:30,200 --> 00:28:33,360 frequency, and medical conditions that doctors struggle

533 00:28:33,360 --> 00:28:35,240 to diagnose or treat effectively.

534 00:28:36,160 --> 00:28:39,120 A nurse from Atlanta wrote that she had experienced 7 separate

535 00:28:39,120 --> 00:28:42,000 injuries requiring emergency room visits in the two months

536 00:28:42,000 --> 00:28:45,520 following her unauthorized photograph of Robert, injuries

537 00:28:45,520 --> 00:28:48,320 that range from kitchen accidents to falls down stairs

538 00:28:48,320 --> 00:28:50,520 that she had navigated safely for years.

539 00:28:51,200 --> 00:28:53,840 The technological failures described in the letters extend

540 00:28:53,840 --> 00:28:56,680 far beyond the immediate camera malfunctions experienced at the

541 00:28:56,680 --> 00:28:59,040 museum. Writers report that their

542 00:28:59,040 --> 00:29:02,040 electronic devices continue to malfunction for months after

543 00:29:02,040 --> 00:29:05,600 their encounter with Robert. Computers crash without warning,

544 00:29:05,880 --> 00:29:09,360 smartphones develop inexplicable glitches, and even simple

545 00:29:09,360 --> 00:29:12,640 appliances like microwaves and washing machines begin operating

546 00:29:12,640 --> 00:29:16,120 erratically. A software engineer from Silicon

547 00:29:16,120 --> 00:29:18,840 Valley wrote that his reputation in the tech industry was

548 00:29:18,840 --> 00:29:22,000 destroyed when every program he developed after photographing

549 00:29:22,000 --> 00:29:25,400 Robert contained mysterious bugs that his team couldn't identify

550 00:29:25,400 --> 00:29:28,520 or fix. Some letter writers describe

551 00:29:28,520 --> 00:29:31,240 returning to Key West specifically to apologize to

552 00:29:31,240 --> 00:29:34,880 Robert in person, making pilgrimages to the East Martello

553 00:29:34,880 --> 00:29:37,600 Museum in hopes of lifting the curse that has destroyed their

554 00:29:37,600 --> 00:29:40,680 lives. These visitors often spend hours

555 00:29:40,680 --> 00:29:44,280 standing before Robert's case, speaking aloud their apologies

556 00:29:44,280 --> 00:29:48,000 and pleading for mercy. Museum staff report that many of

557 00:29:48,000 --> 00:29:51,280 these individuals breakdown in tears, overcome by the

558 00:29:51,280 --> 00:29:54,080 psychological weight of their experiences and the desperate

559 00:29:54,080 --> 00:29:56,840 hope that their journey to Key West might finally end their

560 00:29:56,840 --> 00:30:00,040 suffering. The most disturbing letters come

561 00:30:00,040 --> 00:30:03,120 from individuals who claim that Robert's influence has followed

562 00:30:03,120 --> 00:30:05,200 them across multiple relocations.

563 00:30:05,680 --> 00:30:08,240 A military family wrote that they had been transferred to

564 00:30:08,240 --> 00:30:11,360 three different bases in two years, but the curse seemed to

565 00:30:11,360 --> 00:30:14,680 travel with them, causing problems at each new assignment.

566 00:30:15,240 --> 00:30:18,640 Their letter, written from their 4th duty station, expressed

567 00:30:18,640 --> 00:30:21,360 their growing fear that there was no escape from Robert's

568 00:30:21,360 --> 00:30:24,720 supernatural reach. Museum staff have noticed that

569 00:30:24,720 --> 00:30:27,480 the volume of apology letters increases during certain

570 00:30:27,480 --> 00:30:30,960 periods, particularly around Halloween and during the

571 00:30:30,960 --> 00:30:33,400 anniversary of Robert Eugene Otto's death.

572 00:30:34,200 --> 00:30:37,280 During these peak times, the museum can receive over 100

573 00:30:37,280 --> 00:30:40,000 letters in a single week, creating a backlog of

574 00:30:40,000 --> 00:30:42,960 correspondence that requires additional staff to process and

575 00:30:42,960 --> 00:30:45,640 catalog. The letters have become an

576 00:30:45,640 --> 00:30:48,840 integral part of Robert's legend, transforming him from a

577 00:30:48,840 --> 00:30:52,400 local curiosity into a global phenomenon that continues to

578 00:30:52,400 --> 00:30:55,480 terrify people decades after their initial encounter with his

579 00:30:55,480 --> 00:30:59,480 malevolent presence. Today, more than a century after

580 00:30:59,480 --> 00:31:02,480 a vengeful servant wove her dark intentions into cloth and

581 00:31:02,480 --> 00:31:05,720 stuffing, Robert the Doll remains as active as ever.

582 00:31:06,600 --> 00:31:09,520 The East Martello Museum continues to receive an average

583 00:31:09,520 --> 00:31:12,760 of three apology letters each week, a steady stream of

584 00:31:12,760 --> 00:31:15,520 desperation from around the world that shows no signs of

585 00:31:15,520 --> 00:31:18,160 diminishing. Each letter tells the same

586 00:31:18,160 --> 00:31:21,680 story, a moment of disrespect followed by a cascade of

587 00:31:21,680 --> 00:31:25,000 inexplicable misfortune that can only be stopped through genuine

588 00:31:25,000 --> 00:31:28,240 remorse. The museum staff have become

589 00:31:28,240 --> 00:31:31,000 accustomed to their role as intermediaries between the

590 00:31:31,000 --> 00:31:34,360 living and whatever malevolent force inhabits the sailor suited

591 00:31:34,360 --> 00:31:36,800 figure. They read each letter aloud to

592 00:31:36,800 --> 00:31:40,040 Robert, hoping that the act of acknowledgement might provide

593 00:31:40,040 --> 00:31:41,960 some relief to the suffering writers.

594 00:31:42,360 --> 00:31:45,080 Some visitors report that their luck improved after their

595 00:31:45,080 --> 00:31:48,240 apology letters were delivered, while others claim the curse

596 00:31:48,240 --> 00:31:51,040 continued despite their desperate pleas for forgiveness.

597 00:31:51,960 --> 00:31:55,360 Robert sits in his glass case, surrounded by hundreds of

598 00:31:55,360 --> 00:31:59,120 letters from his victims, his painted expression unchanged by

599 00:31:59,120 --> 00:32:01,480 the decades of human suffering he has witnessed.

600 00:32:02,200 --> 00:32:05,000 The security cameras still capture his subtle movements in

601 00:32:05,000 --> 00:32:08,520 the darkness, and new visitors still ignore the warnings posted

602 00:32:08,520 --> 00:32:12,560 throughout his exhibit. The cycle continues as it has

603 00:32:12,560 --> 00:32:16,280 for over 100 years, with each unauthorized photograph adding

604 00:32:16,280 --> 00:32:19,000 another name to the growing list of those who have learned too

605 00:32:19,000 --> 00:32:22,120 late that some legends refused to remain merely stories.

606 00:32:22,520 --> 00:32:25,240 The servant who created Robert achieved a revenge that has

607 00:32:25,240 --> 00:32:28,960 outlasted her own existence, crafting a curse that spans

608 00:32:28,960 --> 00:32:32,640 generations and continents, proving that some acts of malice

609 00:32:32,640 --> 00:32:35,280 echo through time with supernatural persistence.

610 00:32:38,600 --> 00:32:42,240 This has been midnight Signals. I'm Russ Chamberlain, guiding

611 00:32:42,240 --> 00:32:44,760 you through the shadows where history meets mystery.

612 00:32:45,200 --> 00:32:49,800 Until next time, stay vigilant, seek the hidden, and remember,

613 00:32:50,040 --> 00:32:52,280 in every silence there is a signal.

614 00:32:52,640 --> 00:32:55,480 And in every signal, a story waiting to be told.

your self worth isn't on trending

2025-12-09 23:30:47

I had a conversation with my therapist a while back about my personal blog. When I first started this blog, I told him that I really didn't care if my blog got popular or not, that I was doing this for me. Since then, I've had a couple of my posts end up on trending, either directly from this blog or stuff I've written for the Gazette.

My opinion remains the same, I do not care.

I do care in the sense that I'm glad a message spoke to so many people. However I'm not going to cater to trying to get on the trending page. I don't write to seek validation, I write to get something out and if people resonate with that, then that's great.

I feel like in the age of social media, there is so much pressure to cater to an "algorithm". People have been groomed into placing their self worth on how much engagement a post gets. Sometimes people will find a post randomly end up on a trending page and getting lots of engagement and then try and chase the dragon to recapture that brief moment of "fame". It's all extrinsic motivations.

I like to think of my blog as those YouTube vlogging channels back in the late 2000s, when it was just someone yapping into a camera. I'd like to keep it that way.

Whether my post gets 45 toasts or 7, it makes little difference to me. Because as I write, in my head I'm writing for me and my friends. I'm writing like I'm giving one of my friends advice, or shooting the shit about something dumb I'm encountering. Just now I'm having this one-way conversation with people passing by throughout their day, if they stop to listen and engage, then that's cool.

If I was to try and gear myself try and get on trending I would quickly burn out. For me, as soon as motivation becomes extrinsic, I immediately get bored or irritated easily. I don't want that. I hate ruining hobbies because I'm trying to match someone else's expectation.

I encourage the same for you, stop worrying about getting on trending if you find yourself doing that. Stop looking at the analytics page if it's putting you in a negative headspace. Don't feel discouraged if people aren't replying via email or toasting your article. Just keep going, remind yourself why you started blogging in the first place.

I think of the friends I made on this platform, some of whom end up on trending quite often. Would I value their writings any less if it wasn't on trending? No of course not, so why do that to myself?

This isn't a job, it's a hobby. Keep it that way.


Pirate is wearing black converse, green khakis, black Linkin Park tee, red flannel
Pirate is feeling happy
Pirate is listening to Return of Saturn : No Doubt
Pirate is playing Halo 3 pre-release builds


{{ previous_post }} | {{ next_post }}

Reply via email: [email protected]

I’ve failed recently

2025-12-09 22:43:10

I’ve been failing recently. I find myself looking at my phone often and being more concerned with finishing nightly tasks so I can hurry up and get a workout in before it’s time for bed. I get frustrated easily when things aren’t picked up, because it just means there’s extra things for me to do before I can relax.

This is a HUGE problem because I have two amazing young children. They deserve my full attention. Or, at the very least, more dedicated attention. Don’t get me wrong… I’m not ignoring them or not involved. I could just be better.

This damn phone, as much as it hurts and embarrasses me to say, steals my attention a lot of times. I used to think I wasn’t that guy.

News articles, memes, distractions. Distraction from the feeling of exhaustion after a long day at work. Distraction from the stress of keeping our house “in order” when we have no time to do it. Distraction from the financial stresses of the holidays and life in general. Distraction from the sadness of knowing my kids are growing up and I’ll never get this time back…

And that’s EXACTLY why I’m typing this up. I made a concerted effort yesterday to get back to my old self. Put the phone down when I got home and knocked out a quick workout. Had plenty of time to play with my kids and wasn’t stressed to rush through the evening. Now, I’m typing this as a means to continue that motion. Putting it out there and reminding myself of this stuff daily will only help me stay on the correct path.

I’m going to make the most out of this chapter in my life. The idea of regretting not taking in EVERY detail of my kids’ lives at this stage makes me sick to my stomach. I will never be able to outrun the sadness and crushing reality of them growing up and not needing me. But I can at least be more present.

converse™

2025-12-09 20:56:00

a hanging,
with stillness
and balance.
a pair,
floating in
no where.
strings chained,
flow electric,
through black
power lines.
like neurons.
the sole’s
moss filled.

“a pair of old converse”

\ \